Antiaris africana aqueous extract inhibits chronic demyelination and seizures in mice.

Demyelinating diseases are commonly associated with epileptic seizures and have limited management options. Hence, the need to investigate potential options for management of such seizures. Antiaris Africana extract (AE) was investigated for effect in chronic demyelinating seizures. Cuprizone treatment induced short but frequent spike discharges in mice. Antiaris Africana extract (300 mg/kg) treatment abolished epileptiform discharges. Cuprizone administration caused severe demyelination in the corpus callosum. After the demyelination phase, myelin content decreased to 22.86 ± 1.92 % in the cuprizone-only group. However, there was an increase to 52.14 ± 3.91 % in cuprizone-only group and 62.00 ± 2.78 % in the Antiaris africana extract group respectively, after a 4-week cuprizone cessation period. Treatment with AE and LEV visibly altered myelin growth. Antiaris africana extract treatment produced significant (P < 0.001, F (3, 16) = 698.4) increase in locomotor activity similar to LEV (P < 0.001,F (2, 12) = 678.7) and DZP (P < 0.001, F (2, 12) = 620.4) and improved beam traversal time (18.71 ± 2.244 s; 95 % CI: 13.22-24.20) while causing significantly (P < 0.05, F (2, 15) = 6.667) fewer stepping errors. Antiaris africana extract inhibits seizures induced by chronic demyelination and has beneficial effects on motor coordination.

Efficiency and safety of high-dose undiluted intravenous push levetiracetam loading doses compared to intravenous infusion in seizing patients: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous (IV) push (IVP) is an alternative administration method for levetiracetam, but evidence evaluating it compared to IV piggyback (IVPB) for loading doses in acutely seizing patients is limited, particularly in patients with status epilepticus (SE). This study aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of IVP versus IVPB levetiracetam loading doses. METHODS: This was a single-center sequential retrospective study conducted in adult (≥18 years) patients who received an IV levetiracetam loading dose (>2000 mg or ≥20 mg/kg) for acute or suspected seizure. The primary outcome was time to administration, compared between doses given as IVP versus IVPB. Secondary outcomes included rates of adverse events (AEs), rescue benzodiazepine or antiseizure medication administration, intubation, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission between groups. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were included; 116 received IVP and 130 received IVPB loading doses. Median age was 56 years; most patients were male (62%) and White (60%) and had witnessed seizures (67%). Doses were administered for SE in 32 (27.5%) and 46 (35.4%) patients in the IVP and IVPB arms, respectively. Median time to administration was shorter in the IVP group (12 vs. 38 min, p < .001). Bradycardia (1.7% vs. 2.3%, p = .99), hypotension (7.8% vs. 12%, p = .30), sedation (6% vs. 12.3%, p = .09), intubation (10% vs. 8%, p = .37), ICU admission (32% vs. 39%, p = .31), and rescue medication administration (8.6% vs. 14.6% p = .10) were similar between groups. In SE patients, IVP was associated with shorter time to administration (12 vs. 44 min, p = .003) and lower odds of ICU admission after adjustment for age, dose, Status Epilepticus Severity Score, and seizure history (adjusted odds ratio = .23, 95% confidence interval = .06-.81). SIGNIFICANCE: IVP reduced time to levetiracetam administration versus IVPB and was not associated with more AEs. Rescue agent use, intubation, and ICU admission were similar between arms, but IVP may reduce ICU admissions in SE patients. Prospective studies should assess the effectiveness of IVP versus IVPB.

Hyponatremia-Induced Epileptic Seizure Provoked by Levetiracetam and Pain Medication Intake in a Patient with Central Diabetes Insipidus.

Introduction: Causes of epileptic seizures are often multifactorial but for an effective therapy, they should be uncovered in detail. Case Presentation: We present a 67-year-old male patient with a central diabetes insipidus, who experienced a generalized tonic-clonic seizure. The patient was treated with levetiracetam for prevention of further seizures, opioids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, i.e., ibuprofen because of severe back pain due to vertebral compression fractures. In this setting, he developed significant hyponatremia and experienced another epileptic seizure. After stopping analgesics and switching from levetiracetam to lacosamide, sodium levels returned to normal and the patient remained free of seizures since then. Conclusion: The interrelationships of medical therapy, sodium levels and epileptic seizures in the context of central diabetes insipidus are discussed.

