RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy reduces morbidity in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer who achieve axillary pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant therapy (NACT). De-escalation trials primarily addressed cN1 disease, with underrepresentation of cN2 disease. This study evaluates the role of de-escalation in patients with cN2 breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (2013-2020) included women over 18 with T1-2 invasive breast cancer and clinical N2 disease who received NACT followed by ALND or SLNB then ALND. The primary outcome was pathologic nodal status post-NACT. RESULTS: Of 5852 cN2 patients treated, 18.15 â% achieved ypN0, 0.97 â% had isolated tumor cells, 19.14 â% were ypN1, 49.64 â% were ypN2, and 12.20 â% were ypN3 following NACT. Achieving ypN0 was associated with pCR in the breast, HER2-positive and triple-negative receptor status, cT2 tumors, and younger age. CONCLUSION: Despite some patients with cN2 disease achieving ypN0, most exhibited residual axillary disease post-NACT. These findings indicate that axillary de-escalation may not be feasible for most patients with cN2 disease, underscoring the importance of meticulous patient selection and assessment.
RESUMO
The objective of this review was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of ICG (indocyanine green) for sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in head and neck melanoma. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards (PRISMA) were followed when conducting this review with a comprehensive search of the following online databases; Google Scholar, PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry (http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/), ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinical-trials.gov/), and the ISRCTN registry (http://www.isrctn.com/). Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and results were reported with forest plots at 95% confidence intervals. Primary outcomes of interest included the localisation rate for sentinel node biopsies in head and neck melanoma using ICG and compared with other adjunct modalities. Secondary outcome measures included false negative rates as well as sensitivity rates for nodal detection with radiocolloid as well as blue dye. ICG reported an overall sensitivity rate of 95% with an untransformed proportion metric analysis (0.950, 0.922, 0.978 (95% CI)). It demonstrated a superior detection rate to blue dye (Odds ratio 15.417, 95% CI, 4.652 to 51.091, p < 0.001) and a comparable localisation efficacy to radiocolloid (Odds ratio 1.425, 95% CI, 0.535 to 3.794, p = 0.478). The sensitivity rate for radiocolloid utilisation in isolation was 90.6% (untransformed proportion metric, 0.906, 0.855, 0.957) and blue dye was 48.7% (untransformed proportion metric, 0.487, 0.364, 0.610). This is the first meta-analysis on the efficacy of ICG for sentinel node detection in head and neck melanoma. The authors advocate for a dual modality approach with ICG and radiocolloid to mitigate the inherent limitations of both methods when conducting sentinel node retrieval for head and neck melanoma. Further high-quality randomised trials are needed to improve the current evidence base.
Assuntos
Corantes , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Verde de Indocianina , Melanoma , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Fluoroscopia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem , Melanoma/patologia , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Palpable nodes were exclusionary in American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011, while SINODAR-ONE excluded those with positive axillary nodes by palpation and ultrasound. To determine whether clinical nodal status should be exclusionary in those fulfilling pathologic criteria for ACOSOG Z0011 and similar trials, this study analyzed the accuracy and implications of clinical nodal positivity. METHODS: Patients ≥ 18 years old with cT1-T2, cN0-cN1, M0 breast cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2019. Subset characteristics of cN1 and cN0 were compared with respect to final pathologic nodal status and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 57,823 patients identified, 77.0% were cT1 and 23.0% were cT2. Of the 93.9% of patients who were staged as cN0, 16.7% were pN1; of the remaining 6.1% staged as cN1, 9.6% were found to be pN0. Among cN1/pN0 patients, 14.9% underwent axillary dissection without sentinel node biopsy. There was no difference in adjusted OS for patients staged as cN0 versus cN1 who were found to be pN1 (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.93-1.37, p = 0.22), a finding that persisted on subset analysis in those with two positive nodes (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.62-1.33, p = 0.63). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical nodal stage does not affect OS in pN1 patients. Clinical nodal assessment can both overstage patients and result in unnecessary axillary surgery. These data suggest that cN1 patients who are otherwise candidates for a Z0011-like paradigm should still be considered eligible. Their final candidacy should be determined by surgical lymph node pathology and not preoperative clinical status.
