Medicaid managed care restrictions on medications for the treatment of opioid use disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether Medicaid managed care plan (MCP) utilization management policies for buprenorphine-naloxone and injectable naltrexone are related to key state Medicaid program policy decisions. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: We abstracted data on state Medicaid regulatory and policy information from publicly available sources and publicly available insurance benefit documentation from all 241 Medicaid MCPs operating in 2021. STUDY DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, we used bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine whether Medicaid MCP prior authorization and quantity limits on receipt of buprenorphine and injectable naltrexone were associated with key state Medicaid choices to leverage federal funds to expand coverage and eligibility (Medicaid expansion, 1115 waivers) and to regulate Medicaid MCPs (uniform preferred drug lists, medical loss ratio remittance). Models were adjusted for MCP characteristics, including profit status, behavioral health contracting arrangement, National Committee for Quality Assurance accreditation, size, market share, and state opioid overdose death rates. Average marginal effects (AME) were reported. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Utilization management was common among MCPs, and restrictions were more commonly applied to buprenorphine than injectable naltrexone, despite its higher cost. States that required MCPs to comply with utilization management policies stipulated in a uniform preferred drug list were more likely to require prior authorization for buprenorphine (AME: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.15-0.42) and injectable naltrexone (AME: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.12-0.38). MCPs in states that required plans to pay back earnings above a certain threshold were less likely to require prior authorization for buprenorphine (AME: -0.30, 95% CI: -0.43 to -0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Restrictions on medications for opioid use disorder are widespread among MCPs and vary by medication. State Medicaid regulatory and policy characteristics were strongly linked to MCPs' utilization management approaches. State Medicaid policy and contracting approaches may be levers to eliminate utilization management restrictions on medications for opioid use disorder.

Experiences with care coordination and backup plans in home and community based services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kansas.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic was an emergency event during which backup plans became widely relevant. Although backup plans are required for Medicaid-funded Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) as a key risk management strategy, we know little about their effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore whether backup plans and care coordination met the needs of HCBS consumers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kansas. METHODS: An interactive, convergent mixed-methods design within a community-based participatory research framework was used. Data came from 70 in-depth interviews with HCBS consumers, caregivers, workers, and providers, as well as 100 surveys from consumers, asking about experiences receiving or providing care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kansas. Inductive coding was used to identify major themes for the qualitative data. Descriptive and bivariate analysis were used for quantitative data. RESULTS: One-third of survey respondents reported not having a backup plan and 39% went without formal homecare services for at least 2 consecutive weeks. The pandemic exacerbated and exposed deficiencies in care coordination and backup plans in a managed care environment. Interview participants expressed great need for backup workers during the pandemic but struggled to find these supports. Although family, friends, and providers stepped in to help fill gaps, there remained many unmet care needs. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that improvements are needed in care coordination to support the development and maintenance of backup plans that can be successfully drawn on to avoid interruptions to care.

Disparities in insurance status negatively affect patients with infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

PURPOSE: Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) is suspected to have worse outcomes when length of illness prior to presentation is prolonged. Our objective was to evaluate how social determinants of health influence medical care and outcomes for babies with IHPS. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed over 10 years. Census data were used as proxy for socioeconomic status via Geo-Identification codes and correlated with food access and social vulnerability variables. The cohort was subdivided to understand the impact of Medicaid Managed Care (MMC). RESULTS: The cohort (279 cases) was divided into two groups; early group from 2011 to 2015 and late from 2016 to 2021. Cases in the late group were older at the time of presentation (41.5 vs. 36.5 days; p = 0.022) and presented later in the disease course (12.8 vs. 8.9 days; p = 0.021). There was no difference in race (p = 0.282), gender (p = 0.874), or length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who presented with IHPS after implementation of phased MMC were older, had a longer symptomatic course, and shorter pylorus measurements. Patients with public insurance after the implementation of MMC were more likely to follow-up with an outpatient pediatrician within a month of hospitalization. These results suggest that MMC may have improved access to care for infants with IHPS.

Commercial Insurer Market Power and Medicaid Managed Care Networks.

Over 70% of Medicaid beneficiaries are enrolled in Medicaid managed care (MMC). MMC provider networks therefore represent a critical determinant of access to the Medicaid program. Many MMC insurers also participate in commercial insurance markets where prices are high, and some insurers exercise considerable market power. In this paper, we examined the relationship between commercial insurer market power and MMC physician network breadth using linked national enrollment data and provider directory data. Insurers with more commercial market power had broader Medicaid physician networks. Insurers with over 30% market share had 37.3% broader Medicaid networks than insurers in the same county that had no commercial market share. These differences were driven by greater breadth among primary care providers, as well as other specialists including OB/GYNs, surgeons, neurologists, and cardiologists. Commercial insurance market power may have spillovers on access to care for MMC beneficiaries.

