N-Butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate Adhesive Versus Absorbable Tacks in Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Repair: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Objective: We aimed to determine whether n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NB2C) adhesive is a safe and effective mechanism for nonpenetrating mesh and peritoneal fixation during laparoscopic groin hernia repair. Background: Chronic pain after laparoscopic groin hernia repair has been associated with penetrating fixation, but there had been no US Food and Drug Administration-approved devices for nonpenetrating fixation in this context. Methods: Patients undergoing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAP) or totally extraperitoneal (TEP) groin hernia repair with mesh at 1 of 5 academic medical centers were randomized to mesh (TAP/TEP) and peritoneal (TAP) fixation with NB2C adhesive or absorbable tacks. The primary outcome was improvement in pain (visual analog scale [VAS]) at 6 months. The noninferiority margin was 0.9 (α = 0.025; ß = 80%). Recurrence, successful use of the device, quality of life, and rates of adverse events (AEs) were secondary outcomes. Results: From 2019 to 2021, 284 patients were randomized to either NB2C adhesive or absorbable tacks (n = 142/142). Patient and hernia characteristics were comparable, and 65% were repaired using a TAP approach. The difference in VAS improvement at 6 months with NB2C adhesive was not inferior to absorbable tacks in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively (0.25 [95% CI, -0.33 to 0.82]; P = 0.013; 0.22 [95% CI, -0.36 to 0.80], noninferiority P = 0.011). There were no differences in secondary outcomes including recurrence, successful use of each device to fixate the mesh and peritoneum, quality of life, and additional VAS pain scores. Rates of adverse and serious AEs were also comparable. Conclusions: NB2C adhesive is safe and effective for mesh fixation and peritoneal closure during laparoscopic groin hernia repair.

Initial results of an indigenous absorbable tacker for mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a retrospective analysis of 158 cases.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a Chinese absorbable tack for mesh fixation in laparoscopic abdominal wall hernia repair compared to a widely used similar imported product. METHODS: From May 2019 to December 2020, the clinical data of 158 patients with abdominal wall hernias were analyzed. They were divided into two groups: 76 patients underwent surgery with local absorbable tacks for mesh fixation (experimental group) and 82 patients received a similar imported product (control group). Preoperative and postoperative variables, effectiveness of postoperative immediate fixation, and with ease of handling of instruments were analyzed statistically. Complications and adverse events were followed and analyzed statistically. Meanwhile, medical costs were recorded and evaluated. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic data, hernia types, hernia defects, or number of tacks used for mesh fixation during operation. The effect of postoperative immediate fixation and with ease of handling of instruments in both groups were not significantly different. During the follow-up period, no recurrence or adverse events occurred in either group. No significant differences were noted between the two groups for other complications, such as chronic pain, foreign body sensation, infection of the abdominal wall, hematoma and seroma. There was a significant difference in medical costs between the two groups: the costs associated with the experimental group using local tacks were lower. CONCLUSION: Chinese absorbable tacks for mesh fixation in laparoscopic abdominal wall hernia repair are effective, safe, and economical. They are worthy of clinical application.

Laparoscopic closure of the vaginal rings in the standing horse using a tacked intraperitoneal slitted mesh (TISM) technique.

BACKGROUND: Indirect inguinal herniation (IIH) is a potentially life-threatening condition in stallions. The ideal preventive measure for breeding stallions ensures a minimally invasive closure of the vaginal ring that avoids recurrence of IIH while preserving both testicles. OBJECTIVES: To describe a minimally invasive laparoscopic tacked intra-peritoneal slitted mesh (TISM) technique in the standing horse to close the vaginal rings and to evaluate its efficacy in preventing recurrence of IIH in stallions. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Medical records of 17 stallions with a history of IIH were reviewed retrospectively. The surgical procedure was performed on the standing horse through a flank approach using four laparoscopic portals. The vaginal ring was covered with a commercial mesh. The mesh was partially cut to create a slitted mesh with two flaps: the dorsal flap was passed under the spermatic cord and ductus deferens and the ventral flap above. The mesh was secured in place with laparoscopic tacks. Long-term follow-up was obtained by a structured telephone interview of the owners. RESULTS: A total of 32 laparoscopic vaginal rings closures were successfully performed in 17 horses. No major intra- or postoperative complications occurred. None of the horse suffered from re-occurrence. Nine of the 13 active breeding stallions were breeding again with similar semen quality as before treatment, 4/13 will resume their breeding activity during the next breeding season. None of the horses were castrated and none of the owners reported abnormal size or shape of the testicles. In three stallions, post-operative pain and activity limitations were noted that gradually resolved after 6 months. MAIN LIMITATIONS: The lack of large numbers to compare the results of different mesh and tack combinations, the lack of follow-up veterinary examinations and the limited number of laparoscopic rechecks. CONCLUSION: The TISM technique is an effective minimally invasive technique to surgically reduce the size of the vaginal ring and thereby prevent recurrence of IIH.

