Utility of paired plasma and drainage fluid mNGS in diagnosing acute intra-abdominal infections with sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been increasingly applied in sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of mNGS of paired plasma and peritoneal drainage (PD) fluid samples in comparison to culture-based microbiological tests (CMTs) among critically ill patients with suspected acute intra-abdominal infections (IAIs). METHODS: We conducted a prospective study from October 2021 to December 2022 enrolling septic patients with suspected IAIs (n = 111). Pairwise CMTs and mNGS of plasma and PD fluid were sent for pathogen detection. The mNGS group underwent therapeutic regimen adjustment based on mNGS results for better treatment. The microbial community structure, clinical features, antibiotic use and prognoses of the patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Higher positivity rates were observed with mNGS versus CMTs for both PD fluid (90.0% vs. 48.3%, p < 0.005) and plasma (76.7% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.005). 90% of enrolled patients had clues of suspected pathogens combining mNGS and CMT methods. Gram-negative pathogens consist of most intra-abdominal pathogens, including a great variety of anaerobes represented by Bacteroides and Clostridium. Patients with matched plasma- and PD-mNGS results had higher mortality and sepsis severity. Reduced usage of carbapenem (30.0% vs. 49.4%, p < 0.05) and duration of anti-MRSA treatment (5.1 ± 3.3 vs. 7.0 ± 8.4 days, p < 0.05) was shown in the mNGS group in our study. CONCLUSIONS: Pairwise plasma and PD fluid mNGS improves microbiological diagnosis compared to CMTs for acute IAI. Combining plasma and PD mNGS could predict poor prognosis. mNGS may enable optimize empirical antibiotic use.

Evaluation of the management of intestinal perforation in very low birth infants, a 10-year review.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess outcomes of peritoneal drainage and laparotomy in the management of intestinal perforation secondary to necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and spontaneous intestinal perforation. METHODS: A retrospective review of all preterm infants (birthweight ≤1500 g) who underwent surgical intervention (peritoneal drainage and/or laparotomy) for intestinal perforation between March 2010 and March 2020. RESULTS: A total of 43 infants who underwent surgical intervention for intestinal perforation were included [19 (44%) with NEC and 24 (56%) with spontaneous intestinal perforation]. Peritoneal drainage was more commonly placed as the initial surgical procedure for management of spontaneous intestinal perforation compared with surgical NEC [23 (96%) vs. 11 (58%), p = 0.003]. Mortality was greater for infants who were initially managed with peritoneal drainage [11 (32%)] compared with those who underwent primary laparotomy [2 (22%), p = 0.5]. CONCLUSION: Initial surgical management of intestinal perforation is more often according to underlying pathology. Our data support primary laparotomy for infants with perforated NEC.

Efficacy of peritoneal drainage in very-low-birth-weight neonates with Bell's stage II necrotizing enterocolitis: A single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Currently, pediatric surgeons are challenged by a lack of consensus on the optimal management strategy (conservative or surgical) for children with Bell's stage II necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of peritoneal drainage in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) neonates with modified Bell's stage II NEC. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 102 NEC (modified Bell's stage II) neonates born with VLBW who were treated at the Fujian Children's Hospital (Fujian Branch of Shanghai Children's Medical Center) between January 2017 and January 2020; these included 24 cases in the peritoneal drainage group, 36 cases in the exploratory laparotomy group, and 42 cases in the conservative treatment group. RESULTS: The general characteristics were comparable in the three groups (P > 0.05). Compared with conservative treatment, peritoneal drainage was associated with significantly shorter fasting time, abdominal distension relief time, fecal occult blood (OB) negative conversion time, and reduced hospital length of stay (HLOS) (P < 0.05 for all). Despite some advantages of peritoneal drainage over conservative treatment in terms of cure, conversion to laparotomy, intestinal perforation, intestinal stenosis, and abdominal abscess rates, the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Compared to exploratory laparotomy, the fecal OB negative conversion time was significantly shorter in the peritoneal drainage group (P < 0.05); similarly, the exploratory laparotomy group showed longer fasting time, abdominal distension relief time, HLOS, and higher complication rate compared to peritoneal drainage group, but the between-group differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Peritoneal drainage, an easy-to-operate procedure, can improve the clinical symptoms of VLBW neonates with Bell's stage II NEC and help reduce the HLOS.

Laparotomy versus Peritoneal Drainage as Primary Treatment for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis or Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

AIM: to systematically review and meta-analyze the impact on morbidity and mortality of peritoneal drainage (PD) compared to laparotomy (LAP) in preterm neonates with surgical NEC (sNEC) or spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP). METHODS: Medical databases were searched until June 2022 for studies comparing PD and LAP as primary surgical treatment of preterm neonates with sNEC or SIP. The primary outcome was survival during hospitalization; predefined secondary outcomes included need for parenteral nutrition at 90 days, time to reach full enteral feeds, need for subsequent laparotomy, duration of hospitalization and complications. RESULTS: Three RCTs (N = 493) and 49 observational studies (N = 19,447) were included. No differences were found in the primary outcome for RCTs, but pooled observational data showed that, compared to LAP, infants with sNEC/SIP who underwent PD had lower survival [48 studies; N = 19,416; RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.79-0.90; GRADE: low]. Observational studies also showed that the subgroup of infants with sNEC had increased survival in the LAP group (30 studies; N = 9370; RR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.72-0.91; GRADE: low). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to LAP, PD as primary surgical treatment for sNEC or SIP has similar survival rates when analyzing data from RCTs. PD was associated with lower survival rates in observational studies.

Primary Peritoneal Drainage Versus Laparotomy for Perforated Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study at an Academic Center in Saudi Arabia.

Background and objective Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a detrimental complication of the gastrointestinal tract among preterm infants with very low birth weight (VLBW) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. About one-third of these cases require surgical intervention due to intestinal perforation. The preferred method for the surgical management of perforated NEC is still a matter of controversy. In light of this, we aimed to compare the outcomes of treating perforated NEC in VLBW infants with primary peritoneal drainage (PPD) versus laparotomy. Method We conducted a retrospective chart review of VLBW infants with perforated NEC treated at King Abdulaziz University Hospital between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2020. Results Twenty-seven infants with perforated NEC were identified; 12 were managed initially with PPD, and 15 underwent laparotomy. There was no difference between groups in terms of postoperative outcomes, length of hospital stay, or mortality before discharge. Among infants managed with PPD, 50% (5/10) underwent second drainage and survived, while 33% (4/12) underwent laparotomy. Conclusion We identified no difference in postoperative outcomes and mortality between managing perforated NEC in VLBW infants with either PPD or laparotomy. However, randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes and defined outcome measures are needed for reaching definitive conclusions.

Early laparoscopic-assisted surgery is associated with decreased post-operative inflammation and intestinal strictures in infants with necrotizing enterocolitis.

INTRODUCTION: In 2015, a protocol including early laparoscopy-assisted surgery in the treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was implemented at our institution. Carbon dioxide insufflation during laparoscopy may have an anti-inflammatory effect. We aimed to compare post-operative outcome after early laparoscopy-assisted surgery and classical laparotomy for NEC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Charts of premature infants undergoing surgery for NEC (2012-2021) were reviewed. Cases operated by early laparoscopy-assisted surgery (2015-2021) were compared to infants operated for NEC between 2012 and 2015 (laparotomy-NEC). Outcomes were post-operative CRP, need for reintervention, mortality, and the occurrence of post-NEC intestinal strictures. CRP was measured on the day of surgery (POD-0), 2 days (POD-2), and 7 days after surgery (POD-7). Data were compared using contingency tables for categorical variables and Student t-test or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Infants with NEC operated by early laparoscopy (n = 48) and laparotomy (n = 29) were similar in terms of perforation (60% vs 58%, p = 0.99) and POD-0 CRP (139 vs 124 mg/L, p = 0.94). Delay between first signs of NEC and surgery was shorter in the laparoscopy group (3 vs 6 days, p = 0.004). Early laparoscopy was associated with a lower CRP on POD-2 (108 vs 170, p = 0.005) and POD-7 (37 vs 68, p = 0.002), as well as a lower rate of post-operative intestinal stricture (34% vs 61%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In addition to being safe and feasible in premature infants, early laparoscopic-assisted surgery was associated with decreased NEC-related post-operative inflammation and strictures. A prospective, randomized study is needed in order to evaluate short and long-term effects of laparoscopy in infants with NEC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Initial surgical treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis: a meta-analysis of peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy.

