Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 594
Filtrar
1.
Curationis ; 47(1): e1-e12, 2024 Sep 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39354779

RESUMO

BACKGROUND:  Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains a major public health concern. Midwifery practitioners as frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) remain susceptible to occupational exposure to infections while performing their routine duties. It is estimated that 90% of occupational exposures occur because of a lack of awareness and training regarding prevention and measures to be taken in case of accidental exposure. OBJECTIVES:  The study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes and compliance of midwifery practitioners regarding post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) guidelines. METHOD:  Concurrent mixed-methods research approach with qualitative nested in quantitative design was followed. A random simple sampling technique was used to collect quantitative data from 71 midwifery practitioners. Simultaneously, a purposive non-probability sampling technique was used for the qualitative approach with two occupational health and safety (OHS) practitioners and 13 midwifery practitioners. Data were collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed with SPSS version 24 and presented in tables and figures, and thematic analysis was employed for the qualitative strand. RESULTS:  The midwifery practitioners have good knowledge about PEP for HIV. However, the study revealed the underreporting of accidental exposures to blood and body fluids (BBFs) and the underutilisation of available PEP services. CONCLUSION:  Maternity units are high-risk clinical environments. Underreporting of incidents of exposure remains prevalent among midwifery practitioners.Contribution: The findings will inform policy development structures and hospital management regarding knowledge and implementation gaps related to PEP guidelines in the specific hospitals. Strategies to improve compliance with PEP among midwifery practitioners were developed as a derivative from study findings.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Infecções por HIV , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição , Humanos , África do Sul , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/métodos , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/normas , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Adulto , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tocologia/normas , Tocologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Tocologia/métodos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Cureus ; 16(9): e69159, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39398839

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The most common way for people to contract the deadly zoonotic disease rabies is through animal bites. This study was designed because there is a shortage of community-based data to determine the true extent of rabies infection and a lack of understanding regarding patient misconceptions in urban areas. The objective was to determine the scope of the issue and the epidemiological features of animal bite incidents. METHODOLOGY: This was a facility-based cross-sectional study conducted at the field practice area (Urban Health Training Centre) under the Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College. The study duration was one year (May 2023 to April 2024). Consecutive patients (accompanied by an attendant) attending the Urban Health Training Centre were included in the study. A purposive sampling technique was used, and around 400 animal bite cases were recorded in one year at the Urban Health Training Centre. RESULTS: Out of 1503 male cases at the Urban Health Training Centre, around 255 were dog bite cases (50.6%), whereas out of 1302 females visiting the Urban Health Training Centre, around 145 were dog bite cases (48%). The majority (35%) belonged to the age group of 11 to 20 years for both males and females. The mean age of the cases was 19.4 ± 3.4 years. The study found a male preponderance (64%), with females constituting 36%. The right lower limb (49.5%), left lower limb (39%), and upper limb were the most frequently bitten sites. Fifty-one percent of the cases fell into Category II. According to local data, the most popular home management practices were ghee oil and cold treatments. Although Category III is the most severe bite, only 35% had taken the anti-rabies vaccine (ARV), and 8.75% had received rabies immunoglobulin. CONCLUSION: The public and medical community need to be made aware of the importance of wound care and the prudent use of the anti-rabies vaccine.

3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39324586

RESUMO

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

4.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 966, 2024 Sep 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39272017

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rabies is an incessant public health threat in China. The Ministry of Health implemented the Central Payment for Rabies Prevention and Control Project to assist with rabies prevention and control in a few representative provinces in 2006. METHODS: Data on human rabies cases reported by the National Infectious Disease Reporting Information Management System and national surveillance sites from 2006 to 2022 were collected, and statistical and multivariate analyses were then used to assess the effectiveness of current prevention and control efforts. RESULTS: During 2006-2022, a total of 2025 human rabies cases were collected by the national surveillance sites, with incidence rates far above the national average, but the incidence rate was consistent with the national trend. Human rabies cases demonstrated a dual peak distribution in terms of exposure and onset dates, with the peak exposure dates falling mostly in the spring and summer and the peak onset dates occurring mostly in the summer and autumn. Three danger categories are shown by the geographical distribution: high, medium and low. Dogs had a high infection rate (86.93%), with own domesticated dogs accounting for the majority of infections. The rates of post-exposure prophylaxis are not constant. The median incubation period was 71 days. CONCLUSIONS: Various measures and policies implemented by the government have played a key role in reducing the incidence of rabies. To effectively prevent and control the resurgence of epidemics and halt the spread of the virus among host animals, it is imperative to prioritize and implement a robust dog management system, accelerate research and development of animal vaccines and improve the level of post-exposure prophylaxis.


Assuntos
Raiva , Raiva/epidemiologia , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Raiva/veterinária , China/epidemiologia , Humanos , Animais , Cães , Incidência , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Criança , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estações do Ano , Pré-Escolar , Adulto Jovem , Doenças do Cão/epidemiologia , Doenças do Cão/virologia , Doenças do Cão/prevenção & controle , Lactente , Idoso , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição , Vacina Antirrábica/administração & dosagem
5.
Int J Risk Saf Med ; 2024 Sep 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39240591

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers face a high risk of blood-borne infections due to needlestick injuries, especially in developing countries like Pakistan. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of needlestick injuries, reporting practices, and post-exposure prophylaxis measures among healthcare personnel in tertiary care hospitals in Punjab. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted from May to July 2019. Data were collected from healthcare personnel working in teaching hospitals across six randomly selected cities of Punjab. Data were collected from 600 healthcare personnel using a pretested, self-administered questionnaire, employing stratified random sampling to ensure representative sampling. Descriptive statistics were applied, and differences in needlestick injuries across demographic segments were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests. RESULTS: Among the 600 respondents, 533 returned the complete questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 88.8%. The majority of respondents were female (n = 341, 64.2%). The mean years of service was 5.58 (±5.78), with most participants falling in the 0.5-5 years category (n = 338, 66.4%). The prevalence of self-reported needlestick injuries in the last six months was 35.25%. Most injuries occurred during sampling (n = 95, 35.85%), followed by recapping (n = 63, 23.77%). Reporting of needlestick injuries to the respective department was poor, with only 82 (21.87%) injuries reported. The frequency of needlestick injuries differed significantly across profession, working department, and education categories (p < 0.05). Sanitary staff were more likely to sustain needlestick injuries during garbage collection and waste handling. Post-exposure screening for blood-borne infections was received by 79 (42.93%) individuals, and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) was administered to 67 (36.41%). CONCLUSION: The high prevalence of needlestick injuries among healthcare personnel occurred primarily during sampling and recapping. Reporting of NSIs was inadequate, and post-exposure testing and prophylaxis practices were substandard. Enhanced policies and protocols are necessary for effective NSI surveillance and the administration of pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis.

6.
Heliyon ; 10(15): e35673, 2024 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39170215

RESUMO

To assess the factors that influencing the persistence of virus neutralizing antibody (VNA), and to establish prediction models to provide the appropriate timing for booster administration, a cohort of post-exposure rabies vaccine recipients was investigated. The VNA determined records from 2019 to 2023 and interrelated factors were analyzed, including gender, age, rabies immunoglobulin (RIG) administration, vaccine products, vaccination schedule, and vaccination intervals etc. The geometric mean of VNA titre within 1 month after primary vaccination with 2-1-1 schedule was statistically higher than that with 5-dose course (P = 0.031). The interaction between exposure and vaccination schedule was observed on primary vaccination, which showed that a decrease of 19.74 % (95 % CI: 5.99%-64.95 %, P = 0.008) of VNA titre among vaccinee with 5-dose and exposure III. Individuals with RIG administration produced lower VNA titres than those without RIG administration (P = 0.001). Vaccine products (Chengda, P = 0.015; human diploid cell, P = 0.026) and re-exposed time (P = 0.000) exhibited independent effects following booster vaccination. Based on the prediction model, the 99 % individual prediction intervals (IPI) of VNA titres were established at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months for the 12 characteristic populations respectively. The cases of VNA below 0.5 IU/ml first appeared at 6 months in group D of primary vaccinations and at 10 years in group F of boosters. We conclude that for primary vaccination 2-1-1 schedule is more efficient than 5-dose; the use of residual rabies immunoglobulin for distal intramuscular injection isn't recommended. The 99 % IPI of VNA titres could provide the appropriate timing for booster vaccination.

