Risk of stress cardiomyopathy associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors: a real-world pharmacovigilance analysis.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are reported to cause stress cardiomyopathy (SC). This study evaluated the association between SSRI/SNRI use and the occurrence of cardiomyopathy in the publicly available U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Disproportionate analysis and likelihood ratio tests were used to identify risk associated with SSRIs or SNRIs and the incidence of SC, using data from between from 2012 to 2022 acquired from the FAERS database. The study identified 132 individual case safety reports (ICSRs) of SC associated with SSRIs or SNRIs. Venlafaxine (48%) and fluoxetine (27%) were the most common antidepressants of the ICSRs. Approximately 80% of SC cases were reported in females, with individuals aged 45-65 years identified as a high-risk population. Both venlafaxine (ratio-scale information component [RSIC] 2.54, 95% CI 2.06-3.04) and fluoxetine (RSIC 3.20, 95% CI 2.31-4.47) were associated with SC, with likelihood ratio estimates of 3.55 (p = 0.02) for venlafaxine and 4.82 (p = 0.008) for fluoxetine. The median time to cardiomyopathy onset was 20 days, with hospitalization reported in 48.33% of patients. Venlafaxine and fluoxetine were associated with SC risk, particularly in middle-aged women. Caution should be exercised when using SSRIs or SNRIs combined with other serotonergic medications.

The Risk of Postpartum Hemorrhage with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Serotonin Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors: Preliminary Results from the Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications.

Background: Previous studies suggest an association between late pregnancy exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and increased postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) risk. This is the first pregnancy registry study to compare PPH outcomes among women with psychiatric illness exposed or unexposed to SSRIs/SNRIs proximate to delivery. Methods: This study used data from the National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications to evaluate the relationship between SSRI/SNRI exposure in late pregnancy and PPH risk. The sample included n = 953 participants with retrospectively collected medical record data on postpartum blood loss, n = 453 unexposed to SSRIs/SNRIs during pregnancy, and n = 500 exposed at least during the week of delivery. PPH was defined as an estimated blood loss ≥500 mL following vaginal delivery or ≥1,000 mL following cesarean section (C-section), with onset of excessive bleeding occurring within the first 24 hours postpartum. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine odds ratios. Results: Overall PPH incidence was 13.1%. SSRI/SNRI exposure was associated with a PPH unadjusted odds ratio of 1.42 compared to no exposure (95% confidence interval [CI: 0.97, 2.08]) and an adjusted odds ratio of 1.33 (95% CI [0.90, 1.97]). When stratified by delivery type, the odds ratio following vaginal delivery among women exposed to SSRIs/SNRIs was 1.04 (95% CI [0.63, 1.70]) versus 2.31 (95% CI [1.25, 4.26]) for C-section delivery; the adjusted C-section odds ratio was 2.21 (95% CI [1.18, 4.13]). Conclusions: Although these findings align with accumulating evidence suggesting SSRI/SNRI exposure may confer a modestly increased risk of PPH, particularly after C-section, the study was underpowered to make definitive conclusions. These preliminary data highlight the need for further research with larger sample sizes. Nevertheless, the findings underscore the importance of greater clinical monitoring for PPH following C-section, especially in women who may have other known PPH risk factors and are exposed to SSRIs/SNRIs in late pregnancy.