Building an Integrated Data Infrastructure to Examine the Spectrum of Suicide Risk Factors in Philadelphia Medicaid.

While there are many data-driven approaches to identifying individuals at risk of suicide, they tend to focus on clinical risk factors, such as previous psychiatric hospitalizations, and rarely include risk factors that occur in nonclinical settings, such as jails or emergency shelters. A better understanding of system-level encounters by individuals at risk of suicide could help inform suicide prevention efforts. In Philadelphia, we built a community-level data infrastructure that encompassed suicide death records, behavioral health claims, incarceration episodes, emergency housing episodes, and involuntary commitment petitions to examine a broader spectrum of suicide risk factors. Here, we describe the development of the data infrastructure, present key trends in suicide deaths in Philadelphia, and, for the Medicaid-eligible population, determine whether suicide decedents were more likely to interact with the behavioral health, carceral, and housing service systems compared to Medicaid-eligible Philadelphians who did not die by suicide. Between 2003 and 2018, there was an increase in the number of annual suicide deaths among Medicaid-eligible individuals, in part due to changes in Medicaid eligibility. There were disproportionately more suicide deaths among Black and Hispanic individuals who were Medicaid-eligible, who were younger on average, compared to suicide decedents who were never Medicaid-eligible. However, when we accounted for the racial and ethnic composition of the Medicaid population at large, we found that White individuals were four times as likely to die by suicide, while Asian, Black, Hispanic, and individuals of other races were less likely to die by suicide. Overall, 58% of individuals who were Medicaid-eligible and died by suicide had at least one Medicaid-funded behavioral health claim, 10% had at least one emergency housing episode, 25% had at least one incarceration episode, and 22% had at least one involuntary commitment. By developing a data infrastructure that can incorporate a broader spectrum of risk factors for suicide, we demonstrate how communities can harness administrative data to inform suicide prevention efforts. Our findings point to the need for suicide prevention in nonclinical settings such as jails and emergency shelters, and demonstrate important trends in suicide deaths in the Medicaid population.

State Policy and the Breadth of Buprenorphine-Prescriber Networks in Medicaid Managed Care.

Provider networks in Medicaid Managed Care (MMC) play a crucial role in ensuring access to buprenorphine, a highly effective treatment for opioid use disorder. Using a difference-in-differences approach that compares network breadth across provider specialties and market segments within the same state, we investigated the association between three Medicaid policies and the breadth of MMC networks for buprenorphine prescribers: Medicaid expansion, substance use disorder (SUD) network adequacy criteria, and SUD carveouts. We found that both Medicaid expansion and SUD network adequacy criteria were associated with substantially increased breadth in buprenorphine-prescriber networks in MMC. In both cases, we found that the associations were largely driven by increases in the network breadth of primary care physician prescribers. Our findings suggest that Medicaid expansion and SUD network adequacy criteria may be effective strategies at states' disposal to improve access to buprenorphine.

Observational Analysis of a Generalized, Health Plan-led Community Health Worker Intervention in Medicaid.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: In 2018, a Medicaid managed care plan launched a new community health worker (CHW) initiative in several counties within a state, designed to improve the health and quality of life of members who could benefit from additional services. The CHW program involved telephonic and face-to-face visits from CHWs who provided support, empowerment, and education to members, while identifying and addressing health and social issues. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a generalized (not disease-specific), health plan-led CHW program on overall healthcare use and spending. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from adult members who received the CHW intervention (N = 538 participants) compared to those who were identified for participation but were unable to be reached (N = 435 nonparticipants). Outcomes measures included healthcare utilization, including scheduled and emergency inpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and outpatient visits; and healthcare spending. The follow-up period for all outcome measures was 6 months. Using generalized linear models, 6-month change scores were regressed on baseline characteristics to adjust for between-group differences (eg, age, sex, comorbidities) and an indicator for group. RESULTS: Program participants experienced a greater increase in outpatient evaluation and management visits (0.09 per member per month [PMPM]) than the comparison group during the first 6 months of the program. This greater increase was observed across in-person (0.07 PMPM), telehealth (0.03 PMPM), and primary care (0.06 PMPM) visits. There was no observed difference in inpatient admissions, ED utilization or allowed medical spending and pharmacy spending. CONCLUSIONS: A health plan-led CHW program successfully increased multiple forms of outpatient utilization in a historically disadvantaged population of patients. Health plans may be particularly well positioned to finance, sustain, and scale programs that address social drivers of health.

