The doctor will not see you now: investigating the social determinants of specialist care using the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).

Background: The Canada Health Act mandates universal access to medical services for all Canadians. Despite this, there are significant disparities in access based on socioeconomic status, race and ethnicity, immigrant status, and indigeneity. However, there is limited evidence on the use of specialist services among older adults in Canada. The primary objective of this study is to identify the associations of social determinants of health with access to medical specialist services for Canadians aged 45 years and older. The second objective is to identify the reasons for not being able to access the needed specialist care. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging survey was conducted. Based on the Andersen's model of health services use, a multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate the associations between 'not being able to access the needed specialist service(s) in the last 12 months' and individual-level sociodemographic determinants. Results: Approximately 97% of those who required specialist care in the last year were able to visit a specialist. Of the participants who were not able to access the needed specialist services, about half (50.90%) were still waiting for a visit. The following factors were associated with greater difficulty in accessing specialist care: being younger (45-54 years), living in a rural area, having some post-secondary education, having a household income below $50,000 a year, not having a family physician, and having fair or poor perceived general health. Residents of British Columbia and Nova Scotia had a higher likelihood of reporting difficulty compared to those residing in Ontario. Conclusion: While a majority of respondents were able to access specialist services when needed, those who had difficulty in accessing care were more likely to come from socially marginalized groups. Targeted policy interventions and improved health system coordination can reduce these barriers to care.

Bullying within specialist medical training in Australia: Analysis of the medical training survey, 2020-2023.

OBJECTIVE: Bullying is common in medical specialist training in Australia. To understand bullying rates across medical specialist training programs, we analyse the recent Medical Training Survey, administered by the Medical Board of Australia to all registered medical practitioners. METHODS: Medical Training Survey data were extracted and averaged from 2020 to 2023. RESULTS: Many speciality trainees reported personally experiencing or witnessing bullying. This was lowest in general practice (13% personally experienced and 15% witnessed) and highest in obstetrics and gynaecology (27% and 41%). The highest rate of bullying by supervisors was in surgery: 60% of surgical trainees stated that when they were bullied it was by their supervisor. Within psychiatry, 22% of trainees had personally experienced bullying and 32% of trainees had witnessed bullying. When they were bullied, the perpetrator was less commonly a supervisor (40%). In all specialities, there was a very low percentage of bullying which was reported, and was identified as having a satisfactory outcome: the most satisfactory outcomes (13%) were in general practice. CONCLUSION: Current rates of bullying for medical specialist trainees, the reluctance to report, as well as the lack of satisfactory outcomes, is of grave concern for Australian healthcare. This requires urgent attention at a systems level.

[Interdisciplinary centers for autoimmune diseases in Germany]. / Interdisziplinäre Zentren für Autoimmunerkrankungen in Deutschland.

BACKGROUND: Interdisciplinary medical treatment is required to care for patients with complex autoimmune diseases. Although there are an increasing number of interdisciplinary centers for autoimmune diseases in Germany, they are not yet available throughout the country and the focuses and interdisciplinary structures are not organized according to a generally agreed standard. Furthermore, they are not regularly reflected in the general care structure. THE AIM OF THE WORK: To analyze the care structure using as an example an established center and a clinical case to demonstrate the usefulness of in-house standardized procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In order to determine the status quo regarding interdisciplinary centers for autoimmune diseases in Germany, a university hospital is exemplarily presented for a structural analysis and a case presentation from another center to demonstrate the importance of an interdisciplinary patient care. RESULTS: At the selected center for autoimmune diseases of the university hospital, patients with autoimmune diseases receive interdisciplinary care from experts from various disciplines. The structures are anchored in an organizational chart. The case report demonstrates a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic pathway (standardized operating procedures, SOP) in a patient with systemic sclerosis and lung involvement. DISCUSSION: The article discusses which measures are necessary across disciplines for comprehensive diagnostics and treatment of certain autoimmune diseases, which challenges arise during implementation and which advantages can arise compared to guidelines because, among other things, they can be immediately adapted. The establishment of a national consensus for the structure, necessary settings and implementation into patient care within an interdisciplinary center for autoimmune diseases is desirable.

Medical Specialist Care Utilization Prior to the Explantation of Cosmetic Silicone Breast Implants: A Nationwide Retrospective Data Linkage Study.

