Appendectomy: Cross-sectional study of the effects of COVID-19 in a hospital in South Brazil.

Background: COVID-19 has further burdened the Brazilian healthcare system, especially emergencies. Patients may have delayed seeking care for surgical abdominal pain. Delays in the approach may have impacted clinical evolution and outcomes. This study evaluated appendectomies and their complications performed by the public system during one-year follow-up of COVID-19 in a hospital in southern Brazil. Materials and methods: In this hospital-based cross-sectional study, we included adult patients who underwent appendectomy from March 2019 to April 2021 (n = 162). Patients were divided into pre-pandemic (n = 78) and pandemic (n = 84) groups based on the surgery date. The analyzed variables included hospitalization duration, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, surgical approach, histopathological findings, COVID-19 testing, patient outcomes, and 30-day survival rate. Results: The cohorts exhibited similar epidemiology, with the sex ratio and average age being maintained. No statistical difference was found in the 30-day survival rate and clinical outcomes. Of the four patients admitted to the ICU, three belonged to the pandemic cohort and tested negative for COVID-19. Only 47.6 % of the patients in the pandemic cohort underwent COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction examination; one tested positive (2.5 %). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there was no increased risk for appendectomies during the first wave of the pandemic. Surgeries were safe during this period. Patients continued to access the emergency service despite surgical abdominal pain and restrictive measures imposed by health authorities. The similar results observed across cohorts are attributed to the readiness of the teams and the availability of medical surgical equipment in safe quantities.

An Uncommon Consequence of Perforated Acute Appendicitis in Elderly Patients: Fournier's Gangrene.

Acute appendicitis that is not diagnosed and treated promptly typically results in serious complications that raise the risk of necrotizing fasciitis, particularly in elderly patients. We present a case of a 77-year-old male, who presented to the emergency department with a clinical manifestation of Fournier's gangrene caused by acute perforated appendicitis. The patient had no symptoms or signs of an acute abdomen, and within three days he developed significant unilateral scrotal swelling and skin changes. Our case demonstrates the need to treat Fournier's gangrene as a consequence of an intra-abdominal infectious disease, particularly in elderly comorbid patients with atypical symptoms of acute appendicitis, and highlights the importance of early surgical intervention.

Acute appendicitis induced by bone fragment ingestion: A pediatrics case report.

Acute appendicitis is an ordinary surgical emergency, typically attributed to luminal obstruction by fecaliths or lymphoid hyperplasia. However, ingested foreign bodies as an etiology are rare but increasingly recognized, particularly in pediatric patients. We present the case of a 9-year-old male patient who presented to the emergency department with symptoms consistent with acute appendicitis. Further investigation revealed the presence of a bone fragment within the appendix, leading to acute inflammation. Foreign body ingestion should be considered in pediatric patients with acute appendicitis. This case report underscores the importance of comprehensive clinical evaluation and appropriate diagnostic imaging modalities in guiding optimal treatment strategies.

Primary omental torsion with clinical masquerading as acute appendicitis and radiological key for diagnosis.

Omental torsion is a medical condition characterized by the twisting of the omentum along its longitudinal axis, which leads to compromised blood flow. This condition is rarely diagnosed before surgery and can present symptoms similar to other causes of acute surgical abdomen. This report details a case of primary omental torsion initially suspected to be acute appendicitis. The patient was admitted to the hospital with symptoms of lower right quadrant abdominal pain and mild fever. Computed tomography imaging revealed a twisted mass of fatty tissue with surrounding fat stranding changes, but no signs of appendicitis were found, indicating omental torsion. The patient underwent surgery to remove the twisted and necrotic omentum, leading to an improvement in symptoms. This case highlights the challenges in diagnosis and the crucial role of computed tomography imaging in managing this rare condition.

Non-Operative Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Children: Can Patients Be Discharged From the Emergency Department?

INTRODUCTION: Non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children is a safe alternative to laparoscopic appendectomy. The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility of nonoperative outpatient management of uncomplicated appendicitis in pediatric patients. METHODS: A standardized pathway for non-operative outpatient management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children (NOMA-C) was implemented in a university pediatric surgery practice starting October 2021. Those who met criteria would be considered for discharge from the emergency department (ED) with oral antibiotics and close followup over the following year. A quality improvement project started concurrently to monitor patients for recurrent symptoms of appendicitis. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were diagnosed with acute appendicitis during the study period (October 2021 to April 2023). Forty-five children (38%) met criteria for the NOMA-C protocol, and 11 patients/families chose appendectomy. Of the 34 patients who pursued nonoperative management, 14 patients were admitted to the hospital and 20 patients were discharged from the ED. Total time in the ED/hospital was significantly shorter for patients discharged from the ED (7 hours versus 23 hours; p<0.001). At one year follow up only 4 (12%) had undergone appendectomy. There were no adverse events for patients who underwent nonoperative management. CONCLUSION: A protocol offering non-operative management of appendicitis with an option for outpatient management was feasible and safe. Outpatient management was associated with shorter ED/hospital stays than those admitted. Future studies should evaluate whether this protocol can be adopted by EDs without pediatric surgery services to avoid the need for transfer.

A rare case of superior mesenteric venous and portal vein thrombosis in complicated appendicitis.

Superior mesenteric venous (SMV) thrombosis is a rare complication of severe appendicitis. Early recognition is due to improved imaging modalities, which ultimately lead to more prompt intervention. Despite being an uncommon phenomenon, SMV thrombosis can have complications stemming from venous hypertension, such as gastric and esophageal varices, bowel ischemia, sepsis, and death. As this is a rare phenomenon, specific treatment guidelines and algorithms are lacking in the current literature. This case report describes a 23-year-old male patient whose recovery from a laparoscopic appendectomy was complicated with both an SMV and portal vein thrombosis.

Indication of conservative treatment by antibiotics for uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is one of the most common emergency abdominal disease, and recent studies have evaluated conservative treatment using antibiotics for uncomplicated appendicitis. Although the efficacy of conservative treatment for uncomplicated appendicitis is known, its efficacy for complicated appendicitis remains unknown, so are risk factors for the conservative treatment of appendicitis. In our institution, conservative treatment has long been the first choice for most appendicitis cases, except for perforation. Therefore, this novel study investigated the outcomes of conservative treatment for uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis and the risk factors associated with conservative treatment. AIM: To investigate the indication of conservative treatment by antibiotics for uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis. METHODS: We investigated 270 patients who received conservative treatment for acute appendicitis at the Nishitokyo Central General Hospital, between April 2011 and February 2022. Twenty-eight (10.3%) patients were resistant to conservative treatment and underwent surgery. We retrospectively investigated the outcomes of conservative treatment for appendicitis and the risk factors for resistance to conservative treatment using the receiver operating characteristic curves and Cox hazard model. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-two (89.7%) patients improved with conservative treatment. The significant and independent predictors of resistance to conservative treatment were body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C, appendicolith and Douglas sinus fluid visible on computed tomography (CT). The rate of resistance to conservative treatment was 66.7% (6/9) for patients with the above three factors, 22.9% (8/35) for patients with two factors (appendicolith and body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C), 16.7% (2/12) for patients with two factors (Douglas sinus fluid and appendicolith) and 11.1% (1/9) for patients with two factors (Douglas sinus fluid and body temperature ≥ 37.3 °C). CONCLUSION: A temperature ≥ 37.3 °C, appendicolith and Douglas sinus fluid on CT might be clinical risk factors of resistance to conservative treatment for acute appendicitis.

Silent but Significant: A Case Report of Appendiceal Mucocele.

Appendiceal mucocele is a rare disease that can sometimes mimic acute appendicitis or be discovered accidentally during surgeries. The clinical presentation of appendiceal mucocele is observed as lumen distension due to mucin accumulation. This condition has both benign and malignant underlying etiologies, which can be confirmed by histopathological examination. Acute presentation of appendiceal mucocele is rare and mostly resembles the symptoms of acute appendicitis. The treatment of appendiceal mucocele is crucial due to the risk of pseudomyxoma peritonei caused by the spread of mucus, mucocele perforation, or the presence of malignancy such as mucinous carcinoma. Surgical resection, either appendicectomy, typhlectomy, or sometimes right hemicolectomy, is the recommended management approach. This is a case of a 74-year-old male with pain in the abdomen as the major presenting complaint. He had a palpable right iliac fossa mass. The diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele was made by contrast-enhanced computed tomography, which was later confirmed by histopathology. The patient underwent surgical resection and was doing well at the three-month follow-up.

The incidence of incidental neoplasia in pathology samples of patient who underwent appendectomy due to acute appendicitis. A single center experience: 6446 cases.