8.
Sex Transm Infect ; 2024 Aug 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39209541

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the awareness, willingness to use and use of doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (doxyPEP) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW) in Belgium. Additionally, we aimed to identify factors associated with doxyPEP use and concerns regarding antimicrobial resistance (AMR). METHODS: Cross-sectional online survey among MSM and TGW in Belgium in April 2024. Participants were recruited through sexual networking applications and social media of community-based organisations. Numerical variables were compared with Wilcoxon rank-sum test and categorical variables with χ2 or Fisher's exact tests. Factors associated with doxyPEP use were assessed using logistic regression. Willingness to use doxyPEP and concerns about side effects/AMR were assessed before and after presenting a brief paragraph on the potential effects of doxyPEP on AMR. RESULTS: 875 individuals initiated the survey. Almost all identified as men (860/875, 98.3%) with a median age of 40 years (IQR 32-48), 40.4% (n=352/875) had heard of doxyPEP and 9.4% (n=82/875) had used it, among whom the majority used it within the previous 6 months (70/81, 86.4%). In multivariable logistic regression, doxyPEP use was associated with reporting ≥1 sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the previous 12 months, engagement in chemsex, HIV status and pre-exposure prophylaxis use, and education level.About 80% of the participants initially reported being willing to use doxyPEP, and about 50% reported being concerned about side effects. After reading about the potential effects of doxyPEP on AMR, willingness to use decreased to 60% and concerns of side effects/AMR increased to around 70%. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 10 MSM in Belgium reported using doxyPEP. A recent history of STIs and STI risk factors were positively associated with doxyPEP use. Importantly, concerns about AMR and side effect influenced willingness to use doxyPEP. If doxyPEP is introduced, informing patients about doxyPEP benefits and risks is crucial to enable informed decision-making.

9.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 11(8): ofae436, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39139581

RESUMO

We report the experience of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide for nonoccupational postexposure prophylaxis in sexual assault cases. Between June 2021 and October 2023, 39 individuals completed the 28-day follow-up; 41% experienced some side effects, and 1 person discontinued the drug because of a rash. No individuals seroconverted to HIV during the follow-up period.

10.
Sex Transm Infect ; 2024 Aug 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39097410

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to identify the efficacy, adherence, safety and impact on antimicrobial resistance of postexposure prophylaxis with doxycycline (Doxy-PEP) in different populations. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from inception to 29 May 2024. Two reviewers independently screened the studies and extracted data. We included randomised clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy of Doxy-PEP within 72 hours after condomless sex. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to compare the risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) between Doxy-PEP and no prophylaxis. The risk of bias was assessed with the risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) and the certainty of evidence (CoE) with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Four studies were included in the systematic review, totalling 1727 participants. Studies were conducted between 2015 and 2022. Most participants (73%) were men who have sex with men, and the median age of participants varied from 24 to 43 years. Doxy-PEP reduced the risk of having any bacterial STI in different populations by 46% (hazard ratio (HR) 0.54; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.75; CoE moderate), the risk of chlamydia by 65% (relative risk (RR) 0.35; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.82; CoE low) and syphilis by 77% (RR 0.23; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.41; CoE high), without significant effect for risk of gonorrhoea infection (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.64 to 1.26; CoE very low). The self-reported adherence rate of Doxy-PEP was approximately 80% and one drug-related serious adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: Doxy-PEP reduced the incidence of chlamydia and syphilis infections. No significant reduction in gonorrhoea infection was observed. This strategy seems promising for some high-risk groups; however, there is still a lack of information on the induction of bacterial resistance and long-term adverse events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER.

11.
World J Clin Cases ; 12(22): 5042-5050, 2024 Aug 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39109016

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Enhancing awareness and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is vital to curb human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) spread. High-risk behaviors prevalent among sexually transmitted infection clinic outpatients underscore the need for increased PrEP/PEP education in this group. AIM: To investigate the effects of both onsite and online health education on the knowledge of, and willingness to use, PrEP and PEP among individuals receiving PEP services. METHODS: Participants were drawn from a cohort study on PEP service intervention at an STD/AIDS outpatient clinic in designated HIV/AIDS hospitals in Beijing, conducted from January 1 to June 30, 2022. Health education was provided both onsite and online during follow-up. Surveys assessing knowledge of, and willingness to use, PrEP/PEP were administered at baseline and again at 24 wk post-intervention. RESULTS: A total of 112 participants were enrolled in the study; 105 completed the follow-up at week 24. The percentage of participants with adequate knowledge of, and willingness to use, PrEP significantly increased from 65.2% and 69.6% at baseline to 83.8% and 82.9% at the end of the intervention (both P < 0.05). Similarly, those with adequate knowledge of, and willingness to use, PEP increased from 74.1% and 77.7% at baseline to 92.4% and 89.5% at week 24 (P < 0.05). Being between 31 years and 40 years of age, having a postgraduate degree or higher, and reporting a monthly expenditure of RMB 5000 or more were found to be significantly associated with knowledge of PrEP and PEP (both P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The findings show that both onsite and online health education significantly improved the knowledge of, and increased willingness to use, PrEP and PEP in individuals utilizing PEP services.

