RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a revolutionary procedure for severe aortic stenosis. The coexistence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and TAVR introduces a challenge that significantly impacts patient outcomes. AIM: To define readmission rates, predictors, and causes after TAVR procedure in CKD stage 1-4 patients. METHODS: We used the national readmission database 2018 and 2020 to look into readmission rates, causes and predictors after TAVR procedure in patients with CKD stage 1-4. RESULTS: Out of 24758 who underwent TAVR and had CKD, 7892 (32.4%) patients were readmitted within 90 days, and had higher adjusted odds of being females (adjusted odds ratio: 1.17, 95%CI: 1.02-1.31, P = 0.02) with longer length of hospital stay > 6 days, and more comorbidities including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, anemia, and congestive heart failure (CHF). CONCLUSION: Most common causes of readmission included CHF (18.0%), sepsis, and complete atrioventricular block. Controlling readmission predictors with very close follow-up is warranted to prevent such high rate of readmission.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The outcome of Low Flow-Low Gradient (LF-LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients who underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) procedure is not well defined. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to compare the outcomes of TAVR in LF-LG AS patients to the more traditional high gradient (HG) aortic stenosis. METHODS: We comprehensively searched for controlled randomized and non-randomized studies from 4 online databases. We are presenting the data using risk ratios (95 % confidence intervals) and measuring heterogeneity using Higgins' I2 index. RESULTS: Our analysis included 4380 patients with 3425 HG patients and 955 LF-LG patients from 6 cohort (5 retrospective and 1 prospective) studies. When compared to LFLG; TAVR was associated with significantly lower 30 days mortality in HG patients (5.1 % vs 7.4 %; relative risk [RR]: 0.55; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.35 to 0.86; p < 0.01). Similar findings were also observed in 12-month cardiovascular (CV) mortality (5.5 % vs. 10.4 %; RR: 0.47; 95 % CI: 0.38 to 0.60; p < 0.01 and 12-month all-cause mortality (15.9 % vs 20.9 %; RR: 0.70; 95 % CI: 0.49 to 1.00; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in myocardial infarction (MI) after TAVR between HG and LF-LG at 30 days (0.16 % vs. 0.95 %; p < 0.09) or 12 months (0.43 % vs. 0.95 %; p = 0.20). Similarly, there was no difference in stroke rates at 30 days (2.9 % vs. 2.86 %) or at 12 months (3.6 % vs. 3.06 %). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patients with LF-LG severe AS who underwent TAVR had worse 1-year all-cause mortality, 30-day all-cause, and 1-year CV mortality when compared to TAVR in HG severe AS. There was no difference in MI or stroke rates. Therefore, with heart team discussion and informed patient decision regarding the risk and benefit, TAVR would still offer better outcomes in LFLG AS compared to conservative medical management.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) determined a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis but data on very long-term durability are lacking. We sought to evaluate the clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of the CoreValve porcine pericardial self-expanding bioprosthesis at 12-year follow-up. METHODS: 882 inoperable or high-risk patients were treated with the CoreValve bioprosthesis in 8 Italian high-volume centers between 2007 and 2011. The endpoints were 12-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and Cumulative Incidence Functions (CIFs) for severe Structural Valve Deterioration (SVD), Bioprosthetic Valve Dysfunction (BVD), Bioprosthetic Valve Failure (BVF), and severe Hemodynamic Valve Deterioration (HVD). VARC-3 definitions were applied. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics included a mean age of 83 ± 6 years, and NYHA class III or IV in 76.3 % of patients. The actuarial risk of death at 12 years after TAVR was 95.5 % (CI 93.5 %- 97.1 %). The actual risk of cardiovascular death, weighted against the risk of non-cardiac death at 12 years was 23.9 % (21.0 %-26.8 %). The 12-year actual risk of BVD was 7.0 % (5.3 %-8.9 %), of SVD was 3.6 % (2.5 %-5.2 %), of BVF was 3.12 % (2.02 %-4.57 %), and of severe HVD was 1.7 % (0.9 %-2.9 %). Mean transaortic gradient significantly decreased after the procedure (52 ± 15 mmHg vs 9 ± 5 mmHg, p < 0.001), and remained stable up to 12 years (12 ± 4 mmHg, P = 0.08 vs. discharge). CONCLUSIONS: The first-generation CoreValve bioprosthesis showed reassuring clinical and hemodynamic performance at 12-year follow-up.