Size-matching in lung transplantation by computed tomography for end-stage interstitial disease: a retrospective analysis.

Background: Size matching between donors and recipients is a major issue in lung transplantation (LTx), especially in patients with restrictive lung disease (RLD). This study aims to evaluate computed tomography (CT) as an additional method for defining the total lung capacity (TLC) in patients with end-stage interstitial disease awaiting LTx. Methods: Clinical data and CT scans from patients who underwent a first LTx from January 2014 to July 2018 in Bichat Hospital, Paris, were prospectively included in a database. CT TLC (ctTLC) was retrospectively calculated after semi-automatic contouring of the parenchyma and compared with measured TLC (mTLC) and predicted TLC (pTLC) values. Results: The study group included 89 patients (male:female =68:21; mean age, 59.5±10.0 years). The time between pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and CT scan was 162±270 days [median, 67 days; interquartile range (IQR), 0-233 days]. ctTLC was inferior to mTLC and pTLC (respectively 2,979±1,001 mL, 3,530±1,077 and 6,381±955 mL, P<0.001). The relative difference between CT lung volume (ctLV) and measured lung volume (mLV) was higher on the left than on the right side (25.4% vs. 16.3%, respectively, P=0.11). After exclusion of two outliers, we found a significant correlation between ctTLC and mTLC (r=0.762, P<0.001). Conclusions: CT volume is a feasible method to assess TLC in patients with end-stage interstitial disease awaiting LTx. This study highlights potential size-mismatch for graft selection before LTx and opens the perspective of a prospective trial evaluating impact of size-matching by donor-recipient (D-R) ctTLC ratio on postoperative outcomes.

The efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation training program for patients after lung transplantation.

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation is recognized widely as one of the most effective measures to promote postoperative recovery of lung transplant recipients (LTRs), and it has positive effects on both short- and long-term quality of life (QoL) and survival outcomes. However, no standardized pulmonary rehabilitation training programs exist specifically for LTRs. The pulmonary rehabilitation programs widely used in clinical practice focus mainly on exercise or respiratory training, to some extent neglecting other therapeutic methods that could promote patient health, such as nutrition support, pain control, spiritual comfort, and so on. This study aimed to develop a postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation training program for LTRs and evaluate its effectiveness. Methods: Using convenience sampling, all patients who underwent lung transplantation (LTx) at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria, and a total of 68 patients were finally included in this study. A non-synchronous quasi-experimental design was used, with patients who underwent LTx in 2021 as the control group and patients who underwent LTx in 2022 as the experimental group. The control group received routine treatment, health education, and rehabilitation guidance when patients determined the date of surgery. In addition to this, the experimental group received pulmonary rehabilitation training. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (pulmonary infections), duration of chest tube drainage, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, postoperative pain scores, postoperative QoL, pulmonary function, oxygenation index, and the distance in the 6-minute walking test (6MWD) were compared between the two groups. Results: The length of ICU stay and duration of chest tube drainage in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, and the results of oxygenation index, 6MWD, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (reflecting the QoL) were better than those of the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the pain of the two groups 1 week after surgery and 3 months after surgery, and the pain score of the experimental group was lower than that of the control group at 1 month after surgery (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: The postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation training program for LTRs is safe and effective. It can shorten both the duration of chest tube drainage and ICU stay, it can also improve patients' exercise capacity and pulmonary function while also promote safety outcomes of LTRs, and improve QoL scores.

Complications related to extracorporeal life support in lung transplantation: single-center analysis.

