[Local versus locoregional anesthesia in transfemoral TAVI procedures]. / Anesthésie locale comparée à l'anesthésie locorégionale dans les procédures TAVI par voie transfémorale.

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the treatment of choice for the most fragile patients with severe aortic stenosis. The transfemoral route is preferred as the simplest and safest. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy, tolerance and safety of local vs. locoregional anesthesia in trans-femoral TAVI procedures. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This was a single-center retrospective study. Patients treated with femoral TAVI between February 25 and November 15, 2022 at the University Hospital of Reims were included, and two groups (local and locoregional anesthesia) were compared. RESULTS: TAVI success rate (92.9%), death rate (3.0%) and procedure duration (90.5 ± 13.5 minutes) did not differ between groups (p = 0.18, 0.15 and 0.55 respectively). For intra- and post-procedural treatments, the use of sedation, analgesics and benzodiazepines did not differ between groups. The cumulative dose of Remifentanil used per-procedure was lower in the local anesthesia group than in the locoregional anesthesia group (148.6 ± 71.9 mcg vs. 208.9 ± 110.0 mcg; p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In this non-randomized retrospective study, local and locoregional anesthesia had comparable safety and efficacy in transfemoral TAVI procedures. In a constrained context and with a view to simplification, these results encourage transfemoral TAVIs to be performed under local anaesthesia, and to consider a "PCI-like" approach, without the presence of an anaesthetist, for selected patients without respiratory, musculoskeletal or agitation disorders, or vascular approach difficulties.

Current treatment of symptomatic aortic stenosis in elderly patients: Do risk scores really matter after 80 years of age?

BACKGROUND: According to the guidelines, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is recommended in patients at low surgical risk (EuroSCORE II<4%), whereas for other patients, the decision between transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgery should be made by the Heart Team, with TAVI being favoured in elderly patients. AIM: The RAC prospective multicentre survey assessed the respective contributions of age and surgical risk scores in therapeutic decision making in elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. METHODS: In September and October 2016, 1049 consecutive patients aged ≥ 75 years were included in 32 centres with on-site TAVI and surgical facilities. The primary endpoint was the decision between medical management, TAVI or SAVR. RESULTS: Mean age was 84±5 years and 53% of patients were female. The surgical risk was classified as high (EuroSCORE II>8%) in 18% of patients, intermediate (EuroSCORE II 4-8%) in 34% and low (EuroSCORE II≤4%) in 48%. TAVI was preferred in 71% of patients, SAVR in 19% and medical treatment in 10%. The choice of TAVI over SAVR was associated with older age (P<0.0001) and a higher EuroSCORE II (P=0.008). However, the weight of EuroSCORE II in therapeutic decision making markedly decreased after the age of 80 years. Indeed, 77% of patients aged ≥ 80 years were referred for TAVI, despite a low estimated surgical risk. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of risk scores depends strongly on age, and decreases considerably after 80 years, most patients being referred for TAVI, independent of their estimated surgical risk. Despite medical advancements, 10% of patients were still denied any intervention.

Effect of oral anticoagulation on clinical outcomes and haemodynamic variables after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: The effect of oral anticoagulation on clinical and haemodynamic outcomes following successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation is unclear. AIMS: To evaluate the effect of oral anticoagulation within the first year after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. METHODS: All patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation in two French tertiary centres from 2010 to 2016 were included prospectively. The composite outcome of death, stroke, readmission for heart failure or major/life-threatening bleeding according to Valve Academic Research Consortium 2 criteria within 1year was evaluated. Valvular haemodynamic deterioration was defined as mean transprosthetic gradient ≥20mmHg or an increase of ≥10mmHg during echocardiographic follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 1139 patients included, 400 (35.1%) were discharged on oral anticoagulation. The primary endpoint was more frequent in the group with versus without oral anticoagulation (29.4% vs. 17.3% 21.5%; hazard ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.42-2.35). Composite endpoint risk factors were chronic pulmonary and kidney diseases, previous atrial fibrillation, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30% at discharge and no femoral vascular approach, but not oral anticoagulation prescription at discharge. Conversely, 58 patients were identified with valvular haemodynamic deterioration, including 11 (19%) in the group with oral anticoagulation and 47 (81%) in the group without oral anticoagulation. Valvular haemodynamic deterioration risk factors were absence of oral anticoagulation exposure, increased body mass index, use of a balloon-expandable bioprosthesis and use of a bioprosthesis with diameter ≤23mm. Antithrombotic treatment crossover (i.e. oral anticoagulation interruption or introduction during follow-up) occurred in 9.6% of patients, and was a risk factor for death (adjusted hazard ratio 3.39, 95% confidence interval 1.63-7.07). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline characteristics, rather than oral anticoagulation prescription at discharge, were associated with adverse outcomes following successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Conversely, oral anticoagulation was associated with reduced valvular haemodynamic deterioration.