Is there any concern of insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunctions with antiseizure medications? A prospective comparative study of valproate vs. levetiracetam.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of insulin resistance and its association with change in serum anti-seizure medication (ASM) level and their pharmacokinetic, body composition and metabolic hormones after six months of levetiracetam (LEV) exposure in persons with epilepsy (PWE) in comparison to valproate (VPA). METHODS: This prospective-longitudinal study included clinically diagnosed PWE on VPA or LEV monotherapy (for<3 months). At enrolment, body weight/composition, BMI were measured and blood samples were collected for assessing metabolic dysfunctions by estimation of serum insulin, insulin resistance [in terms of Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)], leptin, adiponectin, lipid profile along with ASMs level. Subjects were followed up for six months and all the above parameters were reassessed. RESULTS: A total of 150 PWE were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 105 number of subjects were enrolled (n = 35 in VPA and n = 70 in LEV group). Out of them, 92 subjects (n = 32 in VPA; n = 60 in LEV) completed six months follow-up. After six months, serum insulin level increased significantly in VPA group compared to baseline p < 0.001). Insulin resistance (HOMA-IR>2.5) was observed in 14.28 % of PWE in VPA group. Significantly higher percentage-change in body-weight (p = 0.003), leptin and decreased adiponectin were found in VPA-group compared to baseline ((p = 0.003, 0.02, 0.001, <0.001, respectively). These changes were independent of serum level or pharmacokinetic of VPA. On the other hand, no such changes were observed in LEV-group despite increased serum LEV level and altered pharmacokinetic parameters after six months. CONCLUSION: Six months treatment with VPA resulted in insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunctions in PWE. These alterations were not correlated with change in VPA serum level. These changes were not observed in LEV therapy suggesting its better safety profile. This may be considered while prescribing the ASM like VPA and LEV in adult patients with obesity or insulin resistance and diabetes.

Perfil de prescripción de levetiracetam en niños menores de cuatro años atendidos en un hospital de alta complejidad de Chile / Levetiracetam prescription profile in children younger than 4 years treated at a tertiary care hospital in Chile

Introducción. El levetiracetam (LEV) es un antiepiléptico aprobado por el Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile como terapia concomitante en crisis epilépticas en niños mayores de cuatro años. Sin embargo, es ampliamente indicado desde el periodo neonatal, lo que hace necesario evaluar su utilización fuera de ficha técnica. Objetivo. Determinar el perfil de prescripción-indicación de LEV en el tratamiento de las crisis epilépticas en menores de cuatro años en un hospital de alta complejidad del sur de Chile. Población y método. Estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo. Se revisaron las historias clínicas de quienes iniciaron tratamiento con LEV entre 2014 y 2019, y se recopilaron datos sobre variables sociodemográficas, farmacológicas y clínicas. El análisis se basó en la descripción del perfil de los pacientes, prescripción, seguimiento y seguridad. Resultados. Se incluyeron 68 pacientes: 40 (58,8 %) de sexo masculino, 49 (72,1 %) con edad gestacional ≥ 37 semanas. La etiología principal de la epilepsia fue de tipo estructural (35,3 %); el LEV se utilizó principalmente en niños diagnosticados con malformación del sistema nervioso central (17,6 %) y predominó la monoterapia (55,9 %). En el 50 % se usó LEV para crisis focales. Cinco niños (7,3 %) presentaron trastornos de tipo psiquiátrico clasificados como probables reacciones adversas al medicamento. Conclusión. El LEV se utilizó en niños con diferentes diagnósticos con baja frecuencia de eventos adversos. El perfil de utilización varió en los diferentes grupos etarios. Es necesario identificar en futuros estudios la efectividad especialmente en el recién nacido y en epilepsias refractarias.

