Secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with low dose apixaban or rivaroxaban in major-thrombophilia carriers.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and represent the gold standard for VTE secondary prophylaxis, with low-intensity DOACs administration becoming increasingly used worldwide in such scenario. Albeit widespread DOACs usage there are few literature data regarding their efficacy and safety in major thrombophilia carriers and almost no data is available for low intensity apixaban and rivaroxaban as secondary VTE prophylaxis in such patients. The aim of our study is to evaluate and confront the efficacy and safety of low-dose DOACs for VTE secondary prophylaxis, in major thrombophilia carriers vs patients at high risk of VTE recurrence for other reasons. We retrospectively evaluated patients who required long-term anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrent VTE, treated with apixaban 2.5 mg BID or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily and that were screened for thrombophilia. The examined patients were 339. Baseline characteristics such as sex, age, obesity rate, smoking, number of previous VTEs and comorbidities (such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, mild CKD) were equally distributed in either group. The median low-dose DOACs administration time was 19.20 months (IQR 12.17-35.67). During low-dose DOACs treatment, 13 (3.8%) VTE recurrences were observed; 14 bleeding events were registered (4,1%), with no major bleeding (MB), 6 clinically relevant non major bleeding (CRNMB) (1.8%) and 8 minor bleeding (2.3%). No statistically significant difference in the rate of VTE recurrence and/or bleeding events emerged between major thrombophilia carriers and non-major thrombophilia carriers. In multivariate analysis increased risk of VTE recurrence was found for patients with cardiovascular comorbidities (HR 4.00 - p = 0.034) and for patients with more than one previous VTE episode (HR 5.14 - p = 0.034). Our data suggest that low-dose DOACs may be effective and safe in secondary VTE prophylaxis for carriers of major thrombophilia with no increase in VTE recurrence and/or bleeding risk.

Secondary Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) with Low Dose Apixaban or Rivaroxaban: Results from a Patient Population with More than 2 Years of Median Follow-up.

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Nowadays, DOACs represent the gold standard for long-term anticoagulation, with low-intensity DOACs administration becoming increasingly used worldwide in such scenario. Albeit low-intensity apixaban and rivaroxaban are approved for clinical usage as secondary VTE prophylaxis, there are few literature data regarding their efficacy and safety with a long follow-up. Objectives: The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose DOACs for VTE secondary prophylaxis in patients at high risk of VTE recurrence. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who required long-term anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrent VTE, treated with apixaban 2.5 mg BID or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily with a follow-up ≥ 12 months. Results: The examined patients were 323. The median low-dose DOAC administration time was 25.40 months (IQR 13.93-45.90). Twelve (3.7%) VTE recurrences were observed; 21 bleeding events were registered (6.5%), including one episode of Major bleeding (MB) (0.3%), 8 Clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) (2.5%) and 12 minor bleeding (3.7%). No statistically significant difference in the rate of VTE recurrence and/or bleeding events emerged between the rivaroxaban and apixaban groups. Patients included in the study for multiple episodes of VTE presented a significantly higher risk of a new VTE recurrence during low-intensity DOAC. Conclusions: Our data suggest that low-dose DOACs may be effective and safe in secondary VTE prophylaxis in patients at high risk of VTE recurrence; however, attention might be needed in their choice in such a scenario for patients who experienced multiple episodes of VTE.

Secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism with direct oral anticoagulants: comparison between patients with major congenital thrombophilia versus non-thrombophilic patients.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Congenital thrombophilia is a condition that predisposes to a higher incidence of VTE and often requires long-term anticoagulation for secondary prophylaxis. It is less clear the efficacy of DOACs in patients with major thrombophilia. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of full and reduced DOACs dose for VTE secondary prophylaxis, in patients affected by major congenital thrombophilia compared to a control group of patients with idiopathic recurrent VTE without thrombophilia. We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who required long-term anticoagulation for recurrent VTE, treated with DOACs, and compared the outcomes between patients affected by major thrombophilia and the control group. The examined patients were 209. The median time of DOACs therapy was 20 months (range 6-90). Two (2.7%) thrombotic events were observed in the subset affected by major congenital thrombophilia (n = 72) and five (3.6%) in the control group (n = 137) (p 0.73). Four (5.5%) hemorrhagic events were reported in the group with major thrombophilia; 21 (15.3%) in the other group (p 0.039). No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of efficacy and safety between DOACs at full and reduced dose. Our data suggest that DOACs may be effective and safe in the secondary VTE prophylaxis in patients affected by major congenital thrombophilia, also at reduced dose.