RESUMO
Background: The sentinel lymph node is the first node that cancer cells reach when migrating from the primary site. However, oncological outcomes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) have not been reported for cervical cancer. In this study, oncological outcomes were compared between patients receiving SNB and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLD) for early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: One hundred and four patients with clinical stage 1A2, 1B1, and 2A1 cervical cancer were included in this study. All patients underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical hysterectomy with SNB or PLD. Fifty-two patients with tumors ≤2 cm underwent SNB. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the groups. Results: The median (interquartile range) tumor size was 12 (7-20) mm in the SNB group and 20 (13-25) mm in the PLD group. Lymph node metastasis occurred in one patient in the SNB group and in nine patients in the PLD group. The median follow-up periods were 42 (24-60) and 82 (19-101) months in the SNB group and PLD group, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates were 100% in SNB and 91.5% in PLD. The 3-year OS was 100% in both groups. Conclusions: SNB was sufficient in cervical cancer patients with tumors ≤2 cm, suggesting that PLD might not be necessary for these patients.
RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The management of cutaneous melanoma has rapidly progressed over the past decade following the introduction of effective systemic therapies. Given the large number of recent clinical trials which have dramatically altered the management of these patients, an updated review of the current evidence regarding the management of localized melanoma is needed. RECENT FINDINGS: The role of effective systemic therapies in earlier stages (I-III) melanoma, both in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings is rapidly changing the role of surgery in the management cutaneous melanoma, particularly regarding surgical safety margins for wide local excision (WLE), the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and the extent of lymph node dissections. The randomized phase 2 SWOG1801 trial has demonstrated superiority of neoadjuvant-adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy in improving event-free survival by 23% at 2-years over adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy only. Furthermore, the PRADO trial has suggested a more tailored approach both the extent of surgery as well as adjuvant therapy can safely and effectively be done, depending on the response to initial neoadjuvant immunotherapy. These results await validation and it is expected that in 2024 the phase 3 Nadina trial (NCT04949113) will definitively establish neo-adjuvant combination immunotherapy as the novel standard. This will further redefine the management of localized melanoma. The use of effective systemic therapies will continue to evolve in the next decade and, together with new emerging diagnostic and surveillance techniques, will likely reduce the extent of routine surgery for stage I-III melanoma.
Assuntos
Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico , Melanoma , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1 , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Melanoma/terapia , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Receptor de Morte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inibidores , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêutico , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Imunoterapia/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety of sentinel node mapping for patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing cervical conization plus nodal evaluation. METHODS: The ETERNITY project is a retrospective, multi-institutional study collecting data of patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing fertility-sparing treatment. Here, we compared outcomes related to three methods of nodal assessment: sentinel node mapping (SNM), SNM plus backup lymphadenectomy (SNM + LND); pelvic lymphadenectomy (LND). RESULTS: Charts of 123 patients (with stage IA1-IB1 cervical cancer) were evaluated. Median patients' age was 34 (range, 22-44) years. SNM, SNM + LND, and LND were performed in 32 (26 %), 31 (25.2 %), and 60 (48.8 %) patients, respectively. Overall, eight (6.5 %) patients were diagnosed with positive nodes. Two (3.3 %), three (9.7 %), and three (9.4 %) patients were detected in patients who had LND, SNM + LND, and SNM respectively. Considering the 63 patients undergoing SNM (31 SNM + LND and 32 SNM alone), macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells were detected in four (3.2 %), three (2.4 %), and one (0.8 %) patients, respectively. All patients with positive nodes discontinued the fertility sparing treatment. Other two patients (one (1.7 %) in the LND group and one (3.1 %) in the SNM group) required hysterectomy even after negative nodal evaluation. After a median follow-up of 53.6 (range, 1.3, 158.0) months, nine (7.3 %) and two (1.6 %) patients developed cervical and pelvic nodes recurrences, respectively. Disease-free (p = 0.332, log-rank test) and overall survival (p = 0.769, log-rank test) were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective experience, SNM upholds long-term oncologic effectiveness of LND, reducing morbidity.
