Uncontrolled Donation Potential After Circulatory Death in Slovenia Could Lead to More Organ Donations: Extrapolation of SiOHCA Study Data.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is one of the major health challenges faced by developed countries. Donation after circulatory death is a process of retrieving organs from individuals whose death has been confirmed by circulatory or respiratory criteria. In 2018, 136 625 people were listed on the waitlist covering over 16 countries. Out of these 136 625 individuals, 7383 died whilst waiting that year. The aim of this study is to assess the potential for the uncontrolled donation after circulatory death among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Slovenia. This non-interventional study was conducted using the Slovenian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry dataset. The database measured Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Slovenia between September and November 2022. From the database we chose patients who would be identified as donors by the uncontrolled donation after circulatory death guidelines for patient selection. Using the selection criteria we have narrowed the used data set from 294 unique patient records to 19. There were no organ donors in the cohort. With extrapolation we calculated that in 2022 there could be 111 donors in Slovenia that would fit the uncontrolled donation after circulatory death criteria. This equates to 52.4 pmp/y. We conclude that uncontrolled donation after circulatory death program in Slovenia would positively impact patients. Although our study is limited by a small sample of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients and short duration of the Slovenian out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry inclusion, the results offer a good foundation to further explore uncontrolled organ donation in Slovenia and similar countries.

Impact of the life-sustaining treatment decision act on organ donation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in South Korea: a multi-centre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The demand for organ transplants, both globally and in South Korea, substantially exceeds the supply, a situation that might have been aggravated by the enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision Act (LSTDA) in February 2018. This legislation may influence emergency medical procedures and the availability of organs from brain-dead donors. This study aimed to assess LSTDA's impact, introduced in February 2018, on organ donation status in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in a metropolitan city and identified related factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a regional cardiac arrest registry. This study included patients aged 16 or older with cardiac arrest and a cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 5 from January 2015 to December 2022. The exclusion criteria were CPC scores of 1-4, patients under 16 years, and patients declared dead or transferred from emergency departments. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse factors affecting organ donation. RESULTS: Of the 751 patients included in this study, 47 were organ donors, with a median age of 47 years. Before the LSTDA, there were 30 organ donations, which declined to 17 after its implementation. In the organ donation group, the causes of cardiac arrest included medical (34%), hanging (46.8%), and trauma (19.2%). The adjusted odds ratio for organ donation before the LSTDA implementation was 6.12 (95% CI 3.09-12.12), with non-medical aetiology as associated factors. CONCLUSION: The enactment of the LSTDA in 2018 in South Korea may be linked to reduced organ donations among patients with OHCA, underscoring the need to re-evaluate the medical and legal aspects of organ donation, especially considering end-of-life care decisions.

Prediction of Donor Heart Acceptance for Transplant and Its Clinical Implications: Results From The Donor Heart Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite a shortage of potential donors for heart transplant in the United States, most potential donor hearts are discarded. We evaluated predictors of donor heart acceptance in the United States and applied machine learning methods to improve prediction. METHODS: We included a nationwide (2005-2020) cohort of potential heart donors in the United States (n=73 948) from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and a more recent (2015-2020) rigorously phenotyped cohort of potential donors from DHS (Donor Heart Study; n=4130). We identified predictors of acceptance for heart transplant in both cohorts using multivariate logistic regression, incorporating time-interaction terms to characterize their varying effects over time. We fit models predicting acceptance for transplant in a 50% training subset of DHS using logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and random forest algorithms and compared their performance in the remaining 50% (test) of the subset. RESULTS: Predictors of donor heart acceptance were similar in the nationwide and DHS cohorts. Among these, older age (P value for time interaction, 0.0001) has become increasingly predictive of discard over time while other factors, including those related to drug use, infection, and mild cardiac diagnostic abnormalities, have become less influential (P value for time interaction, <0.05 for all). A random forest model (area under the curve, 0.908; accuracy, 0.831) outperformed other prediction algorithms in the test subset and was used as the basis of a novel web-based prediction tool. CONCLUSIONS: Predictors of donor heart acceptance for transplantation have changed significantly over the last 2 decades, likely reflecting evolving evidence regarding their impact on posttransplant outcomes. Real-time prediction of donor heart acceptance, using our web-based tool, may improve efficiency during donor management and heart allocation.

Education in the National Transplant Law as an ethical pathway for the construction of the health care value in Colombia / La enseñanza de la Ley Nacional de Trasplante como camino ético para la construcción del valor de la atención en salud en Colombia.

