First-line treatment with gefitinib in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous NSCLC with EGFR-mutation.

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of combination of gefitinib with chemotherapy and bevacizumab in treatment patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are currently unknown. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of a combination therapy consisting of gefitinib, bevacizumab, pemetrexed, and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. METHODS: Eligible patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous NSCLC were recruited and received gefitinib combination with bevacizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin treatment. The primary endpoints were safety and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: From June 2019 to June 2021, 20 patients were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up was 33.8 months (95% CI, 31.0-36.6). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events was 65%, including neutropenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (20%), nausea (20%), skin rash (20%), bleeding (10%), and increased ALT (10%). There was no death related to toxicity occurred. The median PFS was 28 months (95% CI, 20.4-35.6). the ORR was 95% (95% CI, 75.1-99.9%), the DCR was 100% (95% CI, 83.2-100%), and the median DOR was 26.4 months (95% CI, 18.9-33.9). The median OS has not been reached. CONCLUSION: The results of this study demonstrate that the four-drug combination regimen, led by gefitinib, is manageable and tolerated and effective for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

Phase II study of carboplatin plus weekly paclitaxel with bevacizumab for non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (Hanshin Cancer Group IP002).

BACKGROUND: There is an increased risk of acute exacerbation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia when treating patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. There is no standard optimal treatment regimen for patients with lung cancer complicated with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carboplatin (CBDCA), bevacizumab (Bmab) and weekly paclitaxel (PXT) in patients with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. METHODS: This phase 2 study involved chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Patients received CBDCA (area under the curve: 5 on day 1), PXT (70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15) and Bmab (15 mg/kg on day 1) every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled between January 2013 and October 2018 and received at least one course of the protocol treatment. The study was terminated before enrolling the planned number of patients because of poor accrual. The median patient age was 69 (range: 62-79) years, and 19 (90.5%) patients were men. The overall response rate was 61.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 38.4-81.9), meeting the primary endpoint. The median progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, and overall survival were 9.69 (95% CI, 5.78-11.63), 8.21 (95% CI, 3.75-11.63) and 20.93 (95% CI, 13.17-29.83) months, respectively. There was no acute exacerbation or treatment-related death during protocol treatment. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that patients with advanced non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer with idiopathic interstitial pneumonia could be effectively and safely treated using a combination of CBDCA, PXT and Bmab.

Antithetical impacts of deleterious LRP1B mutations in non-squamous and squamous NSCLCs on predicting benefits from immune checkpoint inhibitor alone or with chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone: retrospective analyses of the POPLAR/OAK and CHOICE-01 trials.

In non-small cell lung cancers, the non-squamous and squamous subtypes (nsqNSCLC and sqNSCLC) exhibit disparities in pathophysiology, tumor immunology, and potential genomic correlates affecting responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments. In our in-house training cohort (n=85), the presence of the LRP1B deleterious mutation (LRP1B-del) was associated with longer and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) on ICIs alone in nsqNSCLCs and sqNSCLCs, respectively (Pinteraction=0.008). These results were validated using a larger public ICI cohort (n=208, Pinteraction<0.001). Multiplex immunofluorescence staining revealed an association between LRP1B-del and increased and decreased numbers of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells in nsqNSCLCs (P=0.040) and sqNSCLCs (P=0.014), respectively. In the POPLAR/OAK cohort, nsqNSCLCs with LRP1B-del demonstrated improved PFS benefits from atezolizumab over docetaxel (hazard ratio (HR) =0.70, P=0.046), whereas this benefit was negligible in those without LRP1B-del (HR=1.05, P=0.64). Conversely, sqNSCLCs without LRP1B-del benefited more from atezolizumab (HR=0.60, P=0.002) than those with LRP1B-del (HR=1.30, P=0.31). Consistent results were observed in the in-house CHOICE-01 cohort, in which nsqNSCLCs with LRP1B-del and sqNSCLCs without LRP1B-del benefited more from toripalimab plus chemotherapy than from chemotherapy alone (Pinteraction=0.008). This multi-cohort study delineates the antithetical impacts of LRP1B-del in nsqNSCLCs and sqNSCLCs on predicting the benefits from ICI alone or with chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. Our findings highlight the distinct clinical utility of LRP1B-del in guiding treatment choices for nsqNSCLCs and sqNSCLCs, emphasizing the necessity for a detailed analysis based on pathological subtypes when investigating biomarkers for cancer therapeutics.

