Role of ursolic acid in preventing gastrointestinal cancer: recent trends and future perspectives.

Gastrointestinal malignancies are one of the major worldwide health concerns. In the present review, we have assessed the plausible therapeutic implication of Ursolic Acid (UA) against gastrointestinal cancer. By modulating several signaling pathways critical in cancer development, UA could offer anti-inflammatory, anti-proliferative, and anti-metastatic properties. However, being of low oral bioavailability and poor permeability, its clinical value is restricted. To deliver and protect the drug, liposomes and polymer micelles are two UA nanoformulations that can effectively increase medicine stability. The use of UA for treating cancers is safe and appropriate with low toxicity characteristics and a predictable pharmacokinetic profile. Although the bioavailability of UA is limited, its nanoformulations could emerge as an alternative to enhance its efficacy in treating GI cancers. Further optimization and validation in the clinical trials are necessary. The combination of molecular profiling with nanoparticle-based drug delivery technologies holds the potential for bringing UA to maximum efficacy, looking for good prospects with GI cancer treatment.

[Molecular tumor boards in uro-oncology-prostate cancer]. / Molekulare Tumorboards in der Uroonkologie ­ Prostatakarzinom.

The rapid development of molecular medicine has opened up new perspectives for the diagnosis and treatment of urological tumors. Urology faces the challenge of effectively treating advanced cancer, especially in view of the genetic diversity of urological tumors. The molecular tumor board offers an innovative approach to identify targeted therapy options based on the individual genetic signatures of tumor cells or tumor microenvironment-based treatment options. In this article, the concept of the molecular tumor board in urology is presented using the example of prostate cancer. We discuss the principles, applications, and future prospects of this promising approach.

Harnessing exosomes as cancer biomarkers in clinical oncology.

Exosomes are extracellular vesicles well known for facilitating cell-to-cell communication by distributing essential macromolecules like proteins, DNA, mRNA, lipids, and miRNA. These vesicles are abundant in fluids distributed throughout the body, including urine, blood, saliva, and even bile. They are important diagnostic tools for breast, lung, gastrointestinal cancers, etc. However, their application as cancer biomarkers has not yet been implemented in most parts of the world. In this review, we discuss how OMICs profiling of exosomes can be practiced by substituting traditional imaging or biopsy methods for cancer detection. Previous methods like extensive imaging and biopsy used for screening were expensive, mostly invasive, and could not easily provide early detection for various types of cancer. Exosomal biomarkers can be utilized for routine screening by simply collecting body fluids from the individual. We anticipate that the use of exosomes will be brought to light by the success of clinical trials investigating their potential to enhance cancer detection and treatment in the upcoming years.

Somatic Mutation Profile as a Predictor of Treatment Response and Survival in Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Treated with FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine Nab-Paclitaxel.

(1) Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has low survival rates despite treatment advancements. Aim: This study aims to show how molecular profiling could possibly guide personalized treatment strategies, which may help improve survival outcomes in patients with PDAC. (2) Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 142 PDAC patients from a single academic center was conducted. Patients underwent chemotherapy and next-generation sequencing for molecular profiling. Key oncogenic pathways were identified using the Reactome pathway database. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox Proportional Hazards Regression. (3) Results: Patients mainly received FOLFIRINOX (n = 62) or gemcitabine nab-paclitaxel (n = 62) as initial chemotherapy. The median OS was 13.6 months. Longer median OS was noted in patients with NOTCH (15 vs. 12.3 months, p = 0.007) and KIT pathway mutations (21.3 vs. 12.12 months, p = 0.04). Combinatorial pathway analysis indicated potential synergistic effects on survival. In the PFS, PI3K pathway (6.6 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.03) and KIT pathway (10.3 vs. 6.2 months, p = 0.03) mutations correlated with improved PFS within the gemcitabine nab-paclitaxel subgroup. (4) Conclusions: Molecular profiling could play a role in PDAC for predicting outcomes and responses to therapies like FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine nab-paclitaxel. Integrating genomic data into clinical decision-making can benefit PDAC treatment, though further validation is needed to fully utilize precision oncology in PDAC management.