The national transplant law in Colombia, Law 1805 of 2016, modified the Colombian legislation regarding how a person accesses an organ transplant, but above all, it changed the donor figure, establishing the term derived from the presumptive consent right. This term implies a person's hypothetical willingness to be an organ donor as a manifestation of solidarity and charity towards another person in a situation of need and vulnerability concerning his/her health and the dimensions that define it. In the following text, seven moments are considered fundamental facts when constructing a culture about the value of healthcare in the national transplant policy in Colombia.

La Ley Nacional de Trasplantes en Colombia, Ley 1805 de 2016, modificó la legislación colombiana en cuanto a cómo se accede a un trasplante de órganos, pero, sobre todo, cambió la figura de donatario y dispuso el término derivado del derecho del consentimiento presuntivo. Este define la hipotética voluntad de una persona de ser donante de órganos como manifestación de solidaridad y beneficencia con otra persona en situación de necesidad y vulnerabilidad relacionada con su salud y las dimensiones que la definen. En el siguiente texto se presentan siete momentos que se consideran hechos fundamentales en la construcción de una cultura del valor de la atención en salud en la política nacional de trasplantes de Colombia.

La enseñanza de la Ley Nacional de Trasplante como camino ético para la construcción del valor de la atención en salud en Colombia / Education in the National Transplant Law as an ethical pathway for the construction of the health care value in Colombia

Resumen La Ley Nacional de Trasplantes en Colombia, Ley 1805 de 2016, modificó la legislación colombiana en cuanto a cómo se accede a un trasplante de órganos, pero, sobre todo, cambió la figura de donatario y dispuso el término derivado del derecho del consentimiento presuntivo. Este define la hipotética voluntad de una persona de ser donante de órganos como manifestación de solidaridad y beneficencia con otra persona en situación de necesidad y vulnerabilidad relacionada con su salud y las dimensiones que la definen. En el siguiente texto se presentan siete momentos que se consideran hechos fundamentales en la construcción de una cultura del valor de la atención en salud en la política nacional de trasplantes de Colombia.

Abstract The national transplant law in Colombia, Law 1805 of 2016, modified the Colombian legislation regarding how a person accesses an organ transplant, but above all, it changed the donor figure, establishing the term derived from the presumptive consent right. This term implies a person's hypothetical willingness to be an organ donor as a manifestation of solidarity and charity towards another person in a situation of need and vulnerability concerning his/her health and the dimensions that define it. In the following text, seven moments are considered fundamental facts when constructing a culture about the value of healthcare in the national transplant policy in Colombia.

Assessing the Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination Process in Korea: Insights from 10-Year Noncompleted Donation Data.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to analyze the current status of brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) determination in Korea over a decade, identifying key areas for improvement in the process. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from the Korea Organ Donation Agency spanning 2011 to 2021, focusing on donors whose donations were not completed. The study reviewed demographics, medical settings, diagnoses, and outcomes, with particular emphasis on cases classified as nonbrain death and those resulting in death by cardiac arrest during the BD/DNC assessment. RESULTS: Of the 5047 patients evaluated for potential brain death from 2011 to 2021, 361 were identified as noncompleted donors. The primary reasons for noncompletion included nonbrain death (n = 68, 18.8%), cardiac arrests during the BD/DNC assessment process (n = 80, 22.2%), organ ineligibility (n = 151, 41.8%), and logistical and legal challenges (n = 62, 17.2%). Notably, 25 (36.8%) of them failed to meet the minimum clinical criteria, and 7 of them were potential cases of disagreement between the two clinical examinations. Additionally, most cardiac arrests (n = 44, 55.0%) occurred between the first and second examinations, indicating management challenges in critically ill patients during the assessment period. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights significant challenges in the BD/DNC determination process, including the need for improved consistency in neurologic examinations and the management of critically ill patients. The study underscores the importance of refining protocols and training to enhance the accuracy and reliability of brain death assessments, while also ensuring streamlined and effective organ donation practices.

The best option argument and kidney sales: a reply to Albertsen.

In a recent article, Albertsen both elaborates the best option argument for regulated markets and levels a justice-based objection to kidney sales. In the present article, I show that Albertsen has crucially misunderstood the best option argument. It is not a defence of kidney sales, as Albertsen claims. It is a reply to an objection. The objection, perennial in the debate, opposes kidney sales on the grounds that sellers would be harmed. The best option argument-proving that prohibitions tend to set back the interests of those denied their preferred option-shows this thinking to be confused. If sound, the best option argument dramatically undercuts any attempt to oppose a market citing would-be sellers' interests.

