A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Luseogliflozin on Bone Microarchitecture Evaluated Using HR-pQCT in Elderly Type 2 Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Bone fragility is a critical issue in the treatment of elderly people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In the Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study, the subjects with T2D who were treated with canagliflozin showed a significant increase in fracture events compared to a placebo group as early as 12 weeks post-initiation. In addition, it has been unclear whether sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors promote bone fragility. We used high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) to prospectively evaluate the short-term effect of the SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin on bone strength and microarchitecture in elderly people with T2D. METHODS: This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, active-controlled pilot trial for ≥ 60-year-old Japanese individuals with T2D without osteoporosis. A total of 22 subjects (seven women and 15 men) were randomly assigned to a Lusefi group (added luseogliflozin 2.5 mg) or a control group (added metformin 500 mg) and treated for 48 weeks. We used the second-generation HR-pQCT (Xtreme CT II®, Scanco Medical, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) before and 48 weeks after the treatment to evaluate the subjects' bone microarchitecture and estimate their bone strength. RESULTS: Twenty subjects (Lusefi group, n = 9; control group, n = 11) completed the study, with no fracture events. As the primary outcome, the 48-week changes in the bone strength (stiffness and failure load) estimated by micro-finite element analysis were not significantly different between the groups. As the secondary outcome, the changes in all of the cortical/trabecular microarchitectural parameters at the radius and tibia from baseline to 48 weeks were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the pilot trial, we observed no negative effect of 48-week luseogliflozin treatment on bone microarchitecture or bone strength in elderly people with T2D. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR no. 000036202 and jRCT 071180061.

Effects of luseogliflozin on suspected MASLD in patients with diabetes: a pooled meta-analysis of phase III clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Luseogliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, potentially exerts pleiotropic effects on the liver. However, the sufficient evidence is still lacking. We aimed to investigate the effects of luseogliflozin on hepatic steatosis, fibrosis, and cardiometabolic risk factors in diabetic patients by a pooled meta-analysis. METHODS: In this pooled meta-analysis, we enrolled diabetic patients who participated in phase III clinical trials of luseogliflozin (luseogliflozin group n = 302, placebo group n = 191). The primary outcomes were changes in fatty liver index (FLI) and Hepamet fibrosis score (HFS) after 24 weeks. The secondary outcomes were changes in cardiometabolic risk factors after 24 weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using propensity scoring analysis by the inverse probability of treatment weighting method. RESULTS: Primary outcomes: Luseogliflozin significantly decreased FLI compared to placebo after 24 weeks (adjusted coefficient - 5.423, 95%CI - 8.760 to - 2.086, P = 0.0016). There was no significant difference in changes in HFS between the two groups. However, luseogliflozin significantly decreased HFS compared to placebo in diabetic patients with ALT > 30 U/L (adjusted coefficient - 0.039, 95%CI - 0.077 to - 0.001, P = 0.0438) and with FIB-4 index > 1.3 (adjusted coefficient - 0.0453, 95%CI - 0.075 to - 0.016, P = 0.0026). Secondary outcom8es: Luseogliflozin significantly decreased HbA1c level, HOMA-IR value, BMI, and uric acids level, and increased HDL cholesterol level compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This pooled meta-analysis demonstrated that 24-week treatment with luseogliflozin improved hepatic steatosis and fibrosis indexes in diabetic patients, especially those with liver injury. Furthermore, luseogliflozin improved various cardiometabolic risk factors. Thus, luseogliflozin may be useful for improving MASLD in diabetic patients.

Efficacy and safety of luseogliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Owing to the absence of the most recent evidence on the efficacy and safety of luseogliflozin, our study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of luseogliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A comprehensive search of electronic databases like PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar was performed from the inception to the 31st of August 2023 to identify the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the glucose and body weight lowering efficacy and safety outcomes of luseogliflozin in comparison with control or other active treatments. The fixed or random-effect model was used based on the heterogeneity identified using the I2 statistic and Cochran's Q test. RESULTS: Out of 50 non-duplicate articles identified through database searching, 8 RCTs (11 studies) with 1922 patients were included in this study. The efficacy outcomes like HbA1c (MD: -0.59%; 95% CI: -0.90, -0.29; P < 0.001), FPG (MD: -16.01 mg/dL; 95% CI: -19.46, -12.57; P < 0.001), PPG (MD: -36.63 mg/dL; 95% CI: -43.71, -29.55; P < 0.001) and body weight (MD: -1.66 kg; 95% CI: -2.23, -1.12; P < 0.001) were significantly reduced with luseogliflozin compared to the control group. Regarding the safety outcomes, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for hypoglycemia (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.84; P = 0.60). However, pollakiuria (OR: 4.08; 95% CI: 1.71, 9.69; P < 0.001) and any ADRs (OR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.33, 3.14; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the luseogliflozin group compared to the control. CONCLUSION: The current study identified a significant improvement in efficacy outcomes of HbA1c, FPG, PPG, and body weight in the luseogliflozin group. Non-significant safety results may be due to a smaller population size and fewer studies. Hence, long-term multicentric RCTs are needed to identify the safety and efficacy in a diversified population.

Effect of Luseogliflozin, a Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor, and Dipeptidyl-Peptidase 4 Inhibitors on the Quality-of-Life and Treatment Satisfaction of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Subanalysis of a Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized-Controlled Trial (J-SELECT Study).

INTRODUCTION: The effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) on quality of life (QOL) and treatment satisfaction have not been directly compared. This sub-analysis of a randomized-controlled trial with an SGLT2i, luseogliflozin, and DPP-4is compared their effects on QOL and treatment satisfaction of patients. METHODS: This study recruited 623 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were drug-naïve or treated with antidiabetic agents other than SGLT2is and DPP-4is. The patients were randomized into luseogliflozin or DPP-4i group and followed for 52 weeks. This sub-analysis assessed QOL and treatment satisfaction using Oral Hypoglycemic Agent Questionnaire (OHA-Q) version 2 in the drug-naïve subgroup who were drug-naïve at baseline and with monotherapy with luseogliflozin or DPP-4i throughout the observation period (256 patients) at 24 and 52 weeks and in the add-on subgroup who were treated with OHAs other than SGLT2is and DPP-4is (204 patients) at baseline, 24 and 52 weeks. RESULTS: In the drug-naïve subgroup, total (50.8 ± 8.2 in luseogliflozin group and 53.1 ± 10.0 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.048) and somatic symptom scores (22.4 ± 5.0 in luseogliflozin group and 24.4 ± 5.8 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.005) at 52 weeks (but not at 24 weeks) were significantly higher in DPP-4i group than in luseogliflozin group. In add-on subgroup, changes in total (3.3 ± 7.8 in luseogliflozin group and 0.9 ± 7.6 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.030) and treatment convenience (1.2 ± 3.9 in luseogliflozin group and - 0.6 ± 4.2 in DPP-4i group, p = 0.002) from baseline to 24 weeks (but not at 52 weeks) were significantly greater in luseogliflozin group than in DPP-4i group. The QOL related to safety or glycemic control was comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should pay attention to side effects of SGLT2is to maintain the patients' QOL when SGLT2is are initiated or added-on. Add-on of luseogliflozin increased patients' QOL more than DPP-4is. Considering patients' QOL and treatment satisfaction is important for selecting SGLT2is or DPP-4is. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000030128 and jRCTs031180241.

Effect of Luseogliflozin on Myocardial Flow Reserve in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (LUCENT-J Study).

INTRODUCTION: In patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors has been shown to reduce hospital admission rates for heart failure (HF). However, the multiple mechanisms hypothesized and investigated to explain the cardioprotection of SGLT2 inhibitors are not fully understood. OBJECTIVES: The effect of luseogliflozin on myocardial flow reserve (MFR) in patients with T2D (LUCENT-J) study aims to examine the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on myocardial perfusion. METHODS: The LUCENT-J study is a prospective, single-center, randomized, two-arm, parallel-group, open-label (i.e., the radiology readers are blinded), active-controlled study. A cohort of 40 patients with T2D with no or stable (with no history of myocardial infarction and with or without previous percutaneous coronary intervention) coronary artery disease will be included. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to luseogliflozin or control and treated for 24 weeks. The primary outcome is the change in MFR, as measured by 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography/computed tomography, from baseline to 24 weeks after treatment initiation. PLANNED OUTCOMES: The LUCENT-J study will elucidate the mechanisms of cardioprotection by SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with T2D. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (JRCTs051220016).

