IT-DEX and B cell depletion in a child with anti-GAD 65 autoimmune encephalitis presenting as NORSE: A case report.

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a devastating clinical condition that often leads to severe disability. Intrathecal dexamethasone (IT-DEX) has been reported to improve refractory status epilepticus. We present an 11-year-old female with anti-GAD 65 encephalitis presenting as NORSE who had minimal response to standard anti-seizure medications and first-line immunotherapies. The patient received 6 doses of IT-DEX in conjunction with rituximab which correlated with subsequent decreased neuroinflammation, reduced seizure burden and aided in weaning anesthetic infusions. Our case with literature review suggests IT-DEX may be utilized as an early intervention in those with refractory status epilepticus from various etiologies.

Identification of etiologies according to baseline clinical features of pediatric new-onset refractory status epilepticus in single center retrospective study.

PURPOSE: New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is defined as a state of prolonged seizure activity that does not improve despite the appropriate administration of medications, with underlying causes unknown after the initial diagnosis of status epilepticus. Because episodes of NORSE are accompanied by severe complications and a high risk of mortality, the prompt identification of the underlying cause is crucial for effective treatment and outcome prediction. This study assessed the relationship of NORSE etiologies with baseline clinical features in pediatric population. METHODS: Seventy-one pediatric patients, under 18 years of age at the initial diagnosis (4.50 ± 4.04, mean ± standard deviation), who experienced at least one episode of NORSE and underwent a comprehensive diagnostic evaluation between January 2005 and June 2020 at our center, were retrospectively selected. We reviewed clinical features at disease onset and long-term follow-up data. Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) was used to distinguish etiological clusters according to baseline clinical characteristics, and further analysis was performed based on underlying etiologies. RESULTS: Two distinct etiological groups-genetic and non-genetic-were identified based on the UMAP of clinical characteristics. Dravet syndrome (12/15, 80%) was more predominant in patients with a genetic diagnosis, whereas cryptogenic NORSE and encephalitis were prevalent in patients without a genetic diagnosis. The analysis of etiological categories revealed that age at the onset of status epilepticus (P=0.021) and progression to super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) (P=0.038) were independently associated with differences in etiologies. CONCLUSION: Several clinical features in patients with NORSE, including the age of onset and the development of SRSE, can help identify underlying causes, which necessitate prompt and adequate treatment.

Trends in management of patients with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) from 2016 to 2023: An interim analysis.

In response to the evolving treatment landscape for new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and the publication of consensus recommendations in 2022, we conducted a comparative analysis of NORSE management over time. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled by 32 centers, from July 2016 to August 2023, in the NORSE/FIRES biorepository at Yale. Immunotherapy was administered to 88% of patients after a median of 3 days, with 52% receiving second-line immunotherapy after a median of 12 days (anakinra 29%, rituximab 25%, and tocilizumab 19%). There was an increase in the use of second-line immunotherapies (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-1.8) and ketogenic diet (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3-2.6) over time. Specifically, patients from 2022 to 2023 more frequently received second-line immunotherapy (69% vs 40%; OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3-8.9)-particularly anakinra (50% vs 13%; OR = 6.5; 95% CI = 2.3-21.0), and the ketogenic diet (OR = 6.8; 95% CI = 2.5-20.1)-than those before 2022. Among the 27 patients who received anakinra and/or tocilizumab, earlier administration after status epilepticus onset correlated with a shorter duration of status epilepticus (ρ = .519, p = .005). Our findings indicate an evolution in NORSE management, emphasizing the increasing use of second-line immunotherapies and the ketogenic diet. Future research will clarify the impact of these treatments and their timing on patient outcomes.

Comparative analysis of patients with new onset refractory status epilepticus preceded by fever (febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome) versus without prior fever: An interim analysis.

Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a subset of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) that involves a febrile infection prior to the onset of the refractory status epilepticus. It is unclear whether FIRES and non-FIRES NORSE are distinct conditions. Here, we compare 34 patients with FIRES to 30 patients with non-FIRES NORSE for demographics, clinical features, neuroimaging, and outcomes. Because patients with FIRES were younger than patients with non-FIRES NORSE (median = 28 vs. 48 years old, p = .048) and more likely cryptogenic (odds ratio = 6.89), we next ran a regression analysis using age or etiology as a covariate. Respiratory and gastrointestinal prodromes occurred more frequently in FIRES patients, but no difference was found for non-infection-related prodromes. Status epilepticus subtype, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and magnetic resonance imaging findings, and outcomes were similar. However, FIRES cases were more frequently cryptogenic; had higher CSF interleukin 6, CSF macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1a), and serum chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) levels; and received more antiseizure medications and immunotherapy. After controlling for age or etiology, no differences were observed in presenting symptoms and signs or inflammatory biomarkers, suggesting that FIRES and non-FIRES NORSE are very similar conditions.

Long-term outcome in new onset refractory status epilepticus: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: New onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a neurologic emergency without an immediately identifiable cause. The complicated and long ICU stay of the patients can lead to perceiving a prolongation of therapies as futile. However, a recovery is possible even in severe cases. This retrospective study investigates ICU treatments, short- and long-term outcome and ethical decisions of a case series of patients with NORSE. METHODS: Overall, 283 adults were admitted with status epilepticus (SE) to the Neurocritical Care Unit of the University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, between 01.2010 and 12.2022. Of them, 25 had a NORSE. We collected demographic, clinical, therapeutic and outcome data. Descriptive statistics was performed. RESULTS: Most patients were female (68%), previously healthy (Charlson comorbidity index 1 [0-4]) and relatively young (54 ± 17 years). 96% presented with super-refractory SE. Despite extensive workup, the majority (68%) of cases remained cryptogenic. Most patients had a long and complicated ICU stay. The in-hospital mortality was 36% (n = 9). The mortality at last available follow-up was 56% (n = 14) on average 30 months after ICU admission. The cause of in-hospital death for 89% (n = 8) of the patients was the withholding/withdrawing of therapies. Medical staff except for one patient triggered the decision. The end of life (EOL) decision was taken 29 [12-51] days after the ICU admission. Death occurred on day 6 [1-8.5] after the decision was taken. The functional outcome improved over time for 13/16 (81%) hospital survivors (median mRS at hospital discharge 4 [3.75-5] vs. median mRS at last available follow-up 2 [1.75-3], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the long-term outcome can still be favorable in NORSE survivors, despite a prolonged and complicated ICU stay. Clinicians should be careful in taking EOL decisions to avoid the risk of a self-fulfilling prophecy. Our results encourage clinicians to continue treatment even in initially refractory cases.

Second-line immunotherapy in new onset refractory status epilepticus.

Several pieces of evidence suggest immune dysregulation could trigger the onset and modulate sequelae of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with prior fever known as febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES). Consensus-driven recommendations have been established to guide the initiation of first- and second-line immunotherapies in these patients. Here, we review the literature to date on second-line immunotherapy for NORSE/FIRES, presenting results from 28 case reports and series describing the use of anakinra, tocilizumab, or intrathecal dexamethasone in 75 patients with NORSE. Among them, 52 patients were managed with anakinra, 21 with tocilizumab, and eight with intrathecal dexamethasone. Most had elevated serum or cerebrospinal fluid cytokine levels at treatment initiation. Treatments were predominantly initiated during the acute phase of the disease (92%) and resulted, within the first 2 weeks, in seizure control for up to 73% of patients with anakinra, 70% with tocilizumab, and 50% with intrathecal dexamethasone. Cytokine levels decreased after treatment for most patients. Anakinra and intrathecal dexamethasone were mainly initiated in children with FIRES, whereas tocilizumab was more frequently prescribed for adults, with or without a prior febrile infection. There was no clear correlation between the response to treatment and the time to initiate the treatment. Most patients experienced long-term disability and drug-resistant post-NORSE epilepsy. Initiation of second-line immunotherapies during status epilepticus (SE) had no clear effect on the emergence of post-NORSE epilepsy or long-term functional outcomes. In a small number of cases, the initiation of anakinra or tocilizumab several years after SE onset resulted in a reduction of seizure frequency for 67% of patients. These data highlight the potential utility of anakinra, tocilizumab, and intrathecal dexamethasone in patients with NORSE. There continues to be interest in the utilization of early cytokine measurements to guide treatment selection and response. Prospective studies are necessary to understand the role of early immunomodulation and its associations with epilepsy and functional outcomes.

Clinical outcomes among initial survivors of cryptogenic new-onset refractory status epilepsy (NORSE).