12.
J Int AIDS Soc ; 27(8): e26341, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39155429

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is an efficacious prevention method when initiated promptly after an HIV exposure. Yet, PEP has been underutilized, even among healthcare workers (HCWs) with occupational exposure in sites with PEP policies and procedures and access to PEP medications. It is important to understand the dynamics of uneven PEP use in what appears to be an optimal context to better protect the health and wellbeing of HCWs. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review to elucidate factors influencing HCWs' use of PEP after occupational exposure. We searched PubMed, PsychInfo and Google Scholar for peer-reviewed literature published in English from 2014 to 2022 using the terms HIV, postexposure/post-exposure prophylaxis, acceptability, healthcare workers, and values and preferences. An inductive narrative review of the resulting 53 studies identified core themes. RESULTS: Nearly all studies (96%) with various HCW types and settings occurred in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Africa and Asia. Identified themes arrayed along a trajectory of PEP use experience: awareness/knowledge; acceptability; availability/access; uptake/use; adherence/completion. Across studies, awareness of PEP for HIV prevention was high, knowledge about drug regimens and healthcare facility policies was moderate to low; acceptability of PEP was moderate to high; PEP's perceived accessibility/availability was inconsistent and varied by geographic location and setting; HCWs' uptake of PEP was low, affected by not knowing how to report an exposure and being unaware of PEP availability; and adherence/completion of PEP regimens was moderate to low, impeded by side effects and a belief that completing regimens was unnecessary to avert seroconversion. HCWs consistently expressed concern about HIV stigma. DISCUSSION: Findings are limited by the inconsistent use of constructs across studies and a lack of clarity about reporting exposure events. Multi-level approaches are needed to address the interplay of individual, social and structural barriers that diminish HCWs' PEP use. Improved training, incident reporting, 24-hour access to non-stigmatizing PEP services and monitoring of adherence/completion are essential to optimizing HCWs' PEP use. CONCLUSIONS: Lessons from HCWs' experience in LMICs may inform understanding of PEP under-use among people in these settings with non-occupational exposures.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Pessoal de Saúde , Exposição Ocupacional , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição , Humanos , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/métodos , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , África , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Ásia
13.
Infection ; 2024 Jul 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39042326

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Doxycycline post-exposure prophylaxis (Doxy-PEP) reduces the likelihood of Chlamydia and early syphilis by approximately two-thirds. Currently, data on the frequency of Doxy-PEP use in men who have sex with men (MSM) are limited. This study aimed to assess knowledge, attitude towards, and frequency of Doxy-PEP use among MSM in Germany. METHODS: We conducted a national online survey in Germany from summer to fall 2023, recruiting MSM and transgender women. Participants were invited to complete the online survey through social media, online dating platforms, and print media advertisements with active recruitment and poster advertising in private practices, tertiary outpatient clinics, and MSM community events in Germany. RESULTS: In total, 438 participants completed the survey and were included in the analysis, and 285 (65.1%) were living with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or taking HIV-pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Overall, 170 participants (38.8%) had heard of Doxy-PEP, and 275 (62.8%) would consider taking it, but only 32 (7.3%) reported having ever taken Doxy-PEP. The most common reason for a negative attitude towards Doxy-PEP were apprehension about insufficient detailed information, and concerns about antibiotic resistance. Doxy-PEP users were more likely to be on HIV-PrEP, had a higher self-reported risk of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and often had a history of bacterial STIs. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated high awareness and strong interest in Doxy-PEP among MSM in Germany, most of whom were living with HIV or taking HIV-PrEP; however, the actual usage of Doxy-PEP remains low in the summer and fall of 2023.

