Are completed ReSPECT plans facilitating person-centred care? An evaluation of completed plans in UK general practice.

Background: The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) includes agreed clinical recommendations for a person's care in a future emergency which have been informed by discussion of the person's preferences. Previous evaluation of ReSPECT plans in acute NHS hospitals found inconsistencies in recording patient's preferences and involvement in the plan, and infrequent justification for recommendations. Aim: To explore to what extent ReSPECT recommendations reflect individual preferences, as documented in the plan. Methods: ReSPECT plans of adults were collected from 11 General Practices in England. We adapted an evaluation tool used previously to analyse ReSPECT plans in acute settings. Free text sections for individual values/preferences and clinical recommendations were examined for clarity, consistency and congruency between them. Results: We retrieved 141 ReSPECT plans. Patients or those close to the patient were recorded as being consulted in most plans (94%). Individual preferences were completed in 57% of plans. Clinical recommendations reflected individual preferences by directly referencing the person and their preferences (31%), by being consistent with the documented preferences (30%), or by using the same wording as the preferences (6%). Conclusion: While many clinical recommendations reflect individual preferences, the preferences themselves are only recorded in just over half of ReSPECT plans. This is problematic, because the recording of individual preferences facilitates person-centred care, both directly by informing recommendations and indirectly when used to guide decision-making in situations not anticipated in the plan. Future training for clinicians should emphasize the need to document the personal values section of the plan.

Friends, neighbors, country, and respect: Status ladders and health behaviors in the United States.

Efforts to understand the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and health have expanded beyond traditional indicators of education, income, occupation, and wealth to individuals' own reports of where they stand. This more contemporary approach has enjoyed considerable success, in that self-reported SES standing, often measured on a ladder representing the entire U.S. socioeconomic hierarchy, is associated strongly with health even when traditional SES indicators are controlled. However, disparities in self-rated health across ladder measures typically are not assessed with regard to health behavior disparities. Here, we draw on two US national probability samples assessing diverse ladder reference groups, as well as a new ladder asking people to report how much respect, honor, or esteem they receive from other people. Respect or honor offers a distinct potential to measure social influence across circles of recognition. We find that U.S.-based ladder status is related to smoking currently or ever and to days of exercise. While friend, neighbor, and respect-based ladders do not relate to health behaviors net of U.S. ladder standing, they show relationships to ever smoking and physical activity, and self-rated health, in their own right. Physical activity accounts for 12-18% of self-rated health disparities by friend, neighbor, or country ladder status. Smoking and drinking do not robustly contribute to ladder-based disparities in self-rated health. Contrasting what is typically found for traditional SES measures, physical activity merits further research, as does the receipt of respect or honor. That status ladder health disparities go largely unexplained by behaviors suggests the potential roles of non-behavioral pathways including inflammation, hopelessness, or classism.

[The place of privacy in the caregiver-caregiver relationship: a descriptive exploratory study]. / La place du respect de l'intimité dans la relation soignant-soignée : une étude exploratoire descriptive.

During care, privacy is subject to physical or moral disrespect. This crucial right of the patient is increasingly neglected in the care-giver-patient relationship. However, it is observed that this is linked to soft skills, and that the majority of healthcare professionals have only one objective, which is the mastery of technical skills. The aim of the present study is to explore and describe in depth the place of respect for privacy in the care-giver-patient relationship in the maternity department of a provincial hospital in Casablanca-Settat region, in Morocco.

Impact of Early Admission Surveys on Physicians' Communication Skills on Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) Scores: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Introduction Effective communication between doctors and patients is one of the 19 core questions on the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. Positive patient experiences, as reflected in HCAHPS scores, are associated with higher quality of care, reduced mortality, and fewer readmissions. These scores also influence a hospital's financial bonuses or penalties from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Methods This quality improvement (QI) initiative evaluated how early surveys of patients' feedback on doctors' communication skills during admission impacted discharge communication scores. The approach involved promptly sharing patients' feedback with physicians and focusing on improving communication skills for those with less-than-perfect scores. Results This QI initiative involved 41 patients. By surveying patients early during admission and addressing communication issues for those with less-than-perfect scores, the percentage of patients achieving a perfect score on all survey questions increased from 18 (43.9%) at admission to 34 (82.9%) at discharge. The largest improvement was seen in perfect scores for doctors' explanations of patients' conditions, which rose from 59% at admission to 90% at discharge. Conversely, the increase in perfect scores for doctors' respectful treatment was smaller, rising from 88% at admission to 98% at discharge. Conclusion Surveying patients about their doctors' communication skills early in admission to identify those with less-than-perfect scores and improving communication for this group resulted in a 39% increase in satisfaction with doctors' communication.

