Targeted use of postoperative discharge phone calls to reduce early readmission rates.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative readmissions are common and costly. Office-initiated phone calls to patients shortly after discharge may identify concerns and allow for early intervention to prevent readmission. We sought to evaluate our 30-day readmission rate after the implementation of a standardized postoperative discharge phone call (PODPC) intervention, compared with a historical aggregated cohort. METHODS: From July 2020 to 21, postoperative patients were prospectively identified at 48 hour after discharge. Medical assistants performed PODPCs, administering a survey designed to identify medical/surgical issues that could signify a complication and warrant escalation to a nurse practitioner (NP) for further management. Demographics, comorbidities, and procedure type were obtained retrospectively. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate PODPC responses, frequency of escalation, readmission, and reasons. The electronic medical record identified a historical aggregated cohort (July 2018 to 2019) and the 30-day readmission rate. A χ2 analysis was used to compare readmission rates between the preintervention historical and PODPC intervention groups. Predictors of 30-day readmission were modeled with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 411 PODPCs conducted, 106 patients (26%) reported not feeling well; having concerns. Eighty-four PODPCs (20%) triggered escalation to a NP; of these, 60 patients (71%) were counseled over the phone by an NP, 16 (19%) were brought into clinic, 6 (7%) were sent to the emergency department, and 2 (2%) did not answer the NP call. Of 411 patients, 17% (n = 68) were readmitted within 30 days. Comparatively, the historical aggregated cohort readmission rate was significantly higher at 28% (n = 346; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-3.65; P = .046), and feeling run down; having difficulty with movement; needing assistance for most activities (OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 2.09-7.43; P < .0001) were predictive of 30-day readmission when controlling for procedure type. CONCLUSIONS: Although readmissions remained common (>15%), being in the intervention cohort was associated with a significantly lower readmission rate compared with the historical aggregated cohort. One-fifth of PODPCs identified a concern; however, >90% of these could be managed by an NP by phone or in clinic. This PODPC intervention holds promise as a viable mechanism for decreasing readmissions.

Racial Disparities in 30-day Readmissions after Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders (NHPI) patients with head and neck cancer are often aggregated with Asian individuals despite evidence of heterogeneous health outcomes and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the association of race with unplanned 30-day hospital readmission rate after head and neck surgery across the five federally recognized racial categories. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used a national hospital-based database and included patients ≥18 years old with diagnostically confirmed, nonmetastatic head and neck cancer of any subsite treated surgically between 2004 and 2017. The primary endpoint was unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge after primary surgery. RESULTS: A total of 365,834 patients were included who were predominantly White (87%), treated at academic cancer centers (47%), lower income (63%), with early-stage disease (60%), and with thyroid (47%) or oral cavity (23%) cancers. Median follow-up duration was 47 months. Of the 10,717 (3%) readmissions, 5,845 (1.6%) were unplanned. Adjusted for confounders and compared with White patients, NHPI patients had the highest likelihood of unplanned (aOR 2.07, 95%CI 1.16-3.40, p = 0.008) readmissions. Within the NHPI group, patients with lower income (aOR 4.27, 95%CI 1.28-20.4, p = 0.035) and those residing in an urban or rural area (aOR 7.42, 95%CI 1.14-49.5, p = 0.034) were more likely to be readmitted. CONCLUSIONS: NHPI patients with head and neck cancers experience significantly higher 30-day readmissions following definitive surgical treatment. These results highlight the importance of racial disaggregation in clinical studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:1282-1287, 2024.

Decreases in daily ambulation forecast post-surgical re-admission.