Overall Efficacy and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Luseogliflozin Versus Dipeptidyl-Peptidase 4 Inhibitors: Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized-Controlled Trial (J-SELECT study).

INTRODUCTION: Evidence of a direct comparison between dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) remains lacking, and no clear treatment strategy or rationale has been established using these drugs. This study aimed to compare the overall efficacy and safety of DPP-4is and the SGLT2i luseogliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: Patients with T2DM who had not used antidiabetic agents or who had used antidiabetic agents other than SGLT2is and DPP-4is were enrolled in the study after written informed consent had been obtained. The enrolled patients were subsequently randomly assigned to either the luseogliflozin or DPP-4i group and followed up for 52 weeks. The primary (composite) endpoint was the proportion of patients who showed improvement in ≥ 3 endpoints among the following five endpoints from baseline to week 52: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), weight, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), systolic blood pressure, and pulse rate. RESULTS: A total of 623 patients were enrolled in the study and subsequently randomized to either the luseogliflozin or DPP-4i groups. The proportion of patients who showed improvement in ≥ 3 endpoints at week 52 was significantly higher in the luseogliflozin group (58.9%) than in the DPP-4i group (35.0%) (p < 0.001). When stratified by body mass index (BMI) (< 25 or ≥ 25 kg/m2) or age (< 65 or ≥ 65 years), regardless of BMI or age, the proportion of patients who achieved the composite endpoint was significantly higher in the luseogliflozin group than in the DPP-4i group. Hepatic function and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol were also significantly improved in the luseogliflozin group compared with the DPP-4i group. The frequency of non-serious/serious adverse events did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed the overall efficacy of luseogliflozin compared with DPP-4is over the mid/long term, regardless of BMI or age. The results suggest the importance of assessing multiple aspects regarding the effects of diabetes management. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs031180241.

Efficacy and safety of luseogliflozin in improving glycaemic and non-glycaemic outcomes in type-2 diabetes: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: No meta-analysis is available analysing the role of luseogliflozin in type-2 diabetes. We undertook this meta-analysis to address this knowledge-gap. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for RCTs involving diabetes patients receiving luseogliflozin in intervention arm, and placebo/active comparator in control arm. Primary outcome was to evaluate changes in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate alterations in glucose, blood pressure, weight, lipids, and adverse events. RESULTS: From initially screened 151 articles, data from 10 RCTs involving 1304 patients was analysed. Individuals receiving luseogliflozin 2.5 mg/d had a significantly lower HbA1c [MD -0.76% (95% CI: 1.01 to -0.51); P < 0.01; I2 = 83%], fasting glucose [MD -26.69 mg/dl (95% CI: 35.41 to -17.96); P < 0.01; I2 = 80%], systolic blood pressure [MD -4.19 mm Hg (95% CI: 6.31 to -2.07); P < 0.01; I2 = 0%], body-weight [MD -1.61 kg (95% CI: 3.14 to -0.08); P = 0.04; I2 = 0%], triglycerides PCG [MD -12.60 mg/dl (95% CI: 24.25 to -0.95); P = 0.03; I2 = 0%], uric acid [MD -0.48 mg/dl (95% CI: 0.73 to -0.23); P < 0.01; I2 = 49%] and alanine aminotransferase [MD -4.11 IU/L (95% CI: 6.12 to -2.10); P < 0.01; I2 = 0%] compared to placebo. Occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse-events [RR 0.93 (95% CI: 0.72-1.20); P = 0.58; I2 = 0%], severe adverse-events [RR 1.19 (95% CI: 0.40-3.55); P = 0.76; I2 = 0%], hypoglycaemia [RR 1.56 (95% CI: 0.85-2.85); P = 0.15; I2 = 0%] and genital infections [RR 1.42 (95% CI: 0.48-4.18); P = 0.53; I2 = 0%] were not increased with luseogliflozin. Cardiovascular outcome trials are lacking and are urgently required. CONCLUSION: Luseogliflozin has good glycaemic and non-glycaemic benefits similar to other SGLT2 inhibitors and is well tolerated.

