RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The routine drain placement following renal transplantation is currently under debate. Its benefit is uncertain and may cause complications, particularly infectious ones. Some renal transplant patients have low-productive drains, that might be unnecessary. The objective of this study is to bring to light factors influencing drain volume in kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All kidney transplant patients in Tours between 2019 and 2020 were included. The characteristics of the two groups were analyzed: patients with low-productive redons (quantification less than 100 mL/24h,) and patients with productive redons (≥100 mL/24h). Univariate and multivariate analyses by logistic regression were performed to look for risk factors associated with productive drainage. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-nine patients were included (67 in the low-productive group and 122 in the productive group). The results in the productive group showed a significantly higher proportion of retransplantation (p=0.015), overweight (p=0.012), low residual diuresis (p=0.041), and a significantly lower proportion of preemptive transplantation (p=0.008) and peritoneal dialysis (p=0,037). After an adjustment, the following variables remained significantly associated with greater drainage: overweight (OR= 2.42. p = 0.014 ; CI95% [1.2-4.94]) ; retransplantation (OR = 3.98. p = 0.027 ; IC95% [1.27-15.45]), and preemptive transplant (OR= 0.22. p = 0.013 ; CI95% [0.06-0.7]). CONCLUSION: The non-implementation of a redon in renal transplantation could be considered, in a selected population of non-overweight patients, with significant residual diuresis for a first transplantation which should be preemptive. This could lead to a randomized controlled trial to determine the real benefits of a routine drain replacement in kidney transplantation.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are multiple methods for preventing lymphocele formation after kidney transplantation (KTx). However, lymphoceles still develop in up to one third of patients and the effectiveness of these different methods in preventing lymphocele is not well described. Here, we summarize the current strategies for preventing lymphocele after KTx. METHODS: We conducted searches across several literature databases, including Medline (via PubMed), Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central. Lymphocele formation after KTx was the outcome of interest. A random-effects model was applied to evaluate pooled estimates, which were presented as hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs), along with the random pooled estimate (ES), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and P value. We calculated the pooled rate of lymphocele formation after KTx with the following preventive methods: LigaSure, haemostatic materials, prophylactic drainage, ligation, peritoneal fenestration, and bipolar cautery techniques. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 87 unique studies after excluding duplicates. Twenty papers reporting on 5445 patients were incorporated in the qualitative analysis. The pooled lymphocele rate was 3.0% (95% CI = 0.6-13.7) for the LigaSure method, 8.3% (95% CI = 6.4-10.7) for drainage, 9.2% (95% CI = 5.9-14.1) for haemostatic materials, 12.2% (95% CI = 9.2-16.1) for ligation, 14.4% (95% CI = 12.0-17.3) for peritoneal fenestration, and 20.5% (95% CI = 10.2-36.8) for bipolar sealing. CONCLUSION: Despite preventive methods, the incidence of lymphocele following KTx remains high. The use of LigaSure appears to be the most effective method for preventing lymphocele. However, given the broad range of reported lymphocele rates and lack of control groups, further validation of these findings is necessary.
RESUMO
Background: In Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), lymphocele formation is a troublesome complication. The use of peritoneal flaps has emerged as a promising novel technique to tackle this complication. We explored this technique by suturing both the medial peritoneal flaps to each other and keeping them distracted so that the lymphadenectomy beds are left wide open. Objective: To assess the efficacy of our peritoneal distraction technique on lymphocele rates following Retzius-sparing RARP. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with localized prostate carcinoma who underwent Retzius-sparing RARP with standard pelvic lymph node dissection between May 2014 and September 2022 at Aster Medcity, Kochi, India. Based on the use of the technique, patients were divided into two groups: peritoneal distraction and closed groups. Both groups were matched using the propensity scoring method in a 1:1 ratio. Results: A total of 272 patients were included, of which 89 (32.7%) belonged to the peritoneal distraction group. Although the overall incidence of lymphocele between the two groups were comparable, none of the patients in the peritoneal distraction group required any intervention for lymphocele management, as opposed to 7 patients from the closed group (3.9%; P = 0.015). No significant association was found between lymphocele formation and serum prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, and the number of lymph nodes harvested. Conclusions: This study found that peritoneal distraction stitch is a simple and effective technique to reduce the incidence of symptomatic lymphocele that require intervention after Retzius-sparing RARP.
