An effective approach for the treatment of severe punctal stenosis: Bicanalicular silicone tube intubation with pigtail probe.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of using a pigtail probe to open the inferior punctum followed by bicanalicular silicone tube intubation in patients with severe acquired punctal stenosis. METHODS: Forty-one eyes of 25 patients with severe inferior punctal stenosis admitted to our tertiary care center were included in the study. The degree of epiphora was determined using the Munk score and the fluorescein disappearance test. The inferior punctum was located and opened by entering the superior punctum with a pigtail probe. Then, bicanalicular silicone tube intubation was performed. The silicone tube was removed after six months. A Munk score of 0 or 1 and a fluorescein disappearance test score of 1 and 2 were considered a complete success. RESULTS: Ten (40%) patients were male, and 15 (60%) were female. The mean age was 60.4±15.5years. One year after the surgery, epiphora was absent in 18 eyes (43.9%) (Munk score grade 0) and rarely seen in 9 eyes (22%) (Munk score grade 1). At the one-year follow-up, the fluorescein disappearance test score was stage 1 (<3min) in 21 eyes (51.2%) and stage 2 (3-5min) in 13 eyes (31.7%). There was a statistically significant difference between the preoperative and one-year postoperative test results (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: In cases with severe punctal stenosis, a pigtail probe is an effective method for locating and opening the punctum, and punctal opening and prevention of restenosis were achieved by a bicanalicular stent.

Comparison of the surgical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in chronic dacryocystitis with or without previous bicanalicular silicone tube intubation.

AIMS: To compare the outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR) in chronic dacryocystitis (CD) with or without previous bicanalicular silicone tube intubation (BSTI), and investigate whether previous BSTI influenced postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of CD patients (group A) who had previously undergone BSTI for nasolacrimal duct stenosis and an age- and sex-matched control group of CD patients (group B) without previous intubation receiving En-DCR from November 2017 to January 2022. Sixty-one patients (61 eyes) were included in group A and age- and sex-matched 122 patients (122 eyes) in group B. Dacryocystic parameters were measured by computed tomography-dacryocystography and surgical findings were recorded during surgeries. The surgical success rates of the two groups were compared at 12 months post-operation. RESULTS: The mean horizontal, sagittal, and vertical lengths were 6.06 ± 1.24, 6.03 ± 1.44, and 8.05 ± 2.00 mm, respectively, in group A and 6.33 ± 1.25, 6.26 ± 1.19, and 10.40 ± 2.45 mm, respectively, in group B. There were no differences in the horizontal or sagittal parameters between the two groups. The vertical parameter in group A was significantly lower than that in group B. Scar formation in the sac was observed in 54 patients in group A but was absent in group B. At 12 months postoperatively, the anatomical and functional success rates were 88.52 % and 85.25 %, respectively, in group A and 92.62 % and 89.34 %, respectively, in group B, with no difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Previous BSTI reduced dacryocyst vertical parameter and caused dacryocyst scar formation but did not affect postoperative En-DCR efficacy.

Comparison of Outcomes of Silicone Tube Intubation with or without Dacryoendoscopy for the Treatment of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.

In this retrospective study, we compared and analyzed two groups of patients who underwent silicone tube intubation (STI) to treat congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNDO). We employed dacryoendoscopy to visualize the lacrimal pathways of one group. In total, 85 eyes of 69 patients were included (52 of 41 patients in the non-dacryoendoscopy and 33 eyes of 28 patients in the dacryoendoscopy group). Clinical characteristics, dacryoendoscopic findings, and surgical outcomes were evaluated. The overall STI success rate was 91.8%, and the success rate was significantly higher in the dacryoendoscopy versus non-dacryoendoscopy group (97.0% and 88.5%, respectively). For patients < 36 months of age, the success rate was 100% (23 eyes). All patients with Hasner valve membranous obstructions were younger than 36 months and had structural obstructions of the lacrimal drainage system (LDS) (p = 0.04). However, in patients lacking Hasner valve obstructions, LDS secretory (50.0%) and structural (50%) obstructions occurred at similar rates, which did not vary by age. Dacryoendoscopy-assisted STI enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of CNDO and identified diverse CNDO etiologies beyond Hasner valve obstructions. These findings emphasize the potential advantages of dacryoendoscopy in surgical treatment for CNDO patients.

Balloon Dacryocystoplasty with Pushed Monocanalicular Intubation as a Primary Management for Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.