BACKGROUND: Explantation is the proposed treatment for breast implant illness (BII). Little is known about which medical specialists are visited and what diagnoses are made before explantation is provided as the treatment. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated medical specialist care utilization in women with cosmetic breast implants who underwent explantation compared to women who chose breast implant replacement surgery and to women without breast implants. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using data linkage with the Dutch Breast Implant Registry and the Dutch health insurance claims database. Visits to medical specialists were examined over the 3 years before explantation. A total of 832 explantation patients were matched and compared to 1463 breast implant replacement patients and 1664 women without breast implants. RESULTS: Explantation patients were more likely to have visited > 5 different medical specialties compared to both replacement patients (12.3% vs. 5.7%; p < 0.001) and women without breast implants (12.3% vs. 3.7%; p < 0.001). Among explantation patients, women who underwent explantation because of BII were more likely to have visited > 5 different medical specialties compared to women who underwent explantation because of other reasons (25.0% vs. 11.0%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Women who underwent explantation of breast implants had higher utilization of medical specialist care in the years before explantation compared to women who underwent breast implant replacement surgery and women without breast implants. Medical specialist care use was especially high among women for whom BII was the registered reason for explantation. These findings suggest further research is needed into the link between BII and the use of medical specialist care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Elder abuse geriatrics: describing an important new medical specialist.

Elder mistreatment, including elder abuse and neglect, is a difficult diagnosis to make and manage for most providers. To address this, two elder abuse consultation teams were developed for patients in the hospital and emergency department settings. As these teams have developed, the providers involved have obtained specialized training and experience that we believe contributes to a new field of elder abuse geriatrics, a corollary to the well-established field of child abuse pediatrics. Providers working in this field require specialized training and have a specialized scope of practice that includes forensic evaluation, evaluation of cognition and capacity, care coordination and advocacy for victims of abuse, and collaboration with protective services and law enforcement. Here we describe the training, scope of practice, ethical role, and best practices for elder mistreatment medical consultation. We hope this will serve as a starting point for this new and important medical specialty.

Medical specialists' use and opinion of video consultation in Denmark: a survey study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the use of telemedicine which is seen as a possibility to reduce the pressure on healthcare systems globally. However, little research has been carried out on video as a consultation medium in medical specialists' practice. This study investigated the use of and opinion on video consultation among specialists in Denmark. METHODS: An online survey on use of video consultation, as well as relevance of and opinion on video consultation, was distributed to all 963 medical specialists in private practice in Denmark throughout May and June 2022, resulting in 499 complete answers (response rate: 51.8%). Data were analysed using descriptive and logistic regression analyses, and data from open text fields were analysed using thematic network analysis. RESULTS: Among the respondents, 62.2% had never used video consultation, while 23.4% were currently using video consultation, most particularly among psychiatrists. A total of 47.3% found video consultation medically irrelevant to their specialty, especially radiologists, plastic surgeons, ophthalmologists and otorhinolaryngologists. According to the specialists, video consultation was most suitable for follow-up consultations and simple medical issues, where the patient had an established diagnosis. In these cases, mutual trust remained present in video consultations. Better access for the patients and fewer cancellations, especially for psychiatrists, were highlighted as benefits. IT problems were reported as obstacles hindering optimal use of video consultation. CONCLUSION: The political aspiration to digitization in healthcare systems should be rooted in professionals' and patients' perceptions and experiences with video consultation which emphasize that it is not a standard tool for all consultations.

Preparing for success in final summative medical specialist examinations: The case for RACE.

BACKGROUND: Failure rates on medical specialist final summative examinations in Australia are high, regardless of speciality. Examination failure can have detrimental psycho-social, financial and job security effects on the trainee, while delays in completion of training adversely impacts workforce growth and health outcomes for the community. The study aimed to explore the preparation factors that contribute to ophthalmology trainee success in their final summative examination. METHODS: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 29 participants via telephone or Zoom with ophthalmology trainees and Fellows. To be eligible, interviewees had to have sat the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists Advanced Clinical Examination (RACE) within the past five years or were providing supervision to trainees preparing for RACE. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Examination success was underpinned by six themes relating to preparation: (i) 'Those who fail to plan, plan to fail', which related to development and adherence to a study plan; (ii) 'It takes a village' encompassed trainees establishing and activating personal and professional supports; (iii) 'Get to know your opponent', which encompassed developing an understanding of the examination construct, format and requirements; (iv) 'There is no substitute for hard work', which related to intensive study over a period of 12-18 months; (v) 'Keep pace with the herd', which referred to benchmarking preparation efforts and progress against peers; and (vi) 'Don't jump the gun', which related to ensuring readiness to sit. CONCLUSIONS: Maximising medical specialist examination pass rates is in the best interest of trainees, training Colleges, health care systems and communities. Recognising and facilitating preparation approaches that foster success in final summative examinations are the collective responsibility of trainees, specialist training Colleges, training networks and health systems. Trainees need to plan for examination success, be self-determined to commit to intensive study over an extended time period and be realistic about their readiness to sit.