RESUMO
Early postoperative wound complications in revascularization procedures in the groin very often include complications associated with injury to the lymphatic system such as lymphocele and lymphorrhea with subsequent local infectious complications and the risk of infection of prosthetic grafts. We present a case report of successful treatment of postoperative lymphocele with subsequent lymphatic fistula and dehiscence of the surgical wound by intranodal embolization of the injured lymph node with Histoacryl tissue glue.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Virilha , Linfocele , Humanos , Linfocele/etiologia , Linfocele/terapia , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Masculino , Embucrilato/uso terapêutico , Linfonodos/transplante , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Adesivos Teciduais/uso terapêutico , IdosoRESUMO
Persistent lymphocele of the groin is a complication of groin surgery that can severely impact the quality of life. The restoration of the interrupted lymphatic pathway is considered by many authors the ideal treatment to prevent a recurrence. However, multiple aspiration procedures and surgical revisions can compromise the availability of local veins needed for a lymphovenular bypass surgery. In addition, surgical debridement of a long-standing lymphocele can generate extensive dead space and contour deformity. A flap delivering additional venules for trans-flap lymphovenular anastomoses (LVAs) can overcome both problems by providing soft tissue and competent veins harvested outside the zone of injury. A successful case of severe groin lymphocele treated with trans-flap LVAs from an abdominal-based flap is presented. The patient was referred to us for a recurrent lymphocele developed in the right groin after lipoma excision that persisted despite multiple surgical attempts. After the identification of patent and draining inguinal lymphatic vessels, a pinch test was used to design a mini-abdominoplasty superficial inferior epigastric artery flap. The superficial veins of the cranial incision were identified and anastomosed to the lymphatic vessels after the pedicled flap harvested and insetted in the groin. The early restoration of lymphatic drainage and the optimal aesthetic outcome supports the combined approach offered by trans-flap LVAs as a valuable therapeutic option for severe and persistent lymphocele.
RESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of using vascular clips to seal targeted lymphatics in gynecological malignancies for the prevention of postoperative pelvic lymphocele and symptomatic lymphocele after laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Single-center academic hospital. PATIENTS: In total, 217 patients with gynecological malignancies were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were classified into two groups: group 1 (vascular clips were used to seal the targeted lymphatics) and group 2 (electrothermal instruments were used to seal the targeted lymphatics). The patients were followed up 4-6 weeks after surgery to evaluate the incidence of lymphoceles by ultrasound or CT. Symptomatic lymphoceles are defined as those that cause infection, deep vein thrombosis with or without swelling of the extremities, edema (swelling) of the extremities or perineum, hydronephrosis and/or moderate to severe pain. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen patients were enrolled in group 1, and 104 patients were enrolled in group 2. Lymphoceles were observed in 46 (21.2%) patients. Fewer lymphoceles occurred in group 1 than in group 2 [8 (7.1%) vs. 38 (36.5%), p < 0.001]. The percentage of significantly sized lymphoceles was lower in group 1 than that in group 2 [4 (3.5%) vs. 30 (28.8%), p < 0.001]. Symptomatic lymphoceles occurred in 18 patients (8.3%), and only one (1.0%) occurred in group 1, while 17 (16.3%) occurred in group 2 (p < 0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that vascular clips were the only independent factor for preventing lymphocele (ORâ¯=â¯7.65, 95% CIâ¯=â¯[3.30, 17.13], p < 0.001) and symptomatic lymphocele (ORâ¯=â¯22.03, 95% CIâ¯=â¯[2.84, 170.63], pâ¯=â¯0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the use of vascular clips may be useful for the prevention of the development of lymphocele and symptomatic lymphocele secondary to pelvic lymphadenectomy performed via laparoscopy.
RESUMO
Background: Lymphadenectomy plays an essential role in the staging protocols for gynecologic cancers, as recommended by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). While its benefits vary, complications may arise during intra-operative, acute post-operative, or long-term periods. Notably, lymphadenectomy-associated systemic morbidity and specific complications such as lymphocele and lymphedema have been reported. Methods: This retrospective study involved 399 patients with cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancers who underwent pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. The follow-up period was at least 3 months. Intra-operative complications encompassed adjacent organ injury and significant blood loss, while acute post-operative complications occurred within 29 days. Post-30-day complications included lymphocele and lymphedema. Logistic regression analysis identified predictors for complications. Results: The overall complication rate was 42.4%, with intra-operative, acute post-operative, and long-term rates of 26.1%, 11.0%, and 14.0%, respectively. Predictors for overall complications included laparotomy, positive lymph nodes, and operative time > 240 min. For intra-operative complications, age > 60 years, laparotomy, positive lymph nodes, and operative time > 240 min were significant predictors. Symptomatic lymphocele and lymphedema occurred in 6.0% and 2.0% of patients, respectively, mainly in the long-term period. Conclusion: Although the overall complication rate after gynecologic surgery was found to be almost half of all cases, the rate of severe complications was low. Additionally, the rates of symptomatic lymphocele and lymphedema were low. Lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer surgery can be performed safely.