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and the optimal intervention remains uncertain. To compare the mortality of primary peritoneal drainage versus primary peritoneal laparotomy as initial surgical intervention for NEC. All data were extracted from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies published up to December 2021. Patients with NEC. Studies centered on primary peritoneal drainage and primary peritoneal laparotomy as the initial surgical treatment. Mortality outcomes were available for both interventions. Randomized controlled trials, retrospective cohort studies, and case series in peer-reviewed journals. Language limited to English. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used to evaluate mortality outcome. Subgroup analyses and linear regression were performed to ascertain the association between mortality pre-specified factors. Data of 1062 patients received peritoneal drainage and 2185 patients received peritoneal laparotomy from five case series, five retrospective cohort studies, and three randomized controlled trials. Peritoneal drainage caused similar mortality (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.99-2.26) compared with peritoneal laparotomy as initial surgical management for NEC infants. The subgroup analysis of study design, sample size, birth weight, and sex showed similar findings, but inconsistent results were found for country (USA: 1.47, 95% CI 0.90-2.41; Canada: 2.53, 95% CI 0.30-21.48; Australia: 10.29, 95% CI 1.03-102.75; Turkey: 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.63) and gestational age (age mean difference < 3: 1.23, 95% CI 0.72-2.11; age mean difference ≥ 3: 2.29, 95% CI 1.04-5.05). No statistically significance was found for the linear regression between mortality and sample size (P = 0.842), gestational age (P = 0.287), birth weight (P = 0.257), sex (P = 0.6). Small sample size, high heterogeneity, NEC, and spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) had to be analyzed together, lack of selection criteria for the future selection of an intervention, and no clear, standardized procedures.   Conclusion: There was no significant difference in mortality between peritoneal drainage and laparotomy as initial surgical intervention. The results suggest that either intervention could be used in selected patients. What is Known: • Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and the optimal intervention remains uncertain. What is New: • No significant difference of mortality between peritoneal drainage and laparotomy as initial surgical intervention.

[Peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm low birth weight infants.] / Drenaje peritoneal versus laparotomía como abordaje para enterocolitis necrosante perforada en recién nacidos pretérmino de bajo peso.

El desarrollo de enterocolitis necrosante, con la consecuente perforación intestinal, es frecuente en los recién nacidos pretérmino. El tratamiento estándar de la perforación intestinal es quirúrgico. Sin embargo, se sugiere que la inserción de un drenaje en el abdomen puede ser efectivo para tratar esta afección. Se resumen los resultados de una revisión sistemática Cochrane que compara la efectividad del drenaje peritoneal con la de la laparotomía en neonatos con enterocolitis necrosante perforada.Necrotizing enterocolitis is common in preterm newborns, with consequent intestinal perforation. The standard treatment for intestinal perforation is surgery. However, it is suggested that inserting a drain into the abdomen may be effective in treating this condition. This document summarizes the results of a Cochrane systematic review comparing the effectiveness of peritoneal drainage with laparotomy in neonates with perforated necrotizing enterocolitis.

Drenaje peritoneal versus laparotomía como abordaje para enterocolitis necrosante perforada en recién nacidos pretérmino de bajo peso / Peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm low birth weight infants

Resumen El desarrollo de enterocolitis necrosante, con la consecuente perforación intestinal, es frecuente en los recién nacidos pretérmino. El tratamiento estándar de la perforación intestinal es quirúrgico. Sin embargo, se sugiere que la inserción de un drenaje en el abdomen puede ser efectivo para tratar esta afección. Se resumen los resultados de una revisión sistemática Cochrane que compara la efectividad del drenaje peritoneal con la de la laparotomía en neonatos con enterocolitis necrosante perforada.

Abstract Necrotizing enterocolitis is common in preterm newborns, with consequent intestinal perforation. The standard treatment for intestinal perforation is surgery. However, it is suggested that inserting a drain into the abdomen may be effective in treating this condition. This document summarizes the results of a Cochrane systematic review comparing the effectiveness of peritoneal drainage with laparotomy in neonates with perforated necrotizing enterocolitis.

