Trends in Medicare Utilization and Reimbursement of Tracheostomy From 2000 to 2022.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the utilization and reimbursement for tracheostomy. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. SETTING: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2013 and 2021) and Part B Medicare Fee-For-Service National Summary Data (2000-2022). METHODS: Utilization, payment, and specialty breakdown were analyzed for planned tracheostomy (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] codes 31600, 31601, 31610) and emergency tracheostomy (CPT codes 31603, 31605). RESULTS: From 2000 to 2022, there was a 48.9% decrease (40,754-20,812) in number of planned tracheostomies and a 75.3% decrease (3277-811) in number of emergency tracheostomies, leading to an overall decrease of 51%. Similarly, there was a 59.3% inflation-adjusted decrease ($13.4-$5.5 million) in total reimbursement for planned tracheostomies and an 82.1% inflation-adjusted decrease ($1.1 million-$205 thousand) in total reimbursement for emergency tracheostomies. There was a 20.3% inflation-adjusted decrease ($329-$262) in reimbursement per planned tracheostomy and a 27.7% inflation-adjusted decrease ($349-$252) in reimbursement per emergency tracheostomy. In our sample of 280 high-volume tracheostomy providers in 2021 (28.2% otolaryngology, 28.2% general surgery, 14.6% thoracic surgery, 14.3% pulmonary disease, 6.4% critical care), the average provider performed 15.8 tracheostomies and was reimbursed $5362. CONCLUSION: Despite significant declines in tracheostomy utilization and reimbursement, understanding trends for these lifesaving procedures are critical for otolaryngologists and other providers in delivering high-quality care, and can be used by surgeons, hospital systems, and policymakers to guide future health care legislation.

Evaluating the Effect of Financial Penalty on Hospital-Acquired Infections.

Purpose: This study explores the effects of CMS reimbursement financial penalties from the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) on hospital-acquired infections (HAI) in hospitals across the United States. Methods: Hospital-level data for 2896 hospitals in the United States were evaluated using multiple linear regression models with random effects analysis through a difference-in-differences study design to examine HAIs under the HACRP between hospitals that were financially penalized or not from calendar years 2013 to 2020. Results: This study showed significant differences from the pre-program Total HAC scores to the most recent reviewed year, validating the efficacy of the HACRP, and showing a reduction of overall HAIs over the years evaluated in the study. The multiple linear regression model with random effects analysis produced a significant (p < 0.001) interaction term between hospitals expected to be penalized in 2013 and each year evaluated in the study (-0.412 estimate) confirming decreases in HAI scores, and overall decreases in HAIs across the years of the study. Notably, 98% of hospitals in the worst-performing, expected to be financially penalized quartile from 2013, were found to have decreased their HAIs in their facilities, while only 38.8% of hospital in the performing, non-penalized quartiles showed decreases in HAIs across their facilities, by 2020. Conclusion: Our research indicates that implementing financial disincentives through reimbursement reductions could potentially decrease the incidence of HAIs. Our study further suggests that incorporating financial penalties and incentives for HAIs annually across all hospitals may lead to significant reductions in HAIs throughout the US healthcare system.

The Impact of Code Bundling on Medicare Volume and Reimbursements Within Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

In 2018, Medicare introduced new codes to the Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) and balloon sinus dilation (BSD) families of Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Using the Medicare Part B National Summary Data File from 2010 to 2022, an interrupted time-series analysis examined trends in volume and reimbursements before and after 2018. Prior to 2018, volume and reimbursements for FESS grew at a mean rate of 2.5% ± 2.2% per year and 6.9% ± 6.6% per year, respectively, before reimbursements decreased significantly in 2018 by -13.9% (P = .014), leading to a stabilization of volume (growth of 0.72%, P = .602). Volume and reimbursements for BSD saw rapid growth from 2011 to 2015 which plateaued prior to the introduction of bundled codes and did not appear to change significantly in 2018 (-0.6%, P = .306 and 11.9%, P = .392, respectively). In addition to concurrent devaluation of FESS and BSD codes, bundling appears to have further contributed to falling reimbursements in rhinology.

"When selling anything to an audience, visible publicity is key:" experiences, barriers, and enablers to participate in a COVID-19 study in Malawi.

BACKGROUND: Many studies in infectious diseases struggle to recruit participants. The SARS-CoV-2 infection, transmission dynamics, and household impact in Malawi (SCATHIM) study reported a refusal rate of 57.2%. Adequate publicity can lead to more people participating in studies. This study explored the reasons for participating in the SCATHIM study. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study informed by the theory of reasoned action was conducted in Blantyre between January 2022 and March 2022 to assess factors that influence participation in a COVID-19 study among 10 index cases, 10 caregivers, 10 study decliners, and 5 research staff. The data were collected via in-depth interview guides, audio recorded, transcribed, managed via NVIVO and analysed via a thematic approach. RESULTS: The factors that motivated participation in the study included one's knowledge of COVID-19; potential access to medical services, including free COVID-19 tests for members of the household; financial reimbursements; and the ability to contribute scientific knowledge. The barriers to participation included minimal publicity of the study amidst a novel condition, perceived stigma and discrimination, perceived invasion of privacy, discomfort with the testing procedures, and suboptimal financial reimbursements. CONCLUSION: Effective publicity and outreach strategies have the potential to decrease refusal rates in study participation, especially if a condition is novel. Studies on infectious diseases should address stigma and discrimination to promote participation and ensure participant safety.

Trends in Emergency Department Exam Medicare Reimbursements Between 2010 and 2018.

BACKGROUND: As the Medicare population continues to grow, financial pressure is placed upon hospitals, physicians, and other providers as the payer mix has an increasing proportion of Medicare patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to further the understanding of reimbursement trends surrounding the five levels of emergency department (ED) examinations (CPT codes 99281-99285) from 2010 to 2018 and determine how they have changed with respect to each procedure. METHODS: CPT codes were filtered into the 2010 and 2018 Physician/Supplier Procedure Summaries from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' website to gather data on emergency physician submissions and Medicare denials and payments. RESULTS: In 2010, 15,669,196 ED examinations were submitted to Medicare for $7,628,693,382 while in 2018, 16,432,184 ED examinations were submitted for $14,522,456,383. Despite an increase of $397/submission made by emergency physicians, Medicare paid 20.5% of the submitted charges in 2010 for ED examinations and 11.9% in 2018. The denial rate in 2018 was highest for level I ED examinations (11.3%), and the lowest for level V examinations (5.1%). The utilization of level V ED examinations increased 22.3% from 2010 to 2018, while the utilization of the others decreased. Of the five levels of ED examinations, only the level I examination did not exhibit a decrease. CONCLUSIONS: From 2010 to 2018, emergency physicians charged a higher amount for ED examinations, yet Medicare reimbursement accounted for a smaller proportion of these charges, resulting in less payment per submission for the four most common levels. Downward trends in Medicare reimbursement may place financial burdens that could potentially hamper healthcare outcomes.

Trends in Medicare Reimbursements for Commonly Performed Laryngeal Procedures from 2000 to 2021.

OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies among different specialties have suggested that inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursements have steadily declined in the last few decades. The objective of this study is to investigate whether this is true within the field of laryngology. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. SETTING: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician Fee Schedule. METHODS: 2000-2021 fees for laryngeal surgeries (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] codes 31530, 31531, 31535, 31536, 31540, 31541, 31545, 31546, 31551-31554, 31560, 31561, 31570), and laryngectomies (CPTs 31360, 31365, 31367, 31368, 31370, 31375, 31380, 31382, 31390, 31395) were gathered. United States consumer price index (CPI) was used to adjust all gathered data for inflation to 2021 US dollars. RESULTS: During the study period, unadjusted reimbursement for non-facility and facility laryngeal surgeries decreased an average of 6.1% and 6.6%, respectively. When adjusting for inflation, non-facility and facility laryngeal surgeries saw an average decrease of 17.8% (p < 0.001) and 28.5% (p < 0.001), respectively. Unadjusted reimbursement for facility laryngectomies saw an average increase of 40.2%, correlating to an inflation-adjusted decline of 8.9% (p < 0.001). Among laryngeal procedures overall, there was an average nominal increase of 17.0%, correlating to a 20.3% inflation-adjusted decline. CONCLUSION: In terms of inflation-adjusted dollars, reimbursements for laryngeal procedures have seen a large decrease in the last two decades. Understanding reimbursement trends is critical for sustainability of otolaryngology practices, and can be used by surgeons, hospital systems, and policymakers to guide future healthcare legislation.