RESUMO
The available randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the influence of peritoneal interposition flaps (PIF) on the reduction of symptomatic lymphoceles (sLCs) post robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) do not constitute a sufficient follow-up (FU) to assess the long-term effects. The PIANOFORTE trial was the first of these RCTs, showing no sLC reduction at the 3-month FU. Therefore, all 232 patients from the PIANOFORTE trial were invited for long-term FU. One hundred seventy-six patients (76%) presented themselves for FU and constituted the study group (SG). The median FU duration was 43 months. No significant differences in group allocation or LC endpoints at 90 days were observed between SG patients and patients not presenting themselves for the FU. During the FU period, four patients (2.3%) in the SG developed sLCs, and six patients (3.4%) developed asymptomatic lymphoceles (aLCs), which persisted in five patients (2.9%). There were no significant differences between PIF and non-PIF regarding sLC/aLC formation or persistence, newly developed complications, stress urinary incontinence or biochemical/clinical tumour recurrence. Therefore, this long-term FU confirms the primary outcomes of the PIANOFORTE trial that, while PIF does not impact complications or functionality, it does not reduce sLC/aLC rates. Furthermore, it shows the potential occurrence of LC after the third postoperative month.
Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Linfocele , Esvaziamento Cervical , Ducto Torácico , Tireoidectomia , Humanos , Esvaziamento Cervical/efeitos adversos , Ducto Torácico/diagnóstico por imagem , Ducto Torácico/cirurgia , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Linfocele/etiologia , Linfocele/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfocele/terapia , Linfocele/cirurgia , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is recommended while performing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for patients with localized intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. However, symptomatic lymphoceles can occur after surgery, adding significant morbidity to patients. Our objective is to describe a novel Peritoneal Bladder Flap Bunching technique (PBFB) to reduce the risk of clinically significant lymphoceles in patients undergoing RARP and PLND. METHODS: We evaluated 2267 patients who underwent RARP with PLND, dividing them into two groups: Group 1, comprising 567 patients who had the peritoneal flap (PBFB), and Group 2, comprising 1700 patients without the flap; propensity score matching carried out at a 1:3 ratio. Variables analyzed included estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, postoperative complications, lymphocele formation, and the development of symptomatic lymphocele. RESULTS: The two groups exhibited similar preoperative characteristics after matching. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of lymphoceles between the flap group and the non-flap group, with rates of 24% and 20.9%, respectively (p = 0.14). However, none of the patients in the flap group (0%) developed symptomatic lymphoceles, whereas 2.2% of patients in the non-flap group experienced symptomatic lymphoceles (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated a modified technique for a peritoneal flap (PBFB) with the initial elimination of postoperative symptomatic lymphoceles and promising short-term outcomes.
RESUMO
Lymphocele is one of the most common complications after radical prostatectomy. Multiple authors have proposed the use of vessel sealants or peritoneal interposition techniques as preventive interventions. This study aimed to aggregate and analyze the available literature on different interventions which seek to prevent lymphocele through a Bayesian Network. A systematic review was performed to identify prospective studies evaluating strategies for lymphocele prevention after robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy + pelvic lymph node dissection. Data was inputted into Review Manager 5.4 for pairwise meta-analysis. Data was then used to build a network in R Studio. These networks were used to model 200,000 Markov Chains via MonteCarlo sampling. The results are expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Meta-regression was used to determine coefficient of change and adjust for pelvic lymph node dissection extent. Ten studies providing data from 2211 patients were included. 1097 patients received an intervention and 1114 patients served as controls. Interposition with fenestration had the lowest risk of developing a lymphocele (OR 0.14 [0.04, 0.50], p = 0.003). All interventions, except sealants or patches, had significant decreased odds of lymphocele rates. Meta-analysis of all the included studies showed a decreased risk of developing a lymphocele (OR 0.42 [0.33, 0.53], p < 0.00001) for the intervention group. Perivesical fixation and interposition with fenestration appear to be effective interventions for reducing the overall incidence of lymphocele.
