RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Increasingly, aging societies pose a challenge, particularly in the most developed countries. This trend leads to an increasing group of old and very old patients presenting unique requirements and challenges. One of these challenges consists in reassessment and adaption of established treatment strategies for the elderly patients. There is an ongoing discussion taking place among cranio-maxillo-facial surgeons about the appropriate extent of reconstructive flap surgery for old patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This monocentric retrospective cohort study investigated 281 reconstructions with microvascular flaps by comparing the risk for a negative outcome, which was defined as revision, flap loss, and patient death, between three subgroups of elderly patients and younger patients. The three subgroups of elderly patients were defined as-1: young old (65-74 years), 2: old (75-84 years), and 3: oldest old (≥ 85 years). The group of the younger patients was defined by age between 50 and 64 years. Data were obtained within a defined period of 42 months. RESULTS: Significant correlations with a negative outcome were found for the variables stay on IMC/ICU, multiple flaps, and radiotherapy prior surgery. Our data showed no significant correlation between age and a higher risk for a negative outcome. CONCLUSION: Defect reconstruction with microvascular flaps in old patients is not related with a higher risk for a negative outcome. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Independently of age, treatment with microvascular flaps is an option for all operable patients, with an indication for oncologic surgery. For optimal therapy planning, individual patient resources and preferences should be considered instead of chronologic age.