The Wiser Strategy of Using Beta-Agonists in Asthma: Mechanisms and Rationales.

Concerns regarding the safety of beta-2 agonists have led to revisions of the major asthma guidelines to better address these issues. Although these updates allow for a combination of previous and current strategies, they may confuse clinical practitioners. Beta-2 agonists are vital for alleviating asthma symptoms by relaxing smooth muscles; however, they also pose significant risks by inducing pro-inflammatory mediators both in vitro and in vivo. In addition to the risks of overuse and symptom masking, the use of beta-agonists alone at therapeutic doses can worsen airway inflammation and enhance virus-induced inflammation during asthma exacerbation. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) can effectively prevent these adverse effects. With new insights into the mechanisms of these adverse events, reserving short-acting beta-agonists for acute symptom relief during exacerbations and only for those who are already on ICS or oral steroids represents a careful approach to using beta-agonists with least adverse effects in patients with asthma. However, a major drawback of this approach is the potential non-compliance with ICS, leading to beta-agonist use without the necessary counteraction by ICS. An optimal strategy, both during and outside exacerbations, would integrate beta-agonists into an anti-inflammatory regimen that includes ICS, ideally combined with the same inhaler to ensure their concurrent use where finances allow. This would maintain the beneficial effects of beta-agonists, such as bronchodilation, while preventing the adverse effects from the induction of inflammatory mediators. This method is aligned with diverse clinical settings, maximizes the safe use of beta-agonists, and supports a comprehensive guideline-compliant management strategy.

Healthcare costs associated with short-acting ß2-agonists in asthma: observational UK SABINA study.

BACKGROUND: Poor asthma control is associated with high short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) use. AIM: To assess asthma-related healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) and medication costs associated with high versus low SABA prescriptions in the UK. DESIGN & SETTING: Analysis of SABINA I (SABA use IN Asthma I), a retrospective longitudinal study using UK electronic health records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD 2008-2019 and Hospital Episode Statistics database). METHOD: Eligible patients were ≥12 years old with SABA prescriptions in the past year. SABA prescriptions (number of canisters per year) were defined as high (≥3) or low (1-2). Association of SABA prescriptions with HCRU was assessed by negative binominal model adjusted for covariates. The UK unit costs from the NHS were applied to estimate total healthcare costs (2020). Medication costs were based on the annual average number of canisters per year per patient. RESULTS: Overall, 186 061 patients with SABA prescriptions were included, of whom 51% were prescribed high SABA. Total annual average costs (HCRU and medication) were 52% higher in the high SABA group versus the low SABA group (£2 256 091 per 1000 patients/year versus £1 480 640 per 1000 patients/year). Medication costs accounted for the majority of asthma-related costs. Across both groups, most HCRU costs were for non-exacerbation-related primary care or hospital outpatient visits. The annual average HCRU cost difference for high SABA versus low SABA was the greatest for hospitalisations (+230%; £15 521 per 1000 patients/year versus £4697 per 1000 patients/year) and exacerbation-related primary care visits (+162%; £18 770 per 1000 patients/year versus £7160 per 1000 patients/year). Asthma-related HCRU extrapolated to the broader UK asthma population was £108.5 million per year higher with high SABA versus low SABA. CONCLUSION: High SABA versus low SABA prescriptions are associated with higher asthma-related HCRU costs.

Functional Autoreactive Anti-ß2 Adrenergic Antibodies May Contribute to Insulin Resistance Profile in Patients with Chronic Chagas Disease.

Potential activation of ß2 adrenergic receptors (ß2AR) by specific autoreactive antibodies (Abs) that arise during the host reaction to Trypanosoma cruzi, could contribute to the elevated prevalence of metabolic disturbances described in patients with chronic Chagas disease (CCD). This study aimed to determine the prevalence of anti-ß2AR Abs in patients with CCD, as well as the correlation of these Abs with the presence of glucose and lipid metabolism disturbances, in order to explore their association with an insulin resistance profile. Additionally, we tested the functional effects of anti-ß2AR Abs employing an in vitro bioassay with neuroendocrine cells expressing ß2AR. A clinical and metabolic evaluation including an OGTT was performed in 80 CCD patients and 40 controls. Anti-ß2AR Abs were measured by an in-house-developed ELISA, and the ß2 adrenergic activity of affinity-purified IgG fractions from patient' sera were assayed in CRE-Luc and POMCLuc transfected AtT-20 cells. A higher proportion of dysglycemia (72.5% vs. 37.5%; p = 0.001) was observed in the CCD group, accompanied by increased HOMA2-IR (p = 0.019), especially in subjects with Abs (+). Anti-ß2AR Abs reactivity (7.01 (2.39-20.5); p = 0.0004) and age >50 years (3.83 (1.30-11.25); p = 0.014) resulted as relevant for IR prediction (AUC: 0.786). Concordantly, Abs (+) CCD patients showed elevated metabolic risk scores and an increased prevalence of atherogenic dyslipidemia (p = 0.040), as compared to Abs (-) patients and controls. On functional bioassays, Abs exerted specific and dose-dependent ß2-agonist effects. Our findings suggest that anti-ß2AR Abs may induce the activation of ß2AR in other tissues besides the heart; furthermore, we show that in patients with CCD these Abs are associated with an insulin resistance profile and atherogenic dyslipidemia, providing biological plausibility to the hypothesis that adrenergic activation by anti-ß2AR Abs could contribute to the pathogenesis of metabolic disturbances described in CCD patients, increasing their cardiovascular risk.

Efficacy of procaterol combined with inhaled budesonide for treatment of cough-variant asthma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Procaterol, a selective, short-acting beta-2 adrenoceptor agonist, is effective in treating 'classical' asthma, but its efficacy for cough-variant asthma (CVA) is unknown. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of procaterol combined with budesonide for CVA. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial in China was conducted. One hundred and fifty-nine patients diagnosed with CVA (aged 18-75 years) were randomly divided into two groups to receive twice daily for 8 weeks, inhaled budesonide 100 µg plus either oral procaterol 25 µg or placebo. Primary and secondary efficacy variables were cough symptom severity scores and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) life quality scores. Adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: The budesonide/placebo and budesonide/procaterol groups contained 80 and 78 participants (one excluded for later diagnosis of eosinophilic bronchitis), respectively, with similar baseline characteristics. Daily cough score declined during treatment in both groups and was lower in the budesonide/procaterol group at 8 (0.44 vs 0.73) and 10 (0.36 vs 0.69) weeks (P < 0.05). Compared with the budesonide/placebo group, the proportion of patients with a reduction of 3 points or greater (66% vs 42%) and that of patients scoring 0 points (63% vs 51%) was higher in the budesonide/procaterol group for daily cough scores (P < 0.05). At 8 weeks, LCQ score improvement was superior in the budesonide/procaterol group (38.94 ± 19.24 vs 32.71 ± 18.92; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Procaterol combined with budesonide was well tolerated and effective at improving cough symptoms and quality of life in patients with CVA.