Effectiveness and Safety of Flupentixol and Melitracen Tablets for the Treatment of Patients with Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Flupentixol and melitracen are being investigated for their potential effectiveness in managing persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP), based on their mechanisms of action as dopamine receptor antagonists and noradrenaline/serotonin reuptake inhibitors, respectively. The efficacy and safety of flupentixol and melitracen (FM) tablets in treating PIFP were retrospectively analyzed at our hospital. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of FM tablets in treating PIFP. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective unicentric cohort design. SETTING: An academic university hospital. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort comprising 128 patients with a definite diagnoses of PIFP who were treated with FM tablets (flupentixol 0.5 mg and melitracen 10 mg tablet, >= 4 tablets/d) from January 2022 through May 2023 at an academic university hospital. Baseline conditions were statistically described, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) scores of pain levels before and during treatment were collected. Pain relief rates were calculated. Differences in baseline characteristics between responsive and unresponsive patients were evaluated using statistical tests. Additionally, the side effects experienced during treatment were summarized. RESULTS: Among the included 128 patients, 105 (82.0%) patients achieved pain relief (pain NRS-11 score reduction rate >= 50%). The median treatment onset time was 3 (1-7) days. NRS-11 scores of responsive patients at week 2, week 4, week 8, and week 12 were significantly lower than the baseline NRS-11 scores (P < 0.001), regardless of their Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score. Pain duration was the only factor that related to responsiveness (Wilcoxon rank sum test, P < 0.001; logistic regression, P = 0.001). No serious side effects that could affect patients' lives were observed during the first week of treatments. LIMITATIONS: Due to its retrospective nature, this study is limited by its lack of a randomized control. The lack of data on nonresponders who did not achieve significant pain relief hinders assessing overall change and the placebo effects'. Patients previously treated with antidepressants were excluded, making it hard to determine if FM tablets were a better treatment for PIFP. Additionally, the small sample size in a single center may be influenced by chance variation in pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: FM tablets showed its potential in the management of PIFP with considerable efficacy and safety. Early administration of FM tablets after a PIFP diagnosis may result in a high possibility of pain relief.

Advances in Therapeutics to Alleviate Cognitive Decline and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Alzheimer's Disease.

Dementia exists as a 'progressive clinical syndrome of deteriorating mental function significant enough to interfere with activities of daily living', with the most prevalent type of dementia being Alzheimer's disease (AD), accounting for about 80% of diagnosed cases. AD is associated with an increased risk of comorbidity with other clinical conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, and neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) including, agitation, anxiety, and depression as well as increased mortality in late life. For example, up to 70% of patients diagnosed with AD are affected by anxiety. As aging is the major risk factor for AD, this represents a huge global burden in ageing populations. Over the last 10 years, significant efforts have been made to recognize the complexity of AD and understand the aetiology and pathophysiology of the disease as well as biomarkers for early detection. Yet, earlier treatment options, including acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and glutamate receptor regulators, have been limited as they work by targeting the symptoms, with only the more recent FDA-approved drugs being designed to target amyloid-ß protein with the aim of slowing down the progression of the disease. However, these drugs may only help temporarily, cannot stop or reverse the disease, and do not act by reducing NPS associated with AD. The first-line treatment options for the management of NPS are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs/SNRIs) targeting the monoaminergic system; however, they are not rational drug choices for the management of anxiety disorders since the GABAergic system has a prominent role in their development. Considering the overall treatment failures and side effects of currently available medication, there is an unmet clinical need for rationally designed therapies for anxiety disorders associated with AD. In this review, we summarize the current status of the therapy of AD and aim to highlight novel angles for future drug therapy in our ongoing efforts to alleviate the cognitive deficits and NPS associated with this devastating disease.

Stress-induced changes in cognitive function and intestinal barrier integrity can be ameliorated by venlafaxine and synbiotic supplementations.