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for low-risk patients with symptomatic severe tricuspid aortic stenosis. However, bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients were included only in single-arm registries of pivotal low-risk TAVR trials, resulting in limited data for this subgroup. METHODS: The LRT (Low Risk TAVR) trial was an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter study and the first FDA-approved investigational device exemption trial to evaluate the feasibility of TAVR with balloon-expandable or self-expanding valves in low-risk patients with symptomatic severe BAV stenosis. This analysis reports 2-year follow-up, assessing the primary outcome of all-cause mortality and evaluating clinical outcomes. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2019, a total of 72 low-risk patients diagnosed with symptomatic, severe BAV stenosis underwent TAVR across six centers. Six patients were lost to follow-up. At 2-year follow-up, mortality was 1.5% (1 of 66 patients). Among the remaining 65 patients, four experienced nondisabling strokes (6.2%), while 2 (3.1%) developed infective endocarditis. No new permanent pacemakers were required beyond the 30-day follow-up, and no patients, including those with endocarditis, needed aortic valve re-intervention. At the 2-year echocardiography follow-up (n = 65), 27.8% of BAV patients showed mild aortic regurgitation, with none exhibiting moderate or severe regurgitation. The mean aortic gradient was 12.1 ± 4.1 mmHg, and the mean valve area was 1.7 ± 0.5 cm². CONCLUSION: The 2-year follow-up confirms commendable clinical outcomes of TAVR in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis, establishing its evident safety.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The coexistence of mitral regurgitation (MR) and severe aortic stenosis (AS) has been associated with worse outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Herein, the aim was to assess the etiology and degree of MR in an unselected TAVI population and investigate the impact of MR reduction at mid-term follow-up. METHODS: Patients subjected to TAVI as a treatment for severe AS in a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was the MR reduction after TAVI. The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization at a 3-year follow-up. RESULTS: Patients undergoing TAVI (n = 283) in the years 2017-2019 were screened for the presence of hemodynamically significant MR. Sixty-nine subjects (24.4%) with severe (16, 23.2%) and moderate (53, 76.8%) MR were included. The primary MR was predominant (39 subjects, 56.5%). The median age of the patients was 82 years. MR improved in 25 patients (36.2%, p < 0.001). Baseline severe MR was more prone to reduce (8 subjects, 50%) than moderate (17 subjects, 32.1%, p = 0.04). The primary MR improved in 14 patients (35.9%), while secondary in 11 patients (36.7%, p = 1). Patients showing MR reduction had lower mortality (8 vs. 29.55%, p = 0.047) and were less frequently hospitalized (20 vs. 45.45%, p = 0.03) at 3-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamically significant MR improves after TAVI regardless of its etiology. Moreover, MR reduction after TAVI is associated with better clinical outcomes.
RESUMO
Aortic stenosis has become the most prevalent valvular disease with increasing life expectancy and the ageing of the population, representing a significant clinical burden for health care providers. Its treatment has been revolutionized by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as a safe and minimally invasive option for elderly patients. Left ventricular (LV) functional measurement is of particular importance before TAVR, however, increased afterload significantly influences the conventional echocardiographic parameters. Non-invasive myocardial work examines myocardial deformation in the context of instantaneous LV pressure, thus, it might be a more reliable measure of LV function. Accordingly, we aimed to study non-invasive myocardial work and its relationship with functional outcome following TAVR.We enrolled 90 TAVR candidates (80 [75-84] years; 44% female). Using echocardiography, we quantified ejection fraction (EF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), global myocardial work index (GWI) and global constructive work (GCW) before and 12 months after the procedure. Serum NT-proBNP levels were also measured. EF did not change (52.6 ± 13.1 vs. 54.2 ± 10.5%; p = 0.199), while GLS increased (-13.5 ± 4.6 vs. -15.2 ± 3.8%; p < 0.001). GWI decreased (1913 ± 799 vs. 1654 ± 613 mmHg%; p < 0.001) and so did GCW (2365 ± 851 vs. 2177 ± 652 mmHg%; p = 0.018). History of atrial fibrillation (AF) (ß = 0.349) and preprocedural GCW (ß = -0.238) were independent predictors of postprocedural NT-proBNP (p < 0.001).GLS, GWI and GCW changed after TAVR while there was no alteration in EF. The preprocedural GCW and history of AF were independent predictors of postprocedural NT-proBNP. Accordingly, myocardial work indices may help patient selection and the prediction of the functional outcome in this population.
