RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chronic facial pain is considered one of the conditions that affect quality of daily life of patients significantly and makes them seek medical help. Intractable facial pain with failed trials of medical treatment and other pain management therapies presents a challenge for neurologists, pain specialists, and neurosurgeons. We describe the possibility of proposing peripheral nerve stimulation of the supraorbital nerves to treat patients with medically intractable facial pain. Stimulation of the supraorbital nerves is performed using percutaneously inserted electrodes that are positioned in the epi-fascial plane, traversing the course of the supraorbital nerves. The procedure has two phases starting with a trial by temporary electrodes that are inserted under fluoroscopic guidance and are anchored to the skin. This trial usually lasts for a few days to 2 weeks. If successful, we proceed to the insertion of a permanent electrode that is tunneled under the skin behind the ear toward the infraclavicular region in which we make a pocket for the implantable pulse generator. RECENT FINDINGS: This procedure has been used in multiple patients with promising results which was published in literature. Literature shows that it provides relief of medically intractable pain, without the need for destructive procedures or more central modulation approaches with a preferable safety profile compared to other invasive procedures. Supraorbital nerve stimulation is now considered a valid modality of treatment for patients with medically intractable facial pain and can be offered as a reliable alternative for the patients while discussing the proper plan of management.
Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Dor Intratável , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea , Humanos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Dor Facial/terapia , Manejo da Dor , Dor Intratável/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Peripheral neurostimulation (PNS) for medically refractory trigeminal pain is an emerging alternative to traditional surgical approaches, with safety and efficacy demonstrated in several retrospective series and a prospective trial currently in progress. Many existing studies suffer from relatively small numbers and short or inconsistent follow-up, making balanced treatment assessment difficult. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive cases of trial and permanent placement of trigeminal branch stimulation electrodes by a single surgeon from May 2014 through January 2019 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected database, following the PROCESS guidelines for surgical case series. Outcomes were assessed at six months and at last follow-up. RESULTS: Ninteen patients underwent trial electrode placement, with 15 patients undergoing permanent system placement. The most common diagnoses were idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia Type 2 (N = 8) and trigeminal neuropathic pain (N = 7). Median follow-up was 14 months (range 6-58 months). At last follow-up, 12 of 15 implanted patients (80%) were still receiving stimulation, with mean (median) pain reduction of 52.3% (47.5%). Infection and revision rates were high, although erosion and migration, which have typically plagued trigeminal PNS surgery, did not occur. Implanted systems were well-tolerated, with excellent cosmetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction that proved durable over long follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We present a single-institution series of PNS for complex craniofacial pain involving the trigeminal nerve. The procedure is safe, effective and durable over at least one year in the large majority of a well-selected patient population.
Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Neuralgia/terapia , Nervo Trigêmeo , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Eletrodos Implantados , Seguimentos , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Peripheral neurostimulation (PNS) for medically refractory trigeminal and craniofacial pain is an emerging alternative to traditional surgical approaches. Technical problems with craniofacial PNS have included electrode migration and erosion, limiting the utility and cost-effectiveness of this procedure. OBJECTIVE: To review our institutional surgical technique for trigeminal PNS implantation, focusing on a novel technique for electrode anchoring. METHODS: Consecutive cases of permanent craniofacial PNS placement by a single surgeon over 36 months were reviewed for surgical technique and technical outcomes. Electrodes were placed percutaneously with open anchoring to the pericranium at a separate parietal incision. RESULTS: Sixteen systems (53 electrodes) were implanted in 14 patients. Median follow-up was 13 months (range, 5-29 months). Electrode placement was successful in all cases with no intraoperative complications. There was 1 lead migration (6.3% per patient; 1.8% per lead) and no cases of erosion. Two patients (14.3%) required explant for infection, 1 of whom was successfully reimplanted. Three patients (21.4%) underwent surgical revision other than for infection. CONCLUSIONS: We present an improved method for craniofacial PNS surgery which introduces a separate incision for electrode anchoring at the parietal boss. This technique simplifies the procedure and greatly reduces rates of erosion and migration, improving patient comfort and satisfaction.