Total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy without retrograde insertion of a ureteral catheter for the treatment of kidney stone patients without hydronephrosis: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) without retrograde insertion of a ureteral catheter for the treatment of kidney stone patients without hydronephrosis. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled study at a tertiary care medical center was conducted from August 2019 to April 2023. Kidney stone patients diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) without significant hydronephrosis were randomly assigned to two groups: total tubeless PCNL without retrograde insertion of a ureteral catheter (group 1) and traditional PCNL (group 2). The primary endpoint was postoperative complications, while the secondary endpoints included the stone-free rate (SFR), operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay, and medical costs. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were recruited, including 50 patients in group 1 and 49 patients in group 2. There were no significant differences in postoperative complications and SFR between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, relative to group 2, patients in group 1 had significantly shorter operative time (58.5 ± 25.39 min vs. 82.98 ± 26.02 min, P < 0.001) and length of postoperative hospital stay (1.98 ± 1.72 days vs. 4.39 ± 2.95 days, P < 0.001), as well as significantly lower medical costs (3190.30 ± 590.58 dollars vs. 3552.78 ± 967.79 dollars, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Total tubeless PCNL without retrograde insertion of a ureteral catheter for the treatment of kidney stone patients without hydronephrosis is safe and effective for urologists with extensive experience in PCNL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: chictr.org.cn identifier, ChiCTR2000040884, date of registration: 13/12/2020, retrospectively registered.

Comparison of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy and total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, safety and advantages of the total tubeless (TT) percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and standard PCNL in the supine position. METHODS: This study was carried out at Izmir Tepecik Health Application and Research Center. A total of 87 patients were examined. Forty-three patients who underwent TT procedure were defined as Group 1, and 44 patients who underwent standard procedure with a nephrostomy tube were defined as Group 2. Two techniques were evaluated with demographic data and outcome parameters. Univariate regression analyses were performed in these data sets for the parameters that predicted the TT procedure. RESULTS: The demographic data of the groups and all characteristics of the stones were similar. When the results were examined, the stone-free rates detected by non-contrast computed tomography (CT) in the postoperative 1st month were similar between the groups. Complication rates and secondary intervention rates were similar. Operation and fluoroscopy times were shorter in group 1, which were not statistically significant. Postoperative hemoglobin decreased, and creatinine values were similar. In Group 1, mean postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores and the percentage of VAS reporting > 5 points for pain level measurement were lower and statistically significant. In the univariate analysis of the factors predicting the TT procedure, no significant results were found in any parameter. CONCLUSION: Performing TT PCNL in the supine position in selected patients reduces postoperative pain without affecting the complication rates as in prone PCNL. Our study is the first to compare TT and standard PCNL in supine position.

Total tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis.

To compare the safety and efficacy of total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with standard PCNL for the treatment of upper urinary calculi. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and ScienceDirect were searched for collecting related literature on the two procedures. All compared studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCT), cohort studies (CS) and case-control studies (CCS), were included. Totally, 14 studies were included. Pooled data demonstrated that patients who underwent total tubeless PCNL were associated with significantly shorter operation time [weighted mean difference (WMD): -3.41, P = 0.004], shorter hospital stay (WMD: -1.54, P < 0.00001). It seemed that significantly less postoperative analgesic requirement could be found in the total tubeless PCNL group according to subgroup analysis. However, no significant differences could be found between the two groups in stone-free rate [risk ratio (RR): 1.03, P = 0.26], hemoglobin drop (WMD: -0.03, P = 0.85), and rates of postoperative fever (RR: 0.53, P = 0.11) and transfusion (RR: 0.79, P = 0.41). Sensitivity analysis after excluding CCS revealed results similar to previous findings. Total tubeless PCNL would be superior to standard PCNL in reducing operation time, hospital stay and postoperative analgesic requirement without significantly more adverse events.