Assessment of ideal ratio of mesh area to number of fixation tacks in laparoscopic ventral and incisional IPOM Plus hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: To clarify the optimum mesh-tack ratio MTR (mesh area in cm2 divided by the number of fixation tacks) in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair, we compared IPOM Plus procedures with more intensive mesh fixation to those with standard mesh fixation. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, 84 patients (mean hernia width 6.6 ± 4.4 cm) intraoperatively received an intensive mesh fixation I-IPOM Plus with MTR ≤ 4:1 (e.g. ,150 cm2 mesh fixed by 50 tacks) and 74 patients (mean hernia width 6.7 ± 3.4 cm) received a standard mesh fixation S-IPOM Plus with MTR > 4:1 (e.g., 150 cm2 mesh fixed by 30 tacks) at a community hospital between 2014 and 2017. Outcomes in recurrence rates, immediate and chronic postoperative pain, as well as long-term functionality of the abdominal wall were then evaluated. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up time of 34 months, a 2.3% recurrence rate in I-IPOM Plus patients and a 13.5% recurrence rate in S-IPOM Plus patients were recorded (p = 0.018). The recurrence was associated with large hernia > 10 cm (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.4) and MTR > 5 (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-3.8) in the multivariate analysis. There was a positive correlation between immediate postoperative pain intensity measured on day 7 and number of fixation tacks placed (I-IPOM Plus: mean 4.5 ± 2.5 VAS versus S-IPOM Plus: mean 2.7 ± 2.0 VAS, p = 0.001). However, there were no outcome differences in terms of length of immediate postoperative pain experience, sick leave duration, chronic pain rate and long-term abdominal wall functionality between these two groups. CONCLUSION: For ventral and incisional hernia patients with multiple recurrence risk factors, a mesh-tack ratio MTR ≤ 4:1 should be applied in laparoscopic IPOM Plus procedures.

Laparoscopic patch repair of a Morgagni hernia in Menkes disease.

The association between Morgagni hernia and Menkes disease has not yet been described. Here, we report such a rare association in an 8-year-old boy who presented with subocclusive symptoms. He successfully underwent laparoscopic repair with a patch. The patch was fixed to the anterior abdominal wall by using transfascial sutures with extracorporeal knot tying and to the remaining edges of the diaphragmatic defect by using intracorporeal suturing and spiral tacks. At the 2-year follow-up, the child remained recurrence-free and without gastrointestinal symptoms. The potential relationship between the two conditions and the controversial use of spiral tacks to affix the mesh to the diaphragm are also discussed.

Fixing tacks induced bladder erosion and recurrent stones following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Hernia mesh erosion into the urinary bladder is a rare complication of hernioplasty, and mesh immigration is the most probable pathophysiology. There is no report describing mesh erosion induced by fixing tacks in inguinal hernia repair. CASE PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with frequency, urgency and odynuria for 3 months. He received open right inguinal hernia repair in September 2014, and right laparoscopic hernioplasty for recurrence of the inguinal hernia in May 2015. In February 2019, he underwent a day-case transurethral cystoscopic operation for urethral and bladder stones. Cystoscopy revealed the existence of bladder stones and part of the eroded mesh on the right anterior wall, for which an open partial cystectomy was performed. The patient was followed up for 3 months postoperatively, during which no further mesh erosion or stone recurrence was detected by cystoscopy. CONCLUSION: This is the first case report describing mesh erosion into the urinary bladder by fixing tacks following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. In such a case, the eroded mesh and tacks need to be removed completely, but the effectiveness of a single transurethral procedure needs to be verified in more cases.

