Effects of electron density force to 1.0 and fill to 1.0 on VMAT treatment plans for lung SBRT.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine the effect of forcing and filling the electron density (ED) to 1.0 of the planning target volume (PTV) overdose distribution in lung SBRT treatment leading to shortening patient treatment time and increasing patient comfort by reducing MU/fraction due to ED manipulation effect. METHODS: In this study, 36 lung SBRT plans of 12 suitable patients who prescribed a total dose of 50 Gy in five fractions were generated with Monaco v.5.10 TPS using the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique by PTV ED values forcing as well as filling to 1.0 and comparatively assessed. The first group of plans was created by using the patient's original ED, second and third groups of plans were reoptimized by forcing and filling the ED of PTV to 1.0, respectively, therefore acquiring a new dose distribution which lead to comparatively assessment the effects of changes in ED on PTV and OAR doses. RESULTS: Assessment of treatment plans revealed that mean MU/fx numbers were decreased by 76% and 75.25% between Groups 1 and 2, Groups 1 and 3, respectively. The number of segments was also reduced in Group 1 by up to 15% compared with Groups 2 and 3. Maximum HI and CI differences for PTV between Groups 1 and 2 were less than 1% and Groups 1 and 3 were 1.5% which indicates all 3 group plans were comparable in terms of dose distribution within PTV. CONCLUSIONS: Forcing and filling the ED of PTV to 1.0 strategy has provided reduced a number of segments and MU/fx without a significant change in PTV mean and maximum doses, thereby decreasing treatment time and patient discomfort during treatment. This process should be considered in line of a potential number of patients as well as prescribed dose and MU/fx numbers.

Setup errors analysis in iterative kV CBCT: A clinical study of cervical cancer treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze setup errors in pelvic Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for patients with non-surgical primary cervical cancer, utilizing the onboard iterative kV cone beam CT (iCBCT) imaging system on the Varian Halcyon 2.0 ring gantry structure accelerator to enhance radiotherapy precision. METHOD: We selected 132 cervical cancer patients who underwent VMAT with daily iCBCT imaging guidance. Before each treatment session, a registration method based on the bony structure was employed to acquire iCBCT images with the corresponding planning CT images. Following verification and adjustment of image registration results along the three axes (but not rotational), setup errors in the lateral (X-axis), longitudinal (Y-axis), and vertical (Z-axis) directions were recorded for each patient. Subsequently, we analyzed 3642 iCBCT image setup errors. RESULTS: The mean setup errors for the X, Y, and Z axes were 4.50 ± 3.79 mm, 6.08 ± 6.30 mm, and 1.48 ± 2.23 mm, respectively. Before correction with iCBCT, setup margins based on the Van Herk formula for the X, Y, and Z axes were 6.28, 12.52, and 3.26 mm, respectively. In individuals aged 60 years and older, setup errors in the X and Y axes were significantly larger than those in the younger group (p < 0.05). Additionally, there is no significant linear correlation between setup errors and treatment fraction numbers. CONCLUSION: Data analysis underscores the importance of precise Y-axis setup for cervical cancer patients undergoing VMAT. Radiotherapy centers without daily iCBCT should appropriately extend the planning target volume (PTV) along the Y-axis for cervical cancer patients receiving pelvic VMAT. Elderly patients exhibit significantly larger setup errors compared to younger counterparts. In conclusion, iCBCT-guided radiotherapy is recommended for cervical cancer patients undergoing VMAT to improve setup precision.

Generating 3D images of VMAT plans for predictive models and activation maps associated with plan deliverability.

BACKGROUND: Intensity modulation with dynamic multi-leaf collimator (MLC) and monitor unit (MU) changes across control points (CPs) characterizes volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The increased uncertainty in plan deliverability required patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA), which remained inefficient upon Quality Assurance (QA) failure. To prevent waste before QA, plan complexity metrics (PCMs) and machine learning models with the metrics were generated, which were lack of providing CP-specific information upon QA failures. PURPOSE: By generating 3D images from digital imaging and comminications in medicine in radiation therapy (DICOM RT) plan, we proposed a predictive model that can estimate the deliverability of VMAT plans and visualize CP-specific regions associated with plan deliverability. METHODS: The patient cohort consisted of 259 and 190 cases for left- and right-breast VMAT treatments, which were split into 235 and 166 cases for training and 24 cases from each treatment for testing the networks. Three-channel 3D images generated from DICOM RT plans were fed into a DenseNet-based deep learning network. To reflect VMAT plan complexity as an image, the first two channels described MLC and MU variations between two consecutive CPs, while the last channel assigned the beam field size. The network output was defined as binary classified PSQA results, indicating deliverability. The predictive performance was assessed by accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC). The gradient-weighted class activation map (Grad-CAM) highlighted the regions of CPs in VMAT plans associated with deliverability, compared against PCMs by Spearman correlation. RESULTS: The DenseNet-based predictive model yielded AUCs of 92.2% and 93.8%, F1-scores of 97.0% and 93.8% and accuracies of 95.8% and 91.7% for the left- and right-breast VMAT cases. Additionally, the specificity of 87.5% for both cases indicated that the predictive model accurately detected QA failing cases. The activation maps significantly differentiated QA failing-labeled from passing-labeled classes for the non-deliverable cases. The PCM with the highest correlation to the Grad-CAM varied from patient cases, implying that plan deliverability would be considered patient-specific. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrated that the deep learning-based network based on visualization of dynamic VMAT plan information successfully predicted plan deliverability, which also provided control-point specific planning parameter information associated with plan deliverability in a patient-specific manner.

Development and validation of an automated Tomotherapy planning method for cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop an automated Tomotherapy (TOMO) planning method for cervical cancer treatment, and to validate its feasibility and effectiveness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study enrolled 30 cervical cancer patients treated with TOMO at our center. Utilizing scripting and Python environment within the RayStation (RaySearch Labs, Sweden) treatment planning system (TPS), we developed automated planning methods for TOMO and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques. The clinical manual TOMO (M-TOMO) plans for the 30 patients were re-optimized using automated planning scripts for both TOMO and VMAT, creating automated TOMO (A-TOMO) and automated VMAT (A-VMAT) plans. We compared A-TOMO with M-TOMO and A-VMAT plans. The primary evaluated relevant dosimetric parameters and treatment plan efficiency were assessed using the two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test for statistical analysis, with a P-value < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. RESULTS: A-TOMO plans maintained similar target dose uniformity compared to M-TOMO plans, with improvements in target conformity and faster dose drop-off outside the target, and demonstrated significant statistical differences (P+ < 0.01). A-TOMO plans also significantly outperformed M-TOMO plans in reducing V50Gy, V40Gy and Dmean for the bladder and rectum, as well as Dmean for the bowel bag, femoral heads, and kidneys (all P+ < 0.05). Additionally, A-TOMO plans demonstrated better consistency in plan quality. Furthermore, the quality of A-TOMO plans was comparable to or superior than A-VMAT plans. In terms of efficiency, A-TOMO significantly reduced the time required for treatment planning to approximately 20 min. CONCLUSION: We have successfully developed an A-TOMO planning method for cervical cancer. Compared to M-TOMO plans, A-TOMO plans improved target conformity and reduced radiation dose to OARs. Additionally, the quality of A-TOMO plans was on par with or surpasses that of A-VMAT plans. The A-TOMO planning method significantly improved the efficiency of treatment planning.

Dosimetric comparison of IMPT vs VMAT for multiple lung lesions: an NTCP model-based decision-making strategy.

To compare the dosimetric differences in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of multiple lung lesions and determine a normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model-based decision strategy that determines which treatment modality the patient will use. A total of 41 patients were retrospectively selected for this study. The number of patients with 1-6 lesions was 5, 16, 7, 6, 3, and 4, respectively. A prescription dose of 70 GyRBE in 10 fractions was given to each lesion. SBRT plans were generated using VMAT and IMPT. All the IMPT plans used robustness optimization with ± 3.5% range uncertainties and 5 mm setup uncertainties. Dosimetric metrics and the predicted NTCP value of radiation pneumonitis (RP), esophagitis, and pericarditis were analyzed to evaluate the potential clinical benefits between different planning groups. In addition, a threshold for the ratio of PTV to lungs (%) to determine whether a patient would benefit highly from IMPT was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. All plans reached target coverage (V70GyRBE ≥ 95%). Compared with VMAT, IMPT resulted in a significantly lower dose of most thoracic normal tissues. For the 1-2, 3-4 and 5-6 lesion groups, the lung V5 was 29.90 ± 9.44%, 58.33 ± 13.35%, and 81.02 ± 5.91% for VMAT and 11.34 ± 3.11% (p < 0.001), 21.45 ± 3.80% (p < 0.001), and 32.48 ± 4.90% (p < 0.001) for IMPT, respectively. The lung V20 was 12.07 ± 4.94%, 25.57 ± 6.54%, and 43.99 ± 11.83% for VMAT and 6.76 ± 1.80% (p < 0.001), 13.14 ± 2.27% (p < 0.01), and 19.62 ± 3.48% (p < 0.01) for IMPT. The Dmean of the total lung was 7.65 ± 2.47 GyRBE, 14.78 ± 2.75 GyRBE, and 21.64 ± 4.07 GyRBE for VMAT and 3.69 ± 1.04 GyRBE (p < 0.001), 7.13 ± 1.41 GyRBE (p < 0.001), and 10.69 ± 1.81 GyRBE (p < 0.001) for IMPT. Additionally, in the VMAT group, the maximum NTCP value of radiation pneumonitis was 73.91%, whereas it was significantly lower in the IMPT group at 10.73%. The accuracy of our NTCP model-based decision model, which combines the number of lesions and PTV/Lungs (%), was 97.6%. The study demonstrated that the IMPT SBRT for multiple lung lesions had satisfactory dosimetry results, even when the number of lesions reached 6. The NTCP model-based decision strategy presented in our study could serve as an effective tool in clinical practice, aiding in the selection of the optimal treatment modality between VMAT and IMPT.

Sparing the Hippocampus in Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Using Three Different Linear Accelerators: A Comparative Study.

Hippocampus protection, as an organ at risk in brain radiotherapy, might protect patients' quality of life. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been used traditionally in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients as it increases survival. This study aimed to discover the contributing parameters for a successful PCI with simultaneous protection of the hippocampus by using three different treatment machines. For this purpose, treatment plans were generated for 45 SCLC patients using three half-arcs in three linear accelerators (LINACs; Elekta Infinity, Synergy, and Axesse; Elekta Ltd, Stockholm, Sweden) with different radiation field sizes and multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf thickness characteristics. The prescribed dose was 25 Gy in 10 fractions. Thresholds for the hippocampus were calculated based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0933 dose constraints. The planning and treatment system templates were common to all three LINACs. Plan evaluation was based on the dosimetric target coverage by the 95% isodose, the maximum dose of the plan, the conformity index (CI), the degree of plan modulation (MOD), and the patient-specific quality assurance (QA) pass rate. The mean target coverage was highest for Infinity (97.3%), followed by Axesse (96.6%) and Synergy (95.5%). The mean maximum dose was higher for Synergy (27.5 Gy), followed by Infinity (27.0 Gy) and Axesse (26.9 Gy). Axesse plans had the highest CI (0.93), followed by Infinity (0.91) and Synergy (0.88). Plan MOD was lower for Synergy (2.88) compared with Infinity (3.07) and Axesse (3.69). Finally, patient-specific QA was successful in all Infinity plans, in all but one Synergy plan, and in 17/45 Axesse plans, as was expected from the field size in that treatment unit. Based on overall performance, the most favorable combination of target coverage, hippocampus sparing, and plan deliverability was obtained with the LINAC, which has the largest field opening and thinnest MLC leaves.

Minimizing normal tissue low dose bath for left breast Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) using jaw offset.

PURPOSE: With proper beam setup and optimization constraints in the treatment planning system, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can improve target dose coverage and conformity while reducing doses to adjacent structures for whole breast radiation therapy. However, the low-dose bath effect on critical structures, especially the heart and the ipsilateral lung, remains a concern. In this study, we present a VMAT technique with the jaw offset VMAT (JO-VMAT) to reduce the leakage and scatter doses to critical structures for whole breast radiation therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 10 left breast cancer patients were retrospectively used for this study. CT images were acquired on a CT scanner (GE, Discovery) with the deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique. The planning target volumes (PTVs) and the normal structures (the lungs, the heart, and the contralateral breast) were contoured on the DIBH scan. A 3D field-in-field plan (3D-FiF), a tangential VMAT (tVMAT) plan, and a JO-VMAT plan were created with the Eclipse treatment planning system. An arc treatment field with the x-jaw closed across the central axis creates a donut-shaped high-dose distribution and a cylinder-shaped low-dose volume along the central axis of gantry rotation. Applying this setup with proper multi-leaf collimator (MLC) modulation, the optimized plan potentially can provide sufficient target coverage and reduce unnecessary irradiation to critical structures. The JO-VMAT plans involve 5-6 tangential arcs (3 clockwise arcs and 2-3 counterclockwise arcs) with jaw offsets. The plans were optimized with objective functions specified to achieve PTV dose coverage and homogeneity; For organs at risk (OARs), objective functions were specified individually for each patient to accomplish the best achievable treatment plan. For tVMAT plans, optimization constraints were kept the same except that the jaw offset was removed from the initial beam setup. The dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters were generated for dosimetric evaluation of PTV and OARs. RESULTS: The D95% to the PTV was greater than the prescription dose of 42.56 Gy for all the plans. With both VMAT techniques, the PTV conformity index (CI) was statistically improved from 0.62 (3D-FiF) to 0.83 for tVMAT and 0.84 for JO-VMAT plans. The difference in the homogeneity index (HI) was not significant. The Dmax to the heart was reduced from 12.15 Gy for 3D-FiF to 8.26 Gy for tVMAT and 7.20 Gy for JO-VMAT plans. However, a low-dose bath effect was observed with tVMAT plans to all the critical structures including the lungs, the heart, and the contralateral breast. With JO-VMAT, the V5Gy and V2Gy of the heart were reduced by 32.7% and 15.4% compared to 3D-FiF plans. Significantly, the ipsilateral lung showed a reduction in mean dose (4.65-3.44 Gy) and low dose parameters (23.4% reduction for V5Gy and 10.7% reduction for V2Gy) for JO-VMAT plans compared to the 3D-FiF plans. The V2Gy dose to the contralateral lung and breast was minimal with JO-VMAT techniques. CONCLUSION: A JO-VMAT technique was evaluated in this study and compared with 3D-FiF and tVMAT techniques. Our results showed that the JO-VMAT technique can achieve clinically comparable coverage and homogeneity and significantly improve dose conformity within PTV. Additionally, JO-VMAT eliminated the low-dose bath effect at all OARs evaluation metrics including the ipsilateral/contralateral lung, the heart, and the contralateral breast compared to 3D-FiF and tVMAT. This technique is feasible for the whole breast radiation therapy of left breast cancers.

Optimising craniospinal irradiation for medulloblastoma: a dosimetric comparison of two VMAT planning methods.

Background: Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) poses a challenging planning process because of the complex target volume. Traditional 3D conformal CSI does not spare any critical organs, resulting in toxicity in patients. Here the dosimetric advantages of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using partial arc and avoidance sectors are compared with each other in planning in adult patients undergoing CSI to develop a clinically feasible technique that is both effective and efficient. Patient and methods: Eight adult patients treated with CSI were retrospectively identified. In total 16 plans were made. We generated two plans for each patient: 1. VMAT plan using partial arc, namely VMAT_pa. 2. VMAT plan using avoidance sectors, namely VMAT_as. The dose prescribed was 36 Gy in 20 fractions. The dose-volume histogram for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) (lens, eye, heart, thyroid, lungs, liver, gonads and kidneys) were analysed and compared. Dose parameters of mean dose, V95%, and V107% for the PTV were evaluated. Results: The median length of PTV is 65.58 cm (45.8-79.5). The volume of PTV receiving 95% of the dose (V95%) in both the plans are 97.51% (VMAT_as) and 97.99% (VMAT_pa) (p = 0.121) while V107% are 0.733 and 0.742 for VMAT_as and VMAT_pa, respectively (p = 0.969). The doses of OARs such as lens, eye, liver and gonads were comparable. The mean heart dose was 10.4 and 9.0 Gy in VMAT_as and VMAT_pa plans, respectively (p = 0.005). Significant lower doses to the thyroid, kidneys and lungs were seen in VMAT plans using avoidance sectors. Conclusion: This study provides a practically useful VMAT planning method for the treatment of CSI and illustrates the ability of VMAT using avoidance sectors to generate highly conformal and homogeneous treatment plans for CSI, while limiting the dose to the relevant OARs.

Impact of flattening filter-free beams on remaining volume at risk in lung cancer treatment.

Modern radiotherapy machines offer a new modality, like flattening filter-free beam (FFF), which is used especially in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to reduce treatment time. The remaining volume at risk (RVR) is known as undefined normal tissue, and assists in evaluating late effects such as carcinogenesis. This study aimed to compare the effects of flattening and un-flattened beams on RVR in lung cancer treated by conventional doses using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Twenty-three lung cancer patients with a prescribed dose of 60 Gy delivered in 30 fractions were selected retrospectively. Four treatment plans were generated for each case (VMAT FF, VMAT FFF, IMRT FF and IMRT FFF). Mean doses to RVR and volumes that received low doses (V15Gy, V10Gy and V5Gy) were introduced as RVR evaluation parameters. Variance percentage comparison between flattening filter (FF) and FFF for the RVR evaluation parameters gave 2.38, 1.10, 1.80 and 2.22 for VMAT, and 1.73, 1.18, 1.62 and 1.81 for IMRT. In contrast, VMAT and IMRT RVR evaluation parameters resulted in variance percentage differences of 10.29, 5.02, - 8.84 and - 4.82 for FF, and 11.18, 4.96, - 8.59 and - 4.48for FFF. It is concluded that in terms of RVR evaluation parameters, FFF is clinically beneficial compared to FF for RVR, due to the decrease in mean RVR dose and low-dose irradiated RVR volume. Furthermore, VMAT is preferred in the mean RVR dose and V15Gy, while IMRT is better in V10Gy and V5Gy for RVR.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer: Improving treatment delivery efficiency and accuracy.

Purpose: In stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer, intrafraction motion is an important source of treatment uncertainty as it could not be completely smoothed through fractionation. Herein, we compared different arrangements and beam qualities for extreme hypofractionated treatments to minimize beam delivery time and so intrafractional errors. Methods: A retrospective dataset of 11 patients was used. Three volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) beam arrangements were compared for a prescription dose of 40 Gy/5 fractions: two full arcs, 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF); one full arc, 6 MV FFF; one full arc, 10 MV FFF. A plan quality index was defined to compare achievement of the planning goals. Plan complexity was evaluated with the modulation factor. Dose delivery accuracy and efficiency were measured with patient-specific quality assurance plans. Results: All treatment plans fulfilled all dose objectives. No statistical differences were found both in plan quality and complexity. Very accurate dose delivery was achieved with the three arrangements, with mean γ passing rates >96.5 % (2 %/2 mm criteria). Slightly but significantly higher γ passing rates were observed with single-arc 6 MV FFF. Contrariwise, statistically significant reductions of the delivery time were obtained with single-arc geometries: the average delivery times were 1.6 min (-46.1 %) and 1.3 min (-56.2 %) for 6 and 10 MV FFF respectively. Conclusions: The high-quality, very fast and accurate dose delivery of single-arc plans confirmed the suitability of this arrangement for prostate SBRT. In particular, the significant reduction of delivery time would improve treatment robustness against intrafraction prostate motion.

A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Dose Prediction Models for Cervical Cancer Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

Purpose: Deep learning (DL) is widely used in dose prediction for radiation oncology, multiple DL techniques comparison is often lacking in the literature. To compare the performance of 4 state-of-the-art DL models in predicting the voxel-level dose distribution for cervical cancer volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods and Materials: A total of 261 patients' plans for cervical cancer were retrieved in this retrospective study. A three-channel feature map, consisting of a planning target volume (PTV) mask, organs at risk (OARs) mask, and CT image was fed into the three-dimensional (3D) U-Net and its 3 variants models. The data set was randomly divided into 80% as training-validation and 20% as testing set, respectively. The model performance was evaluated on the 52 testing patients by comparing the generated dose distributions against the clinical approved ground truth (GT) using mean absolute error (MAE), dose map difference (GT-predicted), clinical dosimetric indices, and dice similarity coefficients (DSC). Results: The 3D U-Net and its 3 variants DL models exhibited promising performance with a maximum MAE within the PTV 0.83% ± 0.67% in the UNETR model. The maximum MAE among the OARs is the left femoral head, which reached 6.95% ± 6.55%. For the body, the maximum MAE was observed in UNETR, which is 1.19 ± 0.86%, and the minimum MAE was 0.94 ± 0.85% for 3D U-Net. The average error of the Dmean difference for different OARs is within 2.5 Gy. The average error of V40 difference for the bladder and rectum is about 5%. The mean DSC under different isodose volumes was above 90%. Conclusions: DL models can predict the voxel-level dose distribution accurately for cervical cancer VMAT treatment plans. All models demonstrated almost analogous performance for voxel-wise dose prediction maps. Considering all voxels within the body, 3D U-Net showed the best performance. The state-of-the-art DL models are of great significance for further clinical applications of cervical cancer VMAT.

Longitudinal Assessment of Quality of Life in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients Treated with Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy at Different Time Points.

PURPOSE: This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the quality of life (QoL) in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) versus volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) at different time points. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal assessment of QoL on 287 newly diagnosed NPC patients (IMPT: 41 and VMAT: 246). We collected outcomes of global QoL, functional QoL, C30 symptoms, and HN35 symptoms from EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HN35 questionnaires at pre-radiotherapy, during radiotherapy (around 40 Gy), 3 months post radiotherapy, and 12-months post radiotherapy (RT). The generalized estimating equation was utilized to interpret the group effect, originating from inherent group differences; time effect, attributed to RT effects over time; and interaction of the group and time effect. RESULTS: IMPT demonstrated superior mean dose reductions in 12 of the 16 organs at risk compared to VMAT, including a significant (>50%) reduction in the oral cavity and larynx. Both groups exhibited improved scores of global QoL, functional QoL, and C30 symptoms at 12 months post RT compared to the pre-RT status. Regarding global QoL and C30 symptoms, there was no interaction effect of group over time. In contrast, significant interaction effects were observed on functional QoL (p = 0.040) and HN35 symptoms (p = 0.004) during RT, where IMPT created an average of 7.5 points higher functional QoL and 10.7 points lower HN35 symptoms than VMAT. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to VMAT, dose reduction attributed to IMPT could translate into better functional QoL and HN35 symptoms, but the effect is time dependent and exclusively observed during the RT phase.

Comparative Analysis of VMAT and IMRT Techniques: Evaluation of Dose Constraints and Bone Marrow Sparing in Cervical Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoma of the cervix is a globally significant cause of morbidity and mortality among women. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy, a standard approach for locally advanced cervical cancer, invariably involves pelvic irradiation. Although this strategy is effective, it inevitably affects the pelvic bone marrow, a crucial hematopoietic site, and leads to hematological toxicity The potential of IMRT to spare bone marrow in pelvic irradiation settings has been an area of significant interest, with the aim to mitigate the hematological toxicity associated with pelvic radiotherapy. Radiotherapy techniques have evolved in terms of conformity and normal tissue sparing. Our study intends to explore the use of BM sparing techniques among patients of carcinoma cervix. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients of carcinoma cervix FIGO Stage IIIB treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy were selected for this study. The external contour of bones was delineated on planning CT as a surrogate for BM. We generated three plans on a single patient:1. without BM as the dose constraint, namely N-IMRT plan; 2. with BM constraint, namely BMS-IMRT plan; 3. VMAT plan in which BM constraint was given. The dose volume histogram (DVH) for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR) were analyzed. BM parameters: V10, V20, V30, V40, mean, maximum and minimum dose were compared.  Results: PTV coverage was comparable in all techniques. VMAT plans resulted in superior BM sparing compared with N-IMRT plan (P-<0.001) and BMS-IMRT plan (P-<0.001, 0.021 and 0.001 respectively for V20, V30 and V40). VMAT plans had better CI compared with BMS-IMRT (P-0.002) and N-IMRT (P-0.001) plans. CONCLUSION: Our study adds to the growing evidence that VMAT might be the preferred technique for patients with carcinoma of the cervix undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy, as it provides comparable target coverage and better sparing of bone marrow compared to IMRT.

Comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy for prostate cancer using Pareto fronts.

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing different radiotherapy treatment techniques-such as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT)-typically compare one treatment plan per technique. Often, some dose metrics favor one plan and others favor the other, so the final plan decision involves subjective preferences. Pareto front comparisons provide a more objective framework for comparing different treatment techniques. A Pareto front is the set of all treatment plans where improvement in one criterion is possible only by worsening another criterion. However, different Pareto fronts can be obtained depending on the chosen machine settings. PURPOSE: To compare VMAT and HT using Pareto fronts and blind expert evaluation, to explain the observed differences, and to illustrate limitations of using Pareto fronts. METHODS: We generated Pareto fronts for twenty-four prostate cancer patients treated at our clinic for VMAT and HT techniques using an in-house script that controlled a commercial treatment planning system. We varied the PTV under-coverage (100% - V95%) and the rectum mean dose, and fixed the mean doses to the bladder and femoral heads. In order to ensure a fair comparison, those fixed mean doses were the same for the two treatment techniques and the sets of objective functions were chosen so that the conformity indexes of the two treatment techniques were also the same. We used the same machine settings as are used in our clinic. Then, we compared the VMAT and HT Pareto fronts using a specific metric (clinical distance measure) and validated the comparison using a blinded expert evaluation of treatment plans on these fronts for all patients in the cohort. Furthermore, we investigated the observed differences between VMAT and HT and pointed out limitations of using Pareto fronts. RESULTS: Both clinical distance and blind treatment plan comparison showed that VMAT Pareto fronts were better than HT fronts. VMAT fronts for 10 and 6 MV beam energy were almost identical. HT fronts improved with different machine settings, but were still inferior to VMAT fronts. CONCLUSIONS: That VMAT Pareto fronts are better than HT fronts may be explained by the fact that the linear accelerator can rapidly vary the dose rate. This is an advantage in simple geometries that might vanish in more complex geometries. Furthermore, one should be cautious when speaking about Pareto optimal plans as the best possible plans, as their calculation depends on many parameters.

Patient specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy of synchronous bilateral breast cancer.

Synchronous bilateral breast cancers (SBBC) present a considerable issue in external beam radiotherapy because of large fields size and large target volumes. Mono-isocentric volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) appears as an appropriate irradiation technique for these types of tumors. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the utility of a 3D DVH pretreatment quality assurance program in VMAT of SBBC cases. Twenty SBBC patients who underwent radiation therapy in our department were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Fifteen patients were treated exclusively to the mammary glands. Five patients benefited from a dose boost on the tumor bed (60Gy). Nine patients were irradiated on the supraclavicular nodes (50Gy). This dose was delivered in 25 fractions and integrated boost was used when appropriate. Depending on the complexity of the treatment plans; 2 or 4 arcs VMAT plans were used in a mono-isocentric technique. The patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) was evaluated using COMPASS measured data, COMPASS reconstructed (CR) and COMPASS computed (CC) dose compared to treatment planning system (TPS) dose. Clinical evaluation was based on DVH metrics for target volumes and organ at risks. The maximum average dose deviation between TPS, CC, and CR was below 3%. The paired t-test between TPS, CC, and CR shows a strong agreement (p < 0.001). The 3DVH dose distribution comparison between TPS and COMPASS were also performed with good gamma score for global analysis. COMPASS was successfully evaluated as a 3DVH pretreatment system for SBBC despite the large fields size and complex target volumes. It allows the verification of the plan in 3D patient anatomy and the evaluation of dose discrepancies.

Long-term outcomes of whole-pelvis radiation therapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy for high-risk prostate cancer†.

This study investigated the outcomes of whole-pelvis radiation therapy (WPRT) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for high-risk prostate cancer. We retrospectively analysed 112 patients with high-risk prostate cancer who started WPRT at our hospital between August 2011 and August 2015. The prescribed dose was 78 Gy in 39 fractions to the prostate and 46.8 Gy in 26 fractions to the pelvic lymph node (LN) area. All patients received long-term androgen deprivation therapy. We evaluated late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The median follow-up period for censored cases was 97 (interquartile range [IQR] = 85-108) months. The median age was 72 (IQR = 67-75) years. The high-risk and very-high-risk groups included 41 (36.6%) and 71 patients (63.4%), respectively. The median risk of LN invasion calculated by the Roach formula was 36.9 (IQR = 26.6-56.3) %. The 8-year overall survival, biochemical failure-free survival, disease-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 88.4, 91.9, 83.8 and 98.0%, respectively. Only one patient experienced common iliac LN recurrence, which was outside the pelvic irradiation area. All patients with recurrent disease were categorized into the very-high-risk group. The 8-year cumulative rates of ≥Grade 2 late GI and GU toxicities were 12.8 and 11.8%, respectively. No patients experienced Grade 4 or higher toxicities. WPRT using VMAT for high-risk prostate cancer was well tolerated and effective.

Dosimetric and clinical aspects of head and neck cancer reirradiation with intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques over the last decade.

PURPOSE: Tumor recurrence in head and neck cancer (HNC) is very common, given that locoregional disease relapse occurs in up to 50% of patients. The clinical approach towards cancer recurrence is either by surgery and/or chemo-radiotherapy. Irrespective of the treatment, the management of HNC recurrence is highly challenging and often administered with palliative intent only. The aim of this work was to analyze clinical and dosimetric aspects, such as dose prescription, organ at risk sparing, overall survival and locoregional control of HNC after reirradiation with intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques based on studies published over the last decade, due to the wide clinical implementation of the intensity modulated radiotherapy and particularly of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for this malignancy. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was conducted within Pub-med/Medline databases to find relevant studies. Of the 130 articles fulfilling the initial search criteria, 15 were selected for final analysis that encompassed all set requirements. RESULTS: Clinical studies revealed the multitude of factors influencing treatment outcome, including anatomical location, histological tumor type, patient-related factors (smoking / comorbidities), cumulative dose and fractionation schedule, reirradiated volume and time between the irradiation of primary and recurrent tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Since the literature reports no specific data related to the type of intensity modulation used in reirradiation or any correlation with treatment outcome, IMRT and VMAT might offer comparable result after HNC reirradiation. Patient selection is potentially the main factor leading to an efficient outcome.

Advancing Precision in Post-mastectomy Chest Wall Radiotherapy: A Comparative Dosimetric Analysis of Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Based on Institutional Experience.

BACKGROUND: Post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) is an important component in the management of breast cancer patients who have undergone mastectomy. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are two popular methods of delivering PMRT. With IMRT, high radiation doses are directed at the tumor, while exposure to healthy tissue is kept to a minimum. VMAT, on the other hand, is a more advanced version of IMRT that allows for faster radiation dose delivery while maintaining precision. The complexity of the VMAT treatment planning and delivery process, on the other hand, may increase the risk of technical errors, which can reduce treatment effectiveness.  Studies have compared VMAT and IMRT in PMRT for breast cancer patients, but most have found no significant differences in treatment outcomes between the two methods. Individual patient factors such as treatment goals, available resources, and other characteristics may influence the choice between the two techniques. PURPOSE:  This prospective observational study aimed to compare the dosimetry of two cutting-edge modern radiotherapy techniques for post-mastectomy breast cancer patients receiving hypofractionated doses. METHODS:  For 58 patients with breast cancer, 116 plans for radiotherapy treatment were generated by both VMAT and IMRT. To maintain the uniformity of contouring, every CT image was contoured by the same physician, and Radiotherapy Oncology Group (RTOG) contouring guidelines were strictly followed during contouring. RESULTS: Both techniques had comparable target volume coverage, but VMAT produced a significantly better conformity index than IMRT for both the left (0.71 vs. 0.65) and right (0.72 vs. 0.66) breasts (p-value < 0.05). VMAT plans had significantly higher low-dose spillage to the ipsilateral lung (V5Gy and V10Gy) but significantly lower high-dose spillage (V20Gy, V30Gy, and V40Gy) than IMRT plans (p-value < 0.05). Dmax and Dmean for the ipsilateral lung were comparable for both techniques. When compared to alternative treatment approaches, IMRT treatment plans were found to be more effective in minimizing radiation exposure to the heart for all patients with right-sided breast cancer, resulting in considerably lower levels of Dmean, V5Gy, V10Gy, V20Gy, and V35Gy. Plans for VMAT treatment were found to be significantly superior to left-side chest wall radiotherapy in terms of lower exposure to the heart for higher doses. IMRT plans, on the other hand, were successful in dramatically lowering the levels of Dmax that reached the spinal cord for both right- and left-sided breast cancers. CONCLUSION: Apart from similar planning target volume (PTV) coverage to IMRT plans, VMAT produced significantly better conformity. VMAT plans have more low-dose spillage to normal tissues, while IMRT plans spare various organs at risk significantly better at lower doses in both right and left-sided breast cancer. VMAT was found to be better at sparing the heart (in left-sided breast cancer only) and ipsilateral lung at a high dose range. The best radiotherapy approach for breast cancer should be established on an individual basis, taking into account tumor laterality and the risk-benefit ratio.

Location of Recurrences after Trimodality Treatment for Glioblastoma with Respect to the Delivered Radiation Dose Distribution and Its Influence on Prognosis.

BACKGROUND: While prognosis of glioblastoma after trimodality treatment is well examined, recurrence pattern with respect to the delivered dose distribution is less well described. Therefore, here we examine the gain of additional margins around the resection cavity and gross-residual-tumor. METHODS: All recurrent glioblastomas initially treated with radiochemotherapy after neurosurgery were included. The percentage overlap of the recurrence with the gross tumor volume (GTV) expanded by varying margins (10 mm to 20 mm) and with the 95% and 90% isodose was measured. Competing-risks analysis was performed in dependence on recurrence pattern. RESULTS: Expanding the margins from 10 mm to 15 mm, to 20 mm, to the 95%- and 90% isodose of the delivered dose distribution with a median margin of 27 mm did moderately increase the proportion of relative in-field recurrence volume from 64% to 68%, 70%, 88% and 88% (p < 0.0001). Overall survival of patients with in-and out-field recurrence was similar (p = 0.7053). The only prognostic factor significantly associated with out-field recurrence was multifocality of recurrence (p = 0.0037). Cumulative incidences of in-field recurrences at 24 months were 60%, 22% and 11% for recurrences located within a 10 mm margin, outside a 10 mm margin but within the 95% isodose, or outside the 95% isodose (p < 0.0001). Survival from recurrence was improved after complete resection (p = 0.0069). Integrating these data into a concurrent-risk model shows that extending margins beyond 10 mm has only small effects on survival hardly detectable by clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of recurrences were observed within a 10 mm margin around the GTV. Smaller margins reduce normal brain radiation exposure allowing for more extensive salvage radiation therapy options in case of recurrence. Prospective trials using margins smaller than 20 mm around the GTV are warranted.

Impact of the Extremities Positioning on the Set-Up Reproducibility for the Total Marrow Irradiation Treatment.

Total marrow (lymph node) irradiation (TMI/TMLI) delivery requires more time than standard radiotherapy treatments. The patient's extremities, through the joints, can experience large movements. The reproducibility of TMI/TMLI patients' extremities was evaluated to find the best positioning and reduce unwanted movements. Eighty TMI/TMLI patients were selected (2013-2022). During treatment, a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed for each isocenter to reposition the patient. CBCT-CT pairs were evaluated considering: (i) online vector shift (OVS) that matched the two series; (ii) residual vector shift (RVS) to reposition the patient's extremities; (iii) qualitative agreement (range 1-5). Patients were subdivided into (i) arms either leaning on the frame or above the body; (ii) with or without a personal cushion for foot positioning. The Mann-Whitney test was considered (p < 0.05 significant). Six-hundred-twenty-nine CBCTs were analyzed. The median OVS was 4.0 mm, with only 1.6% of cases ranked < 3, and 24% of RVS > 10 mm. Arms leaning on the frame had significantly smaller RVS than above the body (median: 8.0 mm/6.0 mm, p < 0.05). Using a personal cushion for the feet significantly improved the RVS than without cushions (median: 8.5 mm/1.8 mm, p < 0.01). The role and experience of the radiotherapy team are fundamental to optimizing the TMI/TMLI patient setup.