Pass the tissue: restoring researcher access to legal human donations.

The sensitivity of human tissue and previous instances of misuse have, rightfully, led to the introduction of far-reaching oversight and regulatory mechanisms for accessing, storing and sharing samples. However, these restrictions, in tandem with more broad-based privacy regulations, have had the unintended consequence of obstructing legitimate requests for medical materials. This is of real detriment to ambitions for biomedical research, most notably the precision medicine agenda. As such, this paper makes the case for facilitating authorised researcher access to human tissue and associated data along practical medical ethics lines, detailing how liberating samples from unfit regulations, re-evaluating biobanks, diversifying considerations for donor benefit-risk, future proofing donor consent and flattening hierarchies of donation acceptability equate to a more cohesive and respectful means of managing biological samples and information than is achieved at present.

Organ donation after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on organ donation practices and recipient outcomes, particularly when comparing donors who experienced cardiac arrest and received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) followed by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decannulation, versus those who experienced cardiac arrest without receiving ECPR. This study aims to explore organ donation practices and outcomes post-ECPR to enhance our understanding of the donation potential after cardiac arrest. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from the Japan Organ Transplant Network database, covering all deceased organ donors between July 17, 2010, and August 31, 2022. We included donors who experienced at least one episode of cardiac arrest. During the study period, patients undergoing ECMO treatment were not eligible for a legal diagnosis of brain death. We compared the timeframes associated with each donor's management and the long-term graft outcomes of recipients between ECPR and non-ECPR groups. RESULTS: Among 370 brain death donors with an episode of cardiac arrest, 26 (7.0%) received ECPR and 344 (93.0%) did not; the majority were due to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. The median duration of veno-arterial ECMO support after ECPR was 3 days. Patients in the ECPR group had significantly longer intervals from admission to organ procurement compared to those not receiving ECPR (13 vs. 9 days, P = 0.005). Lung graft survival rates were significantly lower in the ECPR group (log-rank test P = 0.009), with no significant differences in other organ graft survival rates. Of 160 circulatory death donors with an episode of cardiac arrest, 27 (16.9%) received ECPR and 133 (83.1%) did not. Time intervals from admission to organ procurement following circulatory death and graft survival showed no significant differences between ECPR and non-ECPR groups. The number of organs donated was similar between the ECPR and non-ECPR groups, regardless of brain or circulatory death. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study reveals that lung graft survival was lower in recipients from ECPR-treated donors, highlighting the need for targeted research and protocol adjustments in post-ECPR organ donation.

Unjust organ markets and why it is irrelevant that selling a kidney is the best option.

An important argument against prohibiting organ sales is that it removes the best option available to individuals in dire circumstances. However, this line of reasoning fails to recognise that selling a kidney on a regulated market is only the best option in a very narrow comparison, where a regulated organ market is compared with banning organ sales. Once we acknowledge this narrowness, selling a kidney is not the best option. This paves the way for a distributive justice-based critique of the 'best option' argument for organ markets, which illuminates that organ markets should be compared with a broader set of alternatives. If providing the option of selling a kidney is not the best option, but rather the best option we are willing to provide, and one which means that many people will remain in poverty and unjust circumstances, then this reflects poorly on those societies willing to offer only this option and not a better one.

Validação do potencial doador de órgãos e tecidos durante a pandemia covid-19: uma narrativa gráfica / Validation of potential organ and tissue donors during the covid-19 pandemic: a graphic narrative / Validación de posibles donantes de órganos y tejidos durante la pandemia de covid-19: una narrativa gráfica

Objetivo: Construir e validar uma narrativa gráfica acerca dos cuidados para validação do potencial doador de órgãos e tecidos durante a pandemia da covid-19. Métodos: Estudo metodológico, construído por Design Instrucional Contextualizado e validado pela técnica Delphi. A primeira etapa foi a construção da narrativa considerando pressupostos de cuidados desenvolvidos em 2020 para validação dos potenciais doadores durante a pandemia. A segunda etapa compreendeu a validação de conteúdo junto a profissionais com expertise na temática e integrantes da Comissão Intra-hospitalar para Doação de Órgãos e Tecidos. Resultados: A narrativa é apresentada por meio da interação entre duas enfermeiras contendo seis tópicos principais: investigação da transmissão comunitária, investigação de situações clínicas, cuidados com o ambiente, rastreamento de sinais e sintomas, desenvolvimento do exame físico e cuidados com a equipe de saúde. Participaram da validação de conteúdo nove experts e o Índice de Validação de Conteúdo mínimo foi de 0,88 e máximo de 1,0. Conclusão: A narrativa traz informações claras e simples quanto aos cuidados desenvolvidos pelos profissionais na validação do potencial doador. O material demonstra as etapas a serem seguidas para assegurar qualidade e segurança nesse processo relevante para disseminação do conhecimento acerca da validação do potencial doador. (AU)

