Comparative analysis of semaglutide induced adverse reactions: Insights from FAERS database and social media reviews with a focus on oral vs subcutaneous administration.

Background: Compared to alternative weight-loss strategies and medications, semaglutide stands out for its convenience and efficacy, resulting in a significant increase in prescriptions and raising public safety concerns. Furthermore, the safety profiles of its oral and subcutaneous formulations require further examination. Objective: Our goal is to investigate the potential safety risks associated with semaglutide by analyzing data from the FAERS database and social media. Additionally, we aim to compare the adverse drug reaction (ADR) signals between the oral and subcutaneous administration routes of semaglutide. Methods: We collected semaglutide-related reports from the FAERS database spanning Q1 2018 to Q2 2023, and patient reviews on WebMD and AskaPatient up to 20 July 2023. Following data extraction and cleansing, we conducted descriptive analyses of demographic characteristics. Subsequently, we calculated adverse drug reaction (ADR) signals using the reporting odds ratio (ROR). Results: We identified 19,289 and 422 semaglutide-related adverse drug events (ADEs) reported in the FAERS database and online patient reviews, respectively. Gastrointestinal disorders emerged as the most commonly reported System Organ Class (SOC) in both datasets. Predominant Preferred Terms (PTs) included nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Serious outcomes constituted 3.07% and 2.25% of all cases for oral and subcutaneous semaglutide, respectively. At the SOC level, gastrointestinal disorders accounted for 30.19% of total ADEs in oral semaglutide, slightly surpassing the 27.76% in subcutaneous semaglutide. The median onset for gastrointestinal PTs was 4 days in both oral (Q1: 1, Q3: 32) and subcutaneous (Q1: 1, Q3: 35) formulations. Noteworthy, new serious adverse event (AE) signals were identified, including hemorrhagic diarrhea (ROR: 3.69), hepatic pain (ROR: 4.20), abnormal hormone levels (ROR: 6.51), and pancreatic failure (ROR: 36.34) in subcutaneous semaglutide, and Dupuytren's contracture (ROR: 46.85) in oral semaglutide. Conclusion: Our study delineates the safety profile of semaglutide using data from the FAERS database and social media. And identified novel ADR signals specific to oral and subcutaneous forms of semaglutide.

Dosing Patterns of Dulaglutide and Semaglutide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in France and Italy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex metabolic disease with several treatment options. Some glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) approved by the European Medicines Agency include dulaglutide, subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide, and oral semaglutide. This study examines dulaglutide and semaglutide dosing patterns for T2DM in France and Italy. METHODS: IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription Data identified adults with T2DM prescribed dulaglutide or semaglutide between August 1, 2020 and December 31, 2022. Cohort 1 (incident) and cohort 2 (prevalent) users were followed for 12 months. RESULTS: In France and Italy, 255,571 and 350,853 patients, respectively, received at least one study GLP-1 RA. Most dulaglutide-naïve patients in France (62%) and approximately half in Italy (49%) started on 1.5 mg and remained on this dose for up to 12 months (France: 66% cohort 1, 88% cohort 2; Italy: 73% cohort 1, 87% cohort 2). In cohort 1, s.c. semaglutide users mostly started on 0.25 mg (France, 78%; Italy, 61%). At 12 months, s.c. semaglutide 1.0 mg was most prescribed (France: 58% cohort 1, 75% cohort 2; Italy: 59% cohort 2), with cohort 1 in Italy mostly receiving 0.5 mg (57%). Most oral semaglutide users in Italy started on 3.0 mg (78% cohort 1; 68% cohort 2), which was increased to 7.0 mg (62% cohort 1) and 14.0 mg (48% cohort 2) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1 RA dosing patterns, although similar between France and Italy, were heterogeneous over time. As oral semaglutide and higher dulaglutide doses are recent to the market, additional real-world evidence is required to evaluate utilization patterns. Graphical abstract available for this article.

Lower Risk of Postoperative Complications and Rotator Cuff Retear Associated with Semaglutide Use in Patients with Type II Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair.

PURPOSE: To investigate the potential impact of preoperative semaglutide use (active agent in Ozempic® and Wegovy®) on ninety-day postoperative outcomes and two-year rotator cuff retear following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. METHODS: T2DM patients undergoing primary ARCR were identified from the PearlDiver database using administrative billing codes. Exclusion criteria included: patients <18 years old, prior RCR, concurrent non-rotator cuff related arthroscopic shoulder procedures, any traumatic, neoplastic, or infectious diagnoses within 90-days before surgery, and <90-days follow-up. T2DM patients using semaglutide within one-year of ARCR ([+]semaglutide) were matched 1:4 with T2DM patients who did not ([-]semaglutide) by age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), diabetes complications, obesity, tobacco, insulin, and metformin use. Occurrence of any, severe, and minor adverse events (AAE, SAEs, MAEs, respectively) within 90-days were compared by multivariable logistic regression. Two-year retear was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and compared by log-rank test. RESULTS: There were 1,094 ARCR (+)semaglutide and 4,110 ARCR (-)semaglutide patients meeting inclusion criteria after matching. The incidence of AAE for the ARCR (-)semaglutide vs. ARCR (+)semaglutide patients was 27.4% vs. 11.0%, SAE was 10.5% vs. 3.5%, and MAE was 22.0% vs. 8.5%, respectively (p<0.001 for all). ARCR (-)semaglutide patients had a higher odds ratio (OR) of AAE (3.65, p<0.001) and SAEs (3.62, p<0.001), including surgical-site infection (2.22, p=0.049), venous thromboembolism (3.10, p<0.001), sepsis (3.87, p<0.001), and cardiac events (3.96, p<0.001). Also, greater odds of MAEs (3.59, p<0.001), including urinary tract infection (3.27), pneumonia (3.88), acute kidney injury (3.91), and ED visits (2.51) (p<0.001 for all). Additionally, (-)semaglutide patients revealed higher 2-year retear vs (+)semaglutide patients (18.3% vs 12.5%, respectively) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative semaglutide use for T2DM patients undergoing ARCR was associated with decreased odds of minor and serious 90-day adverse events, and lower 2-year rotator cuff retear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Semaglutide utilization associated with reduced ninety-day postoperative complications following single-level posterior lumbar fusion for patients with type II diabetes.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Semaglutide (the active agent in medications such as Ozempic®) has emerged as an increasingly popular medication in the management of diabetes due to its superior clinical efficacy compared with other medications. Patients undergoing surgery, such as posterior lumbar fusion (PLF), may be on these medications for type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM). While the correlation of T2DM with inferior PLF outcomes is known, considering the potential impact of semaglutide on the odds of postoperative complications has not previously been characterized. PURPOSE: To investigate the potential correlation of semaglutide on 90-day postoperative adverse events following single-level PLF for those with T2DM who are or are not concurrently taking insulin. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A retrospective cohort study utilizing the 2010 - Q2 2022 M161Ortho PearlDiver Mariner Patient Claims Database. PATIENT SAMPLE: T2DM patients (with or without concurrent insulin use) undergoing single-level PLF (with or without interbody fusion) were identified using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Exclusion criteria included: patients less than 18 years of age, those undergoing concurrent cervical, thoracic, anterior, or multi-level fusion procedures, and those with trauma, neoplasm, or infection diagnosed within three months of surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of 90-day aggregated any, severe, and minor adverse events (AAE, SAE, and MAE, respectively), emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital readmissions. METHODS: Patients with a prior diagnosis of T2DM not using insulin (T2DM-insulin) and T2DM concurrently using insulin (T2DM+insulin) undergoing PLF were identified. Patients within each group who utilized semaglutide in the year prior to surgery were identified and matched 1:4 with non-semaglutide T2DM-insulin and non-semaglutide T2DM+insulin patients, respectively, based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), obesity, tobacco use, metformin use, and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) use. The incidence of 90-day adverse events between groups was compared by univariate and multivariate analyses. Bonferroni correction was utilized to reduce the risk of type I error. RESULTS: Of all T2DM patients undergoing PLF, semaglutide use was noted for 227 (0.73%) of T2DM-insulin patients, and 244 (2.17%) of T2DM+insulin patients. Once matched, there were 191 and 148 in the semaglutide groups, respectively. For the PLF T2DM-insulin analysis, those using semaglutide were at significantly lower odds of AAE (odds ratio [OR] 0.43), MAE (OR 0.45), and ED visits (OR 0.34) (p<0.001 for all), but not of SAEs or readmissions. For the PLF T2DM+insulin analysis, those using semaglutide were at significantly lower odds of AAE (OR 0.40, p<0.001), SAE (OR 0.43, p=0.004), MAE (OR 0.34, p<0.001), and ED visits (OR 0.26, p<0.001), but not readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: The current study found consistent reductions in aggregated 90-day adverse events, but similar odds of hospital readmission for T2DM patients undergoing PLF taking semaglutide preoperatively. These encouraging findings of reduced postoperative complications suggest further prospective analysis, as the observed findings suggest clinical benefit to semaglutide being utilized by the studied patient population.

Association between Semaglutide and Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy: A Multinational Population-Based Real-World Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether semaglutide increases the risk of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) in the general population. DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study utilized a de-identified global electronic medical records database. The enrollment period was extended from January 2017 to August 2023, with observations concluding in August 2024. PARTICIPANTS: This study included individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or obesity. They were further categorized into T2DM-only, obesity-only, and T2DM with obesity groups to assess the differences among these subgroups. The effects of semaglutide were compared with those of glucose-lowering or weight loss medications other than glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists. METHODS: Patient data were obtained from 160 healthcare organizations across 21 countries. Outcomes were evaluated at one, two, and three years of follow-up. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed to balance age, sex, body mass index, hemoglobin A1C, medications, and underlying comorbidities. Cox regression models were used to compute hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The occurrence of NAION. RESULTS: The final analysis included 37,245 participants with T2DM-only, 33,537 participants with obesity-only, and 64,989 participants with both T2DM and obesity. The results indicated that the administration of semaglutide was not associated with the development of NAION in the T2DM-only group (1 year follow-up: HR, 2.32; 95% CI, 0.60-8.97; 2 years: HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 0.86-6.17; 3 years: HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.71-3.25), the obesity-only group (1 year follow-up: HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.03-2.28; 2 years: HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.09-2.21; 3 years: HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.09-2.21), and the T2DM with obesity group (1 year follow-up: HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.42-1.57; 2 years: HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.74-1.94; 3 years: HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.78-1.82). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that semaglutide may not be associated with an increased risk of NAION in the general population. Therefore, avoidance of semaglutide based solely on concerns regarding the risk of NAION may not be warranted, as its potential benefits for blood glucose control and cardiovascular health likely outweigh its potential risks.

REAL life study of subcutaneous SEMaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes in SPain: Ambispective, multicenter clinical study. Results in the GLP1-experienced cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of switching to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were previously treated with other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in a real-world setting in Spain. METHODS: The REAL Life study of SEMaglutide in Patients with Type 2 diabetes in Spain (REALSEM-SP) was conducted in four endocrinology departments in Madrid, Spain. Adult patients with T2DM who were prescribed once-weekly (OW) subcutaneous semaglutide and had been previously treated with other GLP-1 RAs were included. Baseline characteristics, including demographic, anthropometric, and laboratory variables, were recorded at baseline and at 6 ± 3 and 12 ± 3 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c at 12 ± 3 months of follow-up, with secondary outcomes including changes in weight, BMI, and other glycemic parameters. RESULTS: A total of 267 patients were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 61.6 years and a mean T2DM duration of 11.3 years. The majority of patients had grade 1 or 2 obesity at baseline. Switching to OW-semaglutide was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c from baseline to 13 months (-0.35 % ± 0.81). Patients who reached the 1.0 mg OW-dose showed a significant reduction in HbA1c compared to those on the ≤0.5 mg OW-dose. Significant reductions in weight, BMI, and fasting plasma glucose were also observed. Adverse events were mostly gastrointestinal and led to treatment withdrawal in few cases. CONCLUSION: Switching to OW-subcutaneous semaglutide in patients with T2DM previously treated with other GLP-1 RAs was associated to improvements in glycemic control and weight management in a real-world setting in Spain. These findings support the use of OW-semaglutide as an effective option for patients with T2DM who require additional glycemic control and weight management.

Associations of semaglutide with first-time diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: Target trial emulation using nationwide real-world data in the US.

