[The multidirectional effects of thrombin and the possibility of their control in neurology]. / Raznonapravlennye effekty trombina na protsessy gemokoagulyatsii i vozmozhnost' ikh kontrolya v nevrologii.

The review presents the main physiological functions of thrombin. The procoagulant and anticoagulant activities of the key serine protease are discussed in both physiological and pathological conditions of hemostasis. The involvement of thrombin in atherogenesis, as well as its role as a mediator of vascular dysfunction and inflammation in both the peripheral and central nervous system, is highlighted. A pronounced imbalance between the pro- and anticoagulant systems leads to an increase in thrombin formation and creates conditions for the development of thrombosis. Tests that allow direct or indirect assessment of thrombin's functional activity are presented. The potential applications of direct thrombin inhibitors and direct blockers of thrombin PAR receptors in vascular neurology are also considered.

The Impact of Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Monoclonal Antibodies with and without Apheresis on Platelet Aggregation in Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is well known that elevated cholesterol is associated with enhanced platelet aggregation and patients suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have a high risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events. Although decreasing cholesterol level is associated with attenuation of platelet hyperactivity, there are currently no data on the effect of convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9ab) on platelet reactivity in FH. The aim of the study was to analyse the impact of different therapies including PCSK9ab on platelet aggregation in FH. METHODS: This study enrolled all 15 patients treated in the University Hospital Hradec Králové for FH. PCSK9ab have been administered in 12 of 15 patients while 8 patients were also undergoing lipid apheresis. Blood samples from all patients including pre- and post-apheresis period were tested for platelet aggregation triggered by 7 inducers, and the effect of 3 clinically used drugs (acetylsalicylic acid, ticagrelor and vorapaxar) was compared as well. RESULTS: Although apheresis decreased the reactivity of platelets in general, platelet responses were not different between non-apheresis patients treated with PCSK9ab and apheresis patients (post-apheresis values) with the exception of ristocetin. However, when compared to age-matched healthy population, FH patients had significantly lower platelet aggregation responses to 4 out of 7 used inducers and higher profit from 2 out of 3 used antiplatelet drugs even after exclusion of FH patients regularly receiving conventional antiplatelet treatment. CONCLUSION: This study showed for the first time the suitability of PCSK9ab treatment for reduction of platelet reactivity in FH patients.

Tubulovascular protection from protease-activated receptor-1 depletion during AKI-to-CKD transition.

BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic events are prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients due to increased thrombin generation leading to a hypercoagulable state. We previously demonstrated that inhibition of protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) by vorapaxar reduces kidney fibrosis. METHODS: We used an animal model of unilateral ischemia-reperfusion injury-induced CKD to explore the tubulovascular crosstalk mechanisms of PAR-1 in acute kidney injury (AKI)-to-CKD transition. RESULTS: During the early phase of AKI, PAR-1-deficient mice exhibited reduced kidney inflammation, vascular injury, and preserved endothelial integrity and capillary permeability. During the transition phase to CKD, PAR-1 deficiency preserved kidney function and diminished tubulointerstitial fibrosis via downregulated transforming growth factor-ß/Smad signaling. Maladaptive repair in the microvasculature after AKI further exacerbated focal hypoxia with capillary rarefaction, which was rescued by stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor and increased tubular vascular endothelial growth factor A in PAR-1-deficient mice. Chronic inflammation was also prevented with reduced kidney infiltration by both M1- and M2-polarized macrophages. In thrombin-induced human dermal microvascular endothelial cells (HDMECs), PAR-1 mediated vascular injury through activation of NF-κB and ERK MAPK pathways. Gene silencing of PAR-1 exerted microvascular protection via a tubulovascular crosstalk mechanism during hypoxia in HDMECs. Finally, pharmacologic blockade of PAR-1 with vorapaxar improved kidney morphology, promoted vascular regenerative capacity, and reduced inflammation and fibrosis depending on the time of initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings elucidate a detrimental role of PAR-1 in vascular dysfunction and profibrotic responses upon tissue injury during AKI-to-CKD transition and provide an attractive therapeutic strategy for post-injury repair in AKI.

