Clinical and ultrasonographic enthesitis assessment before and after anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment in patients with spondyloarthritis.

Objectives: This study aimed to clinically and ultrasonographically evaluate enthesitis in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and to determine enthesitis response to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) treatment. Patients and methods: Thirty-one SpA patients (22 males, 9 females; mean age: 39.4±10.9 years; range, 22 to 60 years) who started anti-TNF treatment due to their high disease activity were included in the cross-sectional prospective study between May 2017 and January 2018. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index were recorded. Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) and Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score were utilized for clinical enthesitis evaluation. Patients were ultrasonographically evaluated in accordance with the Madrid Sonographic Enthesitis Index (MASEI) by a blinded sonographer. Patients were clinically and ultrasonographically assessed at baseline and in the third month after the treatment. Results: In the initial evaluation, 24 (77.42%) of the patients had clinical enthesitis, and 30 (96.77%) of the patients had ultrasonographic enthesitis. After anti-TNF treatment, MASES, SPARCC, MASEI-structure, MASEI-thickness, MASEI-bursitis, MASEI-Doppler, MASEI-inflammatory, and MASEI-total scores significantly decreased (p<0.05). There was no significant change in MASEI-damage, MASEI-erosion, and MASEI-calcification scores following the therapy (p>0.05). Conclusion: Anti-TNF treatment may improve clinical and ultrasonographic enthesitis, particularly inflammatory changes. Erosions and calcifications may not ameliorate after three months of anti-TNF treatment.

The identification of association between ultrasonographic enthesitis and the ASAS Health Index in patients with axial spondyloarthritis.

This study aimed to evaluate association between the entheseal abnormalities in ultrasound and the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index (ASAS HI) in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Seventy-four patients with axSpA were enrolled in this study. Ultrasonographic evaluation of entheses was performed by a blinded rheumatologist with the Madrid Sonographic Enthesitis Index (MASEI). The MASEI total score and the MASEI sub-scores (e.g., structural damage and activity scores) were calculated. The ASAS HI and the other SpA tools (e.g., Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Index, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score) were used to evaluate patients' health and disease activity. Correlation and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between the MASEI and the ASAS HI. The mean score of the ASAS HI was 7.7 ± 4.6. The MASEI total score was calculated as 8.4 ± 6.8, while the mean MASEI-activity was 4.7 ± 3.6 and the mean MASEI-structural damage was 3.8 ± 4.5. There was no correlation between ASAS HI and MASEI total scores (r = 0.11, p = 0.34). However, the ASAS HI had a positive correlation with the MASEI-activity (r = 0.49, p < 0.001) and had a low negative correlation with the MASEI-structural damage (r = - 0.29, p < 0.05). In the linear regression model, the MASEI-activity and MASEI-structural damage were significantly related to the ASAS HI (ß = 0.72 and - 0.58, respectively; R2 = 0.53 p < 0.001). This study reported that the ASAS HI score was more negatively affected by active entheseal lesions rather than structural lesions. We suggest adding the entheses evaluation with ultrasonography to other tools for monitoring the health status of patients with axSpA.

Entheseal Involvement in Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and Gout: An Ultrasound Comparative Study.

Objective: To compare the assessment of entheses in subjects with spondyloarthritis (SpA) with patients with gout by the Madrid Sonographic Enthesis Index (MASEI). Method: This cross-sectional study includes videos of entheses evaluated by ultrasound (US) of 30 patients with SpA diagnosed according to the ASAS criteria and 30 patients with gout established by the presence of monosodium urate crystals. Entheses were evaluated for MASEI in 2 Institutes located in two different countries. Demographic and clinical data were registered. Total MASEI score, MASEI-inflammatory, and MASEI-chronic damage were analyzed. Comparisons between groups were obtained by chi-square test and Student's t-test. An inter-reading US reliability was realized. Results: Patients with gout were older and had significantly more comorbidities than those with SpA. The total MASEI score was not significantly different among diseases (p = 0.07). MASEI-inflammatory was significantly more prevalent at the Achilles tendon in SpA, while the proximal patellar tendon was in gout. Power Doppler was higher in SpA compared to gout (p = 0.005). MASEI-chronic damage related to calcification/enthesophytes predominated in gout (p = 0.043), while calcaneal erosions did in SpA (p = 0.008). The inter-reader concordance was excellent (0.93, CI 95% 0.87-0.96, p = 0.001). Conclusions: SpA and gout similarly involve entheses according to MASE, however, some inflammatory and chronic lesions differ significantly depending on the underlying disease and tendon scanned.

