Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Combined Treatment Using the mTOR-Inhibitor Everolimus and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in Nude CD1 Mice with SSTR-Expressing Pancreatic AR42J Xenograft Tumors.

Therapy options for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) include the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, however further optimization in the therapeutic landscape is required as response rates are still low. In this study, we investigated the synergistic and potentially enhanced efficacy of a combined treatment with everolimus and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in a mouse model. Baseline [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET scans were obtained five days after athymic CD1 mice were inoculated with AR42J tumor cells, before separating the animals into four groups. Group 1 received a placebo, group 2 everolimus, group 3 a placebo and PRRT, and group 4 everolimus and PRRT. The treatment response was monitored by manually measuring the tumor volumes (manual tumor volume, MTV) and conducting sequential [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET scans at one, two, and four weeks after treatment induction. The biological tumor volume (BTV) was derived from PET scans using threshold-based volume of interest (VOI) measurements. Tracer uptake was measured semi-quantitatively as a tumor to background ratio (TBR). Mice were euthanized due to excessive tumor growth according to the ethics protocol; blood samples were drawn for the preparation of full blood counts and kidneys were obtained for histological analysis. For the histological assessment, a standardized score (renal damage score, RDS) was used. Full blood counts showed significantly increased numbers of neutrophils and lymphocytes in the groups receiving PRRT. All other parameters did not differ relevantly. In the histological analysis, groups receiving PRRT had a significantly higher RDS, whereas everolimus only tended to cause an increase in the RDS. Mice in groups 1 and 2 had to be euthanized due to excessive tumor growth two weeks after the start of the therapy, whereas follow-up in groups 3 and 4 comprised four weeks. PRRT significantly inhibited tumor growth; the administration of everolimus did not induce an additional effect. A good correlation existed between MTV and BTV. PRRT significantly reduced the TBR. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET is suitable for monitoring tumor growth in the applied model. The high efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is not enhanced by the combination with everolimus.

Manual on the proper use of lutetium-177-labeled somatostatin analogue (Lu-177-DOTA-TATE) injectable in radionuclide therapy (2nd ed.).

Here we present the guideline for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors using Lu-177-DOTA-TATE on the basis of radiation safety aspects in Japan. This guideline was prepared by a study supported by Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, and approved by Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. Lu-177-DOTA-TATE treatment in Japan should be carried out according to this guideline. Although this guideline is applied in Japan, the issues for radiation protection shown in this guideline are considered internationally useful as well. Only the original Japanese version is the formal document.

Neuroendocrine tumors: a focus on liver metastatic lesions.

Transhepatic radionuclide infusion has been introduced as a new treatment approach for unresectable liver neuroendocrine metastatic lesions with the prerequisite of a positive In-111 Pentetreotide (Octreoscan). Patients with multiple liver neuroendocrine metastases can be locally treated after selective hepatic artery catheterization and infusion of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, and in case of extra-hepatic secondary spread, after simple i.v. application. According to the world wide references, the average dose per session to each patient is 6.3 ± 0.3 GBq (∼160-180 mCi) of In-111-DTPA-Phe1-Pentetreotide, 10- to 12-fold in total, administered monthly or of 4.1 ± 0.2 GBq (∼105-116 mCi) of Y-90 DOTA TOC, threefold in total, or of 7.0 ± 0.4 GBq (∼178-200 mCi) of Lu-177 DOTA TATE, fourfold to sixfold in total (the choice of which being based on the tumor size, assessed by CT or MRI). Follow-up at monthly intervals has to be performed by means of ultrasonography (US). Treatment response has to be assessed according to the WHO criteria (RECIST or SWOG).