PURPOSE: Appendectomy is the standard treatment of acute appendicitis. However, recent advancements have introduced medical treatment as a potential alternative. Within this context, it's important to recognize the rare occurrence of appendiceal tumors, often incidentally discovered during histopathological examination following appendectomy. Consequently, there's a concern about the possibility of overlooking appendiceal neoplasms, particularly in cases where conservative treatment for acute appendicitis is considered. METHODS: The files of patients who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis between January 2015 and December 2023 and were diagnosed with neoplasia in their pathology reports were retrospectively registered. Demographic characteristics of the patients, laboratory and imaging features, details of the surgery performed, preoperative and intraoperative suspicion of neoplasm and data from pathology reports were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 6446 patients were operated for acute appendicitis. Neoplasia was detected in the histopathological examination of 93 patients (1.44%). Acute appendicitis was diagnosed in 51.6% of the patients by computed tomography. Neoplasm suspicion was present in 9.7% of patients in preoperative imaging methods and in 6.5% of patients intraoperatively. Only appendectomy was performed in 94.5% of patients. The most common appendiceal neoplasm is neuroendocrine tumors (40.9%), followed by appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (29%), sessile serrated adenoma (15%), and adenocarcinoma (6.5%). CONCLUSION: Although appendiceal neoplasms are relatively rare in proportion, they represent a significant numerical value due to the density of cases. Therefore, this information should be taken into consideration when evaluating treatment options for acute appendicitis.

Assessment of diagnostic value of ultrasound and multi-slice spiral computed tomography in acute appendicitis: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Ultrasound and multi-slice spiral computed tomography (CT) are frequently used to assist the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA), and the examination results may vary among different demographics. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and CT for AA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with AA who underwent emergency surgery at our hospital from March 2021 to August 2023, with postoperative pathological results as the gold standard. Differences in the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and CT for different types of AA, age groups, and body mass index (BMI) values were then analyzed. RESULTS: The overall sample comprised 279 confirmed cases of AA, with 64 cases of simple appendicitis, 127 cases of suppurative appendicitis, and 88 cases of gangrenous appendicitis. For these three pathological classifications, the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound was 68.75% (44/64), 73.22% (93/127), and 81.81% (72/88), respectively, while the diagnostic accuracy of CT was 71.87% (46/64), 82.67% (105/127), and 90.90% (80/88), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall diagnostic accuracy between the two methods (P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed no difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two methods for patients with normal BMI (P > 0.05). However, for overweight, obese, and elderly patients, CT provided significantly better diagnostic accuracy than ultrasound (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: While ultrasound and CT have similar diagnostic accuracy for different pathological types of AA, CT is more accurate for overweight, obese, and elderly patients.

[Factors associated with normal leukocyte count and C-reactive protein in adults with acute appendicitis: a retrospective cohort study]. / Faktory, svyazannye s normal'nym kolichestvom leikotsitov i urovnem S-reaktivnogo belka u vzroslykh bol'nykh s ostrym appenditsitom: retrospektivnoe kogortnoe issledovanie.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors associated with normal leukocyte count and C-reactive protein (CRP) in adults with acute appendicitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included patients aged 18-60 years after surgeries for acute appendicitis. Convenience sampling was used to select medical records, and variables such as age, sex, weight, height, origin, self-medication, diabetes (DM2), high blood pressure (HBP), type of appendicitis, duration of illness, preoperative time, type of appendectomy, operative time, and hospital stay were analyzed. Patients were categorized into those with normal and abnormal inflammatory parameters. The SPSS version 28 software was used for analysis. RESULTS: We included 333 patients; 11.11% ones had normal inflammatory parameters. Both groups had mean age of approximately 33 years. Men comprised 56.76% and 57.43%in both groups, respectively. The abnormal group had shorter mean preoperative time, and catarrhal appendicitis was more common in the normal group. Multivariate analysis revealed that rural origin and self-medication were significantly associated with normal inflammatory parameters. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of normal inflammatory parameters in acute appendicitis patients was 11.11%. Rural origin, self-medication, shorter preoperative time, and catarrhal appendicitis were significantly associated with normal inflammatory parameters in this context.

Evaluation of the clinical effects of atropine in combination with remifentanil in children undergoing surgery for acute appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common cause of acute abdomen in children. Anesthesia significantly influences the surgical treatment of AA in children, making the scientific and effective selection of anesthetics crucial. AIM: To assess the clinical effect of atropine (ATR) in combination with remifentanil (REMI) in children undergoing surgery for AA. METHODS: In total, 108 cases of pediatric AA treated between May 2020 and May 2023 were selected, 58 of which received ATR + REMI [research group (RG)] and 50 who received REMI [control group (CG)]. Comparative analyses were conducted on the time to loss of eyelash reflex, pain resolution time, recovery time from anesthesia, incidence of adverse events (AEs; respiratory depression, hypoxemia, bradycardia, nausea and vomiting, and hypotension), intraoperative responses (head shaking, limb activity, orientation recovery, safe departure time from the operating room), hemodynamic parameters [oxygen saturation (SPO2), mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate], postoperative sedation score (Ramsay score), and pain level [the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale]. RESULTS: Compared with the CG, the RG showed significantly shorter time to loss of eyelash reflex, pain resolution, recovery from anesthesia, and safe departure from the operating room. Furthermore, the incidence rates of overall AEs (head shaking, limb activity, etc.) were lower, and influences on intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and stress response indexes were fewer. The Ramsay score at 30 min after extubation and the FLACC score at 60 min after extubation were significantly lower in the RG than in the CG. CONCLUSION: ATR + REMI is superior to REMI alone in children undergoing AA surgery, with a lower incidence of AEs, fewer influences on hemodynamics and stress responses, and better post-anesthesia recovery.

Is appendoscope a new option for the treatment of acute appendicitis?

Acute appendicitis is a common surgical emergency. It is commonly caused by obstruction of the appendiceal lumen due to fecaliths, tumors, or lymphoid hyperplasia. For over a century, appendectomy has been the primary treatment for acute appendicitis. Abraham Groves performed the first open appendectomy in 1883. In 1983, Kurt Semm completed the first laparoscopic appendectomy, heralding a new era in appendectomy. However, appendectomy is associated with certain complications and a rate of negative appendectomies. Studies have suggested controversy over the impact of appendectomy on the development of inflammatory bowel disease and Parkinson's disease, but an increasing number of studies indicate a possible positive correlation between appendectomy and colorectal cancer, gallstones, and cardiovascular disease. With the recognition that the appendix is not a vestigial organ and the advancement of endoscopic te-chnology, Liu proposed the endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy. It is an effective minimally invasive alternative for treating uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Our team has developed an appendoscope with a disposable digital imaging system operated through the biopsy channel of a colonoscope and successfully applied it in the treatment of appendicitis. This article provides an overview of the progress in endoscopic treatment for acute appendicitis and offers a new perspective on the future direction of appendiceal disease treatment.

Prognostic value of 24-hour cultivation of peritoneal fluid to distinguish complicated from uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The distinction between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis (AA) is important as it guides postoperative antibiotic treatment. A diagnosis based on intraoperative findings is imprecise and standard cultivation of peritoneal fluid is generally time-consuming with little clinical benefit. The aim of this study was to examine if cultivation of peritoneal fluid in acute appendicitis could reliably detect bacteria within 24 h. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy were prospectively enrolled at two surgical departments after informed consent was obtained. Periappendicular fluid was collected prior to appendectomy and sent for cultivation. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using 72-hour cultivation results as the gold standard. Patients with complicated AA as determined by the surgeon, received a three-day course of oral antibiotics. Postoperative infectious complications within 30 days after surgery were registered. RESULTS: From July 2020 to January 2021, 101 patients were included. The intraoperative diagnosis was complicated AA in 34 cases. Of these patients, six (17.6%) had bacteria cultured within 24 h after surgery, leading to a sensitivity of 60% and a specificity of 100%. The positive and negative predictive values were 1.00 and 0.96, respectively. Seven patients developed a postoperative infection (five superficial wound infections and two intra-abdominal abscess). In all cases with a positive cultivation result, the intraoperative diagnosis was complicated appendicitis and a postoperative course of antibiotics prescribed. CONCLUSION: Twenty-four-hour cultivation of the peritoneal fluid in acute appendicitis is a valid indicator for peritoneal bacterial contamination. Randomized studies are necessary to determine if this approach is suitable for targeting postoperative antibiotic treatment as a means to prevent overtreatment without increasing the risk of infectious complications.

Practice patterns and clinical outcomes in acute appendicitis differ in the elderly patient.

BACKGROUND: Appendicitis is the most frequent global abdominal surgical emergency. An ageing population, who often exhibit atypical symptoms and delayed presentations, challenge conventional diagnostic and treatment paradigms. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to delineate disparities in presentation, management, and outcomes between elderly patients and younger adults suffering from acute appendicitis. METHODS: This subgroup analysis forms part of ESTES SnapAppy, a time-bound multi-center prospective, observational cohort study. It includes patients aged 15 years and above who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy during a defined 90-day observational period across multiple centers. Statistical comparisons were performed using appropriate tests with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 521 elderly patients (≥65 years) and 4,092 younger adults (18-64 years). Elderly patients presented later (mean duration of symptoms: 7.88 vs. 3.56 days; p < 0.001) and frequently required computed tomography (CT) scans for diagnosis (86.1% vs. 54.0%; p < 0.001). The incidence of complicated appendicitis was higher in the elderly (46.7% vs. 20.7%; p < 0.001). Delays in surgical intervention were notable in the elderly (85.0% operated within 24 h vs. 88.7%; p = 0.018), with longer operative times (71.1 vs. 60.3 min; p < 0.001). Postoperative complications were significantly higher in the elderly (27.9% vs. 12.9%; p < 0.001), including severe complications (6.9% vs. 2.4%; p < 0.001) and prolonged hospital stays (7.9 vs. 3.6 days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight significant differences in the clinical course and outcomes of acute appendicitis in the elderly compared to younger patients, suggesting a need for age-adapted diagnostic pathways and treatment strategies to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Left-sided perforated appendicitis in a patient with situs inversus totalis, a case report.

Situs inversus, an uncommon disorder, causes the orientation of asymmetric organs to be opposite to that of normal anatomy. It can be either partial, affecting only the thoracic or abdominal cavities, or full, involving the transposition of both the thoracic and abdominal organs. A 31-year-old Ethiopian male patient presented with migratory abdominal pain in the left lower quadrant for 3 days. Associated with the pain, he experienced symptoms of nausea, vomiting of ingested matter, and loss of appetite. Investigations were consistent with left-sided appendicitis with situs inversus totalis. Therefore, the patient was operated on and discharged with no perioperative complications. Appendicitis is a rare cause of left lower quadrant pain. In order to reduce the delay in patient treatment and avoidable perioperative complications, emergency physicians, radiologists, and surgeons must become more knowledgeable about situs inversus and left side appendicitis.

Direct visualization endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic and therapeutic value of direct visualization (single-use eyeMax subscope) endoscopic management of acute uncomplicated appendicitis. METHODS: Thirty-six patients diagnosed with acute uncomplicated appendicitis, confirmed by computed tomography or ultrasonography, from Jan 2023 to Feb 2024 were enrolled in this study. We collected demographics, colonoscopy findings, subscope findings, clinical outcomes of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT), and adverse events associated with ERAT. RESULTS: Appendiceal intubation was successful for all 36 patients. Thirty-five patients (97.2%) were definitely confirmed as having acute uncomplicated appendicitis. One patient with negative appendicitis was diagnosed as having cecal diverticulitis with fecalith incarceration. The mean procedure time was 13.1 ± 13.6 min. One patient presented with worsening abdominal pain, and a computed tomography scan suggested a perforated appendix. The mean length of hospitalizations was 1.78 ± 2 days. The mean follow-up was 158 days; during this period, two patients (5.6%) experienced recurrent abdominal pain after 23 and 88 days and subsequently underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. CONCLUSION: Direct visualization ERAT may be effective for diagnosing and treating acute uncomplicated appendicitis and seems to have a low complication rate.

Development and validation of a new scoring system to discriminate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.

A scoring system to discriminate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis is beneficial to determine the optimal treatment for acute appendicitis. We developed a scoring system to discriminate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis and assessed the clinical usefulness of the scoring system using external validation. A total of 299 patients with acute appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred and ninety-nine patients were assigned to the model development group, while the other 100 patients were assigned to an external validation group. A scoring system for complicated appendicitis was created using a final multivariate logistic regression model with six independent predictors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the scoring system was 0.882 (95% confidence interval: 0.835-0.929). The cutoff point of the scoring system was 12, and the sensitivity and specificity were 82.9% and 86.2%, respectively. In the external validation group, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the scoring system was 0.868 (95% confidence interval 0.794-0.942), and there was no significant difference between the groups in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (P = 0.750). Our newly developed scoring system may contribute to prompt determination of the optimal treatment for acute appendicitis.