The difficult balance between thrombosis and bleeding after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A translational review.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as the treatment of choice for patients with severe aortic stenosis deemed at high or intermediate risk for cardiac surgery. In light of the latest literature advances, TAVR will undoubtedly concern a growing number of patients because of the progressive extension of its indications. Whereas significant efforts have been made to reduce the burden of periprocedural complications, TAVR still exposes patients to a sizeable number of adverse outcomes, including thrombotic and bleeding events. Although contradictory, these two phenomena are closely related to pathophysiological processes inherent to flow disturbances induced by aortic stenosis itself, but also to a complex interaction between bioprosthetic valves and native tissues in frail patients clustering various co-morbidities. Reinforcing this paradigm, multiple TAVR studies have emphasized the view that both thrombosis and bleeding events have a deleterious effect on patient outcomes. Therefore, we sought to perform a comprehensive translational review of the current literature addressing the pathophysiological mechanisms leading to thrombosis and bleeding after TAVR, and underline innovative strategies aimed at reducing these complications.

Incidence of, risk factors for and impact of readmission for heart failure after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of and risk factors for readmission for heart failure after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are unclear. AIMS: We sought to evaluate the incidence of, risk factors for and clinical impact of readmission for heart failure after successful TAVI in an unselected patient population. METHODS: All patients who underwent successful TAVI in two high-volume French tertiary centres from February 2010 to December 2016 were included prospectively and followed up for 1 year. A Cox multivariable model was used to assess risk factors for readmission for heart failure and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1139 patients (mean age 82.4±7.7years; 52.2% male sex) were included. Readmission for heart failure occurred in 99 (9.2%) patients. Risk factors for readmission for heart failure were previous atrial fibrillation (adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-2.40), diabetes mellitus (adjHR 1.67, 95% CI 1.11-2.50), chronic kidney disease (adjHR 1.72, 95% CI 1.13-2.62), chronic pulmonary disease (adjHR 1.81, 95% CI 1.17-2.81) and left ventricular ejection fraction after TAVI ≤ 35% (adjHR 2.12, 95% CI 1.20-3.75). Readmission for heart failure was strongly associated with mortality (adjHR 3.11, 95% CI 1.95-4.94), along with increased Society of Thoracic Surgeons' score (adjHR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.12), chronic pulmonary disease (adjHR 1.45, 95% CI 1.00-2.09), previous atrial fibrillation (adjHR 2.11, 95% CI 1.52-2.93) and shock during the index hospitalization (adjHR 2.56, 95% CI 1.41-4.65). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission for heart failure occurs in one in 10 patients after successful TAVI, and is a strong risk factor for mortality. Co-morbidities and left ventricular ejection fraction after TAVI≤35% are the main risk factors for readmission for heart failure.

[Common femoral artery bailout stenting with covered stent graft due to TAVR vascular complication: Clinical long term follow-up]. / Suivi clinique après implantation d'un stent couvert dans l'artère fémorale commune au décours immédiat d'une complication vasculaire per-TAVI.