Ultrasonographic assessment of entheseal sites of upper and lower extremities in hemodialysis patients using Madrid Sonography Enthesitis Index.

BACKGROUND: There is no much information about the entheseal involvement among hemodialysis (HD) patients. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and distribution of ultrasonographic (US) entheseal alterations in HD patients and to evaluate the association between US abnormalities and both clinical and laboratory data. METHODS: This study was conducted on 41 HD patients and 23 sex- and age- matched controls. All participants were evaluated clinically for any signs of enthesopathy. Six entheses sites were scanned bilaterally using grey scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) US and were scored using Madrid Sonography Enthesitis Index (MASEI) scoring system. RESULTS: In HD patients, at least one clinical sign suggestive of enthesopathy was found in 69 (14%) of 492 entheses. HD patients had statistically significant higher scores of structural tendon abnormalities (p < 0.001), enthesis thickening (p < 0.001), bone erosions (p < 0.001) and calcification (p = 0.037) than the healthy controls. Total MASEI score was higher in HD patients than healthy controls (median;18 vs 8, p < 0.001), also, MASEI-inflammatory (median;11 vs 3, p < 0.001) and damage scores (median;6 vs 0, p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant positive association between total MASEI score and both age (p = 0.032) and duration of HD (p = 0.037). Duration of HD was predictive for both MASEI-damage component (p = 0.004) and total MASEI score (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of subclinical enthesopathy in HD patients. The entheseal US alterations is much higher in HD patients than in healthy subjects. The duration of HD is the significant predictor of enthesopathy in HD patients.

Interobserver reliability of Masei index validation by a multicenter collaborative group of rheumatologists.

MASEI is the main validated ultrasound score for the evaluation of enthesis. The lack of studies facing the agreement to achieve for the interpretation of the MAdrid Sonographic Enthesis Index (MASEI) among researchers from different centers in multicenter studies is of concern. The aim of this multicenter was to evaluate the interobserver reliability of MASEI. An experienced ultrasonographer-rheumatologist performed ultrasound scans of the areas included in MASEI index in three patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis and Psoriatic Arthritis. Videos were captured. The videos were then evaluated by 24 rheumatologists of the ultrasound working group of the Catalan Society of Rheumatology (EcoCAT). A face-to-face training meeting was held. Ten days after the workshop, the study participants evaluated the videos. A reliability assessment was performed. The ICC for the MASEI scores after the workshop was of 0.97 (95% CI 89-99). Reliability did not vary statistically with examiner experience. Globally, no problems of reliability by structures were seen, and all the ICCs were above 0.90 and improved slightly after the educational program. However, the correlation observed between examiners at plantar aponeursis and triceps tendon was weak. The small variability observed in the results of the index validation in our study, suggests that the MASEI index is reproducible by different observers when those are well trained and show awesome results of the enthesis when examined by ultrasound.

Is ultrasonographic enthesitis evaluation helpful for diagnosis of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis?

The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic utility of ultrasonographic enthesitis assessment in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and to compare different sonographic scoring methods. Patients with nr-axSpA (n = 30) and mechanical back pain (MBP) (n = 30) were enrolled in the study with standardized clinical criteria. For both of the groups, a total of 18 entheses were evaluated in each patient with B mode ultrasound and power Doppler by a sonographer who is blinded to initial clinical and radiological assessments. Glasgow Ultrasound Enthesitis Scoring System (GUESS), Madrid Sonographic Enthesitis Index (MASEI) and D'Agostino grading system were performed. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability analyses were evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). There was at least one enthesitis in 96.7% of patients with nr-axSpA. Median values of the number of enthesitis were 5 in nr-axSpA and 0 in MBP. Mean GUESS total scores were 0.9 in MBP and 4.5 in nr-axSpA. Mean MASEI total scores were 2.3 and 10.5, respectively. The sensitivities were 96.7% and 93.3% for GUESS and MASEI while the detected specificities were 80% for both methods. For Intra-rater reliability analysis, ICC was calculated as 0.981 for GUESS and 0.975 for MASEI, while it was calculated as 0.964 and 0.962 for inter-rater reliability analysis. Thus, evaluation of enthesitis with ultrasound is a reliable, helpful tool for the distinction of patients with nr-axSpA from patients with MBP. We favored the use of MASEI because of assessing upper extremity, using power Doppler and having a correlation with disease activity.