Introduction. Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiepileptic drug approved by the Chilean Institute of Public Health as concomitant therapy for epileptic seizures in children older than 4 years of age. However, it is widely prescribed from the neonatal period, which makes it necessary to evaluate its off-label use. Objective. To determine the prescription-indication profile of LEV in the treatment of epileptic seizures in children younger than 4 years in a tertiary care hospital in southern Chile. Population and method. Observational, descriptive, and retrospective study. The medical records of patients who started treatment with LEV between 2014 and 2019 were reviewed, and data on sociodemographic, pharmacological, and clinical variables were collected. The analysis was based on the description of the profile of patients, prescriptions, follow-up, and safety. Results. A total of 68 patients were included: 40 (58.8%) were males, 49 (72.1%) were born at a gestational age ≥ 37 weeks. The main etiology of epilepsy was structural (35.3%); LEV was mostly used in children diagnosed with central nervous system malformation (17.6%), and monotherapy was the prevailing dosage (55.9%). LEV was used for focal seizures in 50% of cases. Five children (7.3%) had psychiatric disorders, classified as probable adverse drug reactions. Conclusion. LEV was used in children with various diagnoses, with a low rate of adverse events. The profile of drug use varied in the different age groups. Future studies are needed to identify effectiveness, especially in newborn infants and patients with refractory epilepsy.

A Case of Oral-Buccal-Lingual Dyskinesia and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms After Prolonged Levetiracetam Exposure.

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a serious and often permanent complication usually seen after the long-term use of antipsychotic medications, and multiple other classes of medications have been reported to cause TD or TD-like syndromes. TD can affect any part of the body, but it most commonly affects the mouth, lips, and tongue. We present a case of oral-buccal-lingual dyskinesia in an 86-year-old female from the long-term use of levetiracetam for a seizure disorder. The patient was started on levetiracetam four years before admission and was noted to have an acute onset of oral-buccal-lingual dyskinesia that was so severe it interrupted the patient's speech and feeding. The patient's dyskinesias are completely resolved after cross-tapering levetiracetam 500 mg twice a day with valproic acid 750 mg daily. Additionally, there was a global recovery of the patient's mood and psychosis after the cross-taper. Our case highlights the potential implications of levetiracetam in dyskinetic movements and neuropsychiatric symptoms, and it warrants close monitoring of patients taking this medication especially elderly with multiple comorbidities and compromised renal function. Moreover, the case suggests the reversible nature of both neuropsychiatric symptoms and dyskinesias.

Challenges of status epilepticus management in a resource-limited setting: A review.

Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening neurological condition with significant mortality. Rapid management is essential to minimize the mortality and disability of SE. Two recent trials provided evidence to guide SE management in early and established stages. The Rapid Anticonvulsant Medication Prior To Arrival Trial (RAMPART, 2011) showed that intramuscular midazolam is a better alternative for early convulsive SE in prehospital settings. The Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT, 2020) supported the use of sodium valproate and levetiracetam as second-line treatment for its efficacy and shorter administration time. However, there are challenges to revising the status epilepticus management in resource-limited settings, in pre-hospital, first- and second-line treatment, as well as management of refractory and super-refractory SE. These challenges included restrictions or lack of training in the administration of benzodiazepine in the prehospital setting, limited availability and accessibility of newer antiseizure medications (ASMs) in emergency departments and smaller hospitals, and low clinicians' awareness of the latest evidence. A collaborative effort to educate, improve awareness, and make certain ASMs more readily available is recommended to achieve a better clinical outcome in SE.

Levetiracetam pharmacokinetics in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A case report.

This case report describes the pharmacokinetics of levetiracetam in a critically ill patient supported on venovenous membrane oxygenation. While levetiracetam has emerged as a first line option to treat seizures in critically ill patients, there is limited information available regarding the impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on the pharmacokinetics of this medication. This report contributes to the limited body of literature describing the pharmacokinetics of medications in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Sequential levetiracetam and phenytoin in electroencephalographic neonatal seizures unresponsive to phenobarbital: a multicenter prospective observational study in India.