Background: Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is not routinely used at our center during sequential single-lung transplantation (LTx), but is restricted to anticipate and overcome hemodynamic and respiratory problems occurring peri-operatively. In this retrospective descriptive cohort study, we aim to describe our single-center experience with ECLS in LTx, analyzing ECLS-related complications. Methods: All transplantations with peri-operative ECLS use [2010-2020] were retrospectively analyzed. Multi-organ and heart-lung transplantation were excluded. Demographics, support type and indications are described. Complications are categorized according to the underlying nature and type. Data are presented as median [interquartile range (IQR)]. Kaplan-Meier was used for survival analysis. Results: The overall use of ECLS was 22% (156/703 patients) with a mean age of 52 years (IQR, 36-59 years). Transplant indications in ECLS cohort were interstitial lung disease (38%; n=60), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (19%; n=29), cystic fibrosis (17%; n=26) and others (26%; n=41). Per indication, 94% (15/16) of pulmonary arterial hypertension patients required ECLS, whereas only 8% (29/382) of COPD patients did. In 16% (25/156) of supported patients, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was initiated, while 77% (120/156) required veno-arterial support, and 7% (11/156) cardiopulmonary bypass. Thirty-day mortality was 6% (9/156). Sixteen percent (25/156) of patients were bridged to transplantation on ECLS and 24% (37/156) required post-operative support. Main reasons to use ECLS were intra-operative hemodynamic instability (53%; n=82), ventilation/oxygenation problems (22%; n=34) and reperfusion edema (17%; n=26). Overall incidence of patients with at least one ECLS-related complication was 67% (n=104). Most common complications were hemothorax (25%; n=39), need for continuous renal replacement therapy (19%; n=30), and thromboembolism (14%; n=22). Conclusions: ECLS was required in 22% of LTxs, with a reported ECLS-related complication rate of 67%, of which the most common was hemothorax. Larger databases are needed to further analyze complications and develop tailored deployment strategies for ECLS-use in LTx.

Update in lung transplantation: anesthetic considerations.

The field of lung transplantation (LTx) has expanded rapidly since its inception in the early 1960s with the work of James Hardy and colleagues at the University of Mississippi from the work of local single specialty physicians into an international multidisciplinary specialty. Advancements throughout the next several decades have led to the completion of over 70,000 lung transplants worldwide. The unique challenges presented by patients with end-stage lung disease have both evolved and remained consistent since then, yet these challenges are being answered with major improvements and advancements in perioperative care in the 21st century. The current practice of LTx medicine is fundamentally multidisciplinary, and members of the LTx team includes surgeons, physicians, and allied health staff. The integration of anesthesiologists into the LTx team as well as the multidisciplinary nature of LTx necessitates anesthetic considerations to be closely incorporated into emerging surgical, medical, and systems techniques for patient care. This review discusses a host of emerging strategies across the spectrum of LTx, including efforts to expand the donor pool, utilization of perioperative extracorporeal life support, perioperative echocardiography, and anesthetic techniques to mitigate primary graft dysfunction that have all contributed to improved long term outcomes in LTx patients.

Comparative outcomes of lung volume reduction surgery and lung transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Lung volume reduction (LVR) and lung transplantation (LTx) have been used in different populations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. To date, comparative study of LVR and LTx has not been performed. We sought to address this gap by pooling the existing evidence in the literature. Methods: An electronic search was performed to identify all prospective studies on LVR and LTx published since 2000. Baseline characteristics, perioperative variables, and clinical outcomes were extracted and pooled for meta-analysis. Results: The analysis included 65 prospective studies comprising 3,671 patients [LTx: 15 studies (n=1,445), LVR: 50 studies (n=2,226)]. Mean age was 60 [95% confidence interval (CI): 58-62] years and comparable between the two groups. Females were 51% (95% CI: 30-71%) in the LTx group vs. 28% (95% CI: 21-36%) in LVR group (P=0.05). Baseline 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and pulmonary function tests were comparable except for the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), which was lower in the LTx group [21.8% (95% CI: 16.8-26.7%) vs. 27.3% (95% CI: 25.5-29.2%), P=0.04]. Postoperatively, both groups experienced improved FEV1, however post-LTx FEV1 was significantly higher than post-LVR FEV1 [54.9% (95% CI: 41.4-68.4%) vs. 32.5% (95% CI: 30.1-34.8%), P<0.01]. 6MWT was also improved after both procedures [LTx: 212.9 (95% CI: 119.0-306.9) to 454.4 m (95% CI: 334.7-574.2), P<0.01; LVR: 286 (95% CI: 270.2-301.9) to 409.1 m (95% CI: 392.1-426.0), P<0.01], however, with no significant difference between the groups. Pooled survival over time showed no significant difference between the groups. Conclusions: LTx results in better FEV1 but otherwise has comparable outcomes to LVR.

