A marginal structural model for normal tissue complication probability.

The goal of radiation therapy for cancer is to deliver prescribed radiation dose to the tumor while minimizing dose to the surrounding healthy tissues. To evaluate treatment plans, the dose distribution to healthy organs is commonly summarized as dose-volume histograms (DVHs). Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) modeling has centered around making patient-level risk predictions with features extracted from the DVHs, but few have considered adapting a causal framework to evaluate the safety of alternative treatment plans. We propose causal estimands for NTCP based on deterministic and stochastic interventions, as well as propose estimators based on marginal structural models that impose bivariable monotonicity between dose, volume, and toxicity risk. The properties of these estimators are studied through simulations, and their use is illustrated in the context of radiotherapy treatment of anal canal cancer patients.

Total body irradiation: A transition from a Co-60 treatment unit to an IMRT lateral-field extended-SAD technique.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to detail our center's experience in transitioning from a Co-60 treatment technique to an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) based lateral-field extended source-to-axis distance (e-SAD) technique for total body irradiation (TBI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An existing beam model in RayStation v.10A was validated for the use of e-SAD TBI treatments. Data were acquired with an Elekta Synergy linear accelerator (LINAC) at an extended source-to-surface distance of 365 cm with an 18 MV beam. Beam model validation measurements included percentage depth dose (PDD), profile data, surface dose, build-up region and transmission measurements. End-to-end testing was carried out using an anthropomorphic phantom. Treatments were performed in a supine position in a whole-body Vac-Lok at an e-SAD of 400 cm with a beam spoiler 10 cm from the couch. Planning was achieved using IMRT, where multi-leaf collimators were used to modulate the beam and shield the organs at risk. Beam's eye view projection images were used for in-room patient positioning and in-vivo dosimetry was performed for every treatment. RESULTS: The percent difference between the measured and calculated PDD and profiles was less than 2% at all locations. Surface dose was 83.8% of the maximum dose with the beam spoiler at a 10 cm distance from the phantom. The largest percent difference between the treatment planning system (TPS) and measured data within the anthropomorphic phantom was approximately 2%. In-vivo dosimetry measurements yielded results within the 5% institutional threshold. CONCLUSION: In 2022, 17 patients were successfully treated using the new IMRT-based lateral-field e-SAD TBI technique. The resulting clinical plans respected the institutional standard. The commissioning process, as well as the treatment planning and delivery aspects were described in this work with the intention of supporting other clinics in implementing this treatment method.

Surface dose measurement by optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter: A phantom study.

INTRODUCTION: Radiotherapy is the standard treatment for breast cancer patients after surgery. However, radiotherapy can cause side effects such as dry and moist desquamation of the patient's skin. The dose calculation from a treatment planning system (TPS) might also be inaccurate. The purpose of this study is to measure the surface dose on the CIRS thorax phantom by an optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD). METHODS: The characteristics of OSLD were studied in terms of dose linearity, reproducibility, and angulation dependence on the solid water phantom. To determine the surface dose, OSLD (Landauer lnc., USA) was placed on 5 positions at the CIRS phantom (Tissue Simulation and Phantom Technology, USA). The five positions were at the tip, medial, lateral, tip-medial, and tip-lateral. Then, the doses from OSLD and TPS were compared. RESULTS: The dosimeter's characteristic test was good. The maximum dose at a depth of 15 mm was 514.46 cGy, which was at 100%. The minimum dose at the surface was 174.91 cGy, which was at 34%. The results revealed that the surface dose from TPS was less than the measurement. The percent dose difference was -2.17 ± 6.34, -12.08 ± 3.85, and -48.71 ± 1.29 at the tip, medial, and lateral positions, respectively. The surface dose from TPS at tip-medial and tip-lateral was higher than the measurement, which was 12.56 ± 5.55 and 10.45 ± 1.76 percent dose different, respectively. CONCLUSION: The percent dose difference is within the acceptable limit, except for the lateral position because of the body curvature. However, OSLD is convenient to assess the radiation dose, and further study is to measure in vivo. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: The OSL NanoDot dosimeter can be used for dose validation with a constant setup location. The measurement dose is higher than the dose from TPS, except for some tilt angles.

A novel fast robust optimization algorithm for intensity-modulated proton therapy with minimum monitor unit constraint.