Assuntos
Linfocele , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Masculino , Teorema de Bayes , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Linfocele/etiologia , Linfocele/prevenção & controle , Metanálise em Rede , Estudos Prospectivos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodosRESUMO
Background: Lymphoceles are amongst the most common complications following kidney transplantation. Therefore, effective strategies to prevent their development are needed. The ligation of lymphatic vessels has proven to be a successful concept for that purpose. However, whether electrocauterization or suture ligation is more effective is unclear. Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis using a random effects model with the log risk ratio as the primary outcome measure. Additionally, an analysis using a random effects model with the raw mean difference in lymphatic sealing time between suture ligation and electrocauterization was performed. Adequate studies were found in a literature search conducted in PubMed, CENTRAL and Web of Science as well as from independent sources. Results: A total of 8 studies including 601 patients were included in the analysis. The estimated average log risk ratio based on the random effects model was µ = -0.374 (95% CI: -0.949 to 0.201), which did not differ significantly from zero (z = -1.28, p = 0.2). The lymphatic sealing time was 7.28 (95% CI:1.25-13.3) minutes shorter in the electrocauterization group. Conclusions: We conclude that neither technique is superior for the purpose of lymphocele prevention post kidney transplantation, and secondary criteria like time savings, cost and surgeons' preference should be considered in the decision for an optimal outcome.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Symptomatic lymphocele remains a relevant complication after pelvic tumor surgery. This study aims to investigate how the number of lymph nodes removed may influence postoperative outcomes and if it increases the probability of detecting lymph node metastasis. METHODS: The study included 500 patients who underwent RARP including lymphadenectomy performed by a single surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 consisted of 308 patients with 20 or fewer lymph nodes removed (mean 15), while group 2 had 192 patients with over 20 nodes removed (mean 27). Perioperative data were analyzed, and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Overall, lymph node metastasis was detected in 17.8% of men. In detail, out of 19.6 lymph nodes removed, an average of 3.14 lymph nodes per patient showed metastasis, with a slightly higher incidence of 19.7% in group 2 compared to 16.5% in group 1, though not statistically significant (p = 0.175). The number of lymph node metastases was significantly higher in group 2 patients (3.47) versus group 1 (2.37) (p = 0.048). All complications except symptomatic lymphoceles (p = 0.004) were not significantly different between groups. Univariate linear regression analysis revealed no correlation between the number of removed lymph nodes and symptomatic lymphocele. However, it did correlate with catheter days and readmissions. CONCLUSION: A correlation may exist between the number of lymph nodes removed during RARP and an increased incidence of complications, particularly symptomatic lymphocele. A more extensive PLND may result in prolonged catheter days and increased readmissions. With the increased extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy, the probability of detecting lymphogenic metastasis rises. The diagnostic value of PLND is well established. Further randomized trials are needed to weigh its necessity and extent.
Assuntos
Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática , Linfocele , Humanos , Masculino , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linfocele/etiologia , Linfocele/epidemiologia , Idoso , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adulto , FemininoRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is part of the primary treatment for early-stage cervical cancer and high-intermediate risk or high-risk endometrial cancer. Pelvic lymphocele is a postoperative complication of PLND, and when symptomatic, lymphoceles necessitate treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of symptomatic lymphocele after robot-assisted laparoscopic PLND in cervical and endometrial cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center academic hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred and fifty-eight patients with cervical cancer and 129 patients with endometrial cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Pelvic lymphadenectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors retrospectively included all patients with early-stage cervical cancer and high-intermediate risk or high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery between 2008 and 2022. Medical records were reviewed for the occurrence of a symptomatic lymphocele. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for developing a symptomatic lymphocele. In total, 387 patients, 258 with cervical cancer and 129 with endometrial cancer, were included in the study. The overall incidence of symptomatic lymphoceles was 9.6% with a median follow-up of 47 months [interquartile range 23-61]. For the entire cohort, smoking was the only significant risk factor for symptomatic lymphoceles identified in univariate (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.19-5.11) and multivariate analysis (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.16-5.07). For cervical cancer, body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.17) and prior abdominal surgery (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.22-6.17) were also identified as significant independent risk factors. For endometrial cancer, age was identified as a significant independent risk factor (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.97). CONCLUSION: This single-center cohort study demonstrated an incidence of almost 10% of symptomatic lymphoceles after robot-assisted laparoscopic PLND for cervical cancer and endometrial cancer, with a higher risk observed among patients who smoke at the time of diagnosis. Furthermore, risk factors differ between the 2 populations, necessitating further studies to establish risk models.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Linfocele , Robótica , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Linfocele/epidemiologia , Linfocele/etiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/complicações , Estudos de Coortes , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/complicações , Pelve/cirurgiaRESUMO
Chylous ascites (CA) is a rare complication following renal surgery. Here we present the case of a 28-year-old female who developed CA after a robotic left partial nephrectomy. After failing conservative management, she underwent successful robotic-assisted diagnostic laparoscopy and ligation of lymphoperitoneal fistulae. The higher incidence of CA after left versus right-sided renal surgery may be explained by the para-aortic drainage of the intestinal lymphatic channels. Surgical intervention should be considered when conservative management fails.