14.
Mol Immunol ; 173: 53-60, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39053389

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Shigellosis is a gastrointestinal disease causes high morbidity and mortality worldwide, however, there is no anti-Shigella vaccine. The use of antibiotics in shigellosis treatment exacerbates antibiotic resistance. Antibodies, particularly egg yolk antibody (IgY), offer a promising approach to address this challenge. This study aimed to investigate the prophylactic effect of IgY produced against a recombinant chimeric protein containing the immunogens IpaD, IpaB, StxB, and VirG from Shigella. METHODS: The chimeric protein, comprising IpaD, IpaB, StxB, and VirG, was expressed in E. coli BL21 and purified using the Ni-NTA column. Following immunization of chickens, IgY was extracted from egg yolk using the PEG-6000 method and analyzed through SDS-PAGE and ELISA techniques. Subsequently, the prophylactic efficacy of IgY was assessed by challenging of mice with 10 LD50 of S. dysenteriae and administering different concentrations of IgY (1.25, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg/kg) under various time conditions. RESULTS: The recombinant protein, weighing 82 kDa, was purified and confirmed by western blotting. The IgY concentration was determined as 9.5 mg/ml of egg yolk and the purity of the extracted IgY was over 90 %. The results of the ELISA showed that at least 19 ng of pure antibody identified recombinant protein and reacts with it. The challenge test employing IgY and Shigella demonstrated a direct correlation between the survival rate and antibody concentration, with increased concentrations leading to decreased mortality rates. Treatment of mice with 10 mg/kg IgY leads to 80 % survival of the mice against 10 LD50 S. dysenteriae. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that IgY may offer therapeutic potential in treating Shigella infections and combating antibiotic resistance.


Assuntos
Galinhas , Disenteria Bacilar , Gema de Ovo , Imunoglobulinas , Animais , Imunoglobulinas/imunologia , Camundongos , Gema de Ovo/imunologia , Disenteria Bacilar/prevenção & controle , Disenteria Bacilar/imunologia , Shigella/imunologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/imunologia , Proteínas Recombinantes/imunologia , Feminino , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/imunologia , Camundongos Endogâmicos BALB C , Antígenos de Bactérias/imunologia , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/imunologia , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/farmacologia
15.
Aust N Z J Public Health ; 48(4): 100179, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39053109

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) became available in Victoria, Australia, in 2016. We examined non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) usage among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM) before and after PrEP became available. METHODS: We included MSM attending Melbourne Sexual Health Centre for nPEP between 2011 and 2021. We analysed three periods: the 'pre-PrEP' (01 Jan 2011 to 25 Jul 2016), 'PrEP before COVID-19' (26 Jul 2016 to 31 Dec 2019), and 'PrEP during COVID-19' (01 Jan 2020 to 31 Dec 2021). RESULTS: There were 222,978 consultations for MSM; 8292 (3.7%) were nPEP consultations. The proportion of nPEP consultations increased from 3.3% (3093/94263) in the pre-PrEP period to 4.3% (3843/89251) in the PrEP before COVID-19 period then dropped to 3.4% (1356/39464) during the COVID-19 period. Compared to Australian-born MSM, MSM born in Central/South America (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-2.40) had the highest odds of accessing nPEP, followed by Asian-born MSM (aOR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.27-1.71) after adjusting for PrEP availability and COVID-19. Those newly arrived in Australia in ≤4 years had higher odds (aOR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.05-1.22) of accessing nPEP than those living in Australia for >4 years. CONCLUSION: nPEP prescriptions declined with PrEP availability. Newly arrived overseas-born MSM who are unlikely to have access to subsidised PrEP have a higher demand of nPEP. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Increasing PrEP education and ensuring equal access is vital in the drive to reduce new HIV diagnoses.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções por HIV , Homossexualidade Masculina , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Humanos , Masculino , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Homossexualidade Masculina/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Vitória , Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Saúde Sexual , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Austrália , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto Jovem
16.
J Int AIDS Soc ; 27(7): e26336, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39020454

