Cytokine-Based Validation of the Inflammation-Based Risk Score in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

This study aimed to validate an inflammation-based risk score in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by examining their cytokine profiles. Upon admission, patients were evaluated for systemic inflammation using a risk score that assigned points based on specific biomarkers: 1 point for leukocyte count ≥9.3 × 10³ cells/µL, 2 points for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) ≥13.0 mg/L, and 3 points for serum albumin ≤3.6 g/dL. Patients were categorized into three groups: no inflammation (0 points, n = 13), mild inflammation (1-2 points, n = 35), and severe inflammation (3-6 points, n = 26). Serum levels of 16 key cytokines were measured. Patients with higher risk scores showed elevated interleukin (IL)-6 levels (19.6 vs. 8.5 vs. 6.8 pg/mL; P = 0.021) and decreased interferon-γ-induced protein-10 (IP-10) levels (73.4 vs. 68.8 vs. 112.2 pg/mL; P = 0.011). IL-6 was positively correlated with hsCRP (ρ 0.307) and negatively correlated with albumin (ρ -0.298), while IP-10 was negatively correlated with leukocyte count (ρ -0.301). No other cytokines showed significant association with the risk score. Higher inflammation scores were also associated with an increased incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, particularly acute heart failure. This study underscores the association between the inflammation-based risk score and cytokine levels, specifically IL-6 and IP-10, in patients with STEMI.

Hepatic T1 Mapping as a Novel Cardio-Hepatic Axis Imaging Biomarker Early after STEMI.

BACKGROUND: The hepatic response after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may be associated with mortality and morbidity. We aimed to assess the cardio-hepatic axis post-STEMI using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: This prospective, observational, single-centre study included consecutive STEMI patients who underwent CMR after primary angioplasty from January 2015 to January 2019. Standard infarct characteristics were analysed, and hepatic T1 and hepatic extracellular volume (ECV) were assessed using pre- and post-contrast T1-mapping sequences. The primary endpoint was the relationship between native hepatic T1-values and ischemic right ventricular (RV) involvement, determined by RV ejection fraction (EF) dysfunction and/or the presence of RV acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The diagnostic performance of hepatic T1 values for detecting RV involvement was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Of 177 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing CMR, 142 were included. Patients with RV ischemic involvement, compared to those without, had significantly higher native hepatic T1 (p < 0.001) and hepatic ECV (p = 0.016). Hepatic T1 values demonstrated a good diagnostic performance in detecting RV involvement (AUC 0.826, p < 0.001) and correlated positively with NT-proBNP values (r = 0.754, p < 0.001). Patients with high hepatic T1 values (>605 ms) had significantly higher NT-proBNP levels (<0.001), larger RV end-diastolic volume (p < 0.001), lower RV-EF (p < 0.001), and a higher prevalence of RV AMI (p = 0.022) compared to those with hepatic T1 ≤ 605 ms, while left ventricular EF and infarct size were similar. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified RV-EF (p = 0.010) and NT-proBNP values (p < 0.001) as independent predictors of increased hepatic T1 values. Patients with increased hepatic T1 values had a higher rate of re-hospitalization for heart failure at 17-month follow-up (12.1% vs 2.0%, p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic T1 mapping has emerged as a possible novel imaging biomarker of the cardio-hepatic axis in STEMI, being associated with RV involvement and increased NT-proBNP values.

ECMO versus IABP for STEMI Patients Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock undergoing Primary PCI: A Chinese National Study and Propensity-matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the association between the utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and in-hospital mortality among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Data encompassing 9635 cases of STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock and treated with primary PCI using ECMO/IABP support were retrieved from the Chinese Cardiovascular Association database (2019-2021). We conducted an analysis to assess in-hospital survival disparities among percutaneous mechanical circulatory device recipients and explore the potential advantages of ECMO through multivariable logistic regression analysis within a propensity score-matched (1:2) cohort population. RESULTS: ECMO was administered to 2028 patients, while IABP was utilized in 7607 patients. Patients supported by ECMO showed a lower in-hospital mortality compared with those supported by IABP (7.2% vs. 15.1%, p<0.001). Within the propensity-matched (case : control=1:2) cohort, we noted a 34% reduced risk of in-hospital mortality among patients supported by ECMO compared to those supported by IABP (7.7% vs. 11.7%; odds ratio = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.80; p< 0.001) independent of age, sex, systolic blood pressure, obesity, smoke, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, family history of coronary artery disease, coronary artery disease, stroke, atrial filiation, peripheral artery disease, chronic kidney disease, vascular lesion sites, 3A-grade hospital, and regional distributions in China. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI complicated by cardiogenic shock, ECMO was associated with better in-hospital survival than IABP.

Prediction of left ventricular thrombus after myocardial infarction: a cardiac magnetic resonance-based prospective registry.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular thrombus (LVTh) is a severe complication after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). OBJECTIVES: We aim to predict LVTh occurrence by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) using clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic (ECG) variables readily available at admission. METHODS: We included 590 reperfused STEMI patients who underwent early (1-week) and/or late (6-month) CMR in our institution. Baseline clinical, echocardiographic (left ventricular ejection fraction -LVEF-) and ECG data (summatory of ST-segment elevation -sum-STE- and Q-wave and residual ST-elevation >1 mm -Q-STE-) during admission were registered. Multivariate binary logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves were computed for LVTh prediction. RESULTS: LVTh was detected by CMR in 43 (7.3 %) patients and was predicted by previous chronic coronary syndrome (CCS, HR 4.74 [1.82-12.35], p = 0.001), anterior STEMI (HR 10.93 [2.47-48.31], p = 0.002), LVEF (HR 0.96 [0.93-0.99] per %, p = 0.008), maximum sum-STE (HR 1.04 [1.01-1.07] per mm, p = 0.04), and Q-STE (HR 1.31 [1.08-1.6] per lead, p = 0.008). High-risk patients with both major (anterior STEMI and Q-STE in ≥1 leads) and 1-3 minor (CCS, maximum sum-STE >10 mm, LVEF <50%) factors showed the highest LVTh risk (19.6 % within 6 months). The model showed excellent discrimination ability (area under the curve=0.85 [0.81-0.9], p < 0.001). Simplified 4-variable (excluding sum-STE) and 3-variable (also excluding CCS) risk scores showed similar discrimination ability and were externally validated. CONCLUSIONS: LVTh within 6 months post-STEMI can be predicted using pre-discharge clinical (anterior infarction and CCS), echocardiographic (LVEF), and ECG (sum-STE and Q-STE) data. Our results can help select patients who should undergo CMR after STEMI for LVTh detection.

Reevaluate the effect of ACEI/ARB therapy at discharge on patients with STEMI in the contemporary reperfusion era.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) had beneficial effects on clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the pre-reperfusion or thrombolytic era. It is unknown if the benefits persist in the contemporary reperfusion era. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if ACEI/ARB improves clinical outcomes of patients with STEMI in the contemporary reperfusion era according to the reperfusion strategy. METHODS: 12596 patients were analyzed from the prospective, nationwide, multicenter China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) Registry. These patients were classified into the no reperfusion group (n=6004) and the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group (n=6592). Two-year all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were compared. RESULTS: In the no reperfusion group, ACEI/ARB therapy at discharge may reduce the incidences of 30-day MACCE (4.7% vs 7.4%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.85; P<0.001), stroke (0.5% vs 1.1%; adjusted HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.21-0.83; P=0.01), and revascularization (2.1% vs 3.1%; adjusted HR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.46-0.94; P=0.02) compared to patients not treated with ACEI/ARB. Patients treated with ACEI/ARB also showed a lower rate of two-year MACCE (17.0% versus 19.1%; adjusted HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.76-0.99; P=0.04). No differences were observed in the remaining outcomes. In the primary PCI group, no differences were observed for all examined outcomes before and after multivariate adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with ACEI/ARB at discharge may reduce cardiovascular events in STEMI patients not receiving reperfusion, while no significant benefits were observed in those receiving primary PCI.

Timeliness of reperfusion in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and outcomes in Kerala, India: results of the TRUST outcomes registry.

PURPOSE: Transatlantic guidelines endorse quality metrics for timely reperfusion in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Compliance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is largely unknown. STUDY DESIGN: We prospectively evaluated 2928 STEMI patients in Kerala, India, across 16 PCI-capable hospitals who received reperfusion with either primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or fibrinolysis. Primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke or readmission for heart failure at 1-year. RESULTS: Among reperfused STEMI patients, 320 (10.9%) received timely reperfusion with either PPCI or fibrinolysis, 1985 (67.8%) received delayed PPCI, and 623 (21.3%) received delayed fibrinolysis. Timely reperfusion had lower unadjusted MACE rates than delayed PCI or fibrinolysis (timely reperfusion: 11.9%, delayed PPCI: 13.6%, delayed fibrinolysis: 23.9%, P < 0.001). Mortality was lowest in the timely reperfusion group (timely reperfusion: 6.3%, delayed PPCI: 7.8%, delayed fibrinolysis 18.8%, P < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, delayed fibrinolysis had a higher MACE rate (HR 1.52 95% CI 1.04-2.21) and mortality (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.18-3.25) compared to timely reperfusion. Total ischemic time > 3 h and delayed first medical contact-to-needle time predicted MACE at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Among STEMI patients in Kerala, India, only one in 10 eligible patients received timely reperfusion. Longer total ischemic times and delayed fibrinolysis were associated with 1-year MACE. Improving timely reperfusion is critical to enhancing STEMI outcomes in LMICs. What is already known on this topic Given the established link between delay to reperfusion and worse major adverse cardiac events (MACE), global efforts have concentrated on minimizing different components of the total ischemic time to improve ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) outcomes. Compliance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is largely unknown. What this study adds In this cohort of STEMI patients in Kerala, India, total ischemic time and first medical contact-to-needle time correlated with long-term MACE rates, whereas other timeliness indicators did not. How this study might affect research, practice or policy Our study highlights the significant barriers to accessing STEMI care that are prevalent in LMICs despite incremental growth in the number of PCI-capable hospitals. The pre-hospital phase within total ischemic time is the most important quality improvement metric of STEMI care in LMICs, especially for patients chosen for fibrinolysis.

The triglyceride-glucose index is associated with no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients with type 2 diabetes after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Background: The relationship between the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between baseline TyG index and no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients with T2DM after PCI. Methods: This study enrolled 695 patients with T2DM and STEMI from the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University (2014-2019). Patients were divided into tertiles according to the TyG index levels. The incidence of no-reflow phenomenon was recorded. A multivariate regression model was developed to analyze the association between the baseline TyG index and no-reflow phenomenon. The linear association between the baseline TyG index and no-reflow phenomenon was explored using smooth curve fitting with parallel subgroup analyses. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the predictive power of the TyG index. Results: A multivariate logistic regression model revealed that the TyG index was an independent risk factor of no-reflow phenomenon [OR = 3.23, 95%CI: 2.15-4.86, P < 0.001], and the occurrence of no-reflow phenomenon increased gradually with the increase of TyG index tertile interval (P < 0.001). Smooth curve fitting showed that the TyG index was linearly related to the risk of no-reflow. Subgroup analysis showed that they participated in this positive correlation. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the TyG index for evaluating the occurrence of no-reflow was 0.710 (95% CI: 0.640-0.780; P < 0.01). Conclusions: The TyG index is independently associated with no-reflow phenomenon, suggesting that the simple index of the TyG index can be used for risk assessment of no-reflow phenomenon after PCI in STEMI patients with T2DM.

Establishment and validation of a nomogram model containing a triglyceride-glucose index and neutrophil-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio for predicting major adverse cardiac events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the predictive value of the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and neutrophil-to-high-density lipoprotein ratio (NHR) for in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and to establish an associated nomogram model. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we collected data from consecutive STEMI patients who underwent PCI from October 2019 to June 2023 at the Second People's Hospital of Hefei and the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, as training and validation sets. Stepwise regression and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to screen independent risk factors, and a nomogram model was constructed and evaluated for its predictive efficacy. RESULTS: The TyG index, NHR, urea, diastolic blood pressure, hypertension, and left ventricular ejection fraction were independent risk factors for in-hospital MACE after PCI, and were used to construct the nomogram model. The C-index of the training and validation sets were 0.799 and 0.753, respectively, suggesting that the model discriminated well. Calibration and clinical decision curves also demonstrated that the nomogram model had good predictive power. CONCLUSION: In STEMI patients, increased TyG index and NHR were closely related to the occurrence of in-hospital MACE after PCI. Our constructed nomogram model has some value for predicting the occurrence of in-hospital MACE in STEMI patients.

Complete vs Culprit-Only Revascularization in Older Patients With Myocardial Infarction With or Without ST-Segment Elevation.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of complete revascularization is well established in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but it is less investigated in those with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess whether complete revascularization, compared with culprit-only revascularization, was associated with consistent outcomes in older patients with STEMI and NSTEMI. METHODS: In the FIRE (Functional Assessment in Elderly MI Patients with Multivessel Disease) trial, 1,445 older patients with myocardial infarction (MI) were randomized to culprit-only or physiology-guided complete revascularization, stratified by STEMI (n = 256 culprit-only vs n = 253 complete) and NSTEMI (n = 469 culprit-only vs n = 467 complete). The primary outcome comprised a composite of death, MI, stroke, or revascularization at 1 year. The key secondary outcome included a composite of cardiovascular death or MI at 1 year. RESULTS: In the overall study population, physiology-guided complete revascularization reduced both primary and key secondary outcomes. The primary outcome occurred in 54 (21.1%) STEMI patients randomized to culprit-only vs 41 (16.2%) STEMI patients of the complete group (HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.50-1.13) and in 98 (20.9%) NSTEMI patients randomized to culprit-only vs 72 (15.4%) NSTEMI patients of the complete group (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.53-0.97), with negative interaction testing (P for interaction, 0.846). Similarly, no signal of heterogeneity with respect to the initial clinical presentation was observed for the key secondary endpoint (P for interaction, 0.654). CONCLUSIONS: Physiology-guided complete revascularization, compared with culprit-only revascularization, provided consistent benefit across the whole spectrum of patients with MI. (FIRE [Functional Assessment in Elderly MI Patients With Multivessel Disease]; NCT03772743).

Machine learning prediction of no reflow in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Background: No-reflow (NRF) phenomenon is a significant challenge in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Accurate prediction of NRF may help improve clinical outcomes of patients. This retrospective study aimed at creating an optimal model based on machine learning (ML) to predict NRF in these patients, with the additional objective of guiding pre- and intra-operative decision-making to reduce NRF incidence. Methods: Data were collected from 321 STEMI patients undergoing pPCI between January 2022 and May 2023, with the dataset being randomly divided into training and internal validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. Selected features included pre- and intra-operative demographic data, laboratory parameters, electrocardiogram, comorbidities, patients' clinical status, coronary angiographic data, and intraoperative interventions. Post comprehensive feature cleaning and engineering, three logistic regression (LR) models [LR-classic, LR-random forest (LR-RF), and LR-eXtreme Gradient Boosting (LR-XGB)], a RF model and an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model were developed within the training set, followed by performance evaluation on the internal validation sets. Results: Among the 261 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 212 were allocated to the normal flow group and 49 to the NRF group. The training group consisted of 183 patients, while the internal validation group included 78 patients. The LR-XGB model, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.829 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.779-0.880], was selected as the representative model for logistic regression analyses. The LR model had an AUC slightly lower than XGBoost model (AUC 0.835, 95% CI: 0.781-0.889) but significantly higher than RF model (AUC 0.731, 95% CI: 0.660-0.802). Internal validation underscored the unique advantages of each model, with the LR model demonstrating the highest clinical net benefit at relevant thresholds, as determined by decision curve analysis. The LR model encompassed seven meaningful features, and notably, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow after initial balloon dilation (TFAID) was the most impactful predictor in all models. A web-based application based on the LR model, hosting these predictive models, is available at https://l7173o-wang-lyn.shinyapps.io/shiny-1/. Conclusions: A LR model was successfully developed through ML to forecast NRF phenomena in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI. A web-based application derived from the LR model facilitates clinical implementation.

Seeing Bradycardia: How Ultrasound Improves Medical Decision-Making.

There is a broad differential for new-onset cardiac dysrhythmia, and the rapid identification of the underlying cause of these cardiac emergencies can be lifesaving. Identifying wall motion abnormalities on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is not a core echocardiography application for Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians. However, ruling in a regional wall motion abnormality can expedite patient-centered care and assist the busy EM physician in high-risk cases.

Geriatric conditions and invasive management in frail patients with NSTEMI. A subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Invasive management in frail patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains controversial. We investigated the impact of various geriatric conditions. METHODS: The MOSCA-FRAIL trial included 167 adults aged ≥ 70 years with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS] ≥ 4 points) and NSTEMI, who were randomized to either an invasive (n=84) or conservative (n=83) strategy. In addition to frailty, we measured activities of daily living (Barthel index), cognitive impairment (Pfeiffer test), and comorbidities (Charlson index). The primary endpoint was the difference (invasive minus conservative) in restricted mean survival time (RMST) for all-cause mortality at a median follow-up of 3.9 years. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients died. The RMST difference favored invasive management at the CFS 25th percentile (CFS=4; 157 days, 95%CI, 18-295; P=.027), which changed to a nonsignificant effect at the 50th and 75th percentiles. The RMST difference remained nonsignificant, irrespective of the severity of other geriatric assessments. In time-to-event analysis, invasive management was associated with an initially lower life expectancy, peaking at around 1 year, among all subgroups. However, patients with CFS=4 experienced a benefit at the end of follow-up (181 days, 95%CI, 19-343), whereas those with CFS >4 did not (-16 days, 95%CI, -217 to 186; interaction P=.16). Subgroups defined by other geriatric markers showed a similar time-dependent trend, albeit with weaker statistical interaction. CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with frailty and NSTEMI, the CFS might be useful for evaluating the relative risks and benefits of invasive management. A CFS >4 could serve as a valuable threshold for decision-making.

Association Between Patient and System Delays and In-Hospital Mortality in Primary PCI for STEMI: Findings from a Large, Nationwide Inpatients Sample.

PURPOSE: System delay is associated with mortality in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the influence of patient delay has been relatively overlooked. We aimed to evaluate the influence of patient and system delays on STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI in China. METHODS: STEMI patients registered at the Nationwide Chinese Cardiovascular Association Database-Chest Pain Center from January 2017 to September 2021 were screened. The exposures were total ischemic time (TIT), system delay and patient delay. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among 458,260 patients from 2529 centers, median TIT, system delay and patient delay were 4.1, 1.5 and 2.1 hours, respectively. The adjusted odds ratio of in-hospital mortality increased by 2.2% (odds ratio [OR], 1.022, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.017-1.027), 2.3% (1.023, 1.006-1.040) and 2.2% (1.022, 1.017-1.027) for every one-hour increase in TIT, system delay and patient delay, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patient delay demonstrated a comparable impact to system delay on in-hospital mortality among STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Widespread primary PCI-capable center, improved awareness about myocardial infarction and regional transfer system are essential to shorten patient delay.

Relationship Between Infarct Artery, Myocardial Injury, and Outcomes After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: The extent to which infarct artery impacts the extent of myocardial injury and outcomes in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention is uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a pooled analysis using individual patient data from 7 randomized STEMI trials in which myocardial injury within 30 days after primary percutaneous coronary intervention was assessed in 1774 patients by cardiac magnetic resonance (n=1318) or technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography (n=456). Clinical follow-up was performed at a median duration of 351 days (interquartile range, 184-368 days). Infarct size and outcomes were assessed in anterior (infarct vessel=left anterior descending) versus nonanterior (non-left anterior descending) STEMI. Median infarct size (percentage left ventricular myocardial mass) was larger in patients with anterior compared with nonanterior STEMI (19.7% [interquartile range, 9.4%-31.7%] versus 12.6% [interquartile range, 5.1%-20.5%]; P<0.001). Patients with anterior compared with nonanterior STEMI were at higher risk for 1-year all-cause mortality (6.2% versus 3.6%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.02-2.69]; P=0.04) and heart failure hospitalization (4.4% versus 2.6%; adjusted HR, 1.96 [95% CI, 1.15-3.36]; P=0.01). Infarct size was a predictor of subsequent all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization in anterior STEMI (adjusted HR per 1% increase, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.03-1.07]; P<0.001), but not in nonanterior STEMI (adjusted HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.99-1.05]; P=0.19). The P value for this interaction was 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior STEMI was associated with substantially greater myonecrosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention compared with nonanterior STEMI, contributing in large part to the worse prognosis in patients with anterior infarction.

Determinants of In-hospital Death in Non-ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction with Triple-vessel Disease.

Objective Triple-vessel disease (TVD) is a well-established prognostic factor for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, there is a paucity of literature regarding the risk factors for in-hospital death in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and TVD. In this retrospective study, we examined the determinants of in-hospital death in patients with NSTEMI and TVD who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for culprit lesions. Methods The primary objective of this study was to identify the factors associated with in-hospital death using a multivariate analysis. We included 253 patients with NSTEMI and TVD and divided them into a survivor group (n=239) and an in-hospital death group (n=14). Results Systolic blood pressure (SBP) at admission was significantly higher in the survivor group than in the in-hospital death group. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was also higher in the survivor group than in the in-hospital death group. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, in-hospital death was inversely associated with the SBP at admission (odds ratio [OR] 0.984, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.970-0.999, p<0.035) and eGFR (OR 0.966, 95% CI 0.939-0.994, p=0.019) and was associated with cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) before PCI (OR 8.448, 95%CI 1.863-38.309, p=0.006). Conclusion In-hospital death was associated with CPA before PCI and inversely associated with the SBP at admission and eGFR in patients with NSTEMI and TVD who underwent PCI for the culprit lesion. It may be important to recognize these high-risk features in order to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with NSTEMI and TVD.

Comparative Study of Laboratory Versus Bedside High-Sensitivity Troponin I in the Emergency Medicine Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital in India.

BACKGROUND:  Evaluating high-sensitivity troponin I levels in emergency medicine is critical for diagnosing acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aims to evaluate the central laboratory versus bedside troponin I test in the emergency department of a tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHODS:  This prospective observational study was conducted at Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India, from October to December 2023. Patient samples were analyzed in the central laboratory using the Dimension EXL 200 (Siemens® Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Erlangen, Germany) as the gold standard test and through point-of-care testing using the TriageTrue® (Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA) high-sensitivity troponin I kit, which was run on the Triage® MeterPro® device (Quidel Corporation, San Diego, CA). This device quantitatively determines troponin I in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-anticoagulated whole blood and plasma specimens. The results were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). An unpaired t-test was performed to compare the difference in time taken using the two testing methods. RESULT:  The mean time for obtaining troponin I results was substantially shorter with bedside testing (14.91 minutes, standard deviation (SD) = 0.5) than with laboratory testing (119.1 minutes, SD = 5.03). Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference (t = -172.36, p < 0.001). A chi-square test was conducted to assess the disparity between the two testing methods, yielding a chi-square value of 32.64 and a p value of 0.00001, indicating a significant difference between bedside testing and laboratory testing. CONCLUSION: The bedside high-sensitivity troponin I test offers a considerable advantage over laboratory testing regarding turnaround time within the emergency medicine department in India. This rapid diagnostic capability is crucial for timely management, which is beneficial for patients inconclusive of acute coronary syndrome-like non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). It is also cost-effective. It also reduces the emergency boarding time and may reduce the number of unnecessary admissions in healthcare facilities.

Right ventricular function and determining factors of dysfunction in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional study with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Background: Over the past few decades, left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has been the focus of research. Recently, co-occurring right ventricular (RV) dysfunction has received more attention in clinical practice. We aimed to assess RV function using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and identify factors that may contribute to RV dysfunction in STEMI patients. Methods: We retrospectively studied 189 patients with STEMI who underwent CMR 1-7 days after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The ejection fraction (EF), wall thickening rate (WTR), peak radial strain (RS), circumferential strain (CS) and longitudinal strain (LS) of the LV, interventricular septum (IVS) and RV were measured with cine images. The location and extent of the infarct were determined using late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. The differences of function between STEMI patients with right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) <50% and those with RVEF ≥50% were compared using an independent-sample t-test. Linear regression analyses were used to determine independent predictors of RVEF. Results: RVEF <50% was observed in 32.28%% STEMI patients, who also demonstrated significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), WTR, RS, CS, LS and larger infarct sizes than those with RVEF ≥50%. Patients with RVEF <50% also demonstrated a higher incidence of RV infarction, higher RV end-systolic volume (ESV) index, and lower RV RS and CS. Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed LV EF, IVS WTR and IVS RS as significant predictors for RVEF, while male gender, the culprit lesion in the right coronary artery (RCA), peak troponin were negative predictors for RVEF. Notably, peak troponin, LV EF, LV RS, LV CS, LV WTR, and IVS WTR demonstrated higher area under the curve (AUC) values for predicting RV dysfunction. Conclusions: RV dysfunction was detected in 32.28% of STEMI patients. Patients with acute STEMI and RVEF <50% had impaired LV and IVS functions. Systolic function of the LV and IVS, peak troponin, and culprit lesions in the RCA were independent predictors of RV dysfunction in STEMI patients.

The optimal timing for intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: The optimal timing for nonculprit vascular reconstruction surgery in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary disease (MVD) is still controversial. Our aim was to explore the optimal intervention time for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in STEMI patients who underwent MVD. Methods: The PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from inception to January 1, 2024 for clinical studies comparing immediate multivessel PCI and staged multivessel PCI in patients with STEMI. The primary outcomes were death from any cause, cardiovascular death, noncardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI) and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization. The secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke, stent thrombosis, renal dysfunction and major bleeding. The risk ratios (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated with fixed-effects models and random-effects models, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Findings: Five randomized trials with 2,782 patients and six prospective observational studies with 3,131 patients were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The staged PCI group had significantly lower pooled RRs for myocardial infarction (0.43, 95% CI = 0.27-0.67; P = 0.0002) and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization (0.57, 95% CI = 0.41-0.78; P = 0.0004). There were no significant differences in any cause of death, cardiovascular cause of death, or noncardiac cause of death. However, the results of prospective observational studies in the real world indicated that the staged PCI group had significantly lower pooled ORs for all-cause mortality (2.30, 95% CI = 1.22-4.34; P = 0.01), cardiovascular death (2.29, 95% CI = 1.10-4.77; P = 0.03), and noncardiovascular death (3.46, 95% CI = 1.40-8.56; P = 0.007). Implications: According to our randomized trial analysis, staged multivessel PCI significantly reduces the risk of myocardial infarction and unplanned ischemia-driven revascularization compared to immediate multivessel PCI. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or noncardiovascular mortality risk. However, prospective non-randomized studies suggest there might be a benefit in mortality in the staged PCI group. Therefore, staged multivessel PCI may be the optimal PCI strategy for STEMI patients with MVD.

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction outcomes based on left ventricular ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: We assessed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to compare the effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI) in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS: We categorized 4558 patients with NSTEMI as either RASI users (3752 patients) or non-users (806 patients). The 3-year patient-oriented composite outcome (POCO), which included all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, any repeat revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure (HF), was the primary outcome. To compare clinical outcomes, a multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was calculated after performing multicollinearity tests on all significant confounding variables (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Among RASI users, the aHRs for POCO, all-cause death, and cardiac death were significantly higher in the HF with reduced EF (HFrEF) subgroup than in the HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF) (1.610, 2.120, and 2.489; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001; respectively) and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) (2.234, 3.920, and 5.215; P < 0.001, <0.001, and <0.001; respectively) subgroups. The aHRs for these variables were significantly higher in the HFmrEF subgroup than the HFpEF subgroup (1.416, 1.843, and 2.172, respectively). Among RASI non-users, the aHRs for these variables were significantly higher in the HFrEF subgroup than the HFmrEF (2.573, 3.172, and 3.762, respectively) and HFpEF (2.425, 3.805, and 4.178, respectively) subgroups. In three LVEF subgroups, RASI users exhibited lower aHRs for POCO and all-cause death than RASI non-users. CONCLUSION: In the RASI users group, the aHRs for POCO and mortality were highest in the HFrEF subgroup, intermediate in the HFmrEF subgroup, and lowest in the HFpEF subgroup.