RESUMO
Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is a rare skin cancer of apocrine-rich skin that mimics common inflammatory and infectious dermatoses, leading to delays in diagnosis and increased patient morbidity. Better clinical recognition of this entity, multidisciplinary patient assessment, and deeper understanding of the underlying pathophysiology are essential to improve patient care and disease outcomes. It is important to distinguish primary intraepithelial/micro-invasive EMPD from invasive EMPD or cases with adenocarcinoma arising within EMPD. This 2-part continuing medical education series provides a complete picture of EMPD. Part 1 of this continuing medical education series reviews the epidemiology, oncogenesis, clinical and histopathologic presentation, workup, and prognosis of this rare cancer.
Assuntos
Doença de Paget Extramamária , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Doença de Paget Extramamária/epidemiologia , Doença de Paget Extramamária/diagnóstico , Doença de Paget Extramamária/patologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Prognóstico , Masculino , Feminino , Diagnóstico DiferencialRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The lymph node staging is the major prognostic factor in breast cancer patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) allows an exactly axillar staging in patients with early disease, but not in locally advance breast cancer (LABC). Our aim was to study, the feasibility and accuracy of the SLNB technique with and without axillar lymphadenectomy (LDN) and with lymph node clipping after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), in patients with LABC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with LABC, scheduled for NAC and subsequent surgery and SLNB. Subsequently the patients were scheduled for adjuvant chemotherapy/hormonotherapy and radiotherapy according with the postsurgical results. Main end points were overall survival (OS) disease-free survival (DFS), mortality, SLNB identification rate (IR), sensitivity, false negative rate (FNR) of SLNB versus LDN, negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy. RESULTS: Our IR with different techniques was between 89.9 and 100%. OS was between 89 and 97%. DFS was between 89.8 and 96.8%. Sensitivity was between 75 and 100%. NPV was between 89.6 and 100%. FNR was between 0 and 25%; and accuracy was between 66 and 72%. We found that survival was lower (p < 0.05) in patients with triple negative and Luminal B/HER2 intrinsic subtype; with progression or major partial response in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) results at the end of NAC and in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation. CONCLUSIONS: Our study presents excellent results of SLNB alone in patients with LABC with complete nodal response with an OS and DFS > 95%. The FNR is very high in partial responders, so we cannot recommend the SLNB alone in LABC. We recommend, in cN+ patients, axillar clipping, SLNB and LDN because in more than 50% of the patients with axillar clipping, this was not found, and because in 36% of the patients with negative LDN, the SLN (Sentinel Lymph Node) obtained was the only positive node, so these techniques together decrease the FNR and improve the node staging, OS and DFS. This study is the first prospective study that assess OS and DFS in patients with LABC, all submitted to SLNB.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Our study aimed to assess the oncological outcomes of sentinel node dissection during radical prostatectomy according to nodal location in comparison to extended pelvic lymph node dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospectively collected data of clinically node-negative patients who underwent prostatectomy and extended lymph node dissection with or without sentinel node from January 2013 to January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end point was to assess oncological outcomes on the whole population. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to depict biochemical and clinical recurrence-free survival. Multivariable Cox regression models assessed the impact of nodal location on single-photon emission computed tomography on oncological outcomes. Adjustment for case mix included: pathological T stage, ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade group, initial PSA, nodal burden, age at surgery, and surgical margin status. Secondarily, a propensity score match was performed according to age at surgery, PSA, biopsy ISUP, clinical T stage, and Briganti risk of nodal invasion. Survival and regression analyses were also performed in the matched population. RESULTS: Of the patients, 55.8% had at least 1 sentinel node outside of lymph node dissection template at single-photon emission computed tomography/CT. Log-rank test showed comparable 36-month biochemical (P = .3) and clinical recurrence-free survival (P = .6) among patients with sentinel node inside template, outside template, or extended pelvic lymph node dissection alone. At Cox regression, sentinel node location outside template was associated with lower hazard of metastases (HR 0.62; P = .04) in the overall cohort, while in the matched cohort benefits were observed only for biochemical recurrence (HR 0.57; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Wider nodal resection boundaries outside the "classic" template, driven by sentinel node procedure, have a positive impact on oncological outcomes in selected patient.