Prophylactic Intra-Peritoneal Drainage After Pancreatic Resection: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drainage has been considered to be an effective measure to reduce postoperative complications after pancreatectomy. However, routinely placed drainage during abdominal surgery may be unnecessary or even harmful to some patients, due to the possibility of increasing complications. And there is still controversy about the prophylactic intra-peritoneal drainage after pancreatectomy. This meta-analysis aimed to analyze the incidence of complications after either pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) in the drain group and no-drain group. METHODS: Data were retrieved from four electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to December 2020, including the outcomes of individual treatment after PD and DP, mortality, morbidity, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF), bile leak, wound infection, postoperative hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying (DGE), intra-abdominal abscess, reoperation, intervened radiology (IR), and readmission. Cochrane Collaboration Handbook and the criteria of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality of studies included. RESULTS: We included 15 studies after strict screening. 13 studies with 16,648 patients were analyzed to assess the effect of drain placement on patients with different surgery procedures, and 4 studies with 6,990 patients were analyzed to assess the effect of drain placement on patients with different fistula risk. For patients undergoing PD, the drain group had lower mortality but higher rate of CR-POPF than the no-drain group. For patients undergoing DP, the drain group had higher rates of CR-POPF, wound infection and readmission. There were no significant differences in bile leak, hemorrhage, DGE, intra-abdominal abscess, and IR in either overall or each subgroup. For Low-risk subgroup, the rates of hemorrhage, DGE and morbidity were higher after drainage. For High-risk subgroup, the rate of hemorrhage was higher while the rates of reoperation and morbidity were lower in the drain group. CONCLUSIONS: Intraperitoneal drainage may benefit some patients undergoing PD, especially those with high pancreatic fistula risk. For DP, current evidences suggest that routine drainage might not benefit patients, but no clear conclusions can be drawn because of the study limitations.

Primary peritoneal drainage in neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis associated with congenital heart disease: a single experience in a Brazilian tertiary center

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a common condition in preterm infants. The risk factors that contribute to NEC include asphyxia, apnea, hypotension, sepsis, and congenital heart diseases (CHD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the treatment (surgery or drainage) and unfavorable outcomes in neonates with NEC and congenital heart diseases (NEC+CHD). A 19-year retrospective cohort study was conducted (2000-2019). Inclusion criterion was NEC Bell II stage. Exclusion criteria were associated malformation or genetic syndrome and those who did not undergo echocardiography or had a Bell I diagnosis. We included 100 neonates: NEC (n=52) and NEC+CHD (n=48). The groups were subdivided into NEC patients undergoing surgery (NECS, n=31), NEC patients undergoing peritoneal drainage (NECD, n=19), NEC+CHD patients undergoing surgery (NECCAS, n=21), and NEC+CHD patients who were drained (NECCAD, n=29). Multivariate analysis was performed to estimate the relative risk of death and the length of stay. Covariates were birth weight and gestational age. The group characteristics were similar. The adjusted relative risk of death was higher in the drainage groups [NECD (Adj RR=2.70 (95%CI: 1.47; 4.97) and NECCAD (Adj RR=1.97 (95%CI: 1.08; 3.61)], and they had the shortest time to death: NECD=8.72 (95%CI: 3.10; 24.54) and NECCAD=5.32 (95%CI: 1.95; 14.44). We concluded that performing primary peritoneal drainage in neonates with or without CHD did not improve the number of days of life, did not decrease the risk of death, and was associated with a higher mortality in newborns with NEC and clinical instability.

Protocol-Driven Surgical Care of Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation.

