Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr ; 123: 105419, 2024 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522381

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Older people are more vulnerable to social frailty due to age, physical condition and socio-economic status. Since social frailty can lead to adverse health outcomes, it is essential to understand the current state of social frailty among community-dwelling older adults. AIMS: To consolidate existing evidence for rates of social frailty and risk factors. METHODS: Two researchers independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed the quality of the studies included in the literature, and calculated the rate of social frailty through a random-effects model with OR and 95 % CI for risk factors. RESULTS: The literature search yielded a total of 81,414 articles, with 28 articles ultimately meeting the study criteria and being included in the meta-analysis. The prevalence of social frailty among community-dwelling older adults was 20.0 % (95 % CI 15.0 %-25.0 %, I2 = 99.5 %, P < 0.001). MSFI and other criteria yielded social frailty rates of 20.6 % and 18.3 %, respectively. The rate of social frailty was 20.2 % for the cross-sectional design and 19.3 % for the cohort design. The prevalence of social frailty is 20.2 % in Asian countries and 17.4 % in European countries. The rate of social frailty is 22.0 % for those aged 75 and over and 17.9 % for those under 75. Multiple chronic conditions, a major illness, marital status, sleep quality, and depressive symptoms are associated with social frailty. CONCLUSION: Social frailty affects nearly one in five community-dwelling older adults, and having multiple chronic conditions, having a major illness, being single, poor sleep quality, and depression are all risk factors for social frailty.


Assuntos
Idoso Fragilizado , Fragilidade , Vida Independente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso Fragilizado/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso Fragilizado/psicologia , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Avaliação Geriátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Vida Independente/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco
2.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 23(7): 1101-1108, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35577010

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine factors associated with distressing social decline and withdrawal during the COVID-19 pandemic for home care recipients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Home care recipients age 18 years or older in Ontario, Canada without severe cognitive impairment with an assessment and follow-up between September 1, 2018 and August 31, 2020. METHODS: Data were collected using the interRAI home care. Outcomes of interest were distressing decline in social participation and social withdrawal. Independent variables were entered into multivariable longitudinal generalized estimating equations. Interaction terms with the pandemic were tested. Those significant at P < .01 were retained in final models and reported as odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: We compared 26,492 and 19,126 home care recipients before and during the pandemic, respectively. The pandemic was associated with greater odds of experiencing distressing social decline (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.22‒1.34) and withdrawal (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04‒1.15). Living alone (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.05‒1.22), frailty (OR 3.21, 95% CI 2.76‒3.73), health instability (OR 2.22, 95% CI 2.02‒2.44), and depression (OR 2.14, 95% CI 2.01‒2.29) increased the odds of distressing social decline. Older age (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.65‒0.77), functional impairment (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.51‒0.67), and receiving caregiving (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.67‒0.79) decreased the odds. Home care recipients with mild/moderate dementia were less likely to experience distressing social decline during the pandemic. Those who lived alone were more likely. Frailty (OR 9.49, 95% CI 7.69‒11.71) and depression (OR 2.76, 95% CI 2.55‒3.00) increased the odds of social withdrawal. Functional impairment (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.27‒0.39), congestive heart failure (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.70‒0.84), and receiving caregiving (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.46‒0.55) decreased the odds. Home care recipients age 18‒64 years and older than 75 years were less likely to experience social withdrawal during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Social support interventions should focus on supporting those living alone, with frailty, health instability, or depression.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Demência , Fragilidade , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Participação Social , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA