Malignant phyllodes tumor with EGFR variant III mutation: A rare case report with immunohistochemical and genomic studies.

A female in her 60's presented with a left-sided breast mass. A core needle biopsy specimen showed diffuse proliferation of a round cell tumor, which was positive for vimentin, NKX2.2, BCOR, and focal CD99 on immunohistochemistry (IHC). No fusion genes of the Ewing family sarcomas were detected. With a tentative diagnosis of primary breast sarcoma (PBS), total mastectomy was performed after chemotherapy. The resected tissues showed proliferation of round or spindle-shaped tumor cells with a high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio, exhibiting solid and fascicular arrangements but no epithelial component or organoid pattern. While IHC indicated no particular histological diagnosis, genomic examination revealed gene alterations in MED12 p.G44D, MLL2 (KMT2D) p.T1496fs*27, and EGFR variant III (vIII). Moreover, a retrospective IHC study showed overexpression of EGFRvIII. A malignant phyllodes tumor (PT) with extensive sarcomatous overgrowth was indicated as an integrative diagnosis. This is a rare case of a malignant PT harboring EGFRvIII. The present case provides an importance of accurate diagnosis and genomic analysis of rare breast tumors, as malignant PT and PBS are different in its treatment strategy and prognosis.

Low MLL2 Protein Expression Is Associated With Fibrosis in Early Stage Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Myeloid/lymphoid or mixed lineage leukemia 2 (MLL2) gene is mutated in gastric cancer, with most resulting in inactivated proteins. In this study, we examined the expression of MLL2 protein in gastric cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The expression of MLL2 protein in cancer cell nuclei was studied by immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays of 529 human gastric cancers. MLL2 expression was classified into low and high expression from the point of zygosity, and its relationships with mismatch repair protein expression and clinicopathological features were examined. RESULTS: Low expression of MLL2 was associated with younger age, MSH6, and early cancers. MLL2-low pT1a cancers were associated with fibrosis, especially ulcer scars, and in 62.5% of them there was no direct contact between carcinoma and fibrosis. CONCLUSION: There is potentially an association between low expression of MLL2 protein and gastric malignancy from chronic fibrosis.

High MLL2 expression predicts poor prognosis and promotes tumor progression by inducing EMT in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: MLL2 has been identified as one of the most frequently mutated genes in a variety of cancers including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, its clinical significance and prognostic value in ESCC has not been elucidated. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the expression and role of MLL2 in ESCC. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and qRT-PCR were used to examine the expression profile of MLL2. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to investigate the clinical and prognostic significance of MLL2 expression in Kazakh ESCC patients. Furthermore, to evaluate the biological function of MLL2 in ESCC, we applied the latest gene editing technique CRISPR/Cas9 to knockout MLL2 in ESCC cell line Eca109. MTT, colony formation, flow cytometry, scratch wound-healing and transwell migration assays were performed to investigate the effect of MLL2 on ESCC cell proliferation and migration. The correlation between MLL2 and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was investigated by Western blot assay in vitro and IHC in ESCC tissue, respectively. RESULTS: Both mRNA and protein expression levels of MLL2 were significantly overexpressed in ESCC patients. High expression of MLL2 was significantly correlated with TNM stage (P = 0.037), tumor differentiation (P = 0.032) and tumor size (P = 0.035). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients with low MLL2 expression had a better overall survival than those with high MLL2 expression. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis and tumor differentiation were independent prognostic factors. Knockout of MLL2 in Eca109 inhibited cell proliferation and migration ability, induced cell cycle arrest at G1 stage, but it had no significant effect on apoptosis. In addition, knockout of MLL2 could inhibit EMT by up-regulation of E-Cadherin and Smad7 as well as down-regulation of Vimentin and p-Smad2/3 in ESCC cells. In cancer tissues, the expression of E-Cadherin was negatively correlated with MLL2 expression while Vimentin expression was positively correlated with MLL2 expression. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that overexpression of MLL2 predicts poor clinical outcomes and facilitates ESCC tumor progression, and it may exert oncogenic role via activation of EMT. MLL2 may be used as a novel prognostic factor and therapeutic target for ESCC patients.

MLL2/KMT2D and MLL3/KMT2C expression correlates with disease progression and response to imatinib mesylate in chronic myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a clonal myeloproliferative neoplasm whose pathogenesis is linked to the Philadelphia chromosome presence that generates the BCR-ABL1 fusion oncogene. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) such as imatinib mesylate (IM) dramatically improved the treatment efficiency and survival of CML patients by targeting BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase. The disease shows three distinct clinical-laboratory stages: chronic phase, accelerated phase and blast crisis. Although patients in the chronic phase respond well to treatment, patients in the accelerated phase or blast crisis usually show therapy resistance and CML relapse. It is crucial, therefore, to identify biomarkers to predict CML genetic evolution and resistance to TKI therapy, considering not only the effects of genetic aberrations but also the role of epigenetic alterations during the disease. Although dysregulations in epigenetic modulators such as histone methyltrasnferases have already been described for some hematologic malignancies, to date very limited data is available for CML, especially when considering the lysine methyltransferase MLL2/KMT2D and MLL3/KMT2C. METHODS: Here we investigated the expression profile of both genes in CML patients in different stages of the disease, in patients showing different responses to therapy with IM and in non-neoplastic control samples. Imatinib sensitive and resistant CML cell lines were also used to investigate whether treatment with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors interfered in their expression. RESULTS: In patients, both methyltransferases were either upregulated or with basal expression level during the chronic phase compared to controls. Interestingly, MLL3/KMT2C and specially MLL2/KMT2D levels decreased during disease progression correlating with distinct clinical stages. Furthermore, MLL2/KMT2D was decreased in patients resistant to IM treatment. A rescue in the expression of both MLL genes was observed in KCL22S, a CML cell line sensitive to IM, after treatment with dasatinib or nilotinib which was associated with a higher rate of apoptosis, an enhanced expression of p21 (CDKN1A) and a concomitant decrease in the expression of CDK2, CDK4 and Cyclin B1 (CCNB1) in comparison to untreated KCL22S control or IM resistant KCL22R cell line, which suggests involvement of p53 regulated pathway. CONCLUSION: Our results established a new association between MLL2/KMT2D and MLL3/KMT2C genes with CML and suggest that MLL2/KMT2D is associated with disease evolution and may be a potential marker to predict the development of therapy resistance.