RESUMO
Background: The Navitor Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) study is a prospective, multicenter, global study assessing the safety and effectiveness of the Navitor valve in a population with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis who are at high and extreme surgical risk. The impact of pre-existing conduction abnormalities and implantation technique on new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) for the Navitor platform is not fully understood. Therefore, the goal of this analysis was to investigate the associations between patient and procedural factors and the 30-day new PPI rate. Methods: A total of 260 patients who underwent implantation of a Navitor valve in the Navitor IDE study were reviewed. Patients with preprocedural permanent pacemakers (n = 28) were excluded. Baseline risk factors were assessed for statistical significance. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of new PPI. Results: Mean age of the pacemaker-naïve population was 83.3 ± 5.2 years, 58.6% were female, average Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 3.8% ± 1.9%, median frailty score was 1 (interquartile range 1, 2), and 17.7% were deemed at extreme surgical risk. Pre-existing first-degree atrioventricular block and right bundle branch block significantly increased the risk of new PPI postimplantation, whereas left bundle branch block did not. Membranous septum length in relation to noncoronary cusp implant depth was a significant predictor of new PPI, with higher rates of new PPI observed when noncoronary cusp implant depth exceeded membranous septum length. Analysis of implant depth alone revealed deeper implants were associated with a higher rate of new PPI, regardless of patient baseline conduction abnormality. Conclusions: The 30-day rate of new PPI in the Navitor IDE study is associated with patient pre-existing baseline conduction disturbances and implantation depth.
RESUMO
Multivalvular heart disease (MVHD) is present in one-third of patients with valvular heart disease (VHD). Compared to single VHD patients, these patients have a more significant hemodynamic impact and are often left under medical treatment. Most importantly, when undergoing multiple valve interventions, they show worse rates of heart failure and mortality. The guidelines-supported interventions in patients with MVHD in combined aortic regurgitation and mitral stenosis include percutaneous mitral balloon commissurotomy, open mitral commissurotomy, or surgical mitral valve replacement followed by transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement, trying to minimize the increased mortality risk of double-valve replacement. Simultaneous transcatheter valve replacement (STVR) for native MVHD is still off-label and not yet considered in clinical guidelines since the evidence of its results is limited to a few cases reported worldwide. However, fully percutaneous transfemoral STVR seems promising for MVHD patients thanks to its minimal invasiveness, the continuous improvement of the transcatheter heart valve devices, the likely shorter length of stay and the fastest recovery. To our knowledge, this is the first case ever reported of fully percutaneous STVR for native MVHD in aortic regurgitation and mitral stenosis. Deep understanding of both pathologies and their interactions, not only from a pathological point of view but from the procedural planning and procedural steps point of view is mandatory. Hereby we present the specific STVR procedural planning considerations, a step-by-step guide on how to perform an aortic and mitral STVR and its critical considerations, as well as the procedural and follow-up results.
RESUMO
Background: Conduction disease is an important and common complication post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Previously, we developed a conduction disease risk stratification and management protocol post-TAVR. This study aims to evaluate high-grade aortic valve block (HAVB) incidence and risk factors in a large cohort undergoing ambulatory cardiac monitoring post-TAVR according to conduction risk grouping. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study evaluated all patients discharged on ambulatory cardiac monitoring between 2016 and 2021 and stratified them into 3 groups based on electrocardiogram predictors of HAVB risk (group 1 [low], group 2 [intermediate], and group 3 [high]). HAVB was defined as ≥2 consecutive nonconducted P waves in sinus rhythm or bradycardia <50 beats/minute with a fixed rate for atrial fibrillation/flutter. Descriptive statistics were used to show the incidence and timeline, while logistic regression was utilized to evaluate predictors of HAVB. Results: Five hundred twenty-eight patients were included (median age 80 years [74-85]; 43.8% female). Forty-one patients (7.8%) developed HAVB during ambulatory monitoring (68% were asymptomatic). Over a median follow-up of 2 years (1.3-2.7), the overall mortality rate was 15.0% (30-day mortality rate of 0.57%, n = 3). Risk factors for HAVB were male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.46, p = 0.02, 95% CI = 1.21-5.43), baseline right bundle branch block (OR = 2.80, p = 0.01, 95% CI = 1.17-6.19), and post-TAVR QRS >150 âms (OR = 2.16, p = 0.03, 95% CI = 1.01-4.40). The negative predictive value for patients in groups 1 and 2 for 30-day HAVB was 95.0 and 93.8%, respectively. Conclusions: The risk of 30-day HAVB post-TAVR on ambulatory monitoring post-TAVR varies according to post-TAVR electrocardiogram findings, and a 3-group algorithm effectively identifies groups with a low negative predictive value for HAVB.
RESUMO
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been recently indicated for the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis in all risk profiles. At present, TAVR has become mature at home and abroad, but the relevant experience is deficient in the treatment of aortic valve stenosis with outflow tract stenosis. One case of a high-risk surgical patient was included in this paper who suffered from severe aortic valve stenosis with left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) stenosis. In this case, TAVR was performed with deep implantation of a new valve and both aortic valve stenosis and LVOT stenosis were treated through a single TAVR procedure. This case highlights the vital role of such treatment in dealing with both aortic valve stenosis and LVOT stenosis through a single TAVR procedure, thus providing valuable information for similar cases.
RESUMO
There are numerous approaches for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); however, access-related complications remain a point of concern. We analyzed consecutive patients who underwent TAVR for severe aortic stenosis via the brachiocephalic artery (BCA) without sternotomy (TBc group, n = 10) and via the trans-ascending aortic (TAo group, n = 8). The median BCA diameter and distance between the access point and suprasternal notch or superior margin of the clavicle were 11.3 mm and 8.3 mm, respectively. No patients in the TBc group underwent a partial sternotomy. Compared with the TAo group, the TBc group exhibited a shorter mean procedure time and lower blood loss volume as well as shorter duration of hospitalization. TAVR through the BCA may be a safe and feasible alternative for ascending aorta access. Studies with longer follow-up analysis and more patients are warranted to confirm our findings.
RESUMO
Key Clinical Message: In recent years, it is necessary to Redo-TAVR for the patients with bioprosthetic valve degeneration. This case report described a unique instance to successfully Redo-TAVR a patient with bioprosthetic valve degeneration, in addition, with left cerebral infarction and renal insufficiency. Abstract: Over time, more and more patients have bioprosthetic valve degeneration either used in SAVR or TAVR. In order to solve the produced problems due to the degenerated bioprosthetic valve, Redo-TAVR was increasingly popular due to its safe and efficiency especially for the high risk and complicated symptoms patients. In this case, the patient with left cerebral infarction and renal insufficiency has exhibited severe regurgitation and obvious neoplasm around the previous replaced aortic valve. For the patient with complicated symptoms, we did not image for this patient and only used CT to determine the position and angle for the Redo-TAVR on the base of metal stent for the previous replaced aortic valve. During the Redo-TAVR process, for fear of the obvious neoplasm slipping from the previous replaced aortic valve to embolism of important organs, before carrying out the Redo-TAVR, cerebral protection device, temporary pacemaker, and coronary artery protection device were utilized in order to avoid the damage for the important organs from the obvious neoplasm slipping from the previous replaced aortic valve. The surgery was successful and the patient recovered well. The patient's symptoms of chest tightness and suffocation have been greatly reduced.