Assuntos
Excisão de Linfonodo , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Linfonodo Sentinela/cirurgia , Linfonodo Sentinela/diagnóstico por imagem , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Metástase Linfática , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: After neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), the SLN identification rate is lower and has a higher false-negative rate than that at upfront surgery. This clinical trial aimed to confirm the effectiveness of sentinel lymph node (SLN) surgery by determining the lymph node identification rate using multimodal SLN marker methods in patients with advanced breast cancer undergoing NAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This clinical study is a prospective single-center randomized controlled trial involving patients with breast cancer receiving NAC. Patients are randomized (1:1:1) into arm A that involves the use of radioisotope (RI) plus indocyanine green fluorescence (ICG-F); arm B, RI plus vital dye; and, arm C, ICG-F plus vital dye. A total of 348 patients are needed. An interim analysis was performed on 50% of the patients enrolled. The primary outcome of this trial was the SLN identification rate. RESULTS: Among the 164 total patients (median age 51 years), T2 and N1 were the most common clinical stages. The identification rate of SLN was 95% in arm A, 92% in arm B, and 79% in arm C. To assess superior efficacy, the one-sided endpoint was set at α < 0.0056. Arms A and C showed a difference of 0.1597 in the detection rate (p = 0.0055). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ICG-F plus vital dye for SLNB was the least effective. The results show that the choice of tracer should be radioisotope in combination with one of the other tracers to have the highest SLN identification rate when SLNB cannot be implemented conventionally due to the circumstances of each institution.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Verde de Indocianina , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Linfonodo Sentinela , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Linfonodo Sentinela/cirurgia , Linfonodo Sentinela/diagnóstico por imagem , Verde de Indocianina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Prognóstico , Seguimentos , Corantes/administração & dosagem , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Metástase LinfáticaRESUMO
Introduction: The medical and surgical treatment of endometrial cancer (EC) is evolving toward a more patient-centered and personalized approach. The role of laparoscopic sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for early-stage EC is unclear, and very few data are available for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). The present study investigated the effectiveness of SNB combined with laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with early-stage EC and AEH. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study for the period from January 2018 to December 2023. A total of 102 patients with atypical hyperplasia (n = 20) and early-stage EC (n = 82) findings on diagnostic curettage underwent pelvic sentinel node biopsy during the final operation. Results: Eleven patients (55%) who had initially been diagnosed with AEH were found to have EC in the final pathology report. No lymph node metastases were detected in patients who had initially been diagnosed with AEH; a 3.6% rate of positive SNBs was found in patients with EC. Changes in tumor grade occurred in 31.3% of the patients and changes in FIGO stage in 33%. Bilateral sentinel node (SN) mapping was successful in 94.1% of the patients. The postoperative outcomes were comparable to those of routine clinical practice without SNB. Conclusions: SNB can be safely offered to patients who have precursor lesions and early-stage EC without notably extending surgical times or increasing postoperative morbidity. This approach can be considered and is safe for patients diagnosed with AEH, but it appears to have a rather small impact on these patients.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated ultra-fast confocal fluorescence microscopy (UFCM) as a new modality for pathology practice in head and neck cancer (HNC). This was assessed through an ex vivo study to estimate the accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of interpretation of UFCM images by pathologists for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes in HNC patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy or selective or complete neck dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 44 patients with 32 cN0 and 12 cN+ HNC were included. The macroscopically non-invaded fresh bisected lymph nodes were stained with acridine orange and imaged with Histolog® Scanner (UFCM). Two pathologists interpreted independently the UFCM images postoperatively and gave a consensus diagnosis in case of disagreement. The gold standard was the diagnosis based on hematoxylin-eosin-saffron (HES) sections. RESULTS: 201 lymph nodes were imaged by UFCM. Thirty nodes (15 %) were invaded on final histology: 3 with micrometastases and 27 with macrometastases. The concordance rate between the pathologists on the UFCM images was 192/201 = 95.5 % and the Cohen kappa coefficient was 0.80. The accuracy of UFCM was 95.5 % (95 %CI: 91.7 %-97.9 %) with a high specificity at 98.8 % (95 %CI: 95.8 %-99.9 %) but an insufficient sensitivity at 76.7 % (95 %CI: 57.7 %-90.1 %). The three micrometastases and four of the 27 macrometastases were missed on UFCM images. CONCLUSION: The UFCM is providing promising detection values with a very good specificity and moderate sensitivity carrying room for improvement.