RESUMO
The authors hereby present a case of a calcified schwannoma of the hypoglossal nerve, which led to hypoglossal nerve palsy initially misinterpreted as a tongue tumor. This paper reviews the presentation of schwannoma of the hypoglossal nerve and offers a novel perspective on this rare condition. Diagnostic pitfalls and the diagnostic-therapeutic value are also discussed.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to dosimetrically compare interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) and modern external beam radiotherapy modalities, as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and stereotactic radiotherapy with Cyberknife (CK) of tumours of the tongue and floor of the mouth in terms of dose to the critical organs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, between March 2013 and August 2022 twenty patients (11 male/9 female) with stage T1-3N0M0 tongue (n = 14) and floor of mouth (n = 6) tumours received postoperative radiotherapy because of close/positive surgical margin and/or lymphovascular and/or perineural invasion. High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy applying flexible plastic catheters with a total dose of 15 × 3 Gy was used for treatment. In addition to BT plans VMAT and stereotactic CK plans were also made in all cases, using the same fractionation scheme and dose prescription. As for the organs at risk, the doses to the mandible, the ipsilateral and the contralateral salivary glands were compared. RESULTS: The mean volume of the planning target volume (PTV) was 12.5 cm3, 26.5 cm3 and 17.5 cm3 in BT, VMAT and CK techniques, respectively, due to different safety margin protocols. The dose to the mandible was the most favourable with BT, as for the salivary glands (parotid and submandibular) the CK technique resulted in the lowest dose. The highest dose to the critical organs was observed with the VMAT technique. The mean values of D2cm3 and D0.1cm3 for the critical organs were as follows for BT, VMAT and CK plans: 47.4% and 73.9%, 92.2% and 101.8%, 68.4% and 92.3% for the mandible, 4.8% and 6.7%, 7.3% and 13.8%, 2.3% and 5.1% for the ipsilateral parotid gland, 3.5% and 4.9%, 6.8% and 10.9%, 1.5% and 3.3% for the contralateral parotid gland, 7.3% and 9.4%, 9.0% and 14.3%, 3.6% and 5.6% for the contralateral submandibular gland. CONCLUSIONS: The present results confirm that BT, despite being an invasive technique, is dosimetrically clearly beneficial in the treatment of oral cavity tumours and is a modality worth considering when applying radiotherapy, not only as definitive treatment, but also postoperatively. The use of the CK in the head and neck region requires further investigation.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias Bucais , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Braquiterapia/métodos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Órgãos em Risco , Neoplasias Bucais/radioterapia , Neoplasias Bucais/cirurgia , LínguaRESUMO
Whilst rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the third most common solid tumour in children, congenital RMS of the tongue is extremely rare and usually present as painless progressive mass since birth (Dagher and Helman in Oncologist 4:34-44, 1999; Childs and Goudy in Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 5:126-128, 2010). In neonates, presentation with respiratory distress is unexpected as neonates are preferential nasal breathers and restricted oral breathing due to tumour usually poses no problem. We herein report a case of rhabdomyosarcoma of the tongue with co-existent unilateral choanal atresia, presenting with respiratory distress. The baby developed upper respiratory tract infection following which developed severe respiratory distress. Airway symptoms were precipitated as there was combined obstruction of both the nostrils due to infection or adenoid enlargement and unilateral chonal atresia. Treatment of respiratory distress in the presence of RMS and bilateral nasal pathology must first prioritise the security of the airway, before taking a multi-factorial approach to the therapy of the lingual mass (Childs and Goudy in Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 5:126-128, 2010). This case illustrates the importance of vigilance with respect to co-existent nasal pathology, in order to avoid the occurrence of complete airway obstruction. We therefore feel that any diagnosis of lingual RMS should warrant a formal examination of both nasal cavities.