Effect of the thyroid transcription factor 1 expression and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events on progression-free survival in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy: a Japanese four-hospital, retrospective study.

Although a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) has been reported in the thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1) positive patients under treatment for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC), including immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, the association between TTF-1 expression and adverse event occurrence remains unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the impact of TTF-1 and its adverse events on PFS during pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy for NS-NSCLC. Patients who received the pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy from 1/1/2018 to 12/31/2022 and whose TTF-1 expression was measured were included in the study. This was a retrospective study conducted using electronic medical records. The mean age of the 79 patients was 67.5 ± 8.4 years, with 75.95% patients being male. Among them, 59.49% were TTF-1 positive. PFS comparison between TTF-1-positive and -negative patients showed a trend toward longer PFS for TTF-1 positive patients, though the results were statistically insignificant (P = 0.190). Proportional hazards analysis indicated significant PFS extension from treatment interruption, as adverse events related to cancer therapy stopped (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.32, P = 0.005) and the number of anticancer agents used (HR = 0.01, P < 0.001). Additionally, pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy for TTF-1-positive NS-NSCLC significantly extended PFS after treatment discontinuation as related adverse events stopped (827 vs. 210 days, P = 0.021). Measurement of TTF-1 may accordingly serve as a predictor of treatment response to the pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed and platinum chemotherapy. It may also be a predictor of patient prognosis when treatment is discontinued due to related adverse events.

Unraveling the influence of TTF-1 expression on immunotherapy outcomes in PD-L1-high non-squamous NSCLC: a retrospective multicenter study.

Introduction: Several studies explored the association between thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) and the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy. However, the effect of TTF-1 on the therapeutic efficacy of programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor/chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-Sq NSCLC) with a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score of 50% or more who are highly susceptible to immunotherapy remains unresolved. Therefore, we evaluated whether TTF-1 has a clinical impact on this population. Methods: Patients with non-Sq NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy between May 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Treatment efficacy was compared after adjusting for baseline differences using propensity score matching. Results: Among the 446 patients with NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression, 266 patients with non-Sq NSCLC were analyzed. No significant differences in therapeutic efficacy were observed between the TTF-1-positive and -negative groups in the overall and propensity score-matched populations. Of chemoimmunotherapy, pemetrexed containing regimen significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared to chemoimmunotherapy without pemetrexed, regardless of TTF-1 expression (TTF1 positive; HR: 0.46 (95% Confidence interval: 0.26-0.81), p<0.01, TTF-1 negative; HR: 0.29 (95% Confidence interval: 0.09-0.93), p=0.02). Discussion: TTF-1 expression did not affect the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy in patients with non-Sq NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression. In this population, pemetrexed-containing chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated superior anti-tumor efficacy, irrespective of TTF-1 expression.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab and platinum­based chemotherapy as neoadjuvant regimen for stage­IIIA non­squamous non­small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study.

Bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy provides modest benefits in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), while its application as a neoadjuvant regimen has yet to be validated. The present study aimed to assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage-IIIA non-squamous NSCLC. Data from 110 patients with stage-IIIA non-squamous NSCLC with negative driver genes, who received neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (n=50) or neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy alone (n=60), and tumor resection, were retrospectively reviewed in the current study. In addition, the data on pathological response, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were obtained. The results demonstrated that neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy did not significantly increase the pathological complete response (pCR) rate in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (18.0 vs. 8.3%; P=0.130). However, neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly increased the rates of DFS (P=0.007) and OS (P=0.049) compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. Adjustments were then performed using multivariate logistic or Cox regression analyses, which demonstrated that neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone only significantly independently prolonged DFS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.251; P=0.042], but did not significantly affect pCR (odds ratio=2.897; P=0.117) or OS (HR=0.297; P=0.158). Furthermore, no significant differences were demonstrated between the number of adverse events in patients receiving neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in comparison with those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (all P>0.05). In conclusion, neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy was only associated with a significant improvement in the rate of DFS, but showed limited efficacy in improving pCR and OS rates in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in patients with stage-IIIA non-squamous NSCLC. Therefore, a larger sample size and randomized controlled studies are needed for further validation of the findings of the present study.