BACKGROUND: Surgical readmissions are clinically and financially problematic. Our purpose is to determine if a decrease in postoperative ambulation (steps/day) is associated with hospital readmission. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, patients undergoing elective operations wore an accelerometer activity tracker to measure steps/day for 28 consecutive postoperative days. The primary outcome was hospital readmission. The change in steps/day over two consecutive days prior to the day of the readmission were examined. Predetermined thresholds for decreases of consecutive daily ambulation levels were used to calculate sensitivity and specificity for the outcome of hospital readmission. RESULTS: 215 patients (aged 63 ± 12 years) were included. Readmission occurred in 10% (n = 21). For each of the first 28-postoperative days, the entire cohort had an average daily step increase of 136 ± 146 steps/day (Spearman correlation rho = 0.990; p < 0.001). A decrease in steps for two consecutive days of >50% from the prior day had a 79% sensitivity and 90% specificity for hospital readmission. CONCLUSIONS: A decrease of >50% daily ambulation (steps/day) over two consecutive post-discharge days accurately forecasts hospital readmission. The implications of these findings are that monitoring daily ambulation could serve as a form of outpatient telemetry aiding to forecast post-surgical readmissions.

Postoperative 30-day emergency department utilization after 7294 cranial neurosurgery procedures at a tertiary neuroscience center.

OBJECTIVE: Hospital readmission and the reduction thereof has become a major quality improvement initiative in organized medicine and neurosurgery. However, little research has been performed on why neurosurgical patients utilize hospital emergency rooms (ERs) with or without subsequent admission in the postoperative setting. METHODS: This study was a retrospective, single-center review of data for all surgical cranial procedures performed from July 2013 to July 2016 in patients who survived to discharge. The study was approved by the institutional review board of the participating medical center. RESULTS: The authors identified 7294 cranial procedures performed during 6596 hospital encounters in 5385 patients. The rate of postoperative ER utilization within 30 days after surgical hospitalization across all procedure types was 13.1 per 100 surgeries performed. The two most common chief complaints were pain (30.7%) and medical complication (18.2%). After identification of relevant surgical and patient factors with univariable analysis, a multivariable backward elimination logistic regression model was constructed in which Ommaya reservoir placement (OR 2.65, p = 0.0008) and cranial CSF shunt placement (OR 1.40, p = 0.0001) were associated with increased ER utilization. Deep brain stimulation electrode placement (OR 0.488, p = 0.0004), increasing hospital length of stay (OR 0.935, p < 0.0001), and increasing patient age (OR 0.988, p < 0.0001) were associated with lower rates of postoperative ER utilization. One-half (50%) of ER visit patients were readmitted to the hospital. New/worsening neurological deficit chief complaint (OR 1.99, p = 0.0088), fever chief complaint (OR 2.41, p = 0.0205), altered mentation chief complaint (OR 2.71, p = 0.0002), patient chronic kidney disease (OR 3.31, p = 0.0037), brain biopsy procedure type (OR 3.50, p = 0.0398), and wound infection chief complaint (OR 31.4, p = 0.0008) were associated with increased rates of readmission to the hospital from the ER in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The authors report the rates of and reasons for ER utilization in a large cohort of postoperative cranial neurosurgical patients. Factors identified were associated with both increased and decreased use of the ER after cranial surgery, as well as variables associated with readmission to the hospital after postoperative ER visitation. These findings may direct future quality improvement via prospective implementation of care pathways for high-risk procedures.

Impact of the integrated comprehensive care program post-thoracic surgery: A propensity score-matched study.

OBJECTIVE: Thoracic surgery is associated with significant rates of postoperative morbidity and postdischarge return to the hospital or emergency department (ED). This study aims to assess the impact of a novel integrated patient-centered, hospital-based multidisciplinary community program (Integrated Comprehensive Care [ICC]) on postdischarge outcomes in patients undergoing thoracic surgery compared to routine care. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent surgical resection for lung malignancies at a tertiary care center from 2010 to 2014. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on their enrollment in the ICC program (intervention cohort; 2012-2014) or routine postoperative care (control cohort; 2010-2012). Propensity score matching was performed to match the 2 cohorts. The impact of the ICC program on postoperative length of stay (LOS), rate of ED visits, readmissions, and mortality within the first 60 days was assessed. RESULTS: Of the 1288 patients included in this study, 658 (51.1%) were male patients with mean age of 64 years (standard deviation 14.1 years). After propensity score matching, 478 patients were enrolled in the ICC cohort and 592 were enrolled as controls. The ICC cohort had significantly shorter LOS (4 days, vs 5 days in controls, P = .001), lower rate of 60-day ED visits (9.8% vs 28.4% in controls, P < .001), and readmissions (6.9% vs 8.6% in controls, P < .001). The 60-day mortality was also significantly lower in the ICC cohort compared with the control group (0.6% vs 0.8% in controls, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The ICC program is associated with shorter LOS, fewer ED visits and readmissions after discharge, and ultimately may decrease postoperative mortality.