BACKGROUND: There is no clear consensus on the optimal operative management of premature infants with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis (sNEC) or spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP); thus, a protocol was developed to guide surgical decision making regarding initial peritoneal drainage (PD) versus initial laparotomy (LAP). We sought to evaluate outcomes after implementation of the protocol. METHODS: Pre-post study including multiple urban hospitals. Premature infants with sNEC/SIP were accrued after implementation of surgical protocol-directed care (June 2014-June 2019). Patients with a birth weight of <750 g and less than 2 wk of age without pneumatosis or portal venous gas were treated with PD on perforation. PD patients received subsequent LAP for clinical deterioration or continued meconium/bilious drainage. Postprotocol characteristics and outcomes were compared with institutional historical controls. Significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Preprotocol and postprotocol cohorts comprise 35 and 73 patients, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in age at intervention between historical control PD (14 ± 13 d) and postprotocol PD (9 ± 4 d) groups (P = 0.01), PD patient's birth weight (716 ± 212 g versus 610 ± 141 g, P = 0.02) and estimated gestational age of LAP patients (27 ± 1.7 wk versus 31 ± 4 wk, P = 0.002). PD was definitive surgery in 27% (12 of 44) of postprotocol patients compared with 13% (3 of 23) historical controls. A trend in improved survival postprotocol occurred in all PD infants (73% versus 65%), all LAP (75% versus 70%), and for initial PD and subsequent LAP (82% versus 67%). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of a surgical protocol in sNEC/SIP is associated with improved success of PD as definitive surgery and improved survival.

Trends in incidence and outcomes of necrotizing enterocolitis over the last 12 years: A multicenter cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe changes in the incidence and mortality of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and associated surgical management strategies for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on VLBW infants (≤1500 g or < 29 weeks) born 2006 to 2017 and admitted to 820 U.S. centers. NEC was defined by the presence of at least one clinical and one radiographic finding. Trends analyses were performed to assess changes in incidence and mortality over time. RESULTS: Of 473,895 VLBW infants, 36,130 (7.6%) were diagnosed with NEC, of which 21,051 (58.3%) had medical NEC and 15,079 (41.7%) had surgical NEC. Medical NEC decreased from 5.3% to 3.0% (p < 0.0001). Surgical NEC decreased from 3.4% to 3.1% (p = 0.06). Medical NEC mortality decreased from 20.7% to 16.8% (p = 0.003), while surgical NEC mortality decreased from 36.6% to 31.6% (p < 0.0001). In the surgical cohort, the use of primary peritoneal drainage (PPD) versus initial laparotomy rose from 23.2% to 46.8%. CONCLUSION: The incidence and mortality of both medical and surgical NEC have decreased over time. Changes in surgical management during this time period included the increased utilization of primary peritoneal drainage. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Usefulness of peritoneal drainage in extremely low birth weight infants with intestinal perforation: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: Necrotizing enterocolitis and intestinal perforation are the most common surgical emergency in the neonatal intensive care unit. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if peritoneal drainage (PD) is beneficial in extremely low birth weight infants with intestinal perforation. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of extremely low birth weight infants with a diagnosis of intestinal perforation. They were received primary PD (n = 23, PD group) or laparotomy (n = 13, LAP group). Laboratory and physiologic data were collected and organ failure scores calculated and compared between preprocedure and postprocedures. Data were analyzed using appropriated statistical tests. RESULTS: Between January 2005 and December 2015, 13 infants (male:female = 9:4) received laparotomy. Of 23 infants (male:female = 16:7) received PD, 20 infants received subsequent laparotomy. There were no demographic differences between PD and LAP groups. And there were no differences in total organ score in either group (PD, P = 0.486; LAP, P = 0.115). However, in LAP group, respiratory score was statistically improved between pre- and postprocedure organ failure score (P = 0.02). In physiologic parameter, PD group had a statistically worsening inotropics requirement (P = 0.025). On the other hand, LAP group had a improvement of PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: PD does not improve clinical status in extremely low birth weight infants with intestinal perforation.

Treatment of two newborns with esophageal atresia and distal tracheoesophageal fistula complicated by gastric perforation: choosing the simple way.

Objective: Gastric distention and perforation are possible results in a preterm newborn with esophageal atresia and distal tracheoesophageal fistula, especially when there is a need for mechanical ventilatory support. The results of the reported cases treated with emergency thoracotomy and fistula ligation after gastrostomy are not very satisfactory. Sometimes simple temporary solutions can be useful for stabilization and allow safety for required surgical treatment for later.Patient and methods: Two preterm newborns with esophageal atresia and distal tracheoesophageal fistula complicated by gastric perforation were reported.Results: Both of the patients were initially treated with a simple peritoneal drainage and, then the definitive operations were performed without any problem in stabilized patients.Conclusion: Performing fistula ligation or occlusion as an initial treatment in patients with impaired cardiac and respiratory functions may worsen the status of the patient. In such cases, it could be better to perform simple interventions first to facilitate subsequent treatments.