The Need for Transparency in Medicaid Managed Care: Section 1115 Waiver Requirements as a Blueprint.

Medicaid plays a significant role in the health care space, providing insurance coverage to nearly one quarter of the U.S. population. In recent years, managed care organizations have taken on an increasingly prominent role in the Medicaid space, and in many instances have become the sole insurance option for Medicaid recipients. The scale and method of implementation for managed care programs has varied widely from state to state. This Note discusses the many methods by which a state can enact managed care within its Medicaid program, and summarizes the challenges with assessing the success of such programs. It proposes a uniform approach to managed care reporting requirements designed to increase transparency and accountability across state lines, and in turn ensure quality care for Medicaid managed care beneficiaries.

Managing prior approval for site-of-service referrals: an algorithmic approach.

OBJECTIVES: Many payers and health care providers are either currently using or considering use of prior authorization schemes to redirect patient care away from hospital outpatient departments toward free-standing ambulatory surgical centers owing to the payment differential between these facilities. In this work we work with a medium size payer to develop and lay out a process for analysis of claims data that allows payers to conservatively estimate potential savings from such policies based on their specific case mix and provider network. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed payment information for a medium-sized managed care organization to identify movable cases that can reduce costs, estimate potential savings, and recommend implementation policy alternatives. METHODS: We analyze payment data, including all professional and institutional fees over a 15-month period. A rules-based algorithm was developed to identify episodes of care with at least one alternate site for each episode, and potential savings from a site-of-service policy. RESULTS: Data on 64,884 episodes of care were identified as possible instances that could be subject to the policy. Of those, 7,679 were found to be attractive candidates for movement. Total projected savings was approximately $8.2 million, or over $1,000 per case. CONCLUSIONS: Instituting a site-of-service policy can produce meaningful savings for small and medium payers. Tailoring the policy to the specific patient and provider population can increase the efficacy of such policies in comparison to policies previously established by other payers.

Assessment of Handicapping Labio-Lingual Deviation index scoring methods and their effect on orthodontic treatment coverage by Medicaid.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of Handicapping Labio-Lingual Deviation index (HLDI) scoring methods as calculated by digital models (DM) and visual inspection (VI) and their agreement to either meet or fail to meet the Medicaid coverage threshold. An additional objective was to assess the agreement with Medicaid managed care organizations (MCO) coverage decisions. METHODS: The study included the orthodontic records of 401 patients who applied for Medicaid coverage. Two methods were used to calculate HLDI scores: (1) Measurements derived from DMs using OrthoCAD software; and (2) VI of intraoral photographs. The levels of agreement between the two methods and the Medicaid coverage decision by a MCO were evaluated. RESULTS: The study results show a high level of agreement between the two HLDI calculation methods, DM and VI evaluation methods(Cramer's V = 0.812). The agreement on coverage decisions (eligible/not eligible) between VI methods and the official MCO decision was Cramer's V = 0.318. The agreement on coverage decisions between the DM method and the official MCO decision was Cramer's V = 0.318. CONCLUSIONS: MCO assessment results of the patients using HLDI showed low agreement with the results obtained by DM and VI scoring methods used in this study. The Illinois Medicaid system is apparently using unknown factors other than the HLDI score when determining when approving or disapproving orthodontic coverage. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: MCO decisions on eligibility for orthodontic treatment coverage were not consistent with patients' treatment needs.

Health care utilization among beneficiaries with diabetes from federally qualified health centers: Analysis from a Medicaid managed care organization.

We examined health care utilization among federally qualified health center (FQHCs) users from a Medicaid managed care organization based on 2016 administrative claims data (n = 8,402). FQHC users had fewer primary care visits (Adjusted Incidence Rate Ratios (aIRR): 0.82; 95% CI: 0.76-0.88) compared with non-FQHC users. Statistically significant differences were not observed in emergency department visits (aIRR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.98-1.46) and hospitalizations (aIRR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.80-1.34). FQHCs provide comprehensive primary care to Medicaid managed care beneficiaries with diabetes in fewer PCP visits. Results provide evidence to health policy experts and MCOs to increase provider network contracting with FQHCs.

Disruptions to the patient-provider relationship and patient utilization and outcomes: Evidence from medicaid managed care.

The patient-provider relationship is considered a cornerstone to delivering high-value healthcare. However, in Medicaid managed care settings, disruptions to this relationship are disproportionately common. In this paper, I evaluate the impact of a primary provider's exit from a Medicaid managed care plan on adult beneficiary healthcare utilization and outcomes. Using an event study approach, I estimate a 5% decrease in the number of beneficiaries with primary care visits in the year following the exit, with slightly larger effects in terms of percentage points for patients with chronic conditions. Additionally, I observe a nearly 50% increase in the number of beneficiaries with a chronic condition who are hospitalized following a disruption.