Application of the upcycling trend using ultrafiltrate of water from the production of collagen from fish skin in hair care cosmetics.

The aim of the research problem of the article was to try to popularize the upcycling trend in the production of sustainable cosmetics and to confirm their effectiveness. The development of recycled raw materials is a new discovery in the chemical industry. Manufacturers emphasize the production of more environmentally friendly raw materials. Conscious consumers choose cosmetics whose production is based on sustainable development. Instead of throwing away waste from various industries, let us use it to produce active substances used in hair cosmetics. The production of the collagen series was created in accordance with the principles of upcycling, which involves obtaining collagen water, which is waste generated during the production of supplements. The main goal of the work was to learn cosmetic recipes for styling, washing and conditioning hair based on collagen waste, as well as to compare the results of people using the product in question. The aim of the study was also to demonstrate the effectiveness of the treatment in preventing split ends and hair breakage, usually caused by mechanical stress (brushing), as well as to confirm the effectiveness of other tests. The article presents procedures and parameters confirming the effectiveness of treatment with the tested hair products. The following tests were carried out: hair thickness and density, colour uniformity, shine factor and scalp hydration. All parameters numerically confirmed the beneficial effects of products containing collagen water used in hair care.

L'objectif Synthèse: de l'article était de vulgariser la tendance de l'upcycling dans la production de cosmétiques durables et de confirmer leur efficacité. Le développement de matières premières recyclées est une nouvelle découverte dans l'industrie chimique. Les fabricants mettent l'accent sur la production de matières premières plus respectueuses de l'environnement. Les consommateurs responsables vont choisir des cosmétiques dont la production s'appuie sur des principes de développement durable. Les déchets provenant de diverses industries peuvent servir à la fabrication de substances actives utilisées dans les produits de soins des cheveux. La fabrication de produits à base de collagène reposait sur le principe de l'upcycling, qui consistait à obtenir de l'eau de collagène issue des déchets générés lors de la production de compléments alimentaires. Le but principal était d'apprendre des recettes de cosmétiques pour le coiffage, le lavage et le soin des cheveux à partir de déchets de collagène, et de comparer les résultats avec des personnes utilisant le produit en question. L'objectif de l'étude était de démontrer l'efficacité des soins dans la prévention des fourches et de la casse, généralement causés par un stress mécanique tel que le brossage, et de confirmer l'efficacité d'autres tests. L'article présente les procédures et paramètres confirmant l'efficacité du traitement avec les soins capillaires testés. Les tests suivant ont été menés : épaisseur et densité des cheveux, uniformité de la couleur, brillance et hydratation du cuir chevelu. Les chiffres ont parlé et tous les paramètres ont confirmé les effets bénéfiques des produits contenant de l'eau de collagène dans les soins capillaires.

Prevalence and associated factors of sexting among Taiwanese adolescents.

This study utilized a large-scale representative sample to explore the prevalence of sexting and its associated factors among adolescents in Taiwan. A total of 12,954 students in grade 5-12 countrywide were randomly selected to answer the sexting module of an online survey. 13.7% of the respondents reported having ever received sexts on cellphone, and 2.0% had sent sexts to others. The prevalence was higher among older adolescents. Gender differences were also found, in which female students were more likely to receive sexts (15.8% vs. 11.7%), while male students were at higher risk of sending sexts to others (2.9% vs. 1.1%). A series of hierarchical logistic regression were further performed to examine the associations between potential factors and receiving/sending sexts as the outcome variables. Age, gender, and time spending on texting were significantly associated with receiving and ending sexts. Online respect was found positively associated with receiving sexts but negatively associated with sending them. Privacy awareness was found not significantly associated with sexting. As the first national survey on this growing issue in Taiwan, the results of the present study highlighted the existence of sexting among local youth. Practice and policy implications were discussed.

Practising Less is More: An Exploration of What it Means to See "This Patient" Not a "Patient Like This".

In the last decade literature focused on a "less is more" approach has been primarily represented by clinical cases describing the excesses of an aggressive, redundant, non-personalized, and non-respectful medicine. Most of these articles focus on a "more is worse" approach and centre around the downstream negative consequences of medical overuse. Having identified a gap in the literature on the experience and practice of less, rather than the harms of excess, we carried out an exploratory qualitative study into how a "less is more" approach works in practice. A hermeneutic phenomenological approach was adopted to allow us to examine the realm of lived experience as a valid data source and as a path from which to understand a "less is more" approach "from the bedside." A Phenomenology of Practice was chosen as a more specific frame for this research because of its added focus on action and practical application in professional settings. Seventy stories written by physicians, patients, nurses, caregivers, and other health professionals have been received and analysed. These stories were gathered as part of a project called "Slow Stories" which aimed to collect clinical cases that have been positively resolved by adopting a "less is more" approach to patient care. After having conducted an in-depth analysis, separately and as a group, the researchers identified five key phenomenological themes; Time to relate is time to heal; Doing more does not mean doing better; Settings for a slow medicine; Slow care at the end of life; and Personalized vs. standardized treatment. Each of these themes offers insights into how a "less is more" approach can be used in practice and illustrates how a "less is more" strategy can play a significant role in positively resolving certain clinical cases.

Shared decision-making in maternity care in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) in maternity care involves women actively in decisions, thereby reducing decisional conflicts and enhancing satisfaction with care. AIM: To investigate SDM and the factors associated with it, and its correlation with respect in maternity care in Saudi Arabia. METHODS: A comprehensive, nationwide online questionnaire-based study was conducted between January to May 2023, involving women aged 18 years and above who were either pregnant or had experienced pregnancy/childbirth in the past 12 months. The Mothers' Autonomy in Decision-Making (MADM) scale and the Mothers of Respect Index (MORi) were used. Low to very low SDM was defined as a score of ≤ 24 on the MADM and low to very low respected was defined as a score of ≤ 49 on the MORi. RESULTS: A total of 505 women completed the survey. Low to very low SDM was reported by 137 (34.1 %, 95 confidence interval (CI), 29.6 % - 38.9 %) women. Factors significantly associated with low to very low SDM included seeing different obstetricians of different gender at each visit (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.0, 95 % CI, 1.0 - 3.9), not meeting the same obstetrician throughout the pregnancy (AOR 2.6, 95 % CI, 1.2 - 5.6) and having an instrumental vaginal birth (AOR 6.67, 95 % CI, 1.6 - 28.1). There was a positive association between low to very SDM and feeling of low to very low respect ((χ2 = 83.8173, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: More than one-third of women experienced low to very low SDM in maternity care. This should alert healthcare providers to the importance of continuity of care in Saudi Arabia.

Impairments of Human Dignity at the End of Life Quantitatively Assessed by Health Care Professionals: A Pilot Study From Germany.

BACKGROUND: Empirical investigations on health care professionals' (HCPs) perception of dignity have already spotted common themes in preserving dignity in end-of-life care. However, heterogenic assessment results of varying HCP groups exist. This pilot study wants to provide further evidence on HCPs' rating of dignity-impairing aspects based on a patient-centered concept, especially regarding different underlying job profiles and other professional characteristics. METHODS: In a quantitative study design, the rating of dignity-impairing factors in end-of-life care via an adapted version of the Patient Dignity Inventory (aPDI) was assessed. Participants of the relevant professional groups were recruited via convenience sampling from a region of Germany. RESULTS: From the final sample of participants, 229 questionnaires were analyzed. The overall importance of each dignity-impairing aspect in end-of-life care was considered to be very high by all different HCP groups. Nonetheless, ratings differed between professions: nursing staff had the highest ratings of importance compared to both physicians and individuals with multiple occupations. Participants with previous knowledge in bioethics also rated some aspects as more important compared to those without this feature. CONCLUSION: With the findings of this investigation, an insight of how professionals rate impairments of dignity at the end of life based on a patient-centered concept is given. Thus, a link between empirical research and medical ethics is added. Potential normative implications for HCPs in practice of a dignified care can be derived, consisting of actively addressing social topics as well as further stressing ethics as a fundamental subject in the training and continuing education.

