The Relationship between Upper Esophageal Sphincter Manometry Function and Esophageal Motility Disorders.

OBJECTIVE: High-resolution manometry (HRM) provides measures of esophageal function which are used to classify esophageal motility disorders based on the Chicago Classification system. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) measures are obtained from HRM, but are not included in the classification system, rendering the relationship between UES measures and esophageal motility disorders unclear. Furthermore, changes in the acceptable amount of esophageal dysfunction between versions of this classification system has created controversy. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between UES measures and esophageal function. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Referral centre. METHODS: HRM studies from the Calgary Gut Motility Center were reviewed for UES mean basal pressure, mean residual pressure, relaxation time-to-nadir, relaxation duration, and recovery time. Patients were grouped by number of failed swallows according to different iterations of the Chicago Classification: 0 to 4 (Group 1), 5 to 7 (Group 2), and 8 to 10 (Group 3). RESULTS: 2114 patients (65.1% female, median age 56 y) were included. There were significant increases in UES mean basal pressure (P < .001), mean residual pressure (P < .001), relaxation duration (P < .001), and recovery time (P < .001) between groups. Positive correlations existed between number of failed swallows and UES mean basal pressure (r = 0.143; P < .001), mean residual pressure (r = 0.201; P < .001), relaxation duration (r = 0.145; P < .001), and recovery time (r = 0.168; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in UES measures exist among patients with failed swallows, with a positive correlation between UES dysfunction and increasing dysmotility. Our findings illustrate that UES measures are closely related to esophageal function, and that even minor esophageal dysfunction is related to UES dysfunction.

Relationship Between Resultant Force Vector Acting on Human Organs From Food Bolus and the Bolus Configuration During Swallowing Using Numerical Swallowing Simulation With Moving Particle Simulation Method.

This study investigates the forces exerted on organs during swallowing, specifically focusing on identifying forces other than those resulting from direct organ contact. Using a swallowing simulator based on the moving particle method, we simulated the swallowing process of healthy individuals upon the ingestion of thickened foods, which were simulated as shear-thinning flow without yield stress. We extracted the resultant force vectors acting on the organs and shape of the bolus at each time interval. The simulation results confirmed that the bolus originates from tongue movement and is transferred between the oral cavity and pharynx, with each organ's coordinated movements with the tongue occurring at their respective positions, as indicated by the balance of the resultant force vectors. Utilizing the information about the resultant force vectors obtained through simulations, we calculated the physical parameters of impulse, energy, and power. The variations in these physical parameters were aligned with the behaviors of both the biological system and the food bolus during swallowing. The force values calculated from the simulations closely approximate the theoretical values. Furthermore, the forces calculated from the simulations were relatively smaller than the force values derived from pressure information, such as that from high-resolution manometry and tongue pressure sensors. This difference can be attributed to the simulations extracting only the forces exerted on the organ by the food bolus. Force information on organs has the potential to provide a new interpretation of conventional mechanical indicators such as manometry and tongue pressure sensors.

Prospective Evaluation of Abelchia/RCPD Patients: Abnormalities in High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry.

Self-diagnosis of retrograde cricopharyngeus dysfunction (RCPD) or abelchia has been increasing over the past 5 years with patients seeking treatment for lifelong symptoms of inability to burp, neck gurgling, bloating, and flatulence. There is a distinct paucity of objective data in diagnosis and underlying pathophysiology of this disorder. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate patients with abelchia using standardized investigations to explore possible underlying mechanisms. METHODS: Patients presenting with clinical scenario consistent with RCPD were recruited into the study after informed consent. All patients underwent standardized investigations: Self reporting questionnaires EAT-10, VHI-10, and RSI scores, as well as esophagogastroscopy, barium swallow, and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), were performed. RESULTS: RCPD patients demonstrated a minor increase in the mean EAT-10 (5.2 ± 1.2) and normal RSI/VHI-10 scores. Barium swallow revealed 53% (CI 38%-64%) were abnormal with reflux with hiatus hernia (37%) and dysmotility (16%) as most common findings. HRM showed that 67% (CI 54%-78%) were abnormal. Ineffective motility was found in 41%, a further 23% showed a complete absence of peristalsis, whereas 33% were normal. CONCLUSIONS: RCPD is a clinical condition of lifelong inability to belch and associated symptoms. The underlying pathophysiology is poorly understood. This study demonstrates that a significant number of RCPD patients have abnormal esophageal neural network with high proportion of abnormal or absent esophageal peristalsis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Achalasia Cardia: A Case Series.