Mesh fixation in open IPOM procedure with tackers or sutures? A randomized clinical trial with preliminary results.

PURPOSE: In open intra-peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) hernia repair, mesh fixation can be done by tacks, sutures or fibrin glue. There are randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on laparoscopic IPOM procedure, but no RCT so far has examined mesh fixation techniques in open IPOM repair. METHODS: In a single-center RCT, 48 patients undergoing open IPOM repair of an abdominal wall hernia were included. After randomization, surgery was performed in a standardized fashion. Hernia size, extent of mesh fixation, and duration of surgery were documented. The primary endpoint was postoperative pain intensity. Secondary endpoints were: complications, length of stay, quality of life, return to work, hernia recurrence. Follow-up was 1 year in all 48 patients. RESULTS: After using tacks, mean pain intensity was 16.9, which is slightly lower than after suture fixation (19.6, p = 0.20). The duration of surgery was about the same (83 vs. 85 min). When using tack fixation, significantly more fixation points were applied as compared to sutures (19 vs. 12; p = 0.02), although mesh size was similar. The complication rate was similar (tacks: 6/28 vs. sutures: 3/20). Cost of suture fixation was about 26 €, which is markedly lower than the 180 € associated with tacks. However, surgeons clearly preferred mesh fixation with tacks, because it is more comfortable especially in small hernias. CONCLUSIONS: The present study failed to show an advantage of tacks over suture fixation and even there are more severe adverse events. Using tacks significantly increases the costs of hernia repair.

Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair with Absorbable Tacks in a Long Term Follow-up: A Retrospective Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernia Repair (LIVHR) is a safe and worldwide accepted procedure performed using absorbable tacks. The aim of the study was to evaluate recurrence rate in a long term follow-up and whether the results of laparoscopic IVH repair in the elderly (≥65 years old) are different with respect to results obtained in younger patients. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine consecutive patients (74 women and 55 men, median age 67 years, range = 30-87 years) with ventral (N = 42, 32.5%) or post incisional (N = 87, 67.5%) hernia were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to their age: group A (N = 55, 42.6%) aged <65 years and group B (N = 74, 57.4%) aged ≥65 years. RESULTS: The mean operative time was not significantly different between groups (66.7 ± 37 vs. 74 ± 48.4 min, p = 0.4). To the end of 2016, seven recurrences had occurred (group A = 3, group B = 4, p = 1). Complications occurred in 8 (16%) patients in group A and 21 (28.3%) patients in group B. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our results confirm that the use of absorbable tacks does not increase recurrence frequency and laparoscopic incisional and ventral repair is a safety procedure also in elderly patients.

Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive incisional hernia repair has been established as a safe and efficient surgical option in most centres worldwide. Laparoscopic technique includes the placement of an intraperitoneal onlay mesh with fixation achieved using spiral tacks or sutures. An additional step is the closure of the fascial defect depending upon its size. Key outcomes in the evaluation of ventral abdominal hernia surgery include postoperative pain, the presence of infection, seroma formation and hernia recurrence. TACKoMESH is a randomised controlled trial that will provide important information on the laparoscopic repair of an incisional hernia; 1) with fascial closure, 2) with an IPOM mesh and 3) comparing the use of an articulating mesh-fixation device that deploys absorbable tacks with a straight-arm mesh-fixation device that deploys non-absorbable tacks. METHODS: A prospective, single-centre, double-blinded randomised trial, TACKoMESH, will establish whether the use of absorbable compared to non-absorbable tacks in adult patients undergoing elective incisional hernia repair produces a lower rate of pain both immediately and long-term. Eligible and consenting patients will be randomized to surgery with one of two tack-fixation devices and followed up for a minimum one year. Secondary outcomes to be explored include wound infection, seroma formation, hernia recurrence, length of postoperative hospital stay, reoperation rate, operation time, health related quality of life and time to return to normal daily activity. DISCUSSION: With ongoing debate around the best management of incisional hernia, continued trials that will add substance are both necessary and important. Laparoscopic techniques have become established in reducing hospital stay and rates of infection and report improvement in some patient centered outcomes whilst achieving similarly low rates of recurrence as open surgical techniques. The laparoscopic method with tack fixation has developed a reputation for its tendency to cause post-operative pain. Novel additions to technique, such as intraoperative-sutured closure of a fascial defect, and developments in surgical technology, such as the evolution of composite mesh design and mesh-fixation devices, have brought about new considerations for patient and surgeon. This study will evaluate the efficacy of several new technical considerations in the setting of elective laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Name of registry - ClinicalTrials.gov Registration number: NCT03434301 . Retrospectively registered on 15th February 2018.

Decreased re-operation rate for recurrence after defect closure in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with a permanent tack fixated mesh: a nationwide cohort study.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether defect closure in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair reduces the re-operation rate for recurrence compared with no defect closure. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Danish Ventral Hernia Database. Adults with an elective laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with tacks used as mesh fixation were included, if their first repair was between the 1st of January 2007 and the 1st of January 2017. Patients with defect closure were compared with no defect closure. Re-operation rates are presented as crude rates and cumulated adjusted re-operation rates. Sub-analyses assessed the effect of the suture material used during defect closure and also whether defect closure affected both primary and incisional hernias equally. RESULTS: Among patients with absorbable tacks as mesh fixation, 443 received defect closure and 532 did not. For patients with permanent tacks, 393 had defect closure and 442 did not. For patients with permanent tacks as mesh fixation, the crude re-operation rates were 3.6% with defect closure and 7.2% without defect closure (p = 0.02). The adjusted cumulated re-operation rate was significantly reduced with defect closure and permanent tacks (hazard ratio = 0.53, 95% confidence interval = 0.28-0.999, p = 0.05). The sub-analysis suggested that defect closure was only beneficial for incisional hernias, and not primary hernias. We did not find any benefits of defect closure for patients with absorbable tacks as mesh fixation. CONCLUSION: This nationwide cohort study showed a reduced risk of re-operation for recurrence if defect closure was performed in addition to permanent tacks as mesh fixation during laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.

Adding sutures to tack fixation of mesh does not lower the re-operation rate after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: There are various ways of fixating an intraperitoneal onlay mesh during a laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. The risk of complications is high, and around 22% of the hernias will recur within 3.5 years. The aim of this study was to assess if sutures in addition to tack fixation would reduce the re-operation rate for recurrence compared with permanent tacks without sutures. METHODS: This study was based on the data from the nationwide Danish Ventral Hernia Database, which contains information of ventral hernia repairs from all hospitals in Denmark. Two different cohorts of patients were created and analyzed separately. The primary outcome was the re-operation rate for recurrence, analyzed with the Cox regression model and illustrated with a Kaplan-Meier plot adjusted for confounders. The follow-up period was defined as months from the first hernia repair to re-operation for recurrence, death, or the 1st of June 2017. RESULTS: The first cohort included 598 patients with absorbable sutures and tacks compared with 1793 patients with permanent tacks. The second cohort included 72 patients with permanent sutures and tacks compared with 216 patients with permanent tacks. In the suture groups, the tack material was either permanent or absorbable. When adjusting for possible confounders in the Cox regression model, there were no significant differences in the re-operation rate for recurrence between the groups in the two cohorts. CONCLUSION: Adding sutures, either absorbable or permanent, to tack fixation of mesh during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair did not influence the re-operation rates for recurrence.

Absorbable versus non-absorbable tacks for mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the outcomes of absorbable versus non-absorbable tacks in patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. METHODS: We performed a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards. We conducted a search of electronic information sources, including MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry; ClinicalTrials.gov; and ISRCTN Register, and bibliographic reference lists to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating outcomes of absorbable versus non-absorbable tacks for mesh fixation in patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the risk of bias of RCTs and observational studies, respectively. Fixed-effect or random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. RESULTS: We identified three RCTs and two observational studies enrolling a total of 1149 patients. The included patients were comparable in terms of age [Mean difference (MD) 0.28, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -1.45-2, P = 0.75], male gender (MD 0.81, 95% CI 0.63-1.04, P = 0.10), body mass index (MD -041, 95% CI -1.28-0.46, P = 0.36) and hernia defect size (MD 0.12, 95% CI -0.26-0.49, P = 0.54). The mean and median follow-up period was 30 months and 13 months, respectively There was no difference between the two mesh fixation techniques in terms of recurrence [Risk difference (RD) 0.03, 95% CI -0.04, 0.09, P = 0.47], chronic pain [Odds ratio (OR) 0.91, 95% CI 0.62-1.33, P = 0.64], seroma (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.37-2.60, P = 0.96), haematoma (RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.04- 0.04, P = 0.99), prolonged ileus (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.24-4.03, P = 0.99), length of hospital stay (MD 0.10, 95% CI -0.36-0.56, P = 0.68) and port-site hernia (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.13-7.16, P = 0.98). The operative time was longer in absorbable tack group (MD 7.53, 95% CI 1.49-13.58, P = 0.01). The results remain consistent when randomised trials were analysed separately. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in clinical outcomes between absorbable and non-absorbable tacks for mesh fixation in patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. The quality of the available evidence is moderate with a possibility of type 2 error. High quality RCTs with adequate statistical power are required to provide more robust basis for definite conclusions. Considering the similarity of both techniques in terms of clinical outcomes, the cost-effectiveness of each technique would be an important outcome determining which technique should be used; this needs to be considered as an outcome of interest in future studies.

