The prevalence of patients suffering from chronic spontaneous urticaria, in whom omalizumab cannot be stopped even after six years.

Background: Omalizumab (OMA) was the first FDA-approved biological drug for severe chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), and until today is the only beneficial and truly safe one. The objectives were: To assess the prevalence of CSU patients in whom OMA cannot be stopped over time. We also asked if biomarkers (e.g., anti-TPO antibodies and total IgE) could assist in anticipating this issue. Methods: We used our prospective registry of 93 patients, which included CSU disease duration, the onset of OMA treatment, Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) during follow-up, co-morbidities, serum IgE levels and the presence of anti-TPO antibodies. Finally, we assessed the response to OMA during a period of six years. Results: Out of the 93 treated CSU patients, OMA was stopped in ten patients after six months being defined as failures. In another ten patients, OMA was discontinued after 2-4 years of therapy, achieving a remission. Seventy-three patients are still treated between 2 and 6 years, having different degrees of response. Of these, in thirty-eight (52%) patients, we could not stop OMA even after six years due to CSU relapses. The prevalence of lower serum IgE levels and anti-TPO antibody positivity was significantly higher in CSU patients in whom OMA could not be stopped. Conclusion: This is the first study where OMA-treated CSU patients were followed up to six years. In half of them, long-term therapy of six years is still required.

The management of exercise-induced anaphylaxis in a Chinese child with biologics: a case report.

Exercise-induced anaphylaxis (EIA) is a rare and potentially life-threatening disorder. In difficult to control and refractory cases of EIA, biologics such as omalizumab and dupilumab have shown promise, with documented successful outcomes. Here, we present a case of EIA with lipid transfer protein (LTP) sensitization successfully treated with omalizumab with long-term follow-up. A 12-year-old girl presented to our allergy department because of recurrent episodes of EIA, with no specific food ingestion before exercise. Allergen testing revealed sensitization to weed pollens, particularly mugwort (76.1 kUA/L) and Alternaria alternata (10.8 kUA/L). Allergen component testing indicated sensitization to LTP components from mugwort Art v 3 (49.9 kUA/L), wheat Tri a 14 (2.03 kUA/L), and peach Pru p 3 (11.5 kUA/L), with a negative result for omega-5 gliadin. Despite initial prophylactic treatment with budesonide-formoterol (80/4.5 µg) and cetirizine (10 mg) before exercise, the patient still experienced EIA; she was then recommended for dupilumab therapy (an initial dose of 600 mg, followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks for six doses). However, even while undergoing dupilumab therapy, she suffered two anaphylactic episodes after running 800-1,000 m. With the patient's consent, a trial of omalizumab was initiated (injections of 300 mg every 4 weeks). After 2 months of omalizumab therapy, the patient showed significant improvement. She had been engaging in physical exercise three times a week and experienced a mild episode of urticaria. There were no further episodes of anaphylaxis or emergency room visits. By the fourth month of omalizumab treatment, she was able to consume food normally even just before exercising and had returned to her full activity level without any restrictions. This case presents the first successful off-label use of omalizumab in the prevention of EIA in the Chinese population. It is concluded that omalizumab may be helpful in resolving EIA symptoms, as evidenced by this case of successful long-term use.

Chest CT assess the impact of omalizumab treatment on airway remodeling in refractory asthma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the benefits of omalizumab treatment in patients through real-world follow-up and assess the impact of omalizumab treatment on airway remodeling using chest CT. METHODS: This is a single-center prospective, observational study included Chinese patients with refractory asthma who received omalizumab treatment from May 2021 to December 2022. We collected real-world clinical data, including their hospitalization information, pulmonary function, FENO, laboratory assessment, ACT scores, chest CT at baseline and every follow-up month. A comparison was made between the pre-treatment and post-treatment laboratory indicators, pulmonary function, airway parameters, and mucous plug scores under chest CT. RESULTS: This study included a total of 61 patients with refractory asthma treated with omalizumab. The study found that: ①regardless of whether the treatment lasted for a full four months or not, it significantly improved patient asthma control scores and reduced hospitalization costs and length of stay (p < 0.05). ②After four months of treatment, pulmonary ventilation function examination revealed significant improvements (p < 0.05) in MEF75, MEF50, MEF75/25, PEF, and FEV1/FVC. ③After four months of omalizumab treatment, the ratio of wall thickness and outer radius (T/D) and wall area percentage (WA%) of the bronchial wall decreased significantly (p < 0.05). ④After medication, the expression of airway mucous plugs decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab treatment can reduce airway wall thickness, decrease the percentage of airway wall area, and the expression of airway mucous plugs, thereby improving airflow limitation. Utilizing chest CT provides a novel and intuitive assessment of the efficacy of omalizumab treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, the number is ChiCTR2100046343.

Case report of secondary T-cell deficiency following the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.

We present a case of secondary T-cell deficiency particularly affecting CD4 T cells, along with the emergence of chronic spontaneous urticaria in a patient following COVID-19 vaccination. The condition was partially managed with omalizumab after initial first-line therapy proved ineffective.

Omalizumab is effective and safe in chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU): Real-world data from a large multi-national UCARE study.

BACKGROUND: Long-term data on the effectiveness and safety of omalizumab for chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU) in large populations are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, estimated omalizumab treatment duration and its predictors, as well as differences between CIndU subtypes, in a large long-term CIndU cohort. METHODS: A multinational multicenter study was conducted at 14 specialized urticaria centres (UCAREs), including all CIndU patients ever treated with omalizumab from 2009 until July 2022. Kaplan-Meier survival and regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Across 234 CIndU patients (55% female; mean age 37 years), 76% (n = 178) had standalone CIndU and 24% (n = 56) had predominant CIndU plus minor CSU, with an observation period up to 13 years. Most CIndU patients (73%, n = 145/200 with available data on response) had complete/good response to omalizumab treatment, without significant differences between CIndU subtypes. Sixty-two (26%) patients discontinued omalizumab; due to well-controlled disease (47%, n = 29), ineffectiveness (34%, n = 21), side effects (3%, n = 2), combination of ineffectiveness and side effects (3%, n = 2) and other reasons (13%, n = 8). The median estimated omalizumab treatment duration exceeded 5 years (54% drug survival at 5 years) and was mostly determined by well-controlled disease. Higher age predicted a lower chance to discontinue omalizumab due to well-controlled disease (HR 0.969, 95%CI 0.945-0.995). CIndU subtype and presence of minor CSU were not related to response and time until omalizumab discontinuation for any reason. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab is highly effective and safe in CIndU patients, with long estimated treatment duration mainly reflecting long disease duration. Our data show omalizumab's high potential as treatment in any subtype of CIndU and support its clinical use for these patients.

Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Current and Emerging Biologic Agents.

Antihistamine refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) has a prevalence of up to 50%. Anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) therapies have revolutionized management of CSU, yet refractory cases persist, suggesting a role for biologic agents that impact alternative routes of mast cell stimulation independent of cross-linking at FcεR1. This review addresses anti-IgE and Th2-targeted therapies in the management of CSU. In addition, we explore novel treatments targeting alternative pathways of mast cell activation including MAS-related G protein-coupled receptor-X2 and sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin-6, inhibiting intracellular signaling via Bruton's tyrosine kinase, and disrupting KIT activation by SCF.

Biologics in Food Allergies: Emerging Therapies.

Immunoglobuin E (IgE)-mediated food allergies greatly impact patients and their families, causing financial and emotional stress, and placing them at risk for lifethreatening reactions. Until recently, food allergies have been treated with allergen avoidance and emergency treatment of allergic reactions. Omalizumab was recently approved in adults and children greater than one year who are allergic to one or more foods for the prevention of serious allergic reactions in the setting of accidental exposure. Omalizumab also shows promise when combined with oral immunotherapy for possible allergen ingestion. Other classes of biologics and small molecule inhibitors have also demonstrated potential for use in preventing and treating food allergy.

Real-World Studies of Biologics for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Asthma.

Presently, there are 6 biologic agents available for treatment of asthma. Each of these agents has undergone robust clinical trials in their approval programs. Such studies rely upon very rigid entry criteria that may not translate to real-world efficacy. Thus, exploring the efficacy of these agents in a larger, more heterogeneous, population brings a sense of comfort regarding their efficacy in the real-world. This review explores the available literature regarding the use of biologics in the real world, with a focus on markers of likely response to therapy.

Reduced Sense of Smell in Patients with Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis and its Implications for Diagnosis and Management: A Narrative Review.