BACKGROUND: Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimizes spot intensities and position, providing better conformability. However, the successful application of IMPT is dependent upon addressing the challenges posed by range and setup uncertainties. In order to address the uncertainties in IMPT, robust optimization is essential. PURPOSE: This study aims to develop a novel fast algorithm for robust optimization of IMPT with minimum monitor unit (MU) constraint. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The study formulates a robust optimization problem and proposes a novel, fast algorithm based on the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) framework. This algorithm enables distributed computation and parallel processing. Ten clinical cases were used as test scenarios to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach. The robust optimization method (RBO-NEW) was compared with plans that only consider nominal optimization using CTV (NMO-CTV) without handling uncertainties and PTV (NMO-PTV) to handle the uncertainties, as well as with conventional robust-optimized plans (RBO-CONV). Dosimetric metrics, including D95, homogeneity index, and Dmean, were used to evaluate the dose distribution quality. The area under the root-mean-square dose (RMSD)-volume histogram curves (AUC) and dose-volume histogram (DVH) bands were used to evaluate the robustness of the treatment plan. Optimization time cost was also assessed to measure computational efficiency. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that the RBO plans exhibited better plan quality and robustness than the NMO plans, with RBO-NEW showing superior computational efficiency and plan quality compared to RBO-CONV. Specifically, statistical analysis results indicated that RBO-NEW was able to reduce the computational time from 389.70 ± 207.40 $389.70\pm 207.40$ to 228.60 ± 123.67 $228.60\pm 123.67$ s ( p < 0.01 $p<0.01$ ) and reduce the mean organ-at-risk (OAR) dose from 9.38 ± 12.80 $9.38\pm 12.80$ % of the prescription dose to 9.07 ± 12.39 $9.07\pm 12.39$ % of the prescription dose ( p < 0.05 $p<0.05$ ) compared to RBO-CONV. CONCLUSION: This study introduces a novel fast robust optimization algorithm for IMPT treatment planning with minimum MU constraint. Such an algorithm is not only able to enhance the plan's robustness and computational efficiency without compromising OAR sparing but also able to improve treatment plan quality and reliability.

Modelling systematic anatomical uncertainties of head and neck cancer patients during fractionated radiotherapy treatment.

Head and neck cancer patients experience systematic anatomical changes as well as random day to day anatomical changes during fractionated radiotherapy treatment. Modelling the expected systematic anatomical changes could aid in creating treatment plans which are more robust against such changes. A patient specific (SM) and population average (AM) model are presented which are able to capture the systematic anatomical changes of some head and neck cancer patients over the course of radiotherapy treatment. Inter- patient correspondence aligned all patients to a model space. Intra- patient correspondence between each planning CT scan and on treatment cone beam CT scans was obtained using diffeomorphic deformable image registration. The stationary velocity fields were then used to develop B-Spline based SMs and AMs. The models were evaluated geometrically and dosimetrically. A leave-one-out method was used to compare the training and testing accuracy of the models. Both SMs and AMs were able to capture systematic changes. The average surface distance between the registration propagated contours and the contours generated by the SM was less than 2mm, showing that the SM are able to capture the anatomical changes which a patient experiences during the course of radiotherapy. The testing accuracy was lower than the training accuracy of the SM, suggesting that the model overfits to the limited data available and therefore also captures some of the random day to day changes. For most patients the AMs were a better estimate of the anatomical changes than assuming there were no changes, but the AMs could not capture the variability in the anatomical changes seen in all patients. No difference was seen in the training and testing accuracy of the AMs. These observations were highlighted in both the geometric and dosimetric evaluations and comparisons. The large patient variability highlights the need for more complex, capable population models.

The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Radiotherapy Treatment Planning-A Literature Review.

