Primary mode of communication for people with total laryngectomy in the UK: a cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report on the UK rate of surgical voice restoration usage and investigate the factors that influence its uptake. METHOD: A national multicentre audit of people with total laryngectomy was completed over a six-month period (March to September 2020) in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. This study is a secondary analysis of the data collected, focusing on the primary communication methods used by people with total laryngectomy. RESULTS: Data on surgical voice restoration were available for 1196 people with total laryngectomy; a total of 852 people with total laryngectomy (71 per cent) used surgical voice restoration. Another type of communication method was used by 344 people. The factors associated with surgical voice restoration in the multiple regression analysis were sex (p = 0.003), employment (employed vs not employed, p < 0.001) and time post-laryngectomy (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study provides an important benchmark for the current status of surgical voice restoration usage across the UK. It found that 71 per cent of people with total laryngectomy used surgical voice restoration as their primary communication method.

Dysphagia as a predictor of voice handicap and voice restoration in unilateral vocal fold immobility.

OBJECTIVE: Dysphagia is multifactorial in unilateral vocal fold immobility (UVFI). Severe dysphagia could indicate greater functional deficits in UVFI. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association of dysphagia with the need for surgical voice restoration in patients with UVFI. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Single-institution, tertiary referral center. METHODS: Records of UVFI patients from 2008 to 2018 were examined. Dysphagia severity was extracted from patient history. Etiology of UVFI and other relevant variables were analyzed to determine their association with dysphagia. Dysphagia severity and other clinical variables were then analyzed for their association with surgical voice restoration. RESULTS: Eighty patients met selection criteria out of 478 patients with UVFI. There was significant concordance between dysphagia severity extracted from patient history and patient-reported EAT-10 scores (R = 0.59, p = 0.000035). Patients' EAT-10 scores were correlated with VHI-10 scores (R = 0.45, p = 0.011). Severe dysphagia (p = 0.037), high VHI-10 score on presentation (p = 0.0009), and longer duration of hoarseness before presentation (p = 0.008) were associated with surgical voice restoration in UVFI patients. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, severe dysphagia and increased voice handicap on presentation were associated with the need for surgical voice restoration in UVFI patients. Presenting dysphagia may be an additional variable for clinicians to consider for management of UVFI.

The impact of COVID-19 on head and neck cancer patients: A review of speech valve complications and patient experience during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.

PURPOSE: Surgical voice restoration (SVR) is associated with improved patient quality of life following laryngectomy. This study aims to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with SVR and analyse the complications in this cohort of patients. METHOD: A retrospective review of all patients with SVR at a single tertiary ear, nose, and throat (ENT) unit in the UK for 12 months during the COVID-19 pandemic, with comparison to the preceding 12 months. A survey was also administered to assess patients' experiences during the pandemic. RESULT: Thirty-six patients were included in this study. During the pandemic period, 19.5% (n = 7) patients had significant complications, with five patients needing surgery to restore speech. In the 12 months pre-pandemic, 13.5% (n = 5) had significant complications, although none required surgery to restore speech. Six patients (19.4%) felt these complications were avoidable in normal circumstances. Further, 30.5% (n = 11) of patients reported a delay in seeking medical attention due to concerns about their vulnerability to COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on many patients with SVR. This has resulted in a large proportion of patients experiencing delayed care, a loss of voice, a need for further surgical intervention, and negative impacts on their quality of life.

Voice Restoration and Quality of Life in Larynx Cancer.

Voice restoration following laryngectomy has a significant influence on quality of life (QOL). Three main techniques exist to provide voice: esophageal speech (ES), artificial larynx (electrolarynx [EL]), and tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP). Although the EL was historically the most used technique, TEP has quickly become the gold standard. ES remains the least frequently used technique in developed countries. Technique selection must be made on an individual basis, considering the patient's cancer history and comorbidities. Ultimately, the choice in voice-restoration technique requires joint decision making with the surgeon, speech pathologist, and patient.

[Historical and modern aspects of rehabilitation of voice function after laryngectomy]. / Istoricheskie i sovremennye aspekty reabilitatsii golosovoi funktsii posle laringektomii.

The literature review presents historical and modern aspects of the rehabilitation of vocal function after laryngectomy, in particular, external devices, tracheopharyngeal bypass surgery, esophageal speech, tracheoesophageal bypass surgery without the use of a prosthetic device, voice prostheses are described. The advantages and disadvantages of each voice restoration technique, functional results, complications, prosthesis designs, their service life, bypass techniques, methods of prevention and treatment of damage to the valve apparatus of the prosthesis by colonies of microorganisms, fungal flora are analyzed.

A novel procedure of secondary voice prosthesis insertion from the inside out: The modified Fukuhara method.

OBJECTIVE: To present a new procedure for inserting a secondary voice prosthesis from the inside to the outside, which improves on the method previously reported by Fukuhara et al. METHODS: A flexible nasopharyngoscope was used to puncture pharynx (or transplanted jejunum) from the inside to the outside. In this method, it was possible to use the PROVOX® VegaTM Puncture Set as it is used for the placement of the voice prosthesis. RESULTS: We were able to place the PROVOX® VegaTM in all cases we experienced. Most of the cases had a history of radiation therapy. The time required for surgery ranged from 11-59 minutes (mean: 29 minutes) and there was no measurable amount of bleeding. CONCLUSION: This new method using the PROVOX® VegaTM Puncture Set, which is designed for the original purpose of voice prosthesis implantation, was therefore found to be safe and effective.

Speech restoration with tracheoesophageal prosthesis after total laryngectomy: An observational study of vocal results, complications and quality of life.

OBJECTIVES: To study voice prosthesis survival, complications, efficacy and impact on quality of life. METHODS: A single-center observational study was performed in patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx or hypopharynx by total (pharyngo)-laryngectomy between 2010 and 2015. Study data comprised: maximum phonation time (sec), number of and reasons for prosthesis exchanges (leakage through or around the prosthesis, expulsion or inclusion of the prosthesis), plus 2 quality of life questionnaires (QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35) and the Voice Handicap Inventory (VHI 30). RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were included. The most common causes of prosthesis exchange were leakage through (73.2%) or around the prosthesis (18.5%). The median time between exchanges was 4 months. Global quality of life status on the QLQ-C30 was 63.5. Mean maximum phonation time was 7.4sec. Mean VHI was 46/120; 10 patients had a mild voice handicap, 12 moderate and 10 severe. No relation emerged between the number of prosthesis exchanges per year and quality of life. Voice handicap significantly decreased quality of life, with QLQ-C30 72.3 for the 22 patients with mild to moderate voice handicap and 44.2 for the 10 patients with severe voice handicap (P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Voice restoration by tracheoesophageal prosthesis after total (pharyngo)-laryngectomy is a reliable technique that decreases voice handicap and, despite potentially serious complications, has little negative impact on quality of life.

Investigating blunt force trauma to the larynx: The role of inferior-superior vocal fold displacement on phonation.

Blunt force trauma to the larynx, which may result from motor vehicle collisions, sports activities, etc., can cause significant damage, often leading to displaced fractures of the laryngeal cartilages, thereby disrupting vocal function. Current surgical interventions primarily focus on airway restoration to stabilize the patient, with restoration of vocal function usually being a secondary consideration. Due to laryngeal fracture, asymmetric vertical misalignment of the left or right vocal fold (VF) in the inferior-superior direction often occurs. This affects VF closure and can lead to a weak, breathy voice requiring increased vocal effort. It is unclear, however, how much vertical VF misalignment can be tolerated before voice quality degrades significantly. To address this need, the influence of inferior-superior VF displacement on phonation is investigated in 1.0mm increments using synthetic, self-oscillating VF models in a physiologically-representative facility. Acoustic (SPL, frequency, H1-H2, jitter, and shimmer), kinematic (amplitude and phase differences), and aerodynamic parameters (flow rate and subglottal pressure) are investigated as a function of inferior-superior vertical displacement. Significant findings include that once the inferior-superior medial length of the VF is surpassed, sustained phonation degrades precipitously, becoming severely pathological. If laryngeal reconstruction approaches can ensure VF contact is maintained during phonation (i.e., vertical displacement doesn't surpass VF medial length), improved vocal outcomes are expected.

Assessment of Factors Impacting Long-Term Utilization of Tracheoesophageal Speech Among Laryngectomees.

OBJECTIVE(S): To evaluate complication rate and abandonment rate after tracheoesophageal puncture and to assess factors associated with these outcome measures. METHODS: Retrospective review of laryngectomy patients seen at a single academic institution between 1/1/2003 and 12/1/2018. Charts reviewed for demographics, medical comorbidities, tumor characteristics, surgical data, adjuvant treatment history, and complications related to laryngectomy or tracheoesophageal puncture. Complications were divided into minor and major. RESULTS: A total of 293 laryngectomees met inclusion criteria. Of these, 69 patients (23.5%) underwent tracheoesophageal puncture. Average follow up was 64.6 months (SD 58.3). Overall laryngectomy complication rate was 43.3%. Overall tracheoesophageal puncture complication rate was 73.9%, with 39.1% of patients having major complications and 34.8% having minor complications only. Total abandonment rate for tracheoesophageal puncture was 34.8%. No associations were seen between tracheoesophageal puncture complication or abandonment rates based on age, gender, race, or insurance status. An increased rate of laryngectomy complications was seen after primary tracheoesophageal puncture (76.5% vs 41.3%, P = .005). CONCLUSION: Tracheoesophageal puncture outcomes were similar in patients with varied demographic, medical, and treatment backgrounds. When considering timing, our findings suggest that patients should be counseled on the possibility of increased complication risk after primary tracheoesophageal puncture. In those in whom the surgeon already has concerns about wound healing, it may be prudent to avoid primary tracheoesophageal puncture. The relatively high abandonment rate emphasizes the value of this measure of tracheoesophageal puncture outcome and highlights the need for appropriate patient counseling and prospective studies assessing the decision to abandon.

[The progress of voice restoration after total laryngectomy].

Total laryngectomy or laryngopharyngectomy is the main treatment strategy of choice for advanced laryngeal/hypopharyngeal carcinoma.However,the operation is associated with important consequences over and above the loss of normal voice.Therefore,it is necessary toachieve voice in the absence of a functional larynx.The objective of this article is to provide an over view of current methods and a summary of the present progress about voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy.

Perceptual Assessment of Tracheoesophageal Voice Quality With the SToPS: The Development of a Reliable and Valid Tool.

Perceptual assessment of tracheoesophageal voice quality following total laryngectomy with surgical voice restoration is essential to investigate functional outcomes in relation to surgical procedure and rehabilitation regimes. There is no current tool with established reliability and validity to fulfill this purpose. This study describes the development of a set of new perceptual scales, in relation to core validity and reliability issues. These were investigated using voice stimuli from 55 voice prosthesis speakers and evaluated by 22 judges-12 speech and language therapists (SLTs), 10 Ear, Nose, and Throat surgeons-classified into experienced or not at assessing voice. SLT judges rated more parameters reliably than Ear, Nose, and Throat raters, and SLTs with specialist experience in laryngectomy and laryngeal voice attained the most parameters at an acceptable level of agreement. These scales are ready for clinical use, with the most optimal assessors being expert SLTs. Future studies are needed to ascertain precisely how reliability may relate to training, experience, voice stimuli type, and scale format.

National trends in primary tracheoesophageal puncture after total laryngectomy.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) can be performed at the time of laryngectomy (primary) or postoperatively (secondary). Prior studies demonstrate safe and earlier voice acquisition and rehabilitation with primary TEP. The objectives of this study were to assess national trends in primary TEP and identify factors associated with its use. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2010 to 2014 was performed. The NIS was queried for patients who underwent total laryngectomy (TL) (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] 30.3-30.4) and primary TEP (ICD-9-CM 31.95). Patient demographics, comorbidities, and factors known to influence the decision to perform TEP were characterized. Factors associated with primary TEP were identified by multivariable regression. RESULTS: A total of 15,410 patients underwent TL during the study period. Of this cohort, 1,124 patients (7.3%) underwent primary TEP. Among patients who underwent primary TEP, 80.9% had laryngeal cancer, 16.4% had pedicled or free-flap reconstruction at the time of TL, 4.2% underwent partial pharyngectomy, and 48.0% underwent cricopharyngeal myotomy (CPM). The majority of primary TEPs were performed at urban teaching hospitals (90.6%). In multivariable regression, patients who underwent CPM were at significantly increased odds of primary TEP (odds ratio: 3.79, P < .0001). Flap reconstruction, partial pharyngectomy, age, gender, history of laryngeal cancer, hospital region, and teaching status were not associated. CONCLUSIONS: Primary TEP is associated with earlier voice restoration after TL but is infrequently performed. The majority of primary TEPs are performed in teaching hospitals, and primary TEP is associated with concurrent cricopharyngeal myotomy. Future studies should investigate practice patterns associated with primary TEP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:2320-2325, 2018.

Long-term results of Amatsu tracheoesophageal shunt: Follow-up of more than 5 years.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The Amatsu tracheoesophageal shunt (ATES) represents a nonprosthesis surgical option for voice restoration in laryngectomized patients. However, data regarding the long-term efficacy of ATES are lacking. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, single-institution study. METHODS: Between 2001 and 2010, 16 patients with laryngeal cancer underwent total laryngectomy with ATES at the Hyogo Cancer Center (Akashi, Hyogo, Japan). Of these, 11 achieved long-term tracheoesophageal speech that was maintained for a follow-up exceeding 5 years (range 75-161 months; median 95 months). All patients were male and ranged from 46 to 74 years of age at the time of ATES surgery. RESULTS: Of 11 eligible patients, eight were able to speak intelligibly with ATES at last follow-up. Regarding aspiration, three patients experienced no leakage, and six experienced mild leakage of saliva without medical intervention at last follow-up. Almost all patients maintained an unchanged degree of voice quality (9 of 11) and leakage (8 of 11). CONCLUSION: The favorable voice restoration and low aspiration rates achieved in this study appear to support the long-term efficacy of ATES. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:1395-1397, 2018.

The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy.

The ability to speak and communicate with one's voice is a unique human characteristic and is fundamental to many activities of daily living, such as talking on the phone and speaking to loved ones. When the larynx is removed during a total laryngectomy (TL), loss of voice can lead to a devastating decrease in a patient's quality of life, and precipitate significant frustration over their inability to communicate with others effectively. Over the past 50 years there have been many advances in techniques of voice restoration after TL. Currently, there are three main methods of voice restoration: the electrolarynx, esophageal speech, and tracheoesophageal speech through a tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) with voice prosthesis. Although TEP voice is the current gold standard for vocal rehabilitation, a significant minority of patients cannot use or obtain TEP speech for various reasons. As such, the electrolarynx is a viable and useful alternative for these patients. This article will focus on voice restoration using an electrolarynx with the following objectives: 1) To provide an understanding of the importance of voice restoration after total laryngectomy. 2) To discuss how the electrolarynx may be used to restore voice following total laryngectomy. 3) To outline some of the current electrolarynx devices available, including their mechanism of action and limitations. 4) To compare pros and cons of electrolaryngeal speech to TEP and esophageal speech.

Post-laryngectomy voice rehabilitation with a voice prosthesis in a young girl with advanced thyroid cancer.

The aim of this report is to evaluate the effects of voice rehabilitation with a voice prosthesis in a young patient with thyroid cancer. A 17-year-old girl underwent voice restoration with a voice prosthesis after laryngectomy to treat thyroid cancer. She completed voice-related questionnaires (the Voice Handicap Index-10 and Voice-Related Quality Of Life Survey) at ages 17 and 21 and underwent phonetic functional evaluation. The sound spectrograms of her phonation using the voice prosthesis showed low frequency sounds without an obvious basic frequency. She was ashamed of her hoarse voice and did not use her voice prosthesis during high school. However, after beginning to work at age 20, she used her voice to communicate in the workplace. At age 21, her questionnaire scores, especially those related to the physical and functional domains, improved compared with those at age 17. Voice restoration with a voice prosthesis is recommended for young patients who undergo laryngectomy for advanced thyroid cancer. The advantages of voice restoration with a voice prosthesis may increase when the patient reaches working age, and it may improve post-laryngectomy quality of life considerably.

The Effect of Initial Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis Size on Postoperative Complications and Voice Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal initial size of tracheoesophageal voice prosthesis (TEVP) for tracheoesophageal voice restoration (TEVR) remains unclear. As purported advantages exist favoring the placement of both 16F and 20F prostheses, this study compares complications and voicing outcomes after placement of 16 and 20 French (F) prostheses. METHODS: All cases of TEVR at an academic medical center were retrospectively reviewed (2007-2013). Complications including dislodgement, leakage, infection, and granulation tissue were compared. Outcomes including frequency of prosthesis change, acquisition of speech, and time to fluent speech were compared. RESULTS: Of 47 patients, 25 received 20F prostheses, and 22 received 16F. Postoperative complications were similar between groups, including leakage around the prosthesis (P = .373) and aspiration pneumonia (P = .670). There were no significant differences in timing of voicing or ability to achieve fluency. Although the 20F group appeared to undergo fewer prostheses changes per year (3.0 vs 5.3) and had a longer duration of use before first prosthesis change (76 vs 43 days), neither difference was found to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Voice restoration was successfully achieved using either 16F or 20F prostheses. Prosthesis diameter did not significantly affect complications or voicing. Both prostheses may be placed with safety and efficacy, allowing the practitioner to choose based on the potential individual benefits of either device.

Voice Restoration After Total Laryngectomy.

The ability to speak and communicate vocally is a unique human characteristic that is often taken for granted but is fundamental to many activities of daily living. Loss of voice after total laryngectomy can lead to a serious decrease in quality of life and can precipitate significant frustration over the inability to communicate effectively. There are 3 main methods of voice restoration: esophageal speech, usage of the electrolarynx, and tracheal-esophageal puncture for tracheal-esophageal speech, which can be performed primarily or secondarily. Although all 3 methods have potential benefits, the gold standard is tracheal-esophageal speech.

Voice rehabilitation with tragal cartilage and perichondrium after vertical partial laryngectomy for glottic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The goal of the study is to test medialization of the neocord after oncological surgery for glottic cancer, using autologous tragal cartilage and perichondrium by the direct approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients underwent comprehensive assessment including auditory perceptual assessment, videostrobolaryngoscopy, and acoustic voice analysis. The cartilage graft was inserted into a pocket created in the tyroarytenoid - lateral cricoarytenoid muscle complex or the excavated musculomembranous part of the neocord, and fixed by placing the perichondrium by the direct approach. The patients were evaluated preoperatively, and at 14 days, 60 days, and 6 months later. RESULTS: Improvement of voice and breathiness was correlated with the increase of closed quotient and harmonic-to-noise ratio; the acoustic voice parameters studied showed significant differences between preoperative and postoperative voices, and these objective measurements of voice changes provided accurate and documentary evidence of the results of surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: This method may be considered a safe and efficient phonosurgical procedure for voice restoration.

Primary tracheoesophageal puncture with supraclavicular artery island flap after total laryngectomy or laryngopharyngectomy.

The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is increasingly employed for laryngectomy reconstruction with excellent success. Although tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) with intraoperative prosthesis placement is also positively reported, this is not described in patients following SCAIF. We review our experience with primary TEP with prosthesis placement and voice outcomes in patients after SCAIF reconstruction. Seven patients underwent SCAIF with primary TEP after laryngectomy from 2011 to 2013. Five underwent total laryngectomy (TL) and 2 underwent TL with partial pharyngectomy. All patients had 16 French Indwelling Blom-Singer prostheses placed intraoperatively without complications. Six patients achieved tracheoesophageal voice (median time = 1.5 months). Two patients required cricopharyngeal segment Botox injections. One patient remained aphonic. One patient developed prosthesis leakage addressed with prosthesis replacement. Our preliminary data demonstrate that similar to free tissue transfer reconstruction, primary TEP with intraoperative placement of the voice prosthesis at the time of SCAIF reconstruction is safe and effective.