The inter-prefectural regional disparity of healthcare resources and representative surgical procedures in orthopaedics and general surgery: a nationwide study in Japan during 2015-2019.

BACKGROUND: Few reports have examined the localized regional disparity in representative surgical procedures in orthopaedics and general surgery globally. This study aimed to clarify the inter-prefectural regional disparity and relationships between healthcare resources and representative surgical procedures using a nationwide database in Japan. METHODS: The number of medical specialists in orthopaedics, general surgery, and anaesthesiology, as well as the number of hospitals, and the incidence of representative surgical procedures in orthopaedics and general surgery were evaluated annually per 100,000 inhabitants/people by prefecture in Japan during 2015-2019. Medium-sized regional disparities were evaluated using the Gini coefficient. Correlation coefficients were calculated for the defined variables and ageing rate. We also compared the urban and rural regional disparities in all study variables. RESULTS: The annual average number/incidence and Gini coefficients were 110.6 and 0.11 for femur fracture surgery, 106.3 and 0.09 for cholecystectomy, 14.2 and 0.11 for orthopaedic surgeon specialists, 17.6 and 0.09 for general surgeon specialists, 5.9 and 0.13 for anaesthesiology specialists, and 8.1 and 0.21 for hospitals, respectively. The correlation coefficients by the incidence of femur fracture surgery were 0.74 for orthopaedic surgeon specialists (p < 0.001), 0.63 for hospitals (p < 0.001), and 0.62 for the ageing rate (p < 0.001); those by the incidence of cholecystectomy were 0.60 for general surgeon specialists (p < 0.001) and 0.59 for hospitals (p < 0.001). The number/incidence of orthopaedic surgeon specialists, hospitals, femur fracture surgery, and cholecystectomy, as well as the ageing rate, were significantly higher in rural prefectures than in urban prefectures (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Inter-prefectural regional disparity was small, although certain items were unevenly distributed in the rural prefectures, which is contrary to our expectations. Higher prevalence was recognised in rural prefectures due to the higher ageing rate; however, supply and demand are balanced. This study provides basic data for healthcare policy development in a medium-sized community. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

[Organization of further education in general and visceral surgery in a specialized hospital]. / Organisation der Weiterbildung in Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie in einer Schwerpunktklinik.

BACKGROUND: The newly implemented further education regulations of the Medical Association of the Federal States leads to changes in for residents in training as well as for licensed trainers. OBJECTIVE: The aim is the illustration of the effect on the residency of general and visceral surgery as well as the additional training for specialized visceral surgery from the perspective of a specialized center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Comparison of the (model) further education regulations 2018 of the Medical Association of the Federal States with the further education regulations 2004 exemplified by the Bavarian Federal Chamber of Physicians. RESULTS: The documentation effort for the continuous acquisition of competences is clearly increased and also the required reference numbers especially for diagnostic skills in the course of the specialist training in visceral surgery as well as the surgical skills for acquisition of the additional designation of specialized visceral surgery. The designation of medical specialist for general surgery was retained. CONCLUSION: Whether the changes due to the new further education regulations, such as increased documentation effort and the rotation of residents in training that is necessary in most hospitals without resource compensation, will lead to an improvement of specialist training and attraction of the profession in the setting of a specialized center remains to be elucidated.

Beyond the 'big smoke': Enabling supervision of ophthalmology trainees in regional, rural and remote Australia.