A Comparative Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Dose Escalation of Luseogliflozin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients With Poor Glycemic Control.

Objective In this study, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the dose escalation of luseogliflozin (LUSEO) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with poor glycemic control. To that end, we compared two groups assigned to two different doses of luseogliflozin (LUSEO) for 12 weeks. Methods Patients with a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7% or higher already on treatment with luseogliflozin 2.5 mg/day for 12 weeks or longer were randomly assigned to either the 2.5-mg/day group (control group) or the 5-mg/day group (dose-escalation group) of luseogliflozin through the envelope method and were treated for 12 weeks. Blood and urine samples were collected at two different time points: at weeks 0 and 12 after randomization. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c from the baseline to 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were changes in the body mass index (BMI), body weight (BW), blood pressure (BP), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), lipid parameters, hepatic function, or renal function from the baseline to 12 weeks. Results Based on our findings, HbA1c levels significantly decreased in the dose-escalation group when compared to the control group (p<0.001) at week 12. Conclusion For T2DM patients with poor glycemic control under treatment with LUSEO at a dose of 2.5 mg, dose escalation of LUSEO to 5 mg safely improved glycemic control, and this might prove to be an effective and safe treatment option.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors and kidney fibrosis: review of the current evidence and related mechanisms.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) are a new class of anti-diabetic drugs that have beneficial cardiovascular and renal effects. These drugs decrease proximal tubular glucose reabsorption and decrease blood glucose levels as a main anti-diabetic action. Furthermore, SGLT2i decreases glomerular hyperfiltration by a tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism. However, the renal benefits of these agents are independent of glucose-lowering and hemodynamic factors, and SGLT2i also impacts the kidney structure including kidney fibrosis. Renal fibrosis is a common pathway and pathological marker of virtually every type of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and amelioration of renal fibrosis is of utmost importance to reduce the progression of CKD. Recent studies have shown that SGLT2i impact many cellular processes including inflammation, hypoxia, oxidative stress, metabolic functions, and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) which all are related with kidney fibrosis. Indeed, most but not all studies showed that renal fibrosis was ameliorated by SGLT2i through the reduction of inflammation, hypoxia, oxidative stress, and RAS activation. In addition, less known effects on SGLT2i on klotho expression, capillary rarefaction, signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling and peptidylprolyl cis/trans isomerase (Pin1) levels may partly explain the anti-fibrotic effects of SGLT2i in kidneys. It is important to remember that some studies have not shown any beneficial effects of SGLT2i on kidney fibrosis. Given this background, in the current review, we have summarized the studies and pathophysiologic aspects of SGL2 inhibition on renal fibrosis in various CKD models and tried to explain the potential reasons for contrasting findings.

Gut Microbiota Changes by an SGLT2 Inhibitor, Luseogliflozin, Alters Metabolites Compared with Those in a Low Carbohydrate Diet in db/db Mice.

In recent years, sarcopenic obesity has been considered central pathological factors in diabetes. This study aimed to compare the effect of luseogliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i), on sarcopenic obesity in comparison to that of a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD). Twenty-week-old male db/db mice were fed a normal diet (Ctrl), LCD, and normal diet with 0.01% w/w luseogliflozin (SGLT2i) for eight weeks. Skeletal muscle mass and grip strength decreased in the LCD group mice compared to those in the control group, while they increased in the SGLT2i group mice. The amino acid content in the liver, skeletal muscle, and serum were lower in the LCD group than those in the Ctrl group but increased in the SGLT2i group mice. Short-chain fatty acids in rectal feces were lower in the LCD group mice than those in the Ctrl group, whereas they were higher in the SGLT2i group mice. The abundance of Gammaproteobacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia, Enterobacterales, and Bacteroides caccae species increased in the LCD group compared to the other two groups, whereas the abundance of Syntrophothermus lipocalidus, Syntrophomonadaceae family, Parabacteroidesdistasonis distasonis, and the genus Anaerotignum increased in the SGLT2i group. Luseogliflozin could prevent sarcopenic obesity by improving amino acid metabolism.