Incidence and Reimbursement Trends for Facial Fracture Repair in the Elderly: A Medicare Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to describe incidence and reimbursement trends of surgical repair of facial fractures among the Medicare population. METHODS: The annual procedure data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service National Part B Data File from 2000 to 2019 were queried. RESULTS: The total number of surgically corrected facial fractures increased from 10,148 in 2000 to 19,631 in 2019 in a linear pattern (r = 0.924). Specifically, nasal bone/septum fracture repairs increased the most by 200.6% (n = 4682 to n = 14,075), whereas operations for TMJ dislocations, malar/zygoma fractures, and alveolar ridge/mandibular fractures decreased by 27.9%, 12.3%, and 3.2%, respectively, between 2000 and 2019. Correspondingly, the total Medicare reimbursement rose from $2,574,317 in 2000 to $4,129,448 in 2019 (r = 0.895). However, the mean reimbursement for all procedures decreased from $376.63 to $210.35 (44.1% fall) over the same time after adjusting for inflation, with this trend holding for individual fracture types as well. CONCLUSIONS: Given the population's increasing age, there has been a significant increase in the number of surgical repairs of facial fractures in Medicare patients between 2000 and 2019. However, this is largely driven by an increase in nasal bone/septum closed reductions, with stagnant and, in some cases, declining incidence among other fracture repairs. The reason is unclear and may be related to an increase in nonoperative management or poor outcomes. Nevertheless, like other subfields within otolaryngology and medicine at large, payments have lagged far behind, which may play some role. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:659-665, 2024.

Trends in Costs and Professional Reimbursements for Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: With increasing numbers of revision total hip and total knee arthroplasties (rTHAs and rTKAs), understanding trends in related out-of-pocket (OOP) costs, overall costs, and provider reimbursements is critical to improve patient access to care. METHODS: A large database was used to identify 92,116 patients who underwent rTHA or rTKA between 2009 and 2018. The OOP costs associated with the surgery and related inpatient care were calculated as the sum of copayment, coinsurance, and deductible payments. Professional reimbursement was calculated as total payments to the principal physician. All monetary data were adjusted to 2018 dollars. Multivariate regressions evaluated the associations between costs and procedure type, insurance type, and region of service. RESULTS: From 2009 to 2018, overall costs for rTHA significantly increased by 35.0% and overall costs for rTKA significantly increased by 32.3%. The OOP costs for rTHA had no significant changes, while OOP costs for rTKA increased by 20.1%, with patients on Medicare plans having the lowest OOP costs. Professional reimbursements, when measured as a percentage of overall costs, decreased significantly by 4.4% for rTHA and 4.0% for rTKA, with the lowest reimbursements from Medicare plans. CONCLUSION: From 2009 to 2018, total costs related to rTHA and rTKA significantly increased. The OOP costs significantly increased for rTKA, and professional reimbursements for both rTHA and rTKA decreased relative to total costs. Overall, these trends may combine to create greater financial burden to patients and the healthcare system, as well as further limit patients' access to revision arthroplasty care.

Trends in utilization of meniscal allograft transplantation between 2010 and 2019.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to observe the trends in (1) utilization of meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT), (2) demographics and comorbidities of patients undergoing transplants and (3) reimbursements for this procedure between the years of 2010 and 2019. METHODS: Using a national database, patients who underwent MAT were observed. Incidence of MAT, percentage of female patients, average age, and average Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were analyzed between 2010 and 2019. Average reimbursement during the index and postoperative 90-day bundle period were also calculated from 2010 to 2019. Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of change in incidence, demographic and reimbursement was calculated, and linear regressionwas conducted for each trends analysis. RESULTS: In total, 744 patients underwent a MAT between the years of 2010 and 2019. The incidence of MAT increased from 0.12 per 100,000 to 0.15 per 100,000 during this period but was not statistically significant (p=0.345). There was no significant difference in age (p=0.462) and gender (p=0.831) among the patients, but the average CCI significantly increased from 2010 to 2019 (CAGR: +15.30; p=0.001). The total reimbursement in the index (p=0.451) and 90-day bundle period (p=0.191) did not significantly change from 2010 to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Although MAT has been shown to be a safe and reliable surgery for the treatment of meniscus deficient knees, the incidence of MAT as well as the population undergoing MAT has minimally increased from 2010 to 2019. Future studies should seek to identify why the utilization of this efficacious surgery has not increased. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; Descriptive Epidemiology Study.

Cost-effectiveness thresholds or decision-making threshold: a novel perspective.

The use of multiple cost-effectiveness thresholds in pharmacoeconomic evaluation is a hotly debated topic in the international academic community. This study analyzed and discussed thresholds in the context of pharmacoeconomic evaluation and reimbursement decision-making. We suggest that the thresholds inferred from reimbursement decisions should be distinguished from cost-effectiveness threshold in pharmacoeconomic evaluation. Pharmacoeconomic evaluations should adopt a fixed threshold, which should not vary with the subjects evaluated. This would help avoid the invitation of numerous cost-effectiveness thresholds for a specific drug, an exceptional disease, a type of innovation, or a certain level of malignancy, which misleads economic evaluation adopting restless changing standards and making pharmacoeconomic evaluation and decision-making more complex and contradictory.

Are Foot & Ankle Surgeons Being Adequately Compensated for Ankle Fractures? - An Analysis of Relative Value Units.

The current relative value units (RVU)-based system is built to reflect the varying presentation of ankle fractures (uni-malleolar vs bi-malleolar vs tri-malleolar) by assigning individual RVUs to different fracture complexities. However, no study has evaluated whether the current RVUs reflect an appropriate compensation per unit time following open reduction internal fixation for uni-malleolar versus bi-malleolar versus tri-malleolar ankle fractures. The 2012 to 2017 American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program files were queried using current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation for uni-malleolar (CPT-27766,CPT-27769,CPT-27792), bi-malleolar (CPT-27814), and tri-malleolar (CPT-27822,CPT-27823) ankle fractures. A total of 7830 (37.2%) uni-malleolar, 7826 (37.2%) bi-malleolar and 5391 (25.6%) tri-malleolar ankle fractures were retrieved. Total RVUs, Mean RVU/minute and Reimbursement rate ($/min) and Mean Reimbursement/case for each fracture type were calculated and compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests. The mean total RVU for each fracture type was as follows: (1) Uni-malleolar: 9.99, (2) Bi-malleolar = 11.71 and 3) Tri-malleolar = 12.87 (p < .001). A statistically significant difference was noted in mean operative time (uni-malleolar = 63.2 vs bi-malleolar = 78.6 vs tri-malleolar = 95.5; p < .001) between the 3 groups. Reimbursement rates ($/min) decreased significantly as fracture complexity increased (uni-malleolar = $7.21/min vs bi-malleolar = $6.75/min vs tri-malleolar = $6.10; p < .001). The average reimbursement/case was $358, $420, and $462 for uni-malleolar, bi-malleolar and tri-malleolar fractures respectively. Foot & ankle surgeons are reimbursed at a higher rate ($/min) for treating a simple uni-malleolar fracture as compared to bi-malleolar and tri-malleolar fractures, despite the higher complexity and longer operative times seen in the latter. The study highlights the need of a change in the RVUs for bi-malleolar and tri-malleolar ankle fractures to ensure that surgeons are adequately reimbursed per unit time for treating a more complex fracture case.

Increasing medicare charge-to-payment ratios for dermatologists from 2012 to 2017.

Government-backed medical insurance plans have undergone significant changes in the last decade, but more information is needed to understand reimbursement trends, particularly for specialist medical services. The objective of this study was to identify the ratios of submitted dermatology service charges to allowed Medicare payments over the years. Further variables studied include regional or state variations, gender of provider, hierarchical condition category (HCC) risk scores of patient complexity, and number of services. Data were collected from publicly available Medicare Part B Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier 2012-2017 datasets. All data analysis was performed on SAS 9.4 Statistical Software.Total dermatology related medicare charges-to-payment ratios steadily increased over the years (1.77 [in 2012], 1.82 [2013], 1.87 [2014], 1.95 [2015], 2.02 [2016], and 2.06 [2017]). This suggests that for every $2.06 charged in 2017, dermatology providers could expect $1 of actual payment. When further stratified into medical services vs. drug services, this upward trend remained for medical charges but drug service ratios have remained constant. There was also significant geographic variation in total medicare charges-to-payment ratios as states in the Midwest (mean total ratio: 2.48) had higher charges to payment gaps than states in the Northeast (2.26), West (2.16), and South (1.99; p = 0.01).This study identifies trends and variables associated with dermatology medicare payments. Providers may use this information to better understand changing payment structures in their own practices and hopefully these results can be valuable in future policy discussions.