This paper examines the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiotherapy for cancer treatment. The importance of radiotherapy in cancer management and its time-intensive planning process make AI adoption appealing especially with the escalating demand for radiotherapy. This review highlights the efficacy of AI across medical domains, where it surpasses human capabilities in areas such as cardiology and dermatology. Focusing on radiotherapy, the paper details AI's applications in target segmentation, dose optimization, and outcome prediction. It discusses adaptive radiotherapy's benefits and AI's potential to enhance patient outcomes with much improved treatment accuracy. The paper explores ethical concerns, including data privacy and bias, stressing the need for robust guidelines. Educating healthcare professionals and patients about AI's role is crucial as it acknowledges potential job-role changes and concerns about patients' trust in the use of AI. Overall, the integration of AI in radiotherapy holds transformative potential in streamlining processes, improving outcomes, and reducing costs. AI's potential to reduce healthcare costs underscores its significance with impactful change globally. However, successful implementation hinges on addressing ethical and logistical challenges and fostering collaboration among healthcare professionals and patient population data sets for its optimal utilization. Rigorous education, collaborative efforts, and global data sharing will be the compass guiding its' success in radiotherapy and healthcare.

The Diagnostic Impact of Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) in Evaluating Lymph Node Involvement in Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant global health burden, necessitating accurate staging and treatment planning for optimal patient outcomes. Lymph node involvement is a critical determinant of prognosis in CRC, emphasizing the importance of reliable imaging techniques for its evaluation. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) has emerged as a cornerstone in CRC imaging, offering high-resolution anatomical detail and vascular assessment. This comprehensive review synthesizes the existing literature to evaluate the diagnostic impact of CECT in assessing lymph node involvement in CRC. Key findings highlight CECT's high sensitivity and specificity in detecting lymph node metastases, facilitating accurate staging and treatment selection. However, challenges such as limited resolution for small lymph nodes and potential false-positives call for a cautious interpretation. Recommendations for clinical practice suggest the integration of CECT into multidisciplinary treatment algorithms, optimizing imaging protocols and enhancing collaboration between radiologists and clinicians. Future research directions include refining imaging protocols, comparative effectiveness studies with emerging modalities, and prospective validation of CECT's prognostic value. Overall, this review stresses the pivotal role of CECT in CRC management and identifies avenues for further advancements in imaging-guided oncology care.

Geometrical accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for ocular proton therapy planning.

Background & purpose: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in treatment preparation of ocular proton therapy, but its spatial accuracy might be limited by geometric distortions due to susceptibility artefacts. A correct geometry of the MR images is paramount since it defines where the dose will be delivered. In this study, we assessed the geometrical accuracy of ocular MRI. Materials & methods: A dedicated ocular 3 T MRI protocol, with localized shimming and increased gradients, was compared to computed tomography (CT) and X-ray images in a phantom and in 15 uveal melanoma patients. The MRI protocol contained three-dimensional T2-weighted and T1-weighted sequences with an isotropic reconstruction resolution of 0.3-0.4 mm. Tantalum clips were identified by three observers and clip-clip distances were compared between T2-weighted and T1-weighted MRI, CT and X-ray images for the phantom and between MRI and X-ray images for the patients. Results: Interobserver variability was below 0.35 mm for the phantom and 0.30(T1)/0.61(T2) mm in patients. Mean absolute differences between MRI and reference were below 0.27 ± 0.16 mm and 0.32 ± 0.23 mm for the phantom and in patients, respectively. In patients, clip-clip distances were slightly larger on MRI than on X-ray images (mean difference T1: 0.11 ± 0.38 mm, T2: 0.10 ± 0.44 mm). Differences did not increase at larger distances and did not correlate to interobserver variability. Conclusions: A dedicated ocular MRI protocol can produce images of the eye with a geometrical accuracy below half the MRI acquisition voxel (<0.4 mm). Therefore, these images can be used for ocular proton therapy planning, both in the current model-based workflow and in proposed three-dimensional MR-based workflows.

Assessing the Impact of AI-Enhanced Diagnostic Tools on the Treatment Planning of Orthodontic Cases: An RCT.

Background: Orthodontic treatment planning involves the precise assessment of dental and skeletal anomalies, which can be facilitated by AI-enhanced diagnostic tools. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 orthodontic cases were included in this RCT. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: an AI-enhanced diagnostic group and a traditional diagnostic group. The AI-enhanced diagnostic group underwent orthodontic assessment with the aid of AI-powered software, which provided automated cephalometric analysis, 3D model evaluations, and treatment suggestions. The traditional diagnostic group received conventional diagnostic assessments by orthodontists. The primary outcome measures included treatment planning accuracy, treatment time, and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included the number of appointments required and treatment cost. Results: The AI-enhanced diagnostic group demonstrated a significantly higher accuracy in treatment planning compared to the traditional diagnostic group (P < 0.05). The AI group also required fewer appointments (mean ± SD: 10.2 ± 2.1 vs. 12.8 ± 3.4) and had a shorter treatment time (mean ± SD: 14.6 ± 3.2 months vs. 18.9 ± 4.5 months) (P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Additionally, patient satisfaction scores were higher in the AI group (mean ± SD: 9.2 ± 0.6 vs. 8.1 ± 0.8) (P < 0.001). However, the AI-enhanced diagnostic group had a slightly higher treatment cost. Conclusion: AI-enhanced diagnostic tools significantly enhance the accuracy of treatment planning in orthodontic cases, leading to reduced treatment time, fewer appointments, and increased patient satisfaction.

