Evaluation of Etest and MICRONAUT-AM Assay for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida auris: Underestimation of Fluconazole Resistance by MICRONAUT-AM and Overestimation of Amphotericin B Resistance by Etest.

Multidrug-resistant Candida auris has recently caused major outbreaks in healthcare facilities. Rapid and accurate antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) of C. auris is crucial for proper management of invasive infections. The Commercial Sensititre Yeast One and Vitek 2 methods underestimate or overestimate the resistance of C. auris to fluconazole and amphotericin B (AMB). This study evaluated the AST results of C. auris against fluconazole and AMB by gradient-MIC-strip (Etest) and broth microdilution-based MICRONAUT-AM-EUCAST (MCN-AM) assays. Clinical C. auris isolates (n = 121) identified by phenotypic and molecular methods were tested. Essential agreement (EA, ±1 two-fold dilution) between the two methods and categorical agreement (CA) based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC's) tentative resistance breakpoints were determined. Fluconazole resistance-associated mutations were detected by PCR-sequencing of ERG11. All isolates identified as C. auris belonged to South Asian clade I and contained the ERG11 Y132F or K143R mutation. The Etest-MCN-AM EA was poor (33%) for fluconazole and moderate (76%) for AMB. The CA for fluconazole was higher (94.2%, 7 discrepancies) than for AMB (91.7%, 10 discrepancies). Discrepancies were reduced when an MCN-AM upper-limit value of 4 µg/mL for fluconazole-susceptible C. auris and an Etest upper-limit value of 8 µg/mL for the wild type for AMB were used. Our data show that resistance to fluconazole was underestimated by MCN-AM, while resistance to AMB was overestimated by Etest when using the CDC's tentative resistance breakpoints of ≥32 µg/mL for fluconazole and ≥2 µg/mL for AMB. Method-specific resistance breakpoints should be devised for accurate AST of clinical C. auris isolates for proper patient management.

Comparative assessment of Sensititre YeastOne and Micronaut-AM EUCAST for antifungal susceptibility testing in candidaemia isolates.

PURPOSE: Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) is essential to ensure appropriate antifungal therapy in candidaemia. This study compared two commercial colorimetric broth microdilution tests: Sensititre YeastOne (SYO; Thermo Scientific) and Micronaut-AM EUCAST AFST (M-AM; Bruker) for the AFST of Candida spp. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 74 yeast strains, including C. albicans (n = 40) and non-albicans Candida species (NACS) (n = 34), were obtained from blood cultures of patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Belgium from 2017 to 2022. AFST by SYO and by M-AM were performed according to the manufacturers' protocols and interpreted using CLSI and EUCAST guidelines, respectively. Essential and categorical agreements (EA and CA), very major, major and minor discrepancies were calculated for amphotericin B, echinocandins and azoles considering SYO as the reference method. RESULTS: In total, 441 and 392 isolate-antifungal results were evaluable for EA and CA, respectively. SYO and M-AM, showed a high level of concordance for C. albicans strains, with an EA and CA ≥90 % for all tested antifungals. However, we noted significant discordances for NACS, the lowest EA were observed with micafungin (50 %) and voriconazole (58.8 %). These discrepancies were likely due to differences in the raw MIC values obtained by the two methods and the different interpretation breakpoints used by CLSI and EUCAST. CONCLUSION: Our study showed excellent agreement between SYO and M-AM for AFST of C. albicans, while the equivalency was lower for NACS. AFST method should be carefully selected, considering the results might impact the choice of antifungals for non-albicans candidaemia.

Comparison of the Micronaut-AM System and the EUCAST Broth Microdilution Reference Method for MIC Determination of Four Antifungals against Aspergillus fumigatus.