Luseogliflozin inhibits high glucose-induced TGF-ß2 expression in mouse cardiomyocytes by suppressing NHE-1 activity.

OBJECTIVE: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors exhibit cardioprotective properties in patients with diabetes. However, SGLT2 is not expressed in the heart, and the underlying molecular mechanisms are not fully understood. We investigated whether the SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin exerts beneficial effects on high glucose-exposed cardiomyocytes via the suppression of sodium-hydrogen exchanger-1 (NHE-1) activity. METHODS: Mouse cardiomyocytes were incubated under normal or high glucose conditions with vehicle, luseogliflozin, or the NHE-1 inhibitor cariporide. NHE-1 activity and gene expression were evaluated by the SNARF assay and real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis, respectively. Six-week-old male db/db mice were treated with vehicle or luseogliflozin for 6 weeks, and the hearts were collected for histological, RT-PCR, and western blot analyses. RESULTS: High glucose increased NHE-1 activity and transforming growth factor (Tgf)-ß2 mRNA levels in cardiomyocytes, both of which were inhibited by luseogliflozin or cariporide, whereas their combination showed no additive suppression of Tgf-ß2 mRNA levels. Luseogliflozin attenuated cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in db/db mice in association with decreased mRNA and protein levels of TGF-ß2. CONCLUSIONS: Luseogliflozin may suppress cardiac hypertrophy in diabetes by reducing Tgf-ß2 expression in cardiomyocytes via the suppression of NHE-1 activity.

Additional Effect of Luseogliflozin on Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Complicated by Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Open-Label, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study.

INTRODUCTION: Untreated nonalcoholic fatty liver may progress to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and cirrhosis and induce hepatocellular carcinoma and liver failure. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), often complicated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is a driver of NAFLD progression. Thus, efficacious treatment strategies for patients with coexisting NAFLD and T2DM are important for preventing NAFLD progression. Although previous studies have demonstrated that either sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) benefit NASH patients with T2DM, the rate of NASH resolution has not sufficiently improved. Therefore, we developed a protocol for a randomized controlled trial to examine whether the addition of an SGLT2i to the treatment regimen of patients receving a GLP-1 RA (combination therapy), within the therapeutic dose range for T2DM, increases the rate of NASH resolution in patients with coexisting NASH and T2DM. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, parallel-group study commenced in June 2021, will conclude recruitment in May 2023, and will end by March 2025. Sixty patients with NASH complicated by T2DM are enrolled at the Ehime University Hospital in Toon, Japan. Participants will be randomized into: (1) an intervention group receiving combination therapy with the SGLT2i luseogliflozin 2.5 mg, once daily (Taisho Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) and the GLP-1 RA semaglutide 0.5 mg, once per week (Novonordisk, Copenhagen, Denmark); and (2) a control group receiving monotherapy with the GLP-1 analog semaglutide. The primary endpoints, which will be ascertained by liver biopsy, are: (1) NASH resolution rate from baseline without worsening of liver fibrosis after 52 weeks of intervention; (2) rate of improvement from baseline of at least 1 point in the NAFLD activity score without worsening of liver fibrosis after 52 weeks of intervention; and (3) rate of improvement from baseline of at least one fibrosis stage without worsening of NASH after 52 weeks of intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN-CTR) number: UMIN000045003. Japan Registry of Clinical Trials registration number: jRCTs061210009.

Effects of luseogliflozin on estimated plasma volume in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

AIMS: Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors have diuretic effects in both patients with glycosuria and with natriuresis. We sought to assess the effect of luseogliflozin on estimated plasma volume (ePV) in patients with type 2 diabetes and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: This study was a post-hoc analysis of the MUSCAT-HF trial (UMIN000018395), a multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial that assessed the effect of 12 weeks of luseogliflozin (2.5 mg, once daily, n = 83) as compared with voglibose (0.2 mg, three times daily, n = 82) on the reduction in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients with type 2 diabetes and HFpEF. The analysis compared the change in ePV calculated by the Straus formula from baseline to Weeks 4, 12, and 24, using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. We also estimated the association between changes in ePV and changes in other clinical parameters, including BNP levels. Luseogliflozin significantly reduced ePV as compared to voglibose at Week 4 {adjusted mean group-difference -6.43% [95% confidence interval (CI): -9.11 to -3.74]}, at Week 12 [-8.73% (95%CI: -11.40 to -6.05)], and at Week 24 [-11.02% (95%CI: -13.71 to -8.33)]. The effect of luseogliflozin on these parameters was mostly consistent across various patient clinical characteristics. The change in ePV at Week 12 was significantly associated with log-transformed BNP (r = 0.197, P = 0.015) and left atrial volume index (r = 0.283, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Luseogliflozin significantly reduced ePV in patients with type 2 diabetes and HFpEF, as compared with voglibose. The reduction of intravascular volume by luseogliflozin may provide clinical benefits to patients with type 2 diabetes and HFpEF.

Factors Influencing Change in Serum Uric Acid After Administration of the Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Luseogliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Although sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors lower serum uric acid, their long-term effect on uric acid metabolism is not well understood. We analyzed pooled data from studies wherein patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus received luseogliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor. Upon stratifying patients by baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c ) or serum uric acid, lower HbA1c or higher serum uric acid level was associated with a greater reduction in serum uric acid after treatment. At week 12 of treatment, significant increases in urinary glucose/creatinine (Cr) ratio and urinary uric acid clearance/Cr clearance ratio (CUA /CCr ratio) and a significant reduction in serum uric acid were observed. Comparison of the subgroups of patients with a reduction or an increase in serum uric acid showed that the increase subgroup had a higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline, and the eGFR was significantly reduced, associated with a significant reduction in the CUA /CCr ratio. Multiple regression analysis showed that the reduction in serum uric acid in the luseogliflozin group was strongly associated with baseline high serum uric acid, low HbA1c levels, and an increase in eGFR. Luseogliflozin was shown to reduce serum uric acid by enhancing urinary uric acid excretion in association with increased urinary glucose. Treatment with luseogliflozin resulted in increased serum uric acid in some patients, which may be due to reduced glomerular filtration of uric acid via the tubuloglomerular feedback. SGLT2 inhibitors reduced serum uric acid desirably in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with low HbA1c and high serum uric acid.

Do SGLT2 Inhibitors Improve Cardio-Renal Outcomes in Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with dreadful changes in the cardiovascular and renal systems, causing increased morbidity and mortality. Sodium-glucose cotransport-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors belong to the oral hypoglycemic group of drugs believed to reduce these events by various mechanisms in DM. We performed a systematic review to determine the effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors in reducing cardiovascular and renal complications and address safety concerns in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We explored PubMed, PubMed Central, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cochrane library, and ResearchGate for randomized controlled trials and observational studies done on the advantages of SGLT2 inhibitors in the prevention or reduction of worsening cardiovascular and renal changes in T2DM. Studies were screened for the quality assessment using the Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We screened 5615 articles, out of which 22 articles with 7,02,977 diabetes mellitus patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors were used for the systematic review after meticulously filtering articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The trials included one of the following drugs - empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, and luseogliflozin. SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of heart failure (HF), frequency of hospitalizations due to HF, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Renal outcomes showed a significant lowering of risk of acute kidney failure, progression of chronic kidney disease, renal mortality, and improvement in urinary albumin creatinine ratio. We noticed an initial worsening of the estimated glomerular filtration rate followed by stabilizing and reaching the baseline on long-term treatment, especially in end-stage renal failure patients. The review showed that SGLT2 inhibitors have adverse reactions similar to that of a placebo, with a slight increase in treatable genital mycotic and urinary tract infections but no evidence of diabetic ketoacidosis, fractures, and amputations. According to the available data, SGLT2 inhibitors can significantly prevent or reduce cardiovascular diseases and kidney abnormalities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with tolerable safety outcomes.