Management of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation with extracorporeal life support: an evidence-based review.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is a complex inflammatory syndrome that can lead to respiratory failure after lung transplantation (LTx). The pathogenesis of PGD is multifactorial and can be driven by attributes of both the donor and recipient, perioperative characteristics, and technical handling of the graft. Despite significant advancements in patient and donor selection, perioperative management and surgical technique, PGD is still a major contributor to morbidity and mortality after lung transplant. Although there are no known durable treatment options for PGD after LTx, an increasing body of evidence and experience in high-volume lung transplant centers show that extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is a reliable option for both preventing PGD and supporting critically ill patients with PGD. Both veno-venous (V-V) ECLS and veno-arterial (V-A) ECLS are proven and feasible strategies for mitigating the morbidity and mortality associated with post-LTx PGD. In this evidence-based review, we provide an overview of the epidemiology and physiology of PGD as well as a growing body of data that supports ECLS as a major tool to manage PGD. We describe the role of ECMO in PGD prevention and management, worldwide outcomes of LTx with ECLS support, and outline our step-wise approach to managing this complex respiratory syndrome leading up to institution of ECLS.

Intra-subject variability in oscillometry correlates with acute rejection and CLAD post-lung transplant.

Background: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major cause of death post-lung transplantation, with acute cellular rejection (ACR) being the biggest contributing risk factor. Although patients are routinely monitored with spirometry, FEV1 is stable or improving in most ACR episodes. In contrast, oscillometry is highly sensitive to respiratory mechanics and shown to track graft injury associated with ACR and its improvement following treatment. We hypothesize that intra-subject variability in oscillometry measurements correlates with ACR and risk of CLAD. Methods: Of 289 bilateral lung recipients enrolled for oscillometry prior to laboratory-based spirometry between December 2017 and March 2020, 230 had ≥ 3 months and 175 had ≥ 6 months of follow-up. While 37 patients developed CLAD, only 29 had oscillometry at time of CLAD onset and were included for analysis. These 29 CLAD patients were time-matched with 129 CLAD-free recipients. We performed multivariable regression to investigate the associations between variance in spirometry/oscillometry and the A-score, a cumulative index of ACR, as our predictor of primary interest. Conditional logistic regression models were built to investigate associations with CLAD. Results: Multivariable regression showed that the A-score was positively associated with the variance in oscillometry measurements. Conditional logistic regression models revealed that higher variance in the oscillometry metrics of ventilatory inhomogeneity, X5, AX, and R5-19, was independently associated with increased risk of CLAD (p < 0.05); no association was found for variance in %predicted FEV1. Conclusion: Oscillometry tracks graft injury and recovery post-transplant. Monitoring with oscillometry could facilitate earlier identification of graft injury, prompting investigation to identify treatable causes and decrease the risk of CLAD.

Clinical relevance of cell-free DNA quantification and qualification during the first month after lung transplantation.

Background: Many studies have reported the relevance of donor-derived cfDNA (dd-cfDNA) after lung transplantation (LTx) to diagnose and monitor acute rejection (AR) or chronic rejection or infection (INF). However, the analysis of cfDNA fragment size has not been studied. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical relevance of dd-cfDNA and cfDNA size profiles in events (AR and INF) during the first month after LTx. Methods: This prospective, single-center study includes 62 LTx recipients at the Marseille Nord Hospital, France. Total cfDNA quantification was performed by fluorimetry and digital PCR, dd-cfDNA by NGS (AlloSeq cfDNA-CareDX®), and the size profile by BIABooster (Adelis®). A bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial biopsies at D30 established the following groups: not-injured and injured graft (AR, INF, or AR+INF). Results: Quantification of total cfDNA was not correlated with the patient's status at D30. The percentage of dd-cfDNA was significantly higher for injured graft patients at D30 (p=0.0004). A threshold of 1.72% of dd-cfDNA correctly classified the not-injured graft patients (negative predictive value of 91.4%). Among recipients with dd-cfDNA >1.72%, the quantification of small sizes (80-120bp) >3.70% identified the INF with high performance (specificity and positive predictive value of 100%). Conclusion: With the aim of considering cfDNA as a polyvalent non-invasive biomarker in transplantation, an algorithm combining the quantification of dd-cfDNA and small sizes of DNA may significantly classify the different types of allograft injuries.