ABSTRACT: Achalasia cardia is a rare disorder that impacts the lower esophageal sphincter and esophageal body. Due to its wide range of symptoms, it can be difficult to diagnose. Here we report three cases of Achalasia Cardia during a period of 9 months. The first patient, an 18-year-old male, presented with dysphagia and was evaluated with barium swallow and high-resolution manometry (HRM) revealing Achalasia Cardia. In the second case, a 37-year-old female had a prolonged diagnostic journey due to multiple comorbidities before a barium swallow finally revealed achalasia cardia. The third patient, a 47-year-old female was promptly diagnosed with barium swallow. All the cases were successfully treated with laparoscopic Heller's myotomy with anterior Dor's fundoplication. This case series highlights the potential for delayed diagnosis and the importance of early recognition, tailored diagnostic approaches, and the efficacy of surgical management.

Anal sphincter function in rectal intussusception and high and low "take-off" external rectal prolapse-A prospective observational study.

AIM: Rectal intussusception (RI) and external rectal prolapse (ERP) are associated with anal sphincter dysfunction. The aim of this study was to examine sphincter function with anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR) in RI and two distinct phenotypes of ERP termed high and low "take-off". METHODS: A prospective study of patients with RI and ERP attending a tertiary pelvic floor unit. Clinical data, AAR, and conventional anal manometry were analysed according to the Oxford prolapse grade. RESULTS: A total of 108 (102 [94%] female, median age 62 years [range: 26-95]) patients were recruited into three groups according to prolapse grade: Oxford grades I and II (intrarectal RI, n = 34), Oxford grades III and IV (intra-anal RI, n = 35) and Oxford grade V (ERP, n = 39). As the grade of prolapse increased, resting AAR measurements of opening pressure, opening elastance, closing pressure, and closing elastance decreased (p < 0.001). Maximum resting pressure with manometry was reduced in ERP and intra-anal RI compared to intrarectal RI (p < 0.001). However, incremental squeeze function was not different between the three groups with either AAR or manometry (p > 0.05). There were no differences in AAR or manometry variables between grade IV RI (n = 18) and high take-off ERP (n = 20) (p > 0.05). By contrast, opening pressure (p = 0.010), closing pressure (p = 0.019) and elastance (p = 0.022) were reduced in low take-off ERP (n = 19). CONCLUSION: Increasing rectal prolapse grade is associated with reduced anal sphincter function at rest indicating internal anal sphincter dysfunction. Physiological differences exist between high and low take-off ERP with sphincter function in the former similar to that seen in grade IV RI.

Comparison of measurement of integrated relaxation pressure by esophageal manometry with analysis of swallowing sounds with artificial intelligence in patients with achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal motility disorders are mainly evaluated with high-resolution manometry (HRM) which is a time-consuming and uncomfortable procedure with potential adverse events. Acoustic characterization of the swallowing has the potential to be an alternative noninvasive procedure. METHODS: We compared the findings on HRM and swallowing sounds in 43 patients who were referred for evaluation of dysphagia. The sound analysis was done with empirical mode decomposition method and with artificial intelligence (AI) and the estimated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) from a two-layer neural network method was compared to measured IRP on HRM. The model then was tested in five patients. KEY RESULTS: IRP was estimated with high accuracy using the model developed with two-layer neural network method. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The analysis of acoustic properties of swallowing has the potential to be used for evaluation of esophageal motility disorders, this needs to be further evaluated in larger studies.