INTRODUCTION: Emerging preclinical evidence suggests that semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity, protects against neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. However, real-world evidence for its ability to protect against Alzheimer's disease (AD) is lacking. METHODS: We conducted emulation target trials based on a nationwide database of electronic health records (EHRs) of 116 million US patients. Seven target trials were emulated among 1,094,761 eligible patients with T2DM who had no prior AD diagnosis by comparing semaglutide with seven other antidiabetic medications. First-ever diagnosis of AD occurred within a 3-year follow-up period and was examined using Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. RESULTS: Semaglutide was associated with significantly reduced risk for first-time AD diagnosis, most strongly compared with insulin (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33 [95% CI: 0.21 to 0.51]) and most weakly compared with other GLP-1RAs (HR, 0.59 [95% CI: 0.37 to 0.95]). Similar results were seen across obesity status, gender, and age groups. DISCUSSION: These findings support further studies to assess semaglutide's potential in preventing AD. HIGHLIGHTS: Semaglutide was associated with 40% to 70% reduced risks of first-time AD diagnosis in T2DM patients compared to other antidiabetic medications, including other GLP-1RAs. Semaglutide was associated with significantly lower AD-related medication prescriptions. Similar reductions were seen across obesity status, gender, and age groups. Our findings provide real-world evidence supporting the potential clinical benefits of semaglutide in mitigating AD initiation and development in patients with T2DM. These findings support further clinical trials to assess semaglutide's potential in delaying or preventing AD.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and suicidality: A replication study using reports to the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®).

INTRODUCTION: Reports of suicidality associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been reported to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We previously reported an increased reporting odds ratio (ROR) of some measures of suicidality with semaglutide and liraglutide using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Notwithstanding the increased ROR, causality between GLP-1 RAs exposure and any aspect of suicidality is not established. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The analysis herein aims to extend a previous analysis of the FAERS by evaluating the ROR for suicidality reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) Pharmacovigilance Database (VigiBase). We aimed to characterize the ROR of suicidality associated with GLP-1 RAs, as extrapolated from spontaneous reports. As per our previous report, the ROR was considered significant when the lower limit of the 95 % confidence (CI) was >1.0. RESULTS: We searched VigiBase reports from inception to January 2024. The RORs for suicidal ideation were significantly increased for semaglutide (5.82), liraglutide (4.03) and tirzepatide (2.25). For "depression/suicidal", the ROR was significantly increased for semaglutide (14.74) and liraglutide (5.86); and for suicidal behaviour, the ROR was significantly increased for semaglutide (6.52) and liraglutide (3.90). However, for suicide attempts, the ROR was significantly decreased for semaglutide (0.11), dulaglutide (0.075), exenatide (0.047) and liraglutide (0.15). For completed suicide, the ROR was also significantly decreased for semaglutide (0.01), dulaglutide (0.003), exenatide (0.002) and liraglutide (0.008). CONCLUSION: Unlike our previous report with FAERS, a mixed pattern of ROR emerged in the WHO VigiBase with respect to suicidality and exposure to select GLP-RAs. Causation between GLP-1 RA exposure and suicidality (either increased or decreased) cannot be ascertained from ROR data.

The association between glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and/or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist prescriptions and substance-related outcomes in patients with opioid and alcohol use disorders: A real-world data analysis.

AIMS: This study aimed to estimate the strength of association between prescriptions of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and/or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and the incidence of opioid overdose and alcohol intoxication in patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD), respectively. This study also aimed to compare the strength of the GIP/GLP-1 RA and substance use-outcome association among patients with comorbid type 2 diabetes and obesity. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study analyzing de-identified electronic health record data from the Oracle Cerner Real-World Data. SETTING: About 136 United States of America health systems, covering over 100 million patients, spanning January 2014 to September 2022. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 503 747 patients with a history of OUD and 817 309 patients with a history of AUD, aged 18 years or older. MEASUREMENTS: The exposure indicated the presence (one or more) or absence of GIP/GLP-1 RA prescriptions. The outcomes were the incidence rates of opioid overdose in the OUD cohort and alcohol intoxication in the AUD cohort. Potential confounders included comorbidities and demographic factors. FINDINGS: Patients with GIP/GLP-1 RA prescriptions demonstrated statistically significantly lower rates of opioid overdose [adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) in OUD patients: 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.43-0.83] and alcohol intoxication (aIRR in AUD patients: 0.50; 95% CI = 0.40-0.63) compared to those without such prescriptions. When stratified by comorbid conditions, the rate of incident opioid overdose and alcohol intoxication remained similarly protective for those prescribed GIP/GLP-1 RA among patients with OUD and AUD. CONCLUSIONS: Prescriptions of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and/or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists appear to be associated with lower rates of opioid overdose and alcohol intoxication in patients with opioid use disorder and alcohol use disorder. The protective effects are consistent across various subgroups, including patients with comorbid type 2 diabetes and obesity.

Design of self-emulsifying oral delivery systems for semaglutide: reverse micelles versus hydrophobic ion pairs.

It was the aim of this study to evaluate the potential of reverse micelles (RM) and hydrophobic ion pairs (HIP) for incorporation of semaglutide into self-emulsifying oral drug delivery systems. Reverse micelles loaded with semaglutide were formed with a cationic (ethyl lauroyl arginate, ELA) and an anionic surfactant (docusate, DOC), whereas HIP were formed between semaglutide and ELA. Maximum solubility of the peptide and the rate of dissolution was evaluated in various lipophilic phases (glycerol monocaprylocaprate:caprylic acid 1:4 (m/m), glycerol monolinoleate:caprylic acid 1:4 (m/m) and glycerol monocaprylocaprate:glycerol monolinoleate 1:4 (m/m)). Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) loaded with RM and HIP were characterized regarding size distribution, zeta potential, cytocompatibility and Caco-2 permeability. Droplet sizes between 50 and 300 nm with polydispersity index (PDI) around 0.3 and zeta potentials between - 45 mV (RMDOC) and 36 mV (RMELA) were obtained. RM provided an almost 2-fold higher lipophilicity of semaglutide than HIP resulting in a 4.2-fold higher payload of SEDDS compared to HIP. SEDDS containing RM or HIP showed high cytocompatibilities with a cell survival above 75% for concentrations up to 0.1% on Caco-2 cells and acceptable hemolytic activity. Permeation studies across Caco-2 monolayer revealed an at least 2-fold increase in permeability of semaglutide for the developed formulations.

Semaglutide and smoking cessation in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: there is no smoke without fire!

Tobacco use represents the leading preventable risk factor for premature deaths worldwide. A meta-analysis of 74 epidemiological studies, including 3.2 million individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from 33 countries, reported a pooled prevalence of smoking of 20.8% among individuals with T2DM. Cigarette smoking further aggravates existing deleterious vascular effects of T2DM. Namely, chronic hyperglycemia and exposure to cigarette smoke cause additive injurious effect on the endothelium, leading to an acceleration of vascular complications seen in persons with T2DM and tobacco use disorders (TUD). In a recent study, Wang and colleagues found that semaglutide use was associated with a significantly lower risk for medical encounters for TUD, when compared to other antidiabetic drug classes; indeed, this effect was strongest compared with insulins and weakest compared with other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Semaglutide was associated with reduced smoking cessation medication prescriptions and counseling. Similar findings were observed irrespective of the presence of obesity. Therefore, semaglutide use might be useful in terms of smoking cessation among individuals with T2DM, thus offering an additional benefit for this constantly growing population. However, those interesting findings should be confirmed through dedicated, large-scale randomized controlled trials.

Semaglutide exposure and its association with adverse outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease.

OBJECTIVE: Semaglutide, a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has transformed the therapeutic landscape for type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, its effect on osteoclast activity and its potential to induce weight-related muscle loss raises concerns about its impact on spine surgery outcomes. As such, evaluating semaglutide's influence on transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is imperative, given the procedure's reliance on successful bony fusion to prevent postoperative instability and further interventions. METHODS: Using an all-payer database (MARINER), the authors analyzed data from patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were 18-74 years of age and who underwent short-segment fusion (≤ 3-level) TLIFs between January 2018 and October 2022. Patients were either exposed to semaglutide or not. A comprehensive 1:3 (exposure vs no exposure) matching was performed based on age, sex, obesity, hypertension, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, smoking status, osteoporosis, levels of surgery, and basal-bolus insulin dependence. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank testing were performed to study the probability of additional lumbar fusion surgery within 1 year. RESULTS: After the 1:3 matching, 1781 patients were identified, with 447 in the semaglutide-exposed cohort and 1334 in the nonexposed cohort. Most patients in both groups were 55-69 years old, and 59.3% were female. Analysis showed that the likelihood of undergoing additional lumbar fusion surgery within 1 year post-TLIF was significantly higher in the semaglutide-exposed group than in the nonexposed group (OR 11.79, 95% CI 8.17-17.33). Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank testing further confirmed a statistically significant divergent probability in the need for additional surgery within 1 year between the cohorts (log-rank, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Semaglutide exposure appears to be associated with a higher likelihood of additional lumbar fusion surgeries within 1 year post-TLIF, especially in patients receiving the medication for longer durations. Although the mechanisms remain speculative, potential impacts on bone turnover and the onset of muscle loss may be contributory factors. Further research is needed to elucidate the exact mechanisms and to develop strategies for optimizing surgical outcomes in these patients.