Reduced sense of smell is a common symptom in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Although it is often under-diagnosed by healthcare providers, reduced sense of smell can have a substantial negative impact on patient's quality of life as measured by health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessments and patient-reported outcomes. This narrative review describes current smell loss diagnosis and management guidelines in CRS, and the relationship between smell loss and CRS. Reduced sense of smell can be an indication of CRS disease severity in patients with (CRSwNP) and without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), and recovery of smell can be an indicator of successful CRS treatment. The current first-line therapeutic options for smell loss are intranasal corticosteroids and nasal irrigation, and second-line therapeutic options include systemic steroids and surgery. Shared decision-making between patient, caregiver, and healthcare provider is important when choosing the most appropriate CRS treatment option. Emerging biologic therapies that target type 2 inflammation signaling pathways, such as dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab, have been shown to improve smell and taste in randomized controlled trials of patients with CRSwNP.A graphical abstract and video abstract are available with this article.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory condition often associated with a loss of smell and taste. Patients with CRS and a loss of smell often rate their quality of life as poor and are more likely to also suffer from depression and anxiety than patients without smell loss. Patients with severe smell loss are also more likely to have increased severity of CRS disease by other measures. Standard treatments for smell loss include topical steroids, corticosteroids absorbed into the whole body system (systemic), and/or sinonasal surgery, but the effects may not last, and patients may experience side effects when they use repeated short bursts or long-term treatment with systemic corticosteroids. A newer treatment option for CRS is biologic therapy, which targets the immunologic pathways associated with inflammation. Biologic therapies have been shown to be effective in the treatment of CRS with nasal polyps including improvement in sense of smell. Here, we review the most common diagnostic tests and treatment options for CRS-associated smell loss and show how severity of smell loss is linked to severity of CRS. Supplementary file1 (MP4 60193 kb).

The Efficacy of Omalizumab in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps and Comorbid Severe Allergic Asthma.

Chronic rhinosinusitis whit nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is the most common comorbid disease accompanying asthma. Omalizumab is a recombinant anti-immunoglobulin (Ig) E antibody, and studies suggest that omalizumab may also affect CRSwNP regardless of asthma. We aimed to assess the effect of omalizumab treatment on CRSwNP accompanying severe allergic asthma (SAA) patients. Clinical data including spirometry measurements, serum/nasal secretion biomarker levels were collected. NP scores and CRS scores (Lund-Mancay [LM] scores) were also recorded before omalizumab treatment, as well as at the 4th and 12th months of omalizumab treatment. Twenty-one patients with both CRSwNP and SAA who underwent omalizumab therapy were assessed. There was a significant difference among forced expiratory volume (FEV1), ACT scores, NP scores, LM scores, serum IgE, and blood eosinophil levels of the patients before omalizumab therapy at the 4th and 12th months of omalizumab treatment. A significant negative correlation was observed between ∆FEV1 and ∆NP scores (r=-0.485), between ∆ACT and ∆NP scores (r=-0.469), and ∆ACT and ∆LM scores (r=-0.436). When we grouped the patients who benefited from 1 year of omalizumab therapy and those who did not in terms of NP, there was no difference between the two groups related to local eosinophil and local IgE levels in the nasal polyp biopsy. Omalizumab treatment is effective for asthma and CRSwNP in patients with CRSwNP accompanied by SAA. Improvement in asthma is associated with improvement in CRSwNP. The efficacy of omalizumab on NP in patients with CRSwNP accompanied by SAA is independent of local IgE and eosinophil counts.

Critical pathomechanisms of NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) clarified by treatment with omalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody.

Characteristic symptoms of NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) include asthma, chronic eosinophilic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, cysteinyl LT (CysLT) overproduction and NSAIDs hypersensitivity. Some N-ERD patients present with episodic treatment-resistant extra-respiratory symptoms (CysLT-associated coronary artery vasospasm, gastroenteritis, or skin rash). Even when using standard treatments for respiratory and extra-respiratory symptoms, including systemic corticosteroids and aspirin desensitization, it is difficult to control the clinical symptoms and severe type 2 inflammation involved with mast cells, eosinophils, ILC2s, and platelet activation. Few treatment options are applicable in a clinical setting. Therefore, identifying effective treatments is essential for managing N-ERD patients who suffer from these conditions. Our previous observational study demonstrated 12-month omalizumab treatment of N-ERD was clinically effective against respiratory symptoms. Despite the remaining eosinophilia, omalizumab significantly reduced urinary LTE4 and PGD2 metabolites to near normal levels at steady state. Based on the preliminary study, we demonstrated that omalizumab induced tolerance to aspirin in N-ERD patients 3 months after therapy initiation and suppressed activation of mast cells during 24 h of initiation in a randomized manner. Moreover, omalizumab had significant efficacy against extra-respiratory symptoms at baseline (lacking aspirin exposure) as well as throughout aspirin challenge. This review addresses the latest discoveries related to N-ERD pathogenesis and the significant effectiveness of omalizumab on N-ERD as a mast cell stabilizer. Our findings regarding omalizumab-associated mast cell inhibitory effects are indirect evidence that mast cell dysregulation and, possibly, IgE are pivotal components of N-ERD.