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of changing systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP, respectively) on sinus flow and valvular and epicardial coronary flow dynamics after TAVR and SAVR. METHODS: SAPIEN 3 and Magna valves were deployed in an idealized aortic root model as part of a pulse duplicating left heart flow loop simulator. Different combinations of SBP and DBP were applied to the test setup and the resulting change in total coronary flow from baseline (120/60 mmHg), effective orifice area (EOA), and left ventricular (LV) workload, with each combination, was assessed. In addition, particle image velocimetry was used to assess the Laplacian of pressure ( ∇ 2 P ) in the sinus, coronary and main flow velocities, the energy dissipation rate (EDR) in the sinus and the LV workload. RESULTS: This study shows that under an elevated SBP, there is an increase in the total coronary flow, EOA, LV workload, peak velocities downstream of the valve, ∇ 2 P , and EDR. With an elevated DBP, there was an increase in the total coronary flow and ∇ 2 P . However, EOA and LV workload decreased with an increase in DBP, and EDR increased with a decrease in DBP. CONCLUSIONS: Blood pressure alters the hemodynamics in the sinus and downstream flow following aortic valve replacement, potentially influencing outcomes in some patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Dialysis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) generally have poor prognosis compared with non-dialysis patients. Furthermore, there are few reliable risk models in this clinical setting. Therefore, we aimed to establish a risk model in dialysis patients undergoing TAVR that would be informative for their prognosis and the decision-making process of TAVR. METHODS: A total 118 dialysis patients (full cohort) with severe aortic stenosis underwent TAVR in our institute between 2012 and 2022. The patients of the full cohort were randomly assigned to two groups in a 2:1 ratio to form derivation and validation cohorts. Risk factors contributing to deaths were analyzed from the preoperative variables and a risk model was established from Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS: There were 69 deaths following TAVR derived from infectious disease (43.5â¯%), cardiovascular-related disease (11.6â¯%), cerebral stroke or hemorrhage (2.9â¯%), cancer (1.4â¯%), unknown origin (18.8â¯%), and others (21.7â¯%) during the observational period (811⯱â¯719â¯days). The cumulative overall survival rates using the Kaplan-Meier method at 1â¯year, 3â¯years, and 5â¯years in the full cohort were 82.8â¯%, 41.9â¯%, and 24.2â¯%, respectively. An optimal risk model composed of five contributors: peripheral vascular disease, serum albumin, left ventricular ejection fractionâ¯<â¯40â¯%, operative age, and hemoglobin level, was established. The estimated C index for the developed models were 0.748 (95â¯% CI: 0.672-0.824) in derivation cohort and 0.705 (95â¯% CI: 0.578-0.832) in validation cohort. The prediction model showed good calibration [intraclass correlation coefficientâ¯=â¯0.937 (95%CI: 0.806-0.981)] between actual and predicted survival. CONCLUSIONS: The risk model was a good indicator to estimate the prognosis in dialysis patients undergoing TAVR.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Older adults with severe aortic stenosis (AS) may receive care in a nursing home (NH) prior to undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). NH level of care can be used to stabilize medical conditions, to provide rehabilitation services, or for long-term care services. Our primary objective is to determine whether NH utilization pre-TAVR can be used to stratify patients at risk for higher mortality and poor disposition outcomes at 30 and 365 days post-TAVR. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among Medicare beneficiaries who spent ≥1 day in an NH 6 months before TAVR (2011-2019). The intensity of NH utilization was categorized as low users (1-30 days), medium users (31-89 days), long-stay NH residents (≥ 100 days, with no more than a 10-day gap in care), and high post-acute rehabilitation patients (≥90 days, with more than a 10-day gap in care). The probabilities of death and disposition were estimated using multinomial logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, and race. RESULTS: Among 15,581 patients, 9908 (63.6%) were low users, 4312 (27.7%) were medium users, 663 (4.3%) were high post-acute care rehab users, and 698 (4.4%) were long-stay NH residents before TAVR. High post-acute care rehabilitation patients were more likely to have dementia, weight loss, falls, and extensive dependence of activities of daily living (ADLs) as compared with low NH users. Mortality was the greatest in high post-acute care rehab users: 5.5% at 30 days, and 36.4% at 365 days. In contrast, low NH users had similar mortality rates compared with long-stay NH residents: 4.8% versus 4.8% at 30 days, and 24.9% versus 27.0% at 365 days. CONCLUSION: Frequent bouts of post-acute rehabilitation before TAVR were associated with adverse outcomes, yet this metric may be helpful to determine which patients with severe AS could benefit from palliative and geriatric services.