Distal contractile integral and other key predictors of mean nocturnal baseline impedance: The role of esophageal peristaltic vigor in mucosal permeability.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the relationship between distal contractile integral (DCI) and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) could shed light on new diagnostic and treatment strategies, specifically concerning nocturnal reflux. This study aimed to assess this relationship to enhance our comprehension of the interplay between esophageal contractility and mucosal permeability. METHODS: We identified adult patients who had high resolution esophageal manometry and pH-impedance tests performed within a 30-day period between December 2018 and March 2022. A random forest model was used to identify significant predictors of MNBI, assisting with variable selection for a following regression analysis. Subsequently, both univariable and multivariable regression models were utilized to measure the association between predictors and MNBI. KEY RESULTS: Our study included 188 patients, primarily referred for testing due to reflux. The most common motility diagnoses were normal (62%) followed by possible esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (22%). The mean DCI was 2020 mmHg∙s∙cm and MNBI was 3.05 kΩ. The random forest model identified 12 significant predictors for MNBI, key variables being acid exposure time (AET), total proximal reflux events, intraabdominal lower esophageal sphincter length, hiatal hernia presence, and DCI. Subsequent multivariable regression analyses demonstrated log AET (ß = -0.69, p = <0.001), total proximal reflux events (ß = -0.16, p = 0.008), hiatal hernia presence (ß = -0.82, p = 0.014), log DCI (ß = 1.26, p < 0.001), and age (ß = -0.13, p = 0.036) as being significantly associated with MNBI. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: DCI is a key manometric predictor of MNBI emphasizing the role of manometry in detecting reflux risk and the need for its consideration in reflux management.

BariClip: Outcomes and Complications from a Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic BariClip gastroplasty (LBCG) is a new reversible bariatric procedure designed to replicate the restrictive effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) by placing a clip vertically on the stomach. This technique achieves gastric lumen restriction without the need for resection, ensuring organ preservation and reversibility. However, concerns have arisen regarding potential complications such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), slippage, or erosion of the stomach. The aim of the study is to evaluate the outcomes and complications of LBCG. METHODS: This is a monocentric retrospective study. We analyzed 149 patients who underwent LBCG procedure between July 2021 and November 2023. A minimum follow-up period of 6 months was observed for all patients, recording clinically relevant GERD through GERD-Q score questionnaires. Weight loss was monitored through body mass index (BMI) and % total weight loss (%TWL), registered during follow-up visits. RESULTS: Overall, 149 patients were eligible for this study. Overall complication rate was 8% (12/149). The average BMI went from 40 ± 4.37 kg/m2 to 28 ± 4.29 kg/m2 (p < 0.05) in 6 months, while the mean %TWL was 22.6% after at least 6 months of follow-up. Clinically relevant GERD went from 18.1% (27/149) to 10.7% (16/149), p = 0.1262. As expected, also the PPI usage was not altered significantly (17.8% vs 16.4%), p = 0.8714. CONCLUSIONS: LBCG remains an experimental procedure that must be approached with caution. Nonetheless, the potential of LBCG to reproduce the effects of LSG while reducing GERD makes it a promising new reversible option for the treatment of morbid obesity.

Effects of capsaicin on esophageal peristalsis in humans using high resolution manometry.

