Navigating the 'Triangle of Death': A Multidisciplinary Approach in Severe Multi-Trauma Management.

This case report details the challenging management of a 45-year-old male construction worker who suffered severe multiple injuries after a fall and subsequent collision with cement mixers. The patient presented with extensive injuries, including amputation, fractures and internal bleeding, leading to a state known as the 'triangle of death'. Despite the initial grim prognosis, evidenced by an ISS score of 28 and a mortality risk coefficient of 89.56%, the patient was successfully resuscitated and managed through a multidisciplinary approach. This included damage control resuscitation, emergency vascular interventions and targeted temperature management for brain protection. The patient's recovery highlights the effectiveness of comprehensive trauma management and the critical role of coordinated care in severe multi-trauma cases.

Effect of access to the integrated treatment model for patients with multiple severe injuries in the Chinese population.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to enhance the effectiveness of an integrated treatment model for patients with severe multiple injuries in China. METHODS: In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 110 patients with multiple severe injuries. These patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment model they received. The first group, called the MDTM group, received the integrated treatment model, which involved a multidisciplinary team-based approach. The second group, designated the TSM group, received the traditional specialist-based treatment model. The primary outcome measure was the survival rate of patients after treatment. Secondary outcomes included the time spent on hospital emergency treatment, the length of hospital stay, the mortality rate, and family satisfaction. RESULTS: The survival rate of patients after treatment in the MDTM group (83.93%) was significantly greater than that in the TSM group (70.37%). Consequently, the mortality of patients after treatment in the MDTM group (16.07%) was significantly lower than that in the TSM group (29.63%). Furthermore, the MDTM group demonstrated significantly shorter durations of rescue efforts and shorter hospital stays. Additionally, family satisfaction was significantly greater in the MDTM group. CONCLUSION: The integrated treatment model shows potential for optimizing outcomes for patients with multiple severe injuries and generating higher levels of family satisfaction. This model holds practical applicability in the context of China and may help alleviate the strained relationship between physicians and patients.

Diagnostic Value of Pulmonary Ultrasound and Arterial Blood Gas Analysis in Acute Patients with Severe Injuries Complicated by Respiratory Failure-A Retrospective Study.

Background: To investigate the early application of pulmonary ultrasonography and arterial blood gas analysis in critical patients with severe multiple injuries exacerbated by respiratory failure. Patients and Methods: The retrospective selection was performed on 81 patients admitted to our critical care unit between January 2020 and January 2021 with severe multiple injuries rendered worse by respiratory failure. Based on the different examination procedures, the patients were categorised into three groups (n=27): group A; diagnosed with pulmonary ultrasonography, group B; diagnosed with arterial blood gas; and group C; diagnosed with both pulmonary ultrasonography and arterial blood gas analyses. Patients were subsequently divided into a survival group (n = 65) and a death group (n = 16). On an annual basis, patients' prognoses were examined in relation to the predictive value of pulmonary ultrasound. Results: Initial diagnosis, diagnosis, and initial correct treatment times were significantly shorter in groups B and C than group A (P<0.05). In contrast, initial diagnosis time, diagnosis time, and initial correct treatment times were potentially shorter in group C than in group B (P<0.05). Compared to groups B and C, group A had a considerably lower diagnosis rate for the examination methods (P<0.05). The right diaphragm displacement and left diaphragm displacement in the survival group were potentially higher than the LUS score (P < 0.05). In contrast, the survival group's lung ultrasound score (LUS) was considerably lower than the death group's. Statistical analysis showed that the predictive values of right diaphragm displacement, left diaphragm displacement, and mean diaphragm displacement were significant compared with the LUS score. The findings of the receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that the right, left, and average diaphragm displacements had high predictive values. Conclusion: In the early evaluation of patients with severe multiple injuries complicated by respiratory failure, pulmonary ultrasonography combined with arterial blood gas analysis is crucial for the rapid diagnosis and prognosis prediction of patients.