Given the improvement in the instrument and techniques, novel surgical interventions emerged to avoid the osteotomy from the gold standard dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) for treating primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). This study's aim is to compare the surgical outcomes of antegrade balloon dacryocystoplasty (DCP) with pushed monocanalicular intubation (MCI) to balloon DCP alone in patients with complete PANDO. Adult patients with complete PANDO receiving balloon DCP followed by pushed MCI or balloon DCP alone from December 2014 to May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 37 eyes of 29 patients were treated with balloon DCP with pushed MCI for 1 month, whereas 35 eyes of 28 patients were treated with balloon DCP alone. The success rates at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after operation were 89.2%, 73.0%, and 70.2%, respectively, in balloon DCP with MCI group, and 62.9%, 62.9%, and 60.0%, respectively, in the balloon DCP alone group. The balloon DCP with pushed MCI group had a better success rate but only reached statistical significance at 1 month postoperatively (p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis was performed based on age. The success rate in those under 65 in the combined balloon DCP with MCI group was significantly higher than in balloon DCP alone group (72.7% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.004), whereas there was no significant difference between those aged at least 65 in the combined group and the balloon DCP alone group (69.2% vs. 83.3%, p = 0.2). Conclusively, there was no significant difference in the success rate between antegrade balloon DCP with and without pushed MCI in general. Nevertheless, the former procedure was associated with significantly higher surgical success rate than the latter in younger patients.

Trephination and silicone tube intubation in the treatment of canalicular obstruction.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of trephination and monocanalicular/bicanalicular silicone tube use depending on the number of affected canaliculi in patients with canalicular obstruction. METHODS: This retrospective study included 46 eyes of 36 patients who underwent trephination and silicone tube intubation performed by a single experienced oculoplastic surgeon due to canalicular obstruction between 2005 and 2020. Monocanalicular silicone tube was applied to patients with one canalicular obstruction, and bicanalicular silicone tube was applied to those with the upper and lower canalicular involvement of the same eye. Canalicular obstructions were divided into groups according to their localization as proximal, middle, and distal. The silicone tubes were kept in place for at least 5 months after the operation, and the follow-up duration of the patients was at least 12 months. RESULTS: Twenty (55.6%) patients were female and 16 (44.4%) were male. The mean age was 15.82 ± 7.02 years in the treatment success group and 28.87 ± 12.74 years in the treatment failure group (p = 0.001). While 67.6% of the eyes in the treatment success group had monocanalicular obstruction (monocanalicular silicone tube applied), 66.7% of those in the treatment failure group had bicanalicular obstruction (bicanalicular silicone tube applied) (p = 0.049). The most common distal obstruction was seen in the treatment success group, and the least distal obstruction and the most proximal obstruction were observed in the treatment failure group (p < 0.001). The mean duration silicone tube stay was 9.37 ± 1.96 months in the treatment success group and 7.25 ± 1.42 months in the treatment failure group (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: We consider that trephination with the use of a monocanalicular or bicanalicular silicone tube depending on the number of affected canaliculi can be the first choice of treatment in canalicular obstruction due to its high success rate, especially in distal obstruction.

Dacryoendoscopic Findings in the Failed Silicone Tube Intubations without Dacryoendoscopy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical characteristics and dacryoendoscopic findings and clinical efficacy of silicone tube intubation (STI) in the patients who referred to our center due to failed with conventional STI. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 61 cases from 50 patients who underwent STI or endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy using dacryoendoscopy from January 2016 to May 2021. Clinical characteristics, tear meniscus height, lacrimal irrigation test, dacryocystographic findings, dacryoendoscopic findings and surgical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 12 male and 38 female patients (mean age, 64.1 ± 13.2 years). In the preoperative lacrimal irrigation test, passage was found in 33 eyes (54.1%) and no passage in 28 eyes (45.9%). The causes of lacrimal duct obstruction were in the order of stenosis (31.1%), mucus (27.9%), membrane (24.6%), granulation (13.1%), and stone (3.3%), and the location were in the order of nasolacrimal duct (39.3%), lacrimal sac (36.1%), canaliculus (21.3%), and inferior meatus (3.3%). As for the characteristics of obstruction, the secretory type was 21 eyes (34.4%), and structural change type was 40 eyes (65.6%). The STI group consisted of 57 eyes (93.4%) and endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy consisted of four eyes (6.6%). The overall success rate was 83.9%. Clinical results were correlated with dacryoendoscopic finding (p = 0.015), but not with lacrimal irrigation test or dacryocystography. The structural change type had a higher surgical success rate than the secretory type (84.4% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.015). In particular, the structural change type showed higher success rate than the secretory type below the lacrimal sac (95.5% vs. 61.9%, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: STI using dacryoendoscopy has a higher surgical success rate than conventional STI since dacryoendoscopy provides direct visualization of nasolacrimal duct obstruction. It could be useful in increasing the surgical success rate in patients with structural changes below lacrimal sac.