Framing the front door: co-creating a home health care assessment of service need for children with disabilities.

This paper details the co-creation of a home health assessment tool for children with disabilities in the context of state-level systems change from traditional Medicaid to Medicaid managed care. A community based, sequential, mixed methods design was used to co-develop the assessment. A process evaluation highlighted community members' experiences with Medicaid managed care. Community members identified issues related to appropriateness of items and loss of services and recommended a dual assessment process to address concerns. Results indicated that 72% of items functioned well. Community members felt that organizational policies and the accuracy of clinical information obtained during assessment processes led directly to loss of services. Co-creating the assessment with caregivers of children with disabilities led to a comprehensive, person-centered, and holistic tool. The process buttressed several concrete systems and policy actions to improve home health care for children with disabilities in Medicaid managed care.

Impact of the 1115 behavioral health Medicaid waiver on adult Medicaid beneficiaries in New York State.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the Health and Recovery Plan (HARP), a capitated special needs Medicaid managed care product that fully integrates physical and behavioral health delivery systems in New York State. DATA SOURCES: 2013-2019 claims and encounters data on continuously enrolled individuals from the New York State Medicaid data system. STUDY DESIGN: We used a difference-in-difference approach with inverse probability of exposure weights to compare service use outcomes in individuals enrolled in the HARP versus HARP eligible comparison group in two regions, New York City (NYC) pre- (2013-2015) versus post- (2016-2018) intervention periods, and rest of the state (ROS) pre- (2014-2016) versus post- (2017-2019) intervention periods. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Not applicable. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: HARPs were associated with a relative decrease in all-cause (RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.90), behavioral health-related (RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.96), and nonbehavioral-related (RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.78-0.97) stays in the NYC region. In the ROS region, HARPs were associated with a relative decrease in all-cause (RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.94) and behavioral health-related (RR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.91) stays. Regarding outpatient visits, the HARPs benefit package were associated with a relative increase in behavioral health (RR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.28) and nonbehavioral health (RR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.15) clinic visits in the NYC region. In the ROS region, the HARPs were associated with relative increases in behavioral health (RR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.32-1.64) and nonbehavioral health (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.25) clinic visits. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients with similar clinical needs, HARPs were associated with a relative increase in services used and led to a better engagement in the HARPs group regardless of the overall decline in services used pre- to postperiod.

Managed Care and Value-Based Payment: The Relationship Between Quality of Life Outcomes and Emergency Room Utilization.

Although Medicaid managed care is a growing service model, there is a limited evidence base regarding quality and value-based payment standards for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). This study examined the relationship between emergency room utilization and quality of life outcomes. We analyzed secondary Personal Outcome Measures quality of life and emergency room utilization data from 251 people with IDD. According to our findings, people with IDD with continuity and security in their lives and/or who participated in the life of the community had fewer emergency room visits, regardless of their impairment severity or dual diagnosis status. As such, the number of emergency room visits needed, and the potential expenditures associated, may be reduced by focusing on quality outcomes.

Social determinants of health, emergency department utilization, and people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

BACKGROUND: People with intellectual and developmental disabilities' (IDD's) health is largely dependent on the government services they receive. Medicaid managed care has emerged as one mechanism used to provide services to people with disabilities in an attempt to reduce costs. In managed care, there has been an emphasis on reducing emergency department visits and hospital admissions in an effort to reduce expenditures. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine the impact social determinants of health -"conditions in the environments in which people are born, live, learn, work, play, worship, and age that affect a wide range of health, functioning, and quality-of-life outcomes and risks" (n.p.)1 - had on the emergency department utilization of people with IDD. METHODS: We had the following research question: what is the relationship between social determinants and emergency department utilization (visits) among adults with IDD? To explore this research question, a negative binomial regression analysis was used with secondary social determinant outcomes data (from Personal Outcome Measures®) and emergency department visit data from a random sample of 251 people with IDD. We also examined relationships with participants' demographics. RESULTS: Our findings revealed for every one unit increase in the number of social determinant outcomes present, there was a 7.97% decrease in emergency department visits. There were also significant relationships between emergency department visits, and complex support needs, intellectual disability level, primary communication method, and residence type. CONCLUSIONS: Social determinants are critical to promote the quality of life and health equity of people with IDD.

Association of Provider Performance with Changes in Insurance Networks.