Vorapaxar proven to be a promising candidate for pulmonary fibrosis by intervening in the PAR1/JAK2/STAT1/3 signaling pathway-an experimental in vitro and vivo study.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a lethal lung disease, and its 5-year mortality rate is even higher than the mortality rate of some cancers. Fibrosis can cause irreversible damage to lung structure and function. Treatment options for IPF remain limited, and there is an urgent need to develop effective therapeutic drugs. Protease activated receptor-1 (PAR-1) is a G-protein-coupled receptor and is considered a potential target for the treatment of fibrotic diseases. Vorapaxar is a clinically approved PAR-1 antagonist for cardiovascular protection. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential effect and mechanism of Vorapaxar on pulmonary fibrosis in vivo and in vitro. In the experimental animal model, Vorapaxar can effectively alleviate bleomycin (BLM)-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Treatment with 2.5, 5 or 10 mg/kg Vorapaxar once a day reduced the degree of fibrosis in a dose-dependent manner. The expression of fibronectin, collagen and α smooth muscle actin decreased significantly at the messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein levels in treated mice. In vitro, our results showed that Vorapaxar could inhibit the activation of fibroblasts induced by thrombin in a dose-dependent manner. In terms of mechanism, Vorapaxar inhibits the signal transduction of JAK2/STAT1/3 by inhibiting the activation of protease activated receptor 1, which reduces the expression of HSP90ß and the interaction between HSP90ß and transforming growth factor-ß (TGFß) receptor II and inhibits the TGFß/Smad signaling pathway. In conclusion, Vorapaxar inhibits the activation of pulmonary fibroblasts induced by thrombin by targeting protease activated receptor 1 and alleviates BLM-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice.

Epidemiology of heart failure hospitalization in patients with stable atherothrombotic disease: Insights from the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a growing public health problem and ischemic heart disease is an important risk factor. Understanding the epidemiology of HF in patients with atherosclerosis may help identify subgroups at greater risk who have the potential to derive greater benefit from preventive strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: The TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial randomized 26,449 patients with stable atherosclerosis to the antiplatelet agent vorapaxar versus placebo. Hospitalization for HF (HHF) endpoints were adjudicated from serious adverse events by blinded structured review using established definitions. HHF incidence was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Independent predictors of HHF risk were identified using multivariable logistic regression. The effect of vorapaxar on HHF risk was explored using Cox regression. The estimated incidence of HHF at 3 years was 1.6%. Independent predictors of HHF included prior HF (adjusted odds ratio [adj-OR]: 8.31; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.56-10.54), age (adj-OR [per 10 years]: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.47-1.89), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; adj-OR: 2.55; 95% CI: 2.01-3.24), polyvascular disease (two-territory disease, adj-OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.46-2.44; three-territory disease, adj-OR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.94-3.70), chronic kidney disease (CKD; adj-OR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.30-2.11), body mass index (BMI; adj-OR [per 5 kg/m2 ]: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.03-1.27), prior myocardial infarction (MI) (adj-OR: 1.35; 95% CI: 1.03-1.78), and hypertension (adj-OR: 1.44; 95% CI: 1.02-2.04). Patients who experienced HHF during follow-up had higher rates of subsequent rehospitalization and death. Vorapaxar did not modify the risk of HHF. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stable atherosclerosis, prior HF, age, T2DM, polyvascular disease, CKD, BMI, prior MI, and hypertension are important predictors of HHF risk.