OBJECTIVE: Expansion of opportunities for ophthalmology training beyond the 'big smoke' is anticipated to support the future distribution of ophthalmologists in regional, rural and remote areas of Australia. However, little is known about what enables supervision outside of metropolitan tertiary hospital settings that would contribute to positive training experiences for specialist medical trainees and encourage them to leave the 'big smoke' once qualified. The aim of this study was therefore to explore the perceived enablers of ophthalmology trainee supervision in regional, rural and remote health settings across Australia. SETTING: Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Ophthalmologists working in regional, rural or remote health settings with experience and/or interest in supervising ophthalmology trainees (n = 16). DESIGN: Qualitative design involving semistructured interviews. RESULTS: Seven key enablers of ophthalmology trainee supervision in regional, rural and remote health settings were identified: adequate physical infrastructure, resources and funding to host a trainee; availability of online curriculum and teaching resources so as to ensure equity of training opportunities; pre-established training posts, driven by supervision 'champions'; a critical mass of ophthalmologists to help share the supervisory load; relationships and support between training posts, the training network and the Specialist Medical College; alignment of trainee competence and attitude with the needs of the training setting; and the recognition of reciprocal benefits for supervisors through supporting trainees, including workforce support and renewal. CONCLUSION: With training experiences beyond the 'big smoke' anticipated to influence future ophthalmology workforce distribution, implementation of enablers of trainee supervision should occur in regional, rural and remote health settings wherever possible.

[With structure to successful further education : Presentation of curriculum, checklists and compendium for career entrants]. / Mit Struktur zur erfolgreichen Weiterbildung : Vorstellung von Curriculum, Checklisten und Berufseinsteigerheft.

The further training to a medical specialist in orthopedics and trauma surgery is in a state of continuous development. This is underlined by numerous amendments from previous and coming years, including recently the implementation of the eLogbook, which is presently being implemented nationwide by the individual State Chambers of Physicians; however, in addition to the legally regulated conditions of the further education regulations the focus on the quality of the content of further training should not be neglected. This could be achieved by a structural approach. As the Young Forum for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery (JFOU) we would like to promote the exchange of ideas and policy engagement and directly contribute to the topic of further training in orthopedics and trauma surgery by facilitating a successful further training in numerous projects. This article presents the following projects on the topic of further training: checklists on diverse topics which are relevant for the clinical routine and further training, a comprehensive compendium for career entrants to facilitate the start of the career on the threshold from studying to routine daily work, a guide on further training for structured training even during the period of training for medical specialists and beyond, interactive spreadsheets for the progress in fulfilling the required benchmarks and a structured curriculum for further training in the medical specialist examination for orthopedics and trauma surgery in cooperation with Thieme eREF. Additionally, further projects on the topics of mentoring and specialization in orthopedics and trauma surgery can be found on our platform.

[How many patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases have the technical prerequisites for video consultations and are also willing to use this to carry out visits by medical specialist visits?] / Wie viele Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen haben die technischen Voraussetzungen für Videosprechstunden und sind bereit, fachärztliche Visiten so durchzuführen?

BACKGROUND: The currently disseminating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic and limited capacities in outpatient rheumatological care, pose questions about possible alternatives to clinical visits, also in view of the digital revolution. It is unclear whether and to what extent patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases are willing and in a position to deal with the new media, such as video consultation. METHODS: In the middle of the pandemic in May 2020 outpatients were surveyed using a standardized questionnaire in order to document their possibilities and willingness to participate in a video consultation. The treating physicians were asked whether carrying out a video consultation was considered to be a possible and meaningful option. RESULTS: Overall, 232 patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases were surveyed (64.7% female, average age 54.0 ± 15.2 years), seropositive (n = 58) and seronegative (n = 51) rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA, n = 77) including axial SpA (axSpA) and psoriatic arthropathy (PsA) as well as collagenosis and vasculitis (CoV, n = 46). The mean duration of disease was 5.5 ± 8.2 years, whereby in 75 patients (32.3%) it was the first diagnosis. The mean disease activity (0-10, subjective patient self-estimation) was 4.7 ± 2.5. Overall, 176 patients were basically aware of the possibility to carry out video consultations (75.9%) and 166 considered that they were technically capable to participate (71.6%) but only 131 were principally willing to participate (56.5%). Logistic regression analyses showed that the willingness to participate in video consultations decreased with increasing age (ß = 0.28, p = 0.01). According to the medical estimation video consultations were thought to be principally possible for 161 patients for technical reasons (69.4%) and for 127 for medical reasons (54.7%); however, a video consultation within the framework of treatment was only considered to be meaningful by the physician for 76 patients (32.8%). CONCLUSION: Not all patients can or want to participate in video consultations and the willingness declines with increasing age. The estimation of the meaningfulness of video consultations by physicians was also limited to approximately one third of the patients surveyed. This must be taken into consideration for the future planning of video consultations.