RGB Trichromatic Whiteness Assessment of Bio Analytical Chromatographic Tool Using Fluorescence for Quantitation of Semaglutide: Application to Pharmaceutical Preparations and Spiked Plasma.

Semaglutide (SEMG) is one of the most widely used and trending medications to treat type II diabetes and obesity. This work aimed to develop a liquid chromatography with spectroflourimetric detection (HPLC-flourimetry) analysis of SEMG in both its tablet dosage form and plasma. The power of fluorescence detection coupled with HPLC proved its capability as a bioanalytical tool to assay SEMG in plasma samples owing to its simplicity and sensitivity which reached below the Cmax of SEMG. Separation was done using a C18 column with mobile phase of acetonitrile and water acidified with orthophosphoric acid (pH 3.5) (1.41 × 10-5 M) in isocratic mode in ratio 57:43 and 1 mL/min flow rate after extraction using protein precipitation. Detection was carried out at λ excitation of 238 nm and λ emission of 416 and 307 nm for SEMG and the internal standard, respectively. Evaluation of greenness of the proposed method was done using AGREE (Analytical GREEnness Metric Approach), ComplexGAPI (Complementary Green Analytical Procedure Index) & the new algorithm RGB 12 model (Red-Green-Blue). They showed that these methods can be a greener alternative with acceptable sensitivity for analysis of SEMG. The developed seven min-assay was validated per ICH as well as FDA bio analytical methods' guidelines to prove its applicability for routine sample analysis and future pharmacokinetic studies.

Semaglutide Treatment Effects on Liver Fat Content in Obese Subjects with Metabolic-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD).

Background: Metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) represents a major clinical complication of obesity. Methods: In this study, we used magnetic resonance (MR) methods to determine the effect of obesity treatment with semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, on the liver fat content and selected metabolic variables. We investigated whether treatment would affect the acute response of liver fat to glucose and fructose administration and whether it would affect the fatty acid profile of VLDL-triglycerides. Sixteen obese non-diabetic men underwent a 16-week dietary intervention and 16-week treatment with subcutaneous semaglutide in a crossover design without a washout period. The order of the interventions was randomized. Results: After treatment, body weight of the subjects decreased by 5% and liver fat by a third, whereas dietary intervention had no impact on these parameters. The decrease in liver fat with semaglutide did not correlate with changes in body weight and other measures of adiposity and was unrelated to improved insulin sensitivity. Conclusions: The proportion of palmitic and palmitoleic acids in VLDL-triglycerides decreased after treatment, suggesting that the beneficial effects of semaglutide on liver fat are mediated by the suppression of de novo lipogenesis.

Semaglutide 2.4 mg in Participants With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis: Baseline Characteristics and Design of the Phase 3 ESSENCE Trial.

BACKGROUND: Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has demonstrated potential beneficial effects in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). AIMS: To describe the trial design and baseline characteristics of the 'Effect of Semaglutide in Subjects with Non-cirrhotic Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis' (ESSENCE) trial (NCT04822181). METHODS: ESSENCE is a two-part, phase 3, randomised, multicentre trial evaluating the effect of subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg in participants with biopsy-proven MASH and fibrosis stage 2 or 3. The primary objective of Part 1 is to demonstrate that semaglutide improves liver histology compared with placebo. The two primary endpoints are: resolution of steatohepatitis and no worsening of liver fibrosis, and improvement in liver fibrosis and no worsening of steatohepatitis. The Part 2 objective is based on clinical outcomes. The current work reports baseline characteristics of the first 800 randomised participants which includes demographics, laboratory parameters, liver histology, non-invasive tests and presence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) cardiometabolic criteria. RESULTS: Of 800 participants, 250 (31.3%) had fibrosis stage 2 and 550 (68.8%) had fibrosis stage 3. In the overall population, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 56 (11.6) years, 57.1% were female, mean (SD) body mass index was 34.6 (7.2) kg/m2, 55.5% had type 2 diabetes and > 99% had at least one MASLD cardiometabolic criterion according to the published definition. CONCLUSION: The ESSENCE baseline population includes participants with clinically significant fibrosis stages 2 and 3. Although MASLD cardiometabolic criteria were not a requirement for study enrolment, almost all participants (> 99%) had at least one MASLD cardiometabolic criterion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04822181.

Bioengineered Nanomedicines Targeting the Intestinal Fc Receptor Achieve the Improved Glucoregulatory Effect of Semaglutide in a Type 2 Diabetic Mice Model.

The oral administration of the glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, semaglutide, remains a hurdle due to its limited bioavailability. Herein, neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-targeted nanoparticles (NPs) were designed to enhance the oral delivery of semaglutide. The nanocarriers were covalently linked to the FcRn-binding peptide FcBP or the affibody molecule ZFcRn that specifically binds to the human FcRn (hFcRn) in a pH-dependent manner. These FcRn-targeted ligands were selected over the endogenous ligands of the receptor (albumin and IgG) due to their smaller size and simpler structure, which could facilitate the transport of functionalized NPs through the tissues. The capacity of FcRn-targeted semaglutide-NPs in controlling the blood glucose levels was evaluated in an hFcRn transgenic mice model, where type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was induced via intraperitoneal injection of nicotinamide followed by streptozotocin. The encapsulation of semaglutide into FcRn-targeted NPs was translated in an improved glucoregulatory effect in T2DM-induced mice when compared to the oral free semaglutide or nontargeted NP groups, after daily oral administrations for 7 days. Notably, a similar glucose-lowering response was observed between both FcRn-targeted NPs and the subcutaneous semaglutide groups. An increase in insulin pancreatic content and a recovery in ß cell mass were visualized in the mice treated with FcRn-targeted semaglutide-NPs. The biodistribution of fluorescently labeled NPs through the gastrointestinal tract demonstrated that the nanosystems targeting the hFcRn are retained longer in the ileum and colorectum, where the expression of FcRn is more prevalent, than nontargeted NPs. Therefore, FcRn-targeted nanocarriers proved to be an effective platform for improving the pharmacological effect of semaglutide in a T2DM-induced mice model.

[New outcome studies with injectable semaglutide in different at risk populations]. / L'étude clinique du mois. Nouvelles études cliniques avec le sémaglutide injectable dans différentes populations à risque.

Injectable semaglutide at a dose of 1 mg once weekly has been shown to be the most efficacious glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist when considering both the improvement in blood glucose control and the reduction in body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). After the SUSTAIN-6 study, published in 2016, which demonstrated not only the good safety but also already the cardiovascular (CV) efficacy of semaglutide in patients with T2D and high CV risk, several large placebo-controlled randomised trials have confirmed improved prognosis with semaglutide in different at risk populations : patients with T2D and chronic kidney disease (FLOW trial), subjects with obesity and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, with or without T2D (STEP-HFpEF trial) and people with overweight or obesity (but without T2D) and a confirmed atheromatous cardiovascular disease (SELECT trial). Studies performed in patients with obesity used a higher dose of 2.4 mg/week. These positive results, based upon major clinically relevant outcomes, extend the therapeutic possibilities with semaglutide among at high risk patients of cardiovascular and/or renal diseases.

Le sémaglutide injectable à la dose de 1 mg/semaine s'est révélé être l'agoniste des récepteurs de glucagon-like peptide-1 (ARGLP-1) le plus efficace en termes de contrôle glycémique et de perte de poids chez des patients avec un diabète de type 2 (DT2). Après l'étude SUSTAIN-6, publiée en 2016, ayant démontré la bonne sécurité et déjà l'efficacité cardiovasculaire (CV) du sémaglutide chez des patients avec DT2 à haut risque CV, plusieurs grands essais contrôlés ont prouvé une amélioration du pronostic dans différentes populations à risque : patients avec DT2 et maladie rénale chronique (étude FLOW), sujets avec obèsité et avec une insuffisance cardiaque à fraction d'éjection préservée (avec ou sans DT2) (étude STEP-HFpEF) et personnes avec un surpoids ou une obésité (mais sans DT2) et une maladie CV avérée (étude SELECT). Les études dans l'obésité ont été menées avec une posologie de 2,4 mg/semaine de sémaglutide. Ces résultats positifs, basés sur des critères de jugement cliniques majeurs, étendent donc les possibilités thérapeutiques offertes par le sémaglutide chez des patients à haut risque de maladies CV et/ou rénales.

Tackling Cravings in Medical Weight Management: An Update on Pathophysiology and an Integrated Approach to Treatment.

Background/Objectives: Food cravings involve a strong drive to consume palatable foods irrespective of nutritional status. Importantly, cravings contribute substantially to the obesity epidemic. Managing hunger alone is insufficient for weight management as this relates only to homeostatic eating and does not address the complex aetiology of hedonic eating and its crucial role in food cravings. Medical weight management clinics and anti-obesity medication trials do not routinely identify and address food cravings. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature consisting of 115 peer-reviewed articles (original articles and reviews). We included articles focused on food craving pathophysiology, assessment, and management strategies providing contrasts against the current medical model of weight management seen in obesity pharmacotherapy trials as well as the current standard of practise. Results: We outline the neurohormonal and psychological drivers of cravings, which lead to a spectrum of eating behaviours, from comfort food eating to binge eating disorders. We provide an overview of ways of identification and measurement options, including their strengths and weaknesses, and an overview of management strategies and their cravings control efficacy, spanning lifestyle modifications like nutrition and sleep, psychological therapies (i.e., cognitive behavioural therapy [CBT], acceptance-based therapies such as mindfulness) and, last but not least, medications that not only are approved for weight reduction but reduce cravings. Finally, based on these findings, we provide a proposed integrated and iterative model that is able to evolve and adapt to the individual over time in tackling cravings for long-term weight loss maintenance. Conclusions: The findings emphasise the importance of cravings management and provide a synthesis on how cravings can be identified in a medical weight management setting, which can be practically implemented in an integrated iterative model spanning anti-obesity medications that have craving control data to evidence-based lifestyle and psychological interventions.

Impact of semaglutide on weight and functional outcomes among obese heart failure patients: a propensity scores matching analysis.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Obesity is a common comorbidity in heart failure, yet effective pharmacological options for weight loss in these patients are limited. Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, has shown promise for weight reduction in obese adults. This study aims to evaluate semaglutide's impact on weight loss, functional status, and clinical outcomes in obese patients with heart failure. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all consecutive obese (BMI > 30 kg/m²) patients with heart failure at the University Hospital Bonn outpatient clinic from July 2019 to July 2022. Propensity score matching paired patients receiving semaglutide as an add-on therapy (SEMA) with those on medical therapy alone (Control). RESULTS: Among 1,942 patients with heart failure screened, 26 matched pairs were identified. At one year, the SEMA group exhibited significant weight loss, with a mean BMI reduction of -2.91 kg/m² (95% CI: -4.27 to -1.55; p < 0.001), while the control group showed a non-significant mean change of -0.41 kg/m² (95% CI: -1.08 to 0.26; p = 0.22). The difference in BMI between the two groups was statistically significant (mean difference: 3.42 kg/m², 95% CI: 1.43 to 5.42; p = 0.001). Improvements by at least one NYHA class were observed in 65% of the SEMA group (p < 0.001) compared to 15% of the control group (p = 0.18). The SEMA group also showed a significant increase in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), with a mean difference of 75 m between the groups at one year (95% CI: 0.53 to 150.02; p = 0.049). NT-proBNP levels significantly decreased in the SEMA group (p < 0.001) compared to the control group (p = 0.78), with a statistically significant difference in NT-proBNP between the groups (p = 0.048). Both improvements in 6MWD and reductions in NT-proBNP were significantly correlated with BMI percentage reductions. CONCLUSIONS: Semaglutide was associated with significant weight reduction in obese patients with heart failure, accompanied by improved NYHA classification and 6-minute walk distance. Larger, multi-center trials and prospective, randomized controlled trials are warranted. These studies should focus on assessing long-term outcomes, optimizing dosage, and exploring the potential cardiovascular benefits beyond weight reduction.