Factors associated with changes in posterior corneal surface following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To identify factors associated with changes in the posterior corneal curvature following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: This retrospective study included myopic astigmatic eyes that underwent LASIK between January and December 2013 at Care-Vision Laser Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel. The average posterior keratometry was measured with the Sirius device at a radius of 3 mm from the center. The correlations between the surgically induced change in average posterior keratometry and preoperative parameters such as preoperative sphere, cylinder, spherical equivalent, central corneal thickness (CCT), refraction, Baiocchi Calossi Versaci (BCV) index, ablation depth, percent of tissue altered (PTA), and residual stromal bed (RSB) are reported. RESULTS: A total of 115 eyes with a mean age of 32.5 ± 8.3 years (range 22-56 years) were included. Central corneal thickness (p < 0.005), preoperative sphere (p < 0.001), spherical equivalent (p < 0.005), and preoperative posterior inferior/superior ratio (p < 0.05) were all significantly correlated with the percentage of change in the mean posterior K. According to ranked stepwise multiple regression analysis, 22% of the variance of change in posterior K could be explained by the examined factors. The factors that remained significant were the percentage of change in posterior inferior/superior ratio, preoperative subjective sphere, and preoperative mean posterior K (for all, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of change in posterior inferior/superior ratio, subjective sphere, and preoperative mean posterior K are all correlated with change in the mean posterior K after LASIK. Understanding of the variables that can influence posterior corneal changes following refractive surgery may play a role in the prevention of iatrogenic keratectasia.

Two-year stability of posterior corneal surface after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy with a residual stromal thickness less than 350 µm.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the stability of posterior corneal surface 2 years after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TPRK) in patients with a residual stromal thickness less than 350 µm. METHODS: In total, 408 eyes of 212 patients (160 women, 52 men) who underwent TPRK were enrolled in this retrospective study. All surgeries were performed in the Amaris 750S excimer laser platform with smart pulse technology. The posterior corneal elevation, anterior chamber depth, Q value, and curvature were measured using Pentacam preoperatively and postoperatively. All patients were followed up for 2 years. The relationship between percent tissue altered (PTA), age, and changes in posterior corneal surface was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was - 6.80 ± 1.18 D (range: - 9.00 to - 2.63 D). The mean residual stromal thickness was 336.46 ± 7.25 µm (range: 310-348 µm). The mean PTA was 30.93 ± 2.03% (range: 24.29-35.28%). At 2 years after surgery, the elevation of six points in the central area decreased by 1.91 ± 2.97 µm, 2.98 ± 3.23 µm, 1.17 ± 3.85 µm, 1.70 ± 2.88 µm, 1.36 ± 3.19 µm, and 1.65 ± 3.18 µm, compared with the preoperative value (P < 0.05). The elevation of three points in the peripheral area increased by 1.87 ± 6.34 µm, 0.68 ± 6.00 µm, and 0.95 ± 5.50 µm (P < 0.05). There was no significant linear relationship between PTA, age, and changes in posterior corneal surface, anterior chamber depth, and K2 (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Within 2 years after TPRK, the posterior corneal surface remained stable in patients with a residual stromal thickness between 310 and 350 µm. There was no sign of iatrogenic ectasia during the follow-up period.

Factors associated with changes in posterior corneal surface following photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To identify factors associated with changes in the posterior cornea curvature following laser refractive surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included myopic astigmatic eyes that underwent PRK between January 2013 and December 2013 at Care-Vision Laser Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel. The average posterior K was measured with the Sirius device at a radius of 3 mm from the center. The correlations between the surgical induced change in average posterior k and preoperative parameters such as central corneal thickness (CCT), refraction, Baiocchi Calossi Versaci index (BCV), ablation depth, percent tissue altered (PTA), and residual stroma bed (RSB) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 280 eyes with a mean age of 24.9 ± 6.1 years (range, 18-47 years were included in this study. The mean PTA was 14.8 ± 6.0%. A greater change in posterior K was found in females (p = 0.01), smaller treatment zones of 6.0 mm (p = 0.02) and PTA > 20% (p < 0.001). A lower CCT (r = - 0.24, p < 0.001), higher myopia (r = - 0.34, p < 0.001), higher astigmatism (r = - 0.17, p < 0.001), higher total BCV (r = 0.13, p = 0.03), lower back BCV (r = - 0.12, p = 0.05), higher front BCV (r = 0.16, p = 0.01), higher posterior I-S ratio (r = 0.16, p = 0.01), and a lower RSB (r = - 0.42, p < 0.001) were all significantly correlated with percentage of change in mean posterior K. In ranked stepwise multiple regression analysis, 26.2% of the variance of change in posterior K could be explained by the examined factors. The factors that remained significant were PTA (p < 0.001), CCT (p = 0.001), and posterior I-S ratio (p = 0.001). PTA alone accounted for 15% of the variance in posterior K changes in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding of factors affecting a change in posterior cornea after refractive surgery may have an important practical value for the prevention of iatrogenic keratectasia. Preoperative CCT, posterior I-S ratio, and PTA were significantly associated with changes in posterior K after PRK. PTA was the strongest predictor of posterior corneal changes (p < 0.001).

