Clinical outcomes of second-line therapy following disease progression on first-line modified FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) is one of the standard first-line therapies in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, there is no globally accepted second-line therapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX. METHODS: Patients with BRPC and LAPC (n = 647) treated with first-line mFOLFIRINOX between January 2017 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. The details of the treatment outcomes and patterns of subsequent therapy after mFOLFIRINOX were reviewed. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 44.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.3-47.6), 322 patients exhibited disease progression on mFOLFIRINOX-locoregional progression only in 177 patients (55.0%) and distant metastasis in 145 patients (45.0%). The locoregional progression group demonstrated significantly longer post-progression survival (PPS) than that of the distant metastasis group (10.1 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.002). In the locoregional progression group, survival outcomes did not differ between second-line chemoradiation/radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy (progression-free survival with second-line therapy [PFS-2], 3.2 vs. 4.3 months; p = 0.649; PPS, 10.7 vs. 10.2 months; p = 0.791). In patients who received second-line systemic chemotherapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX (n = 211), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was associated with better disease control rates (69.2% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.005) and PFS-2 (3.8 vs. 1.7 months, p = 0.035) than gemcitabine monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed the real-world practice pattern of subsequent therapy and clinical outcomes following progression on first-line mFOLFIRINOX in BRPC and LAPC. Further investigation is necessary to establish the optimal therapy after failure of mFOLFIRINOX.

Successful treatment of a locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer patient with interstitial pneumonitis by conversion surgery following gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy: A case report.

Conversion surgery is an attractive strategy to improve the outcomes for locally advanced unresectable (UR-LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The present case report, presents a case of successful conversion surgery following the treatment of a patient with UR-LA PDAC, suffering from interstitial pneumonitis (IP), using a combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP). A 67-year-old woman presented at the hospital with a high level of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9; 1,713 U/ml). Radiological examination revealed a pancreatic tumor in contact with the superior mesenteric artery, with invasion extending to the most proximal draining jejunal branch into the superior mesenteric vein. The patient was diagnosed with UR-LA PDAC. Following 6 courses of GnP therapy, the tumor size markedly decreased from 50 to 18 mm, and the level of CA19-9 also decreased from 1,713 to 60.1 U/ml. Due to the progression of IP, the patient was administered steroid medication along with a restart of tacrolimus for the treatment of dermatomyositis and IP. After recovery from her lung condition, an additional 3 courses of GnP therapy were administered, and then pancreatoduodenectomy was performed. The patient was still alive 14 months post-surgery with no recurrence. Between July 2009 and September 2017, conversion surgery was performed for 18 cases of UR-LA PDAC treated with gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) therapy, and 11 cases with GnP therapy. The percentage of median CA19-9 and median tumor volume reductions were 73.7 and 51.6%, respectively, following GS therapy, and 86.7 and 68.8%, respectively, following GnP therapy. Tumor reduction following GnP therapy was significantly higher than that after GS therapy (P=0.02). GnP therapy is a suitable regimen to shrink the tumor mass in patients with UR-LA PDAC. Careful management of systemic conditions is required to treat patients with PDAC and IP when using GnP therapy. Conversion surgery should be considered for recognizing radiological responses (tumor shrinkage adjacent to major arteries) and reductions in CA19-9 levels.

Conversion surgery with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer: A case report.

The standard treatment for locally advanced unresectable (UR-LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is chemo-radiotherapy. Surgery following chemo-radiotherapy (conversion surgery), has been considered a useful strategy and has been used for UR-LA PDAC. The current study presents the case of a 43-year-old woman who complained of back pain. A radiological examination revealed a pancreatic tumor in contact with >270 degrees of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) perimeter, with invasion extending from the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) to the portal vein (PV). An endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy revealed adenocarcinoma as the pathological diagnosis and the patient was diagnosed with UR-LA PDAC. Following 12 courses of combined gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for 9 months, the extent of tumor invasion to the SMA and SMV was improved and the level of cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 decreased. A pancreatoduodenectomy with PV resection and reconstruction using a left renal vein graft were performed. Pathological examination revealed that the operative outcome was R0 (no residual tumor) resection and the patient was alive 19 months after the initial treatment (9 months post surgery), however, there was local tumor recurrence. Between March 2015 and February 2016 a total of 10 cases of UR-LA PDAC were encountered at the Department of General Surgery, Chiba University Hospital (Chiba, Japan), in which GnP therapy was performed. Including the present case, 6 of the 11 cases (55%) underwent conversion surgery with curative resection. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients treated with conversion surgery presented significantly longer overall survival (OS) than those treated with no conversion surgery (median OS, 22.5 vs. 11 months; P=0.047, Wilcoxon test). The minimum reduction of CA19-9 was 67%. In conclusion, conversion surgery following GnP therapy is a desirable option for UR-LA PDAC. A significant reduction in the CA19-9 levels may be useful in determining the timing of changeover from medicine to surgery in patients with UR-LA PDAC in whom conversion surgery is being considered.