RESUMO
Dorsal seroma is a common complication of autologous latissimus dorsi flap (ALDF) in breast reconstruction, and has limited the use of this technique, despite its aesthetic success. It is important to find a right technique to limit the incidence of seroma formation after ALDF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerance of a dorsal quilting technique called "running quilting" using barbed resorbable suture in seroma prevention. Three hundred patients who underwent ALDF breast reconstruction in the period between 2004 and 2014 were included in this study. The population was divided in 3 groups; without quilting, with simple quilting suture, and with running quilting using barbed suture. The incidence of small seromas (requiring 1 or 2 aspirations during routine postoperative visits without adding additional appointments to the follow-up routine) was not significantly decreased: it was 54% in the non-quilted group, 47% in group 2 Quilting, and 34% in group 3 running quilting. However, quilting reduced the duration of drainage, and the rate of late seromas (from 8% to 0%), and chronic sero-hematomas completely disappeared in our experience. Running quilting using barbed suture is highly effective in preventing late and refractory donor-site seromas. Its effectiveness is expected to increase the use of ALDF in breast reconstruction, which we consider currently as one of the best autologous reconstruction techniques.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mamoplastia , Músculos Superficiais do Dorso , Humanos , Feminino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Seroma/etiologia , Seroma/prevenção & controle , Técnicas de Sutura/efeitos adversos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Suturas/efeitos adversos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic lymphoceles (SLCs) after transperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) are common. Evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the impact of peritoneal flaps (PFs) on lymphocele (LC) reduction is inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: To show that addition of PFs leads to a reduction of postoperative SLCs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An investigator-initiated, prospective, parallel, double-blinded, adaptive, phase 3 RCT was conducted. Recruitment took place from September 2019 until December 2021; 6-month written survey-based follow-up was recorded. Stratification was carried out according to potential LC risk factors (extended PLND, diabetes mellitus, and anticoagulation) and surgeons; 1:1 block randomisation was used. Surgeons were informed about allocation after completion of the last surgical step. INTERVENTION: To create PFs, the ventral peritoneum was incised bilaterally and fixated to the pelvic floor. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was SLCs. Secondary endpoints included asymptomatic lymphoceles (ALCs), perioperative parameters, and postoperative complications. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 860 men were screened and 551 randomised. Significant reductions of SLCs (from 9.1% to 3.7%, p = 0.005) and ALCs (27.2% to 10.3%, p < 0.001) over the follow-up period of 6 mo were observed in the intention-to-treat analysis. Operating time was 11 min longer (p < 0.001) in the intervention group; no significant differences in amount (80 vs 103, p = 0.879) and severity (p = 0.182) of postoperative complications (excluding LCs) were observed. The survey-based follow-up might be a limitation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest RCT evaluating PF creation for LC prevention and met its primary endpoint, the reduction of SLCs. The results were consistent among all subgroup analyses including ALCs. Owing to the subsequent reduction of burden for patients and the healthcare system, establishing PFs should become the new standard of care. PATIENT SUMMARY: A new technique-creation of bilateral peritoneal flaps-was added to the standard procedure of robotic-assisted prostatectomy for lymph node removal. It was safe and decreased lymphocele development, a common postoperative complication and morbidity. Hence, it should become a standard procedure.