Lung recruitment after cardiac arrest during procurement of atelectatic donor lungs is a protective measure in lung transplantation.

Background: Brain-dead donors are susceptible to pulmonary atelectasis (AT). In procurement surgery, lung recruitment under circulatory conditions and cold-flushing for atelectatic donor lungs often provoke graft injury due to the acute blood inflow. We hypothesized that lung recruitment without blood circulation can mitigate graft injury. This study aimed to examine the benefits of lung recruitment subsequent to cardiac arrest using a porcine lung-transplant model. Methods: Thirteen donor pigs were categorized into the non-atelectatic (No-AT) group (n=3) representing a healthy control group; AT-BCR group (n=5), in which AT was reverted by conventional blood-circulated recruitment (BCR); and AT-no-BCR group (n=5), in which AT was reverted by no-BCR following circulatory arrest. In the atelectatic donor models, the left main bronchus was ligated for 24 hours prior to lung procurement. Left lung transplantation (LTx) was subsequently performed in the thirteen recipient pigs. After 6 hours evaluation, the recipients were euthanized and the lung grafts were excised. Results: The post-transplant PaO2/FiO2 ratio was significantly higher in the AT-no-BCR group than in the AT-BCR group (P=0.015). Wet/dry ratio, histological findings of graft injury and tissue interleukin-8 expression in the AT-no-BCR group were similar to those of the No-AT group. Conclusions: Lung recruitment without circulation after circulatory arrest could be more protective for atelectatic donor lung than the conventional procedure.

Safety and efficacy of an implantable device for management of gastroesophageal reflux in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a promising minimally invasive surgical technique for management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, device implantation after transplantation has not been studied and may be concerning in these immunosuppressed patients. We explored the safety of the LINX Reflux Management System (MSA device) for management of GERD following lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: Lung transplant recipients who underwent LINX implantation at our institution between 2017 and 2019 were followed prospectively in the Reflux Following Lung Transplantation and Associated Treatment Registry. Ambulatory pH testing and acid-suppressing medication use were compared before and after LINX implantation. One-year outcomes and change in pulmonary function were compared between matched LINX and fundoplication groups. RESULTS: Of 17 patients who underwent post-lung transplant LINX implantation, 8 (47.1%) agreed to undergo post-LINX pH testing. Three/eight (37.5%) patients achieved normal esophageal acid exposure time; 14 (82.4%) remained on acid-suppressing medication at one-year under the direction of their transplant teams. One-year patient survival and change in pulmonary function were similar between groups. LINX patients experienced more early side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the LINX MSA device in a cohort of lung transplant recipients at our institution was associated with similar short-term safety compared to traditional fundoplication, however assessment of efficacy was limited. Further investigation is needed to characterize the long-term efficacy of LINX implantation after LTx.

The effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in connection with lung transplantation in Hungary.