Long-term Efficacy of Dacryoendoscopy-guided Recanalization and Silicone Tube Intubation.

PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term efficacy of dacryoendoscopy-guided recanalization and silicone tube intubation in patients with obstruction in the lacrimal drainage system and to identify factors related to surgical outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction and canalicular obstruction who underwent dacryoendoscopy-guided recanalization and silicone tube intubation between August 2014 and March 2016. Factors related to surgical outcome were examined and compared between the success group (eyes with complete response and partial response) and the failure group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to analyze the success rate according to the factors found to have statistical significance. RESULTS: The study included 74 eyes of 51 patients. The mean age of the patients was 60.3 ± 10.0 years (range, 34-80 years). The success group consisted of 66 eyes (89.2%) (complete response, 56 eyes, 75.7%; partial response, 10 eyes, 13.5%) and the failure group consisted of eight eyes (10.8%). The median follow-up period was 58 months (range, 6.5-72 months), and the overall success rate was 89.2%. Compared to the eyes with preoperative lacrimal irrigation test of partial passage, the eyes with no passage were associated with a lower success rate (95.9% vs. 76.0%, p = 0.01). Postoperative inflammation was also associated with a lower success rate (96.6% vs. 60.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Dacryoendoscopy-guided recanalization and silicone tube intubation is effective and can be considered a first choice of treatment for eyes which show partial passage in the lacrimal irrigation test. The management of postoperative inflammation is essential to ensure surgical success.

Outcomes of Canaliculotomy with and without Silicone Tube Intubation in Management of Primary Canaliculitis.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of canaliculotomy and curettage with and without silicone tube intubation in the treatment of primary canaliculitis. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, interventional case series was performed. Fifty patients diagnosed with unilateral inferior primary canaliculitis underwent canaliculotomy with curettage and were randomly divided into two groups depending on silicone tube intubation. Twenty-five patients were recruited in group A (without intubation) and 25 patients were recruited in group B (with intubation). The resolution of infection, the success rate and postoperative complications observed in both groups were analyzed with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were finally included in the study consisting of 23 patients in group A and 24 patients in group B. There were 33 females and 14 males with a median age of 57 ± 13.9 years (range 29-89 years). All patients recorded complete resolution of canaliculitis and no recurrent infections were observed in the 2 groups during follow-up. A significantly higher number of anatomical and functional successes were achieved in patients in group B (100%, 87.5%) than in group A (78.3%, 60.9%) (P < .05,). The surgical complication of canalicular obstruction was significantly higher in patients in group A (21.7%, 5/23) compared to group B (0/24)(P < .05). CONCLUSION: Canaliculotomy with curettage gives excellent clinical outcomes in the treatment of patients with primary canaliculitis and a higher success rate can be achieved when silicone tube intubation is performed during the procedure. The use of silicone tube intubation may be a necessary choice in canaliculotomy to avoid post-operative canalicular obstruction.

[Influence of different methods of silicone tube intubation on clinical effects and safety of patients with chronic dacryocystitis].

Objective:To investigate the influence of conventional STI and endoscopic STI on clinical effects and safety of patients with chronic dacryocystitis. Method:One hundred and ten patients with chronic dacryocystitis were chosen in the period in our hospital and randomly divided into two groups including conventional group（55 patients） with conventional STI and endoscopy group（55 patients） with endoscopic STI. The improvement rate of epiphora symptoms, ocular surface symptoms score before and after treatment, operation time, intraoperative VAS score and postoperative complication rate of both groups were compared. Result:There was no significant difference in the improvement rate of epiphora symptoms between two groups（P>0.05）. The ocular surface symptoms score after treatment of endoscopy group were significantly less than conventional group（P<0.05）. There was no significant difference in the ocular surface symptoms score after treatment between two groups（P>0.05）. The operation time and intraoperative VAS score of endoscopy group were significantly less than conventional group（P<0.05）. The postoperative complication rate of endoscopy group were significantly lower than conventional group（P<0.05）. Conclusion:Conventional STI and endoscopic STI in the treatment of patients with chronic dacryocystitis possess the same clinical effects; but endoscopic STI application can efficiently reduce operation difficulty, relieve intraoperative pain and prevent postoperative complications.