Benefits and challenges to ophthalmology training via the Specialist Training Program.

INTRODUCTION: The Specialist Training Program (STP) is a commonwealth funding initiative to support specialist medical training positions in regional, rural and remote areas, and in private settings. The program helps to improve the skills and distribution of the specialist medical workforce by providing trainees experience of a broader range of healthcare settings. OBJECTIVE: To examine the benefits and challenges of ophthalmology training delivered by the STP in regional, rural, remote, and/or private settings across Australia. DESIGN: Qualitative design involving semi-structured in-depth interviews with thirty-two participants experienced in the delivery of ophthalmology training at STP posts including ophthalmology trainees (n = 8), STP supervisors and clinical tutors (n = 16), and other stakeholders (n = 8). FINDINGS: Training delivered at STP posts was reportedly beneficial for ophthalmology trainees, their supervisors and the broader community given it enabled exposure to regional, rural, remote and private settings, access to unique learning opportunities, provided workforce support and renewal, and affordable ophthalmic care. However, all participants also reported challenges including difficulties achieving work/life balance, unmet training expectations, a lack of professional support, and financial and administrative burden. Malalignment between trainee preferences for STP posts, low STP literacy and limited regional, rural and remote training experiences were also seen as missed opportunities to foster future rural ophthalmic workforce development. DISCUSSION: The STP improves access to ophthalmic care in underserved populations while enabling valuable rural and/or private practice exposure for medical specialist trainees and workforce support for supervising ophthalmologists. CONCLUSION: Efforts are needed to improve the quality of training experiences provided at STP posts and post sustainability. Although research is needed to investigate the longer-term benefits of the STP to rural and/or private workforce recruitment and retention, RANZCO should develop further regional, rural and remote STP posts to help realise future rural practice intention amongst ophthalmology trainees.

Facilitating and Inhibiting Factors of Clinical Knowledge Sharing among Medical Specialists in University Hospitals.

Background: Clinical knowledge sharing (CKS) is one of the key points of knowledge management in the field of health and significantly increases the quality of care and patient safety. It also provides the achievement of an efficient system in hospitals and educational and treatment centers involved in clinical processes in order to make the best clinical decisions. The purpose of this research is to identify the factors that facilitate and inhibit CKS among medical specialists in the educational-treatment hospitals in Iran. Methods: This was an applied qualitative study with the conventional content analysis method conducted in 2022. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview. The participants were 13 medical specialists and sub-specialists working in educational-treatment hospitals of the country, who were selected by purposeful and snowball sampling. The method of data analysis was based on Graneheim and Lundman's five-step method, which was followed by codes, sub-categories, main categories, and classifications. Results: After conducting the interviews and assessing their content, finally, 193 codes were extracted, which were identified in two general classification of facilitating and inhibiting factors with 92 and 101 concepts, respectively. Facilitating factors in the three main categories of "education in the context of culture, society and university", "planning and implementation management", and "behavioral-motivational factors" and inhibiting factors in the four main categories of "infrastructural, policy-making and cultural challenges", "technological and scientific infrastructural challenges", "personality-behavioral challenges", and "financial and non-financial motivations" were classified. Conclusions: The participants of the research pointed out the effective role of CKS in keeping them up-to-date in the use of diagnostic, therapeutic, and even drug prescribing methods. According to their belief, knowledge sharing (KS) in the clinical setting will reduce diagnostic errors and cause the primordial prevention of diseases as well as increase the knowledge and awareness of the society members.

Current practices, needs, and expectations of discussing work with a medical specialist from a patient's perspective: a qualitative study.

PURPOSE: Attention to paid work in clinical health care-clinical work-integrating care (CWIC)-might be beneficial for patients of working age. However, the perceptions and expectations of patients about CWIC are unknown. The aim of this study was to develop an understanding of current practices, needs, and expectations among patients for discussing work with a medical specialist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative study was undertaken involving patients with diverse medical conditions (n = 33). Eight online synchronous focus groups were held. A thematic analysis was then performed. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data: (1) the process of becoming a patient while wanting to work again, (2) different needs for different patients, (3) patients' expectations of CWIC. We identified three different overarching categories of work-concerns: (a) the impact of work on disease, (b) the impact of disease or treatment on work ability, and (c) concerns when work ability remained decreased. For each category of concerns, patients expected medical specialists to perform differing roles. CONCLUSIONS: Patients indicated that they need support for work-related concerns from their medical specialists and/or other professionals. Currently, not all work concerns received the requested attention, leaving a portion of the patients with unmet needs regarding CWIC.

Patients have a wide range of questions regarding work and health, which they want to discuss with their medical specialistIn current clinical practice, not all work concerns get the requested attention, leaving some patients with unmet needsCooperation with different health care professionals, including rehabilitation occupational health care, might aid in supporting patients with their work-related questions.

[SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS OF INSTITUTIONS FOR ASSESSING THE QUALIFICATION OF MEDICAL SPECIALISTS].

Violation of the interconnected system of institutions for assessing the qualifications of medical specialists can be associated with two main circumstances. The first circumstance is the emergence of new institutions with duplicate tasks and organizational forms, and the second is the withdrawal from the system of an institution that performs the necessary system function. Two relatively new institutions, namely the independent assessment of qualifications (IAQ) and certification for the title of «Moscow Doctor¼, are considered from the point of view of these circumstances. The paper reveals that there is a convergence of the rules of the Institute of accreditation with the Institution of IAQ of qualifications, which can result in significant duplication of their activities. Therefore, it is necessary to resolve the issue of its possible unification with the Institution of accreditation while the IAQ is at the experimental stage and has not been put into practice. A certain similarity of the principles of activity can be traced in such institutions as certification for the qualification category and certification for the title of «Moscow doctor¼. Both of these institutions identify and rank the qualifications of specialists exceeding the basic level. The fundamental innovation of certification for the status of «Moscow Doctor¼ is that this institution actually introduces a qualification category that is higher than the current highest category. At the same time, this institution shows the importance of the institution of certification for a category whose existence is being questioned.

Gender and age concordance between patient and GP: an observational study on associations with referral behaviour.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate referral from primary to secondary care is essential for maintaining a healthcare system that is accessible and cost-effective. Social concordance can affect the doctor-patient interaction and possibly also referral behaviour. AIM: To investigate the association of gender concordance and age concordance on referral rates in primary care in The Netherlands. DESIGN & SETTING: Electronic health records data (n = 24 841) were used from 65 GPs in The Netherlands, containing referral information, which was combined with demographics of GPs and patients to investigate factors associated with referral likelihood. METHOD: Health records covered 16 different symptoms and diagnoses, categorised as 'gender sensitive', 'age sensitive', 'both age and gender sensitive', or 'neutral' based on Delphi consensus. Multi-level logistic regressions were performed to calculate the associations of gender and age concordance with referral status. RESULTS: Overall, 16.8% of patients were referred to a medical specialist. The female-male dyad (GP-patient) was associated with a higher referral likelihood (odds ratio [OR] 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02 to 1.27; P = 0.02) compared with the female-female dyad. Gender discordance was associated with a higher referral likelihood regarding consultations involving 'gender-sensitive' symptoms and diagnoses (OR 1.21; CI = 1.02 to 1.44; P = 0.03), and in duo and group practices (OR 1.08; 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.16; P = 0.05). Age concordance was not a significant predictor of referrals in the main model nor in subgroup analyses. CONCLUSION: Gender discordance was associated with a higher likelihood of referring. This study adds to the evidence that gender concordance affects decisions to refer, particularly with respect to symptoms and diagnoses that can be regarded as 'gender sensitive'.

Collaboration Between Physicians from Different Medical Specialties in Hospital Settings: A Systematic Review.

Health care today is characterized by an increasing number of patients with comorbidities for whom interphysician collaboration seems very important. We reviewed the literature to understand what factors affect interphysician collaboration, determine how interphysician collaboration is measured, and determine its effects. We systematically searched six major databases. Based on 63 articles, we identified five categories that influence interphysician collaboration: personal factors, professional factors, preconditions and tools, organizational elements, and contextual characteristics. We identified a diverse set of mostly unvalidated tools for measuring interphysician collaboration that focus on information being transferred and understood, frequency of interaction and tone of the relationship, and value judgements about quality or satisfaction. We found that interphysician collaboration increased clinical outcomes as well as patient and staff satisfaction, while error rates and length of stay were reduced. The results should, however, be interpreted with caution, as most of the studies provide a low level of evidence.