A word of caution: never use tacks for mesh fixation to the diaphragm!

BACKGROUND: The mesh fixation technique used in repair of hiatal hernias and subxiphoid ventral and incisional hernias must meet strenuous requirements. In the literature, there are reports of life-threatening complications with cardiac tamponade and a high mortality rate on using tacks. The continuing practice of tack deployment for mesh fixation to the diaphragm and esophageal hiatus should be critically reviewed. METHODS: In a systematic search of the available literature in May 2017, 23 cases of severe penetrating cardiac complications were identified. The authors became aware of two other cases in which they acted as medical experts. Furthermore, the instructions for use issued by the manufacturers of the tacks were reviewed with regard to their deployment in the diaphragm. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 25 cases (92%) with severe cardiac injuries and subsequent cardiac tamponade were triggered by the use of tacks in the diaphragm. In six cases (24%), these related to ventral and incisional hernias with extension to the subxiphoid area, and in 19 cases (76%) to mesh-augmented hiatoplasty. Twelve of 25 (48%) patients died as a result of pericardial and/or heart muscle injury with cardiac tamponade despite heart surgery intervention. In the tack manufacturers' instructions for use, their deployment in the diaphragm, in particular in the vicinity of the heart, is contraindicated. Likewise, the existing guidelines urgently advise against the use of tacks in the diaphragm, recommending instead alternative fixation techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Tacks should not be used for mesh fixation in the diaphragm above the costal arch.

Comparison of mesh fixation devices for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: an experimental study on human anatomic specimens.

BACKGROUND: As there is a lack of clarity in terms of the tensile strength of mesh fixation for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR), our aim was to investigate the immediate tensile strength of currently available mesh fixation devices on human anatomic specimens. METHODS: Sixteen recently deceased body donators (mean body mass index of 24.4 kg/m2) were used to test the immediate tensile strength (Newton) of 11 different LVHR mesh fixation devices. RESULTS: Each of the 11 different laparoscopic fixation devices was tested 44 times. Non-articulating tackers provided higher fixation resistance to tensile stress in comparison to articulating tackers (5.1-mm ReliaTack™: 16.9 ± 8.7 N vs. 12.2 ± 5.6 N, p = 0.013; 7-mm ReliaTack™: 19.8 ± 9.4 N vs. 15.0 ± 7.0 N, p = 0.007). Absorbable tacks with a greater length, i.e. ≥6 mm (7-mm ReliaTack™, 6-mm SorbaFix™ and 7.2-mm SecureStrap™) had significantly higher fixation tensile strength than tacks with a shorter length, i.e. < 6 mm (5.1-mm ReliaTack™ and 5.1-mm AbsorbaTack™) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, transfascial sutures (PDS 2-0 sutures 26.3 ± 5.6 N) provided superior fixation tensile strength than 5.1-mm AbsorbaTack™ (13.6 ± 7.3 N) and cyanoacrylate glues such as LiquiBand FIX8™ (3.5 ± 2.4 N) (p < 0.001, respectively). There was a significant deterioration in fixation capacity in obese body donators with a body mass index > 30 kg/m2 (13.8 ± 8.0 vs. 17.9 ± 9.7 N, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Although articulating laparoscopic tackers improve accessibility and facilitate the utilization of tacks within the fixation weak spot adjacent to the trocar placement, an articulating shaft that is not ergonomic to use may limit mechanisms of force transmission. For mesh fixation in LVHR, transfascial sutures and tacks with a longer length provide better immediate fixation tensile strength results.