Sensitivity of automated and manual treatment planning approaches to contouring variation in early-breast cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: One of the advantages of integrating automated processes in treatment planning is the reduction of manual planning variability. This study aims to assess whether a deep-learning-based auto-planning solution can also reduce the contouring variation-related impact on the planned dose for early-breast cancer treatment. METHODS: Auto- and manual plans were optimized for 20 patients using both auto- and manual OARs, including both lungs, right breast, heart, and left-anterior-descending (LAD) artery. Differences in terms of recalculated dose (ΔDrcM,ΔDrcA) and reoptimized dose (ΔDroM,ΔDroA) for manual (M) and auto (A)-plans, were evaluated on manual structures. The correlation between several geometric similarities and dose differences was also explored (Spearman's test). RESULTS: Auto-contours were found slightly smaller in size than manual contours for right breast and heart and more than twice larger for LAD. Recalculated dose differences were found negligible for both planning approaches except for heart (ΔDrcM=-0.4 Gy, ΔDrcA=-0.3 Gy) and right breast (ΔDrcM=-1.2 Gy, ΔDrcA=-1.3 Gy) maximum dose. Re-optimized dose differences were considered equivalent to recalculated ones for both lungs and LAD, while they were significantly smaller for heart (ΔDroM=-0.2 Gy, ΔDroA=-0.2 Gy) and right breast (ΔDroM =-0.3 Gy, ΔDroA=-0.9 Gy) maximum dose. Twenty-one correlations were found for ΔDrcM,A (M=8,A=13) that reduced to four for ΔDroM,A (M=3,A=1). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of auto-planning to contouring variation was found not relevant when compared to manual planning, regardless of the method used to calculate the dose differences. Nonetheless, the method employed to define the dose differences strongly affected the correlation analysis resulting highly reduced when dose was reoptimized, regardless of the planning approach.

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Endodontics.

Endodontics is the dental specialty foremost concerned with diseases of the pulp and periradicular tissues. Clinicians often face patients with varying symptoms, must critically assess radiographic images in 2 and 3 dimensions, derive complex diagnoses and decision making, and deliver sophisticated treatment. Paired with low intra- and interobserver agreement for radiographic interpretation and variations in treatment outcome resulting from nonstandardized clinical techniques, there exists an unmet need for support in the form of artificial intelligence (AI), providing automated biomedical image analysis, decision support, and assistance during treatment. In the past decade, there has been a steady increase in AI studies in endodontics but limited clinical application. This review focuses on critically assessing the recent advancements in endodontic AI research for clinical applications, including the detection and diagnosis of endodontic pathologies such as periapical lesions, fractures and resorptions, as well as clinical treatment outcome predictions. It discusses the benefits of AI-assisted diagnosis, treatment planning and execution, and future directions including augmented reality and robotics. It critically reviews the limitations and challenges imposed by the nature of endodontic data sets, AI transparency and generalization, and potential ethical dilemmas. In the near future, AI will significantly affect the everyday endodontic workflow, education, and continuous learning.

To Preserve or Extract? A Scoping Review and a Prognostic Decision Tool using Multispecialty Indicators.