Changes in urinary glucose concentration and body weight in patients treated with the selective SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin.

AIMS: We investigated the effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin on blood and urinary glucose and body weight. METHODS: Luseogliflozin 2.5 mg was administered once daily for 24 weeks to 30 outpatients with type 2 diabetes. Urinary glucose concentration, continuous glucose monitoring values, HbA1c, fasting glucose, and body weight were evaluated. Correlations with urinary glucose, subcutaneous/visceral fat mass, insulin, EPA/AA ratio, plasma free fatty acids, ghrelin, blood ketones, plasma 1,5-anhydro-D-glucitol were evaluated. RESULTS: Urinary glucose significantly increased from 11.1 ± 11.8 g at Week -4 to 84.5 ± 46.8 g at Week 24. HbA1c significantly declined from 7.88 ± 0.88% to 7.36 ± 1.13% at Week 24. Mean blood glucose significantly decreased from 149.6 ± 41.8 to 131.6 ± 31.1 mg/dL at Week 24. Subcutaneous and visceral fat mass was also significantly decreased, as were AST and ALT (P < 0.01). Blood urea nitrogen was significantly increased, and urate significantly decreased from 5.04 ± 1.07 to 4.53 ± 0.94 mg/dL. The homeostasis model assessment ratio remained significantly improved throughout the treatment period. Acyl ghrelin levels remained constant but des-acyl ghrelin increased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Luseogliflozin monotherapy resulted in an improvement in blood glucose, a decrease in body weight, and decreased insulin resistance. Luseogliflozin appears to be an effective therapy for obese diabetics.

Efficacy and Safety of Luseogliflozin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Complicated by Hepatic Dysfunction: A Single-Site, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Exploratory Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Improvements in glycemic control and hepatic function are clinically important goals in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) complicated by hepatic dysfunction. The favorable effects of the sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitor luseogliflozin on hepatic dysfunction were anticipated for humans. Nevertheless, few clinical studies have confirmed its real-world efficacy on hepatic dysfunction. This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of luseogliflozin in patients with T2DM complicated by hepatic dysfunction. METHODS: This prospective, single-site, single-arm, open-label, exploratory trial included 55 subjects with T2DM complicated by hepatic dysfunction. Subjects were administered luseogliflozin and observed for 52 weeks. The primary endpoints were the change in aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to week 52. The secondary endpoints included body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), homeostatic model assessment beta (HOMA-ß), homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), ferritin, Mac-2 binding protein (M2-BP), fatty liver index (FLI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, type IV collagen 7S domain, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). RESULTS: AST, ALT, γ-GTP, and HbA1c significantly decreased from baseline to week 52. Body weight, BMI, waist circumference, and FPG also significantly decreased. HOMA-IR significantly decreased but HOMA-ß was unchanged. FLI, ferritin, M2-BP, and NAFLD fibrosis scores significantly decreased whereas the FIB-4 index and type IV collagen 7S domain did not significantly change. The hs-CRP and IL-6 levels did not significantly change. CONCLUSION: Luseogliflozin administration in patients with T2DM complicated by hepatic dysfunction was well tolerated, did not worsen the hepatic condition, and might even be beneficial to improve hepatic function, reduce liver fat, and attenuate liver injury and fibrosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered under the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN-CTR) (No. UMIN000025808) and the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) (No. jRCTs021180017).

Glucose Lowering Efficacy and Pleiotropic Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors.