Background: Although levetiracetam and phenytoin are widely used antiseizure medications (ASM) in neonates, their efficacy on seizure freedom is unclear. We evaluated electroencephalographic (EEG) seizure freedom following sequential levetiracetam and phenytoin in neonatal seizures unresponsive to phenobarbital. Methods: We recruited neonates born ≥35 weeks and aged <72 h who had continued electrographic seizures despite phenobarbital, from three Indian hospitals, between 20 June 2020 and 31 July 2022. The neonates were treated with intravenous levetiracetam (20 mg/kg x 2 doses, second line) followed by phenytoin (20 mg/kg x 2 doses, third line) if seizures persisted. The primary outcome was complete seizure freedom, defined as an absence of seizures on EEG for at least 60 min within 40 min from the start of infusion. Findings: Of the 206 neonates with continued seizures despite phenobarbital, 152 received levetiracetam with EEG. Of these one EEG was missing, 47 (31.1%) were in status epilepticus, and primary outcome data were available in 145. Seizure freedom occurred in 20 (13.8%; 95% CI 8.6%-20.5%) after levetiracetam; 16 (80.0%) responded to the first dose and 4 (20.0%) to the second dose. Of the 125 neonates with persisting seizures after levetiracetam, 114 received phenytoin under EEG monitoring. Of these, the primary outcome data were available in 104. Seizure freedom occurred in 59 (56.7%; 95% CI 46.7%-66.4%) neonates; 54 (91.5%) responded to the first dose and 5 (8.5%) to the second dose. Interpretation: With the conventional doses, levetiracetam was associated with immediate EEG seizure cessation in only 14% of phenobarbital unresponsive neonatal seizures. Additional treatment with phenytoin along with levetiracetam attained seizure freedom in further 57%. Safety and efficacy of higher doses of levetiracetam should be evaluated in well-designed randomised controlled trials. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Research and Innovation for Global Health Transformation (NIHR200144).

Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Concomitant Anti-seizure Medications: A Retrospective, Case-Control Study in a Real-World Setting.

PURPOSE: Although prescription of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for epileptic patients on anti-seizure medications (ASMs) is on the increase, international guidelines pose strict restrictions because this may lead to pharmacologic interactions. However, current evidence on their clinical relevance remains scanty. This retrospective, case-control study assessed the frequency of ischemic/hemorrhagic events and epileptic seizures involving DOAC-ASM cotherapy in the real world, compared with DOAC and ASM monotherapy, in age- and gender-matched controls. METHODS: Data on patients who had been prescribed a concomitant DOAC and ASM therapy for at least 6 months were extracted from the database of the Pharmaceutical Service of the Alessandria Province (Italy). After exclusions, the case group included 124 patients, 44 on valproic acid (VPA) and 80 on levetiracetam (LEV) concomitant with a DOAC, and it was compared with the DOAC-control and ASM-control groups. The clinical and laboratory data were extracted from the electronic archives of the hospitals in the same province. FINDINGS: Two (1.6%) ischemic and 2 (1.6%) major hemorrhagic events were observed in the case group. Four (3.2%) ischemic and no hemorrhagic events occurred in the DOAC-control group. There were no statistically significant differences in the ischemic and hemorrhagic events between the case group (patients on concomitant LEV or VPA who were prescribed a DOAC) and the DOAC-control group, and there was no difference in the recurrence rate of epileptic seizures between the case group and the ASM-control group. IMPLICATIONS: Although this study has some limits, mainly the small sample size, our findings indicate that neither LEV nor VPA concomitant treatment significantly affects the effects of DOACs in a real-world setting.

Monitoring levetiracetam concentration in saliva during pregnancy is stable and feasible.

AIMS: This multicenter prospective cohort study (registration no. ChiCTR2000032089) aimed to investigate the relationship between saliva and plasma levetiracetam concentrations to determine whether saliva could be used for routine monitoring of levetiracetam during pregnancy. METHODS: The slot concentrations of levetiracetam in simultaneously obtained saliva and plasma samples were measured using UPLC-MS/MS. The correlations between saliva and plasma levetiracetam concentrations and the dose-normalized concentrations were compared among pregnant women in different stages and nonpregnant control participants with epilepsy. RESULTS: In total, 231 patients with 407 plasma and saliva sample pairs were enrolled from 39 centers. Linear relationships between salivary and plasma levetiracetam concentrations were reported in the enrolled population (r = 0.898, p < 0.001), including pregnant (r = 0.935, p < 0.001) and nonpregnant participants (r = 0.882, p < 0.001). Plasma concentrations were moderately higher than saliva concentrations, with ratios of saliva to plasma concentrations of 0.98 for nonpregnant women, 0.98, 1, and 1.12 for pregnant women during the first trimester, the second trimester, the and third trimester, respectively. The effective range of saliva levetiracetam concentration was found to be 9.98 µg/mL (lower limit) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.937 (95% confidence intervals, 0.915-0.959), sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 86.8%, and p < 0.001, to 24.05 µg/mL (upper limit) with an AUC of 0.952 (0.914-0.99), sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 92.3%, and p = 0.007. CONCLUSION: The saliva/plasma concentration ratio of levetiracetam remains constant during pregnancy and is similar to that in non-pregnant individuals. Monitoring levetiracetam concentration in saliva during pregnancy should be widely promoted.