BACKGROUND: The role of pre- and post-lung transplant rehabilitation is to maintain or improve exercise tolerance, lung mechanics, peripheral and respiratory muscle function. Our aim was to measure the effectiveness of pre- and post-transplant rehabilitation in terms of the changes of functional and quality of life markers. METHODS: Sixty-three patients (40 COPD FEV1: 21±5%pred, 18 IPF TLC: 42±13%pred, 4 bronchiectasis FEV1: 28±4%pred and 1 alveolitis fibrotisans TLC: 31%pred) participated in a pre- and 14 took part in a post-transplant rehabilitation program (more than 2 months after lung transplantation (LTx), primary diagnoses: 9 COPD, 4 IPF). The rehabilitation program consisted of chest-wall stretching, controlled breathing techniques and personalized exercise of 20-30 minutes by cycling and treadmill 2-3 times per day for 4 weeks. Seven functional and quality of life markers, like lung function, chest wall expansion (CWE), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), breath holding time (BHT) and hand grip strength (HGS) were measured at the onset and the end of the rehabilitation program. The safety profile of the rehabilitation program was followed-up. RESULTS: Pre-transplant pulmonary rehabilitation resulted in significant improvement in CWE (3.24±1.49 vs. 4.48±1.62 cm), CAT IQR {19 [13-25] vs. 15 [11-21]}, 6MWD (315±118 vs. 375±114 m), P<0.05. FEV1, FVC, mMRC, BHT and HGS did not change significantly. Post-transplant rehabilitation resulted in significant improvement in CWE (3.7±2.1 vs. 6.2±1.8 cm), CAT IQR {17 [11-23] vs. 10 [6-14], BHT (22±14 vs. 35±16 s), FEV1 (73±8 vs. 86±9%pred) and FVC (70±12 vs. 85±14%pred), P<0.05. The 6MWD, mMRC and HGS did not change significantly. No cardiovascular or other side effects were detected during the rehabilitation program. CONCLUSIONS: Our results underline the importance of perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation in the complex treatment of lung transplant patients in Hungary, as well. There was a limitation because no control group was evaluated without rehabilitation.

Intraoperative support during lung transplantation.

The role of intraoperative mechanical support during lung transplantation (LTx) is essential to provide a safe hemodynamic and ventilatory status during critical intraoperative events. This hemodynamic and ventilatory stability is vital to minimize the odds of suboptimal outcomes, especially considering that, due to the scarcity of donors and the fact that more and more patients with significant comorbidities are being considered for this therapy, a more aggressive approach is often needed by the transplant centers. Hence, the attenuation of any potential injury that can happen during this complex event is paramount. While a thorough assessment of the donor and optimization of postoperative care is pursued, certainly protective intraoperative management would also contribute to better outcomes. Understanding each patient's underlying anatomy and cardiopulmonary physiology, associated with awareness of critical events during a complicated procedure like LTx, is essential for a precise indication and safe use of support. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) have been the most common approaches used, with the latter gaining popularity more recently and we have used VA ECMO exclusively for the last decade. New technologies certainly contributed to more liberal use of VA ECMO intraoperatively, enabling a protecting and physiologic environment for the newly implanted grafts. In this setting, potential prophylactic use for lung protection during a critical period is also considered.

Usefulness of a preoperative inflammatory marker as a predictor of asymptomatic acute rejection after lung transplantation: a Japanese single-institution study.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance bronchoscopy (SB) is performed as routine follow-up after lung transplantation (LTx), primarily for the early detection of clinically asymptomatic acute rejection (AR). To identify appropriate candidates for SB over a long period, we explored risk factors of asymptomatic AR after LTx. METHOD: This study is a single-center and retrospective cohort study. Forty-five patients underwent cadaveric LTx between 2000 and 2016 in our institution. All enrolled patients had at least three months of follow-up. SB is scheduled at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after LTx routinely and annually thereafter until 5 years after LTx. A histological assessment for AR was performed according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria. The analysis of potential risk factors for AR was performed using a chi-square test and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The median period of follow-up after LTx for the entire cohort was 64 months. Asymptomatic AR (grade A1-A3) was detected in 22 patients, 14 of whom showed severe AR (worse than grade A2). The percentage of patients with AR was 5-24% at each time point, and 15% of patients still showed severe AR (A2 and A3) at 24 months after LTx. Potential risk factors included recipient factors (diagnosis, age, gender, BMI), donor factors (age, gender, smoking history, cause of brain death), HLA mismatch, operation-related factors, neutrophil-to-leucocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-leucocyte ratio (PLR), and other scores. Patients with a higher NLR showed a higher incidence of AR after LTx than others during follow-up (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: An increased perioperative NLR was significantly associated with a higher odds ratio of AR during follow-up. Patients with a high NLR seem to be good candidates for long-term SB.

Rat lung transplantation model: modifications of the cuff technique.