Assuntos
Linfocele , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Masculino , Humanos , Linfocele/etiologia , Linfocele/prevenção & controle , Peritônio/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
Lymphatic leak after lymph node dissection is a rare but well-known surgical complication that is often treated with conservative management and ultimately reoperation. The purpose of this report is to offer an alternative treatment for chyle leak that avoids hospitalization and subsequent surgery. Sclerotherapy has been used to treat lymphatic leaks in the past and has been shown to be safe and effective. This report presents a patient with a known cervical lymphocele who was followed through multiple sclerotherapy appointments until resolution of the lymphocele.
Assuntos
Linfocele , Escleroterapia , Humanos , Escleroterapia/efeitos adversos , Esvaziamento Cervical/efeitos adversos , Bleomicina , Linfocele/etiologia , Linfocele/terapia , Pescoço , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Lymphocele formation following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is not common, but it can pose diagnostic and treatment challenges. The purpose of this case is to report for the first time the treatment of a postoperative lymphocele following a multi-level ALIF using a peritoneal window made through a minimally invasive laparoscopic approach. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: A 74-year-old male with a history of prostatectomy and pelvic radiation underwent a staged L3-S1 ALIF (left paramedian approach) and T10-pelvis posterior instrumented with L1-5 decompression/posterior column osteotomies for degenerative scoliosis and neurogenic claudication. Three weeks after surgery, swelling of the left abdomen and entire left leg was reported. Computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis demonstrated a large (19.2 × 12.0 × 15.4 cm) retroperitoneal fluid collection with compression of the left ureter and left common iliac vein. Fluid analysis (80% lymphocytes) was consistent with a lymphocele. Percutaneous drainage for 4 days was ineffective at clearing the lymphocele. For more definitive management, the patient underwent an uncomplicated laparoscopic creation of a peritoneal window to allow passive drainage of lymphatic fluid into the abdomen. Three years after surgery, he had no back or leg pain, had achieved spinal union, and had no abdominal swelling or left leg swelling. Advanced imaging also confirmed resolution of the lymphocele. CONCLUSIONS: In this case report, creation of a peritoneal window minimally invasively via a laparoscope allowing passive drainage of lymphatic fluid into the abdomen was safe and effective for management of an abdominal lymphocele following a multi-level ALIF.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Vértebras Lombares , Linfocele , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Masculino , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfocele/cirurgia , Linfocele/etiologia , Linfocele/diagnóstico por imagem , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgiaRESUMO
Background: Pelvic lymphocele (lymphocyst) infection after lymphadenectomy is a rare complication that can cause the spread of inflammation to neighboring organs whose microbiology is not well known. Cutibacterium avidum causes various infections. However, no case reports of C. avidum pelvic lymphocele infection are available; therefore, its clinical characteristics in pelvic lymphocele infections remain unknown. Case presentation: A 38-year-old woman with obesity (body mass index: 38.1 kg/m2) and a history of pelvic lymphadenectomy and chemotherapy for endometrial cancer presented with worsening left lower quadrant (LLQ) pain with fever. Physical examination revealed decreased abdominal bowel sounds and tenderness on LLQ palpation with no signs of peritonitis. Computed tomography (CT) revealed an infected left pelvic lymphocele with inflammation spreading to the adjacent sigmoid colon. Following blood culture, ampicillin/sulbactam (2 g/1 g every 6 h) was administered intravenously. Anaerobic culture bottles revealed gram-positive rods on day 4 of incubation at 37 °C. No other disseminated foci were observed in enhanced whole-body CT and upon transthoracic echocardiography. The isolates grew aerobically and anaerobically on blood agar plates with strong hemolysis. The bacterium was identified as C. avidum using a combination of characteristic peak analysis with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The patient was diagnosed with C. avidum pelvic lymphocele infection. Based on penicillin susceptibility, the patient was successfully treated with intravenous ampicillin/sulbactam and de-escalated with intravenous ampicillin (2 g every 6 h) for 10 days, followed by oral amoxicillin (2000 mg/day) for an additional 11 days without drainage. Conclusions: C. avidum should be considered a causative microorganism of pelvic lymphocele infection. Peak analysis using MALDI and distinctive growth on blood agar plates are suitable for identifying C. avidum. Mild pelvic lymphocele caused by C. avidum can be treated with a short course of appropriate antimicrobial treatment without surgical intervention.