Case report: Fast disease progression during adjuvant therapy with anti-PD-1 in stage III melanoma patients.

Background: Stage III surgically resected melanoma is a disease at high risk of recurrence. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the target therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors significantly changed the outcome of patients with metastatic melanoma and several studies have also shown their benefit in the adjuvant setting for the delay of recurrence in stage III melanoma patients. Hyperprogression disease was observed as a possible adverse response to immunotherapy in the metastatic setting, suggesting that some patients could face additional risk of progression with ICIs, although no consensus was found for the correct definition of this event. Case presentation: We describe here two cases of rapid multiorgan metastatization during adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with stage III resected melanoma. Even though it would be not accurate to define this syndrome as hyperprogression because of apparent absence of the initial disease in the adjuvant setting, we observed in these two cases the same very rapid progression after first administration of adjuvant ICIs that resulted in death of patients within two months from the starting of treatment. Both patients had NRAS mutated melanoma. Conclusion: There is an urgent need for a better understanding of the causes of these fatal outcomes and for the identification of biomarkers that would allow to select the patients before offering them an adjuvant treatment, reducing the risk of hyperprogression. From these cases, we suggest that it could be useful a particular attention in proposing ICI adjuvant treatment based on the molecular profile.

Single-center analysis of a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma evaluated by NGS: molecular landscape and efficacy of targeted therapies.

PURPOSE: To describe the molecular profile of a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and to evaluate the benefit of next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels in guiding therapy in patients with mUC and the outcomes of DNA-matched treatments recommended by a multidisciplinary molecular tumor board (MMTB). METHODS: This was a single-center analysis of a real-world cohort of adult patients with mUC included in an ongoing trial that aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of NGS for solid tumors. Genomic analysis was performed for each patient, most of them using the Ion Torrent Oncomine Focus Assay. Genomic results were discussed during MMTB meetings. RESULTS: We included 43 patients with mUC treated with platinum-based combinations and immunotherapy. Twenty-five patients (58.1%; 95% CI 43.4-72.9) had at least one tumor pathogenic alteration. The MMTB classified 16 (48.5%) of the 33 tumor pathogenic alterations found in our real-world cohort of mUC patients as ESCAT I, which is the maximum grade of actionability. After excluding patients who were not candidates for targeted therapies, the MMTB provided guidance on matched therapy for seven patients. Among these patients, three achieved a partial response for an overall response rate of 42.9%, a median progression-free survival of 7.3 months (95% CI 6.7-7.9) and a median overall survival of 10.9 months (95% CI 2.4-19.5). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that all patients with mUC undergo NGS at diagnosis given the high percentage of patients with pathogenic alterations in our real-world cohort and the efficacy data of patients treated with targeted therapies.

Is local ablative stereotactic radiation therapy a valuable rescue strategy for time on drug in patients enrolled in phase I trials?

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced tumours enrolled in phase I trials display strong treatment expectations and few therapeutic alternatives. When oligo-acquired resistance (≤3 lesions of disease progression; OAR) occurs, local ablative stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) could allow disease control and continuing the experimental systemic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients enrolled in phase I trials evaluating systemic treatments, who experienced OAR while on the phase I systemic therapy and subsequently received SRT between 01/2014-04/2023 were retrospectively analysed. PFS1 (trial entry to OAR), PFS2 (SRT to first subsequent relapse), time to next systemic treatment (TTNT), and OS were assessed. First subsequent patterns of relapse after SRT were distinguished as OAR2, which could be locally rechallenged, or systemic acquired resistance (>3 lesions of disease progression; SAR). When available, correlations between molecular profile and pathway enrichments of OAR and SAR were explored. RESULTS: Forty-two patients with 52 oligoprogressive lesions were analysed. The median follow-up was 24 months. SRT allowed a median PFS2 of 7.1 months and a median TTNT of 12.8 months. PFS2 included 49% OAR2 and 51% SAR. Median time to first subsequent relapse (9.6 months vs 3.5 months, P=0.014) and TTNT (22.4 months vs 7.6 months, P<0.001) were longer for OAR2 as compared to SAR. No severe toxicities were reported. A PFS1 <6 months and de novo oligoprogressive lesions associated with the presence of SAR. More diverse enriched gene pathways were observed for SAR as compared to OAR2. CONCLUSION: In patients enrolled in phase I trials, OAR managed with SRT may increase time on investigational systemic treatments. Predictive factors reflecting tumour aggressiveness and clonal heterogeneity could help deciphering OAR2 from SAR and maximize SRT output in the oligoprogressive setting.