Advanced non-squamous NSCLC with no actionable oncogenic driver in Spain: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of data from the Thoracic Tumor Registry.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the vast majority of all diagnosed lung cancers. According to their histology, most NSCLCs are considered non-squamous cell carcinoma (NSCC), and up to 85% of the latter may lack either one of the two main actionable oncogenic drivers (i.e., EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements). OBJECTIVE: Our analysis aimed to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of Spanish patients suffering from NSCC with no actionable oncogenic driver in daily clinical practice. DESIGN: A retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive analysis. METHODS: We analyzed the records of all Spanish patients with advanced NSCC diagnosed between January 2011 and January 2020 and included in the Spanish Thoracic Tumor Registry database. We evaluated the presence of metastasis and molecular profiling at the time of diagnosis and treatments received. We also assessed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) according to first-line treatment. RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred ninety-seven Spanish patients with NSCC were included. They were mainly men (73.2%), smokers (current [44.4%] and former [44.4%]) and presented adenocarcinoma histology (97.6%). Most patients had at least one comorbidity (80.4%) and one metastatic site (96.8%), and a non-negligible number of those tested were PD-L1 positive (35.2%). Notably, the presence of liver metastasis indicated a shorter median OS and PFS than metastasis in other locations (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy was more often prescribed than immunotherapy as first-, second-, and third-line treatment in that period. In first-line, the OS rates were similar in patients receiving either regimen, but PFS rates significantly better in patients treated with immunotherapy (p = 0.026). Also, a high number of patients did not reach second- and third-line treatment, suggesting the failure of current early diagnostic measures and therapies. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of the most lethal tumor in Spain could highlight the strengths and the weaknesses of its clinical management and set the ground for further advances and research.

First-line treatments for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy: a systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Introduction: The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy is a promising first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The cost-effectiveness of combinations with different ICIs is yet to be compared. Methods: We utilized Bayesian network meta-analyses for the comparisons of overall survival, progression-free survival, and incidence of adverse events of the included treatments in the total population and subgroups with different programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportional scores (TPS). The cost-effectiveness of the treatments from the perspectives of the US and Chinese healthcare systems was assessed using Markov models. Results: Three combinations, including pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (PembroC), nivolumab + ipilimumab + chemotherapy (NivoIpiC), and atezolizumab + chemotherapy (AteC), were included in our study. In terms of efficacy, PembroC was most likely to be ranked first for extending progression-free survival (PFS) (93.16%) and overall survival (OS) (90.73%). Nevertheless, from the US perspective, NivoIpiC and PembroC showed incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of $68,963.1/quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and $179,355.6/QALY, respectively, compared with AteC. The one-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were primarily sensitive to the hazard ratios for OS or the cost of immunotherapy agents. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000/QALY, NivoIpiC had the highest probability of being cost-effective (63%). As for the Chinese perspective, NivoIpiC and PembroC had ICERs of $145,983.4/QALY and $195,863.3/QALY versus AteC, respectively. The results were primarily sensitive to the HRs for OS. At a WTP threshold of $38,017/QALY, AteC had the highest probability of cost-effectiveness (94%). Conclusion: Although PembroC has the optimal efficacy, NivoIpiC and AteC were the most favorable treatments in terms of cost-effectiveness for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC from the US and Chinese perspectives, respectively.

Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor After Receiving Treatment for Non-small Cell Carcinoma.

Inflammatory pseudotumor encompasses a spectrum of both neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions characterized by a histological pattern featuring a proliferation of cytologically bland spindle cells, accompanied by a prominent chronic inflammatory infiltrate. Within this spectrum, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) has emerged as a distinct entity over the past two decades, marked by unique clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics. Typically affecting the visceral soft tissues of children and adolescents, IMT exhibits a propensity for local recurrence while posing a minimal risk of distant metastasis. They are extremely rare in adults, constituting less than 1% of adult lung tumors. Our patient, a 63-year-old female, has an intricate medical background, encompassing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a previous history of smoking (35 pack-years, quit a year before admission), coronary artery disease, non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and obstructive sleep apnea. Presenting with a diagnostic dilemma, she recently received treatment for non-small cell carcinoma with radiation therapy, which has evolved into a swiftly advancing case of IMT.