BACKGROUND: Although the cuff technique in rat lung transplantation (LTx) has a long history, it remains technically challenging. We have developed key tricks and modifications in the devices and the cuff technique that optimize the rat LTx model to achieve successful operations during a short learning period. METHODS: Altogether, 180 consecutive rats underwent orthotopic left LTx performed by a single surgeon using our modified devices and procedures. Allogeneic and syngeneic transplantation were performed using Lewis rats as recipients and Brown Norway and Lewis rats as donors. Allogeneic recipients were treated with cyclosporine during the first week. Recipients were sacrificed at various time points after ≥2 weeks. RESULTS: A special cuff-preparation plate was created using a petri dish and two foam blocks. This modified plate stabilizes the preparation and prevents donor lung compression. A "┴"-shaped incision was carved into the front wall of the pulmonary artery (PA) using micro-scissors. "V"-shaped incisions were made from the inferior-to-superior branches of the pulmonary vein (PV) and bronchus. A "pendulum model" was applied at implantation to make the hilar anastomosis tension-free and technically easier to perform. There were no intraoperative complications. Ten rats (5.6%) experienced partial or full pulmonary atelectasis. Five deaths (2.8%) due to pleural effusion occurred during the follow-up period. The operative times for heart-lung block retrieval, cuff preparation, cold ischemia, warm ischemia, and total procedure time were 8.4±0.8, 11.6±1.5, 25.1±2.2, 8.1±1.2, and 46.7±2.8 min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The key tricks and improvements we made in the cuff technique for rat LTx provided the advantages of expeditiousness, a low complication rate, and a high success rate.

Timing it right: the challenge of recipient selection for lung transplantation.

Selection criteria for the referral and potential listing of patients for lung transplantation (LTx) have changed considerably over the last three decades but one key maxim prevails, the ultimate focus is to increase longevity and quality of life by careful utilization of a rare and precious resource, the donor organs. In this article, we review how the changes have developed and the outcomes of those changes, highlighting the impact of the lung allocation score (LAS) system. Major diseases, including interstitial lung disease (ILD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary hypertension are considered in detail as well as the concept of retransplantation where appropriate. Results from bridging to LTx using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are discussed and other potential contraindications evaluated such as advanced age, frailty and resistant infections. Given the multiplicity of risk factors it is a credit to those working in the field that such excellent and improving results are obtained with an ongoing dedication to achieving best practice.

An update on chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a significant challenge and the major determinant of morbidity and mortality post lung transplantation (LTx). The definition of CLAD has evolved significantly over the last ten years, reflecting better understanding of pathophysiology and different phenotypes. While there is an agreed consensus approach to CLAD, questions remain regarding the limitations of lung function parameters as well as the role of imaging and histopathology. Here we present a current snapshot of the definition of CLAD, its evolution and future directions.

Preoperative risk factors for successful extubation or not after lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to uncover preoperative risk factors for extubation failure or re-intubation for patients undergoing lung transplant (LTx). METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study of LTx from our center between January 2017 and March 2019. Demographic and preoperative characteristics were collected for all included patients. Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to analyze risk factors of postoperative unsuccessful extubation following LTx. RESULTS: Among 107 patients undergoing first LTx investigated, 74 (69.16%) patients who were successfully liberated from mechanical ventilation (MV), and 33 (30.84%) patients who were unsuccessful extubation, which 18 (16.82%) patients suffered from reintubation. associated preoperative factors for unsuccessful extubation following LTx included preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support [OR =4.631, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.403-15.286, P=0.012], the preoperative ability of independent expectoration (OR =4.517, 95% CI: 1.498-13.625, P=0.007), the age older than 65-year-old (OR =4.039, 95% CI: 1.154-14.139, P=0.029), and receiving the double lung and heart-LTx (OR =3.390, 95% CI: 0.873-13.162, P=0.078; and OR =16.579, 95% CI: 2.586-106.287, P=0.012, respectively). Further, we investigated the preoperative predicted factors for reintubation. Only the preoperative ECMO remained a significant predictor of re-intubation (OR =4.69, 95% CI: 1.56-15.286, P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative independent sputum clearance, preoperative ECMO, older than 65-year-old, and double lung or heart-LTx were four independent risk factors for unsuccessful extubation. Moreover, preoperative ECMO was the only independent risk factor for reintubation.

