Association between strenuous sports or other exercises and lung cancer risk: a mendelian randomization study.

Background: Studying the relationship between strenuous sports or other exercises (SSOE) and lung cancer risk remains underexplored. Traditional observational studies face challenges like confounders and inverse causation. However, Mendelian randomization (MR) provides a promising approach in epidemiology and genetics, using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate causal relationships. By leveraging MR, we have scrutinized the causal link between SSOE and lung cancer development. Methods: Twelve single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with SSOE, as identified in previously published genome-wide association studies, were utilized as instrumental variables in our investigation. Summary genetic data at the individual level were obtained from relevant studies and cancer consortia. The study encompassed a total of 11,348 cases and 15,861 controls. The statistical technique of inverse variance-weighting (IVW), commonly employed in meta-analyses and MR studies, was employed to assess the causal relationship between SSOE and lung cancer risk. Results: The MR risk analysis indicated a causal relationship between SSOE and the incidence of lung cancer, with evidence of a reduced risk for overall lung cancer [odds ratio (OR) =0.129; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.021-0.779; P=0.03], lung adenocarcinoma (OR =0.161; 95% CI: 0.012-2.102; P=0.16) and squamous cell lung cancer (OR =0.045; 95% CI: 0.003-0.677; P=0.03). The combined OR for lung cancer from SSOE (controlling for waist circumference and smoking status) was 0.054 (95% CI: 0.010-0.302, P<0.001). Conclusions: Our MR analysis findings indicate a potential correlation between SSOE and a protective effect against lung cancer development. Further investigation is imperative to uncover the precise mechanistic link between them.

C-Reactive Protein Levels and Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases: A Two-Sample Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.

Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are an indicator of inflammation, a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, this potential association in observational studies remains inconclusive. We performed a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study using publicly available GWAS summary statistics to evaluate the relationship between CRP and CVD. Instrumental variables (IVs) were carefully selected, and multiple approaches were used to make robust conclusions. Horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity were evaluated using the MR-Egger intercept and Cochran's Q-test. The strength of the IVs was determined using F-statistics. The causal effect of CRP on the risk of hypertensive heart disease (HHD) was statistically significant, but we did not observe a significant causal relationship between CRP and the risk of myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, heart failure, or atherosclerosis. Our primary analyses, after performing outlier correction using MR-PRESSO and the Multivariable MR method, revealed that IVs that increased CRP levels also increased the HHD risk. However, after excluding outlier IVs identified using PhenoScanner, the initial MR results were altered, but the sensitivity analyses remained congruent with the results from the primary analyses. We found no evidence of reverse causation between CVD and CRP. Our findings warrant updated MR studies to confirm the role of CRP as a clinical biomarker for HHD.

Detecting causal relationship between metabolic traits and osteoporosis using multivariable Mendelian randomization.

By adopting the extension approaches of Mendelian randomization, we successfully detected and prioritized the potential causal risk factors for BMD traits, which might provide us novel insights for treatment and intervention into bone-related complex traits and diseases. INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis (OP) is a common metabolic skeletal disease characterized by reduced bone mineral density (BMD). The identified SNPs for BMD can only explain approximately 10% of the variability, and very few causal factors have been identified so far. METHODS: The Mendelian randomization (MR) approach enables us to assess the potential causal effect of a risk factor on the outcome by using genetic IVs. By using extension methods of MR-multivariable MR (mvMR) and MR based on Bayesian model averaging (MR-BMA)-we intend to estimate the causal relationship between fifteen metabolic risk factors for BMD and try to prioritize the most potential causal risk factors for BMD. RESULTS: Our analysis identified three risk factors T2D, FG, and HCadjBMI for FN BMD; four risk factors FI, T2D, HCadjBMI, and WCadjBMI for FA BMD; and three risk factors FI, T2D, and HDL cholesterol for LS BMD, and all risk factors were causally associated with heel BMD except for triglycerides and WCadjBMI. Consistent with the mvMR results, MR-BMA confirmed those risk factors as top risk factors for each BMD trait individually. CONCLUSIONS: By combining MR approaches, we identified the potential causal risk factors for FN, FA, LS, and heel BMD individually and we also prioritized and ranked the potential causal risk factors for BMD, which might provide us novel insights for treatment and intervention into bone-related complex traits and diseases.

Detecting potential causal relationship between multiple risk factors and Alzheimer's disease using multivariable Mendelian randomization.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive brain disorder characterized by cognitive skills deterioration that affects many elderly individuals. The identified genetic loci for AD failed to explain the large variability in AD and very few causal factors have been identified so far. RESULTS: mvMR showed that increasing years of schooling (OR=0.674, 95%CI: 0.571-0.796, P=3.337E-06) and genetically elevated HDL cholesterol (OR ranging from 0.697 to 0.830, P=6.940E-10) were inversely associated with AD risk, genetically predicted total cholesterol (OR=1.300, 1.196 to 1.412; P=6.223E-10) and LDL cholesterol (OR=1.193, 1.097 to 1.296, P=3.564E-05) were associated with increasing AD risk. Genetically predicted FG was suggestively associated with increased AD risk. Furthermore, MR-BMA analysis also confirmed FG and years of schooling as two of the top five causal risk factors for AD. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings might provide us novel insights for treatment and intervention into the causal risk factors for AD or AD-related complex diseases. METHODS: By using extension methods of Mendelian randomization (MR)--multivariable MR (mvMR) and MR based on Bayesian model averaging (MR-BMA), we intend to estimate the potential causal relationship between nine risk factors and AD outcome and try to prioritize the most causal risk factors for AD.