Role of specific immunoglobulin-E in chronic rhinosinusitis: Its clinical relevance according to nasal challenge test.

Background: Guidelines for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) propose total IgE and eosinophils as important biomarkers to identify type-2 inflammation. Despite the fact that specific IgE (sIgE) have been identified as a clinical predictor in some type-2 diseases for different clinical outcomes, its role in CRS has yet to be explored in detail. Objetive: To describe systemic and local sIgE in CRS and explore its possible association with clinical outcomes using nasal challenge tests (NCT). Methods: In CRS patients, we measure total IgE, serum sIgE (SsIgE) and nasosinusal sIgE (NsIgE) against 9 allergenic sources; Der p, Der f, Blo t, Can f, Fel d, Per a, grasses, Staphylococcus enterotoxin A, and B. NCT was done using the allergen with the higher sIgE prevalence (Der p). Results: A total of 174 patients were included. Prevalence of SsIgE was 52.8% and NsIgE 46.5%; Der p was the principal allergen for SsIgE and NsIgE. The presence of nasal polyps, asthma comorbidity, NSAID hypersensitivity, and hyposmia, were significantly associated with the presence of SsIgE and NsIgE but not with total IgE. NCT-Der p was performed in 73 CRS patients, being positive in 33 (45.2%). SsIgE have the best diagnostic accuracy (79.4%) to predict NCT results (NsIgE 67.5% total IgE 52%). Conclusion: Specific IgE is a better biomarker in CRS than total IgE. Patients with clinically relevant SsIgE have a pheno-endotype associated with different clinical outcomes. Considering the clinical relevance of SsIgE demonstrated by NCT, interventions like allergen immunotherapy in CRS must be study.

Efficacy and safety of omalizumab combined with allergen immunotherapy in children with moderate to severe allergic asthma.

KEY POINTS: Omalizumab enables children who are intolerant to AIT to initiate AIT successfully. Combination therapy better improves asthma and rhinitis symptoms, FeNO, and lung function compared to single SCIT or omalizumab treatment. Combination therapy reduces the incidence of adverse reactions during the initial phase of SCIT and enhances its safety.

Use of Omalizumab for Pediatric Asthma After US Food and Drug Administration Expanded Indications.

PURPOSE: Research and regulatory approval for pediatric uses of prescription drugs often lag years after adult approvals, during which time substantial off-label use of medications in children can occur. We evaluated whether US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory actions affected the pediatric use of omalizumab, a biologic drug used to treat asthma. METHODS: In this serial cross-sectional study, we identified quarterly cohorts of children (0-18 years) with moderate-to-severe asthma within two large national claims databases of those with commercial insurance and Medicaid from 2003 to 2019. Using an interrupted time-series analysis, we fit segmented linear regression models to identify changes in the incidence of omalizumab use in 6-11-year-old children compared with 12-18-year-olds after two time points: (1) 2009Q3 when an FDA advisory committee voted against use for 6-11-year-old children and (2) 2016Q2 when FDA expanded omalizumab's labeling to include 6-11-year-old children. RESULTS: We identified 9298 new pediatric omalizumab users (84% Medicaid). Among 6-11-year-old children, the incidence of omalizumab use did not change following the FDA's initial review of evidence in 2009 and increased after 2016 Q2 FDA approval for this age group in both Medicaid (58 per 100 000 children with asthma, 95% confidence interval [CI] 27-89, p < 0.001) and commercial insurance (57 per 100 000, 95% CI 21-94, p = 0.003) compared with 12-18-year-old children. CONCLUSIONS: The use of omalizumab among asthmatic children aged 6-11 years remained steady after FDA advisory committee concerns in 2009 and increased after FDA expanded the indication to include this population in 2016. Additional market incentives may help to ensure the timely generation of evidence and regulatory approval of medications for children.

Does Comorbid Food Allergy Affect Response to Omalizumab in Patients with Asthma?