BACKGROUND: Vascular complications are frequent in the context of transcatheter aortic valve replacement and may require the implantation of a covered stent graft in the common femforal artery. However, common femoral artery is considered to be at high risk of stent fracture or occlusion due to high mobility of the hip joint. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed medical records of patients with transcatheter aortic valve replacement related vascular complications between 2015 and 2018, treated with commom femoral artery transluminal angioplasty or surgery. Vascular complications or suspect symptoms were followed up by phone calls. RESULTS: Among 552 patients, 43 patients were included. Twelve (11.6 %) were managed by prolonged balloon inflation, 5 (11.6 %) by first line surgery and 26 (60.4 %) by the implantation of a covered stent graft. Among the latter group, the covered stent graft was efficient in 24 patients (92.3 %). The median follow-up was 430 days [3-1499]. The first-line surgery group had a higher risk of red blood cell transfusion and all causes mortality. At follow-up, no patient had suspicious symptoms of vascular covered stent complication. Four patients (9.3 %) had US-doppler or CT vascular imaging at follow-up, showing no evidence of stent fracture or occlusion. CONCLUSION: In our study, the implantation of a covered stent graft in the common femoral artery was an efficient and safe strategy for the management of transcatheter aortic valve replacement related vascular complications.

Evolution of chronic kidney disease after surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Immediate improvement in kidney function has been reported after surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Long-term data, however, are not available. AIM: To assess the evolution of kidney function in chronic kidney disease stage 3b-5, 1 year after surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation. METHODS: All patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3b-5 undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis in a single centre were included. Kidney function was assessed 1 year postprocedure. Improvement or deterioration in estimated glomerular filtration rate was defined by an increase or decrease of 5mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, 127 procedures were analysed (54 surgical aortic valve replacements and 73 transcatheter aortic valve implantations). Kidney function improved in 51% of patients at 1 year (45% of the surgical aortic valve replacement group versus 57% of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation group; P=0.21), and deteriorated in only 14% of patients at 1 year (18% of the surgical aortic valve replacement group versus 10% of the transcatheter aortic valve implantation group; P=0.22). Almost a quarter of patients (23%) had an improvement in estimated glomerular filtration rate of>15mL/min/1.73 m2, and this was consistent at later follow-up. Few patients went onto chronic dialysis at 1 year (three after surgical aortic valve replacement and one after transcatheter aortic valve implantation). Acute kidney injury was an independent prognostic factor for long-term deterioration in kidney function (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4-3.6; P=0.006). CONCLUSION: Aortic valve replacement, whether by surgical aortic valve replacement or transcatheter aortic valve implantation, improved estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year in more than half of patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3b-5.

Is transcatheter aortic valve replacement a profitable procedure in a high-volume French hospital?

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the prognosis of inoperable patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Yet, the implantation of expensive prostheses in patients with comorbidities may be questionable in an era when healthcare costs are becoming a major concern. AIM: The objective of this study was to assess whether the TAVR procedure is profitable in a high-volume French hospital. METHODS: Consecutive patients eligible for transfemoral TAVR using the SAPIEN bioprostheses (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) were included retrospectively in this single-centre study between September 2014 and December 2015. Three medicoeconomic severity-level subgroups were considered. The primary clinical endpoint was the difference between hospital costs and revenues, calculated for each patient. Secondary composite endpoints included major adverse events within 30 days and breakdown of costs. RESULTS: Overall, 189 patients were included in the analysis. Three patients died (two from non-cardiac causes) within 30 days of the procedure. The mean hospital cost was €27,530±3814 per patient, and the mean hospital income was €30,313±2681 per patient (P<0.001), resulting in a significant profit of €2783±1743 per patient. The total estimated profit was €525,000 for the whole study period. The largest benefits were observed for patients assigned to the lowest severity level. The price of the bioprosthesis represented 71% of the total costs. CONCLUSIONS: The TAVR procedure performed in carefully selected patients was profitable for the academic centre, regardless of the level of severity assigned to the patients.

Management of vascular complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Vascular complications (VCs) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are frequent and their management is challenging. AIM: To report the incidence, predictors and management of VCs following percutaneous transfemoral TAVI (TF-TAVI) at a single centre. METHODS: We analyzed 102 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous TF-TAVI between August 2008 and December 2013. All endpoints were evaluated at 30 days and 6 months according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. VC percutaneous treatment success was defined as residual stenosis<30%, absence of blood extravasation and absence of surgical or repeat endovascular intervention at 30 days. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (22%) experienced VCs, including five patients (5%) with major VCs. Mortality at 30 days was significantly higher in patients with major VCs than in patients without major VCs (60% vs 3%; P=0.001). Patients with VCs had more life-threatening or major bleeding (23% vs 5%; P=0.02), but no difference in terms of need for blood transfusion was observed. Endovascular treatment was used in 13 of 22 patients with VCs (59%) and was successful in 11 of these 13 patients (85%). Primary surgical repair was necessary in only 1/22 (5%) patients, for a common femoral artery pseudoaneurysm 2 weeks after the TAVI procedure. CONCLUSIONS: VCs following TF-TAVI are frequent. Major but not minor VCs are associated with increased mortality. Percutaneous management of VCs is feasible and safe, and surgery is rarely needed.