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Identifying the optimal approaches to offering HIV prevention to meet the needs of those at risk is a high priority, particularly given the expanding toolkit of biomedical HIV prevention options. An ongoing study in rural East African communities evaluated the uptake of choices in product, testing mode and location of care delivery through a structured patient-centred HIV prevention delivery model. In this qualitative study, we sought to understand clients' experiences of this "dynamic choice prevention model" (DCP) and highlight pathways of action to inform HIV prevention delivery models. METHODS: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted from November 2021 through March 2022 with a purposively selected sample of n = 56 participants in DCP trials (across outpatient departments, antenatal clinics and community settings), and n = 21 healthcare providers (total n = 77). A seven-person multi-regional team translated and inductively coded transcript data. We used a framework analysis approach to identify emergent themes. RESULTS: Individuals taking up HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) reported feelings of relief, liberation from fears of acquiring HIV and satisfaction with being able to take action despite partners' behaviours. Couples used a range of approaches afforded by the study to persuade partners to get tested and opt for PrEP. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) use was less common, although women welcomed it in the event of sexual coercion or assault. Participants discussed switching from PEP to PrEP after familiarizing themselves with usage and ascertaining ongoing risk. Participants felt respected by providers, trusted them and appreciated being able to contact them directly for telephone support. Prevention uptake was hindered by stigma, limited experience with and knowledge of prevention methods, gendered and generational power dynamics within intimate partnerships and families, and negative perceptions of methods due to the products themselves. Participants anticipated long-acting injectable PrEP could solve their challenges regarding pill size, daily pill burden and the likelihood of unwanted disclosure. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse preferences and barriers to uptake of prevention require a choice of HIV prevention options, locations and delivery modalities-but in addition, flexible, competent and friendly care provision is crucial to promote uptake. Helping clients feel valued, and addressing their unique needs and challenges, enables their agency to prioritize their health.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , População Rural , Humanos , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição/métodos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Entrevistas como Assunto , África Oriental , Adulto Jovem , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem
17.
Front Microbiol ; 15: 1425766, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39040907

RESUMO

Introduction: While rabies remains a global concern, detailed studies on human rabies, particularly regarding causal animals and the reasons for not receiving postexposure prophylaxis (PEP), are lacking. Methods: We conducted a 3-year prospective study (October 2019-September 2022) at the Philippines' largest rabies referral center. We interviewed patients with suspected rabies and their families. We used LN34 qRT-PCR and rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test on saliva samples. We also compared our findings with two retrospective studies at the same hospital. Results: We enrolled 151 patients, including 131 with potential rabies exposure. Similar to retrospective studies, the participants were predominantly males (75.5%), adults (76.8%), low-income individuals (91.4%), and rural dwellers (62.3%). The causal animals were mainly dogs (97.0%), with similar incubation periods, clinical symptoms, and a high proportion not receiving vaccines or immunoglobulins (93.2%). Most causal animals were owned by either the patients' households or their neighbors (60.2%), with a significant proportion being puppies (58.8%). Most patients had knowledge of rabies; however, reasons for not seeking PEP included misconceptions about minor bites not causing rabies (51.3%), beliefs in traditional healers (33.9%), and economic constraints (22.6%). Despite completing the WHO regimen, two PEP failures were observed. LN34 qRT-PCR detected 98 positive cases (sensitivity, 64.9%; 95% CI 56.7-72.5). These strains belong to the Southeast Asia 4 subclade. Discussion: In conclusion, this study highlights the role of puppies as primary causal animals and the presence of misconceptions that preclude patients from acquiring PEP.

18.
F1000Res ; 13: 175, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39015143

RESUMO

Background: Rabies is 100% preventable by administering early and complete post exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Animal bite victims must have the knowledge and attitude necessary to seek appropriate medical care at the earliest to receive the required PEP. Objectives: The present study sought to ascertain the health-seeking behavior of animal bite victims, their knowledge and attitude regarding rabies prophylaxis, the PEP they received, and their level of compliance with the full course of anti-rabies vaccination. Methods: The study included animal bite cases that presented to the anti-rabies clinic and matched the eligibility criteria. All the required details were recorded using an internally validated structured questionnaire. All participants were followed up for six months to ensure their health conditions and compliance with the vaccination schedule. Results: Out of 1058 respondents, 57.9% were adults, with 46.6% belonging to middle socioeconomic class. 91.1% of them were informed biting animals as dogs. Before arriving at the anti-rabies clinic, 93.3% of the study subjects washed their wounds, and 62.4% visited to another health facility. Rabies knowledge was inadequate among the study participants, only 54.8% being mindful about the disease and its prevention. The compliance with the full course of antirabies vaccination was found to be 77.9%. All subjects were healthy, confirming that PEP is safe and effective. Conclusion: Regular social and behavioral change communication (SBCC) needs to be implemented with regard to health-seeking behavior.