Pleiotropic Effects of the Protease-Activated Receptor 1 (PAR1) Inhibitor, Vorapaxar, on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) and toll-like receptors (TLRs) are inflammatory mediators contributing to atherogenesis and atherothrombosis. Vorapaxar, which selectively antagonizes PAR1-signaling, is an approved, add-on antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention. The non-hemostatic, platelet-independent, pleiotropic effects of vorapaxar have not yet been studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cellular targets of PAR1 signaling in the vasculature were identified in three patient cohorts with atherosclerotic disease. Evaluation of plasma biomarkers (n = 190) and gene expression in endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) (n = 12) revealed that PAR1 expression correlated with endothelial activation and vascular inflammation. PAR1 colocalized with TLR2/4 in human carotid plaques and was associated with TLR2/4 gene transcription in EMBs. In addition, vorapaxar reduced atherosclerotic lesion size in apolipoprotein E-knock out (ApoEko) mice. This reduction was associated with reduced expression of vascular adhesion molecules and TLR2/4 presence, both in isolated murine endothelial cells and the aorta. Thrombin-induced uptake of oxLDL was augmented by additional TLR2/4 stimulation and abrogated by vorapaxar. Plaque-infiltrating pro-inflammatory cells were reduced in vorapaxar-treated ApoEko mice. A shift toward M2 macrophages paralleled a decreased transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. CONCLUSIONS: PAR1 inhibition with vorapaxar may be effective in reducing residual thrombo-inflammatory event risk in patients with atherosclerosis independent of its effect on platelets.

Efficacy and Safety of Vorapaxar by Intensity of Background Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights From the TRA2P-TIMI 50 Trial.

Background Patients with peripheral artery disease are at increased risk of both major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and limb events. The pathobiology of limb events is likely multifactorial. Observational studies suggest a benefit of statin therapy for reducing the risk of limb ischemic events while randomized trials demonstrate a benefit with more potent antithrombotic therapies, particularly those targeting thrombin. Whether the effects of these therapeutic pathways are independent and complementary is not known. Methods and Results The TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 (Thrombin Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 50) trial demonstrated that vorapaxar significantly reduced MACEs and limb events. The purpose of the current analysis was to evaluate the association of statin use and intensity and the occurrence of MACEs and limb events in 5845 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease randomized in TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 and then to understand whether statin use modified the benefits of vorapaxar for MACEs or limb ischemic events. We found that statin therapy was associated with significantly lower risk of MACEs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.89; P<0.001) and limb ischemic events (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89; P=0.002). The benefit of vorapaxar for reducing MACEs and limb events was consistent regardless of background statin (P-interaction=0.715 and 0.073, respectively). Event rates were lowest in patients receiving the combination of statin therapy and vorapaxar. Conclusions In conclusion, statin use and intensity is associated with significantly lower rates of MACEs and limb ischemic events. Thrombin inhibition with vorapaxar is effective regardless of background statin therapy. These results suggest that targeting both lipid and thrombotic risk in peripheral artery disease is necessary in order to optimize outcomes.

Factor Xa and thrombin induce endothelial progenitor cell activation. The effect of direct oral anticoagulants.

Factor Xa (FXa) and thrombin exert non-hemostatic cellular actions primarily mediated through protease-activated receptors (PARs). We investigated the effect of FXa and thrombin on human late-outgrowth endothelial cells (OECs), a type of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), and on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). The effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), rivaroxaban and dabigatran, was also studied. The membrane expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and the secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) were used as cell activation markers. FXa and thrombin increase the ICAM-1 expression and the MCP-1 secretion on both cells, being higher on OECs. Vorapaxar, a specific PAR-1 antagonist, completely inhibits FXa-induced activation of both cells and thrombin-induced HUVEC activation, but only partially thrombin-induced OEC activation. Furthermore, thrombin-receptor activating peptide; TRAP-6, only partially activates OECs. OECs do not membrane-express PAR-4, therefore it may not be involved on thrombin-induced OEC activation. Rivaroxaban and dabigatran inhibit OEC and HUVEC activation by FXa and thrombin, respectively. Rivaroxaban enhances thrombin-induced OEC and HUVEC activation, which is completely inhibited by vorapaxar. The inhibition of OEC and HUVEC activation by vorapaxar and DOACs may represent a new pleiotropic effect of these drugs. The pathophysiological and clinical significance of our findings need to be established.

Vorapaxar-modified polysulfone membrane with high hemocompatibility inhibits thrombosis.

Hemodialysis therapy is intended for patients suffering from renal insufficiency, pancreatitis, and other serious diseases. Platelets are an important active ingredient in the thrombosis induced by hemodialysis membranes. So far, there are few studies of hemodialysis membranes focusing on the effects of protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) activation on the platelet membrane. Among various antithrombotic agents, vorapaxar is a novel PAR1 inhibitor with high efficacy. In this study, we constructed a vorapaxar-modified polysulfone (VMPSf) membrane using immersion-precipitation phase transformation methods and characterized the microstructure in terms of hydrophilicity and mechanical properties. The water contact angle of the VMPSf membrane was 22.45% lower than that of the PSf membrane. A focused determination of platelet morphology was obtained using scanning electron microscopy. Meanwhile, we evaluated the effects of a VMPSf membrane on platelet adhesion. We observed that the VMPSf membrane could reduce the number of adhered platelets without altering their spherical or elliptical shape. The PAR1 levels in VMPSf membranes were 7.4 MFI lower than those in PSf membranes, suggesting that this modified membrane can effectively inhibit platelet activation. Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT, 5.3 s extension) and thrombin time (TT, 2.1 s extension) reflect good anticoagulant properties. Recalcification time (80.6 s extension) and fibrinogen adsorption (9.9 µg/cm2 reduction) were related to antithrombotic properties. To determine the biosafety of VMPSf membranes, we investigated antianaphylactic and anti-inflammatory properties in vitro and acute toxicity in vivo, it was obvious that C3a and C5a had decreased to 9.6 and 0.8 ng/mL, respectively. The results indicated that the VMPSf membrane has potential for clinical application.

Cholesterol-Rich Microdomains Contribute to PAR1 Signaling in Platelets Despite a Weak Localization of the Receptor in These Microdomains.

Platelet protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) is a cell surface G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that acts as a thrombin receptor promoting platelet aggregation. Targeting the PAR1 pathway by vorapaxar, a PAR1 antagonist, leads to a reduction in ischemic events in cardiovascular patients with a history of myocardial infarction or with peripheral arterial disease. In platelets, specialized microdomains highly enriched in cholesterol act as modulators of the activity of several GPCRs and play a pivotal role in the signaling pathway. However, their involvement in platelet PAR1 function remains incompletely characterized. In this context, we aimed to investigate whether activation of PAR1 in human platelets requires its localization in the membrane cholesterol-rich microdomains. Using confocal microscopy, biochemical isolation, and proteomics approaches, we found that PAR1 was not localized in cholesterol-rich microdomains in resting platelets, and only a small fraction of the receptor relocated to the microdomains following its activation. Vorapaxar treatment increased the level of PAR1 at the platelet surface, possibly by reducing its endocytosis, while its colocalization with cholesterol-rich microdomains remained weak. Consistent with a cholesterol-dependent activation of Akt and p38 MAP kinase in thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP)-activated platelets, the proteomic data of cholesterol-rich microdomains isolated from TRAP-activated platelets showed the recruitment of proteins contributing to these signaling pathways. In conclusion, contrary to endothelial cells, we found that PAR1 was only weakly present in cholesterol-rich microdomains in human platelets but used these microdomains for efficient activation of downstream signaling pathways following TRAP activation.

Platelet Protease Activated Receptor 1 Is Involved in the Hemostatic Effect of 20(S)-Protopanaxadiol by Regulating Calcium Signaling.

Panax notoginseng (Burk.) F.H. Chen has long been used to stop bleeding for hundreds of years in China. At present, only dencichine, notoginsenoside Ft1, and 20(S)-protopanaxadiol (PPD) showed hemostatic effect. However, the molecular mechanism of PPD on the platelet aggragetion needs to be further investigated. The study aims to evaluate the hemostatic effect of PPD and reveal its interacting targets using a series of experiments. In this study, the bleeding time was measured in mouse tail amputation and liver scratch models to evaluate hemostatic effect of PPD. The routine blood and plasma coagulation parameters in NS, HC, and PPD (2, 4, and 8 mg/kg) groups were measured using a blood analyzer. Platelet aggregation rate and ATP release were analyzed by a platelet aggregometer. Subsequently, the degranulation marker CD62P and PAC-1, and the concentrations of cytosolic Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i), cAMP, cGMP, and PAC-1 expressions were also assessed. We found that PPD shorted the bleeding time on the mouse tail amputation and liver scratch models and mainly increased blood platelet count in the rats after subcutaneous injection for 4 h. Meanwhile, PPD decreased APTT, increased FIB content, and directly induced platelet aggregation in vitro. In the absence of Ca2+, PPD induced the increase of [Ca2+]i and slightly increased the levels of CD62P and PAC-1. After the addition of 1 mM Ca2+, PPD treatment markedly promoted platelet activation by promoting ATP level, releasing CD62P and increasing PAC-1 binding in washed platelets. Excitingly, PPD-induced changes including platelet aggregation, decreased cAMP content, and the increases of CD62P and PAC-1 were significantly reversed by protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR-1) antagonist, vorapaxar, which showed similar function as thrombin. In addition, molecular docking analysis and ELISA assay demonstrated that PPD had a promising docking score with -6.6 kcal/mol and increased PAR-1 expression in human platelets, which indicated that PAR-1 is involved in PPD-induced platelet aggregation by regulating calcium signaling. Collectively, our study could provide the new insights of PPD as an essential hemostatic ingredient in Panax notoginseng for the treatment of hemorrhagic disease.

In silico identification of new inhibitors for ßeta-2-glycoprotein I as a major antigen in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome.

Beta 2 glycoprotein I (ß2GPI) is a major antigen for autoantibodies present in antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS). ß2GPI is a single polypeptide with five repeated domains and different conformations. The activated J-shaped conformation of ß2GPI binds to negatively charged phospholipids in the membrane via the fifth domain and causes blood clotting reactions. We applied a drug repurposing strategy using virtual screening and molecular dynamics to find the best FDA drugs against the fifth domain of ß2GPI. In the first phase, FDA drugs that had the most favorable ΔG with the fifth domain of ß2GPI were selected by virtual screening. Among these drugs that had the most favorable ΔG, Vorapaxar and Antrafenine were selected for molecular dynamics (MD) simulation studies. MD simulation was performed to evaluate the stability of Vorapaxar and Antrafenine complexes and the effect of the two drugs on protein conformation. Also, MD simulation was done to investigate the effect of Antrafenine and Vorapaxar on the binding of ß2GPI to the platelet model membrane. According to the results, Vorapaxar and Antrafenine were bound to the protein with the favorable binding energy (Vorapaxar and Antrafenine binding energies are - 49.641 and - 38.803 kcal/mol, respectively). In this study, it was shown that unlike protein alone and protein in the Antrafenine complex, the protein in the Vorapaxar complex was completely separated from the model membrane after 350 ns. Moreover, Vorapaxar led to more changes in the activated J-shape of ß2GPI. Thus, Vorapaxar can be a suitable candidate for further investigations on the treatment of APS.

Vorapaxar in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Vorapaxar specifically and effectively inhibits protease activated receptor-1 and may reduce thrombin-mediated ischemic events without interfering primary hemostasis. In the TRA-2P-TIMI 50 trial, vorapaxar reduced the risk of primary ischemic outcome but with increased bleeding risk. In the post hoc analysis, in patients with a history of myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, the net clinical outcome favored vorapaxar therapy with 10% reduction in cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, urgent coronary revascularization and moderate or severe bleeding. Based on these favorable results, vorapaxar was approved for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with prior myocardial infarction or with peripheral artery disease on top of standard antiplatelet therapy. A careful patient selection is needed to balance efficacy versus safety.

Pharmacodynamic Effects of Vorapaxar in Prior Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Potent Oral P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitors With and Without Aspirin: Results of the VORA-PRATIC Study.

Background Vorapaxar as an adjunct to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces thrombotic events in patients with prior myocardial infarction at the expense of increased bleeding. Withdrawal of aspirin has emerged as a bleeding reduction strategy. The pharmacodynamic effects of vorapaxar with potent P2Y12 inhibitors as well as the impact of dropping aspirin is unexplored and represented the aim of the VORA-PRATIC (Vorapaxar Therapy in Patients With Prior Myocardial Infarction Treated With Newer Generation P2Y12 Receptor Inhibitors Prasugrel and Ticagrelor) study. Methods and Results Post-myocardial infarction patients (n=130) on standard DAPT (aspirin+prasugrel or ticagrelor) were randomized to 1 of 3 arms: (1) triple therapy: aspirin+prasugrel/ticagrelor+vorapaxar; (2) dual therapy (drop aspirin): prasugrel/ticagrelor+vorapaxar; (3) DAPT: aspirin+prasugrel/ticagrelor. Pharmacodynamic assessments were performed at 3 time points (baseline and 7 and 30 days). Vorapaxar reduced CAT (collagen-ADP-TRAP)-induced platelet aggregation, a marker of platelet-mediated global thrombogenicity (triple therapy versus DAPT at 30 days: mean difference=-27; 95% CI,-35 to -19; P<0.001; primary end point). This effect was attenuated but still significant in the absence of aspirin (dual therapy versus DAPT at 30 days: mean difference=-15; 95% CI,-23 to -7; P<0.001; between-group comparisons, P<0.05). Vorapaxar abolished TRAP-induced aggregation (P<0.001), without affecting thrombin generation and clot strength. There were no differences in markers of P2Y12 reactivity. Markers sensitive to aspirin-induced effects increased (P<0.001) in the dual-therapy arm. Conclusions In post-myocardial infarction patients treated with potent P2Y12 inhibitors, vorapaxar reduces platelet-driven global thrombogenicity, an effect that persisted, albeit attenuated, in the absence of aspirin and without affecting markers of P2Y12 reactivity or clot kinetics. The clinical implications of these PD observations warrant future investigation. Registration URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02545933.

Design and synthesis of potent PAR-1 antagonists based on vorapaxar.

A series of novel vorapaxar analogues with different amino substitutes at the C-7, C-9a and aromatic substitutes at the C-4 position were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for their inhibitory activity to PAR-1. Several compounds showed good potency in antagonist activity based on the intracellular calcium mobilization assay and excellent pharmacokinetics profile in rats. Among these analogues, 3d exhibited excellent PAR-1 inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.18 µM) and the lower ability to cross the blood-brain barrier compared with vorapaxar (IC50 = 0.25 µM). Compound 3d has the potential to be developed as a new generation of PAR-1 antagonists with a better therapeutic window.

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of vorapaxar on arteriovenous fistula maturation.

BACKGROUND: Protease-activated receptor-1 antagonism by vorapaxar could facilitate arteriovenous fistula maturation but may increase bleeding risk. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the Vorapaxar Study for Maturation of arteriovenous fistula for Hemodialysis Access (VorapAccess) was to determine if vorapaxar improves arteriovenous fistula functional maturation in patients with end-stage renal disease. METHODS: VorapAccess was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind pilot trial comparing 2.5 mg vorapaxar per day with placebo for twelve weeks starting on day two after arteriovenous fistula creation. The primary outcome was time to functional maturation defined as successful cannulation for six hemodialysis sessions within three weeks. The planned sample size was 50 participants. The study was terminated early after withdrawal of planned financial support. Given the small number of randomized patients, we performed descriptive analyses without inference testing. RESULTS: A total of 13 participants were randomly allocated study drug (six vorapaxar and seven placebo). The median age was 56 years and seven participants (54%) were female. The median (minimum-maximum) days to functional maturation were 169 (77-287) days in the vorapaxar group and 145 (48-198) days in the placebo group. Six of the 13 (46%) participants had arteriovenous fistula functional maturation within 180 days; two of six (33%) in the vorapaxar group and four of seven (57%) in the placebo group. There was one bleeding event in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: Fewer than half of participants had functional maturation within 180 days after surgery, suggesting a major need for agents or strategies that enhance arteriovenous fistula maturation.

Effects of vorapaxar on clot characteristics, coagulation, inflammation, and platelet and endothelial function in patients treated with mono- and dual-antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND: Vorapaxar is indicated with standard antiplatelet therapy (APT) in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) or peripheral arterial disease (PAD). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the comparative effects of vorapaxar on platelet-fibrin clot characteristics (PFCC), coagulation, inflammation, and platelet and endothelial function during treatment with daily 81 mg aspirin (A), 75 mg clopidogrel (C), both (C + A), or neither. METHODS: Thrombelastography, conventional platelet aggregation (PA), ex vivo endothelial function by ENDOPAT, coagulation, platelet activation/inflammation marked by urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (UTxB2 ) and safety were determined in patients who were APT naïve (n = 21), on C (n = 8), on A (n = 29), and on A + C (n = 23) during 1 month of vorapaxar therapy and 1 month of offset. RESULTS: Vorapaxar had no effect on PFCC, ADP- or collagen-induced PA, thrombin time, fibrinogen, PT, PTT, von Willebrand factor (vWF), D-dimer, or endothelial function (P > .05 in all groups). Inhibition of SFLLRN (PAR-1 activating peptide)-stimulated PA by vorapaxar was accelerated by A + C at 2 hours (P < .05 versus other groups) with nearly complete inhibition by 30 days that persisted through 30 days after discontinuation in all groups (P < .001). SFLLRN-induced PA during offset was lower in APT patients versus APT-naïve patients (P < .05). Inhibition of UTxB2 was observed in APT-naive patients treated with vorapaxar (P < .05). Minor bleeding was only observed in C-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Vorapaxar had no influence on PFCC measured by thrombelastography, coagulation, or endothelial function irrespective of APT. Inhibition of protease activated receptor (PAR)-1 mediated platelet aggregation by vorapaxar was accelerated by A + C and offset was prolonged by concomitant APT. Vorapaxar-induced anti-inflammatory effects were observed in non-aspirin-treated patients.

Efficacy and safety of vorapaxar for secondary prevention in low body weight in patients with atherosclerosis: analyses from the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Trial.

BACKGROUND: Vorapaxar inhibits the thrombin-mediated activation of platelets, reduces thrombotic events in patients with myocardial infarction or peripheral arterial disease while increasing bleeding. In the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial, we observed a nominally significant interaction between low body weight and the reduced efficacy of vorapaxar. METHODS: We investigated the relationship between body weight and the efficacy and safety of vorapaxar within a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vorapaxar in patients with atherosclerosis. This analysis was performed among 20,138 patients with a clinical indication for vorapaxar. RESULTS: Compared with patients weighing 60 kg or more, patients weighing less than 60 kg were older, more frequently women, Asian and had renal insufficiency (each P<0.001). The efficacy of vorapaxar with respect to cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and stroke showed a significant interaction with patients' weight (Pinteraction<0.03). However among patients younger than 65 years, vorapaxar reduced the primary endpoint regardless of weight (weight ≥60 kg: 6.4% vs. 8.1%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.86; weight <60 kg: 5.4% vs. 7.2%, HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.37-1.49, Pinteraction=0.98). Among patients aged 65 years and older, the efficacy of vorapaxar diminished in patients weighing less than 60 kg (high weight: 10.4% vs. 12.6%, HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.95; low weight: 16.1% vs. 9.0%, HR 1.62, 95% CI 0.95-2.76, Pinteraction=0.01). The relative increase in bleeding with vorapaxar was not modified by weight (all Pinteraction>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Vorapaxar reduced vascular events and improved net clinical outcome regardless of body weight in younger patients. Elderly patients with low weight may not be good candidates for aggressive secondary prevention with vorapaxar added to standard therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique identifier: NCT00526474.

Pharmacological PAR-1 inhibition reduces blood glucose levels but does not improve kidney function in experimental type 2 diabetic nephropathy.

Vorapaxar-dependent protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 inhibition diminishes diabetic nephropathy in experimental type 1 diabetes. As most patients with diabetic nephropathy suffer from type 2 diabetes, the aim of this study was to investigate whether PAR-1 inhibition also limits diabetic nephropathy in experimental type 2 diabetes. Consequently, leptin-deficient black and tan brachyuric (BTBRob/ob) mice were randomly assigned to vorapaxar (1.75 mg/kg; twice weekly via oral gavage) or vehicle treatment, whereas matched wild-type (WT) BTBR (BTBRWT) mice served as nondiabetic controls. Weight and (nonfasting) blood glucose levels were monitored for up to 18 wk, after which kidney function and histologic damage was evaluated postmortem. We show that blood glucose levels and body weight increased in diabetic BTBRob/ob mice compared with nondiabetic BTBRWT controls. Vorapaxar-dependent PAR-1 inhibition reduced but did not normalize blood glucose levels in BTBRob/ob mice, whereas it potentiated the increase in body weight. Vorapaxar did not, however, preserve kidney function, whereas it only minimally reduced histopathological signs of kidney injury. Overall, we thus show that PAR-1 inhibition reduces blood glucose levels during the progression of diabetic nephropathy in experimental type 2 diabetes but does not improve renal function. This is in contrast to the therapeutic potential of vorapaxar in type 1 diabetes-induced nephropathy, highlighting the importance of disease-dependent treatment modalities.-Waasdorp, M., Florquin, S., Duitman, J., Spek, C. A. Pharmacological PAR-1 inhibition reduces blood glucose levels but does not improve kidney function in experimental type 2 diabetic nephropathy.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Addition to Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Prevention after Acute Coronary Syndromes: a Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) continues to evolve, many old practices proved to be of a little benefit and other approaches established the new pillars of modern medicine. Treating ACS patients with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for a year by combining aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel) has resulted in better outcomes and is currently the standard of therapy. However, owing to the persistent activation of the coagulation cascade, patients may continue to experience recurrent ischemia and high mortality rates despite compliance with the dual antiplatelet therapy. Research is underway to establish new treatment modalities for secondary prevention post-ACS, including the use of the novel direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple trials have been conducted to evaluate the use of DOACs for the secondary prevention after ACS. Recent emerging data showed that the addition of rivaroxaban in a very low dose of 2.5 mg twice daily to the regular DAPT regimen after ACS is beneficial in the reduction of major cardiovascular events, including recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and strokes. On the other hand, other DOACs, including apixaban, did not show similar efficacy and did not improve the cardiovascular outcomes. Patients who experience an ACS continue to suffer long-term consequences and thromboembolic complications. Many studies have shown that after the initial ACS event, patients remain in a hypercoagulable state and are more prone to recurrent ischemic attacks including stroke, recurrent MI, or unstable angina (UA). With the objective of seeking better outcomes, it is imperative to explore more aggressive anticoagulation strategies in ACS patients. In this article, we discuss the progress that was made and the limitations we face regarding the role of different anticoagulants in this setting.