Janus kinase inhibitors versus tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: meta-analytical comparison of efficacy and safety.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disorder characterized by persistent inflammation leading to progressively worse disability. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors are pivotal in RA treatment, yet their comparative efficacy remains underexplored. AIM: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors and TNF inhibitors in treating RA using data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: A meta-analysis and outcomes analysis were based on results of the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Patient Global Assessment Scale (PtGA) and other indices as incidences of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and malignancy. RESULTS: The JAK inhibitors caused a statistically significant improvement in the HAQ-DI score [MD = 0.08, 95% CI (0.03, 0.12), p = 0.0008] compared with the TNF inhibitors. However, no significant difference was observed between the two drug classes in the CDAI score [MD = - 2.03, 95% CI (- 9.27, 5.22), p = 0.58]. JAK inhibitors were associated with an increase in the VAS score [MD = 3.62, 95% CI (0.86, 6.38), p = 0.01], but there was no significant difference in the PtGA score [MD = 1.91, 95% CI (- 3.25, 7.08), p = 0.47]. CONCLUSION: JAK inhibitors demonstrated superior efficacy in improving the functional status and reducing the disease activity in RA patients compared with TNF inhibitors. Both drug classes exhibited comparable safety profiles for VTE and malignancies, though JAK inhibitors had a higher risk for thromboembolism.

T cell responses to repeated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and breakthrough infections in patients on TNF inhibitor treatment: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Understanding cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 immunisations is important for informing vaccine recommendations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and other vulnerable patients on immunosuppressive therapies. This study investigated the magnitude and quality of T cell responses after multiple SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses and COVID-19 breakthrough infection. METHODS: This prospective, observational study included patients with IBD and arthritis on tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) receiving up to four SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses. T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 peptides were measured by flow cytometry before and 2-4 weeks after vaccinations and breakthrough infection to assess the frequency and polyfunctionality of responding cells, along with receptor-binding domain (anti-RBD) antibodies. FINDINGS: Between March 2, 2021, and December 20, 2022, 143 patients (118 IBD, 25 arthritis) and 73 healthy controls were included. In patients with either IBD or arthritis, humoral immunity was attenuated compared to healthy controls (median anti-RBD levels 3391 vs. 6280 BAU/ml, p = 0.008) after three SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses. Patients with IBD had comparable quantities (median CD4 0.11% vs. 0.11%, p = 0.26, CD8 0.031% vs. 0.047%, p = 0.33) and quality (polyfunctionality score: 0.403 vs. 0.371, p = 0.39; 0.105 vs. 0.101, p = 0.87) of spike-specific T cells to healthy controls. Patients with arthritis had lower frequencies but comparable quality of responding T cells to controls. Breakthrough infection increased spike-specific CD8 T cell quality and T cell responses against non-spike peptides. INTERPRETATION: Patients with IBD on TNFi have T cell responses comparable to healthy controls despite attenuated humoral responses following three vaccine doses. Repeated vaccination and breakthrough infection increased the quality of T cell responses. Our study adds evidence that, in the absence of other risk factors, this group may in future be able to follow the general recommendations for COVID-19 vaccines. FUNDING: South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Akershus University Hospital, Diakonhjemmet Hospital.

Influence of rheumatoid factor levels and TNF inhibitor structure on secondary nonresponse in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Background: The EXXELERATE study revealed poorer clinical outcomes in patients treated with adalimumab (ADL) and baseline rheumatoid factor (RF) above 203 IU/mL. However, responses were similar in patients treated with certolizumab pegol (CZP) regardless of RF levels. Objectives: This study investigated the impact of RF levels >203 IU/mL on TNF inhibitors (TNFi) serum levels and the association with secondary nonresponse in RA patients treated with TNFi. Methods: We performed an observational ambispective study with RA patients treated with infliximab (IFX), ADL, or CZP. Patients were stratified according to baseline RF levels: ≤ or >203 IU/mL. After 6 months, serum drug levels and antidrug antibodies were measured, and reasons for discontinuation were collected. Results: We included 170 RA patients: 90 (53%) received IFX, 48 (28%) ADL, and 32 (19%) CZP. While CZP serum levels did not differ between RF groups at 6 months (p = 0.6), RF levels >203 IU/mL were linked to lower serum drug levels in patients treated with IFX (p = 0.09) or ADL (p = 0.02). Secondary nonresponse was 3.6 times higher in patients with high versus low RF levels in patients under IFX or ADL. However, the reasons for withdrawal were not affected by RF levels in patients treated with CZP. Conclusion: Baseline RF above 203 IU/mL is associated with lower serum drug levels and an increased risk of discontinuation due to secondary nonresponse in patients treated with IFX or ADL. In contrast, drug levels and clinical outcomes are not significantly impacted by baseline RF levels in patients under CZP.

Treatment strategies for Spondyloarthritis: Implementation of precision medicine - Or "one size fits all" concept?

Spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a term to describe a group of chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases, which have common pathophysiological, genetic, and clinical features. Under the umbrella term SpA, two main groups are subsumed: axial SpA (radiographic axSpA and non-radiographic axSpA) and peripheral SpA (with the leading representative being psoriatic arthritis (PsA) but also arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), reactive arthritis, and undifferentiated pSpA). The key clinical symptom in axSpA is chronic back pain, typically with inflammatory characteristics, which starts in early adulthood, while the leading clinical manifestations of peripheral SpA (pSpA) are arthritis, enthesitis, and/or dactylitis. Furthermore, extra-musculoskeletal manifestations (EMMs) (acute anterior uveitis, psoriasis, and IBD) can accompany axial or peripheral symptoms. All these factors need to be taken into account when making treatment decisions in SpA patients. Despite the major advances in the treatment landscape over the past two decades with the introduction of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and most recently targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs), a relevant proportion of patients still does not achieve the desired state of remission (=absence of disease activity). With this implementation of new treatment modalities, clinicians now have more choices to make in the treatment algorithms. However, despite generalized treatment recommendations, all factors need to be carefully considered when deciding on the optimal treatment strategy for an individual patient in clinical practice, aiming at an important first step towards personalized treatment strategies in SpA. In this narrative review, we focus on the efficacy of approved and emerging treatment options in axSpA and PsA as the main representative of pSpA and discuss their selective effect on the different manifestations associated with SpA to provide guidance on drivers of treatment decisions in specific situations.

Expanding clinical characteristics and genotypic profiling of Yao syndrome in Chinese patients.

Objectives: Yao syndrome (YAOS, OMIM# 617321) is a kind of systemic autoinflammatory diseases (SAIDs) linked to the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing 2 (NOD2). Clinical reports of YAOS in China are sparse. Herein, we reported the largest YAOS cohort of Chinese patients to expand the understanding of its phenotype, genotype, and therapeutic responses. Methods: This study enrolled 15 adult patients diagnosed with YAOS at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from April 2015 to May 2024. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on all patients. Clinical data, genetic variations, and treatment responses were documented and compared with a Caucasian cohort. Results: The mean age of disease onset was 35 ± 17 years old. The most common clinical manifestations included recurrent high-grade fever (100%), gastrointestinal symptoms (73.3%), arthralgia/arthritis, fatigue, myalgia, and lower extremity swelling (46.7%). All patients exhibited elevated acute-phase reactants during episodes. 12 heterozygous NOD2 variants were identified, with Q902K in 4 patients, R471C in 3, and variants c.-14C>T, A110T, S127L, R311W, A432V, Y514H, R541P, A661P, K818Q, A886V each found in individual patients. 90% of the patients responded well to glucocorticoids, and 55.6% to sulfasalazine. 66.7% of patients who received TNF inhibitors achieved complete resolution of symptoms. Additionally, one patient each responded favorably to canakinumab and tocilizumab. Compared to the Caucasian cohort, our cohort exhibited a more balanced gender ratio and a higher proportion of recurrent fever, proteinuria/hematuria as well as more frequent leukocytosis, elevated acute phase reactants, and anemia. Lower proportions of arthralgia/arthritis, skin rashes, headaches, and sicca-like symptoms were noted in our cohort. Moreover, a higher proportion of patients in our cohort showed a good response to TNF inhibitors. Conclusion: Chinese patients with YAOS had more pronounced inflammatory manifestations compared to the Caucasian cohort. Variants c.-14C>T, A110T, S127L, A661P, K818Q, A886V, R471C, and A432V were identified as novel NOD2 variants in YAOS. TNF, IL-6, and IL-1 inhibitors are the promising treatment options. These findings expand the clinical spectrum, genetic profile, and treatment efficacy of YAOS, underscoring the need for heightened awareness of this disease in diverse populations.

HLA-C*06:02 in Danish patients with psoriasis and response to biological treatment.

Whether clinical and genetic markers can be used to differentiate patients with varying responses to different psoriasis therapies needs to be elucidated. Here, we assess whether human leukocyte antigen C (HLA-C)*06:02 is associated with response to biologics. Response to treatment was defined as a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score of ≤2 (PASI≤ 2) after 3 months. In total, 648 patients with psoriasis initiating treatment with biologics were included; 289 were HLA-C*06:02 positive and 359 were HLA-C*06:02 negative. Patients were treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (n = 469), interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitors (n = 92), IL-17 inhibitors (n = 78), and IL-23 inhibitors (n = 9). Significantly more patients positive for HLA-C*06:02 achieved PASI≤ 2 compared with patients negative for HLA-C*06:02 when treated with IL-12/23 inhibitors. There was no significant difference between response in HLA-C*06:02 positive and negative patients for TNF inhibitors or IL-17 inhibitors. No analyses were conducted for IL-23 inhibitors because of the limited number of patients. The data confirm that HLA-C*06:02 may be used as a biomarker for response to anti-IL12/23 treatment.

New and emerging oral therapies for psoriasis.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease affecting 2-3% of the global population. Traditional systemic treatments, such as methotrexate, cyclosporine, acitretin and fumaric acid esters, have limited efficacy and are associated with significant adverse effects, necessitating regular monitoring and posing risks of long-term toxicity. Recent advancements have introduced biologic drugs that offer improved efficacy and safety profiles. However, their high cost and the inconvenience of parenteral administration limit their accessibility. Consequently, there is a growing interest in developing new, targeted oral therapies. Small molecules, such as phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors (e.g. apremilast) and TYK2 inhibitor (e.g. deucravacitinib), have shown promising results with favourable safety profiles. Additionally, other novel oral agents targeting specific pathways, including IL-17, IL-23, TNF, S1PR1 and A3AR, are under investigation. These treatments aim to combine the efficacy of biologics with the convenience and accessibility of oral administration, addressing the limitations of current therapies. This narrative review synthesizes the emerging oral therapeutic agents for psoriasis, focusing on their mechanisms of action, stages of development and clinical trial results.