In type 2 diabetes, the maladaptive upregulation of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) protein expression and activity contribute to the maintenance of hyperglycemia. By inhibiting these proteins, SGLT2 inhibitors increase urinary glucose excretion (UGE) that leads to fall in plasma glucose concentrations and improvement in all glycemic parameters. Clinical studies have demonstrated that in patients with type 2 diabetes, SGLT2 inhibitors resulted in sustained reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), body weight, blood pressure and serum uric acid levels. Interestingly, the cardiovascular (CV) and renal outcome trials revealed the beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on CV and renal functions. Because the benefits were seen soon after initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors, these observations are explained by effects beyond their glucose lowering capacity. SGLT2 inhibitors also reduce liver fat in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type 2 diabetes. This chapter describes the basic information about SGLT2 inhibitors, current status of SGLT2 inhibitors in the management of type 2 diabetes and their beneficial effects in addition to glycemic control.

Effects of luseogliflozin on arterial properties in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: The multicenter, exploratory LUSCAR study.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular and renal complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and represent guideline-recommended therapy in this indication. However, precise mechanisms underlying the beneficial cardiovascular effects of SGLT2 inhibitors are not fully understood. This study investigated the effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor, luseogliflozin, on arterial properties and home blood pressure (BP) in patients with T2DM. This multicenter, single-arm study enrolled adults with T2DM, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.5%-8.9% in the previous 4 weeks, and an indication for new/additional antidiabetic therapy. Luseogliflozin 2.5 mg/d was given for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was change in cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) from baseline to Week 4 and Week 12. Home and office BP, BP variability, and metabolic parameters were secondary endpoints. Forty-seven patients (mean age 63.5 ± 10.7 years) treated with luseogliflozin were included in the full analysis set. CAVI did not change significantly from baseline (mean [95% confidence interval] 8.67 [8.37-8.97]) to Week 12 (8.64 [8.38-8.91]; P = .750), but there were significant reductions from baseline in morning home BP, HbA1c, body weight, body mass index, and serum uric acid levels during luseogliflozin therapy. The reduction in morning home systolic BP was ≥ 5 mm Hg and was independent of baseline BP and BP control status. In conclusion, there was no change in arterial stiffness (based on CAVI) during treatment with luseogliflozin, but changes in BP and metabolic parameters were consistent with the known beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in T2DM.

The effect of luseogliflozin on bone microarchitecture in older patients with type 2 diabetes: study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial using second-generation, high-resolution, peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT).

BACKGROUND: Older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of bone fracture independent of their bone mineral density (BMD), which is explained mainly by the deteriorated bone quality in T2DM compared to that in non-diabetic adults. Sodium-glucose co-transporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors have been studied in several trials in T2DM, and the Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study showed an increased fracture risk related to treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor canagliflozin, although no evidence of increased fracture risk with treatment with other SGLT2 inhibitors has been reported. The mechanism of the difference in the fracture risk between the SGLT2 inhibitors is unknown, but the differences among the SGLT2 inhibitors in the selectivity of SGLT2 against SGLT1 may affect bone metabolism, since among the SGLT2 inhibitors the selectivity of canagliflozin is lowest. We will investigate whether the SGLT2 inhibitor luseogliflozin, which has the higher SGLT2 selectivity, affects bone metabolism by using high-resolution, peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) which provides direct in vivo morphometric information about the bone microarchitecture. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a single-center, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel pilot trial. Eligible participants are older (age ≥ 60 years) individuals with T2DM with HbA1c levels at 7.0-8.9%. A total of 24 participants will be allocated to either the luseogliflozin group (taking luseogliflozin) or the control group (taking metformin) in a 1:1 ratio to compare the groups' changes in bone microarchitecture of the radius and tibia which are analyzed by HR-pQCT before and at 48 weeks after the administration of each medication. The laboratory data associated with glycemic control and bone metabolism will be collected every 12 weeks during the study. Recruitment began in June 2019. DISCUSSION: The reason that we use metformin as an active control is to avoid yielding differences in glycemic control between the luseogliflozin and control groups. Besides, metformin is considered to have a neutral effect on bone. This trial should reveal the effect of luseogliflozin on bone metabolism in older patients with T2DM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000036202) on 1 April 2019 and with the Japan Registry of Clinicla Trials (jRCTs071180061) on 14 March 2019.