Return to emergency department after pediatric urology procedures.

BACKGROUND: Unplanned postoperative return visits to the emergency department (ED) and readmission represent a quality bench outcome and pose a considerable cost burden to health-care systems. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate ED return visits after pediatric urology procedures in a tertiary care children's hospital, trying to identify potential causes. This may constitute a platform for future improvement areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Quality Board-approved retrospective study was performed identifying all urologic cases completed between October 2012 and September 2015. Baseline demographics, American Society of Anesthesia class, operating surgeon, type of admission, type and duration of surgical procedure, and type of anesthesia given were evaluated. Patients who returned to the ED within 30 days of the surgery date were identified. The ED records were reviewed for time of return, etiology for visit, and management received. Univariate and subsequent multivariate logistic regression statistical analyses were performed to identify variables associated with ED return. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were generated to determine the significance of relationships. RESULTS: Total of 4125 cases was identified. Median age was 32.9 months, with 85.1% of them being male. 349 (8.5%) cases returned to the ED within 30 days of the surgery. The majority of the returned patients, 295 (84.5%), managed conservatively with medications or reassurance, whereas 54 (15.5%) required readmission, and of those readmitted, 15 (4.3%) cases needed further surgical interventions, mainly urinary tract drainage procedures. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that the age, residence, admission type, inguinoscrotal surgery, and duration of surgical procedure were significantly associated with ED return (Table). The most common reason for the ED visit was UTI in 17.2%, followed by stent and catheter issues in 14.3%, wound-related in 14.3%, and bleeding in 11.7%. DISCUSSION: Pediatric literature show varying rates of ED return ranging from 2.4% to 2.6% after urologic procedures. Our return to ED rate exceeds that found in US studies, which can perhaps be attributed to the differences between the Canadian and US health-care systems. As found with other studies, age, inpatient admission, procedure type, and increased operative time were related to ED returns, possibly because of the difficulty of young children expressing themselves and the presumed complex nature of longer operations that mostly need inpatient admission. The most common reason for ED return in this study as in others was presumptive UTI. A known limitation of this study is its retrospective nature, along with the possible missed visits of patients who presented to outside hospitals. CONCLUSION: We present an account of the status of ED return visits after pediatric urology procedures in our institute. The majority of ED returns can be managed conservatively and are probably preventable.

Secondary surgical-site infection after coronary artery bypass grafting: A multi-institutional prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze patient risk factors and processes of care associated with secondary surgical-site infection (SSI) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: Data were collected prospectively between February and October 2010 for consenting adult patients undergoing CABG with saphenous vein graft (SVG) conduits. Patients who developed a deep or superficial SSI of the leg or groin within 65 days of CABG were compared with those who did not develop a secondary SSI. RESULTS: Among 2174 patients identified, 65 (3.0%) developed a secondary SSI. Median time to diagnosis was 16 days (interquartile range 11-29) with the majority (86%) diagnosed after discharge. Gram-positive bacteria were most common. Readmission was more common in patients with a secondary SSI (34% vs 17%, P < .01). After adjustment, an open SVG harvest approach was associated with an increased risk of secondary SSI (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-3.48). Increased body mass index (adjusted HR, 1.08, 95% CI, 1.04-1.12) and packed red blood cell transfusions (adjusted HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05-1.22) were associated with a greater risk of secondary SSI. Antibiotic type, antibiotic duration, and postoperative hyperglycemia were not associated with risk of secondary SSI. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary SSI after CABG continues to be an important source of morbidity. This serious complication often occurs after discharge and is associated with open SVG harvesting, larger body mass, and blood transfusions. Patients with a secondary SSI have longer lengths of stay and are readmitted more frequently.