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Linfonodos , Metástase Linfática , Microscopia Confocal , Humanos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Microscopia Confocal/métodos , Idoso , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Metástase Linfática/patologia , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Microscopia de Fluorescência/métodos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most diagnosed gynecologic malignancy, and its incidence and mortality are increasing. The prognosis is highly dependent on the disease spread. Surgical staging includes retroperitoneal evaluation to detect potential lymph node metastases. In recent years, systematic lymphadenectomy has been replaced by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and ultrastaging, allowing for the detection of macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells (ITCs). Micrometastases and ITCs have been grouped as low-volume metastases (LVM). The reported prevalence of LVM in studies enrolling more than one thousand patients with apparent early-stage EC ranges from 1.9% to 10.2%. Different rates of LVM are observed when patients are stratified according to disease characteristics and their risk of recurrence. Patients with EC at low risk for recurrence have low rates of LVM, while intermediate- and high-risk patients have a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with nodal metastases, including LVM. Macro- and micrometastases increase the risk of recurrence and cause upstaging, while the clinical significance of ITCs is still uncertain. A recent meta-analysis found that patients with LVM have a higher relative risk of recurrence [1.34 (95% CI: 1.07-1.67)], regardless of adjuvant treatment. In a retrospective study on patients with low-risk EC and no adjuvant treatment, those with ITCs had worse recurrence-free survival compared to node-negative patients (85.1%; CI 95% 73.8-98.2 versus 90.2%; CI 95% 84.9-95.8). However, a difference was no longer observed after the exclusion of cases with lymphovascular space invasion. There is no consensus on adjuvant treatment in ITC patients at otherwise low risk, and their recurrence rate is low. Multi-institutional, prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical significance of ITCs in low-risk patients. Further stratification of patients, considering histopathological and molecular features of the disease, may clarify the role of LVM and especially ITCs in specific contexts.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Data from recently trials have provided practice-changing recommendations in management of the axilla in early breast cancer (eBC). However, further controversies have been raised, resulting in heterogeneous diffusion of these recommendations. Our purpose was to obtain a better homogeneity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 2021, the Tuscan Breast Network (TBN) established a consensus with the aim to update recommendations in this area. We performed a literature review on axillary management in eBC patients which led to an expert Delphi consensus aiming to explore the gray areas, build consensus and propose evidence-based suggestions for an appropriate management. Thereafter, we investigate their implementation in clinical practice. RESULTS: (1) DCIS patients should have SLN biopsy only in case of mastectomy or in conservative surgery if tumor is in a location that would preclude future nodal sampling or in case of a mass; (2) ALND may be omitted for 1-2 positive SLN patients undergoing BCS in T1-2 tumors with 1-2 SLN positive, eligible for whole-breast irradiation and adjuvant systemic therapies; (3) consider the option of RNI in patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes and one or more high-risk characteristics; (4) the population identified in 2) should NOT undergo lymph node irradiation as an alternative to axillary surgery and (5) patients with clinically (pre-operatively) positive axilla, or undergoing primary systemic therapy, or outside the criteria reported in 2) must receive additional ALND and/or RT as per local policy. CONCLUSION: This consensus provided a practical tool to stimulate local and national breast surgical and radiotherapy protocols.