Assuntos
Mordeduras e Picadas , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição , Raiva , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Humanos , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/métodos , Animais , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Cães , Vacina Antirrábica/administração & dosagem , Vacina Antirrábica/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Índia , Criança , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Inquéritos e Questionários , Idoso
19.
Cureus ; 16(6): e62429, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39011185

RESUMO

Rabies, a millennia-old viral infection transmitted through animal bites, poses a lethal threat to humans, with a historic fatality rate of 100% if left untreated. Louis Pasteur's introduction of the rabies vaccine in 1885 marked a turning point in the battle against rabies, preventing numerous cases. The purpose of this paper is to review the historical development, current challenges, and future prospects of rabies vaccination and treatment, with emphasis on the importance of continued research and collaborative efforts in the quest to eradicate this deadly infection. Historical vaccine development progressed from inactivated to live-attenuated forms, with modern recombinant techniques showing promise. The preventive measures at present primarily involve vaccination, but challenges persist, such as differing safety profiles and immunogenicity among vaccine types. Pre-exposure prophylaxis with a three-dose vaccine series is crucial, especially in high-risk scenarios. Post-exposure prophylaxis combines human rabies immunoglobulin and inactivated rabies virus vaccine. The quest for the next generation of vaccines explores genetically modified and viral vector-based approaches; emerging treatments include gene therapy, virus-like particles, and monoclonal antibodies, offering hope for improved outcomes. Economic barriers to post-exposure prophylaxis, limited education, and awareness challenge rabies control. Cost-effective solutions and comprehensive awareness campaigns are vital for the successful eradication of rabies. More research and collaborative endeavors remain pivotal in the ongoing journey to eradicate rabies, one of the deadliest infectious diseases known to humans, if not met with prophylactic measures.

20.
Vaccine ; 42(22): 126018, 2024 Sep 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834432

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: SYN023 is an anti-rabies monoclonal antibody mixture administered as part of post-exposure prophylaxis regimens. The rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA) concentration generally accepted as an adequate immune response to vaccination is ≥ 0.5 IU/mL. METHODS: Within 54 h of potential rabies exposure, 448 patients in two risk substrata of WHO Category III exposure were randomized to receive either 0.3 mg/kg SYN023 or 0.133 mL/kg human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG) injected in and around the wound site(s) plus a course of rabies vaccination. Patients were followed for safety and absence of rabies for ≥ 365 days. RESULTS: GMT RVNA was higher with SYN023 throughout the 2-week post-treatment period. In the primary analysis group (n = 368), 99.4 % of SYN023 recipients versus 4.5 % of HRIG recipients had protective RVNA levels on Day 4. On Day 8, 98.1 % SYN023 versus 12.2 % HRIG recipients were protected. The SYN023:HRIG ratio of geometric mean titer of RVNA (RVNA GMTs) on Day 8 (19.42) exceeded the 10 % superiority margin (P < 0.0001) indicating higher Day 8 RVNA with SYN023. On Day 99, the SYN023:HRIG RVNA GMT ratio (0.66) was below the non-inferiority margin of 20 % (P = 0.9485) suggesting some moderation of vaccine immune response by SYN023 relative to HRIG. The ratio of percent SYN023:HRIG recipients achieving RVNA ≥ 0.5 IU/mL on Day 99 (0.98) met the non-inferiority margin of 20 % (P = 0.013) indicating anti-rabies immune response with SYN023 was non-inferior to HRIG despite this effect. There were no probable/confirmed rabies cases in any patient. Study regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: SYN023 provided higher RVNA than HRIG soon after rabies exposure. By Day 99 post-treatment, GM RVNA with SYN023 was lower than HRIG, however, the percent of SYN023 recipients with a protective response was not inferior at this time point. No rabies cases were reported in the study. The SYN023 safety profile was acceptable. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ID: NCT03961555.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição , Vacina Antirrábica , Vírus da Raiva , Raiva , Humanos , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Raiva/imunologia , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , Método Duplo-Cego , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Vírus da Raiva/imunologia , Vacina Antirrábica/imunologia , Vacina Antirrábica/efeitos adversos , Vacina Antirrábica/administração & dosagem , Vacina Antirrábica/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Criança
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA