RESUMO
Purpose: Approximately 50-74% of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer do not respond to trastuzumab, with 75% of treated patients experiencing disease progression within a year. The combination of pyrotinib and capecitabine has showed efficacy in these patients. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib combined with metronomic vinorelbine for trastuzumab-pretreated HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients. Materials and Methods: In this phase 2 trial, patients aged 18-75 years with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer who had previously failed trastuzumab treatment were enrolled to receive pyrotinib 400mg daily in combination with vinorelbine 40mg thrice weekly. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: From October 21, 2019, to January 21, 2022, 36 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment. At the cut-off date, 20 experienced disease progression or death. With a median follow-up duration of 35 months, the median PFS was 13.5 months (95% CI: 8.3-18.5). With all patients evaluated, an ORR of 38.9% (95% CI: 23.1-56.5%) and a DCR of 83.3% (95% CI: 67.2-93.6%) were achieved. The median OS was not reached. Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) were observed in 17 patients, with diarrhea being the most common (27.8%), followed by vomiting (8.3%) and stomachache (5.6%). There were no grade 4/5 AEs. Conclusion: Pyrotinib combined with metronomic vinorelbine showed promising efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients after trastuzumab failure.
RESUMO
Vinorelbine is a commonly used drug to treat various malignancies, such as breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and metastatic pleural mesothelioma. Its side effects include severe neutropenia, local phlebitis, gastrointestinal reactions, and neurotoxicity. In view of the scarcity of research on vinorelbine's reproductive toxicity, this study evaluated the impact of vinorelbine ditartrate, a commonly used form of vinorelbine, on oocyte maturation in vitro. Our investigation revealed that vinorelbine ditartrate had no effect on oocyte meiotic resumption. However, it did reduce the rate of first polar body extrusion, suggesting that it could significantly impede the meiotic maturation of oocytes. Vinorelbine ditartrate exposure was found to disturb the regular spindle assembly and chromosome alignment, leading to the continuous activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) and a delayed activation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), ultimately causing aneuploidy in oocytes. Consequently, the administration of vinorelbine is likely to result in oocyte aneuploidy, which can be helpful in providing a drug reference and fertility guidance in a clinical context.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse reactions of metronomic oral vinorelbine and its combination therapy as second- and later-line regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: NSCLC patients undergoing metronomic oral vinorelbine as second- and later-line regimens in Fujian Cancer Hospital from October 2018 to October 2022 were enrolled, and patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. The efficacy and safety of metronomic oral vinorelbine monotherapy and its combination therapy regimens were compared. RESULTS: Of 57 study subjects, 63.2% received third- and later-line therapy, with median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 4 months, overall response rate (ORR) of 10.5%, and disease control rate (DCR) of 80.7%. The incidence of therapy-related adverse events was 42.1%, and there was only one case presenting grades 3 and 4 adverse events (1.8%). Among driver gene-negative participants, vinorelbine combination therapy regimens achieved longer mPFS (4.6 vs. 1.2 months, hazards ratio = 0.11, P < 0.0001) and comparable toxicity in relative to metronomic oral vinorelbine, and metronomic oral vinorelbine combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors showed the highest response, with mPFS of 5.6 months (95% CI 4.8 to 6.4 months), ORR of 25%, and DCR of 81.3%. Among participants with gradual resistance to osimertinib, continuing osimertinib in combination with metronomic oral vinorelbine achieved mPFS of 6.3 months (95% CI 0.1 to 12.5 months) and DCR of 86.7%. CONCLUSION: Metronomic oral vinorelbine and its combination therapy regimens are favorable options as second- and later-line therapy for advanced NSCLC patients, with acceptable efficacy and tolerable toxicity. Vinorelbine combination therapy regimens show higher efficacy and comparable toxicity in relative to metronomic oral vinorelbine, and metronomic oral vinorelbine may have a synergistic effect with immunotherapy and EGFR-TKI targeted therapy.
RESUMO
Daratumumab is being increasingly integrated into first-line multiple myeloma (MM) induction regimens, leading to improved response depth and longer progression-free survival. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is commonly performed as a consolidation strategy following first-line induction in fit MM patients. We investigated a cohort of 155 MM patients who received ASCT after first-line induction with or without daratumumab (RVd, n = 110; D-RVd, n = 45), analyzing differences in stem cell mobilization, apheresis, and engraftment. In the D-RVd group, fewer patients successfully completed mobilization at the planned apheresis date (44% vs. 71%, p = 0.0029), and more patients required the use of rescue plerixafor (38% vs. 28%, p = 0.3052). The median count of peripheral CD34+ cells at apheresis was lower (41.37 vs. 52.19 × 106/L, p = 0.0233), and the total number of collected CD34+ cells was inferior (8.27 vs. 10.22 × 106/kg BW, p = 0.0139). The time to recovery of neutrophils and platelets was prolonged (12 vs. 11 days, p = 0.0164; and 16 vs. 14 days, p = 0.0002, respectively), and a higher frequency of erythrocyte transfusions (74% vs. 51%, p = 0.0103) and a higher number of platelet concentrates/patients were required (4 vs. 2; p = 0.001). The use of daratumumab during MM induction might negatively impact stem cell mobilization and engraftment in the context of ASCT.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Apatinib is an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that blocks vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. Oral vinorelbine is a semisynthetic chemotherapeutic agent of vinorelbine alkaloids. Apatinib and oral vinorelbine have been proved to be effective in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC). At present, several small sample clinical trials have explored the efficacy of apatinib combined with oral vinorelbine in the treatment of mBC. METHODS: This retrospective study included 100 human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative mBC patients who received low-dose apatinib (250 mg orally per day) plus oral vinorelbine until disease progression or intolerance during February 2017 and March 2023. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were analyzed by SPSS 26.0 software and GraphPad Prism 8 software. Cox proportional hazards regression model for univariate and multivariate was used to identify factors significantly related to PFS and OS. RESULTS: The median follow-up time for this study was 38.1 months. Among 100 patients with HER2-negative mBC, 66 were hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative and 34 were triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The median PFS and OS were 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.2-6.8 months) and 23.0 months (95% CI, 19.9-26.1 months). There were no statistical differences in PFS (p = 0.239) and OS (p = 0.762) between the HR-positive /HER2-negative and TNBC subgroups. The ORR, CBR, and DCR were 21.0%, 58.0%, and 78.0%, respectively. Ninety-five patients (95.0%) experienced varying grades of adverse events (AEs) and 38.0% of patients for Grades 3-4. The most common Grades 3-4 AEs that we observed were neutropenia (30.0%) and leukopenia (25.0%). CONCLUSION: Low-dose apatinib combined with oral vinorelbine demonstrates potential efficacy and well tolerated for pretreated HER2-negative mBC.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias da Mama , Piridinas , Receptor ErbB-2 , Vinorelbina , Humanos , Feminino , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Vinorelbina/administração & dosagem , Vinorelbina/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Administração Oral , Intervalo Livre de ProgressãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women, primarily attributed to the formidable challenge of multidrug resistance, often driven by the overexpression of the ABCB1 gene. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the synergistic effects of siRNA, doxorubicin, and vinorelbine on ABCB1 gene expression and cell viability in doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7/ADR breast cancer cells, with siRNA targeting ABCB1 to reduce its expression and doxorubicin/ vinorelbine to eradicate cancer cells. METHODS: Our methodology involved culturing MCF-7 and MCF-7/ADR cells in standard cell culture conditions. The synthesized siRNA sequences transfected cells with siRNA at final concentrations of 10, 20, and 30 nM and assessed cell viability using the MTT assay was performed. Real-time PCR was employed to quantify ABCB1 mRNA expression levels. RESULTS: Results indicated that MCF-7/ADR cells exhibited substantial resistance to vinorelbine and doxorubicin compared to MCF-7 cells, displaying resistance at 12.50 µM and 25.00 µM for vinorelbine and 6.25 µM and 25.00 µM for doxorubicin. Remarkably, siRNA treatment effectively reversed drug resistance in MCF-7/ADR cells across all concentrations of vinorelbine and doxorubicin tested. When combined, siRNA, doxorubicin, and vinorelbine yielded a significantly greater reduction in cell viability compared to individual drug treatments, particularly at a 20 µM siRNA concentration. This combination therapy also significantly suppressed ABCB1 gene expression by a factor of 41.48 in MCF-7 cells relative to MCF-7/ADR cells. CONCLUSION: these findings suggest that combining siRNA, doxorubicin, and vinorelbine holds promise as a therapeutic strategy to overcome ABCB1-mediated multidrug resistance in breast cancer. Further investigations and clinical trials are warranted to evaluate its clinical efficacy rigorously.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is a fatal disease associated with a median survival of < 1 year despite aggressive treatments. This retrospective study analyzed the treatment outcomes of patients aged < 18 years who were diagnosed with DIPG between 2012 and 2022 and who received different chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: After radiotherapy, patients with DIPG received nimotuzumab-vinorelbine combination or temozolomide-containing therapy. When nimotuzumab was unavailable, it was replaced by vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin/cyclophosphamide (VECC). Temozolomide was administered as a single agent or a part of the combination chemotherapy comprising temozolomide, irinotecan, and bevacizumab. Furthermore, 1- and 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and median OS and PFS were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age of 40 patients with DIPG was 97 ± 46.93 (23-213) months; the median follow-up time was 12 months. One and 3-year OS were 35.0% and 7.5%, respectively. Median OS was 12 months in all patients (n = 40), and it was 16, 10, and 11 months in those who received first-line nimotuzumab-vinorelbine combination (n = 13), temozolomide-based (n = 14), and VECC (n = 6) chemotherapy regimens, respectively (p = 0.360). One patient who received gefitinib survived for 16 months. Conversely, patients who never received radiotherapy and any antineoplastic medicamentous therapy (n = 6) had a median OS of 4 months. CONCLUSION: Nimotuzumab-vinorelbine combination therapy prolonged OS by 6 months compared with temozolomide-containing chemotherapy, although the difference was not statistically significant.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico , Glioma Pontino Intrínseco Difuso , Humanos , Feminino , Criança , Masculino , Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico/tratamento farmacológico , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Glioma Pontino Intrínseco Difuso/tratamento farmacológico , Temozolomida/uso terapêutico , Temozolomida/administração & dosagem , Vimblastina/administração & dosagem , Vimblastina/uso terapêutico , Vimblastina/análogos & derivados , Lactente , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is responsible for 10-20% cases of breast cancer and is resulting in rising healthcare costs. Thus, health-economic evaluations are needed to relate clinical outcomes and costs of treatment options and to provide recommendations of action from a health-economic perspective. METHODS: We investigated the cost-benefit-ratio of approved treatment options in metastatic TNBC in Germany by applying the efficiency frontier approach. These included sacituzumab-govitecan (SG), eribulin, vinorelbine, and capecitabine. Clinical benefit was measured as (i) median overall survival (mOS) and (ii) health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in terms of time to symptom worsening (TSW). To assess medical benefits, literature was systematically reviewed in PubMed for (i) and (ii), respectively. Treatment costs were calculated considering annual direct outpatient treatment costs from a statutory healthcare payer perspective. It was intended that both, (i) and (ii), yield an efficiency frontier. RESULTS: Annual direct outpatient treatment costs amounted to EUR 176,415.21 (SG), EUR 47,414.14 (eribulin), EUR 13,711.35 (vinorelbine), and EUR 3,718.84 (capecitabine). Systematic literature review of (i) and statistical analysis resulted in OS values of 14.3, 9.56, 9.44, and 7.46 months, respectively. Capecitabine, vinorelbine, and SG are part of the efficiency frontier including OS. The highest additional benefit per additional cost was determined for vinorelbine, followed by SG. Systematic review of (ii) revealed that no TSW data of TNBC patients receiving vinorelbine were available, preventing the presentation of an efficiency frontier including HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: Vinorelbine is most cost-effective, followed by SG. Health-economic evaluations support decision-makers to assess treatment options within one indication area. In Germany, the efficiency frontier can provide decision support for the pricing of innovative interventions. Results of our analysis may thus guide reimbursement determination.
RESUMO
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading global cause of cancer-related mortality. Despite the widespread adoption of sorafenib as the standard HCC treatment, its efficacy is constrained, frequently encountering resistance. To augment the effectiveness of sorafenib, this study investigated the synergy of sorafenib and vinorelbine using 22 HCC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. In this study, mice bearing HCC tumors were treated with the vehicle, sorafenib (15 mg/kg), vinorelbine (3 mg/kg), and sorafenib-vinorelbine combination (Sora/Vino). Rigorous monitoring of the tumor growth and side effects coupled with comprehensive histological and molecular analyses was conducted. The overall survival (OS) of mice bearing HCC orthotopic tumors was also assessed. Our data showed a notable 86.4% response rate to Sora/Vino, surpassing rates of 31.8% for sorafenib and 9.1% for vinorelbine monotherapies. Sora/Vino significantly inhibited tumor growth, prolonged OS of mice bearing HCC orthotopic tumors (p < 0.01), attenuated tumor cell proliferation and angiogenesis, and enhanced necrosis and apoptosis. The combination therapy effectively suppressed the focal adhesion kinase (FAK) pathway, which is a pivotal player in cell proliferation, tumor angiogenesis, survival, and metastasis. The noteworthy antitumor activity in 22 HCC PDX models positions Sora/Vino as a promising candidate for early-phase clinical trials, leveraging the established use of sorafenib and vinorelbine in HCC and other cancers.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Animais , Camundongos , Sorafenibe/farmacologia , Sorafenibe/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/metabolismo , Vinorelbina/farmacologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/metabolismo , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Apoptose , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Proliferação de Células , Ensaios Antitumorais Modelo de Xenoenxerto , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted agents have significantly improved the outcomes of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer; however, a large proportion of patients still develop resistance to trastuzumab. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of inetetamab, another anti-HER2 antibody, combined with pyrotinib and oral vinorelbine in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer so as to provide new ideas for the treatment. Methods: In this prospective, single-arm, phase 2 trial, patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer with disease progression after trastuzumab were recruited. Patients received a combination of inetetamab (loading dose of 8 mg/kg and subsequent doses of 6 mg/kg intravenously once every 3 weeks), pyrotinib (400 mg orally once daily), and vinorelbine (60 mg/m2 orally once weekly) until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results: Between February 13, 2022 and December 25, 2022, 30 patients were screened and enrolled in this study. The median age of the patients at enrollment was 54 years, 12 patients (40.0 %) had hormone-receptor-positive disease and 23 patients (76.7 %) had visceral metastasis. The median PFS was 8.63 months (95 % confidence interval [CI] 4.15-13.12 months). The median OS was not reached. The ORR was 53.3 % (16/30) and the DCR was 96.7 % (29/30). The most common Grade III/IV adverse events were leukopenia (n = 5, 16.7 %), neutropenia (n = 4, 13.3 %), and diarrhea (n = 3, 10 %). No treatment-related serious adverse events or deaths occurred. Conclusions: The combination regimen of inetetamab, pyrotinib, and oral vinorelbine showed encouraging efficacy and favorable safety in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer and could be considered as an alternative treatment option for the patients. Trial registration: No.NCT05823623; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Single-agent oral vinorelbine is a standard of care for hormone receptor (HR)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) that has progressed on endocrine therapy. Metronomic administration may offer a better balance of efficacy and safety than standard regimens, but data from previous trials are scarce. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter, phase II trial, patients were randomized to oral vinorelbine administered on a metronomic (50 mg three times weekly) or weekly (60 mg/m2 in cycle 1, increasing to 80 mg/m2 if well tolerated) schedule. Treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerance. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR, the proportion of patients with a best overall confirmed response of CR, PR, or stable disease lasting 6 months or more). RESULTS: One-hundred sixty-three patients were randomized and treated. The DCR was 63.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.0-73.8) with metronomic vinorelbine and 72.8% (95% CI: 61.8-82.1) with weekly vinorelbine. Weekly vinorelbine was also associated with longer progression-free survival (5.6 vs 4.0 months) and overall survival (26.7 vs 22.3 months) than metronomic vinorelbine, but was associated with more adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized phase II trial, single-agent metronomic oral vinorelbine was effective and well tolerated as first-line chemotherapy for patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative ABC. Formal comparisons are not done in this phase II study and one can simply observe that confidence intervals of all endpoints overlap. When deciding for a chemotherapy after failure of endocrine therapy and CDK 4/6 inhibitors, oral vinorelbine might be an option to be given with either schedule. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2014-003860-19.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Vinorelbina , Mama/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Administração Metronômica , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Resultado do Tratamento , VimblastinaRESUMO
Identification of the optimal treatment strategy is challenging in elderly with localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Concurrent chemotherapy with low-dose cisplatin represents an option for elderly. Outcomes (1) in elderly (≥70 years, n = 158) vs. younger patients (n = 188) and (2), independently of age, in definitive radiochemotherapy, with low-dose cisplatin (n = 125) vs. cisplatin/vinorelbine (n = 76) were studied. Elderly included more males, had a lower Karnofsky index, more comorbidities, and lower stages. Low-dose cisplatin patients (vs. cisplatin/vinorelbine) had higher age, more comorbidities, and lower stages. We observed reduced dermatitis and dysphagia and increased anemia and thrombocytopenia in elderly vs. younger patients, without increased ≥grade 3 toxicities. Low-dose cisplatin was less toxic than cisplatin/vinorelbine. Survival outcomes were lower in elderly vs. younger and comparable between low-dose cisplatin and cisplatin/vinorelbine. In elderly, gender, Karnofsky index, stage, and multimodal treatment (including additional surgery/systemic therapy) were identified as prognostic factors. In conclusion, we found evidence for an acceptable toxicity profile and the need for improvement of outcomes in elderly with localized NSCLC. Multimodal strategies (including additional surgery/systemic treatment) showed favorable outcomes and should be reasonably considered in elderly who are deemed fit enough. Low-dose cisplatin should be discussed on an individual basis due to favorable toxicity and outcomes.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new combination treatment of vinorelbine and pyrotinib in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and provide higher level evidence for clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 trial conducted at three institutions in China. Patients with HER2-positive MBC, who had previously been treated with trastuzumab plus a taxane or trastuzumab plus pertuzumab combined with a chemotherapeutic agent, were enrolled between March 2020 and December 2021. All patients received pyrotinib 400 mg orally once daily plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 intravenously or 60-80 mg/m2 orally on day 1 and day 8 of 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were enrolled. All patients had been pretreated with trastuzumab and 23.1% (n=9) of them had accepted trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. The median follow-up time was 16.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.3 to 27.2), and the median PFS was 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 8.8). The ORR was 43.6% (95% CI, 27.8% to 60.4%) and the DCR was 84.6% (95% CI, 69.5% to 94.1%). The median PFS of patients with versus without prior pertuzumab treatment was 4.6 and 8.3 months (p=0.017). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were diarrhea (28.2%), neutrophil count decreased (15.4%), white blood cell count decreased (7.7%), vomiting (5.1%), and anemia (2.6%). CONCLUSION: Pyrotinib plus vinorelbine showed promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity as second-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive MBC.
Assuntos
Acrilamidas , Aminoquinolinas , Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Vinorelbina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Trastuzumab/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is evidence that the empirical setting of doses and schedules of antineoplastic agents in metronomic chemotherapy (MC) might lead to undesirable outcomes, such as promoting tumor growth or metastasis at certain low doses. However, details about the dose effect of antineoplastic agents in MC have not been fully known yet. OBJECTIVES: Vinorelbine combined with cisplatin or fluorouracil (VNR/CDDP or VNR/FU) was selected to investigate its effects on tumor growth or metastasis as well as mechanisms. METHODS: Experimental techniques, including immunohistochemistry, western blot, immunofluorescence, and flow cytometry, were used to explore the mechanisms, along with cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion. RESULTS: The results showed that VNR/CDDP or VNR/FU promoted tumor growth and metastasis at low doses and inhibited them at high ones. Except that expressions of apoptotic proteins were elevated at both low and high doses, low-dose treatments enhanced angiogenesis and promoted the mobilization and recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), while high-dose treatments reversed these effects. Additionally, low concentrations of VNR/CDDP or VNR/FU stimulated tumor cell functions such as anti-apoptosis, migration, and invasion, but high concentrations only suppressed cell proliferation and increased apoptosis. CONCLUSION: This study elucidated a bidirectional action mode regulated by multiple mechanisms at different doses in MC and also highlighted the risks of low-dose metronomic administration of antineoplastic agents in the clinic. More preclinical and clinical studies focusing on the dose-effect of metronomic regimens are urgently needed because an effective therapeutic regimen should be an optimal setting of drugs, doses, schedules, or combinations.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Melanoma , Animais , Camundongos , Vinorelbina/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Vimblastina/farmacologia , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Cisplatino/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologiaRESUMO
Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) regimens may be associated with risks to the patient due to the ambiguity surrounding low dosages and schedules. In the present study, metronomic regimens of vinorelbine (NVB) combined with cisplatin (CDDP) or fluorouracil (5FU) were chosen to study the doseresponse associations with tumor growth and metastasis, along with the underlying mechanisms in angiogenesis, apoptosis and tumor immunity, using experimental techniques such as immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry, western blotting and flow cytometry. The results demonstrated a dualdirectional pharmacological action of promoting and suppressing tumor growth or metastasis in BALB/c mice bearing a 4T1 tumor at certain low and high doses of the drugs. Low doses of NVB combined with CDDP or 5FU accelerated tumor growth by enhancing angiogenesis, increasing the expression of angiogenic proteins, NFκB and osteopontin in tumor tissues, and inducing the accumulation of myeloidderived suppressor cells and macrophages. By contrast, higher doses inhibited tumor growth by suppressing these effects. Notably, the upregulation of apoptotic proteins was observed after low and highdose treatments. Furthermore, at low concentrations, NVB combined with CDDP or 5FU stimulated certain functions of endothelial and tumor cells, including migration and invasion, whereas at higher concentrations they suppressed proliferation and induced apoptosis. Therefore, the results of the present study suggested the potential risks of metronomic combination chemotherapy by demonstrating that, at certain low doses, tumor growth or metastasis was promoted, and emphasized the existence of an effective dose interval that changes with different drug combinations. However, further studies are needed before a specific metronomic combination regimen can be administered clinically for cancer treatment.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Camundongos , Animais , Humanos , Feminino , Vinorelbina , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Fluoruracila , Cisplatino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Administração MetronômicaRESUMO
The regimen of afatinib and vinorelbine has been used to treat breast or lung cancer cells with some limitations. Aspirin alone or in combination with other agents has shown unique efficacy in the treatment of cancer. We designed a preclinical study to investigate whether the triple therapy of aspirin, afatinib, and vinorelbine could synergistically inhibit the growth of p53 wild-type nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Three NSCLC cells A549, H460, and H1975 were selected to study the effect of triple therapy on cell proliferation and apoptosis. Compared to single agents, triple therapy synergistically inhibited the proliferation of lung cancer cells with combination index <1. Meanwhile, the therapeutic index of triple therapy was superior to that of single agents, indicating a balance between efficacy and safety in the combination of three agents. Mechanistic studies showed that triple therapy significantly induced apoptosis by decreasing mitochondrial membrane potential, increasing reactive oxygen species, and regulating mitochondria-related proteins. Moreover, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) downstream signaling proteins including JNK, AKT, and mTOR were dramatically suppressed and p53 was substantially increased after NSCLC cells were exposed to the triple therapy. We provided evidence that the triple therapy of aspirin, afatinib and vinorelbine synergistically inhibited lung cancer cell growth through inactivation of the EGFR/AKT/mTOR pathway and accumulation of p53, providing a new treatment strategy for patients with p53 wild-type NSCLC.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/metabolismo , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/metabolismo , Afatinib/farmacologia , Afatinib/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-akt/metabolismo , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53 , Vinorelbina/farmacologia , Vinorelbina/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/farmacologia , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo , Serina-Treonina Quinases TOR/metabolismo , Proliferação de Células , Apoptose , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacologia , Resistencia a Medicamentos AntineoplásicosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Metastatic breast cancer refractory to anthracycline and taxanes often shows rapid progression. The development of effective and tolerable combination regimens for these patients is needed. This phase II trial investigated the efficacy of pemetrexed plus vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: This randomized, open-label, phase II trial was conducted in 17 centers in Korea. Patients with advanced breast cancer who had previously been treated with anthracyclines and taxanes were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vinorelbine or pemetrexed plus vinorelbine. Randomization was stratified by prior capecitabine treatment and hormone receptor status. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate, overall survival, safety, and quality of life. RESULTS: Between March 2017 and August 2019, a total of 125 patients were enrolled. After a median follow-up duration of 14.1 months, 118 progression events and 88 death events had occurred. Sixty-two patients were assigned to the pemetrexed plus vinorelbine arm, and 63 were assigned to the vinorelbine arm. Pemetrexed plus vinorelbine significantly prolonged PFS compared to vinorelbine (5.7 vs. 1.5 months, p < 0.001). The combination arm had higher disease control rate (76.8% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.001) and a tendency toward longer overall survival (16.8 vs. 10.5 months, p = 0.102). Anemia was more frequent in the pemetrexed plus vinorelbine arm per cycle compared with vinorelbine (7.9% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001), but there was no difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia per cycle between the pemetrexed plus vinorelbine arm and the vinorelbine single arm (14.7% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.066). CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study showed that pemetrexed plus vinorelbine led to a longer PFS than vinorelbine. Adverse events of pemetrexed plus vinorelbine were generally manageable.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Pemetrexede , Vinorelbina , Feminino , Humanos , Antraciclinas/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Pemetrexede/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Vinorelbina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as the most common type. In addition, NSCLC has a high mortality rate and an overall adverse patient outcome. Although significant improvements have been made in therapeutic options, effectiveness is still limited in late stages, so the need for a better understanding of the genomics events underlying the current therapies is crucial to aid future drug development. Vinorelbine (VRB) is an anti-mitotic chemotherapy drug (third-generation vinca alkaloid) used to treat several malignancies, including NSCLC. However, despite its widespread clinical use, very little is known about VRB-associated genomic alterations in different subtypes of NSCLC. This article is an in vitro investigation of the cytotoxic effects of VRB on three different types of NSCLC cell lines, A549, Calu-6, and H1792, with a closer focus on post-treatment genetic alterations. Based on the obtained results, VRB cytotoxicity produces modifications on a cellular level, altering biological processes such as apoptosis, autophagy, cellular motility, cellular adhesion, and cell cycle, but also at a genomic level, dysregulating the expression of some coding genes, such as EGFR, and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), including CCAT1, CCAT2, GAS5, MALAT1, NEAT1, NORAD, XIST, and HOTAIR, that are implicated in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. Therefore, although extensive validation is required, these results pave the way towards a better understanding of the cellular and genomic alterations underlying the cytotoxicity of VRB.
RESUMO
Vinorelbine (VRL), a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid commonly used in humans with advanced lung cancer, reaches high concentrations in the lung tissue, has proven antineoplastic activity and a low toxicity profile in dogs. Treatment-naïve, client-owned dogs with a cyto/histological diagnosis of advanced pulmonary carcinoma, selected from a laboratory database and previously subjected to imaging, were enrolled in the study. Vinorelbine (15 mg/m2) was administered weekly for 4 weeks and then fortnightly until progressive disease was documented. Staging work-up was repeated by means of diagnostic imaging after the fourth VRL (i.e., 28 days) and monthly thereafter; response to treatment was evaluated according to the RECIST. Toxicity was graded following the VCOGC group. Ten dogs met the inclusion criteria. Partial response was documented in eight dogs. Median time to progression was 88 days (range: 7-112) and median survival time for all dogs was 100 days (range 7-635). The most common side effect was neutropenia. The main limitations of the study were the absence of histological diagnosis in eight cases and the limited number of treated dogs. VRL is well tolerated with an adequate toxicity profile and may be useful in the management of advanced lung tumours if used as a first-line treatment strategy.