As implant-supported restorations have become very popular, there is a tendency to extract teeth and replace them with implants. However, the first goal of dentistry should always be the preservation of natural teeth, given the prerequisite that these can be maintained with the application of appropriate treatment modalities. Therefore, individual tooth risk assessment and prognosis are very important in the treatment plan process. Four important factors influencing the dentist's decision on whether to save or extract a compromised tooth have been identified, and an extensive search of the related English language literature has been performed. Additionally, hand-search in related journals was implemented, and classical textbooks were consulted. Identified articles on patient-related, periodontal, endodontic, and restorative factors were thoroughly analyzed, focusing on diagnosis and tooth prognosis. Fifty-two selected references have been carefully selected and reviewed. Available information was used to develop a color-coded prognostic decision chart with four different factors and up to fourteen crucial parameters. All factors and parameters were analyzed in an effort to help the restorative dentist make a prognostic decision. The proposed color-coded prognostic decision chart can be helpful when a treatment plan is made, and predictable restorative care is planned. This comprehensive prognostic decision chart can aid dentists in providing clinical care of high quality and establishing a consensus on available restorative options. It can additionally establish appropriate communication with patients and third-party individuals in the restorative care process, effectively manage risk factors, and provide a framework for quality assessment in restorative treatment.

Quality assurance of an established online adaptive radiotherapy program: patch and software upgrade.

Introduction: The ability to dynamically adjust target contours, derived Boolean structures, and ultimately, the optimized fluence is the end goal of online adaptive radiotherapy (ART). The purpose of this work is to describe the necessary tests to perform after a software patch installation and/or upgrade for an established online ART program. Methods: A patch upgrade on a low-field MR Linac system was evaluated for post-software upgrade quality assurance (QA) with current infrastructure of ART workflow on (1) the treatment planning system (TPS) during the initial planning stage and (2) the treatment delivery system (TDS), which is a TPS integrated into the delivery console for online ART planning. Online ART QA procedures recommended for post-software upgrade include: (1) user interface (UI) configuration; (2) TPS beam model consistency; (3) segmentation consistency; (4) dose calculation consistency; (5) optimizer robustness consistency; (6) CT density table consistency; and (7) end-to-end absolute ART dose and predicted dose measured including interruption testing. Differences of calculated doses were evaluated through DVH and/or 3D gamma comparisons. The measured dose was assessed using an MR-compatible A26 ionization chamber in a motion phantom. Segmentation differences were assessed through absolute volume and visual inspection. Results: (1) No UI configuration discrepancies were observed. (2) Dose differences on TPS pre-/post-software upgrade were within 1% for DVH metrics. (3) Differences in segmentation when observed were small in general, with the largest change noted for small-volume regions of interest (ROIs) due to partial volume impact. (4) Agreement between TPS and TDS calculated doses was 99.9% using a 2%/2-mm gamma criteria. (5) Comparison between TPS and online ART plans for a given patient plan showed agreement within 2% for targets and 0.6 cc for organs at risk. (6) Relative electron densities demonstrated comparable agreement between TPS and TDS. (7) ART absolute and predicted measured end-to-end doses were within 1% of calculated TDS. Discussion: An online ART QA program for post-software upgrade has been developed and implemented on an MR Linac system. Testing mechanics and their respective baselines may vary across institutions, but all necessary components for a post-software upgrade QA have been outlined and detailed. These outlined tests were demonstrated feasible for a low-field MR Linac system; however, the scope of this work may be applied and adapted more broadly to other online ART platforms.

Artificial intelligence chatbot vs pathology faculty and residents: Real-world clinical questions from a genitourinary treatment planning conference.

OBJECTIVES: Artificial intelligence (AI)-based chatbots have demonstrated accuracy in a variety of fields, including medicine, but research has yet to substantiate their accuracy and clinical relevance. We evaluated an AI chatbot's answers to questions posed during a treatment planning conference. METHODS: Pathology residents, pathology faculty, and an AI chatbot (OpenAI ChatGPT [January 30, 2023, release]) answered a questionnaire curated from a genitourinary subspecialty treatment planning conference. Results were evaluated by 2 blinded adjudicators: a clinician expert and a pathology expert. Scores were based on accuracy and clinical relevance. RESULTS: Overall, faculty scored highest (4.75), followed by the AI chatbot (4.10), research-prepared residents (3.50), and unprepared residents (2.87). The AI chatbot scored statistically significantly better than unprepared residents (P = .03) but not statistically significantly different from research-prepared residents (P = .33) or faculty (P = .30). Residents did not statistically significantly improve after research (P = .39), and faculty performed statistically significantly better than both resident categories (unprepared, P < .01; research prepared, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The AI chatbot gave answers to medical questions that were comparable in accuracy and clinical relevance to pathology faculty, suggesting promise for further development. Serious concerns remain, however, that without the ability to provide support with references, AI will face legitimate scrutiny as to how it can be integrated into medical decision-making.