OBJECTIVE: New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a rare but severe clinical syndrome. Despite rigorous evaluation, the underlying cause is unknown in 30%-50% of patients and treatment strategies are largely empirical. The aim of this study was to describe clinical outcomes in a cohort of well-phenotyped, thoroughly investigated patients who survived the initial phase of cryptogenic NORSE managed in specialist centers. METHODS: Well-characterized cases of cryptogenic NORSE were identified through the EPIGEN and Critical Care EEG Monitoring Research Consortia (CCEMRC) during the period 2005-2019. Treating epileptologists reported on post-NORSE survival rates and sequelae in patients after discharge from hospital. Among survivors >6 months post-discharge, we report the rates and severity of active epilepsy, global disability, vocational, and global cognitive and mental health outcomes. We attempt to identify determinants of outcome. RESULTS: Among 48 patients who survived the acute phase of NORSE to the point of discharge from hospital, 9 had died at last follow-up, of whom 7 died within 6 months of discharge from the tertiary care center. The remaining 39 patients had high rates of active epilepsy as well as vocational, cognitive, and psychiatric comorbidities. The epilepsy was usually multifocal and typically drug resistant. Only a minority of patients had a good functional outcome. Therapeutic interventions were heterogenous during the acute phase of the illness. There was no clear relationship between the nature of treatment and clinical outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: Among survivors of cryptogenic NORSE, longer-term outcomes in most patients were life altering and often catastrophic. Treatment remains empirical and variable. There is a pressing need to understand the etiology of cryptogenic NORSE and to develop tailored treatment strategies.

Time to FIRE NORSE: A single acronym for a heterogeneous presentation. Further information from a case series and discussion of the literature.

PURPOSE: New-Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus (NORSE) is a rare and severe form of refractory status epilepticus without an apparent underlying cause at presentation or prior history of epilepsy. We aimed to describe the clinical features, etiology, treatment, and outcomes of NORSE in adults in a quaternary-level hospital in Saudi Arabia. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective cohort study, inclusion criteria involved patients over 14 years old who met the 2018 consensus definition for NORSE. Patients were identified using a combination of medical record admission labels 'status epilepticus' and 'encephalitis', and continuous EEG reports documenting status epilepticus. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were collected and then analyzed for factors correlated with specific etiologies, better functional outcomes, and future diagnosis of epilepsy. RESULTS: We found 24 patients presenting with NORSE between 2010 and 2021. Fever/infectious symptoms were the most common prodrome. Elevated inflammatory serum and cerebrospinal fluid markers in most patients. Brain MRI revealed T2/FLAIR hyperintensity patterns, predominantly affecting limbic and perisylvian structures. The etiology of NORSE varied, with immune-related causes being the most common. Long-term outcomes were poor, with a high mortality rate and most survivors developing drug-resistant epilepsy. CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable insights into NORSE's clinical characteristics, highlighting the heterogeneity of this condition. The poor outcome is likely related to the progressive nature of the underlying disease, where refractory seizures are a clinical symptom. Thus, we propose to focus future research on the etiology rather than the NORSE acronym.

[A case of cryptogenic new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) in which cerebrospinal fluid IL-6 was elevated with increased seizure frequency early in the disease: a case report].

A 25-year-old male presented with clonic seizures three days following a fever. The patient developed status epilepticus and required mechanical ventilation and intravenous anesthesia. The patient's epileptic seizures persisted despite administering intravenous anesthesia and multiple anti-epileptic drugs. The clinical presentation in this case, without pre-existing relevant neurological disorder and an active structural, toxic, or metabolic cause in the acute phase, was compatible with new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). After immunotherapy, including intravenous methylprednisolone, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, the epileptic discharge on electroencephalogram (EEG) decreased gradually, and mechanical ventilation was discontinued. Neversless the final outcome was poor. The patient's condition was finally diagnosed as cryptogenic NORSE. The IL-6 levels in the cerebrospinal fluid showed a significant increase between day 6 and 11 after onset, during which time there was a rapid escalation in seizure frequency on EEG. Considering this, IL-6 may be involved in the process of seizure exacerbation.

Lidocaine as a potential therapeutic option for super-refractory status epilepticus: A case report.