Development and Validation of a questionnaire on human dignity in nursing cares: an exploratory sequential mixed study / Desarrollo y validación de un cuestionario sobre dignidad humana en los cuidados de enfermería. Un estudio exploratorio secuencial mixto / Desenvolvimento e validação de um questionário sobre a dignidade humana nos cuidados de enfermagem. Um estudo exploratório misto sequencial exploratório

Objective.The current study aimed to develop and validate of human dignity questionnaire in nursing care. Methods. The present research is a sequential exploratory mixed method study. The questionnaire was developed and validated in three phases: (1) the concept of human dignity was defined through conventional content analysis qualitative approach, (2) early items of questionnaire was generated according to findings of the first phase, (3) validation of the questionnaire was evaluated using face, content and construct validity as well as reliability. The study was conducted with the participation of 13 nurses in the qualitative section and 203 nurses in the quantitative section in teaching hospitals affiliated to Jahrom University of Medical Sciences (Iran). Results. In the qualitative section, the definition and dimensions of the concept of human dignity in nursing care were discovered. In the quantitative section, the initial pool of items for the questionnaire of human dignity in nursing care was formed using the results of the qualitative section of the study and review of texts and related questionnaires. In factor analysis, four subscales including: respectful communication, equality of patient human value, preservation of privacy and patient-centered care were extracted by Eigen value above one. Internal consistency and stability of the questionnaire were calculated as 0.85 and 0.80, respectively, indicating an excellent reliability. Conclusions. The 20-item developed questionnaire is valid and reliable for measurement of human dignity questionnaire in nursing cares.

Objetivo. Elaborar y validar un cuestionario sobre la dignidad humana en los cuidados de enfermería. Métodos. Estudio exploratorio secuencial de método mixto. El cuestionario se desarrolló y validó en tres fases: (1) se definió el concepto de dignidad humana mediante un enfoque cualitativo de análisis de contenido convencional, (2) se generaron los primeros ítems del cuestionario de acuerdo con los resultados de la primera fase, (3) se evaluó la validación del cuestionario mediante la validez facial, de contenido y de constructo, así como la fiabilidad. El estudio se llevó a cabo con la participación de 13 enfermeras en la sección cualitativa y 203 enfermeras en la sección cuantitativa en hospitales docentes afiliados a la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Jahrom (Irán). Resultados. En la fase cualitativa emergieron las dimensiones del concepto de dignidad humana en los cuidados de enfermería. En la sección cuantitativa, el grupo inicial de ítems para el cuestionario de dignidad humana en los cuidados de enfermería se formó utilizando los resultados de la sección cualitativa y de la revisión instrumentos relacionados. En el análisis factorial, se extrajeron cuatro subescalas con un valor Eigen superior a uno: comunicación respetuosa, igualdad del valor humano del paciente, preservación de la intimidad y cuidados centrados en el paciente, consistencia interna y la estabilidad del cuestionario se calcularon en 0.85 y 0.80, respectivamente, lo que indica una excelente fiabilidad. Conclusión.El cuestionario de 20 ítems desarrollado es válido y fiable para medir la dignidad humana en los cuidados de enfermería.