Advances in the Treatment of Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGGs) often result in significant long-term morbidities despite high overall survival rates. This review aims to consolidate the current understanding of pLGG biology and molecular features and provide an overview of current and emerging treatment strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: Surgical resection remains a primary treatment modality, supplemented by chemotherapy and radiotherapy in specific cases. However, recent advances have elucidated the molecular underpinnings of pLGGs, revealing key genetic abnormalities such as BRAF fusions and mutations and the involvement of the RAS/MAPK and mTOR pathways. Novel targeted therapies, including MEK, BRAF and pan-RAF inhibitors, have shown promise in clinical trials, demonstrating significant efficacy and manageable toxicity. Understanding of pLGGs has significantly improved, leading to more personalized treatment approaches. Targeted therapies have emerged as effective alternatives, potentially reducing long-term toxicities. Future research should focus on optimizing therapy sequences, understanding long-term impacts, and ensuring global accessibility to advanced treatments.

The KRAS G12D mutation increases the risk of unresectable recurrence of resectable colorectal liver-only metastasis.

PURPOSE: Unresectable recurrence is a critical predictor of outcomes for colorectal cancer patients. We attempted to identify the prognostic factors, especially for unresectable recurrence-free survival (URFS) as a new endpoint, in patients with resectable colorectal liver-only metastasis (CRLOM). METHODS: We investigated patients with resectable CRLOM, who underwent an R0 resection for both CRC and CRLOM between January, 2014 and March, 2019 at a single institution. The exclusion criteria were patients who received neoadjuvant treatment, the absence of data for genetic analyses, and the presence of multiple cancers, synchronous CRC, or familial adenomatous polyposis. The prognostic factors were examined retrospectively using data on pre-hepatectomy factors, including primary tumor molecular profiling results. RESULTS: We analyzed the data of 101 patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for CRLOM. Multivariate analysis revealed that KRAS G12D mutation-positivity (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.69; p < 0.01), RYR2 mutation-positivity (HR: 4.03; p < 0.01), and KRAS G12S mutation-positivity (HR: 3.96; p = 0.03), CA19-9 > 37 U/ml before hepatectomy (HR: 3.62; p < 0.01), and primary tumor pN2 stage (HR: 3.22; p = 0.03) were significant predictors of the URFS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show that specific KRAS and RYR2 mutations were associated with the URFS.

Germline susceptibility from broad genomic profiling of pediatric brain cancers.

Background: Identifying germline predisposition in CNS malignancies is of increasing clinical importance, as it contributes to diagnosis and prognosis, and determines aspects of treatment. The inclusion of germline testing has historically been limited due to challenges surrounding access to genetic counseling, complexity in acquiring a germline comparator specimen, concerns about the impact of findings, or cost considerations. These limitations were further defined by the breadth and scope of clinical testing to precisely identify complex variants as well as concerns regarding the clinical interpretation of variants including those of uncertain significance. Methods: In the course of conducting an IRB-approved protocol that performed genomic, transcriptomic and methylation-based characterization of pediatric CNS malignancies, we cataloged germline predisposition to cancer based on paired exome capture sequencing, coupled with computational analyses to identify variants in known cancer predisposition genes and interpret them relative to established clinical guidelines. Results: In certain cases, these findings refined diagnosis or prognosis or provided important information for treatment planning. Conclusions: We outline our aggregate findings on cancer predisposition within this cohort which identified 16% of individuals (27 of 168) harboring a variant predicting cancer susceptibility and contextualize the impact of these results in terms of treatment-related aspects of precision oncology.