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a rare and devastating condition and the prognosis is often poor, with half to two-thirds of survivors experiencing drug-resistant epilepsy, residual cognitive impairment, or functional disability, and the mortality rate is 16% to 27% for adults. We describe a patient with cryptogenic NORSE and favorable recovery from drug-resistant super-refractory SE after the use of intravenous lidocaine. The patient experienced fever and presented with refractory generalized tonic-clonic seizures. The cause was not found by performing extensive examinations, including cell surface autoantibodies and rat brain immunohistochemistry evaluations. The refractory SE with unresponsiveness to multiple anti-epileptic and prolonged sedative medications, which are necessary for prolonged mechanical ventilation, were ameliorated by additive treatment with intravenous lidocaine initiating at 1 mg/kg/h and maintaining at 2 mg/kg/h for 40 days, which led to freedom from intravenous sedative medication and mechanical ventilation. The patient was able to return to school. Lidocaine may be an optional treatment for cryptogenic NORSE.

Anti-N-methyl D-aspartate receptor encephalitis presenting with the new-onset refractory status epilepticus.

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a rare entity referring refractory status epilepticus (SE) in a patient without a history of epilepsy or an apparent cause. Herein, we report on a 31-year-old young female of anti-N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis admitted with NORSE. Her complaints began a week ago with a fever, meaningless movements, restlessness, and talking to herself. She had a history of operation for ovarian teratoma 10 years ago. Electrocardiography, hemogram, biochemistry, and neuroimaging were normal. Due to recurrent seizures despite intravenous diazepam infusions, phenytoin infusion was introduced, reducing the duration and frequency of seizures. Electroencephalogram (EEG) revealed a generalized slow background activity with low voltage and delta waves in left hemisphere derivatives without any epileptiform discharge. Autoimmune encephalitis panel revealed a positive anti-NMDAR receptor antibody. Intravenous immunoglobulins were given for 5 days. She was improved clinically and did not have a recurrent seizure. The history of our case emphasizes the importance of EEG and CSF antibody tests to reach the underlying etiology in patients presenting with refractory SE and neuropsychiatric symptoms of an unknown cause. Application of a proper treatment promptly with this approach could prevent the potential morbidity and mortality in these patients.

Neuromodulation in new-onset refractory status epilepticus.

Background: New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and its subset of febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) are devastating clinical presentations with high rates of mortality and morbidity. The recently published consensus on the treatment of these conditions includes anesthetics, antiseizure drugs, antivirals, antibiotics, and immune therapies. Despite the internationally accepted treatment, the outcome remains poor for a significant percentage of patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the use of neuromodulation techniques in the treatment of the acute phase of NORSE/FIRES using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Our search strategy brought up 74 articles of which 15 met our inclusion criteria. A total of 20 patients were treated with neuromodulation. Thirteen cases represented FIRES and in 17 cases the NORSE remained cryptogenic. Ten had electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), seven had vagal nerve stimulation (VNS), and four had deep brain stimulation (DBS); one patient had initially VNS and later DBS. Eight patients were female and nine were children. In 17 out of 20 patients, the status epilepticus was resolved after neuromodulation, while three patients died. Conclusion: NORSE can have a catastrophic course and the first treatment goal should be the fastest possible termination of status epilepticus. The data presented are limited by the small number of published cases and the variability of neuromodulation protocols used. However, they show some potential clinical benefits of early neuromodulation therapy, suggesting that these techniques could be considered within the course of FIRES/NORSE.

A practical approach to in-hospital management of new-onset refractory status epilepticus/febrile infection related epilepsy syndrome.

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is "a clinical presentation, not a specific diagnosis, in a patient without active epilepsy or other preexisting relevant neurological disorder, with new onset of refractory status epilepticus without a clear acute or active structural, toxic, or metabolic cause." Febrile infection related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is "a subcategory of NORSE that requires a prior febrile infection, with fever starting between 2 weeks and 24 h before the onset of refractory status epilepticus, with or without fever at the onset of status epilepticus." These apply to all ages. Extensive testing of blood and CSF for infectious, rheumatologic, and metabolic conditions, neuroimaging, EEG, autoimmune/paraneoplastic antibody evaluations, malignancy screen, genetic testing, and CSF metagenomics may reveal the etiology in some patients, while a significant proportion of patients' disease remains unexplained, known as NORSE of unknown etiology or cryptogenic NORSE. Seizures are refractory and usually super-refractory (i.e., persist despite 24 h of anesthesia), requiring a prolonged intensive care unit stay, often (but not always) with fair to poor outcomes. Management of seizures in the initial 24-48 h should be like any case of refractory status epilepticus. However, based on the published consensus recommendations, the first-line immunotherapy should begin within 72 h using steroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, or plasmapheresis. If there is no improvement, the ketogenic diet and second-line immunotherapy should start within seven days. Rituximab is recommended as the second-line treatment if there is a strong suggestion or proof of an antibody-mediated disease, while anakinra or tocilizumab are recommended for cryptogenic cases. Intensive motor and cognitive rehab are usually necessary after a prolonged hospital stay. Many patients will have pharmacoresistant epilepsy at discharge, and some may need continued immunologic treatments and an epilepsy surgery evaluation. Extensive research is in progress now via multinational consortia relating to the specific type(s) of inflammation involved, whether age and prior febrile illness affect this, and whether measuring and following serum and/or CSF cytokines can help determine the best treatment.

Perspective: Vagal nerve stimulation in the treatment of new-onset refractory status epilepticus.

Introduction: Resistance to drug therapy is a major hurdle in new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) treatment and there is urgent need to develop new treatment approaches. Non-drug approaches such as neuromodulation offer significant benefits and should be investigated as new adjunct treatment modalities. An important unanswered question is whether desynchronizing networks by vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) may improve seizure control in NORSE patients. Main text: We present a summary of published NORSE cases treated with VNS and our own data, discuss possible mechanisms of action, review VNS implantation timing, stimulation setting titration protocols and outcomes. Further, we propose avenues for future research. Discussion: We advocate for consideration of VNS for NORSE both in early and late stages of the presentation and hypothesize a possible additional benefit from implantation in the acute phase of the disease. This should be pursued in the context of a clinical trial, harmonizing inclusion criteria, accuracy of documentation and treatment protocols. A study planned within our UK-wide NORSE-UK network will answer the question if VNS may confer benefits in aborting unremitting status epilepticus, modulate ictogenesis and reduce long-term chronic seizure burden.

Ketogenic diet for super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) with NORSE and FIRES: Single tertiary center experience and literature data.

Background and purpose: Ketogenic diet (KD) is an emerging treatment option for super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE). We evaluated the effectiveness of KD in patients presenting SRSE including NORSE (and its subcategory FIRES). Methods: A retrospective review of the medical records was performed at the Necker Enfants Malades Hospital. All children with SRSE in whom KD was started during the last 10 years were included. A systematic search was carried out for all study designs, including at least one patient of any age with SRSE in whom KD was started. The primary outcome was the responder rate and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for the time-to-KD response. As secondary outcomes, Cox proportional hazard models were created to assess the impact of NORSE-related factors on KD efficacy. Results: Sixteen children received KD for treatment of SRSE, and three had NORSE presentation (one infectious etiology, two FIRES). In medical literature, 1,613 records were initially identified, and 75 were selected for review. We selected 276 patients receiving KD during SRSE. The most common etiology of SRSE was acute symptomatic (21.3%), among these patients, 67.7% presented with NORSE of immune and infectious etiologies. Other etiologies were remote symptomatic (6.8%), progressive symptomatic (6.1%), and SE in defined electroclinical syndromes (14.8%), including two patients with genetic etiology and NORSE presentation. The etiology was unknown in 50.7% of the patients presenting with cryptogenic NORSE, of which 102 presented with FIRES. Overall, most patients with NORSE benefit from KD (p < 0.004), but they needed a longer time to achieve RSE resolution after starting KD compared with other non-NORSE SRSE (p = 0.001). The response to KD in the NORSE group with identified etiology compared to the cryptogenic NORSE was significantly higher (p = 0.01), and the time to achieve SE resolution after starting KD was shorter (p = 0.04). Conclusions: The search for underlying etiology should help to a better-targeted therapy. KD can have good efficacy in NORSE; however, the time to achieve SE resolution seems to be longer in cryptogenic cases. These findings highlight the therapeutic role of KD in NORSE, even though this favorable response needs to be better confirmed in prospective controlled studies.

Investigating the genetic contribution in febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome and refractory status epilepticus.