Objective: To build and validate a graphic narrative about the care to validate the potential organ and tissue donor during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Methodological study, built by Contextualized Instructional Design and validated by the Delphi technique. The first step was to build the narrative considering care assumptions developed in 2020 to validate potential donors during the pandemic. The second stage involved the validation of content with professionals with expertise in the subject and members of the Intra-hospital Committee for Organ and Tissue Donation. Results: The narrative is presented through the interaction between two nurses containing six main topics: investigation of community transmission, investigation of clinical situations, care for the environment, tracking of signs and symptoms, development of the physical examination and care for the health team. Nine experts participated in the content validation and the minimum Content Validation Index was 0.88 and maximum 1.0. Conclusion: The narrative provides clear and simple information about the care provided by professionals in validating the potential donor. The material demonstrates the steps to be followed to ensure quality and safety in this process relevant to the dissemination of knowledge about the validation of the potential donor. (AU)

Objetivo: Construir y validar una narrativa gráfica sobre la atención para validar al potencial donante de órganos y tejidos durante la pandemia de covid-19. Métodos: Estudio metodológico, construido por Diseño Instruccional Contextualizado y validado por la técnica Delphi. El primer paso fue construir la narrativa considerando los supuestos de atención desarrollados en 2020 para validar a los donantes potenciales durante la pandemia. La segunda etapa implicó la validación de contenidos con profesionales con experiencia en el tema y miembros del Comité Intra-hospitalario de Donación de Órganos y Tejidos. Resultados: La narrativa se presenta a través de la interacción entre dos enfermeras conteniendo seis temas principales: investigación de la transmisión comunitaria, investigación de situaciones clínicas, cuidado del medio ambiente, seguimiento de signos y síntomas, desarrollo de la exploración física y atención al equipo de salud. Nueve expertos participaron en la validación de contenido y el índice de validación de contenido mínimo fue 0,88 y máximo 1,0. Conclusion: La narrativa brinda información clara y sencilla sobre la atención brindada por los profesionales en la validación del potencial donante. El material demuestra los pasos a seguir para garantizar la calidad y seguridad en este proceso relevante para la difusión del conocimiento sobre la validación del potencial donante. (AU)

The right to know from the opt-out effectiveness system perspective in organ transplantation cases.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: This article examines the legal challenges associated with opt-out and opt-in systems in transplantation cases. It focuses on the low public knowledge and awareness of the national transplantation system, assessing its compliance with international prerequisites for an opt-out system. The analysis centres on the "right to know" perspective and the effectiveness of opt-out in organ transplantation. . PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The research methodology includes scientific principles, public surveys, relevant regulations from the Republic of Latvia and EU, and grey literature on the health system and organ donation in the EU. Scientific articles from databases such as Scopus and WOS were selected based on criteria such as language (English and Latvian) and focus on living wills and comparisons of organ donation systems. Previous EU and national studies, reports, and court judgments were used to analyse data on opt-in and opt-out transplantation systems and policy efficiency in organ transplantation. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Individuals' right to autonomy over their bodies extends even after death, encompassing the right to integrity. Organ donation, being a deeply personal choice reflecting one's values and beliefs, plays a crucial role in saving lives through transplantation. To enhance cooperation and donation rates, international regulations stress the significance of public awareness regarding organ and tissue transplantation. Unfortunately, inadequate compliance by authorities and low awareness pose ethical and legal dilemmas, potentially violating constitutional rights. Reports highlight limited public understanding of transplantation systems, raising concerns, particularly in opt-out systems. National governments bear the responsibility of safeguarding these rights and addressing challenges beyond legal means, thus establishing a more ethical organ donation system that upholds voluntariness, generosity, and individual autonomy.

High-Functioning Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant System Characteristics: The British Columbia Experience With an Opt-In System.

Rationale & Objective: A high level of cooperation between organ procurement organizations and transplant programs may help maximize use of deceased donor kidneys. The practices that are essential for a high functioning organ donation and transplant system remain uncertain. We sought to report metrics of organ donation and transplant performance in British Columbia, Canada, and to assess the association of specific policies and practices that contribute to the system's performance. Study Design: A retrospective observational study. Setting & Participants: Referred deceased organ donors in British Columbia were used in the study from January 1, 2016, to December 31 2019. Exposures: Provincial, organ procurement organization, and center level policies were implemented to improve donor referral and organ utilization. Outcomes: Assessment of donor and kidney utilization along steps of the critical pathway for organ donation. Analytical Approach: Deceased donors were classified according to the critical pathway for organ donation and key donation and transplant metrics were identified. Results: There were 1,948 possible donors referred. Of 1,948, 754 (39%) were potential donors. Of 754 potential donors, 587 (78%) were consented donors. Of 587 consented donors, 480 (82%) were eligible kidney donors. Of 480 eligible kidney donors, 438 (91%) were actual kidney donors. And of 438 actual kidney donors, 432 (99%) were utilized kidney donors. One-year all-cause allograft survival was 95%. Practices implemented to improve the system's performance included hospital donor coordinators, early communication between the organ procurement organization and transplant nephrologists, dedicated organ recovery and implant surgeons, aged-based kidney allocation, and hospital admission of recipients before kidney recovery. Limitations: Assignment of causality between individual policies and practices and organ donation and utilization is limited in this observational study. Conclusions: In British Columbia, consent for donation, utilization of donated kidneys, and transplant survival are exceptionally high, suggesting the importance of an integrated deceased donor and kidney transplant service.

Optimization of all possible opportunities for deceased donor kidney donation and transplantation is essential to meet the need for transplantation. We examined the performance of organ procurement and transplant in a deceased organ donor system in British Columbia, Canada, and reviewed policies and practices that may contribute to the system's performance. We found a high level of donation, transplantation, and survival of donated kidneys and identified policies and practices that likely contribute to the system's performance.

Left lobe living donor liver transplantation using the resection and partial liver segment 2-3 transplantation with delayed total hepatectomy (RAPID) procedure in cirrhotic patients: First case report in Korea.

In liver transplantation, the primary concern is to ensure an adequate future liver remnant (FLR) volume for the donor, while selecting a graft of sufficient size for the recipient. The living donor-resection and partial liver segment 2-3 transplantation with delayed total hepatectomy (LD-RAPID) procedure offers a potential solution to expand the donor pool for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We report the first case involving a cirrhotic patient with autoimmune hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma, who underwent left lobe LDLT using the LD-RAPID procedure. The living liver donor (LLD) underwent a laparoscopic left hepatectomy, including middle hepatic vein. The resection on the recipient side was an extended left hepatectomy, including the middle hepatic vein orifice and caudate lobe. At postoperative day 7, a computed tomography scan showed hypertrophy of the left graft from 320 g to 465 mL (i.e., a 45.3% increase in graft volume body weight ratio from 0.60% to 0.77%). After a 7-day interval, the diseased right lobe was removed in the second stage surgery. The LD-RAPID procedure using left lobe graft allows for the use of a small liver graft or small FLR volume in LLD in LDLT, which expands the donor pool to minimize the risk to LLD by enabling the donation of a smaller liver portion.

Critical pathway for deceased donors: An analysis in three regions of Colombia / Ruta crítica de donantes fallecidos: un análisis de tres regiones en Colombia

Introduction. The critical pathway for deceased donation offers a methodical framework for guiding the donation process. It not only serves to assess performance but also to identify areas of potential improvement. Therefore, the identification and selection of potential organ donors (POD) is a key process. This study aims to describe the critical pathway for deceased donation in a cohort of POD in three regions (CRT1, CRT2, and CRT5) of Colombia. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed data of POD assessed from January 2022 to December 2022. General characteristics of POD, diagnosis, contraindication causes, and organ procurement were described. Analysis was conducted using the Chi-squared test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables. Results. Within the cohort of 1451 assessed POD, 441 (30.3%) were diagnosed with brain death. Among potential donors after brain death, 198 (44.9%) were eligible donors (medically suitable). Of these, 157 donors (79.3%) became actual donors (undergoing operative incision for organ recovery), with 147 (93,6 %) having at least one organ recovered (actual donors with organ recovery). Ultimately, 411 utilized organs were utilized. Additionally, there were observed differences in the characteristics of donors from different regions. Conclusion. This study reports the critical pathway for deceased donation in a cohort of POD in three regions of Colombia. This provides useful information and helps to gain insight and understanding into the process of organ donation and organ procurement in order to take actions that could improve the donation rates.