[Promoting young academics in anesthesiology: factors for an attractive internship]. / Nachwuchsförderung in der Anästhesiologie: attraktive Gestaltung der Famulatur.

BACKGROUND: Practical experiences in clinical traineeships can shape the later specialty choice of medical students. KEY QUESTION: The following study aimed to find factors in anesthesiological clinical traineeship that encourage students to specialize in the field. MATERIAL AND METHODS: As part of a nationwide online survey conducted by the working group for education of the German Association for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, DGOU), study participants (n = 479) answered questions about their minimum 4­week traineeship in anesthesiology. The information on items was analyzed in six content categories: 1) integration into the team, 2) acquisition of skills, 3) teachers, 4) quality of teaching, 5) structure of teaching and 6) satisfaction with the clinical internship. The respondents were subdivided into 4 groups by answering the question "Could you imagine an elective in anesthesiology during the final year (PJ)" with "Yes, I have made this decision after the clinical traineeship" (JdF, n = 212, 44%), "No I have decided against an elective during the final year after the traineeship" (NdF, n = 56, 12%), "Yes I have decided for an elective in anesthesiology before the internship" (JvF Yes: n = 144, 30%) and "No, I have decided against an elective in anesthesiology before the internship" (NvF: n = 67, 14%). Answers of the participants regarding the six content categories were compared between the four groups. RESULTS: The survey reached all medical faculties in Germany and included participants with an average age of 25.8 years and a balanced gender ratio. There were significant differences between satisfied and dissatisfied students in all four subgroups. Of the 479 respondents, 211 (44%) were already set regarding their decision of choosing anesthesiology as an elective during the final year before the clinical traineeship. Of the respondents 268 (56%) were influenced by the internship, 212 (44%) of them positively. In total, 81% of the trainees rated the internship as "satisfying". Students who were satisfied with the overall internship and who spoke in favor of the PJ elective in anesthesiology differed significantly from the other groups in the categories of team integration, skills acquisition, structure and quality of teaching. The teaching of practical skills and specialist knowledge as well as the integration into diagnostics and treatment planning promoted the recruitment of young people. DISCUSSION: The positively evaluated anesthesiology internship promotes later specialty choice, with quality and structure of the teaching affecting student satisfaction. Trainees who were attracted by anesthesiology gave better overall ratings and acquired more skills during the course of the internship. In order to win aspiring doctors for anesthesiology, the medical team has to integrate trainees well and support the acquisition of practical skills and specialist knowledge. In addition, didactics and practical relevance should be given high priority.

Acceptance and use of complementary and alternative medicine among medical specialists: a 15-year systematic review and data synthesis.

BACKGROUND: Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) has gained popularity among the general population, but its acceptance and use among medical specialists have been inconclusive. This systematic review aimed to identify relevant studies and synthesize survey data on the acceptance and use of CAM among medical specialists. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed and Scopus databases for the acceptance and use of CAM among medical specialists. Each article was assessed by two screeners. Only survey studies relevant to the acceptance and use of CAM among medical specialists were reviewed. The pooled prevalence estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analyses. This review followed both PRISMA and SWiM guidelines. RESULTS: Of 5628 articles published between 2002 and 2017, 25 fulfilled the selection criteria. Ten medical specialties were included: Internal Medicine (11 studies), Pediatrics (6 studies), Obstetrics and Gynecology (6 studies), Anesthesiology (4 studies), Surgery (3 studies), Family Medicine (3 studies), Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (3 studies), Psychiatry and Neurology (2 studies), Otolaryngology (1 study), and Neurological Surgery (1 study). The overall acceptance of CAM was 52% (95%CI, 42-62%). Family Medicine reported the highest acceptance, followed by Psychiatry and Neurology, Neurological Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Anesthesiology, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Internal Medicine, and Surgery. The overall use of CAM was 45% (95% CI, 37-54%). The highest use of CAM was by the Obstetrics and Gynecology, followed by Family Medicine, Psychiatry and Neurology, Pediatrics, Otolaryngology, Anesthesiology, Internal Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Surgery. Based on the studies, meta-regression showed no statistically significant difference across geographic regions, economic levels of the country, or sampling methods. CONCLUSION: Acceptance and use of CAM varied across medical specialists. CAM was accepted and used the most by Family Medicine but the least by Surgery. Findings from this systematic review could be useful for strategic harmonization of CAM and conventional medicine practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019125628.