Stress profoundly impacts various aspects of both physical and psychological well-being. Our previous study demonstrated that venlafaxine (Vlx) and synbiotic (Syn) treatment attenuated learned fear-like behavior and recognition memory impairment in immobilized-stressed rats. In this study, we further investigated the physical, behavior, and cellular mechanisms underlying the effects of Syn and/or Vlx treatment on brain and intestinal functions in stressed rats. Adult male Wistar rats, aged 8 weeks old were subjected to 14 days of immobilization stress showed a decrease in body weight gain and food intake as well as an increase in water consumption, urinary corticosterone levels, and adrenal gland weight. Supplementation of Syn and/or Vlx in stressed rats resulted in mitigation of weight loss, restoration of normal food and fluid intake, and normalization of corticosterone levels. Behavioral analysis showed that treatment with Syn and/or Vlx enhanced depressive-like behaviors and improved spatial learning-memory impairment in stressed rats. Hippocampal dentate gyrus showed stress-induced neuronal cell death, which was attenuated by Syn and/or Vlx treatment. Stress-induced ileum inflammation and increased intestinal permeability were both effectively reduced by the supplementation of Syn. In addition, Syn and Vlx partly contributed to affecting the expression of the glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor in the hippocampus and intestines of stressed rats, suggesting particularly protective effects on both the gut barrier and the brain. This study highlights the intricate interplay between stress physiological responses in the brain and gut. Syn intervention alleviate stress-induced neuronal cell death and modulate depression- and memory impairment-like behaviors, and improve stress-induced gut barrier dysfunction which were similar to those of Vlx. These findings enhance our understanding of stress-related health conditions and suggest the synbiotic intervention may be a promising approach to ameliorate deleterious effects of stress on the gut-brain axis.

Nonhormonal Pharmacotherapies for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Vasomotor Symptoms.

An average of 60-80% of all menopausal women experience bothersome vasomotor symptoms (VMSs), such as flushing and sweating, within the first seven years of onset. However, despite increasing prevalence, these hot flashes remain hard to treat and have a negative effect on the quality of life. Though hormone replacement therapy is commonly utilized as a standard treatment for VMSs, this therapy is not recommended for all women. Specifically, the oral form of hormone replacement therapy is associated with several contraindications, including a history of thromboembolic disease, migraine headache with aura, liver failure, heart disease, and hormone-dependent cancers. For women with these medical conditions, current literature indicates that nonhormonal therapies such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are suitable alternatives to reduce the frequency and intensity of VMSs. Currently, the only SSRI that is FDA-approved for the treatment of VMSs is paroxetine, but studies show that fluoxetine, citalopram, escitalopram, and sertraline are also proven to provide similar benefits. Similarly, the SNRI venlafaxine has also been well tolerated and has been shown to reduce the frequency and severity of hot flashes. The present investigation reviews the physiology of VMSs and examines the evidence for the use of nonhormonal pharmacologic therapies as treatment for women experiencing hot flashes. These interventions should be considered whenever hormone replacement therapy is contraindicated, with therapy individualized based on the severity of symptoms.

Antidepressants - The new endocrine disruptors? The case of crustaceans.

Antidepressants are high-volume pharmaceuticals that accumulate to concentrations in the µg·L-1 range in surface waters. The release of peptide hormones via neurosecretory cells appears as a natural target for antidepressants. Here I review research that suggests that antidepressants indeed disrupt endocrine signalling in crustaceans, by acting on the synthesis and release of neurohormones, such as crustacean hyperglycaemic hormone, moult inhibiting hormone and pigment dispersing hormone in decapods, as well as methyl farnesoate in Daphnids. Hence, antidepressants can affect hormonal regulation of physiological functions: increase in energy metabolism and activity, lowered ecdysteroid levels, potentially disrupting moult and somatic growth, reducing colour change capacity and compromising camouflage, as well as induction of male sex determination. Several studies further suggest effects of antidepressants on crustacean reproduction, but the hormonal regulation of these effects remains elusive. All things considered, a body of evidence strongly suggests that antidepressants are endocrine disrupting compounds in crustaceans.

Risk of abnormal uterine bleeding associated with high-affinity compared with low-affinity serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised about the potential association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) and the risk of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), which may be influenced by the affinity of SSRIs/SNRIs for serotonin transporter. Thus, we assessed whether SSRIs/SNRIs with high-affinity for serotonin transporter are associated with AUB compared to SSRIs/SNRIs with low-affinity in non-pregnant women. METHODS: Using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we identified a cohort of women aged 15-24 years, newly prescribed a high- or low-affinity SSRI/SNRI between 1990 and 2019. Confounding was addressed using standardized morbidity ratio weighting. We used weighted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) of AUB associated with high-affinity compared with low-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs. We assessed the risk of anemia as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: The cohort included 156,307 users of high-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs and 102,631 users of low-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs. High-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs were not associated with an increased risk of AUB compared with low-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs (incidence rates: 46.3 versus 42.4 per 1000 person-years, respectively; HR 1.01, 95 % CI 0.93-1.09). Duration of use, age, and comorbidities did not modify the risk. However, high-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs were associated with an increased risk of anemia (HR 1.29, 95 % CI 1.04-1.61) compared with low-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs. LIMITATIONS: Residual confounding may still be present. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of AUB did not differ between high- and low-affinity SSRIs/SNRIs. However, the potential risk of anemia suggests the need for monitoring and further investigation of the risk of AUB with these medications.

Distinct effects of SSRIs and SNRIs on Soluble Biomarkers in Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid of people with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Persistent inflammation affects people with HIV (PWH) despite antiretroviral therapy (ART). Selective serotonin and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs, SNRIs), HMG-CoA reductase-inhibitors (statins), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have immuno-modulant properties. We evaluated the potential impact of these drugs on inflammation and neurodegeneration in PWH. METHODS: Cross-sectional single-center (U.S.) analysis in 184 PWH on ART with plasma HIV RNA < 200 cp/mL. All participants had 10 biomarkers measured in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). To reduce dimensionality, hierarchical clustering and principal components (PCs) analysis were employed. The analyses were adjusted for duration of the drugs and and clinical conditions. RESULTS: Participants were mostly middle-aged men, with median CD4+ T-cells of 620/µL. In adjusted models, SSRI use was associated with three PCs: higher CSF and plasma Aß42 and CSF CCL2 (aß=0.14, p = 0.040); lower CSF 8-oxo-dG, total tau, and sCD14 (aß=-0.12, p = 0.042); higher plasma sCD14 with lower sCD40L (aß=0.15, p = 0.042). SNRI use was associated with higher values of CSF and plasma neopterin and CSF sTNFR-II (aß=0.22, p = 0.004). Statins and ACEIs showed no association. CONCLUSIONS: SSRIs and SNRIs had distinct biomarker signatures. SSRIs were associated with reduced neurodegeneration, immune activation and oxidative stress in CSF, suggesting a role of SSRIs as adjunctive therapy in PWH.

SSRIs in the Treatment of Depression: A Pharmacological CUL-DE-SAC?

The widespread adoption of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as first-line pharmacological treatments in the management of clinical depression transformed the landscape of drug therapy for this condition. SSRIs are safer and better tolerated than the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) that they replaced. However, they have limitations that may have placed a ceiling on the expectations of first-line pharmacological treatment. Notable problems with SSRIs include induction of anxiety on treatment initiation, delayed onset of significant therapeutic effect, sexual dysfunction, sleep disturbance and overall modest efficacy. The latter is linked with an inability of SSRIs to effectively treat syndromes of anhedonia and cognitive impairment. Combined serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), such as venlafaxine, have produced some limited improvements over SSRIs in efficacy, at the cost of a greater side-effect burden. Attempts to supplement serotonin reuptake activity with actions at serotonin receptor sub-types have not yet yielded substantial benefits; however, vortioxetine may provide more utility in the management of cognitive impairment. Future advances might come from the development of SNRIs, which more closely mimic the actions of effective TCAs. There may also be possible benefits to be derived from combining SSRIs with 5-HT4 receptor agonists and 5-HT7 receptor antagonists.

Comparative safety of adding serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) versus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) to short-acting opioids for non-malignant pain in nursing homes.

BACKGROUND: The comparative safety of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) as adjuvants to short-acting opioids in older adults is unknown even though SNRIs are commonly used. We compared the effects of SNRIs versus nonsteroidal anti-Inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on delirium among nursing home residents when SNRIs or NSAIDs were added to stable regimens of short-acting opioids. METHODS: Using 2011-2016 national Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 and Medicare claims data to implement a new-user design, we identified a cohort of nursing home residents receiving short-acting opioids who initiated either an SNRI or an NSAID. Delirium was defined from the Confusion Assessment Method in MDS 3.0 assessments and ICD9/10 codes using Medicare hospitalization claims. Propensity score matching balanced underlying differences for initiating treatments on 39 demographic and clinical characteristics (nSNRIs = 5350; nNSAIDs = 5350). Fine and Gray models provided hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusting for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: Hydrocodone was the most commonly used short-acting opioid (48%). Residents received ~23 mg daily oral morphine equivalent at the time of SNRIs/NSAIDs initiation. The majority were women, non-Hispanic White, and aged ≥75 years. There were no differences in any of the confounders after propensity matching. Over 1 year, 10.8% of SNRIs initiators and 8.9% of NSAIDs initiators developed delirium. The rate of delirium onset was similar in SNRIs and NSAID initiators (HR(delirium in nursing home or hospitalization for delirium):1.10; 95% CI: 0.97-1.24; HR(hospitalization for delirium): 1.06; 95% CI: 0.89-1.25), and were similar regardless of baseline opioid daily dosage. CONCLUSIONS: Among nursing home residents, adding SNRIs to short-acting opioids does not appear to increase risk of delirium relative to initiating NSAIDs. Understanding the comparative safety of pain regimens is needed to inform clinical decisions in a medically complex population often excluded from clinical research.

Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Treatments for Depression in Parkinson's Disease: An Updated Review.

Depression represents one of the most common non-motor disorders in Parkinson's disease (PD) and it has been related to worse life quality, higher levels of disability, and cognitive impairment, thereby majorly affecting not only the patients but also their caregivers. Available pharmacological therapeutic options for depression in PD mainly include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants; meanwhile, agents acting on dopaminergic pathways used for motor symptoms, such as levodopa, dopaminergic agonists, and monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors, may also provide beneficial antidepressant effects. Recently, there is a growing interest in non-pharmacological interventions, including cognitive behavioral therapy; physical exercise, including dance and mind-body exercises, such as yoga, tai chi, and qigong; acupuncture; therapeutic massage; music therapy; active therapy; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for refractory cases. However, the optimal treatment approach for PD depression is uncertain, its management may be challenging, and definite guidelines are also lacking. It is still unclear which of these interventions is the most appropriate and for which PD stage under which circumstances. Herein, we aim to provide an updated comprehensive review of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for depression in PD, focusing on recent clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Finally, we discuss the pharmacological agents that are currently under investigation at a clinical level, as well as future approaches based on the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the onset of depression in PD.

Administration of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors tends to have less ocular surface damage in a chronic stress-induced rat model of depression than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

Depressed patients who medicate with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) often report ocular dryness. Epidemiological studies have found that serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) are not risk factors for dry eye in depressed patients. However, the effect of SNRIs on the ocular surface is unknown. A depression rat model was induced by chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS), and SNRIs or SSRIs were administered to the rats for 3 or 6 weeks. The levels of norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin in tear fluid were tested by ELISA. The corneal fluorescence and lissamine green staining were used to evaluate ocular surface damage. NE and/or serotonin were administered to human corneal epithelial cells in vitro. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis was performed to investigate the mRNA expression profiles. Tear NE levels were higher in the SNRIs group, and ocular surface inflammation and apoptosis were significantly reduced compared to the SSRIs group. RNA-Seq indicated that NE significantly activate MAPK signaling pathway. NE can inhibit serotonin-induced activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway through α-1 adrenergic receptors and promotes the proliferation of corneal epithelial cells through activation of the MAPK signaling pathway. SNRIs administration have less ocular surface damage than SSRIs. NE protects human corneal epithelial cells from damage, and reduce inflammation on the ocular surface via activating the MAPK signaling pathway. SNRIs might be used as an appropriate treatment for depression-related DED.