Assuntos
Axila , Neoplasias da Mama , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Feminino , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Itália , Excisão de Linfonodo , Consenso , Metástase Linfática , MastectomiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: For breast cancer with advanced regional lymph node involvement, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains the standard of care for staging and treating the axilla despite the presence of undissected lymph nodes. The benefit of ALND in this setting is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe national patterns of care of axillary surgery and its association with overall survival (OS) among women with cN2b-N3c breast cancer who receive adjuvant radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified female patients with cN2b-N3c breast cancer from 2012 to 2017 from the National Cancer Database. Clinical and demographic information were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum and χ2 tests. Predictors of receipt of ALND and predictors of death were identified with multivariable logistic regression modeling. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was implemented to adjust for differences in treatment cohorts. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate OS. RESULTS: We identified 7167 patients. Of these, 922 (13%) received SLNB and 6254 (87%) received ALND; 7% were cN2b, 19% cN3a, 24% cN3b, 19% cN3c, and 31% cN3, not otherwise specified. Predictors of receipt of ALND were age 50-69 years [odds ratio (OR) 1.3, p < 0.01], cN3a (OR 7.6, p < 0.01), cN3b (OR 2.8, p < 0.01), and cN3c (OR 4.2, p < 0.01). Predictors of death included cN3c (OR 1.9, p < 0.01), age 70-90 years (OR 1.5, p = 0.01), and positive surgical margins (OR 1.5, p < 0.01). After cohort balancing, ALND was not associated with improved OS when compared with SLNB (HR 0.99, p = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: ALND in patients with advanced nodal disease was not associated with improved survival compared with SLNB for women who receive adjuvant radiotherapy.
Assuntos
Axila , Neoplasias da Mama , Excisão de Linfonodo , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Excisão de Linfonodo/mortalidade , Idoso , Taxa de Sobrevida , Seguimentos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) as part of radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC) remains unclear. Sentinel-based and lymphangiographic approaches could lead to reduced morbidity without sacrificing oncologic safety. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic value of fluorescence-guided template sentinel region dissection (FTD) using a handheld near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) camera in open radical cystectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: After peritumoral cystoscopic injection of indocyanine green (ICG) 21 patients underwent open RC with FTD due to BC between June 2019 and June 2021. Intraoperatively, the FIS-00 Hamamatsu Photonics® NIRF camera was used to identify and resect fluorescent template sentinel regions (FTRs) followed by extended pelvic lymphadenectomy (ePLND) as oncological back-up. OUTCOME MEASUREMENT AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive analysis of positive and negative results per template region. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: FTRs were identified in all 21 cases. Median time (range) from ICG injection to fluorescence detection was 75 (55-125) minutes. On average (SD), 33.4 (9.6) lymph nodes were dissected per patient. Considering template regions as the basis of analysis, 67 (38.3%) of 175 resected regions were NIRF-positive, with 13 (7.4%) regions harboring lymph node metastases. We found no metastatic lymph nodes in NIRF-negative template regions. Outside the standard template, two NIRF-positive benign nodes were identified. CONCLUSION: The concept of NIRF-guided FTD proved for this group all lymph node metastases to be found in NIRF-positive template regions. Pending validation in a larger collective, resection of approximately 40% of standard regions may be sufficient and may result in less morbidity.
Assuntos
Cistectomia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico por imagem , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Excisão de Linfonodo/instrumentação , Cistectomia/métodos , Cistectomia/instrumentação , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Verde de Indocianina , Estudos de Viabilidade , Fluorescência , Prognóstico , Seguimentos , Espectroscopia de Luz Próxima ao Infravermelho/métodos , Espectroscopia de Luz Próxima ao Infravermelho/instrumentação , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , CorantesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Subungual melanoma (SUM) is a rare tumor with historically poor outcomes. Thus, the benefit of proximal versus distal amputation in SUM remains unclear. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our prospectively-maintained institutional melanoma database, including SUM and non-subungual acral melanoma (AM) patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between 1999 and 2022. All SUMs had distal joint or proximal amputations. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS). Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Tests were repeated on propensity score matched (PSM) populations in a 2:1 ratio. RESULTS: 123 patients underwent resection with SLNB for SUM (n â= â27) and AM (n â= â96). Median follow-up was 9.2 years. Unadjusted median OS was 149.1 months for AM and 198.1 months for SUM. In the PSM comparison, median OS and RFS remained comparable between SUM and AM (149.5 months versus 198.1 months; p â= â0.612). Sentinel node positivity was associated with significantly worse overall survival outcome (Hazard Ratio 5.49; CI (1.59-18.97), p â= â0.007). In the PSM population, male sex was also associated with a significant hazard of death (HR 3.00, CI (1.03-8.71), p â= â0.043). Proximal amputations were associated with significantly worse OS (p â< â0.002) and RFS (p â< â0.01) compared to distal amputations in SUM. CONCLUSION: SUM was well-treated with distal amputations, and had better OS and RFS compared to SUM treated with proximal amputations. Sentinel lymph node status is an important prognostic factor for SUMs and AMs. SUMs can be treated similarly to AMs with comparably good long-term outcomes.
Assuntos
Melanoma , Doenças da Unha , Linfonodo Sentinela , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Prognóstico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças da Unha/patologia , Doenças da Unha/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess 5-year oncologic outcomes of apparent early-stage high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer undergoing sentinel node mapping versus systematic lymphadenectomy. METHODS: This is a multi-institutional retrospective, propensity-matched study evaluating data of high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer (according to ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines) undergoing sentinel node mapping versus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (with and without para-aortic lymphadenectomy). Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods. RESULTS: Overall, the charts of 242 patients with high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer were retrieved. Data on 73 (30.1%) patients undergoing hysterectomy plus sentinel node mapping were analyzed. Forty-two (57.5%) and 31 (42.5%) patients were classified in the high-intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively. Unilateral sentinel node mapping was achieved in all patients. Bilateral mapping was achieved in 67 (91.7%) patients. Three (4.1%) patients had site-specific lymphadenectomy (two pelvic areas only and one pelvic plus para-aortic area), while adjunctive nodal dissection was omitted in the hemipelvis of the other three (4.1%) patients. Sentinel nodes were detected in the para-aortic area in eight (10.9%) patients. Twenty-four (32.8%) patients were diagnosed with nodal disease. A propensity-score matching was used to compare the aforementioned group of patients undergoing sentinel node mapping with a group of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy. Seventy patient pairs were selected (70 having sentinel node mapping vs. 70 having lymphadenectomy). Patients undergoing sentinel node mapping experienced similar 5-year disease-free survival (HR: 1.233; 95%CI: 0.6217 to 2.444; p = 0.547, log-rank test) and 5-year overall survival (HR: 1.505; 95%CI: 0.6752 to 3.355; p = 0.256, log-rank test) than patients undergoing lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel node mapping does not negatively impact 5-year outcomes of high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer. Further prospective studies are warranted.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Linfonodo Sentinela , Feminino , Humanos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Linfonodos/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The rate of occult metastasis in lip cancer is poorly studied. Management of the regional nodal basin in lip cancer is thus controversial. This study sought to understand the true rate of micrometastasis in lip cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of English language studies reporting lip cancer sentinel node biopsy results. Studies were obtained from the PubMed database between the years 2000 and 2023 using the search terms "sentinel node biopsy" and "squamous cell carcinoma." Random effect and fixed effect meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria. Low heterogeneity was noted among the studies, as indicated by the I2 inconsistency test (I2 = 0%). The rate of occult metastasis ranged between 0 and 33% (mean 9%). A total of 189 lip sentinel node biopsies had been performed. Of these, 21 revealed occult nodal metastasis (11.1%, 95% CI 7.36%-16.44%). One step, generalized linear mixed modeling revealed the true rate of occult nodal metastasis to be 10% (95% CI (0.0504, 0.1746), p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The rate of occult metastasis in lip cancer approaches the threshold for elective management of the regional nodal basin. Sentinel node biopsy is optimally suited for management of high-risk early T stage lip cancer.