Interventional Study on the Effectiveness of Eye Exercises Based on Composite Feedback Model in School-Age Children.

Objective: This study aims to explore the effects of eye exercises on the accommodative ability of Chinese school-aged children. Methods: This study used a convenience cluster sampling and selected 149 students from grades 2-5 in a Wenzhou primary school to participate in the intervention in June 2022. This study involved a one-month intervention teaching eye exercises using a composite feedback model. Assessments were made at 3 and 9 months post-intervention. Data collection occurred thrice, including a baseline and two follow-ups, measuring monocular and binocular accommodative facility, monocular and binocular accommodative amplitude, CISS scale, spherical equivalent refraction, and uncorrected visual acuity. Analysis used chi-square tests and generalized estimating equations to evaluate the exercises' effectiveness, with a significance threshold of P < 0.05. Results: 134 students completed the follow-up, including 61 females (45.52%). After teaching intervention, students showed significant improvements in the accuracy of manipulation, rhythm, acupoint location, strength effectiveness and rhythm of acupressure eye exercises (all P < 0.05), with increases of 10.37%, 13.03%, 16.96%, and 25.17%, respectively. Follow-up assessments revealed both monocular and binocular accommodative amplitude at T3 were significantly higher than at T1 and T2. Moreover, the binocular accommodative amplitude in the high-quality eye exercise group remained significantly higher than that in the low-quality group even(B=1.39,1.46, P < 0.01). Eye exercises could improve monocular and binocular accommodative amplitude in the short term(P < 0.05). High-quality eye exercises could alleviate visual fatigue (B=-2.00--3.49, both P < 0.05). However, eye exercises did not demonstrate any advantages in affecting spherical equivalent refraction or uncorrected visual acuity (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Eye exercises can alleviate myopia-related symptoms in Chinese children aged 7 to 11 years. However, this study did not find that eye exercises effectively reduce the degree of myopia in children. Trial Registration: The original trial (Registration site: https://www.chictr.org.cn/ Registration number: ChiCTR2300070903) was retrospectively registered on 26/04/2023.

Accommodative Facility and Response Time before and after Computer Task of Varying Durations in Young Adults.

Aim: To investigate the changes in near accommodative facility and response time in young adults following computer work of 30 minutes and 1 hour in duration. Methods: A total of 50 young adults (37 females, 13 males) with mean age of 20.68 ± 1.33 years were included in this experimental study. Monocular near accommodative facility was measured using ±2.00 Dioptre Sphere (DS) flipper at 40 cm using the N6 (the smallest print size that can be read by an individual with normal visual acuity) target before and after two reading tasks. Both pre- and post-task measurements were video recorded using a smart phone and the number of cycles per minute, positive response time (time taken to stimulate accommodation), and negative response time (time taken to relax accommodation) were calculated from the video recording. Data were analysed using SPSS Version 22.0. Results: Out of the 50 participants, 29 were emmetropes (Mean SER: 0.16 ± 0.29 D), and 21 were myopes (Mean SER: -1.89 ± 1.16 D). The mean pre-task accommodative facility was 6.79 ± 3.52 cycles per minute, and the post-task accommodative facility was 6.25 ± 3.65 cycles per minute (p = 0.10) for the 30-minutes task and 5.76 ± 3.89 cycles per minute (p = 0.01) for 1-hour task. The mean pre-task positive response time was 2.87 ± 1.55 seconds, and the post-task positive response times for 30 minutes and 1 hour were 2.86 ± 1.67 seconds (p = 0.88) and 2.98 ± 2.33 seconds (p = 0.42), respectively. The mean pre-task negative response time was 8.77 ± 8.83 seconds, and the post-task negative response times for 30 minutes and 1 hour task were 11.83 ± 14.28 seconds (p = 0.16) and 14.72 ± 17.32 seconds (p = 0.03), respectively. Conclusion: Monocular near accommodative facility was significantly reduced, and negative response time was delayed following 1 hour of computer work.