A novel contribution towards coherent and reproducible intravalvular measurement of the aortic annulus by multidetector computed tomography ahead of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: As current multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) measurements underestimate the size of the aortic annulus ahead of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), a strategy of approximate annulus area oversizing has been adopted recently. AIMS: To measure the aortic annulus using a novel complementary intravalvular MDCT slice. METHODS: Fifty-five patients with severe aortic stenosis were selected for MDCT ahead of and 1 month after CoreValve(®) TAVI. Two MDCT slices were analysed and compared: the current standard virtual basal ring (VBR) at the nadir of the aortic cusps; and a novel slice, defined as the basal (lowest) complete commissural coaptation (BCCC) plane. RESULTS: BCCC is an intravalvular plane lying 5.2±0.8 mm above the VBR. The BCCC annulus is almost circular, unlike the VBR (mean eccentricity index 0.09±0.04 vs 0.3±0.1, respectively). The mean BCCC annulus diameter was 26.6±2.3 mm, 16% larger than that of the VBR (23.9±2.2 mm; P<0.001). The BCCC annulus area proved coherent with the orifice area measured after TAVI on the projection of the same slice (i.e. systematically equal to or greater than the latter [mean difference, +2.3±1.4 mm]), in contrast to the wider scatter found for the VBR (-1.3±2.0 mm). Once the sclerotic calcified valves have been pushed back by the implant, the aortic orifice after TAVI will inevitably be equal to or less than the diameter of the virtually unvalved annulus before TAVI. CONCLUSION: Based on the present results, we recommend including a BCCC slice to complete aortic annulus sizing, in order to optimize implant calibration.

[Emergent transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a patient with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis in cardiogenic shock]. / Choc cardiogénique sur bicuspidie aortique sténosante traité par remplacement valvulaire aortique percutané en urgence.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a therapeutic option for high-risk patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and with cardiac symptoms. This procedure requires the preliminary evaluation by a "heart team" and presents some contraindications. We report the case of a 58-year-old man with severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis and cardiogenic shock. In spite of contraindications and because of the failure of balloon aortic valvuloplasty, transcatheter aortic valve implantation was performed in emergency.

Agreement between the new EuroSCORE II, the Logistic EuroSCORE and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score: implications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: The Logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score are routinely used to identify patients at high surgical risk as potential candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). AIMS: To compare the new EuroSCORE II with the Logistic EuroSCORE and the STS score. METHODS: From October 2006 to June 2011, patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who underwent a TAVI were enrolled prospectively. RESULTS: Among 272 patients, the EuroSCORE II was significantly lower and moderately correlated with the Logistic EuroSCORE (9±8% vs. 23±14%, P<0.01; r=0.61, P<0.001), but similar to and poorly correlated with the STS (10±9%, P=0.10; r=0.25, P<0.001). Based on recommended high-risk thresholds (Logistic EuroSCORE≥20%; STS≥10%), a EuroSCORE II≥7% provided the best diagnostic value. However, using the EuroSCORE II, Logistic EuroSCORE or STS score, only 51%, 58% and 37% of patients, respectively, reached these thresholds. Contingency analyses showed that agreements between the EuroSCORE II and the Logistic EuroSCORE or the STS score were modest or poor, respectively, with a risk assessment different in 28% and 36% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A EuroSCORE II≥7% corresponded to a Logistic EuroSCORE≥20% or STS score≥10%, but correlations and agreements were at best modest and only approximately half of the patients reached these thresholds. Our results highlight the limits of current scoring systems and reinforce the European guidelines stressing the importance of clinical judgment in addition to risk scores.