Patient-level payment patterns prior to single level lumbar decompression are associated with resource utilization, postoperative payments, and adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Understanding patient-specific trends in costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) surrounding lumbar spine surgery is critically needed to better inform surgical decision making and the development of targeted interventions. PURPOSE: 1) Identify subgroups of patients following distinct patterns in direct healthcare payments pre- and postoperatively, 2) determine whether these patterns are associated with patient and surgical factors, and 3) examine whether preoperative payment patterns are related to postoperative payments, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and adverse events. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database (IBM Marketscan Research Databases 2007-2015). PATIENT SAMPLE: Adults undergoing primary single-level decompression surgery for lumbar stenosis (n=12,394). OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct healthcare payments, HCRU payments (15 categories), 90-day complications and all-cause readmission, 2-year reoperation METHODS: Group-based trajectory modeling is an application of finite mixture modeling that is able to identify meaningful subgroups within a population that follow distinct developmental trajectories over time. We used this technique to identify subgroups of patients following distinct profiles in preoperative direct healthcare payments. A separate analysis was performed to identify distinct profiles in payments postoperatively. Patient and surgical factors associated with these payment profiles were assessed with multinomial logistic regression, and associations with adverse events were assessed with risk-adjusted multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 4 preoperative patient payment subgroups following distinct profiles in payments: Pre-Low (5.8% of patients), Pre-Early-Rising (4.8%), Pre-Medium (26.1%), and Pre-High (63.3%). Postoperatively, 3 patient subgroups were identified: Post-Low (8.9%), Post-Medium (29.6%), and Post-High (61.4%). Patients following the higher-cost pre- and postoperative payment profiles were older, more likely female, and had a greater physical and mental comorbidity burden. With each successively higher preoperative payment profile, patients were increasingly likely to have high postoperative payments, use more HCRU (particularly high-cost services such as inpatient admissions, ER, and SNF/IRF care), and experience postoperative adverse events. Following risk adjustment for patient and surgical factors, patients following the Pre-High payment profile had 209.5 (95% CI: 144.2, 309.7; p<.001) fold greater odds for following the Post-High payment profile, 1.8 (1.3, 2.5; p=.003) fold greater odds for 90-day complications, and 1.7 (1.2, 2.6; p=.035) fold greater odds for 2-year reoperation relative to patients following the Pre-Low payment profile. CONCLUSIONS: There are identifiable subgroups of patients who follow distinct profiles in direct healthcare payments surrounding lumbar decompression surgery. These payment profiles are related to patient age, sex, and physical and mental comorbidities. Notably, preoperative payment profiles may provide prognostic value, as they are associated with postoperative costs, HCRU, and adverse events. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Sex-Based Differences in Medicare Reimbursements among Ophthalmologists Persist across Time.

PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in Medicare reimbursements between male and female ophthalmologists between 2013 and 2019. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Ophthalmologists receiving Medicare reimbursements between 2013 and 2019. METHODS: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File was used to determine total reimbursements and number of services submitted by ophthalmologists between 2013 and 2019. Reimbursements were standardized to account for geographic differences in Medicare reimbursement per service. Data from the American Community Survey (ACS) were used to determine socioeconomic characteristics (unemployment, poverty, income, and education) by zip code for the location of each physician's practice. A multivariate linear regression model was used to evaluate differences in annual reimbursements by sex, accounting for calendar year, years of experience, total number of services, ACS zip code data, and proportion of procedural services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual Medicare reimbursement and use of billing codes (e.g., outpatient office visits and eye examinations, diagnostic testing, laser treatment, and surgery). RESULTS: Among 20 281 ophthalmologists who received Medicare reimbursements between 2013 and 2019, 15 451 (76%) were men. The most common billing codes submitted were for outpatient visits and eye examinations (13.8 million charges/year), diagnostic imaging of the retina (5.6 million charges/year), intravitreal injections (2.9 million charges/year), and removal of cataract with insertion of lens (2.4 million charges/year). Compared with men, female ophthalmologists received less in median annual reimbursements (median, $94 734.21 [interquartile range (IQR), $30 944.52-$195 701.70] for women vs. $194 176.90 [IQR, $76 380.76-$355 790.80] for men; P < 0.001) and billed for fewer annual median services (median, 1228 [IQR, 454-2433] vs. 2259 [IQR, 996-4075, respectively]; P < 0.001). After adjustment for covariates, female ophthalmologists billed for 1015 fewer services (95% confidence interval [CI], 1001-1029; P < 0.001) and received $20 209.12 less in reimbursements than men (95% CI, -$21 717.57 to -$18 700.66; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Female ophthalmologists billed for fewer services and received less in reimbursement from Medicare than men over time and across all categories of billing codes. Disparities persisted after controlling for physician and practice characteristics.