Case report: Immunotherapy guided by molecular profiling of tumors: illustrative cases and literature review.

Predictive biomarkers are necessary for the identification of immunotherapy-responsive patients. Tumor mutation burden (TMB), as determined by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and PD-L1 expression, as evaluated by Immunohistochemistry (IHC), are the biomarkers most frequently employed in clinical practice. In addition, microsatellite instability (MSI) was the first biomarker to demonstrate immunotherapy efficacy irrespective of the type of tumor and possesses a high predictive value. However, its limited use across most tumor types limits its therapeutic potential. This report describes two cancer patients with positive TMB and PD-L1 expression. The molecular profile of the tumor indicated that the first patient was responsive to Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), while the second patient was resistant. These case studies demonstrate that tumor molecular analysis in combination with immunotherapy predictive biomarkers, such as PD-L1 expression and TMB, can enhance the prediction of response to ICI for specific patients. This methodology enables an individualized and improved approach to the treatment and management of the disease.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the latest on diagnosis, molecular profiling, and systemic treatments.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently the fourth leading cause of death in the United States and is expected to be ranked second in the next 10 years due to poor prognosis and a rising incidence. Distant metastatic PDAC is associated with the worst prognosis among the different phases of PDAC. The diagnostic options for PDAC are convenient and available for staging, tumor response evaluation, and management of resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. However, imaging is crucial in PDAC diagnosis, monitoring, resectability appraisal, and response evaluation. The advancement of medical technologies is evolving, hence the use of imaging in PDAC treatment options has grown as well as the utilization of ctDNA as a tumor marker. Treatment options for metastatic PDAC are minimal with the primary goal of therapy limited to symptom relief or palliation, especially in patients with low functional capacity at the point of diagnosis. Molecular profiling has shown promising potential solutions that would push the treatment boundaries for patients with PDAC. In this review, we will discuss the latest updates from evidence-based guidelines regarding diagnosis, therapy response evaluation, prognosis, and surveillance, as well as illustrating novel therapies that have been recently investigated for PDAC, in addition to discussing the molecular profiling advances in PDAC.

The impact of next-generation sequencing for diagnosis and disease understanding of myeloid malignancies.

INTRODUCTION: Defining the chromosomal and molecular changes associated with myeloid neoplasms (MNs) optimizes clinical care through improved diagnosis, prognosis, treatment planning, and patient monitoring. This review will concisely describe the techniques used to profile MNs clinically today, with descriptions of challenges and emerging approaches that may soon become standard-of-care. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the authors discuss molecular assessment of MNs using non-sequencing techniques, including conventional cytogenetic analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, chromosomal genomic microarray testing; as well as DNA- or RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays; and sequential monitoring via digital PCR or measurable residual disease assays. The authors explain why distinguishing somatic from germline alleles is critical for optimal management. Finally, they introduce emerging technologies, such as long-read, whole exome/genome, and single-cell sequencing, which are reserved for research purposes currently but will become clinical tests soon. EXPERT OPINION: The authors describe challenges to the adoption of comprehensive genomic tests for those in resource-constrained environments and for inclusion into clinical trials. In the future, all aspects of patient care will likely be influenced by the adaptation of artificial intelligence and mathematical modeling, fueled by rapid advances in telecommunications.