Background: The intrinsic link between food allergy and asthma is well-established, and comorbidity can exacerbate both conditions. Omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody, has the biological plausibility to manage both conditions, but only a few small studies have assessed omalizumab in patients with comorbid asthma and food allergy. Patients and Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials (IA05 in children and 008/009 in adolescents/adults) and real-world observational studies (EXCELS and PROSPERO). For each study, patients with asthma were stratified by whether they had physician-reported food allergy, as per baseline characteristics data. Results: For patients with comorbid food allergy, there was evidence for increased atopy at baseline (numerically higher total IgE levels and atopic comorbidities). The collective body of evidence found that omalizumab consistently improved general and asthma-specific patient-centered outcomes (food allergy-specific outcomes were not available). For patients with asthma, omalizumab improved healthcare resource use (emergency room visits, hospitalizations, unscheduled doctor visits), quality of life (asthma-specific Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire), productivity (missed work/school days and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Asthma), and asthma outcomes (asthma exacerbations and Asthma Control Test score) regardless of comorbid food allergy. Conclusion: There was no loss of omalizumab efficacy even though patients with both asthma and food allergy appeared to be generally more atopic. Omalizumab may be a viable management option for patients with these comorbidities. Clinical trial registration: NCT00079937; NCT01922037; NCT00252135.

Food allergy and asthma are linked and if you have both conditions then you can feel worse. There is a treatment available, called omalizumab, that helps people with asthma and helps people with food allergy, but it's not clear if it can help people with both conditions. Here, we look at whether omalizumab can help people with bad to very bad asthma (also called moderate to severe asthma) who also have food allergy. We found that omalizumab improved many aspects of a person's life, including whether they visited the emergency room, were admitted to hospital, their quality of life, whether they missed school or work, and whether their asthma improved. These improvements occurred in all people with moderate to severe asthma, whether they had food allergy or did not have food allergy. This suggests that omalizumab can help people with both conditions.

Autoimmune Mast Cell Activation Test as a Diagnostic Tool in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is associated with skin mast cell activation, and its triggering mechanisms are not completely elucidated. Evidence suggests an autoimmune component of CSU. Our aim was to assess the usefulness of an autoimmune mast cell activation test (aiMAT) for diagnosing and differentiating CSU into different subtypes. We enrolled 43 patients with active, uncontrolled CSU before starting treatment with omalizumab and 15 controls. Patients were evaluated based on omalizumab response. aiMATs were performed using non-IgE-sensitized (NS) or myeloma IgE-sensitized (S) LAD2 cells, which were then stimulated with CSU/control sera (25 µL and 10 µL). The expression of CD63 was assessed with flow cytometry. CD63 response on NS-LAD2 was significantly increased in CSU patients compared to controls after the stimulation with 25 µL CSU/control sera (p = 0.0007) and with 10 µL CSU/control sera (p = 0.0001). The ROC curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82. The cutoff for autoimmune-non-IgE-sensitized-MAT was 40.3% CD63+ LAD2, which resulted in 73.3% sensitivity and 81.4% specificity. CD63 response on S-LAD2 was significantly increased in CSU patients compared to controls after the stimulation with 25 µL CSU/control sera (p = 0.03). The ROC curve analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.66. The cutoff for the autoimmune-myeloma IgE-sensitized-MAT was 58.4% CD63+ cells, which resulted in 62.8% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity. Overall, 36 out of 43 (84%) patients responded to omalizumab, and 7 (16%) were nonresponders. We found no differences between LAD2 CD63 response and response to omalizumab. In conclusion, aiMAT could represent a new diagnostic tool in CSU. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the potential benefits during omalizumab therapy.