Healthcare resource utilization and costs 2 years pre- and post-lumbar spine surgery for stenosis: a national claims cohort study of 22,182 cases.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Improved understanding of the pre- and postoperative trends in costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) is needed to better inform patient expectations and aid in the development of strategies to minimize the significant healthcare burden associated with lumbar spine surgery. PURPOSE: Examine the time course of costs and HCRU in the 2 years preceding and following elective lumbar spine surgery for stenosis in a large national claims cohort. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective analysis of an administrative claims database (IBM® Marketscan® Research Databases 2007-2015). PATIENT SAMPLE: Adult patients undergoing elective primary single-level lumbar surgery for stenosis with at least 2 years of continuous health plan enrollment pre- and postoperatively. OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional measures, including monthly rates of HCRU (15 categories), monthly gross covered payments (including payments made by the health plan and deductibles and coinsurance paid by the patient) overall, by HCRU category, and by spine versus non-spine-related. METHODS: All available patients were utilized for analysis of HCRU. For analysis of payments, only patients on noncapitated health plans providing accurate financial information were analyzed. Payments were converted to 2015 United States dollars using the medical care component of the consumer price index. Trends in payments and HCRU were plotted on a monthly basis pre- and post-surgery and assessed with regression models. Relationships with demographics, surgical factors, and comorbidities were assessed with multivariable repeated measures generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Median monthly healthcare payments 2 years prior to surgery were $275 ($22, $868). Baseline HCRU at 2 years preoperatively was stable or only gradually rising (office visits, prescription drug use), but began an increasingly steep rise in many categories 6 to 12 months prior to surgery. Monthly payments began an increasingly steep rise 6 months prior to surgery, reaching a peak of $1,402 ($634, $2,827) in the month prior to surgery. This was driven by an increase in radiology, office visits, PT, injections, prescription medications, ER encounters, and inpatient admissions. Payments dropped dramatically immediately following surgery. Over the remainder of the 2 years, the median total payments declined only slightly, as a continued decline in spine-related payments was offset by gradually increased non-spine related payments as patients aged. By 2 years postoperatively, the percentage of patients using PT and injections returned to within 1% of the baseline levels observed 2 years preoperatively; however, spine-related prescription medication use remained elevated, as did other categories of HCRU (radiology, office visits, lab/diagnostic services, and also rare events such as inpatient admissions, ER encounters, and SNF/IRF). Patients with a fusion component to their surgeries had higher payments and HCRU preoperatively, and this did not resolve postoperatively. Variations in payments and HCRU were also evident among plan types, with patients on comprehensive medical plans-predominantly employer-sponsored supplemental Medicare coverage-utilizing more inpatient, ER, and inpatient rehabilitation & skilled nursing facilities. Patients on high-deductible plans had fewer payments and HCRU across all categories; however, we are unable to distinguish whether this is because they used fewer of these services or if they were paying for these services out of pocket without submitting to the payer. By 2 years postoperatively, 51% of patients had no spine-related monthly payments, while 33% had higher and 16% had lower monthly payments relative to 2 years preoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to characterize time trends in direct healthcare payments and HCRU over an extended period preceding and following spine surgery. Differences among plan types potentially highlight disparities in access to care and plan-related financial mediators of patients' healthcare resource utilization.