Deep learning-based voxel sampling for particle therapy treatment planning.

OBJECTIVE: Scanned particle therapy often requires complex treatment plans, robust optimization, as well as treatment adaptation. Plan optimization is especially complicated for heavy ions due to the variable relative biological effectiveness. We present a novel deep-learning model to select a subset of voxels in the planning process thus reducing the planning problem size for improved computational efficiency. Approach: Using only a subset of the voxels in target and organs at risk (OARs) we produced high-quality treatment plans, but heuristic selection strategies require manual input. We designed a deep-learning model based on P-Net to obtain an optimal voxel sampling without relying on patient-specific user input. A cohort of 70 head and neck patients that received carbon ion therapy was used for model training (50), validation (10) and testing (10). For training, a total of 12,500 carbon ion plans were optimized, using a highly efficient artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure implemented into a research treatment planning platform. A custom loss function increased sampling density in underdosed regions, while aiming to reduce the total number of voxels. Main results: On the test dataset, the number of voxels in the optimization could be reduced by 84.8% (median) at <1% median loss in plan quality. When the model was trained to reduce sampling in the target only while keeping all voxels in OARs, a median reduction up to 71.6% was achieved, with 0.5% loss in the plan quality. The optimization time was reduced by a factor of 7.5 for the total AI selection model and a factor of 3.7 for the model with only target selection. Significance: The novel deep-learning voxel sampling technique achieves a significant reduction in computational time with a negligible loss in the plan quality. The reduction in optimization time can be especially useful for future real-time adaptation strategies. .

Improving the Feasibility of Mitigating Phase Errors in 4DCT caused by a Random Reference Breathing Pattern in the Quasar Phantom and the Role of Slice Thickness.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to validate a method for minimizing phase errors by combining full-length lung 4DCT (f4DCT) scans with shorter tumor-restricted 4DCT (s4DCT) scans. It assessed the feasibility of integrating two scans one covering the entire phantom length and the other focused on the tumor area. The study also evaluated the impact of Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) volume and imaging dose for different slice thicknesses (2.5mm and 1.25mm) in both full-length and short target-restricted 4DCT scans. METHODS: The study utilized the Quasar Programmable Respiratory Motion Phantom, simulating tumor motion with a variable lung insert. The setup included a tumor replica and a six-dot IR reflector marker on the breathing platform. The objective was to analyze volume differences in fMIP_2.5mm compared to sMIP_1.25mm within their respective 4D_MIP CT series. This involved varying breathing periods (2.5s, 3.0s, 4.0s, and 5.0s) and longitudinal tumor sizes (6mm, 8mm, and 10mm). The study also assessed exposure time and expected CTDIvol of s4D_2.5mm and s4D_1.25mm for different breathing periods (5.0s to 2.0s) in the sinusoidal wave motion of the six-dot marker on the breathing platform. RESULTS: Conducting two consecutive 4DCT scans is viable for patients with challenging breathing patterns or when the initial lung tumor scan is in close proximity to the tumor location, eliminating the need for an additional full-length 4DCT. The analysis involves assessing MIP volume, imaging dose (CTDIvol), and exposure time. Longitudinal tumor shifts for 6mm are [16.6-17.2] in fMIP_2.5mm and [16.8-17.5] in sMIP_1.25mm, for 8mm [17.2-18.3] in fMIP_2.5mm and [17.8-18.4] in sMIP_1.25mm, and for 10mm [19-19.9] in fMIP_2.5mm and [19.4-20] in sMIP_1.25mm (p≥ 0.005), respectively. CONCLUSION: The Quasar Programmable Respiratory Motion Phantom accurately replicated varied breathing patterns and tumor motions. Comprehensive analysis was facilitated through detailed manual segmentation of Internal Target Volumes and Internal Gross Target Volumes.

Dosimetric evaluation and treatment planning considerations for GammaTile permanent brain implants - a pilot, institutional experience.