Temporal variation in the effectiveness of biologics in asthma: Effect modification by changing patient characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The underlying population of patients selected for each respiratory monoclonal antibody might change as other biologics are approved. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effect modification by calendar time of the effectiveness of each respiratory biologics in asthma. METHODS: The Effectiveness of Respiratory biologics in Asthma (ERA) is a retrospective cohort of severe asthma patients from the Mass General Brigham clinics between January 2013 and September 2023. Periods were pre-specified as the anti-IgE (2013-2015), anti-IL5 (2016-2018), anti-IL4/13 (2019-2021) or anti-alarmin (2022-2023) era. We evaluated each biologic's effect on asthma-related exacerbations comparing the one-year period before and after therapy initiation using Poisson regression and Cox regression for time-to-first exacerbation. RESULTS: Of 647 biologic-naïve patients, 165 initiated omalizumab, 235 anti-IL5, 227 dupilumab, and 20 tezepelumab. Omalizumab's effectiveness improved as more biologics were approved: incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.16 [0.94-1.43] anti-IgE era vs. 0.54 [0.37-0.80] anti-IL4/13-alarmin era. Omalizumab patients in the anti-IL4/13-alarmin era had lower blood eosinophil counts and less chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). For anti-IL5s, effectiveness peaked in the anti-IL4/13 era (IRR 0.52 [0.42-0.64]) when patients had higher BMI and less concomitant CRSwNP. Dupilumab was most effective in the anti-IL4/13 era (IRR 0.60 [0.50-0.72]). There were fewer current smokers in dupilumab patients in the anti-IL4/13 era. Results were similar in time-to-event analyses and in sensitivity analyses accounting for the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: There are temporal variations in the effectiveness of biologics partly explained by the shift in the underlying population, particularly for omalizumab. Though having more choices was associated with better patient selection for omalizumab, this was inconsistent for other biologics.

The relationship between Fc epsilon receptor-1α and ß (FCER1A and FCER1B) gene polymorphisms in patients with chronic urticaria using omalizumab.

Introduction: Chronic urticaria requires well-defined treatment strategies in order to achieve a maximum treatment response and maintain the quality of life. Since 2014, omalizumab has been used in chronic urticaria. However, many studies showed that some patients are resistant to omalizumab. Aim: To determine the effects of single nucleotide changes in the FCER1A and FCER1B genes, which are thought to be related to resistance mechanisms, in our population of patients who have not responded to omalizumab treatment. Material and methods: We included 100 patients with chronic urticaria who were treated with omalizumab and 50 healthy individuals. Frequently observed gene polymorphisms, FCER1A (rs2251746) and FCER1B (rs569108), were examined in peripheral blood samples. The regions of rs2251746 and rs569108 gene polymorphisms were amplified using fluorescently labelled probes through real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The analysis was performed bioinformatically via the SNP genotype profiling program. Results: There was no statistically significant relationship between FCER1A (rs2251746) and FCER1B (rs569108) gene polymorphisms in patients and their clinical, demographic characteristics, and the resistance to treatment (p > 0.05). In our study, the mean patient age was found to be higher in the CT group (44.71 ±12.5 years) compared to the TT group (37.34 ±11.5 years) only in the rs2251746 polymorphism (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In our study, there was no significant relationship between FCER1A and FCER1B gene polymorphisms and resistance to omalizumab therapy. Further, multicentre, large-scale studies are needed to support our results.

Omalizumab reduces anaphylactic reactions and allows food introduction in food-allergic in children with severe asthma: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: In Europe, Omalizumab (anti-IgE) is indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe asthma, but not for IgE-mediated food allergy (FA). OBJECTIVE: We assessed the impact of Omalizumab on efficacy, safety, and quality of life (FA-QoL) in patients with moderate to severe asthma and who have a history of anaphylaxis to peanut, tree nuts, fish, egg, milk, and/or wheat. METHODS: Food-allergic children (6-18 years) with moderate to severe asthma underwent oral food challenges (OFCs) to establish the threshold of reaction to the culprit food(s) at baseline (T0) and at 4-month intervals (T1, T2, and T3) during their first year of treatment with Omalizumab. We recorded the number and severity of food-allergic reactions, Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, FA-QoL, and total IgE levels. RESULTS: In 65 patients allergic to 107 foods, the No Observed Adverse Events Level (NOAEL) at T1 increased: 243- and 488-fold for fresh and baked milk, respectively; 172- and 134-fold for raw and baked egg; 245-fold for hazelnut; 55-fold for peanut; 31-fold for wheat; and 10-fold for fish. Full tolerance was achieved in 66.4% of OFCs at T1, 58.3% at T2, and 75% at T3. Ninety-five foods were liberalized in the diet of 55 patients; the remaining 12 were introduced by 10 patients at least in traces. Throughout the study, 40 out of 65 were able to get a free diet. ACT increased from 17 (Q1-Q3: 15-17) to 23.6 (Q1-Q3: 23-25). The FA-QoL score in children ≤12 years decreased from 4.63 ± 0.74 to 2.02 ± 1.13, and in adolescents from 4.68 ± 0.92 to 1.90 ± 1.50. CONCLUSIONS: During Omalizumab therapy, a safe reintroduction of allergenic foods is feasible. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06316414.