Pharmaceutical pricing dynamics in an internal reference pricing system: evidence from changing drugs' reimbursements.

Reference pricing systems for prescription drugs are usually implemented with the aim of curbing public expenditure with pharmaceuticals, induce drug substitution from branded to generic drugs, and enhance competition. In these systems, patients co-pay the difference between the drug's pharmacy retail price and the health system reimbursement level. Relying on a detailed product-level panel dataset of prescription drugs sold in Portuguese retail pharmacies, from 2016 to 2019, we evaluate pharmaceutical firms' pricing decisions for branded and generic drugs, as well as consumers' reaction to price changes. In particular, we exploit the variation induced by a policy change, which decreased reference prices for 36% of the drug groups in our sample. Results from difference-in-differences analyses show that, despite the reference price decrease, affected firms increased their prices-particularly for off-patent branded products. Such reaction from firms resulted in an increase in the co-payment paid by patients. Such price effects caused a 17% decline on branded drugs' consumption, with significant heterogeneity across therapeutics. Estimates suggest that NHS reimbursement savings were mainly achieved through higher co-payments paid by patients. Additionally, pharmaceutical firms' reaction to the reference price decrease was contrary to what was expected, suggesting underlying competitive dynamics which should be considered prior to policy changes.

Guideline compliance in bariatric surgery: a French nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Strict adherence to guidelines with a comprehensive preoperative assessment and rigorous follow-up are essential to improve postoperative and long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery (BS). OBJECTIVES: To investigate the trends in BS in France and to assess the compliance to guidelines in people with obesity before and after BS. SETTING: University Hospital of Bordeaux, France. METHODS: Data on patients who were admitted for a primary BS procedure in France between January 1 and April 1, 2014, were extracted from the French national health insurance system database. Data on patients' characteristics, preoperative assessment, hospitalization, and postoperative follow-up, including medical consultations, laboratory tests, and drug consumption, during the year preceding and the 2 years after BS were collected. RESULTS: Most of the 11,824 patients (60.4%) had sleeve gastrectomy. Rates of reimbursement for preoperative consultations with general practitioners, digestive surgeons, and endocrinologists or internists were 94.5%, 89.2%, and 63%, respectively. Laboratory tests for nutritional and obesity-related co-morbidity evaluations were performed in 94.3% and 91.4%, respectively. Rates of consultation with general practitioners, digestive surgeons, and endocrinologists or internists dropped from 93.1%, 91.2%, and 29.2%, respectively, the first year to 88.4%, 50.3%, and 20%, respectively, the second year after BS (P < .001). Reimbursements for vitamin, iron, and calcium supplementation dropped from 66.6%, 24.9%, and 21%, respectively, the first year to 52.1%, 19.3%, and 11.7%, respectively, the second year after BS (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Overall compliance with guidelines is improving. While preoperative medical assessment is nearly optimal, efforts still should be made in order to improve long-term follow-up in general and patient adherence to micronutrient supplementation in particular.

Rhinology Medicare reimbursements have not been keeping up with inflation.

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that physicians are steadily being paid less per Medicare service over time based on inflation-adjusted dollars. The objective of this study was to determine whether this phenomenon was true for rhinologic procedures. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of the 2000-2021 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician Fee Schedule investigating fees for in-office endoscopies (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] codes 31231-31238), in-office balloon ostial dilation (CPTs 31295-31298), in-facility low-relative value unit (RVU) surgeries (<10 work RVUs [wRVUs]; CPTs 31239-31288 and 61782), and in-facility high-RVU surgeries (>10 wRVUs; CPTs 31290-31294). Total number of and reimbursements for these services was obtained from yearly National Part B Summary Datafiles. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2021, adjusted reimbursements for low- and high-wRVU rhinologic surgeries decreased by 50.0% and 36.1%, respectively. The average compound annual growth rate (CAGR) decrease was 3.3% and 2.1%, respectively. Excluding a 48.3% unadjusted reimbursement increase between 2000 and 2004, endoscopies saw an adjusted reimbursement decrease of 29.4% from 2004 onward, an average CAGR of -2.1%. From 2011 onward, balloon ostial dilations saw a decrease in adjusted reimbursement of 43.8%, an average CAGR of -6.0%. Nevertheless, after inflation adjustment, National Part B data reveal that Medicare paid more, in total, for these procedures in 2019 than in 2000 due to increasing utilization. CONCLUSION: Medicare reimbursements are complex, adjusted yearly, and undergo constant federal scrutiny due to the increasing costs of health care. These results suggest that, in terms of real dollars, rhinologic procedures have seen a large gradual decrease in Medicare reimbursement, which is important information for policymakers and surgeons alike.