Hospital readmission after ovarian cancer surgery: Are we measuring surgical quality?

OBJECTIVES: Readmission after surgery is a quality metric hypothesized to reflect the quality of care in the index hospitalization. We examined the link between readmissions and a surrogate of surgical quality - major postoperative complication - among ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for ovarian cancer between 2012 and 2013 were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP). Major complications were defined as grade 3 or ≥complications on the validated Claviden-Dindo scale and included both NSQIP and non-NSQIP defined complications based on readmission ICD-9 code. Readmissions and complications within 30-days of surgery were analyzed using rate ratios and modified Poisson regression. RESULTS: We identified 2806 ovarian cancer patients of whom 9.1% (n=259) experienced an unplanned readmission. Overall major complication rate was 10.9% (n=307). Major complications in the index hospitalization were not associated with subsequent readmission (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.7-1.9). Overall, 41.4% of readmissions were not attributable to any major postoperative complication. Of the unplanned readmissions, 55.2% (n=143) never experienced a NSQIP-defined major complication. Of these 143 patients, the reason for readmission was known for 107 patients and was: 28.0% non-NSQIP-defined major complications; 16.8% cancer or other medical factors; 22.4% minor complications; and 32.7% symptoms without a diagnosis of complication. CONCLUSIONS: Forty percent of unplanned readmissions after ovarian cancer surgery occur among patients who have not experienced a major postoperative complication. Quality metric benchmarks and efforts to decrease readmissions should account for this high percentage of readmissions not associated with a major complication.

Readmission predicts 90-day mortality after esophagectomy: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry linked to Medicare outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative readmission is an increasingly scrutinized quality metric that affects patient satisfaction and cost. Even more important is its implication for short-term prognosis. The purpose of this study is to characterize postesophagectomy readmissions and determine their relationship with subsequent 90-day mortality. METHODS: Data were extracted for esophagectomy patients from the linked SEER-Medicare Registry (2000-2009), which provides longitudinal information about Medicare beneficiaries who have cancer. We assessed demographics, comorbidities, 30-day readmission, and 90-day mortality. Readmitting facility and diagnoses were identified. A hierarchic multivariable regression model clustered at the hospital level assessed the relationship between readmission within 30 days of discharge and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: We identified 1543 patients discharged alive after esophagectomy. Among patients discharged alive, the readmission rate was 319 of 1543 (20.7%); 107 of 319 (33.5%) readmissions were to facilities that did not perform the index operation. Mortality rate at 90 days among patients discharged alive was 98 of 1543 (6.4%). Readmission was associated with a 4-fold increase in mortality (16.3% vs 3.8%, P < .001). Using multivariable regression, readmission was the strongest predictor of mortality (odds ratio 6.64, P < .001), with a stronger association than age, Charlson score, and index length of stay. Readmission diagnoses with the highest mortality rates were those associated with pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Patients readmitted within 30 days of discharge after esophagectomy are at exceptionally high risk for early mortality. Early recognition of life-threatening readmission diagnoses is essential to providing optimal care.

Postdischarge complications are an important predictor of postoperative readmissions.

BACKGROUND: Thirty-day readmissions are common in general surgery patients and affect long-term outcomes including mortality. We sought to determine the effect of complication timing on postoperative readmissions. METHODS: Patients from our institutional American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database who underwent general surgery procedures from 2006 to 2011 were included. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day hospital readmission. RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with postdischarge complications were significantly more likely to be readmitted (56%) compared with patients diagnosed with complications before discharge (7%, P < .001). Independent predictors of postdischarge complications included laparoscopic case, short hospital stay, preoperative dyspnea, and independent functional status. Gastrointestinal complications and surgical site infection were the most common reasons for readmission. CONCLUSIONS: The development of complications after hospital discharge places patients at significant risk for readmission. Early identification and treatment of gastrointestinal complications and surgical site infections in the outpatient setting may decrease postoperative readmission rates.