BACKGROUND: Capsaicin-containing red pepper sauce suspension augments esophageal contraction amplitude on conventional manometry. This study used high-resolution manometry (HRM) to investigate if capsaicin infusion modulates segmental esophageal smooth muscle peristalsis in healthy adults. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers (mean age 37 years, 14 male) underwent HRM for the evaluation of primary peristalsis and secondary peristalsis using slow and rapid air distensions. Both primary and secondary peristalsis were assessed following infusions of capsaicin-containing red pepper sauce and saline. KEY RESULTS: Capsaicin infusion significantly increased heartburn symptoms compared to saline infusion (p < 0.001), and significantly decreased threshold volumes of secondary peristalsis during rapid air distensions (p = 0.02). The frequency of secondary peristalsis during rapid air distensions was significantly increased by capsaicin infusion (p = 0.03). Neither capsaicin infusion (p = 0.06) nor saline infusion (p = 0.27) altered threshold volume during slow air distensions. Capsaicin infusion significantly increased distal contractile integral (DCI) of primary peristalsis (p = 0.04), particularly in the proximal smooth muscle segment (p = 0.048). It enhanced secondary peristalsis during rapid air distensions (p = 0.003) but not during slow air distension (p = 0.23). Saline infusion significantly increased DCI of secondary peristalsis during rapid air distension (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Augmentation of distension-induced secondary peristalsis can be modulated by activation of capsaicin-sensitive afferents similar to mechanosensitive afferents. Capsaicin-induced augmentation of primary peristalsis isolates to the cholinergic-mediated proximal smooth muscle segment, which warrants study in ineffective esophageal motility to determine therapeutic potential.

Identifying the Hiccup-Induced Esophagogastric Waveform: A Case Series Report Using High-Resolution Manometry.

Hiccups result from involuntary contractions of the diaphragm, driven by a complex neuromuscular reflex. Three patients with persistent hiccups underwent esophageal high-resolution manometry during hiccup episodes, revealing a consistent finding: sustained contraction of the esophagogastric junction with intermittent pressure peaks. This pattern, termed the "Hiccup-Induced Esophagogastric Waveform," shows significant esophageal pressure changes linked to hiccup reflex. It may reflect a compensatory mechanism to expel excess esophageal residue or gas. These findings suggest hiccups could exacerbate symptoms of esophageal disorders, such as dysphagia and chest pain, and highlight the need for targeted therapeutic strategies. Further research is needed to explore these mechanisms.

Relationship Between Lower Esophageal Sphincter Muscles Thickness and Their Response to Pneumatic Dilation in Patients With Achalasia.

Background: Prognostic factors play a major role in managing achalasia patients treated with pneumatic dilatation (PD) and understanding the pathophysiology of the disease. In this regard, the muscular thickness of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) has drawn attention in recently published studies. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed achalasia were included consecutively in this study, and Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) was used to determine the thickness of longitudinal and circular muscles of LES. To determine the recurrence of symptoms, patients were followed up for one year using the Eckardt questionnaire. The relationship between pre-treatment LES muscle thickness and symptom recurrence was investigated. Results: Seventeen of nineteen treated patients were enrolled in this study and the data of sixteen patients was analyzed. Although not statistically significant, those with thinner LES had recurrent symptoms ( p-value = 0.08). Patients with a thicker LES (5.1 mm vs. 4.6 mm) initially responded better to pneumatic dilatation ( p-value = 0.03). After initial therapy, severe pain (daily pain) was strongly associated with symptom recurrence. Conclusions: Severe retrosternal chest pain and a thin LES appear to be surrogate markers for advanced disease and poor outcomes. Pre-treatment integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) seems to be a promising predictor of PD prognosis. Due to the study's heterogeneous population, the findings cannot be generalized to all achalasia patients, and larger-scale studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Esophageal tortuosity in achalasia: increased length-to-height ratio predicts inferior symptom relief and esophageal emptying following myotomy.

BACKGROUND: Current classification of achalasia does not account for variability in esophageal tortuosity. The esophageal length-to-height ratio (LHR) was developed to objectively quantify tortuosity, based on the premise that the esophagus must elongate to become tortuous. Hence, we assess the relationship of esophageal tortuosity, measured by LHR, to preoperative patient characteristics and post-myotomy outcomes, including longitudinal symptom relief and esophageal emptying. METHODS: From 01/2014 to 01/2020, 420 eligible adult patients underwent myotomy for achalasia at our institution, 216 (51%) Heller myotomy and 204 (49%) per-oral endoscopic myotomy. LHR was measured on pre- and first postoperative timed barium esophagram (TBE), with larger values signifying greater tortuosity. Variable predictiveness and risk-adjusted longitudinal estimates of symptom relief (Eckardt score ≤ 3) and complete emptying, in relation to LHR and manometric subtype, were estimated. RESULTS: Median [15th, 85th percentile] preoperative LHR was 1.04 [1.01, 1.10]. Preoperative esophageal width > 3 cm and age > 68 years were most predictive of increased LHR. Increased LHR corresponded with decreases in longitudinal postoperative symptom relief and complete esophageal emptying, with a 4% difference in symptom relief and 20% difference in complete emptying, as LHR increased from 1.0 to 1.16. After adjusting for patient factors, including LHR, manometric subtype was less predictive of symptom relief, with estimated symptom relief occurring in 4% fewer patients with Type III achalasia, compared to Types I and II. Overall, LHR decreased following myotomy in patients with an initially tortuous esophagus. CONCLUSION: Length-to-height ratio was the only variable highly predictive of both longitudinal post-myotomy symptom relief and complete esophageal emptying, whereas manometric subtype was less predictive. These findings highlight the importance of tortuosity in the treatment of patients with achalasia, suggesting that inclusion of esophageal morphology in future iterations of achalasia classification is warranted.

Evaluation of conventional anorectal manometry and biofeedback therapy in adolescents with functional constipation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the outcomes of conventional anorectal manometry (ARMM) testing and biofeedback therapy in adolescents with functional constipation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ARMM findings in patients aged 10-18 years with intractable constipation over a 4-year period was conducted. RESULTS: Of the 41 patients (mean age, 13.5±2.44 years) included, 20 (48.7%) were male. Rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) was positive in all patients. Group 1 had 31 patients with dyssynergic defecation (DD) and Group 2 had 10 patients without DD. Anal canal resting pressure, squeeze test pressure, rectal defecation pressure, and first and urge sensation volumes were similar between the groups. Maximum tolerated volume and the relaxation percentage of RAIR were higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (p<0.05). Among 31 patients referred for biofeedback therapy, 8 (25.6%) completed the program with complete resolution of their symptoms. The mean follow-up period for these patients was 21±14.7 months. CONCLUSION: DD is relatively common in patients with psychosocial adjustment disorders, and it can be diagnosed via ARMM. Despite the low rate of adherence to the therapy in the presented series, biofeedback therapy was highly effective in resolving the symptoms including soiling.

Clinical characteristics of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis and eosinophilic esophageal myositis based on esophageal motility.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) presents with various esophageal motility disorders, and some cases of hypercontractile esophagus (HE) are associated with eosinophilic esophageal myositis (EoEM). This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of patients with EoE and EoEM according to their esophageal motility. METHODS: The 28 patients with EoE and 2 patients with EoEM were divided into three groups based on esophageal motility: normal motility group, hypomotility group, and spastic contraction group. The clinical characteristics of the three groups were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: Among the 28 patients with EoE, there were 15 with normal esophageal motility, 9 with hypomotility (2 with absent contractility, 7 with ineffective esophageal motility), and 4 with spastic contractions (1 with type III achalasia, 1 with HE, 2 with unclassifiable multipeak contractions). The two patients with EoEM had HE. Most patients in the normal and hypomotility groups had typical endoscopic findings of EoE, whereas these typical findings were less common in the spastic contraction group (P < 0.001). Four of the five patients with esophageal stricture were in the hypomotility group (P = 0.036). The therapy method significantly differed between the three groups: the normal group had more patients that responded to a proton pump inhibitor or potassium-competitive acid blocker, the hypomotility group had more patients that responded to steroids, and the spastic contraction group contained two patients treated with per-oral endoscopic myotomy (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic findings and therapy methods differ between patients with EoE and EoEM based on the esophageal motility.

Advancing the predictive accuracy of PNTML in rectal prolapse: An ongoing quest.

Fecal incontinence is a common symptom among patients with rectal prolapse. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) testing can serve as a reference indicator for predicting the outcomes of rectal prolapse surgery, thereby assisting surgeons in formulating more appropriate surgical plans. The direct correlation between preoperative PNTML testing results and postoperative fecal incontinence in patients with rectal prolapse remains a contentious issue, necessitating further clarification. Thus, we analyze the existing publications from both clinical and statistical perspectives to comprehensively evaluate the accuracy of preoperative PNTML testing in rectal prolapse and provide some feasible statistical solutions.

Intrabiliary pressure in the pathophysiology of extra hepatic biliary obstruction.

Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of intrabiliary pressure (IBP) in the pathophysiology of extrahepatic biliary obstruction (EHBO) during percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). Materials and Methods: Adult patients with EHBO who underwent PTBD were prospectively enrolled. IBP was recorded during primary PTBD. The parameters of interest were age, gender, etiology of EHBO, baseline and post-PTBD liver function tests, duration for resolution of jaundice (decrease in total serum bilirubin ≥30% of baseline or <2 mg/dL), cholangitis, bile cultures, and serum albumin levels. The level of EHBO was divided into three types: Type 1 - secondary biliary confluence involved; Type 2 - primary biliary confluence involved; Type 3 - mid and distal common bile duct obstruction. Results: IBP was measured in 102 patients, and finally, 87 patients, including 52 (59.77%) females, were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 56.1±11.6 years. The most common etiology of EHBO was carcinoma of the gallbladder in 44 (50.6%) patients. The mean IBP was 18.41±3.91 mmHg. IBP was significantly higher in Type 3 EHBO compared to Type 1 and 2 (p=0.012). A significant correlation was seen between IBP and baseline total serum bilirubin (p<0.01). There was a negative correlation between IBP and baseline serum albumin (p=0.017). In 56.3% of patients, resolution of jaundice was observed by day 3, but this was not significantly associated with IBP (p=0.19). There was no correlation between IBP and cholangitis (p=0.97) or bacterial cultures (p=0.21). Conclusion: IBP was significantly associated with the type of EHBO, baseline serum bilirubin, and albumin levels. IBP could not predict cholangitis or the resolution of jaundice after PTBD.

[Personalized diagnosis of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease using 24-hour pH-impedance testing and high-resolution esophageal manometry].

AIM: To determine the phenotypic variants of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), hypersensitive esophagus (HSE), functional heartburn (FH) using 24-hour pH-impedance testing and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HSEM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five treatment-native symptomatic patients with newly diagnosed GERD and 48 control group subjects (CG) were examined. The mean age of the subjects was 45.0 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 41.0-48.9). Patients were grouped based on typical symptoms (heartburn, belching, regurgitation, odynophagy, dysphagia), medical history, endoscopy results, and 24-hour pH-impedance testing. Patients with typical symptoms of GERD and Grade B, C, D erosive esophagitis (EE) according to the Los Angeles Classification (LA) based on endoscopy were excluded from the further study. All patients without changes in the esophageal mucosa on endoscopy or with LA grade A EE (presumably NERD) underwent 24-hour pH-impedance testing and HSEM without proton pump inhibitors. Acid exposure, acid reflux count, symptom association with reflux (with symptom index and symptom association with reflux), mean nocturnal impedance, and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index were assessed. The structure (presence or absence of a hiatal hernia) and function (presence or absence of the lower esophageal sphincter hypotonia) of the esophagogastric junction, as well as the motor function of the thoracic esophagus, were assessed using HSEM. The results of the HSEM were interpreted according to the Chicago Classification, 3rd edition (2015). RESULTS: The number of acid refluxes in patients with NERD was 71.0 (95% CI 58.4-83.7), in subjects with HSE - 38.5 (95% CI 28.3-49.0), with FH - 13.0 (95% CI 6.5-18.2), in CG - 16.5 (95% CI 9.0-21.0). The average nocturnal basal impedance was 1300 ohms (95% CI 1000-1986) in patients with NERD, 1725 ohms (95% CI 1338-2261) in patients with HSE, 2760 ohms (95% CI 2453-3499) in FH, 2515 ohms (95% CI 2283-2700) in CG. The index of post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave in patients with NERD was 61% (95% CI 57-71), with HSE - 85% (95% CI 82-88), with FH - 71% (95% CI 64-78), in CG - 66% (95% CI 63-69). Hiatal hernia and/or hypotonia of the LES were more common in patients with NERD (23%) than in CG (13.3%). Ineffective motility was detected in 34% of patients with NERD, in 23% of subject with FH and in 66.7% of patients with HSE. CONCLUSION: The results support the hypothesis that patients with GERD symptoms represent a heterogeneous population. 24-hour pH-impedance testing and HSEM helps to differentiate endoscopically negative patients with GERD symptoms and patients with Grade A EE by LA to NERD, HSE and FH.

Beyond the numbers: Impact of obesity on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) outcomes in women.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk profiles, anatomical, and functional outcomes between obese and non-obese women who experienced obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). METHODS: A retrospective electronic database study was conducted at Cork University Maternity Hospital (CUMH). Women with missing data/repairs conducted outside CUMH were excluded. Participants were categorized into obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2) groups. Primary measure was a composite adverse outcome assessed 6 months post-delivery, including one or more of the following: resting pressure <40 mmHg, squeezing pressure <100 mmHg, defects in the internal and/or external anal sphincter. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 28. RESULTS: Among the 349 women included in the study, 285 (81.7%) had a BMI <30 kg/m2 and 64 (18.3%) had a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. Gestational diabetes was significantly higher in obese women. No significant differences were observed in newborn weight or mode of delivery. The majority of tears were classified as grade 3B in both groups. Attendance rates at the OASI clinic did not differ between the groups. Among those attending, no statistical differences were noted in manometry results, which were reduced in both groups. Rates of internal anal sphincter defects were lower in the obese group (7.0% vs 15.6%, P = 0.15) and external anal sphincter defects were significantly lower in obese women (0% vs 9.1%, P = 0.04). No difference was found in the rates of composite adverse outcomes between the groups. CONCLUSION: Functional outcomes and manometry results did not differ, but non-obese women had higher rates of anatomical defects in OASI, requiring further study.

Sedation and Endoscopy-Assisted High-Resolution Manometry (SEA-HRM) in Patients Who Previously Failed Standard Esophageal Manometry.

Objectives: Esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) is the gold standard for diagnosing esophageal motility disorders, but it may be poorly tolerated and unsuccessful. We sought to evaluate a protocol for sedation and endoscopy-assisted (SEA) HRM in patients who previously failed standard HRM and assess patient perspectives towards it. Methods: Adult patients who previously failed HRM were prospectively enrolled. Under propofol sedation, an upper endoscopy was performed during which the HRM catheter was advanced under endoscopic visualization. If the catheter did not reach the stomach on its own, the endoscope itself or a snare was used to help it traverse the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). Results: Thirty patients participated (mean age 67.8, 70% female). The technical success of SEA-HRM was 100%. Twenty-two (73.3%) were diagnosed with a motility disorder including thirteen (43.3%) with achalasia. Eighteen (60%) had previously failed HRM due to discomfort/intolerance, while twelve (40%) failed due to catheter coiling in the esophagus. Subjects in the coiling group were more likely to need endoscopic assistance to traverse the EGJ (91.7% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.001) and have a motility disorder (100.0% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.010), including achalasia (75.0% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.004), compared to the discomfort/intolerance group. All patients preferred SEA-HRM and rated it higher than standard HRM (9.5 ± 1.3 vs. 1.9 ± 2.1, p = <0.001, on a scale of 1-10). Conclusions: SEA-HRM is a highly successful and well-tolerated option in patients who previously failed standard HRM. This should be the recommended approach in cases of failed HRM rather than secondary tests of esophageal motility.