Evaluation of Neuroinflammatory Contribution to Neurodegeneration in LRRK2 Drosophila Models.

Pathological mutations in the LRRK2 gene are the major genetic cause of Parkinson's disease (PD). Although several animal models with either LRRK2 down- or over-expression have been developed, the physiological function of LRRK2 remains elusive. LRRK2 is constitutively expressed in various tissues including neurons and glial cells, but importantly, it is expressed at low levels in dopaminergic neurons, further contributing to the cryptic function of LRRK2. Significant levels of LRRK2 protein and mRNA have been detected in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, lymph nodes, the spleen, and primary microglia, strongly suggesting the contribution of inflammatory cells to neuronal degeneration. In this research article, using Drosophila LRRK2 models, we were able to demonstrate a significant contribution of glial cells to the LRRK2 pathological phenotype. Furthermore, in Drosophila, neurodegeneration is associated with a significant and important increase in specific inflammatory peptides. Finally, levetiracetam, a compound widely used in human therapy to treat epilepsy, was able to rescue both neuronal degeneration and neuroinflammation.

Clinical and paraclinical features of first unprovoked seizures in the elderly.

PURPOSE: The prevalence of unprovoked seizures and epilepsy rises significantly in later life stages. This study examines various factors in elderly patients (over 65 years) with their first unprovoked seizures, comparing findings with younger patients. METHODS: We analyzed electronic medical records of individuals with first unprovoked seizures retrospectively. Diagnosis was based on patient history and witness accounts, and exclusion of other potential causes. Data included demographics, physical examination, seizure characteristics, neuroimaging, EEG findings, laboratory markers, potential causes, prescribed anti-seizure medications (ASMs) at diagnosis and follow-up, seizure-related injuries and hospital stay length. RESULTS: We enrolled 391 patients (mean age 73.02 ± 16.5, 219 females). Most had late-onset (≥65 years) seizures (n = 295, 75.5 %). Status epilepticus was diagnosed in 10.2 %, more in the late-onset group. Elderly patients most often had focal seizures with impaired consciousness, while younger patients had focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. (55.9 % vs 36.5 %). Late-onset seizures were linked to cerebrovascular diseases, small vessel disease, and cerebral atrophy, while early-onset cases were associated with brain tumors or unknown causes. Brain imaging revealed potentially epileptogenic abnormalities in 59.1 %. Positive paraneoplastic or autoimmune antibodies were found in 0.8 %. Abnormal EEGs were present in 25.9 %, more in the late-onset group. Most patients were discharged with levetiracetam (LEV) or lamotrigine (LTG) monotherapy. Nine patients with late-onset seizures died during in-hospital follow-up. CONCLUSION: Our findings can contribute to the improved identification and characterization of patients with late-onset seizures, facilitating targeted diagnostics and appropriate treatment in this challenging patient population.

Effects of levetiracetam on bone mineral density and bone metabolism in patients with epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The effects of levetiracetam (LEV) on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism are currently inconclusive, and this study was designed to answer this question. METHODS: Citations from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases (up to February 4, 2024) were reviewed. The effects of LEV on BMD as well as bone metabolism indicators were measured by calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024509560). RESULTS: A total of 612 individuals from 13 studies were included in the present analysis. Of the items related to bone metabolism, LEV was found to be associated significantly with decreased serum calcium with an SMD of -0.47 (95 % CI, -0.77- -0.16; p = 0.04). However, changes in other markers (including serum phosphorus, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, alkaline phosphatase, and parathyroid hormone) were not statistically significantly correlated with the use of LEV (p > 0.05). Also, when compared to the control groups, the changes in BMD of the observation groups were not significant (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of LEV may significantly reduce serum calcium in patients with epilepsy, and regular monitoring of bone metabolism-related indicators is recommended.

An update on pharmacotherapy for trigeminal neuralgia.

INTRODUCTION: Trigeminal neuralgia is a rare condition that can be effectively treated by carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine but these older drugs are associated with dose-dependent and potentially treatment-limiting adverse effects. Third-generation anticonvulsants, new calcitonin gene-related peptide blockers for migraine, and older drugs such as ketamine and cannabinoids may be promising adjuvants or monotherapeutic options. AREAS COVERED: The new drugs, their presumed mechanisms of action, safety and efficacy are discussed herein. There is a paucity of robust clinical evidence in support of these drugs for trigeminal neuralgia. New migraine agents are considered as well although migraines and trigeminal neuralgia are distinct, albeit similar, conditions. No new drugs have been released to market in recent years with the specific indication of trigeminal neuralgia. EXPERT OPINION: In real-world clinical practice, about half of trigeminal neuralgia patients take more than one agent for prevention and combination therapy may be the optimal approach. Combination therapy might allow for lower doses of carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine, thus reducing the number and severity of potential adverse events but the potential for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions must be considered. Drug therapy for trigeminal neuralgia involves acute or abortive treatments, often administered in hospital versus long-term preventive therapy, usually involving oral agents.

Trigeminal neuralgia is a relatively rare condition that usually affects one side of the face below the eye around the cheekbone. The cause of trigeminal neuralgia is sometimes a damaged nerve or a nerve that has lost part of its outer protective sheath (myelin). However, trigeminal neuralgia may have other neurological causes as well. Pain can be triggered by touch, pressure, or chewing and it tends to occur in very painful brief attacks followed by pauses with little or no pain. There are two types of drug treatment for trigeminal neuralgia: drugs to stop an ongoing attack (which are often administered in an emergency room or hospital intravenously) and drugs that are taken orally over the long term to reduce or prevent attacks.The two most effective drugs for trigeminal neuralgia are carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine, which are actually drugs to prevent seizures. They are effective in reducing the pain intensity and number of attacks of trigeminal neuralgia but they have side effects. In fact, these side effects can be so severe that people stop taking the drugs.Many new drugs have come to market recently that may work for trigeminal neuralgia, although none was specifically developed for this use. The newest generation of anti-seizure medications including eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, levetiracetam, and retigabine, may be just as effective as the older carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine drugs with fewer side effects. Clinical studies are needed to test them in trigeminal neuralgia patients but their mechanisms of action suggest that they might work well.There are some new drugs developed for migraine headache that inhibit a substance in the body called CGRP. Migraine headaches and trigeminal neuralgia have some of the same symptoms but they are different conditions but both involve too much CGRP.Other new drugs include lasmiditan, pimozide (used for Tourette syndrome), tizanidine (muscle relaxant), lamotrigine and vixotrigine (anti-seizure drugs) may also be beneficial. It may be that people with trigeminal neuralgia will have to take combination therapy, the use of two or more drugs with different mechanisms of action. Older drugs like ketamine and cannabinoids are also being considered as possible add-on agents for therapy for trigeminal neuralgia.

Serum perampanel levels in patients with seizures are not affected by hemodialysis.

Perampanel belongs to a novel class of antiseizure medications (ASMs). Studies examining the effect of hemodialysis on perampanel serum levels in clinical settings are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the changes in serum perampanel levels during hemodialysis. We studied patients with seizures who received oral perampanel between April 2020 and March 2023 and whose serum concentration of perampanel was measured before and after hemodialysis. We analyzed the serum concentrations of levetiracetam and lacosamide for comparison. Fourteen patients, with a mean age of 76.1 ± 7.88 years, were included. The dose of perampanel was 2.14 ± 1.27 mg. The hemodialysis clearance rate of perampanel, levetiracetam, and lacosamide was 0 ± 13%, 69 ± 11%, and 59.6 ± 8.2%, respectively. The post-dialysis CD ratio decreased significantly with levetiracetam but not with perampanel. Adverse but acceptable effects of perampanel were observed in two patients. The serum concentrations of several ASMs have been shown to be reduced during hemodialysis. Our study revealed that the serum perampanel concentration does not decrease during hemodialysis. Owing to the low rate of adverse effects and the stability of perampanel serum concentration during hemodialysis, perampanel could be a favorable choice as an ASM for patients with seizures undergoing hemodialysis. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Our study looked at how hemodialysis affects the serum levels of perampanel, a new type of medication for seizures. In 14 patients who started treatment between April 2020 and March 2023, perampanel serum levels did not decrease during hemodialysis, unlike other seizure medications. This shows that perampanel can be a good option for patients with seizures who need hemodialysis, with fewer side effects compared to other medications.