Immediate Effects of Vergence Exercises Using Automatic Dual Rotational Risley Prisms on Accommodative Lag and Facility.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated novel automatic dual rotational Risley prisms (ADRRPs) as a vergence exercise tool for patients with myopia to improve accommodative lag and accommodative facility. METHODS: Participants with myopia aged 20-24 years were recruited. After vergence exercises with prisms (treatment group) or plano lenses (control group) using ADRRPs for 10 min, measurements were taken using an open-field autorefractor (Grand Seiko WAM-5500) at viewing distances of 0.4 m and 6.0 m. We measured accommodative facility using a ± 2.00 D accommodative flipper. RESULTS: A total of 56 participants (treatment group, 39; control group, 17) performed vergence exercises using ADRRPs. Participants in the treatment group showed improvements in accommodative lag at a 0.4 m viewing distance, with measurements of 0.57 D (right eye; OD) and 0.53 D (left eye; OS) and 0.21 D (OD) and 0.27 D (OS) before and after the exercises, respectively (p < 0.001). Over-refractions using an open-field autorefractor with spherical equivalent contact lenses at a 6.0 m viewing distance were - 0.01 ± 0.30 D (OD) and 0.03 ± 0.34 D (OS) and 0.15 ± 0.32 D (OD) and 0.19 ± 0.28 D (OS) before and after the exercises, respectively (difference + 0.16 D; p < 0.001). Accommodative facility values before and after exercises were 14.88 ± 3.36 and 15.59 ± 3.60 cpm, respectively (p < 0.01). No significant differences in accommodative lag, relaxation, and accommodative facility before and after exercise were observed in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Using ADRRPs in vergence exercises can improve accommodative lag, accommodative facility, and accommodative relaxation in adults with myopia. Further research to evaluate persistent and long-term effects is needed.

Associations between Accommodative Facility, Age, and Refractive Errors in Early, Older Adolescent Myopes and Emmetropes.

Background: Accommodative functions are known to differ between myopes and emmetropes. It is not known whether accommodative facility differs at near between younger adolescent and older adolescent myopes and emmetropes. Aim: To examine whether accommodative facility differs at near between younger and older adolescent myopes and emmetropes. Methods: 119 participants aged between 11-21 years were recruited. Refractive error was measured using cycloplegic retinoscopy. Near monocular accommodative facility was measured for 60 seconds, using a +2.00D/-2.00D handheld flipper and N6 print at 40 cm. Participants were classified into two age groups: (i) younger adolescents (range: 11-14 years) and (ii) older adolescents (range: 15-21 years). The criterion applied to define myopia was spherical equivalent refraction: ≥-0.50D) and spherical equivalent refraction: -0.25D to +0.75D) for emmetropia. Univariate Analysis of Variance was carried out to analyze the interaction of age groups and refractive groups on near accommodative facility. Results: Near monocular accommodative facility was significantly lower (p = 0.003) in younger adolescents (5.87 ± 3.72 cpm) compared to older adolescents (8.11 ± 4.11 cpm), indicating age as a significant main effect (F1,115 = 13.44; p = 0.0001). Younger adolescent emmetropes (4.77 ± 2.05 cpm, p = 0.005) and younger adolescent myopes (6.48 ± 4.12 cpm, p = 0.022) had significantly lower monocular near accommodative facility compared to older adolescent emmetropes (9.52 ± 3.27 cpm), but did not show any difference when compared to older adolescent myopes (p > 0.05). This indicates a significant association linking age and refractive error to near accommodative facility (F1,115 = 4.60; p = 0.03). Conclusion: Younger adolescent myopes and younger adolescent emmetropes had reduced monocular near accommodative facility than older adolescent emmetropes, but not when compared to older adolescent myopes.

Dynamics of the accommodative response and facility with dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of using dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control on the dynamics of the accommodative response and facility. METHODS: 24 young adult myopes were fitted with dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control (MiSight®) and single-vision soft contact lenses (Proclear®). The WAM-5500 open-field autorefractor was used to measure the dynamics of the accommodative response (magnitude and variability) in binocular conditions, with accommodative data being gathered from the dominant eye, at three viewing distances (500 cm, 40 cm, and 20 cm) during 90 s. Also, the binocular accommodative facility was assessed with the WAM-5500 autorefractor. All participants performed the same experimental protocol with the dual-focus (MiSight) and single-vision (Proclear) soft contact lenses, with both experimental sessions being carried in two different days and following a counterbalanced order. RESULTS: This study showed greater lags of accommodation with the MiSight than the Proclear lenses at near distances (40 cm: 1.27 ± 0.77 vs. 0.68 ± 0.37 D, corrected p-value = 0.002, Cohen-d = 0.90; and 20 cm: 1.47 ± 0.84 vs. 1.01 ± 0.52 D, corrected p-value = 0.007, Cohen-d = 0.75), whereas a higher variability of accommodation was observed with the dual-focus than the single-vision lenses at 500 cm (0.53 ± 0.11 vs. 0.23 ± 0.10 D), 40 cm (0.82 ± 0.31 vs. 0.68 ± 0.37 D), and 20 cm (1.50 ± 0.56 vs. 1.15 ± 0.39 D) (corrected p-value < 0.001 in all cases, and Cohen-ds = 0.67-2.33). Also, a worse quantitative (27.75 ± 8.79 vs. 34.29 ± 10.08 cycles per minute, p = 0.029, Cohen-d = 0.48) and qualitative (23.68 ± 7.12 vs. 28.43 ± 7.97 score, p = 0.039, Cohen-d = 0.45) performance was observed with the MiSight when compared to the Proclear lenses. CONCLUSIONS: The use of dual-focus soft contact lenses for myopia control alters the dynamics of accommodative response and facility in the short-term. Although this optical design has demonstrated its effectiveness for myopia control, eye care specialists should be aware of the acute effects of these lenses on accommodation performance.

Diagnosis and Management of Post Traumatic Recurrent Unilateral Accommodative Spasm-A Case Report.

Spasm of accommodation refers to constant contraction of the ciliary muscles of the eye, which fail to relax. Neurological issues, head injury, and psychogenic factors can lead to spasm of accommodation, which is generally bilateral. This case report describes the clinical presentation of traumatic, unilateral accommodative spasm in an army person. A 26-year-old male presented with complaints of diminution of near vision in the left eye noticed accidentally. History revealed a blunt injury in the eyebrow region of the left eye two months back. His best corrected visual acuity was 6/6, 0.8 M (N6) in the right eye and 6/9, 2.5 M (N18) in the left eye. Accommodative response was documented using an open-field autorefractometer that showed asymmetry in the accommodation response and pupillary diameter between the two eyes. One percent Atropine sulfate eye ointment - twice a day for 3 days - was prescribed. On the fourth day, the spasm was resolved in the left eye. Pre- and post-Atropine administration, lens thickness measurements were documented, which showed significant changes. Accommodative facility exercise was initiated after the pharmacological management. Unilateral accommodative spasm is rare and needs careful investigations. Objective assessment of accommodative response and lens thickness measurement play a vital role in confirming the diagnosis.

Examining the Validity of a New Method for the Objective Assessment of Binocular Accommodative Facility (2Q-AF Test): A Comparison with ± 2.00 DS Lens Flippers.

PURPOSE: Recent technological advances have permitted to objectively record the accommodative response while shifting between two different levels of accommodation. This study is aimed at examining the concurrent validity of a new objective method for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of binocular accommodative facility, which is named 2Q-AF test, in comparison to the ±2.00 DS lens flippers. METHODS: Fifty-six individuals took part in this study (36 healthy young adults [24.4 ± 3.2 years] and 20 children [12.2 ± 0.4 years]). Participants randomly performed the 2Q-AF and the ±2.00 DS lens flipper tests. For the 2Q-AF test, a binocular open-field autorefractor was used to record the magnitude of accommodative response during a 60-sec period, while participants repeatedly changed fixation from a 5 m to a 40 cm chart when clarity of vision was achieved at each level. Due to the advantages of the proposed method, we have determined the number of cycles and the 2Q-AF score, with the latter also considering the accuracy of changes in accommodation. A standard procedure was followed for the ±2.00 DS flipper test. RESULTS: Our data exhibited a moderate association between the number of cycles with the ±2.00 DS lens flippers and the number of cycles in the 2Q-AF test in the group of young adults (p = .005, r = 0.46 [0.15-0.68]) and children (p = .007, r = 0.58 [0.19-0.81]), whereas a stronger relationship was observed when considering the number of cycles with the ±2.00 DS lens flippers and the 2Q-AF score (young adults: p < .001, r = 0.83 [0.69-0.91]; and children: p < .001, r = 0.78 [0.52-0.91]). CONCLUSIONS: The current findings show that the 2Q-AF test is a valid method for accommodative facility assessment, as suggested by its good levels of reliability and validity. This method allows to examine the accommodative facility in qualitative terms and solve most of the limitations associated with the ±2.00 DS lens flipper test.

Short-term effects of caffeine intake on binocular accommodative facility: a quantitative and qualitative analysis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Caffeine intake has been demonstrated to influence several physiological measures, including some related to eye physiology. The ability to focus at different distances is of paramount importance in real-world situations, and thus, the possible impact of caffeine intake on accommodative facility may have important clinical implications. BACKGROUND: This placebo-controlled, double-blind, balanced crossover study aimed to assess the acute effects of caffeine ingestion on the frequency and precision of the binocular accommodative facility. METHODS: Twenty university students (21.9 ± 3.4 years) ingested a capsule of caffeine (4 mg/kg) or placebo (300 mg of corn-starch) on two different days and counterbalanced order. The binocular accommodative facility was objectively assessed, using the WAM-5500 binocular open-field autorefractometer, after 60 min of capsule ingestion (caffeine/placebo). Perceived levels of activation was also assessed in each experimental condition. RESULTS: The ingestion of a single administration of caffeine (~ 4 mg/kg) causes an increase in the number of cycles performed per minute (p = 0.023, Cohen's d = 0.55), whereas no effects were observed for the mean magnitude of accommodative change between the far and near targets (p = 0.794), and the percentage of incorrect cycles of accommodation and dis-accommodation (p = 0.271 and 0.396, respectively). Participants reported a perceived level of activation of 6.8 ± 1.5 and 7.6 ± 1.8 in the placebo and caffeine conditions, respectively (p = 0.059). CONCLUSION: Caffeine intake improves quantitative, but not qualitative, measures of accommodative facility. These results corroborate the impact of caffeine on visual function and suggest that this ergogenic effect of caffeine may be used to enhance visual performance in applied situations.

Does coexisting accommodative dysfunction impact clinical convergence measures, symptoms and treatment success for symptomatic convergence insufficiency in children?

PURPOSE: To determine whether coexisting accommodative dysfunction in children with symptomatic convergence insufficiency (CI) impacts presenting clinical convergence measures, symptoms and treatment success for CI. METHODS: Secondary data analyses of monocular accommodative amplitude (AA; push-up method), monocular accommodative facility (AF; ±2.00 D lens flippers) and symptoms (CI Symptom Survey [CISS]) in children with symptomatic CI from the Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial (N = 218) and CITT-Attention and Reading Trial (N = 302) were conducted. Decreased AA was defined as more than 2D below the minimum expected amplitude for age (15 - » age); those with AA < 5 D were excluded. Decreased AF was defined as <6 cycles per minute. Mean near point of convergence (NPC), near positive fusional vergence (PFV) and symptoms (CISS) were compared between those with and without accommodative dysfunction using analysis of variance and independent samples t-testing. Logistic regression was used to compare the effect of baseline accommodative function on treatment success [defined using a composite of improvements in: (1) clinical convergence measures and symptoms (NPC, PFV and CISS scores) or (2) solely convergence measures (NPC and PFV)]. RESULTS: Accommodative dysfunction was common in children with symptomatic CI (55% had decreased AA; 34% had decreased AF). NPC was significantly worse in those with decreased AA (mean difference = 6.1 cm; p < 0.001). Mean baseline CISS scores were slightly worse in children with coexisting accommodative dysfunction (decreased AA or AF) (30.2 points) than those with normal accommodation (26.9 points) (mean difference = 3.3 points; p < 0.001). Neither baseline accommodative function (p ≥ 0.12 for all) nor interaction of baseline accommodative function and treatment (p ≥ 0.50) were related to treatment success based on the two composite outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A coexisting accommodative dysfunction in children with symptomatic CI is associated with worse NPC, but it does not impact the severity of symptoms in a clinically meaningful way. Concurrent accommodative dysfunction does not impact treatment response for CI.

Accommodative insufficiency in post-COVID-19 case with refractive error.

The aim of the case report is to present refractive error with accommodative insufficiency as a possible postinfectious manifestation of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Three weeks after the COVID-19 infection, a 22-year-old subject presented with blurring of distance and near vision with a frontal headache after prolonged near work. The patient was not using any refractive correction before the COVID-19 infection. This case report describes the diagnosis, management, and treatment of accommodative dysfunction in a patient with a history of COVID-19 infection.

Study on Binocular Accommodative Function in Children With Different Types of Intermittent Exotropia.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the monocular and binocular accommodative amplitude (AMP) and accommodative function (AF) in children with different types of intermittent exotropia (IXT). Methods: A total of 40 children with IXT were enrolled in the study. Monocular and binocular AMP and AF were measured using the modified approach method and the ±2D flip method, and the differences between the fixing and non-fixing eyes of non-strabismic children and children with different types of IXT were compared. Results: The AMP of the fixing eyes of children with IXT was lower than that of their non-fixing eyes (p = 0.007). Conversely, the AF was higher in the fixing eyes than in the non-fixing eyes (p < 0.001). The AMPs of each group of children with IXT were lower than those of the control group, while the AMP of the group with convergence insufficiency was lower than that of the other two groups with IXT. In addition, the AF of the group with convergence insufficiency was lower than that of the group with basic exotropia and the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: There is a difference in accommodation between the fixing and non-fixing eyes of children with IXT, and the degree of variation depends on the type of IXT. Moreover, the binocular accommodative function of children with IXT is lower than that of non-strabismic children.

Investigation of the Relationship Between Subjective Symptoms of Visual Fatigue and Visual Functions.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the severity of symptoms of visual fatigue might be associated with clinical visual measures and basic visual functions, such as accommodation, vergence, and contrast sensitivity. METHODS: In this study, 104 students were recruited (25 males, 79 females, Age 23.4 ± 2.5) for this study. Those with high myopia, strabismus, anisometropia, eye disease or history of ophthalmological surgery were excluded. The included subjects completed a questionnaire that assesses the severity of visual fatigue. Then, binocular accommodative facility, vergence facility and contrast sensitivity using a quick contrast sensitivity function approach were measured in a random sequence. Next, the correlations between each symptom of visual fatigue in the questionnaire and accommodative facility, vergence facility and contrast sensitivity were examined. RESULTS: Factor analysis indicated that visual fatigue, as captured by the scores of a subset of the questionnaire items, could be strongly related to binocular accommodative facility and binocular contrast sensitivity, but not to vergence facility. We also found that binocular accommodative facility and contrast sensitivity at high spatial frequencies are related. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that visual fatigue is related to the ability of human observers to encode visual details through their binocular vision.

Distribution of near Point of Convergence, near Point of Accommodation, Accommodative Facility and Refractive Errors in a Rural Population Living in Northern Iran.

Purpose: To evaluate near point of convergence (NPC), near point of accommodation (NPA), and accommodative facility (AF) in order to determine their normative data in a rural population.Methods: The target population for this population-based, cross-sectional study was people living in rural areas. Each subject underwent extensive optometric and ophthalmic examinations, including the measurement of visual acuity, refraction, NPA, NPC, and AF.Results: The data of 1113 individuals was analyzed of whom 58.8% (n = 576) were women. The mean age of the participants was 15.26 ± 7.38 years (range: 6-30 years). The mean spherical equivalent of the subjects was 0.16 ± 0.63 D. The prevalence of myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism was 16.28% (13.97-18.58), 5.97% (4.49-7.44), 11.93% (9.91-13.95) in this study, respectively The mean and 95% confidence interval of NPC, NPA, and binocular accommodative facility (BAF) was 6.99 cm (6.84-7.15), 9.91 cm (9.71-10.11), and 9.84 cpm (9.63-10.06), respectively. A significant correlation was found between age and the parameters such that all evaluated parameters worsened significantly with age (P < .001).Conclusion: The results of the present study showed the normal ranges of NPA, NPC, and BAF in a 6-30 year-old population living in rural areas of northern Iran. These parameters changed significantly with age.

Changes in accommodation dynamics after alcohol consumption, for two different doses.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate possible changes in accommodation dynamics caused by the intake of different doses of alcohol. METHODS: A total of 20 emmetropic subjects took part in the study. This involved a baseline session, a session after consuming 300 ml of red wine, and another after consuming 450 ml of the same wine. The accommodation dynamics were characterized for two target vergences (2.5D and 5.0D) using the Grand Seiko WAM-5500 autorefractor, which provided the accommodation and disaccommodation variables. The accommodative facility was measured using flippers of ± 2.00 D. RESULTS: The mean accommodation velocities and velocity peaks were significantly lower after consuming alcohol for the higher intake, particularly for 5.0D (p < 0.05). The response time was significantly higher only for the high-intake condition for 5.0D (p < 0.05). The accommodative microfluctuations were significantly higher for both target vergences for the high-intake condition (p < 0.05). The accommodative facility was significantly impaired in both intake conditions (p < 0.05). The breath alcohol content (BrAC) was correlated with the deterioration of some variables: the accommodative facility (ρ = 0.490), and the velocity peak for 2.5D (ρ = 0.349) and 5.0D (ρ = 0.387). CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol intake affects accommodation dynamics, causing deterioration in the mean velocity, velocity peak, response time, accommodative microfluctuations, and accommodative facility, especially for the target vergence of 5.0D and high alcohol dosages.

Accommodation changes after strabismus surgery due to anterior ciliary vessel disruption.

PURPOSE: To evaluate monocular accommodation changes after strabismus surgery with and without anterior ciliary vessel preservation. METHODS: Sixty patients with horizontal concomitant strabismus who were scheduled to undergo monocular strabismus surgeries were randomly divided into two groups: A (without anterior ciliary vessel preservation) and B (with anterior ciliary vessel preservation). Group A was further divided into groups A1 (surgical eyes without anterior ciliary vessel preservation) and A2 (corresponding nonsurgical eyes). Group B was further divided into groups B1 (surgical eyes with anterior ciliary vessel preservation) and B2 (corresponding nonsurgical eyes). Monocular accommodative amplitude (AA) and accommodative facility (AF) were evaluated before and 1 day after the surgery to assess accommodation. RESULTS: In groups A2, B1, and B2, the AA and AF values showed no significant difference preoperatively or postoperatively. However, compared with preoperative values, both the postoperative AA and AF values were significantly reduced in group A1. CONCLUSION: Strabismus surgery without anterior ciliary vessel preservation reduces monocular accommodation, whereas strabismus surgery with anterior ciliary vessel preservation protects accommodation.

Effectiveness of vergence/accommodative therapy for accommodative dysfunction in children with convergence insufficiency.

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy for improving accommodative amplitude and accommodative facility in children with symptomatic convergence insufficiency and accommodative dysfunction. METHODS: We report changes in accommodative function following therapy among participants in the Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial - Attention and Reading Trial with decreased accommodative amplitude (115 participants in vergence/accommodative therapy; 65 in placebo therapy) or decreased accommodative facility (71 participants in vergence/accommodative therapy; 37 in placebo therapy) at baseline. The primary analysis compared mean change in amplitude and facility between the vergence/accommodative and placebo therapy groups using analyses of variance models after 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks of treatment. The proportions of participants with normal amplitude and facility at each time point were calculated. The average rate of change in amplitude and facility from baseline to week 4, and from weeks 4 to 16, were determined in the vergence/accommodative therapy group. RESULTS: From baseline to 16 weeks, the mean improvement in amplitude was 8.6 dioptres (D) and 5.2 D in the vergence/accommodative and placebo therapy groups, respectively (mean difference = 3.5 D, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5 to 5.5 D; p = 0.01). The mean improvement in facility was 13.5 cycles per minute (cpm) and 7.6 cpm in the vergence/accommodative and placebo therapy groups, respectively (mean difference = 5.8 cpm, 95% CI: 3.8 to 7.9 cpm; p < 0.0001). Significantly greater proportions of participants treated with vergence/accommodative therapy achieved a normal amplitude (69% vs. 32%, difference = 37%, 95% CI: 22 to 51%; p < 0.0001) and facility (85% vs. 49%, difference = 36%, 95% CI: 18 to 55%; p < 0.0001) than those who received placebo therapy. In the vergence/accommodative therapy group, amplitude increased at an average rate of 1.5 D per week during the first 4 weeks (p < 0.0001), then slowed to 0.2 D per week (p = 0.002) from weeks 4 to 16. Similarly, facility increased at an average rate of 1.5 cpm per week during the first 4 weeks (p < 0.0001), then slowed to 0.6 cpm per week from weeks 4 to 16 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Office-based vergence/accommodative therapy is effective for improving accommodative function in children with symptomatic convergence insufficiency and coexisting accommodative dysfunction.

Accommodative Insufficiency: Prevalence, Impact and Treatment Options.

PURPOSE: Accommodative insufficiency (AI), defined as the inability to stimulate accommodation in pre-presbyopic individuals, has gained much attention over recent years. Despite the enormity of the available information, there is a significant lack of clarity regarding the criteria for definition, methodology adopted for testing and diagnosis, and the varied prevalence across the globe. This review aims to gather evidence that is pertinent to the prevalence, impact and efficacy of available treatment options for AI. METHODS: PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Collaboration search engines were used with the keywords prevalence, accommodative insufficiency, symptoms, plus lens, vision therapy and treatment. Peer-reviewed articles published between 1992 and 2019 were included in the review. After reviewing the studies for study methodology and robustness, 83 articles were chosen for this literature review. RESULTS: The prevalence of AI ranges between <1.00% and 61.6% across studies. The prevalence shows considerable variation across ethnicities and age groups. There is significant variation in the study methodology, diagnostic criteria and number of tests performed to arrive at the diagnosis. Not many studies have explored the prevalence beyond 20 years of age. The prevalence of AI is high among children with special needs. There is no high-quality evidence regarding the standard treatment protocol for AI. Both vision therapy and low plus lenses have shown efficacy in independent studies, and no studies have compared these two treatment options. CONCLUSION: The understanding of AI prevalence is currently limited owing to the lack of a standard set of diagnostic criteria and wide variations in the study methodology. There is a lack of high-quality evidence suggesting the best possible treatment for AI. The current gaps in the literature have been identified and future scope for exploration is elucidated.

Validation of an Objective Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Binocular Accommodative Facility.

Purpose: Assessing binocular accommodative facility (BAF) enables the evaluation of the interaction between the accommodative and vergence systems, which is relevant for the diagnosis of accommodative and binocular disorders. However, the tests used to assess BAF present methodological caveats (e.g., lack of objective control, vergence demands, and image size alterations), limiting its external validity. This study aimed to (i) develop a new objective method to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the BAF in free-viewing conditions, and explore its validity by the comparison with the Hart Chart test, and (ii) assess the inter-session reliability of the proposed method.Methods: 33 healthy young adults took part in this study. We used a binocular open-field autorefractor to continuously assess the magnitude of accommodative response during a 60-sec period, while participants repeatedly changed fixation from a far to a near chart when clarity of vision was achieved at each level. Accommodative response data were used to characterize the BAF measurement in quantitative (number of cycles) and qualitative terms (percentage of times that correctly accommodating or dis-accommodating in each level of accommodation as well as the magnitude of the accommodative change).Results: Our data revealed that the new proposed method accurately counted the number of cycles per minute when compared with the Hart Chart test (p = .23, ES = 0.02; mean difference = 0.18 ± 0.85). The inter-session reliability of the proposed method was demonstrated to be excellent (Pearson r and intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.95 to 0.98) for the parameters obtained with the BAF test.Conclusions: The present outcomes evidence that the proposed objective method allows to accurately assess the frequency and precision of BAF by the combination of the classical Hart Chart test and a binocular open-field autorefractometer. Our findings may be of relevance for the diagnosis and treatment of accommodative and binocular disorders.

The role of clinical diagnosis criteria on the frequency of accommodative insufficiency.

AIM: To estimate and compare the frequency of accommodative insufficiency (AI) within the same clinical population sample depending on the type of clinical criteria used for diagnosis. Comparing the frequency within the same population would help to minimize bias due to sampling or methodological variability. METHODS: Retrospective study of 205 medical records of symptomatic subjects free of any organic cause and symptoms persisting despite optical compensation evaluated. Based on the most commonly clinical diagnostics criteria found in the literature, four diagnostics criteria were established for AI (I, II, III and IV) based on subjective accommodative tests: monocular accommodative amplitude two or more diopters below Hofstetter's minimum value [15-(0.25×age)] (I, II, III, IV); failing monocular accommodative facility with minus lens, establishing the cut-off in 0 cycles per minute (cpm) (I) and in 6 cpm (II, III); failing binocular accommodative facility with minus lens, establishing the cut-off in 0 cpm (I) and in 3 cpm (II). RESULTS: The proportion of AI (95%CI) for criteria I, II, III and IV were 1.95% (0.04%-3.86%), 2.93% (0.31%-4.57%), 6.34% (1.90%-7.85%) and 41.95% (35.14%-48.76%) respectively, with a statistically significant difference shown between these values (χ2 =226.7, P<0.001). A pairwise multiple comparison revealed that the proportion of AI detected for criterion IV was significantly greater than the proportion for the rest of the criteria (P-adjusted<0.05 in all cases). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of cases of AI within the same clinical population varies with the clinical diagnostic criteria selected. The variation is statistically significant when considering the monocular accommodative amplitude as the only clinical diagnostic sign.

The influence of vergence facility on binocular eye movements during reading.

Optometrists regularly use binocular measurements in patients with asthenopic complaints when performing close-up work. The focus of this work was therefore on the correlation of optometric parameters and objective fixation disparity (FD) measured by an eye tracker. In our investigation, 20 participants (6 male, 14 female) were subjected to a classical optometric procedure. Subsequently, these subjects read various sentences on a screen and eye movements were registered by using a RED500 eye tracker. The experiment was performed under two reading distance conditions. In order to be comparable with previous work, the present study was conducted under dark illumination conditions [12]. FD values were deduced from objective eye tracking data during reading. Data analysis was done using linear mixed-effects models. FD was found to depend on vergence facility (t=3.3, p=0.004). Subjects with a low vergence facility showed more eso fixation disparity than subjects with a normal vergence facility. If studies of binocular coordination using eye tracking methods are performed under dark illumination conditions, vergence facility is an important parameter and should be accounted for. Neglecting this parameter may mask other important parameters. Vergence facility in context of reading difficulties may be important.