Establishing an indwelling peritoneal catheter as a standard procedure for hospitalized patients with ascites: Retrospective data on feasibility, effectiveness and safety.

Background: The use of an indwelling peritoneal catheter system in hospitalized patients with ascites could facilitate patient management by the prevention of repetitive abdominal paracentesis. Despite these possible benefits, the use of indwelling catheters is not widely established. Objective: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of the use of an indwelling catheter for ascites drainage in the clinical routine. Methods: This retrospective study included all indwelling peritoneal catheter placements in our department in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis between 2014 and 2017. Results: A total of 324 indwelling catheter placements for ascites in 192 hospitalized patients with cirrhosis were included. The catheter (7F, 8 cm) was placed ultrasound-assisted bed-side on the hospital ward. The technical success rate of the catheter placement was 99.7% (323/324). In 17.5% (64/324) the catheter was placed to optimize ascitic drainage prior to an abdominal intervention (e.g. transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt). The median time of catheter retention was 48 hours (8-168 hours) and the median cumulative amount of drained ascites 8000 ml (550-28,000). The most common adverse event was acute kidney injury (49/324, 15.1%); the risk was particularly higher in patients with a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score ≥ 16 (p = 0.028; odds ratio 2.039). Ascitic fistula after catheter removal was observed in 9.6% (31/324). Catheter-related infections occurred in 4.3% (14/324), and bleeding was documented in three cases (0.8%) with one major bleeding (0.3%). Conclusion: The placement of an indwelling catheter for repetitive ascitic drainage in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis can be established in the clinical routine, facilitating patient management. High-MELD patients especially have to be monitored for acute kidney injury.

Does Surgical Management Alter Outcome in Necrotizing Enterocolitis?

Necrotizing enterocolitis occurs in 14% of infants less than 1000 g. Preoperative management varies widely, and the only absolute indication for surgery is pneumoperitoneum. Multiple biomarkers and scoring systems are under investigation, but clinical practice is still largely driven by surgeon judgment. Outcomes in panintestinal disease are poor, and multiple creative approaches are used to preserve bowel length. Overall, recovery is complicated in the short and long term. Major sequelae are stricture, short gut syndrome, and neurodevelopmental impairment. Resolving controversies in surgical necrotizing enterocolitis care requires multicenter collaboration for centralized data and tissue repositories, benchmarking, and carrying out prospective randomized controlled trials.

Preliminary Evaluation of the Viability of Peritoneal Drainage Catheters Implanted in Rats for Extended Durations.

Purpose/Aim: In developing a novel peritoneal oxygenation therapy, catheters implanted into the peritoneal cavity became obstructed with omental tissue and prevented the infusion and removal of fluid from the peritoneal cavity. The obstruction of peritoneal catheters is a significant failure in researching various peritoneal treatments as further fluid administration is no longer possible. The purpose of this preliminary study was to determine the most effective catheter design for infusion and removal of fluid into the peritoneal cavity of rats. Materials and Methods: Four types of catheters were tested including the Jackson-Pratt, round fluted drain, flat fluted drain, and an original design. Three of each catheter type were surgically placed into the peritoneal cavity of rats (n = 12). In order to test the efficacy of each catheter, saline was infused and extracted twice daily. Catheters were scored on a weighted scale based on the amount of time they remained patent, the subjective force needed for extraction/infusion, and the amount of saline removed. Results: The round and flat fluted drain catheters remained patent for the full duration of the study (12 days) compared to the other models which failed after 7 days. These catheters also yielded a high average for extracted saline volume and an easy extraction/infusion. Conclusions: The round and flat fluted drain catheters were recognized as viable options to be used in rats for peritoneal drain studies of up to 12 days.

Meconium pseudocyst presenting as massive ascites in a new-born.

Meconium pseudocyst (MPC) is a rare but well-known surgical condition due to prenatal bowel perforation. A case of MPC secondary to prenatal bowel perforation is presented. Massive ascites requiring peritoneal drainage and disappearance of prenatal intraperitoneal calcifications have not been previously reported in MPC. MPC may present at birth with large ascites requiring peritoneal drainage to establish breathing and ventilation. Absence of prenatal intra-abdominal calcifications does not rule out MPC.