Efficacy and Safety of First-line Pembrolizumab Plus Platinum and Pemetrexed in Elderly Patients with Non-squamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

Objective Pembrolizumab plus platinum and pemetrexed (Pemb-Plt-PEM) combination therapy is an effective first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of programmed death ligand 1 expression. However, the effectiveness and feasibility of first-line Pemb-Plt-PEM therapy in elderly patients (≥75 years old) remain unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the safety and efficacy of first-line Pemb-Plt-PEM in elderly patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. Methods We retrospectively evaluated the data of patients ≥75 years old with non-squamous NSCLC who were treated with first-line Pemb-Plt-PEM from December 2018 to December 2020 at 10 institutes in Japan. Data on patient characteristics, efficacy of pemb-Plt-PEM therapy, and the type and severity of adverse events were reviewed. Results Thirty patients [20 men and 10 women; median age: 76 (range: 75-82) years old] were included in the analysis. The overall response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were 40.0%, 66.7%, and 7.5 and 24.0 months, respectively. The treatment-related deaths were caused by pneumonitis. First-line Pemb-Plt-PEM was associated with the PFS, based on the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). The PFS for low and high NLR values was 10.1 and 2.0 months, respectively. Furthermore, the sex and NLR influenced the association between Pemb-Plt-PEM and the OS. The OS for low and high NLR values was 32.8 and 2.6 months, respectively. Conclusion First-line pemb-Plt-PEM therapy is effective and feasible in elderly patients with non-squamous NSCLC.

Non-squamous Cancers of the Larynx.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although non-squamous tumors of the larynx are really rare, they may not always be viewed from the same perspective in the multidisciplinary treatment approach once the diagnosis is made. In this review, non-squamous tumors of the larynx and current approaches in treatment will be discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: When the studies and meta-analyses presented in the last 5 years are evaluated, it is seen that these tumors usually show non-specific symptoms. Due to their submucosal location, the stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis is often advanced. In the literature, treatment may vary in these particular cases. The majority of non-squamous tumors of the larynx includes minor salivary gland tumors, neuroendocrine carcinomas, sarcomas, cartilage tumors, and malignant melanomas. Once treating a patient with these diagnoses, it should be kept in mind that the histopathological subtype is almost as important as the stage of the tumor.

Anlotinib in Chinese patients aged ≥70 years with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer without prior chemotherapy: a multicenter, single-arm pilot trial.

Background: Based on pharmacoeconomics, drug availability and actual treatment, optimal treatment regimens for Chinese non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients over 70 years old are needed. Methods: This multicenter, single-arm pilot trial enrolled patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who refused systemic chemotherapy. Eligible patients received anlotinib (12 mg/day, d1-14, Q3W) until disease progression, intolerant toxicities, or withdrawal from the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Forty-nine patients were screened between January 2019 and September 2021, of whom 40 patients were eligible. The median age was 76 years. With a median follow-up period of 16.20 (95% CI: 8.77, 25.10) months, the median PFS was 5.45 months (95% CI: 3.52-9.23) and the median overall survival was 10.32 months (95% CI: 6.44-12.78). Three patients achieved a partial response and 34 had stable disease, with an objective response rate of 7.5% and a disease control rate of 92.5%. Thirty-three (82.5%; 33/40) patients reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade, and the incidence rate of grade ≥3 TRAEs was 35% (14/40). The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs were hypertension (4/40; 10.0%), hand-foot syndrome (3/40; 7.5%), and proteinuria (2/40; 5.0%). Conclusion: Anlotinib treatment was feasible and safe in Chinese elderly patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC who did not receive any systemic chemotherapy.

STK11/LKB1 alterations worsen the poor prognosis of KRAS mutated early-stage non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma, results based on the phase 2 IFCT TASTE trial.