Insights Into the Emerging Entity of HER2-Low Breast Cancer.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer (BC) is a subtype of BC that has been recently recognized as a separate clinical entity with distinct clinical and molecular characteristics. It is defined by a low level of HER2 protein expression, which distinguishes it from other more aggressive BC subtypes. Early studies suggest that it may have a more favorable prognosis than HER2-positive BC, as it is less likely to spread to other parts of the body and may be more responsive to standard BC treatments such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormone therapy. Given the relative new emergence of HER2-low BC, there is still much to be learned about this subtype; ongoing research is focused on identifying the underlying genetic mutations that contribute to HER2-low BC as well as developing targeted therapies that can improve outcomes for patients with this disease. This review is aimed at summarizing the current clinical knowledge on HER2-low BC, with the aim of creating a better understanding of this entity and paving the way for potential interventions and a new standard of care.

Biomarkers in Cutaneous Keratinocyte Carcinomas.

Skin cancer is the most common cancer type in the USA, with over five million annually treated cases and one in five Americans predicted to develop the disease by the age of 70. Skin cancer can be classified as melanoma or non-melanoma (NMSC), the latter including basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Development of BCC and SCC is impacted by environmental, behavioral, and genetic risk factors and the incidence is on the rise, with the associated number of deaths surpassing those caused by melanoma, according to recent reports. Substantial morbidity is related to both BCC and SCC, including disfigurement, loss of function, and chronic pain, driving high treatment costs, and representing a heavy financial burden to patients and healthcare systems worldwide. Clinical presentations of BCC and SCC can be diverse, sometimes carrying considerable phenotypic similarities to benign lesions, and underscoring the need for the development of disease-specific biomarkers. Skin biomarker profiling plays an important role in deeper disease understanding, as well as in guiding clinical diagnosis and patient management, prompting the use of both invasive and non-invasive tools to evaluate specific biomarkers. In this work, we review the known and emerging biomarkers of BCC and SCC, with a focus on molecular and histologic biomarkers relevant for aspects of patient management, including prevention/risk assessments, tumor diagnosis, and therapy selection.

Molecular tumor board: molecularly adjusted therapy upon identification and functional validation of a novel ALK resistance mutation in a case of lung adenocarcinoma.

We report a case of a long-term surviving patient with EML4/ALK translocated non-small cell adenocarcinoma of the lung in UICC8 stage IVA. During recurrence under continuous crizotinib therapy, a hitherto insufficiently characterized missense mutation in the ALK gene (Arg1181His) was identified through targeted sequencing. The aforementioned EML4/ALK translocation could still be detected in this situation. Employing a 3D reconstruction of the ALK tertiary structure, considering its interaction with various ALK inhibitors at the molecular binding site, our analysis indicated the presence of a mutation associated with crizotinib resistance. To validate the biological relevance of this previously unknown mutation, we carried out an in vitro validation approach in cell culture in addition to the molecular diagnostics accompanied by the molecular tumor board. The tumor scenario was mimicked through retroviral transfection. Our comparative in vitro treatment regimen paired with the clinical trajectory of the patient, corroborated our initial clinical and biochemical suspicions. Our approach demonstrates preclinical, in silico, and clinical evidence of a novel crizotinib resistance mutation in ALK as well as sensitivity toward brigatinib and potentially lorlatinib. In future cases, this procedure represents an important contribution to functional diagnostics in the context of molecular tumor boards.

Current status of precision oncology in adult glioblastoma.

The concept of precision oncology, the application of targeted drugs based on comprehensive molecular profiling, has revolutionized treatment strategies in oncology. This review summarizes the current status of precision oncology in glioblastoma (GBM), the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults with a median survival below 2 years. Targeted treatments without prior target verification have consistently failed. Patients with BRAF V600E-mutated GBM benefit from BRAF/MEK-inhibition, whereas targeting EGFR alterations was unsuccessful due to poor tumor penetration, tumor cell heterogeneity, and pathway redundancies. Systematic screening for actionable molecular alterations resulted in low rates (< 10%) of targeted treatments. Efficacy was observed in one-third and currently appears to be limited to BRAF-, VEGFR-, and mTOR-directed treatments. Advancing precision oncology for GBM requires consideration of pathways instead of single alterations, new trial concepts enabling rapid and adaptive drug evaluation, a focus on drugs with sufficient bioavailability in the CNS, and the extension of target discovery and validation to the tumor microenvironment, tumor cell networks, and their interaction with immune cells and neurons.

Molecular Subtypes and the Role of TP53 in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Richter Syndrome.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common lymphoid malignancy and a heterogeneous entity comprised of several biologically distinct subtypes. Recently, novel genetic classifications of DLBCL have been resolved based on common mutational patterns indicative of distinct pathways of transformation. However, the complicated and costly nature of the novel classifiers has precluded their inclusion into routine practice. In view of this, the status of the TP53 gene, which is mutated or deleted in 20-30% of the cases, has emerged as an important prognostic factor for DLBCL patients, setting itself apart from other predictors. TP53 genetic lesions are particularly enriched in a genetic subtype of DLBCL that shares genomic features with Richter Syndrome, highlighting the possibility of a subset of DLBCL arising from the transformation of an occult chronic lymphocytic leukemia-like malignancy, such as monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. Patients with TP53-mutated DLBCL, including those with Richter Syndrome, have a particularly poor prognosis and display inferior responses to standard chemoimmunotherapy regimens. The data presented in this manuscript argue for the need for improved and more practical risk-stratification models for patients with DLBCL and show the potential for the use of TP53 mutational status for prognostication and, in prospect, treatment stratification in DLBCL.

Molecular Long-Term Analysis of the GMMG-HD4 Trial in Multiple Myeloma-Patterns of Association of Chromosomal Aberrations with Response and Proliferation Determining Survival in Selecting Treatments in View of Limited Resources in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Based on the lack of differences in progression-free and overall survival after a median follow-up of 93 months in our HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 trial (German part; n = 395) randomizing VAD induction (vincristin/adriamycin/dexamthasone)/tandem-transplantation/thalidomide-maintenance vs. PAD induction (bortezomib/adriamycin/dexamethasone)/tandem transplantation/bortezomib maintenance, we discern how chromosomal aberrations determine long-term prognosis by different patterns of association with proliferation and treatment-dependent response, whether responses achieved by different regimens are equal regarding prognosis, and whether subpopulations of patients could be defined as treatable without upfront "novel agents" in cases of limited resources, e.g., in low- or middle-income countries. Serum parameters and risk factors were assessed in 395 patients. CD138-purified plasma cells were subjected to fluorescence in situ hybridization (n = 354) and gene expression profiling (n = 204). We found chromosomal aberrations to be associated in four patterns with survival, proliferation, and response: deletion (del) del17p13, del8p21, del13q14, (gain) 1q21+, and translocation t(4;14) (all adverse) associate with higher proliferation. Of these, del17p is associated with an adverse response (pattern 1), and 1q21+, t(4;14), and del13q14 with a treatment-dependent better response (pattern 2). Hyperdiploidy associates with lower proliferation without impacting response or survival (pattern 3). Translocation t(11;14) has no association with survival but a treatment-dependent adverse response (pattern 4). Significantly fewer patients reach a near-complete response or better with "conventional" (VAD) vs. bortezomib-based treatment after induction or high-dose melphalan. These patients, however, show significantly better median progression-free and overall survival. Molecularly, patients responding to the two regimens differ in gene expression, indicating distinct biological properties of the responding myeloma cells. Patients with normal renal function (89.4%), low cytogenetic risk (72.5%), or low proliferation rate (37.9%) neither benefit in progression-free nor overall survival from bortezomib-based upfront treatment. We conclude that response level, the treatment by which it is achieved, and molecular background determine long-term prognosis. Chromosomal aberrations are associated in four patterns with proliferation and treatment-dependent responses. Associations with faster and deeper responses can be deceptive in the case of prognostically adverse aberrations 1q21+ and t(4;14). Far from advocating a return to "outdated" treatments, if resources do not permit state-of-the-art-treatment, normal renal function and/or molecular profiling identifies patient subpopulations doing well without upfront "novel agents".