PURPOSE: GammaTile® (GT) is a brachytherapy platform that received Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approval as brain tumor therapy in late 2018. Here, we reviewed our institutional experience with GT as treatment for recurrent glioblastomas and characterized dosimetric parameter and associated clinical outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 20 consecutive patients with 21 (n = 21) diagnosis of recurrent glioblastoma underwent resection followed by intraoperative GT implant between 01/2019 and 12/2020. Data on gross tumor volume (GTV), number of GT units implanted, dose coverage for the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), measured by D90 or dose received by 90% of the HR-CTV, dose to organs at risk, and six months local control were collected. RESULTS: The median D90 to HR-CTV was 56.0 Gy (31.7-98.7 Gy). The brainstem, optic chiasm, ipsilateral optic nerve, and ipsilateral hippocampus median Dmax were 11.2, 5.4, 6.4, and 10.0 Gy, respectively. None of the patients in this study cohort suffered from radiation necrosis or adverse events attributable to the GT. Correlation was found between pre-op GTV, the volume of the resection cavity, and the number of GT units implanted. Of the resection cavities, 7/21 (33%) of the cavity experienced shrinkage, 3/21 (14%) remained stable, and 11/21 (52%) of the cavities expanded on the 3-months post-resection/GT implant MRIs. D90 to HR-CTV was found to be associated with local recurrence at 6-month post GT implant, suggesting a dose response relationship (p = 0.026). The median local recurrence-free survival was 366.5 days (64-1,098 days), and a trend towards improved local recurrence-free survival was seen in patients with D90 to HR-CTV ≥ 56 Gy (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot, institutional experience provides clinical outcome, dosimetric considerations, and offer technical guidance in the clinical implementation of GT brachytherapy.

A randomized controlled trial of shared decision-making treatment planning process to enhance shared decision-making in patients with MBC.

PURPOSE: Opportunities exist for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to engage in shared decision-making (SDM). Presenting patient-reported data, including patient treatment preferences, to oncologists before or during a treatment plan decision may improve patient engagement in treatment decisions. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial evaluated the standard-of-care treatment planning process vs. a novel treatment planning process focused on SDM, which included oncologist review of patient-reported treatment preferences, prior to or during treatment decisions among women with MBC. The primary outcome was patient perception of shared decision-making. Secondary outcomes included patient activation, treatment satisfaction, physician perception of treatment decision-making, and use of treatment plans. RESULTS: Among the 109 evaluable patients from December 2018 to June 2022, 28% were Black and 12% lived in a highly disadvantaged neighborhood. Although not reaching statistical significance, patients in the intervention arm perceived SDM more often than patients in the control arm (63% vs. 59%; Cramer's V = 0.05; OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.55-2.57). Among patients in the intervention arm, 31% were at the highest level of patient activation compared to 19% of those in the control arm (V = 0.18). In 82% of decisions, the oncologist agreed that the patient-reported data helped them engage in SDM. In 45% of decision, they reported changing management due to patient-reported data. CONCLUSIONS: Oncologist engagement in the treatment planning process, with oncologist review of patient-reported data, is a promising approach to improve patient participation in treatment decisions which should be tested in larger studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03806738.

A Review of Artificial Intelligence Application for Radiotherapy.

Background and Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) is a technique which tries to think like humans and mimic human behaviors. It has been considered as an alternative in a lot of human-dependent steps in radiotherapy (RT), since the human participation is a principal uncertainty source in RT. The aim of this work is to provide a systematic summary of the current literature on AI application for RT, and to clarify its role for RT practice in terms of clinical views. Materials and Methods: A systematic literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar was performed to identify original articles involving the AI applications in RT from the inception to 2022. Studies were included if they reported original data and explored the clinical applications of AI in RT. Results: The selected studies were categorized into three aspects of RT: organ and lesion segmentation, treatment planning and quality assurance. For each aspect, this review discussed how these AI tools could be involved in the RT protocol. Conclusions: Our study revealed that AI was a potential alternative for the human-dependent steps in the complex process of RT.

FET PET-based target volume delineation for the radiotherapy of glioblastoma: A pictorial guide to help overcome methodological pitfalls.

PET is increasingly used for target volume definition in the radiotherapy of glioblastoma, as endorsed by the 2023 ESTRO-EANO guidelines. In view of its growing adoption into clinical practice and upcoming PET-based multi-center trials, this paper aims to assist in overcoming common pitfalls of FET PET-based target delineation in glioblastoma.