BACKGROUND: Medicaid managed care plans change provider networks frequently, yet there is no evidence about the performance of exiting providers relative to those that remain. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between provider cost and quality and network exit. DESIGN: Observational study with provider network directory data linked to administrative claims from managed care plans in Tennessee's Medicaid program during the period 2010-2016. PARTICIPANTS: 1,966,022 recipients assigned to 9593 unique providers. MAIN MEASURES: Exposures were risk-adjusted total costs of care and nine measures from the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) were used to construct a composite annual indicators of provider performance on quality. Outcome was provider exit from a Medicaid managed care plan. Differences in quality and cost between providers that exited and remained in managed care networks were estimated using a propensity score model to match exiting to nonexiting providers. KEY RESULTS: Over our study period, we found that 21% of participating providers exited at least one of the Medicaid managed care plans in Tennessee. As compared with providers that remained in networks, those that exited performed 3.8 percentage points [95% CI, 2.3, 5.3] worse on quality as measured by a composite of the nine HEDIS quality metrics. However, 22% of exiting providers performed above average in quality and cost and only 29% of exiting providers had lower than average quality scores and higher than average costs. Overall, exiting providers had lower aggregate costs in terms of the annual unadjusted cost of care per-member-month - $21.57 [95% CI, - $41.02, - $2.13], though difference in annual risk-adjusted cost per-member-month was nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Providers exiting Medicaid managed care plans appear to have lower quality scores in the year prior to their exit than the providers who remain in network. Our study did not show that managed care plans disproportionately drop high-cost providers.

Buying Health For North Carolinians: Addressing Nonmedical Drivers Of Health At Scale.

Since 2017 the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services has asked how its resources could be optimized to buy health, not only health care. This has led the department to incorporate whole-person care into all of its priorities, including building a statewide infrastructure and implementing incentives to address nonmedical drivers of health-focusing on food, housing, transportation, employment, and interpersonal safety/toxic stress. This article describes four interconnected initiatives that the department has implemented or is implementing to begin integrating medical and nonmedical drivers of health. This multifaceted effort involves many partners and includes financial incentives for commercial payers, Medicare, and Medicaid that are aligned with whole-person care; a standardized screening process to identify people with unmet social resource needs across all populations; NCCARE360, the first statewide network linking health care and human services providers to one another with a shared technology platform; and a large-scale Medicaid pilot to evaluate the impact of nonmedical health interventions on health outcomes and health care costs. North Carolina's interconnected initiatives can help inform efforts around the US and generate needed evidence on how to implement systems through public-private partnerships to address nonmedical drivers of health at scale.

The Impact of Mental Health Conditions on Public Insurance Costs of Treating HIV/AIDS.

Medicare and Medicaid insurance claims data for Californians living with HIV are analyzed in order to determine: (1)The prevalence of treatment for particular mental health diagnoses among people living with HIV (PLWH) with Medicare or Medicaid insurance in 2010; (2)The relationship between individual mental health conditions and total medical care expenditures; (3)The impact of individual mental health diagnoses on the cost of treating non-mental health conditions; and (4)The implications of the cost of mental health diagnoses for setting managed care capitation payments. We find that the prevalence of mental health conditions among PLWH is high (23% among Medicare and 28% among Medicaid enrollees). PLWH with mental health conditions have significantly higher treatment costs for both mental health and non-mental health conditions. Setting managed care capitations that account for these greater expenditures is necessary to preserve access to both mental health and physical health services for PLWH and mental health conditions.

Longitudinal appraisals of family caregiving for people with disabilities enrolled in Medicaid managed care.

Objective: To longitudinally examine the impact of public family support on appraisals of caregiving burden, satisfaction, and self-efficacy among families of adults with disabilities.Background: Little research exists on family support and the family experience within Medicaid managed care across disabilities and longitudinally.Method: Illinois Medicaid managed care enrollees with disabilities and their family members completed surveys over 2 years. Only families and enrollees who lived together were included (N = 182 pairs).Results: Family members with more unmet family support needs had increased caregiving burden and decreased satisfaction and self-efficacy. Family members providing more unpaid care reported higher burden. Black family members had significantly lower burden, and parents had significantly lower satisfaction and self-efficacy. Family members of enrollees with intellectual and developmental disabilities had higher self-efficacy.Conclusion: Family support is important to caregiving appraisals.Implications: There is a need for including family needs for services within assessments for services and within policy.Implications for rehabilitationFamilies provide a substantial amount of care for their family members with disabilities.More family support for family caregivers of people with disabilities is related to better caregiving appraisals within Medicaid managed care.Family caregiver support needs should be taken into account within policy and service assessments.