BACKGROUND: STK11/LKB1 mutations have been associated with primary resistance to PD-1 axis inhibitors and poor prognosis in advanced KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of STK11/LKB1 alterations in localized non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinoma (non-sq NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Surgical samples from patients undergoing complete resection for stage IIa, IIb, or IIIa (N2 excluded) non-sq NSCLC in the randomized adjuvant phase II trial (NCT00775385 IFCT-1801 TASTE trial) were examined. Patients received either standard chemotherapy (Pemetrexed Cisplatin) or personalized treatment based on EGFR mutation (Erlotinib) and ERCC1 expression. Tumor molecular profiles were analyzed using targeted NGS and correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), adjusting for relevant clinical variables. Additionally, interactions between treatment groups and molecular alterations on OS, PD-L1 expression, and tumor-circulating DNA in post-operative plasma samples were evaluated. RESULTS: Among 134 patients (predominantly male smokers with adenocarcinoma), KRAS mutations were associated with shorter DFS (HR: 1.95, 95 % CI: 1.1-3.4, p = 0.02) and OS (HR: 2.32, 95 % CI: 1.2-4.6, p = 0.014). Isolated STK11/LKB1 mutations (n = 18) did not significantly impact DFS or OS. However, within KRAS-mutated samples (n = 53), patients with concurrent STK11/LKB1 mutations (n = 10) exhibited significantly shorter DFS (HR: 3.85, CI: 1.5-10.2, p = 0.006) and a trend towards shorter OS (HR: 1.80, CI: 0.6-5.3, p = 0.28). No associations were found between PD-L1 expression, other gene mutations, progression-free survival (PFS), or OS. CONCLUSION: This analysis reinforces KRAS mutations as predictive factors for relapse and poor survival in localized non-sq NSCLC. Furthermore, the presence of concomitant STK11/LKB1 mutations exacerbated the prognosis within the KRAS-mutated subset. These findings emphasize the clinical relevance of these molecular markers and their potential impact on treatment strategies in non-sq NSCLC.

Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: A better response evaluation criteria for patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer after bevacizumab treatment.

AIM: Cavitation of lesions is common in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-squamous-NSCLC) patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFRIs). However, traditional response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) do not take cavitation into consideration and may no longer be accurate for potentially reflecting the real clinical efficacy of anti-vessel growth therapy. Here, we aimed to optimize the traditional RECIST version 1.1 by adding cavitation into the evaluation criteria. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc radiologic review of 517 patients in a phase III clinical trial of bevacizumab biosimilar (SIBP04) combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of non-squamous NSCLC. Tumor responses were assessed by RECIST1.1 and mRECIST criteria (modified RECIST, a novel alternate method where the longest diameter of the cavity was subtracted from the overall longest diameter of that lesion to measure target lesions), respectively, and correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Cavitations of pulmonary lesions were seen in nine (2%) patients at baseline, and 97 (19%) during treatment. The use of mRECIST resulted in an alteration of the response category. For patients with post-therapy cavitation, the objective response rate was 56% using RECIST1.1 and 67% by mRECIST. In addition, the survival rates between partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease when the mRECIST was applied were significantly different (p < 0.05), while RECIST1.1 failed to show survival differences (p = 0.218). CONCLUSION: For patients with post-therapy cavitation, mRECIST exhibited higher predictability of survival than RECIST1.1. Response assessment might be improved by incorporating cavitation into assessment, potentially altering outcomes of key clinical efficacy parameters.

Survival Outcomes of Non-squamous Cell Carcinoma and Rare Squamous Cell Carcinoma Variants of the Larynx.