The prognostic value of peak arterial lactate levels within 72 h of lung transplantation in identifying patient outcome.

BACKGROUND: Lactic acidosis is often seen in lung transplantation (LTx). Postoperative lactate is frequently associated with poor outcome in postoperative and critically ill patients. Our aim was to evaluate the predictive value of postoperative peak lactate levels within 72 h of LTx for 30-day and late mortality. METHODS: We evaluated patients who underwent LTx from January 2015 to September 2017. All admitted patients were classified according to the peak lactate level (PL) within 72 h of surgery: PL <5 mmol/L (Group 1); PL =5-10 mmol/L (Group 2), and PL >10 mmol/L (Group 3). We performed logistic regression analysis and used Cox regression models to identify the peak lactate level as a predictive factor for 30-day and late mortality, respectively. RESULTS: Of 255 eligible patients, mean age 55.61±12.16, mean lactate 4.99±2.93 and 80% male, and 40% had hyperlactatemia (PL >5 mmol/L) after LTx. The 30-day mortality rate was 17.9%, 28.9% and 68.8% in the three groups, respectively (P<0.05). Multivariate regression analyses revealed postoperative PL as a notable predictor of 30-day mortality [odds ratio =2.62 (1.42-4.84), P=0.002] as well as for late mortality [hazard ratio =2.70 (1.13-6.42), P=0.025]. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative peak lactate level within 72 h of surgery was an independent predictor for 30-day and late mortality in LTx patients.

Lung transplant with bronchial arterial revascularization: review of surgical technique and clinical outcomes.

Lung transplantation (LTx) is routinely performed with sacrifice of the bronchial arterial circulation. We review bronchial artery anatomy and surgical technique for LTx with direct bronchial arterial revascularization (BAR). We also update the published clinical experience, including from our center, of LTx with BAR. Published series of LTx with BAR are from single centers, and all cite high technical success rates and good short-term outcomes. Technically, double LTx (DLTx) with BAR is almost always possible if a deliberate review of bronchial artery anatomy is performed. For single LTx (SLTx), BAR is feasible in about 50% of cases. The combined Copenhagen and Cleveland Clinic experience (with BAR procedures performed or supervised by Dr. Gosta B. Pettersson) includes 131 LTx with BAR with a technical success rate >95%. Procedural success is uniformly associated with normal airway healing. Five-year survival in LTx with BAR is superior to the 5-year survival of LTx patients in the ISHLT registry. LTx with BAR is feasible and safe, and technical success ensures normal airway healing. The experience with BAR at experienced centers suggests possible long-term survival benefit. A multicenter study is needed to define the role of BAR in LTx.

The technique of intraoperative axillary artery cannulation for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: To show our experiences of using the axillary artery with a side graft as a cannulation technique for the inflow of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in lung transplantation (LTx). This method can avoid complications associated with central and femoral vessel cannulation techniques, and be convenient for the use of intraoperative ECMO into the early postoperative period. METHODS: Between November 2016 and July 2017, we established intraoperative V/A-ECMO in 32 patients. Among these patients, 5 patients were performed on via axillary artery-percutaneous femoral vein cannulation (15.6%), 2 patients were performed on with veno-venous ECMO (V/V-ECMO) as a bridge to transplantation with hemodynamic instability during transplantation, and additional axillary artery cannulations were performed to establish veno-veno-arterial (V/V/A) ECMO. Mean age was 45.2±10.1 years (range, 26-71 years). RESULTS: In 7 patients undergoing ECMO support during operation, the ECMO was removed in 4 patients immediately after the procedure, 3 patients with "prolonged ECMO" were transferred to the ICU. There were no ECMO-related complications and no patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Our protocol for V/A-ECMO cannulation that uses the axillary artery for arterial cannulation provides a safe and improved means for delivering V/A-ECMO support during LTx. Also, it is helpful for prolonging the intraoperative ECMO in the early postoperative period.