Introduction: Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a severe childhood epilepsy with refractory status epilepticus after a typically mild febrile infection. The etiology of FIRES is largely unknown, and outcomes in most individuals with FIRES are poor. Methods: Here, we reviewed the current state-of-the art genetic testing strategies in individuals with FIRES. We performed a systematic computational analysis to identify individuals with FIRES and characterize the clinical landscape using the Electronic Medical Records (EMR). Among 25 individuals with a confirmed FIRES diagnosis over the last decade, we performed a comprehensive review of genetic testing and other diagnostic testing. Results: Management included use of steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in most individuals, with an increased use of immunomodulatory agents, including IVIG, plasma exchange (PLEX) and immunosuppressants such as cytokine inhibitors, and the ketogenic diet after 2014. Genetic testing was performed on a clinical basis in almost all individuals and was non-diagnostic in all patients. We compared FIRES with both status epilepticus (SE) and refractory status epilepticus (RSE) as a broader comparison cohort and identified genetic causes in 36% of patients with RSE. The difference in genetic signatures between FIRES and RSE suggest distinct underlying etiologies. In summary, despite the absence of any identifiable etiologies in FIRES, we performed an unbiased analysis of the clinical landscape, identifying a heterogeneous range of treatment strategies and characterized real-world clinical practice. Discussion: FIRES remains one of the most enigmatic conditions in child neurology without any known etiologies to date despite significant efforts in the field, suggesting a clear need for further studies and novel diagnostic and treatment approaches.

Neuropathology of New-Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus (NORSE).

New-Onset Refractory Status Epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with a preceding febrile illness known as FIRES (Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome), is one of the most severe forms of status epilepticus. Despite an extensive workup (clinical evaluation, EEG, imaging, biological tests), the majority of NORSE cases remain unexplained (i.e., "cryptogenic NORSE"). Understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying cryptogenic NORSE and the related long-term consequences is crucial to improve patient management and preventing secondary neuronal injury and drug-resistant post-NORSE epilepsy. Previously, neuropathological evaluations conducted on biopsies or autopsies have been found helpful for identifying the etiologies of some cases that were previously of unknown cause. Here, we summarize the findings of studies reporting neuropathology findings in patients with NORSE, including FIRES. We identified 64 cryptogenic cases and 66 neuropathology tissue samples, including 37 biopsies, 18 autopsies, and seven epilepsy surgeries (the type of tissue sample was not detailed for 4 cases). We describe the main neuropathology findings and place a particular emphasis on cases for which neuropathology findings helped establish a diagnosis or elucidate the pathophysiology of cryptogenic NORSE, or on described cases in which neuropathology findings supported the selection of specific treatments for patients with NORSE.

Review and standard operating procedures for collection of biospecimens and analysis of biomarkers in new onset refractory status epilepticus.

New onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with a preceding febrile illness known as febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), is one of the most severe forms of status epilepticus. The exact causes of NORSE are currently unknown, and there is so far no disease-specific therapy. Identifying the underlying pathophysiology and discovering specific biomarkers, whether immunologic, infectious, genetic, or other, may help physicians in the management of patients with NORSE. A broad spectrum of biomarkers has been proposed for status epilepticus patients, some of which were evaluated for patients with NORSE. Nonetheless, none has been validated, due to significant variabilities in study cohorts, collected biospecimens, applied analytical methods, and defined outcome endpoints, and to small sample sizes. The NORSE Institute established an open NORSE/FIRES biorepository for health-related data and biological samples allowing the collection of biospecimens worldwide, promoting multicenter research and sharing of data and specimens. Here, we suggest standard operating procedures for biospecimen collection and biobanking in this rare condition. We also propose criteria for the appropriate use of previously collected biospecimens. We predict that the widespread use of standardized procedures will reduce heterogeneity, facilitate the future identification of validated biomarkers for NORSE, and provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology and best clinical management for these patients.

The seasonality of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE).

The etiology of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), including its subtype with prior fever known as FIRES (febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome), remains uncertain. Several arguments suggest that NORSE is a disorder of immunity, likely post-infectious. Consequently, seasonal occurrence might be anticipated. Herein we investigated if seasonality is a notable factor regarding NORSE presentation. We combined four different data sets with a total of 342 cases, all from the northern hemisphere, and 62% adults. The incidence of NORSE cases differed between seasons (p = .0068) and was highest in the summer (32.2%) (p = .0022) and lowest in the spring (19.0%, p = .010). Although both FIRES and non-FIRES cases occurred most commonly during the summer, there was a trend toward FIRES cases being more likely to occur in the winter than non-FIRES cases (OR 1.62, p = .071). The seasonality of NORSE cases differed according to the etiology (p = .024). NORSE cases eventually associated with autoimmune/paraneoplastic encephalitis occurred most frequently in the summer (p = .032) and least frequently in the winter (p = .047), whereas there was no seasonality for cryptogenic cases. This study suggests that NORSE overall and NORSE related to autoimmune/paraneoplastic encephalitis are more common in the summer, but that there is no definite seasonality in cryptogenic cases.