The Antifungal Susceptibility Testing method of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST-AFST) is a reference technique for the determination of the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of antifungals for Aspergillus fumigatus. However, it is time-consuming and requires expertise. Micronaut-AM (M-AM) is a fast, simple, time-saving, and ready-to-use new colorimetric method using an indicator (resazurin) to facilitate the visual reading. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the performance of the M-AM system and compare it with the EUCAST broth microdilution reference method to determine the susceptibility of 77 A. fumigatus clinical strains to amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole. Overall, the essential agreements within ±2 dilutions were 100%, 62%, 58%, and 30% and the categorical agreements were 100%, 97%, 91%, and 87% for amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole, respectively. No categorical discrepancy was found for amphotericin B, but several categorical discordances were observed with azole antifungals. However, only 2 of the 16 azole-resistant strains confirmed by the cyp51A sequencing would have been misclassified by M-AM. The use of M-AM is probably suitable for the determination of the MICs of amphotericin B, but further evaluations are needed to confirm its usefulness for the determination of the MICs of azoles for A. fumigatus.

How Yeast Antifungal Resistance Gene Analysis Is Essential to Validate Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Systems.

Objectives: The antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) of yeast pathogen alerts clinicians about the potential emergence of resistance. In this study, we compared two commercial microdilution AFST methods: Sensititre YeastOne read visually (YO) and MICRONAUT-AM read visually (MN) or spectrophotometrically (MNV), interpreted with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing criteria, respectively. Methods: Overall, 97 strains from 19 yeast species were measured for nine antifungal drugs including a total of 873 observations. First, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was compared between YO and MNV, and between MNV and MN, either directly or by assigning them to five susceptibility categories. Those categories were based on the number of MIC dilutions around the breakpoint or epidemiological cut-off reference values (ECOFFs or ECVs). Second, YO and MNV methods were evaluated for their ability to detect the elevation of MICs due to mutation in antifungal resistance genes, thanks to pairs or triplets of isogenic strains isolated from a single patient along a treatment previously analyzed for antifungal resistance gene mutations. Reproducibility measurement was evaluated, thanks to three quality control (QC) strains. Results: YO and MNV direct MIC comparisons obtained a global agreement of 67%. Performing susceptibility category comparisons, only 22% and 49% of the MICs could be assigned to categories using breakpoints and ECOFFs/ECVs, respectively, and 40% could not be assigned due to the lack of criteria in both consortia. The YO and MN susceptibility categories gave accuracies as low as 50%, revealing the difficulty to implement this method of comparison. In contrast, using the antifungal resistance gene sequences as a gold standard, we demonstrated that both methods (YO and MN) were equally able to detect the acquisition of resistance in the Candida strains, even if MN showed a global lower MIC elevation than YO. Finally, no major differences in reproducibility were observed between the three AFST methods. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the valuable use of both commercial microdilution AFST methods to detect antifungal resistance due to point mutations in antifungal resistance genes. We highlighted the difficulty to conduct conclusive analyses without antifungal gene sequence data as a gold standard. Indeed, MIC comparisons taking into account the consortia criteria of interpretation remain difficult even after the effort of harmonization.

Comparison of Two Commercial Colorimetric Broth Microdilution Tests for Candida Susceptibility Testing: Sensititre YeastOne versus MICRONAUT-AM.

Two colorimetric broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests were compared, Sensititre YeastOne and MICRONAUT-AM for nine antifungal agents. One hundred clinical Candida isolates were tested, representing a realistic population for susceptibility testing in daily practice. The reproducibility characteristics were comparable. Only for fluconazole, caspofungin, 5-flucytosine and amphotericin B, an essential agreement of ≥90% could be demonstrated. Sensititre minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were systematically higher than MICRONAUT MICs for all antifungals, except for itraconazole. CLSI clinical breakpoints (CBPs) and epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs) were used for Sensititre MICs while for MICRONAUT the EUCAST CBPs and ECVs were used. Only fluconazole, micafungin, and amphotericin B had a categorical agreement of ≥90%. For fluconazole, micafungin, and amphotericin B the susceptibility proportions were comparable. Susceptibility proportion of posaconazole and voriconazole was higher using the MICRONAUT system. For itraconazole and anidulafungin, the susceptibility proportion was higher using Sensititre. It was not possible to determine the true MIC values or the correctness of a S/I/R result since both commercial systems were validated against a different reference method. These findings show that there is a significant variability in susceptibility pattern and consequently on use of antifungals in daily practice, depending on the choice of commercial system.