Improved immediate postoperative pain following laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy using self-adhering mesh.

BACKGROUND: Several synthetic meshes are available to reinforce the inguinal region following laparoscopic hernia reduction. We sought to compare postoperative pain of patients who underwent laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy using self-adhering polyester mesh to those who had non-adhering, synthetic mesh implanted using absorbable tacks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of patients who underwent primary laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy at the Medical College of Wisconsin between October 2012 and July 2014. Clinical information and perioperative pain scores using the visual analog scale (VAS) were obtained to evaluate immediate pre and postoperative pain. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients (88 male) underwent laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy during the study interval. Forty-two patients received self-adhering mesh and 56 patients received mesh secured with tacks. Patient demographics and comorbidities did not differ significantly between the two groups. There was no difference in preoperative VAS scores between groups. The self-adhering mesh patients had a lower mean VAS change score (less pain). Postoperative complications did not differ between groups apart from a higher observed incidence of seroma in the self-adhering mesh group (p = 0.04). No hernias recurred in either group during the study interval. CONCLUSIONS: Self-adhering mesh in laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy resulted in less immediate postoperative pain than tacked mesh as demonstrated by VAS score. Postoperative complications were similar between the two groups. The results of this study demonstrate that laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy using self-adhering mesh is comparable to tacked mesh in regards to short-term complication rates, but show a favorable advantage in regards to immediate postoperative pain.

Evaluation of four mesh fixation methods in an experimental model of ventral hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: The present animal study was conducted to comparably investigate the performance of four different fixation techniques of intraperitoneally implanted meshes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen New Zealand white rabbits were used. In each animal, four abdominal wall defects were created and repaired with four pieces of intraperitoneal mesh (Parietex Composite), fixed with nonabsorbable (titanium) spiral tacks (group A), absorbable (lactic and glycolic acid co-polymer) screw-type tacks (group B), transfascial polypropylene sutures (group C), or fibrin glue (group D). Adhesion formation, mesh shrinkage, tensile strength, and host tissue response were evaluated at 90 d. RESULTS: Adhesions were observed in all groups, and differences were not significant. The percentage of shrinkage was higher in group C (26.91%), lower in group D (12%), whereas in groups A and B, the mean shrinkage was 20.17% and 23.33%, respectively (P = 0.032). The incorporation of mesh fixation element to the abdominal wall was 9.18 ± 3.91 N, 6.96 ± 3.0 N, 13.68 ± 5.38 N, and 2.57 ± 1.29 N, in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively (P < 0.001). Regarding local inflammatory response and foreign body reaction, no difference was observed between groups. However, with respect to fibrous tissue presence, its quantity was clearly less in group D compared with the other groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: None of the examined fixation techniques proved to be ideal. Probably, the best way to fixate an intraperitoneally implanted mesh may be achieved using a combination of the studied materials. Prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm the superiority of the combined use of different fixation devices in clinical practice.

Mesh fixation methods and chronic pain after transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia surgery: a comparison between fibrin sealant and tacks.

INTRODUCTION: Mesh fixation techniques have been associated with pain after groin hernia surgery. The aim of this study was to compare fibrin sealant and tacks for mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair regarding long-term persistent pain. METHODS: Through the Danish Hernia Database, we identified patients operated for groin hernia using the transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic technique (TAPP) from 2009 to 2012 with fibrin sealant for mesh fixation. These were matched in a ratio of 1:2 with patients operated with TAPP using tacks. All patients were sent a validated questionnaire (the inguinal pain questionnaire) between March 2013 and June 2014. The primary outcome was pain at follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1421 patients (84% males) answered the questionnaire (34% fibrin sealant, 66% tacks). The median follow-up was 35 months (range 12-62). Preoperative pain was associated with postoperative pain (p < 0.005), which was confirmed by multivariate analysis (OR 1.57 (CI 95% 1.40-1.77)). Furthermore, male gender was protective against postoperative pain (OR 0.47 (CI 95% 0.29-0.74)). A total of 18% in the fibrin sealant group and 20% in the tacks group reported pain during the past week at follow-up, and 6 and 7% reported pain not possible to ignore (p = 0.44). No difference was found between the fixation methods regarding getting up from a chair, sitting, or standing for more than 30 min, walking up stairs, driving a car, doing exercise, or the need for postoperative analgesics or postoperative sick leave (all p > 0.20). CONCLUSION: Mesh fixation technique did not affect long-term persistent pain. A large number of patients reported persistent pain regardless of mesh fixation technique, which emphasizes the need for preoperative information. Preoperative pain was a risk factor for persistent pain, whereas male gender was protective.