Combination Surgery of Silicone Tube Intubation and Conjunctival Resection in Patients with Epiphora.

PURPOSE: To compare the success rates of performing only silicone tube intubation versus carrying out both conjunctival resection and silicone tube intubation. METHODS: The subjects of this study involved 62 patients (96 eyes) between October 2015 and May 2017 who were diagnosed as having punctal stricture or nasolacrimal duct stenosis. Out of 96 eyes, 47 underwent only silicone tube intubation, and 49 underwent both silicone tube intubation and conjunctival resection. Three parameters were measured at 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgery: the area of the tear meniscus using RTVue-100 anterior segment optical coherence tomography, the height of the tear meniscus using a slit lamp microscope, and the subjective satisfaction of patients as a result of improved sympotms like epiphora. The surgery was considered successful when the patients' experienced the resolution of symptoms and reduction of the area and height of the tear meniscus. RESULTS: The area of the tear meniscus, height of the tear meniscus, and subjective satisfaction of patients was superior in the group that underwent both silicone tube intubation and conjunctival resection compared silicone tube intubation only. Based on these results, the success rate of the surgery was 68.9% in the group that underwent only silicone tube intubation and 78.7% in the group that underwent both silicone tube intubation and conjunctival resection. CONCLUSIONS: The resection of relaxed plica semilunares seems to increase the success rate of silicone tube intubation through the reduction of the area and height of the tear meniscus. Therefore, after determining the degree of conjunctivochalasis, if it was found to be severe, a combination with conjunctival resection was expected to increase the success rate of the surgery.

Predictors of Silicone Tube Intubation Success in Patients with Lacrimal Drainage System Stenosis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate prognostic factors affecting silicone tube intubation outcomes in Asian patients with lacrimal drainage system stenosis. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of 822 patients (1,118 eyes) who had undergone silicone tube intubation to treat lacrimal drainage system stenosis between January 2011 and December 2012. Patients were divided into two groups: a success group and a failure group. Success was defined as the disappearance of epiphora symptoms, normalization of tear meniscus height, and the easy passage of fluid without resistance on the postoperative syringing test. Patient and ocular parameters were compared between the success and failure groups. RESULTS: A total of 994 eyes of 727 patients were included in analyses. Patients had a mean follow-up period of 34.11 ± 18.70 weeks. Silicone tube intubation was successful in 67.2% of participants. Significant differences between the success and failure groups were found for age (p < 0.001), history of ipsilateral facial palsy (p = 0.028), follow-up period (p < 0.001), and degree of passage on the preoperative syringing test (p = 0.001). Only age (p < 0.001) and degree of passage on the preoperative syringing test (p = 0.002) remained significantly associated with silicone tube intubation success in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Age was negatively associated with silicone tube intubation success in patients with lacrimal drainage system stenosis. The success rate was higher in patients who showed easy passage of fluid without resistance on the preoperative syringing test. These factors should be considered by surgeons planning silicone tube intubation in patients with lacrimal drainage system stenosis.

Early loss of monocanalicular silicone tubes in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: incidence, predictors, and effect on outcome.

PURPOSE: To study predictors and implications on outcome of premature silicone tube-loss, a post-operative complication of monocanalicular intubation (MCI) performed for treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of cases of post-operative loss of monocanalicular silicone tubes occurring at one medical center from January 2007 to December 2013. RESULTS: During the study period monocanclicular silicone tubes were lost in 24/54 eyes (44%) of 19/46 children. Multivariate regression analysis identified bilateral intubation as an important predictor of early tube-loss (r=0.54, P=0.006). Seven of eight (88%) children who had both eyes intubated prematurely lost their tubes compared to 12/38 (32%) children who had unilateral intubation (P=0.005). Treatment success was lower in eyes with early tube-loss (17/24 eyes, 71%) compared to eyes with full tube retention (25/30 eyes, 83%), however this difference was not statistically significant (P=0.333). In our study, treatment outcome correlated with duration of intubation (r=0.51, P=0.002). Surgical success was achieved in 33/39 eyes (85%) in which the tubes were retained at least 2 months compared to 7/15 eyes (47%) with shorter period of intubation (P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous tube-loss is a post-operative complication of monocanalicular silicone intubation that can occur more frequently than previously reported in certain populations. Tube-loss occurring soon after surgery is often associated with persistent symptoms and increased need of reoperation.