Objectivo. Desenvolver e validar um questionário sobre a dignidade humana nos cuidados de enfermagem. Métodos. Estudo exploratório sequencial misto de métodos exploratórios. O questionário foi desenvolvido e validado em três fases: (1) o conceito de dignidade humana foi definido utilizando uma abordagem de análise de conteúdo qualitativa convencional, (2) os primeiros itens do questionário foram gerados com base nos resultados da primeira fase, (3) a validação do questionário foi avaliada através da validade de face, de conteúdo e de construção, bem como da fiabilidade. O estudo foi realizado com a participação de 13 enfermeiros na secção qualitativa e 203 enfermeiros na secção quantitativa em hospitais universitários filiados na Universidade de Ciências Médicas de Jahrom (Irão). Resultados. Na fase qualitativa, emergiram as dimensões do conceito de dignidade humana nos cuidados de enfermagem. Na secção quantitativa, o conjunto inicial de itens para o questionário sobre a dignidade humana nos cuidados de enfermagem foi formado utilizando os resultados da secção qualitativa e a revisão de instrumentos relacionados. Na análise fatorial, foram extraídas quatro subescalas com um valor Eigen superior a 1: comunicação respeitosa, igual valor humano do doente, preservação da privacidade e cuidados centrados no doente. A consistência interna e a estabilidade do questionário foram calculadas em 0.85 e 0.80, respetivamente, indicando uma excelente fiabilidade. Conclusão. O questionário de 20 itens desenvolvido é válido e fiável para medir a dignidade humana nos cuidados de enfermagem.

The bottom-up approach in multigenerational family therapy: The child as the family guide.

In therapy, the child is mainly seen as a problem to be labeled or as a victim of various forms of abuse. The idea of the child as a therapeutic resource is the central point of my article where children's symptoms are quickly reframed and get a relational meaning in the family. Once the relational competence of the child is appreciated and his voice is heard, the child becomes a special guide to explore the emotional world of his family, and the genogram can provide a wonderful platform to start this therapeutic journey. Using a multigenerational lens, I describe how to explore family development with a "bottom-up approach." Intergenerational questions can be asked to the child and with his help relevant family events can emerge and broken bonds repaired. The therapeutic results I expect are the resolution of children's problems and family transformation.

Nursing peer feedback: Optimizing our relationships with human resources and collective bargaining organizations.

Nursing leaders have recognized the need for consistent mechanisms to promote and sustain nursing professionalism. Peer-to-peer feedback and peer review are widely effective for nurse professionalism and self-regulation, patient care outcomes, and retention. Unprofessional behavior has been noted as widespread in health care and the effects on patients, clinicians, and organizations have been well-documented. Approximately 10% of the registered nurses in the United States belong to a collective bargaining unit (CBU) or union. This article will describe how a peer feedback program to address unprofessional behavior was implemented in a Magnet nursing practice with CBU representation.

How infants predict respect-based power.

Research has shown that infants represent legitimate leadership and predict continued obedience to authority, but which cues they use to do so remains unknown. Across eight pre-registered experiments varying the cue provided, we tested if Norwegian 21-month-olds (N=128) expected three protagonists to obey a character even in her absence. We assessed whether bowing for the character, receiving a tribute from or conferring a benefit to the protagonists, imposing a cost on them (forcefully taking a resource or hitting them), or relative physical size were used as cues to generate the expectation of continued obedience that marks legitimate leadership. Whereas bowing sufficed in generating such an expectation, we found positive Bayesian evidence that all the other cues did not. Norwegian infants unlikely have witnessed bowing in their everyday life. Hence, bowing/prostration as cue for continued obedience may form part of an early-developing capacity to represent leadership built by evolution.

Development and Validation of a questionnaire on human dignity in nursing cares: an exploratory sequential mixed study.

Objective: The current study aimed to develop and validate of human dignity questionnaire in nursing care. Methods: The present research is a sequential exploratory mixed method study. The questionnaire was developed and validated in three phases: (1) the concept of human dignity was defined through conventional content analysis qualitative approach, (2) early items of questionnaire was generated according to findings of the first phase, (3) validation of the questionnaire was evaluated using face, content and construct validity as well as reliability. The study was conducted with the participation of 13 nurses in the qualitative section and 203 nurses in the quantitative section in teaching hospitals affiliated to Jahrom University of Medical Sciences (Iran). Results: In the qualitative section, the definition and dimensions of the concept of human dignity in nursing care were discovered. In the quantitative section, the initial pool of items for the questionnaire of human dignity in nursing care was formed using the results of the qualitative section of the study and review of texts and related questionnaires. In factor analysis, four subscales including: respectful communication, equality of patient human value, preservation of privacy and patient-centered care were extracted by Eigen value above one. Internal consistency and stability of the questionnaire were calculated as 0.85 and 0.80, respectively, indicating an excellent reliability. Conclusion: The 20-item developed questionnaire is valid and reliable for measurement of human dignity questionnaire in nursing cares.

"We rely on each other": A qualitative exploration of rural Eastern Region Native American experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Native American communities suffered disproportionately negative effects during the COVID-19 pandemic, yet no research has explored the experiences of rural Eastern Region Native Americans. Methods: Informed by the Native Reliance Model and Indigenous Standpoint Theory, we conducted a qualitative descriptive project in the Spring and Summer of 2022; data included semi-structured interviews and focus groups with 24 individuals representing five South Carolina tribal groups. Findings: Thematic analysis yielded four emergent themes: 1) "Let's just finish the Indians off": Pandemic distrust rooted in historical and contemporary Native American experiences; 2) "We have been misled": Making sense of conflicting public health information; 3) "I'm not giving it to some innocent person": COVID-19 mitigation behaviors as Native American cultural practice; and 4) "We put the plan in place": Self-advocacy and action as a source of Native American pride and responsibility. Interpretation: These participants demonstrated resiliency grounded in family and tribal ties, even in the face of personal losses, economic struggles, and healthcare barriers. To strike a balance between cultural traditions and public health recommendations, public health practitioners should 1) build partnerships with community leaders, elders, and tribal health authorities to facilitate the development of culturally respectful interventions that address specific health concerns in the context of historical traumas; and 2) implement alternative methods of communication and engagement to ensure equitable access to healthcare services in rural locations, such as collaborating with community organizations, deploying mobile health units, and utilizing traditional channels of communication within these communities.

'Against Medical Advice' Discharges After Respiratory-Related Hospitalizations: Strategies for Respectful Care.

Against medical advice (AMA) discharges are practically and emotionally challenging for both patients and clinicians. Moreover, they are common after admissions for respiratory conditions such as COPD and asthma, and they are associated with poor outcomes. Despite the challenges presented by AMA discharges, clinicians rarely receive formal education and have limited guidance on how to approach these discharges. Often, the approach to AMA discharges prioritizes designating the discharge as "AMA," whereas effective coordination of discharge care receives less attention. Such an approach can lead to stigmatization of patients and low-quality care. Although evidence for best practices in AMA discharges remains lacking, we propose a set of strategies to improve care in AMA discharges by focusing on respect, in which clinicians treat patients as equals and honor differing values. We describe five strategies, including (1) preventing an AMA discharge; (2) conducting a patient-centered and truthful discussion of risk; (3) providing harm-reducing discharge care; (4) minimizing stigma and bias; (5) educating trainees. Through a case of a patient discharging AMA after a COPD exacerbation, we highlight how these strategies can be applied to common issues in respiratory-related hospitalizations, such as prescribing inhalers and managing oxygen requirements. We argue that, by using these strategies, clinicians can deliver respectful and higher-quality care to an often-marginalized population of patients with respiratory disease.

Nancy S. Jecker, Zohar Lederman, and Anita Ho reply.

This letter replies to the letter "Colonial and Neocolonial Barriers to Companion Digital Humans in Africa," by Luís Cordeiro-Rodrigues, in the same, May-June 2024, issue of the Hastings Center Report.

Learning from the multidisciplinary team: advancing patient care through collaboration.

Training for doctors, and other healthcare workers, has traditionally focussed on developing the knowledge and technical skills relevant to individual specialties. There has been an assumption that once trained in this way, we will be able to work easily and effectively in teams with other professionals. Multidisciplinary working is now a normal pattern of healthcare delivery and teamwork is taught as part of current curricula. Interdisciplinary learning is becoming more common, with medical students, nursing students and other professions allied to medicine learning together during their training. Healthcare staff who are already qualified have not had the benefit of being taught the particular skills needed to work well as part of diverse teams, nor given the skills to identify and overcome barriers to effective teamwork. We all need to develop these skills to help our patients get the best care from the teams looking after them.