RESUMO
Background: Injury to the cardiac conduction system requiring a permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation is a known adverse outcome of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Temporary-permanent pacemakers (TPPM) have been used as a bridge to PPM implantation in patients with systemic infection; however, there are only a few reports of its routine use in patients undergoing TAVR. This study aimed to assess the utility of routine use of TPPM in patients undergoing TAVR with a high risk of needing a PPM or those who develop high-grade conduction abnormalities during/after TAVR. Methods: Between April 2015 and December 2021, 978 patients underwent TAVR at our institution, of whom 111 patients had TPPM placed before or during/after TAVR during the study period. In total, 89 patients were included in the final analysis. Results: The median age was 78 years (IQR, 71-84 years); 52 (58.4%) patients with preexisting native conduction disease were considered high risk for advanced heart block and had TPPM placed before TAVR. In addition, 37 (41.6%) patients had TPPM placed during/after TAVR. Of the 89 patients who received TPPM, 51 (57.3%) were treated with a balloon-expandable valve and 38 (42.7%) with a self-expandable valve. Of the patients who underwent TPPM placement, only 49 (55.1%) required a PPM, and TPPM was removed in 40 (44.9%) patients. TPPM was in place for a median of 6 days (IQR, 2-11 days). Only 1 of the 89 patients (1.1%) who received a TPPM had lead dislodgment. No other complications were noted. Median length of stay was 3 days (IQR, 2-4 days). Conclusions: In patients with high-risk baseline conduction abnormalities before TAVR and those who develop new high-grade conduction abnormalities during/after TAVR, TPPM provides a feasible and safe method for pacing that could allow early ambulation, facilitate early discharge, and prevent unnecessary PPM implantations in some patients.
RESUMO
Acute limb ischemia requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. Thromboembolic events are common, especially in patients with multiple risk factors. This case report describes a rare complication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) involving thromboembolic occlusion of the radial artery and highlights the risk of embolic complications during TAVR. While TAVR is minimally invasive and preferred for high-risk patients, it carries the risk of complications such as paravalvular leakage and cerebrovascular events. Prompt recognition and management are crucial. Various mechanisms, including catheter manipulation and altered hemodynamics, contribute to embolic risks during TAVR. Awareness and management of rare embolic complications during TAVR are essential. Further research is needed to prevent these complications and improve patient outcomes.
RESUMO
Background: Post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), paravalvular leak (PVL) is a quality metric associated with worse clinical outcomes. Transcatheter heart valve (THV) sizing is based primarily on the systolic annular size without regard to the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), which also lies within the THV landing zone. We hypothesized that LVOT size relative to the annulus is associated with post-TAVR PVL. Methods: Data from consecutive patients undergoing TAVR in a single high-volume center from January 2018 to March 2019 were used. Pre-TAVR data from multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) were collected. Relative LVOT area was defined as LVOT area/annular area during systole. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate association with post-TAVR mild or greater PVL by transthoracic echocardiography before discharge. Results: Among 293 patients (median age, 81.1 years; female, 49.5%; White, 88.0%), 81.6% received SAPIEN 3 and 18.4% received CoreValve THV models. Aortic valve morphology was bicuspid in 10.9% of patients. Prevalence of mild or greater PVL was 23.5% (mild in 20.1%). Relative LVOT area had a significant inverse association such that the odds of mild or greater PVL decreased significantly with every 1% increase in relative LVOT area (adjusted odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.98; P = .002). There was no interaction between the type of implanted valve and the relative LVOT area. Patients in the highest relative LVOT tertile had significantly lower odds of mild or greater PVL (adjusted odds ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.87; P = .018 vs first tertile). Conclusions: In patients undergoing TAVR with the newer generation of THV (SAPIEN 3 and CoreValve models), a relatively narrower LVOT area vs annular area was independently associated with increased odds of mild or greater PVL before discharge.