Introducción. La ruta crítica de donantes fallecidos permite un enfoque sistemático para la donación de riñón, y, proporciona una herramienta para evaluar el rendimiento de áreas de mejora potencial. La selección de posibles donantes de órganos (PDO) es un proceso clave. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir la ruta crítica para la donación de fallecidos en una cohorte de PDO en tres regiones de Colombia. Métodos. Estudio retrospectivo de PDO evaluados durante 2022. Se describieron las características generales de los PDO, el diagnóstico y las causas de contraindicación. El análisis se llevó a cabo utilizando la prueba de Chi-cuadrado para las variables categóricas y la prueba de Mann-Whitney para las variables cuantitativas. Resultados. Entre los 1451 POD evaluados, 441 (30,3 %) fueron diagnosticados con muerte cerebral. De los posibles donantes después de la muerte cerebral, 198 (44,9 %) fueron donantes elegibles (adecuados desde el punto de vista médico). Entre ellos, 157 donantes (79,3 %) fueron donantes reales (en quienes se realizó una incisión operatoria con la intención de recuperar órganos) y 147 (93,6 %) tuvieron al menos un órgano recuperado (donantes reales con recuperación de órganos). Finalmente, se identificaron 411 órganos utilizados. Conclusión. Este estudio reporta la ruta crítica para la donación de fallecidos en una cohorte de POD en tres regiones de Colombia. Esto proporciona información útil, ayuda a obtener conocimientos y comprender el proceso de donación y obtención de órganos, para tomar medidas que puedan mejorar las tasas de donación.

Understanding the dynamics of deceased organ donation and utilization in Colombia.

Objective: To obtain a comprehensive overview of organ donation, organ utilization, and discard in the entire donation process in Colombia. Methods: A retrospective study of 1 451 possible donors, distributed in three regions of Colombia, evaluated in 2022. The general characteristics, diagnosis, and causes of contraindication for potential donors were described. Results: Among the 1 451 possible donors, 441 (30.4%) fulfilled brain death criteria, constituting the potential donor pool. Families consented to organ donation in 141 medically suitable cases, while 60 instances utilized legal presumption, leading to 201 eligible donors (13.9%). Of those, 160 (11.0%) were actual donors (in whom operative incision was made with the intent of organ recovery or who had at least one organ recovered). Finally, we identified 147 utilized donors (10.1%) (from whom at least one organ was transplanted). Statistically significant differences were found between age, sex, diagnosis of brain death, and donor critical pathway between regions. A total of 411 organs were transplanted from 147 utilized donors, with kidneys being the most frequently procured and transplanted organs, accounting for 280 (68.1%) of the total. This was followed by 85 livers (20.7%), 31 hearts (7.5%), 14 lungs (3.4%), and 1 pancreas (0.2%). The discard rate of procured deceased donors was 8.1%. Conclusions: About one-tenth of donors are effectively used for transplantation purposes. Our findings highlight areas of success and challenges, providing a basis for future improvements in Colombia.

Single center utilization and post-transplant outcomes of thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion deceased cardiac donor organs.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (TA-NRP) following cardiac death is an emerging multivisceral organ procurement technique. Recent national studies on outcomes of presumptive TA-NRP-procured organs are limited by potential misclassification since TA-NRP is not differentiated from donation after cardiac death (DCD) in registry data. METHODS: We studied 22 donors whose designees consented to TA-NRP and organ procurement performed at our institution between January 20, 2020 and July 3, 2022. We identified these donors in SRTR to describe organ utilization and recipient outcomes and compared them to recipients of traditional DCD (tDCD) and donation after brain death (DBD) organs during the same timeframe. RESULTS: All 22 donors progressed to cardiac arrest and underwent TA-NRP followed by heart, lung, kidney, and/or liver procurement. Median donor age was 41 years, 55% had anoxic brain injury, 45% were hypertensive, 0% were diabetic, and median kidney donor profile index was 40%. TA-NRP utilization was high across all organ types (88%-100%), with a higher percentage of kidneys procured via TA-NRP compared to tDCD (88% vs. 72%, p = .02). Recipient and graft survival ranged from 89% to 100% and were comparable to tDCD and DBD recipients (p ≥ .2). Delayed graft function was lower for kidneys procured from TA-NRP compared to tDCD donors (27% vs. 44%, p = .045). CONCLUSION: Procurement from TA-NRP donors yielded high organ utilization, with outcomes comparable to tDCD and DBD recipients across organ types. Further large-scale study of TA-NRP donors, facilitated by its capture in the national registry, will be critical to fully understand its impact as an organ procurement technique.