Could the percent tissue altered (PTA) index be considered as a unique factor in ectasia risk assessment?

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, predictability and stability of the percent tissue altered (PTA) formula in post-LASIK (laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis) ectasia risk assessment. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-three eyes from 104 patients with low to moderate myopia that underwent femtosecond LASIK were included in this retrospective, observational and longitudinal study. Seventy-eight eyes were classified in the higher-PTA (> 40%) group and 115 eyes in the lower-PTA (< 40%) group. Spherical manifest refraction, cylinder manifest refraction, logMAR and Snellen previous corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), anterior face Baiocchi Calossi Versaci index (BCVf) and posterior face (BCVb), central corneal thickness (CCT), estimated residual stromal bed (RSB), spherical aberration (SA) and root mean square (RMS) were reported. All patients were followed up for 4 years. RESULTS: In the higher-PTA group, 97% of eyes reported UDVA 20/20 or better, and in the lower-PTA group, all eyes achieved 20/20 or better. No group reported decreased visual acuity. The higher-PTA group obtained 55% of eyes within ± 0.50 D and 90% within ± 1.00 D; and the lower-PTA group obtained 63% of eyes within ± 0.50 D and 90% within ± 1.00 D. Both groups showed a refraction correction of 0.50 D or more in 36% and 31% of eyes, in the higher-PTA and the lower-PTA groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Percent tissue altered index should not be considered as a unique variable in post-LASIK ectasia risk assessment. Ectasia susceptibility screening should integrate tomography and biomechanical variables in order to help us to decide any refractive treatment choice and increasing refractive surgery safety.

Long-term safety of laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes with thin corneas: 5-year follow-up.

AIM: To investigate the long term (≥5y) efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with thin corneas [central corneal thickness (CCT) <500 µm]. METHODS: A total of 339 patients met the criteria of this study. Finally, 175 eyes of 89 patients who had thin corneas and underwent LASIK≥5y ago returned to our clinic and included in this study. Preoperative parameters recorded included uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, CCT and corneal topography. At returning visits, in addition to visual acuity and manifest refraction, ultrasound CCT and corneal topography were performed. Optical coherence tomography was used to measure the CCT, LASIK flap thickness, and residual stromal bed thickness (RSBT). Safety index, efficacy index, percentage of eyes within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D of refraction, percent tissue altered (PTA), and percentage stromal bed thickness (PSBT) were calculated. RESULTS: The safety index was 1.09 and efficacy index was 0.99. The percentages of eyes within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D were 71.2% and 87.7%, respectively. The mean PTA was 40%±6% (range 20% to 55%); 76 eyes (43.4%) had PTA <40% and 99 eyes (56.6%) had PTA≥40%. The mean RSBT was 303±27 µm (range 240 to 390 µm), and 2 eyes had RSBT<250 µm. The mean PSBT was 61%±9% (range 51% to 85%). No eyes developed ectasia. CONCLUSION: In this cohort with the PSBT of 50% or more, LASIK is safe with follow-up for at least 5y.

Ectasia following small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE): a review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Four cases of corneal ectasia after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) have been reported. In this review, we provide an overview of the published literature on corneal ectasia after SMILE and risk factors associated with this complication. METHODS: Case reports were identified by a search of seven electronic databases for pertinent heading terms between 2011 and July 2017. We identified patient characteristics and surgical details including preoperative topography, central corneal thickness, and anterior keratometry (Km). Residual stromal bed (RSB) values not reported were computed using VisuMax ReLEx SMILE software Version 2.10.10. Preoperative ectasia risk was measured using the Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System (ERSS). Percent tissue alteration was calculated for each patient as described by Santhiago et al. RESULTS: Seven eyes of four patients developed corneal ectasia post SMILE. Two patients had abnormal topography in both eyes. One patient had abnormal topography in one eye. Only one patient was noted to have normal topography in both eyes and later developed ectasia in one eye in the absence of any known risk factors. The mean Randleman ectasia risk score was 4±3 (range: 1-8). The mean calculated percent tissue altered (PTA) was 38%±6% (range: 30%-47%). CONCLUSION: A majority of reported ectasia cases occurred in patients with subclinical keratoconus. These conditions may be exacerbated by SMILE and should be considered absolute contraindications to the procedure. Three patients were identified to have high risk based on the ERSS, and one patient exhibited a PTA ≥40%. We formulated a modification to the current calculation of PTA that takes into account the differences in tissue altered between SMILE and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). More studies are needed to fully quantify the risk of ectasia. For now, we propose adopting the same exclusion criteria used for LASIK in the SMILE procedure until more specific metrics have been validated.