Behavior of a new long-chain cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive used for mesh fixation in hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Synthetic tissue adhesives (TA) are sometimes used in hernia repair surgery. This study compares the use of a new, noncommercial, long-chain cyanoacrylate (n-octyl) TA and Ifabond for mesh fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In two implant models in the rabbit, expanded polytetrafluorethylene meshes were fixed to the parietal peritoneum using a TA or tacks (intraperitoneal model), or polypropylene meshes used to repair partial abdominal wall defects were fixed with a TA or sutures (extraperitoneal model). Animals were euthanized 14 or 90 d postsurgery and implant specimens were processed for microscopy (labeling of macrophages and apoptotic cells), peritoneal fluid and biomechanical strength testing. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) were determinated in peritoneal fluid. RESULTS: Mesothelial cell deposition on the intraperitoneal implants fixed using the new TA and Ifabond was adequate and similar IL-6 and TNF-α levels were detected in these implants. Intraperitoneal meshes fixed with tacks showed IL-6 overexpression. Three months after surgery, macrophage and apoptotic cell rates were higher for the intraperitoneal implants fixed with Ifabond versus the new TA or tacks. In the extraperitoneal model, reduced macrophage and cell damage responses were observed in the meshes fixed with sutures versus both TA. Tensile strengths were greater for the tacks versus TA in the intraperitoneal implants and similar for the sutures and TA in the extraperitoneal implants (90 d). CONCLUSIONS: Both TA showed a good cell response in both models. Their use in an intraperitoneal location resulted in reduced tensile strength compared with the tacks. However, strengths were comparable when extraperitoneal implants were fixed with these adhesives or sutures.

Efectividad de la acupuntura con tachuela en afectados por epicondilitis / Effectiveness of acupuncture with tacks in affected patients with epicondilytis

Se realizó una intervención terapéutica en 20 pacientes con epicondilitis, remitidos de la consulta de Ortopedia al Departamento de Medicina Natural Tradicional del Hospital Provincial Docente Clinicoquirúrgico "Saturnino Lora Torres" de Santiago de Cuba, de septiembre a diciembre de 2012, con vistas a determinar la efectividad de la acupuntura con tachuela en ellos. Los afectados fueron valorados y, de forma aleatoria, se les distribuyó en 2 grupos de 10 integrantes cada uno: el de estudio, que recibió acupuntura (agujas de 0,2 mm) de forma permanente en los puntos Ashi y en el IG-11, y el de control, tratado convencionalmente con antiinflamatorios y analgésicos. Luego de aplicadas las terapias, los pacientes fueron valorados a los 5, 10 y 15 días, teniendo en cuenta el cuadro clínico dado por dolor, inflamación e impotencia funcional. La regresión de los síntomas se evaluó por la escala visual analógica, y se obtuvo una efectividad marcada del tratamiento con acupuntura en relación con el medicamentoso.

A therapeutic intervention in 20 patients with epicondilytis, transferred from the Orthopedics Department to the Traditional Natural Medicine Department from "Saturnino Lora Torres" Teaching Clinical Surgical Provincial Hospital in Santiago de Cuba was carried out from September to December of 2012, aimed at determining the effectiveness of the acupuncture with tacks in them. Those affected were evaluated and, were randomly distributed into 2 groups of 10 members each: the study group which received acupuncture (needles of 0.2 mm) in a permanent way in the points Ashi and in the IG-11, and the control group, conventionally treated with anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs. After the therapies were applied, patients were evaluated after 5, 10 and 15 days, keeping in mind the clinical pattern manifested by pain, inflammation and functional impotence. The regression of the symptoms was evaluated by the analogical visual scale, and a marked effectiveness of the treatment was obtained with acupuncture in relation to the drug treatment.