The literature focuses primarily on laryngeal differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and only a limited number of studies have evaluated the outcomes of rare variants of SCC (vSCC) and non-SCC malignancies (nSCC). To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the survival outcomes of these two groups. We retrospectively reviewed the records of 816 patients who underwent laryngeal surgery from January 2010 to November 2022. Forty-nine (6.2%) were identified as having unusual larynx malignancies and categorized in the nSCC or vSCC groups. The patients' clinicopathological features were then recorded. We compared the two groups' overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) outcomes. Thirty-three (4.2%) patients had vSCC, and 16 (2%) had nSCC. Forty-two (85.7%) were male, and the mean age was 58.57 years. The median follow-up time was 69 months. The 5-year OS rate was 71.4% in the nSCC group vs. 87.9% in the vSCC group (p = .055). Only surgical margin (HR: 4.68; 95% CI:1.13-19.37, p = .033) was an independent prognostic factor for OS in the multivariable analysis. The 5-year RFS rate was 50% for the nSCC group compared to 90.9% for the vSCC group (p < .001). In the multivariable analysis, surgical margin positivity (HR: 21.0, 95% CI 3.97-98.1, p < .001), and lymphovascular invasion (HR: 0.043, 95% CI 0.005-0.357, p = .004) were independent prognostic factors for RFS. Although OS did not show a statistical difference, nSCC malignancies of the larynx demonstrated worse OS and RFS outcomes than vSCC malignancies. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-03934-8.

A Phase II Study of S-1 plus Oxaliplatin for Patients with Recurrent Non-Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix (Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit: TGCU206 Study).

Recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma (non-SCC) of the uterine cervix is resistant to treatment and has a poor prognosis. The efficacy and safety of S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) therapy in patients with recurrent non-SCC was examined in a phase II study. Fifteen patients were enrolled between August 2013 and March 2023. S-1 was administered orally at a daily dose of 80-120 mg for 14 days, and oxaliplatin was administered intravenously at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on day 1. Each treatment cycle lasted 21 days. The anti-tumor effects, adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. The median patient age was 54 (41-74) years. The anti-tumor effect was rated as a partial response in five patients, stable disease in four, and progressive disease in 6. The overall response rate was 33% and the disease control rate was 60%. Regarding hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or more severity, leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 26.6-40.0%. None of the patients discontinued the treatment because of adverse events. The median PFS and OS were 6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2-11 months) and 22 months (95% CI: 11-23 months), respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. These results suggest that SOX therapy is useful for the treatment of recurrent non-SCC with promising anti-tumor effects and minimal adverse events.

Thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) expression and the efficacy of combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors and cytotoxic chemotherapy in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) is expressed in approximately 70% of lung adenocarcinomas and is one of the most reliable makers to distinguish primary lung adenocarcinoma from metastatic disease. TTF-1-negative status is a poor prognostic factor, and TTF-1-negative lung adenocarcinoma is associated with poor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy. However, the relationship between TTF-1 expression and the efficacy of ICI plus chemotherapy is still unclear. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 129 consecutive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC) treated with ICI monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy between January 2016 and December 2021. The expression of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) and TTF-1 was also determined in cases for which no previous data were available. We then evaluated the association between TTF-1 expression status and treatment efficacy. Results: Of the 129 cases, 33 were TTF-1-negative and 96 were positive. In the ICI monotherapy group (N=70), progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different between TTF-1-positive and negative patients (median 3.6 vs. 3.8 months, P=0.27); however, in patients with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), a trend for worse PFS was observed in TTF-1-negative cases compared with those that were TTF-1-positive (median 3.8 vs. 4.5 months, P=0.088). Moreover, long-term efficacy of ICI monotherapy (>2 years) was not observed in the TTF-1-negative group. TTF-1-negative patients tended to have worse overall survival (OS) than TTF-1-positive patients (median 15.6 vs. 19.5 months, P=0.13). In the ICI plus chemotherapy group (N=59), TTF-1-negative patients tended to have better PFS and similar OS compared with TTF-1-positive patients (median 9.9 vs. 9.6 months, P=0.14; median 32.3 vs. 18.9 months, P=0.78). Long-term efficacy was generally observed in TTF-1-negative patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin plus paclitaxel (ABCP) (median PFS 22.5 months, median OS not reached). Conclusions: ICI monotherapy is generally less efficacious in TTF-1-negative NS-NSCLC patients, and clinicians should consider ICI plus chemotherapy in these cases. Our study suggests that ABCP is an optimal regimen for TTF-1-negative NS-NSCLC.

A Random Forest Model for Post-Treatment Survival Prediction in Patients with Non-Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

BACKGROUND: Compared to squamous cell carcinoma, head and neck non-squamous cell carcinoma (HNnSCC) is rarer. Integrated survival prediction tools are lacking. METHODS: 4458 patients of HNnSCC were collected from the SEER database. The endpoints were overall survivals (OSs) and disease-specific survivals (DSSs) of 3 and 5 years. Cases were stratified-randomly divided into the train & validation (70%) and test cohorts (30%). Tenfold cross validation was used in establishment of the model. The performance was evaluated with the test cohort by the receiver operating characteristic, calibration, and decision curves. RESULTS: The prognostic factors found with multivariate analyses were used to establish the prediction model. The area under the curve (AUC) is 0.866 (95%CI: 0.844-0.888) for 3-year OS, 0.862 (95%CI: 0.842-0.882) for 5-year OS, 0.902 (95%CI: 0.888-0.916) for 3-year DSS, and 0.903 (95%CI: 0.881-0.925) for 5-year DSS. The net benefit of this model is greater than that of the traditional prediction methods. Among predictors, pathology, involved cervical nodes level, and tumor size are found contributing the most variance to the prediction. The model was then deployed online for easy use. CONCLUSIONS: The present study incorporated the clinical, pathological, and therapeutic features comprehensively and established a clinically effective survival prediction model for post-treatment HNnSCC patients.

First-line nivolumab, paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer: Updated survival analysis of the ONO-4538-52/TASUKI-52 randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: ONO-4538-52/TASUKI-52 was performed in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan to determine the oncological effectiveness and safety of combining nivolumab or placebo with bevacizumab plus platinum chemotherapy for the initial (first-line) treatment of patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC). At the interim analysis (minimum follow-up, 7.4 months), the independent radiology review committee-assessed progression-free survival was significantly longer in the nivolumab arm, but overall survival (OS) data were immature. METHODS: Here, we present the updated OS data. Patients with treatment-naïve stage IIIB/IV or recurrent nsNSCLC without driver mutations in ALK, EGFR, or ROS1, were randomized 1:1 to receive either nivolumab or placebo. Patients in both arms received paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab, administered 3-weekly for a maximum of 6 cycles. Nivolumab/placebo and bevacizumab were subsequently continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Overall, 550 patients were randomized. At the time of the analysis (minimum follow-up: 19.4 months), the median OS was longer in the nivolumab arm than in the placebo arm (30.8 vs. 24.7 months; hazard ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.94). The 12-month OS rates were 81.3% vs. 76.3% in the nivolumab vs. placebo arms, respectively. The respective 18-month OS rates were 69.0% vs. 61.9%. CONCLUSION: Nivolumab plus platinum chemotherapy and bevacizumab demonstrated longer OS vs. the placebo combination. We believe this regimen is viable as a standard, first-line treatment for patients with advanced nsNSCLC without driver mutations in ALK, EGFR, or ROS1.

First-generation EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy for advanced EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment modalities for previously untreated advanced EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This retrospective study included 196 advanced EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC. 107 received EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy (T), 53 received EGFR-TKI + bevacizumab (T + A), and 36 received EGFR-TKI + bevacizumab + chemotherapy (T + A + C). The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The median PFS was 27 months in the T + A + C group, 17 months in the T + A group, and 10 months in the T group. The multivariate analysis showed lower disease progression in the T + A + C group (HR, 0.377; 95% CI, 0.224-0.634; p < .001). Subgroup analysis showed that the T + A + C group did significantly improve PFS in patients with metastatic organs ≥2, brain metastases, liver metastases, and EGFR 19del compared to T + A group. No significant improvement in OS in the T + A + C group versus the T + A group, but a significant benefit in the subgroup of patients with metastatic organs ≥2. We also performed a subgroup analysis of the T + A + C group versus the T group, which similarly showed that the T + A + C group had better PFS than the T group in most subgroups, and the T + A + C group significantly improved OS in patients with metastatic organ ≥2 and liver metastases compared with the T group. The ORR was significantly higher in the T + A + C group than A + T and T groups (83.3% vs 71.7% vs 60.7%, p = .033). In safety, the T + A + C group had a higher incidence of AEs, but the majority was grade 1-2. The most frequent AEs of grade ≥ 3 were leukopenia (8.3%) and increased aminotransferase (8.3%) in the T + A + C group. CONCLUSIONS: First-generation EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy was a promising strategy for advanced EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC.