Analysis of odontoid parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with different curve types.

Introduction: Odontoid incidence (OI) is an important parameter that has recently been developed. However, there are currently no studies on OI in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. We aimed to examine the significance of OI in describing cervical sagittal alignment in AIS patients, explore the differences in cervical sagittal parameters among these patients with different curve types, and investigate the correlations between coronal deformity and cervical sagittal parameters in AIS patients. Methods: The whole-spine anteroposterior and lateral plain radiographs of AIS patients were retrospectively analyzed. The parameters, including OI, odontoid tilt (OT), C2 slope, cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope (T1S), and others, were measured. The AIS patients were grouped based on different curve types. Measurement parameters were compared between different groups. Pearson correlation analysis was performed for cervical sagittal parameters and Cobb angle. Results: Ninety AIS patients were included, consisting of 14 males and 76 females. The main thoracic curve group exhibited a smaller OI compared to the main thoracolumbar/lumbar curve group (P < 0.05). In the AIS patients with a main thoracic curve, there was a significant correlation between Cobb angle and OI (r = -0.371, p < 0.01). The odontoid parameters exhibited significant correlations with several classic cervical sagittal parameters in AIS patients with different curve types. The validation of the formula CL = 0.36 × OI-0.67 × OT-0.69 × T1S showed a significant correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.917) between the actual measurements and the predicted values, with a determination coefficient of 0.842. Conclusion: There may be a difference in OI between AIS patients with a main thoracic curve and those with a main thoracolumbar/lumbar curve. Odontoid parameters could be used to describe cervical sagittal alignment in AIS patients with different curve types.

The Impact of Preoperative Sagittal Imbalance on Long-term Postoperative Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Laminectomy.

Background: Postoperative sagittal alignment has been shown to be associated with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following open lumbar decompression procedures, although it is unknown whether preoperative sagittal imbalance affects clinical outcomes of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) decompression only surgery. Purpose: We sought to evaluate the impact of preoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) imbalance on PROMs after MIS laminectomy for the treatment of neurogenic claudication symptoms. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing MIS laminectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis between April 2017 and April 2021 at a single institution. Of the 52 patients included (mean follow-up, 17 months) radiographs were taken prior to surgery and assessed for sagittal alignment parameters. Patients were grouped based on the preoperative PI-LL (balanced vs unbalanced). Changes in PROMs were compared between unbalanced PI-LL and balanced PI-LL groups. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was also assessed. Results: Of the 52 patients, 17 (32.7%) had unbalanced age-adjusted preoperative PI-LL. There was no significant difference found in PROMs between unbalanced and balanced PI-LL groups preoperatively or at final follow-up. Compared with those with unbalanced PI-LL, patients with balanced PI-LL were shown to have no added benefit in achieving MCID for ODI at long-term follow-up and no added benefit in the time to achieving MCID. Conclusion: These retrospective findings suggest that patients with unbalanced preoperative PI-LL may experience significant benefit in long-term clinical outcomes following MIS laminectomy, similarly to those with balanced PI-LL at baseline. The findings also suggest that the presence of sagittal imbalance preoperatively may not appreciably influence the long-term clinical outcomes following MIS laminectomy. Prospective study involving a larger population is warranted.

Sequential correction of sagittal vertical alignment and lumbar lordosis in adult flatback deformity.

Background: Flatback deformity, or lumbar hypolordosis, can cause sagittal imbalance, causing back pain, fatigue, and functional limitation. Surgical correction through osteotomies and interbody fusion techniques can restore sagittal balance and relieve pain. This study investigated sagittal vertical alignment (SVA) and lumbar lordosis correction achieved through sequential procedures on human spine specimens. Methods: Human T10-sacrum specimens were stratified into 2 groups: degenerative flatback specimens had smaller L1-S1 lordosis compared to the iatrogenic group (26.1°±15.0° vs. 47.8°±19.3°, p<.05). Specimens were mounted in the apparatus in simulated standing posture with a nominal sacral slope of 45 degrees and subjected to a 400N compressive follower preload. Sequential correction of degenerative lumbar flatback deformity involved: anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) at L5-S1, ALIF at L4-5, lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) at L2-3 and L3-4, and posterior column osteotomy (PCO) at L2-3 and L3-4. In iatrogenic specimens, flatback deformity was created by performing a posterior in-situ immobilization using pedicle screw instrumentation at L4-L5-S1 followed by distraction across the pedicle screws. We then performed LLIF at L2-3 and L3-4, followed by PCO at L2-3 and L3-4. Results: Statistically significant incremental corrections were noted in SVAs and lordosis after L5-S1 ALIF, L4-5 ALIF, and PCO in degenerative flatback specimens. For the iatrogenic group, statistically significant worsening was noted in measures of standing alignment after L4-L5-S1 hypolordotic fusion. Subsequent LLIF at L2-3 and L3-4 did not significantly improve sagittal alignment. However, after PCO at L2-3 and L3-4, final alignment parameters were not significantly different than preoperative baseline values prior to hypolordotic fusion. Conclusions: ALIF cages in the lower lumbar segments significantly improved sagittal alignment in degenerative flatback specimens. In the upper lumbar segments, LLIF cages alone were ineffective at enhancing lumbar lordosis. LLIF cages in conjunction with PCO improved alignment parameters in degenerative and iatrogenic flatback deformities.

Risk factors and clinical significance of posterior slip of the proximal vertebral body after lower lumbar fusion.

BACKGROUND: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) after fusion surgery is frequently manifests as a cranial segment instability, disc herniation, spinal canal stenosis, spondylolisthesis or retrolisthesis. The risk factors and mechanisms of ASD have been widely discussed but never clearly defined. AIM: To investigate the risk factors and clinical significance of retrograde movement of the proximal vertebral body after lower lumbar fusion. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery between September 2015 and July 2021 and who were followed up for more than 2 years. Ninety-one patients with degenerative lumbar diseases were included (22 males and 69 females), with an average age of 52.3 years (40-73 years). According to whether there was retrograde movement of the adjacent vertebral body on postoperative X-rays, the patients were divided into retrograde and nonretrograde groups. The sagittal parameters of the spine and pelvis were evaluated before surgery, after surgery, and at the final follow-up. At the same time, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the patients' quality of life. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (20.9%) who experienced retrograde movement of proximal adjacent segments were included in this study. The pelvic incidence (PI) of the patients in the retrograde group were significantly higher than those of the patients in the nonretrograde group before surgery, after surgery and at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in lumbar lordosis (LL) between the two groups before the operation, but LL in the retrograde group was significantly greater than that in the nonretrograde group postoperatively and at the final follow-up. No significant differences were detected in terms of the |PI-LL|, and there was no significant difference in the preoperative lordosis distribution index (LDI) between the two groups. The LDIs of the retrograde group were 68.1% ± 11.5% and 67.2% ± 11.9%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those of the nonretrograde group (75.7% ± 10.4% and 74.3% ± 9.4%, respectively) (P < 0.05). Moreover, the patients in the retrograde group had a greater incidence of a LDI < 50% than those in the nonretrograde group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the ODI or VAS scores between the two groups before the operation, but the ODI and VAS scores in the retrograde group were significantly worse than those in the nonretrograde group after the operation and at the last follow-up, (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The incidence of posterior slippage after lower lumbar fusion was approximately 20.9%. The risk factors are related to a higher PI and distribution of lumbar lordosis. When a patient has a high PI and insufficient reconstruction of the lower lumbar spine, adjacent segment compensation via posterior vertebral body slippage is one of the factors that significantly affects surgical outcomes.

Pediatric spinal alignment and spinal development.

Background: Knowledge of the growth spurt and remaining growth is essential for managing musculoskeletal diseases in children. Accurate prediction of curve progression and timely interventions are crucial, particularly for conditions like adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods: This study conducted a comprehensive review and synthesis of existing literature on spinal growth, skeletal maturity classifications, and the evolution of sagittal alignment parameters during childhood and adolescence. Key anatomical elements involved in spinal development, natural history of spinal growth, and skeletal maturity assessment systems were analyzed. Results: The analysis highlighted that key parameters such as Pelvic incidence (PI), Pelvic tilt (PT), and Lumbar lordosis (LL) increase significantly with growth, especially during the pubertal growth spurt. In contrast, Sacral slope (SS) remains relatively constant, and Thoracic kyphosis (TK) shows a slight increase. Additionally, there is a posterior shift in the center of gravity as children grow, reflecting progressive postural maturation. The study also reviewed and compared various maturity classification systems, noting the reliability and clinical implications of systems like the Sanders Maturity Stage (SMS) and Tanner-Whitehouse III. Conclusions: Reliable maturity classification systems, such as the Sanders Maturity Stage (SMS) and Tanner-Whitehouse III, allow for tailored treatments to individual growth patterns. Integrating these classification systems into clinical practice enables precise prediction of curve progression and timely therapeutic interventions. This includes options from bracing to surgical techniques like growing rods or vertebral body tethering (VBT), with growth modulation being a key factor in achieving successful outcomes.

Relationship between spinal alignment and functional disability after thoracolumbar spinal fractures: A systematic review.

Background: Thoracolumbar spinal fractures (TLSF) can cause pain, neurological deficits, and functional disability. Operative treatments aim to preserve neurological function, improve functional status, and restore spinal alignment and stability. In this review, we evaluate the relationship between spinal alignment and functional impairment in patients with TLSF. Methods: We performed a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to identify full-text articles that evaluate the correlation between spinal alignment and functional outcomes of TLSF. The artificial intelligence software Rayyan assisted the screening process. Functional outcomes referred to activity/disability, quality of life, and pain scores, as well as return to work metrics. Radiological assessments included were vertebral compression angle, Cobb and Gardner angles, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt. Statistical analyses were performed for the data provided by articles using the SPSS v24. Results: Of 1,616 articles reviewed, 6 were included for final analysis. Only 1 study primarily addressed the effects of spinopelvic parameters and functional outcomes. Four studies correlated Cobb angles with functional outcome, while 3 others compared vertebral compression angles with functional outcomes. Outcomes were assessed using work status or a combination of VAS pain and spine score, ODI, SF-36, and RMDQ-24. Neither the analysis done within the articles, nor the one made with the raw data provided by them, showed a significant correlation between the radiological measurements assessed at time of injury and final functional outcomes. Conclusions: A correlation between the assessed spinal radiological measurements assessed with the functional outcomes of TLSF was not found in this review. Further well-designed prospective studies are necessary to evaluate spinal alignment measurements in TLSF with functional outcomes.

Strategic Surgical Intervention in a Rare Presentation of Hip-Spine Syndrome With Lumbosacral Malunion: A Case Report.

The hip and lumbar spine are closely related and can create similar patterns of pain and dysfunction. Furthermore, diagnosing and treating hip and spine conditions can be challenging due to the overlap of symptoms. This report describes the successful treatment of a 54-year-old male with hip-spine syndrome following multiple surgeries for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. The patient presented with low back pain (LBP) and bilateral hip pain, with radiological findings indicating spinal deformity and hip joint synovitis. Two years after two-stage corrective surgery, including pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), the hip synovitis resolved and the symptoms improved. This case emphasizes the need to consider hip-spine syndrome as a possible complication of lumbosacral spine fusion surgery and demonstrates the efficacy of two-stage corrective surgery with pedicle subtraction osteotomy in treating this condition.

The Effect of Global Spinal Alignment on Cervical Degeneration in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the effect of global spinal alignment on cervical degeneration in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). METHODS: This study included 117 patients with DLS and 42 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis as a control group. Patients with DLS (study group) were categorized according to the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification. Spinopelvic parameters were measured in cervical and full-length spine radiographs. Cervical degeneration was assessed using the cervical degeneration index (CDI) scoring system. RESULTS: There were significant differences in C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic tilt between DLS and control groups. Although the DLS and control groups did not differ significantly with regard to CDI scores, a striking difference was noted when sagittal spinopelvic modifiers were considered individually. Patients with a pelvic incidence (PI)-LL mismatch modifier grade of ++ had significantly higher CDI scores than patients with grade 0, and patients with a PI-LL or sagittal vertical axis modifier grade of ++ had significantly higher CDI scores than the control group. Disk narrowing scores were highest in patients with a PI-LL modifier grade of ++ followed by patients with a grade of +. Additionally, CDI scores were more associated with LL rather than cervical lordosis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DLS may be at greater risk of cervical spine degeneration, especially patients with a PI-LL or sagittal vertical axis modifier grade of ++. A surgical strategy for patients with DLS should be carefully selected considering the restoration of LL.

Camptocormia in Parkinson Disease: Systematic Review of Management Using Spine Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Postural abnormalities are a debilitating symptom of Parkinson disease (PD) that may require spinal intervention. Camptocormia is a unique abnormality most seen in PD, defined by a severe forward flexion of the trunk that completely resolves when supine. The condition presents a challenge due to an undefined pathophysiology and optimal therapeutic approach in a high-risk patient population. In this study, we systematically reviewed the literature regarding the use of spine surgery for the treatment of camptocormia in PD. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically queried for studies involving spine surgery as treatment of PD-associated camptocormia. Studies involving nonsurgical management, involving deep brain stimulation, involving noncamptocormic PD patients undergoing surgery, or were out of scope were excluded. RESULTS: The search resulted in 5 studies, with a total of 19 patients with PD with camptocormia who underwent spine surgery (73.7% women). The mean age was 69.5 years (range, 59-83), and the mean PD duration was 69.5 months (range, 36-84). Of 19 patients, 11 required surgical revision (57.9%), with an average of 0.68 revisions per patient (range, 0-2). Radiographic and patient-reported outcomes were inconsistently reported yet showed improvement. Ultimately, 18 patients were reported to have positive outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an increased risk of complication and revision that is inherent to patients with PD, spine surgery has been proven as a reasonable alternative that should be prospectively studied further because 18 of 19 patients had favorable outcomes.

Influence of the type of atlantoaxial dislocation secondary to os odontoideum on sagittal alignment and balance of the subaxial cervical spine after posterior atlantoaxial fusion.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aims to investigate the effect of the type of atlantoaxial dislocation due to os odontoideum on the sagittal alignment and balance of the cervical spine after posterior atlantoaxial fusion. METHODS: Data of 48 consecutive patients who underwent posterior C1-C2 fusion to treat atlantoaxial dislocation/instability due to os odontoideum were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic variables, namely the T1 slope (T1S), C1-C2 angle, C2-C7 angle, C1-C2 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C2-C7 SVA, and modified atlas-dens interval (MADI), were measured preoperatively, immediate postoperatively, and at final follow-up. Patients were divided into three groups based on the preoperative MADI. Differences within and between groups in radiographic variables and relationships between the investigated variables were analyzed. RESULTS: The MADI was correlated with the preoperative to postoperative changes in the C1-C2 angle (r = 0.776, P < 0.05) and C2-C7 angle (r = - 0.357, P < 0.05). In the group with anterior atlantoaxial dislocation, the C1-C2 angle and C2-C7 SVA were significantly enlarged at final follow-up (P < 0.05), while the C2-C7 angle was significantly reduced (P < 0.05). The changes in C1-C2 angle and C2-C7 angle were opposite between the posterior group and the anterior dislocation group. CONCLUSION: The direction/type of atlantoaxial subluxation correlates with the changes in lower cervical curvature after atlantoaxial fusion. Patients with atlantoaxial posterior dislocation and atlantoaxial instability are less likely than those with atlantoaxial anterior dislocation to develop loss of lordosis after posterior atlantoaxial fusion.

Influence of cranium orientation on cervical sagittal alignment during radiographic examination: a radiographic analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: During the radiographic examination, the cranium orientation varies not only individually but also within the same subject, in different imaging sessions. Knowing how changes in the orientation of the cranium influences cervical sagittal alignment during the radiographic examination of the cervical spine can aid clinicians in the accurate evaluation for cervical sagittal alignment in clinical practice. PURPOSE: To radiographically examine the influence of cranium orientation on cervical sagittal alignment during radiographic examination in an asymptomatic cohort. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective radiographic study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Eighty asymptomatic volunteers (mean age, 40.4 years; 50.0% male) were enrolled. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cervical sagittal parameters including the regional slope (C1 slope, C2 slope, C5 slope, C7 slope, and T1 slope), Cobb angle (O-C1 angle, C1-C2 angle, C2-C5 angle, C5-C7 angle, and C7-T1 angle), and cranial/cervical offset (sella turcica tilt [ST tilt] and C2 tilt). METHODS: In all participants, standing lateral radiographs of the cervical spine were taken in 3 forward-gazing positions: anteverted-cranium (AC) position; neutral-cranium (NC) position; and retroverted-cranium (RC) position. Cervical sagittal parameters, including the regional slope, Cobb angle, and cranial/cervical offset, in these 3 positions were statistically compared. RESULTS: The C1 and C2 slopes were anteverted and retroverted in the AC and RC positions, respectively, compared to those in the NC position. The C5 slope, C7 slope, and T1 slope were constant among the 3 positions. In O-C2 and C2-C5, statistically significant differences in the regional Cobb angles were identified among the 3 positions; however, there were no significant differences in the C5-C7 or C7-T1 segments. Cranial and cervical offsets of ST tilt and C2 tilt increased and decreased when the cranium was anteverted and retroverted, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that the adjustment of the cranium orientation when taking cervical spine radiographs is mainly controlled at the upper cervical spine of the O-C2 segment in an asymptomatic cohort. On radiograph, alignment in the upper cervical segment of O-C2 changes; accordingly, the middle cervical segment of C2-C5 can change during the adjustment of cranium orientation. However, alignment in the lower cervical segment of C5-C7 and the cervicothoracic junction of C7-T1 remains constant. Further, cranial/cervical offset increases and decreases when the cranium is anteverted and retroverted, respectively. Our results can help the accurate evaluation of cervical sagittal alignment on plain radiographs in clinical practice.

Cranial sagittal vertical axis to the hip as the best sagittal alignment predictor of patient-reported outcomes at 2 years postoperatively in adult spinal deformity surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to discern whether the cranial sagittal vertical axis (CrSVA) can best predict the trajectory of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 2 years postoperatively. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected adult spinal deformity patient data. CrSVA relative to the sacrum, hip (CrSVA-H), knee, and ankle was measured as the horizontal distance to the vertical plumb line from the nasion-inion midpoint, with positive values indicating an anterior cranium. Standard sagittal alignment parameters were also collected. Outcome variables were PROMs as measured by Scoliosis Research Society-22r questionnaire (SRS-22r) total and subdomain scores and the Oswestry Disability Index. Pearson's correlation coefficients and univariate regressions were performed to investigate associations between predictors and PROMs. Two conceptual multivariable linear regression models for each 2-year outcome measure were built after adjusting for the impact of preoperative SRS-22r scores. Model 1 assessed pre- and postoperative alignment only relative to C2 and C7, while model 2 assessed alignment relative to C2 and C7 as well as the cranium. RESULTS: There was a total of 363 patients with 2 years of radiographic and PROM follow-up (68.0% female, mean [standard error of the mean] age 60.8 [0.78] years, BMI 27.5 [0.29], and total number of instrumented levels 12.8 [0.22]). CrSVA measures were significantly associated with the 2-year SRS-22r total and subdomain scores. In univariate regression, revision surgery, number of prior surgeries, frailty, BMI, total number of osteotomies, and lower baseline total SRS-22r score as well as postoperative sagittal alignment were significantly associated with worse 2-year SRS-22r scores. In multivariable regression, after adjusting for baseline SRS-22r scores, greater preoperative C2 to sacrum sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and C7 SVA were found to be the only independent predictors of 2-year total SRS-22r score (ß = -0.011 [p = 0.0026] and ß = 0.009 [p = 0.0211], respectively) when alignment was considered only relative to C2. However, in the subsequent model, CrSVA-H replaced C7 SVA as the independent factor driving postoperative SRS-22r total scores (ß = -0.006, p < 0.0001). That is, when the model included alignment relative to the cranium, C2, and C7, greater or more anterior CrSVA-H resulted in worse SRS-22r scores, while smaller or more posterior CrSVA-H resulted in better scores. Similar models for subdomains again found CrSVA-H to be the best predictor of function (ß = -0.0095, p < 0.0001), pain (ß = -0.0091, p < 0.0001), self-image (ß = -0.0084, p = 0.0004), and mental health (ß = -0.0059, p = 0.0026). CONCLUSIONS: In multivariable regression, C7 SVA was supplanted by CrSVA-H alignment as a significant, independent predictor of 2-year SRS-22r scores in patients with adult spinal deformity and should be considered as one of the standard postoperative sagittal alignment target goals.

Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Grading: Current Standards and Important Factors to Consider for Management.

Spondylolisthesis is a common condition with a prevalence of 4-6% in childhood and 5-10% in adulthood. The Meyerding Classification, developed in 1932, assigns grades (I to V) based on the degree of slippage observed on standing, neutral lateral lumbar radiographs. Despite its historical significance and reliability, more factors should be evaluated to predict spondylolisthesis progression, especially in low-grade cases. The manuscript highlights areas for improvement in spondylolisthesis classification, emphasizing the need for considering factors beyond vertebral slippage. Factors such as global and segmental alignment, pelvic incidence, overhang, the number of affected levels, and the use of lateral flexion-extension radiographs to assess for stability using the kyphotic angle and slippage degree are identified as crucial in predicting progression and determining effective management strategies.

Can pelvic incidence affect changes in sagittal spino-pelvic parameters between standing and sitting positions in individuals with lumbar degenerative disease?

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the correlation between PI and standing-to-sitting changes of the sagittal alignment in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases, and investigate the differences in posture changes among Roussouly types. METHODS: A total of 209 patients with lumbar degenerative disease were retrospectively included in this study. All the patients received lateral full body imaging in both standing and sitting positions. Sagittal parameters including SVA, OD-HA, PT, PI, PT/PI, SS, LL, TK, Upper LL (L1-L4) and Lower LL (L4-S1) were measured in both standing and sitting position, and the parameters were compared between two positions. The correlations between PI and lumbo-pelvic changes were analyzed. The postural changes were compared among different Roussouly types. RESULTS: From standing to sitting, all the parameters except PI significantly changed, including SVA, OD-HA, PT, PT/PI, SS, LL, TK, Upper LL and Lower LL. The contribution of lower LL was greater to global LL than upper LL. PI had a significant correlation with ΔPT, ΔSS, ΔLL, ΔUpper LL and ΔLower LL. From standing to sitting, type 4 patients had the most pronounced ΔPT, ΔSS and ΔLL, and ΔLower LL of types 3 and 4 were greater than that of types 1 and 2. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with degenerative disease, PI plays an important role in determining the extent of lumbo-pelvic changes from standing to sitting. Among different Roussouly types, type 4 patients have the most pronounced changes of PT, SS and LL, suggesting the relatively greater flexibility of pelvis and lumbar spine.

Is cervical sagittal alignment associated with pain and disability in myofascial pain syndrome?: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the role of cervical sagittal alignment in the pathophysiology of cervical myofascial pain syndrome(MFPS) and its impact on pain levels and disability status among patients. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study included participants aged 18-64 years experiencing neck pain for more than 3 months and diagnosed with MFPS. Cervical sagittal parameters (C0-2 cervical lordosis(CL) angle, C2-7 CL angle, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope, T1 slope minus CL mismatch(T1S-CL), and cervical tilt) were measured using Surgimap software by an expert physiatrist. Pain levels were assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale(NRS), and neck disability was evaluated using the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire(NBQ). RESULTS: Out of 200 initially assessed participants with cervical MFPS, 133 were included after excluding ineligible individuals. The mean age of the participants was 35.3±8.2 years. Participants categorized by pain severity (moderate vs. severe) showed no significant differences in cervical range of motion, C0-2 angle, cSVA, T1 slope and T1S-CL. However, significant differences were observed in C2-7 angle (p=0.008), cervical tilt (p=0.006), and NBQ scores (p<0.001) between the two pain severity groups. Grouping based on T1S-CL compliance showed no significant differences in pain and disability effects. Correlation analysis revealed weak negative correlations between pain levels and C2-7 Cobb angle (p=0.009, r=0.226) as well as cervical tilt (p=0.005, r=0.243). No correlations were found between cervical sagittal parameters and NBQ scores. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased C2-7 CL angle and cervical tilt angle are associated with increased pain levels; however, cervical sagittal alignment was not found to be associated with disability.

Longitudinal impact of multi-segment spinal fixation surgery on mobility status and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity: a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To investigate changes in postoperative mobility status in patients with ASD, and the determining factors that influence these changes and their impact on clinical outcomes, including the rate of home discharge and long-term mobility. METHODS: A total of 299 patients with ASD who underwent multi-segment posterior spinal fusion were registered in a multi-center database were investigated. Patient mobility status was assessed using walking aids and classified into five levels (1: independent, 2: cane, 3: walker, 4: assisted, and 5: wheelchair) preoperatively, at discharge, and after 2 years. We determined improvements or declines in the patient's mobility based on changes in the classification levels. The analysis focused on the factors contributing to the deterioration of postoperative mobility. RESULTS: Two years postoperatively, 87% of patients maintained or improved mobility. However, 27% showed decreased mobility status at discharge, associated with a lower rate of home discharge (49% vs. 80% in the maintained mobility group) and limited improvement in mobility status (35% vs. 5%) after 2 years. Notably, postoperative increases in thoracic kyphosis (7.0 ± 12.1 vs. 2.0 ± 12.4°, p = 0.002) and lower lumbar lordosis (4.2 ± 13.1 vs. 1.8 ± 12.6°, p = 0.050) were substantial factors in mobility decline. CONCLUSION: Postoperative mobility often temporarily decreases but generally improves after 2 years. However, an overcorrection in sagittal alignment, evidenced by increased TK, could detrimentally affect patients' mobility status. Transient mobility decline associated with overcorrection may require further rehabilitation or hospitalization. Further studies are required to determine the biomechanical effects of surgical correction on mobility.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of the femoro-sacral posterior angle system for measuring spino-pelvic morphology in high-dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE: The Femoro-Sacral Posterior Angle (FSPA) system and the pelvic incidence (PI) system are utilized for measuring sagittal spino-pelvic morphology in patients with high-dysplastic developmental spondylolisthesis (HDDS). This study aimed to analyze the accuracy and stability of these two systems. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 45 patients diagnosed with HDDS who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital (HDDS group), along with 45 patients without spondylolisthesis (normal group). Three orthopedic surgeons utilized the FSPA and PI systems to measure various parameters, including FSPA, pelvic angle(PA), sacral incidence (SI), PI, pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was employed to assess the inter-observer consistency of measurements. RESULTS: There was significant differences in all the parameters between the normal and HDDS groups (p < 0.05), except for SS (p = 0.508). Specifically, SI was lower in HDDS group than in the normal group (23.0 ± 13.4 vs. 38.6 ± 7.1), whereas SS was higher (35.3 ± 15.7 vs. 33.6 ± 7.4). Within HDDS group, there was no statistically significant difference in PI (p = 0.159), SS (p = 0.319), and FSPA (p = 0.173) between pre- and post-surgery measurements. The ICC results indicated superior reliability for the FSPA system (0.842-0.885) compared to the PI system (0.682-0.720) within the HDDS group. CONCLUSION: Compared with the PI system, the FSPA system demonstrated higher accuracy in evaluating spino-pelvic morphology in HDDS patients. Moreover, it exhibited higher ICC values, indicating higher inter-observer reliability, thus serving as an effective method for assessing spino-pelvic morphology in HDDS patients.

Evaluation of distal tibia slope in pilon fractures after surgical fixation.

INTRODUCTION: Alteration of sagittal alignment during fracture fixation directly impacts ankle motion in dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. Previously research measured the anterior distal tibia angle (ADTA) in a normal healthy population. The null hypothesis for this study is that ADTA is restored to normal range following unstable pilon fractures. The aim of this study is to identify the range of the ADTA in distal tibia fractures after surgical fixation, compared to a previously published normal population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of operative distal tibia fractures (AO/OTA classification 43A and 43C - 43B were excluded due to lower likelihood of fracture changing the ADTA) was performed. ADTA on lateral radiograph was measured as the angle relative to the tibia shaft. RESULTS: 100 patients with post-operative radiographs that met inclusion criteria were analyzed. The average ADTA was 6.9° (⌠=4.62°) with a maximum slope of 19.2° (i.e. anterior orientation) and a minimum of -3.3° (i.e. posterior orientation). The uninjured population had an average ADTA of 6.0° (range -2.0°-14°, ⌠=3.0°). CONCLUSION: This analysis shows the average distal tibia sagittal alignment in the post-surgical group is similar to a normal, uninjured population. Large alterations in ADTA would directly impact the ankle in the plane of motion (i.e. negative ADTA would decrease ankle dorsiflexion). Considering ADTA as an objective intra-operative parameter optimizes sagittal plane alignment.

Restoring L4-S1 Lordosis Shape in Severe Sagittal Deformity: Impact of Correction Techniques on Alignment and Complication Profile.

BACKGROUND: Severe sagittal plane deformity with loss of L4-S1 lordosis is disabling and can be improved through various surgical techniques. However, data are limited on the differing ability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) to achieve alignment goals in severely malaligned patients. METHODS: Severe adult spinal deformity patients with preoperative PI-LL >20°, L4-S1 lordosis <30°, and full body radiographs and PROMs at baseline and 6-week postoperative visit were included. Patients were grouped into ALIF (1-2 level ALIF at L4-S1), PSO (L4/L5 PSO), and TLIF (1-2 level TLIF at L4-S1). Comparative analyses were performed on demographics, radiographic spinopelvic parameters, complications, and PROMs. RESULTS: Among the 96 included patients, 40 underwent ALIF, 27 underwent PSO, and 29 underwent TLIF. At baseline, cohorts had comparable age, sex, race, Edmonton frailty scores, and radiographic spinopelvic parameters (P > 0.05). However, PSO was performed more often in revision cases (P < 0.001). Following surgery, L4-S1 lordosis correction (P = 0.001) was comparable among ALIF and PSO patients and caudal lordotic apex migration (P = 0.044) was highest among ALIF patients. PSO patients had higher intraoperative estimated blood loss (P < 0.001) and motor deficits (P = 0.049), and in-hospital ICU admission (P = 0.022) and blood products given (P = 0.004), but were otherwise comparable in terms of length of stay, blood transfusion given, and postoperative admission to rehab. Likewise, 90-day postoperative complication profiles and 6-week PROMs were comparable as well. CONCLUSIONS: ALIF can restore L4-S1 sagittal alignment as powerfully as PSO, with fewer intraoperative and in-hospital complications. When feasible, ALIF is a suitable alternative to PSO and likely superior to TLIF for correcting L4-S1 lordosis among patients with severe sagittal malalignment.

Spino-pelvic parameters and back pain in patients without coronal deformity or history of spinal surgery: A cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: During the last two decades, there has been a growing interest in spinal sagittal alignment. Most published studies have focused on the role of spinopelvic parameters in patients with adult spinal deformity or in those with previous spinal fusion. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore possible association between disability related to back pain and spinopelvic parameters in the absence of coronal deformity or previous spinal surgery. METHODS: In the setting of a larger study involving patients with low back pain (LBP), those without previous surgery or spinal deformity in the coronal plane were selected. A total of 52 patients (mean age 59 years, range 21-86, 23 men and 29 women) were found. The visual analogic scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire (ODI) were recorded. Surgimap software was used to measure the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and lumbar lordosis (LL). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS Statistics software. Pearson or Spearman correlation were the test of choice depending on the specific variables. RESULTS: A statistically significant association was found between SVA and ODI (r 0.59, p< 0.03). Increased pelvic tilt was also associated with more severe disability related to back pain (r 0.48, p< 0.03). PI-LL mismatch showed moderate association with disability and severity of back pain, although this association did not reach statistical significance (r 0.52, p< 0.08). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that sagittal misalignment may be related with more severe disability and back pain in patients with minor or null deformity in the coronal plane.