Characterizing Medicare Reimbursements and Clinical Activity Among Female Otolaryngologists.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate geographic and temporal trends in Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) billing and reimbursements across female otolaryngologists (ORL). METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of the 2017 Medicare Physician and Other Suppliers Aggregate File. We analyzed differences in the number of services, patients, reimbursements, unique Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes used, and services billed per patient among female ORLs. RESULTS: Female ORLs accounted for 15.2% of the 8453 Medicare-reimbursed ORLs. Female ORLs who graduated between 2000 and 2010 were reimbursed a median of $58 031.9 (IQR: $32 286.5-$91 512.2) and performed a median of 702 (IQR: 359.5-1221.5) services, significantly less than those who graduated between 1990 and 1999 (median: $67 508.9; IQR: 37 018.0-110 471.5; P < .001; median: 1055.5; IQR: 497.3-1944; P < .001). Female ORLs who graduated between 2000 and 2010 saw a median of 232 patients (IQR: 130.5-368), significantly less than those who graduated between 1990 and 1999 (median: 308; IQR: 168.3-496; P < .001) patients, significantly more than those. Female ORLs in urban settings performed a median of 795 (IQR: 364-1494.3) services and billed for a median of 42 (IQR: 28-58) unique codes, significantly fewer than their counterparts in rural settings (median: 1096; IQR: 600-2192.5; P = .002; median: 54; IQR: 31.5-64.5; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Medicare reimbursements and billing patterns across female ORLs varied by graduation decade and geography. Female ORLs further along in their careers may be reimbursed more with greater clinical volume and productivity. Those practicing in urban settings may have practices with decreased procedural diversity and lower clinical volume compared to their counterparts in rural areas.

Evaluating opportunities for improved outpatient satisfaction in an interventional spine clinic: An analysis of Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey responses.

Objective: The Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey (PGOMPS) is a frequently used patient satisfaction metric comprised of provider-specific and non-provider-specific questions. The PGOMPS results are used by many administrators to improve the patient experience and are linked to physician reimbursements in some cases. This study aimed to determine the frequency of patient satisfaction for the provider-specific and non-provider-specific PGOMPS questions and their association with the likelihood of a patient recommending their provider's clinic. Design: A retrospective review. Methods: Adult patients attending a university interventional spine clinic between January 2014 and December 2019 were included in this study. We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected patient satisfaction using PGOMPS. Data was collected within 30 days after an outpatient interventional spine clinic appointment. Satisfaction was defined as receiving a perfect total score. The frequency of perfect scores for each question was calculated. Chi-square (goodness-of-fit) analysis was performed between the number of patients who gave perfect satisfaction on all provider specific questions and the number of patients who gave perfect satisfaction for non-provider scores irrespective of their provider specific scoring. Spearman correlation between individual PGOMPS questions and the likelihood to recommend the practice question were calculated. Results: 53,118 patients patient encounters were included. 2078 (66.65%) provider-specific questions received perfect satisfaction versus 1121 (35.95%) with perfect satisfaction for non-provider specific questions (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). The five questions most likely to receive perfect satisfaction were: physician spoke using clear language (92.90%), physician friendliness/courtesy (82.74%), cleanliness of the practice (82.67%) likelihood to recommend practice (81.27%), and likelihood to recommend physician (80.96%). The 5 least likely were: convenience of office hours (64.30%), wait time (63.00%), ease of getting on phone (60.77%), information about delays (60.19%), and ability to get desired appointment (58.92%). Of the 10 questions that had the strongest correlation with likelihood to recommend the practice 7 were related to the physician. None of the 10 questions with the least correlation were related to the physician. Conclusions: Most interventional spine patients are satisfied with their providers and less satisfied with non-provider-related aspects of their encounters. Provider-specific factors carry the greatest influence in the patient's perceived satisfaction with the experience as a whole and likelihood to recommend the practice.