Maximizing Ancillary Opportunities.

In the face of increasing overhead and declining reimbursement for hand surgery services, ancillary services provide additional opportunities for revenue capture outside the standard stream of office visits and surgical billing. These additional revenue streams may allow hand surgeons to practice with less stress, improve efficiency, and create more financial security overall. Hand surgery practices are quite diverse. There are solo practitioners, hand surgery group practice, hand surgery within a specialty group (most often orthopedic surgery), multispecialty clinics, and those who are incorporated within a health system. Each of these types of practices may provide different suites of ancillary services.

SAME day amBulatory c (SAMBA): a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: A recent meta-analysis concluded that outpatient appendectomy appears feasible and safe, but there is a lack of high-quality evidence and a randomized trial is needed. The aim of this trial is to demonstrate that outpatient appendectomy is non-inferior to conventional inpatient appendectomy in terms of overall morbi-mortality on the 30th postoperative day (D30). METHODS: SAMBA is a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter non-inferiority trial. We will include 1400 patients admitted to 15 French hospitals between January 2023 and June 2025. Inclusion criteria are patients aged between 15 and 74 years presenting acute uncomplicated appendicitis suitable to be operated by laparoscopy. Patients will be randomized to receive outpatient care (day-surgery) or conventional inpatient care with overnight hospitalization in the surgery department. The primary outcome is postoperative morbi-mortality at D30. Secondary outcomes include time from diagnosis to appendectomy, length of total hospital stay, re-hospitalization, interventional radiology, re-interventions until D30, conversion from outpatient to inpatient, and quality of life and patient satisfaction using validated questionnaires. DISCUSSION: The SAMBA trial tests the hypothesis that outpatient surgery (i.e., without an overnight hospital stay) of uncomplicated acute appendicitis is a feasible and reliable procedure in establishments with a technical platform able to support this management strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05691348. Registered on 20 January 2023.

From pain level to pain experience: redefining acute pain assessment to enhance understanding of chronic postsurgical pain.

BACKGROUND: Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) significantly impairs quality of life and poses a substantial healthcare burden, affecting up to a quarter of patients undergoing surgery. Although acute pain is recognised as a predictor for CPSP development, the role of patient experience remains underexplored. This study examines the predictive value of patient experience alongside traditional risk factors for CPSP after orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: An exploratory analysis was conducted on 294 patients from a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing continuous perineural analgesia and single-injection nerve block in ambulatory orthopaedic surgeries. Patient experience was assessed using the Evaluation du Vecu de l'Anesthésie Générale (EVAN-G) validated questionnaire. Factors associated with CPSP at 90 days after surgery were identified through univariate and multivariate analyses, incorporating patient-reported outcomes and classical variables. RESULTS: Out of 219 patients with complete data, 63 (29%) developed CPSP at day 90. Multivariate analysis revealed a poor pain experience, as assessed by the pain dimension of EVAN-G on postoperative day 2, as an independent predictor of CPSP (odds ratio 6.45, 95% confidence interval 1.65-25.26, P<0.01). Poor pain experience was associated with an augmented risk of CPSP. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the role of patient-reported outcomes, specifically the pain experience dimension captured by the EVAN-G scale, in prediction of CPSP 90 days after surgery. It suggests a shift from conventional assessments of pain intensity to a comprehensive understanding of pain experience, advocating for tailored pain management approaches that could reduce chronic pain, thereby improving patient quality of life and functional recovery.

Continuous monitoring after laparoscopic Roux-En-Y gastric bypass: a pathway to ambulatory care surgery - a pilot study.

Same-day discharge (SDD) after Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) faces resistance due to possible undetected postoperative complications. These present with changes in vital signs, which continuous remote monitoring devices can detect. This study compared continuous vital signs monitoring using the Isansys Patient Status Engine™ with standard nursing vital signs measurements to assess the device's reliability in postoperative surveillance of patients undergoing LRYGB. We conducted a pilot study including patients who underwent LRYGB. During their hospital stay, patients were continuously monitored using the Isansys Patient Status Engine™ with Lifetouch™, Lifetemp™, and Nonin Pulse Oximeter™ sensors. The heart rate (HR), body temperature, and oxygen saturation (SpO2) collected by the device were compared with standard nursing assessments. Thirteen patients with a mean body mass index of 41.5 ± 4.4 kg/m2 were included. No major complications occurred. The median HR assessed by standard and continuous monitoring did not significantly differ (75.5 [69-88] vs. 77 [66-91] bpm, p = 0.995), nor did the mean values of SpO2 (94.7 ± 2.0 vs. 93.7 ± 1.8%, p = 0,057). A significant difference was observed in median body temperature between the nursing staff and the monitoring device (36.3 [36.1-36.7] vs. 36.1 [34.5-36.6] degrees Celsius, p = 0.012), with a tendency for lower temperature measurements by the device. In conclusion, this is the first study on continuous postoperative surveillance using the Isansys Patient Status Engine™ monitoring device for LRYGB patients. Our results introduce a novel tool for more efficient surgery. Prospective randomized experimental studies are warranted to evaluate this method's efficacy and safety.

Enhanced recovery after surgery: Progress in adapted pathways for implementation in standard and emerging surgical settings.

The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been practiced for decades and has been implemented in numerous surgical specialties. ERAS is a global surgical quality improvement initiative, and it is an element in the field of perioperative care. ERAS had shown significant clinical outcomes, patient-reported satisfaction, and improvements in medical service cost. ERAS has been developed for specific surgical procedures, but with the fast progress of newly introduced surgical procedures, the original ERAS have been developed and modified. Recently appearing Topics and future research trends encompass ERAS protocols for other types of surgery and the enhancement of perioperative status, including but not limited to pediatric surgery, laparoscopic and robotic assisted surgery, bariatric surgery, thoracic surgery, and renal transplantation. The elements and pathways of ERAS have been developed with the introduction of up-to-date methodologies in the pre-operative, operative, and post-operative pathways. ERAS costs are higher than traditional care, but the patient's clinical outcome and satisfaction are higher. ERAS is in progress in the fields of anesthetic tasks, pediatric surgery, and organ transplantation. Although ERAS has shown significant clinical outcomes, there are needs to modify the protocol for specific cases, hospital facilities, resources, and nurses training on elements of ERAS. Several challenges and limitations exist in the implementation of ERAS that deserve consideration, it includes: Frailty, maximizing nutrition, prehabilitation, treating preoperative anemia, and enhancing ERAS adoption globally are all included.

The Impact of Pediatric Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in a Community Based Children's Ambulatory Surgery Center - It's Safe and Effective.

PURPOSE: Pediatric surgery in a free-standing children's ambulatory surgery center (C-ASC) is a common practice. The implementation of minimally invasive surgery in this setting may be associated with unique challenges. The purpose of this study was to compare a cohort of children who underwent laparoscopic (LHR) and open inguinal hernia repairs (OHR) at the C-ASC as part of a quality assurance initiative to assess safety and efficacy. METHODS: From January 2021 to December 2021, the records of all children who underwent LHR or OHR at our C-ASC were analyzed. The following data was retrieved and compared with the Student's t-test: age, weight, gender, procedure type, total room time (RT), total operative time (OT), and outcomes. RESULTS: Eighty-eight (n = 88) children underwent LHR or OHR during this period. There was no difference between the two groups regarding their age or weight. Both groups had equal outcomes, specifically, no wound infections or recurrent hernias. (2.5 year follow-up). There was a significant reduction in RT and OT in those children who underwent unilateral LHR compared to unilateral OHR (15% and 17% respectively, p < 0.05). In those children who underwent bilateral LHR and bilateral OHR, there was a reduction in RT and OT in the LHR group compared to OHR, but it was not significant (10% and 12% respectively, p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric LHR is safe and effective in the C-ASC. The unilateral LHR technique is associated with a significant reduction in total room time and operative time compared to the unilateral OHR technique. Additional analyses would be important to examine the relationship of time and outcomes in this setting. TYPE OF STUDY: Original Research Retrospective Case-control study.

Trends in Payments for Facility and Surgeon Professional Fees for Shoulder Surgeries Performed at Ambulatory Surgery Centers.

BACKGROUND: It has previously been demonstrated that utilization of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) results in cost savings and improved outcomes. Despite these benefits, Medicare reimbursement for professional fees at ASCs are decreasing over time. In this study, we sought to analyze the discrepancy between facility fee and professional fee reimbursements for ASCs by Medicare for common shoulder procedures over time. We hypothesized that professional fees for shoulder procedures would decrease over the study period while facility fees kept pace with inflation. METHODS: Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify shoulder specific procedures approved for ASCs by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Procedures were grouped into arthroscopic and open categories. Publicly available data from CMS was accessed via the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Lookup Tool and used to determine professional fee payments from 2018-2024. Additionally, Medicare ASC Payment Rates files were accessed to determine facility fee reimbursements to ASCs from 2018-2024. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate means and percent change over time. Compound annual growth rates (CAGR) were calculated and discrepancies in inflation were corrected for using the Consumer Price Index. The Benjamini and Hochberg method was used to correct P values in the setting of multiple comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 33 common shoulder procedures were included for analysis (10 arthroscopic codes and 23 open codes). Reimbursements for facility fees have remained significantly higher than corresponding professional fees for both open and arthroscopic procedures (p<0.01). On average, facility fee reimbursements for common shoulder surgeries have risen on an annual basis in a manner consistent with inflation (p=0.838). However, professional fees for these procedures have experienced a nearly uniform decline over the study period both nominally and in inflation-adjusted dollars (p=0.064 and p=0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Facility fee payments for outpatient approved shoulder surgeries have matched or outpaced inflation. Over the same time period, professional fee reimbursements for surgeons are consistently decreasing, both in absolute and inflation-adjusted dollars. Reform to the physician fee schedule is necessary to ensure that Medicare patients retain access to high-quality physician care.

Anastomotic metabolic and bariatric surgeries with same-day discharge: 30-day outcomes of a cohort from a high-volume center in Canada.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of our extensive experience in same-day discharge (SDD) sleeve gastrectomy, we extended this management strategy to anastomotic metabolic and bariatric surgeries (MBS). OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively analyze early outcomes (≤30 d) after anastomotic MBS with planned SDD (≤12 hr). SETTING: University Hospital, Canada; Public Practice. METHODS: SDD anastomotic MBS were proposed with strict preoperative criteria and included single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), and single-anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI). Enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols and post-anesthesia care unit criteria were followed. Unplanned overnight stay, emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, morbidity-mortality, and reintervention rates were analyzed. RESULTS: Since 2021, 208 patients (191 female and 17 male) have undergone SDD anastomotic MBS, with 76% conversion procedures: 92 SADI-S, 72 RYGB, 35 OAGB, and 9 SASI (mean age = 41.4 yr and mean preoperative body mass index = 41.9 kg/m2). Unplanned overnight stays and ED visits were 4.8% and 4.3%, respectively. Readmission rate was 5.8% (5 SADI-S, 5 RYGB, 1 OAGB, and 1 SASI). Overall morbidity rate was 14.9%, including 3.9% major complications. Within 30 days postoperatively, there were 2 duodenal leaks, 1 intrabdominal collection, 1 common bile duct stenosis, and 1 acute appendicitis in the SADI-S group. There were 2 occlusions on the jejunojejunal anastomosis and 1 bleeding on the gastrojejunal anastomosis in the RYGB group. Five (2.4%) required reintervention with no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We report low and acceptable rates of unplanned overnight stay, readmission, and reintervention. Early outcomes suggest that SDD anastomotic MBS seems safe and feasible with an experienced team, selective criteria, and appropriate postoperative follow-up.

Same Day Discharge Total Knee Arthroplasty: Hospital Demonstrates Similar Outcomes to Ambulatory Surgery Center in a More Complex Patient Population.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between patients undergoing same-day discharge (SDD) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) versus a tertiary care university hospital setting. METHODS: A single tertiary academic center's institutional database was reviewed for patients who underwent primary TKA and were discharged the same day from August 2021 to January 2024. Patients who did not have at least 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, patient-reported outcome measures, emergency department visits, admissions, reoperations, and revisions were collected. Patients were stratified by the location of their surgery: ASC versus hospital. Specific criteria had to be met prior to surgery at the ASC, and the final decision regarding the location of surgery was made via shared decision-making between the patient and their surgeon. Patients who did not meet ASC criteria underwent TKA at the main hospital. Univariable analyses were used to compare groups, and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine if surgical location was a significant factor. Of the 449 TKAs meeting inclusion criteria, 63.3% (284) were performed at the ASC and 36.7% (165) at the university hospital at a mean follow-up of 1.51 years (range, 1.00 to 2.40). Of those 165 whose surgery was done at the hospital, 93.9% met at least one ASC exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Patients whose TKA was done at the hospital had significantly higher weight (P = 0.003), body mass index (P < 0.001), Elixhauser comorbidity index (P < 0.001), proportion of patients who had an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 3 (P = 0.023), and proportion of patients who required general anesthesia (P < 0.001). Additionally, patients whose TKA was done at the hospital had higher preoperative patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) (62.0 [59.0, 66.0] versus 63.0 [61.8, 67.0]; P = 0.006), and lower physical function (PF) (39.0 [36.0, 43.0] versus 38.0 [34.0, 41.0]; P = 0.001). At 1 year, however, patients in both groups had similar PROMIS PI (53.0 [49.0, 59.0] versus 54.0 [44.0, 59.0]; P = 0.785) and PROMIS PF (47.0 [42.0, 51.0] versus 47.0 [41.0, 50.0]; P = 0.422) scores as well as similar rates of achieving minimum clinically important difference for PROMIS PI (64.4 versus 71.4%; P = 0.336) and PROMIS PF (60.5 versus 71.4%; P = 0.124). They also had a similar number of emergency department visits and admissions at 30 and 90 days, as well as similar reoperation-free (92.0 versus 93.3%; P = 0.79) and revision-free (95.5 versus 99.4%; P = 0.59) survival at 2 years CONCLUSIONS: Although ASCs have strict patient criteria for SDD TKA, complex patients at a tertiary university hospital can be sent home the same day with equivalent outcomes. Therefore, unhealthier patients can safely achieve SDD without compromising outcomes if done in the appropriate setting.

Safety and feasibility of cardiac electrophysiology procedures in ambulatory surgery centers.

BACKGROUND: Despite their improved safety, by and large, cardiac electrophysiology procedures including catheter ablation (CA), are presently performed in hospital outpatient departments. OBJECTIVE: This large multicenter study investigated the safety and outcomes associated with various cardiac electrophysiology procedures performed at 6 ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), primarily during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic under the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospitals Without Walls program. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes from consecutive electrophysiology procedures performed in ASCs with same-day discharge, including transesophageal echocardiography, cardioversion, cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation, electrophysiology studies, and CA for atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter (AFL)/supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular premature complexes (VPCs), and atrioventricular node. RESULTS: Altogether, 4037 procedures were performed, including 779 transesophageal echocardiography/cardioversion procedures (19.3%), 1453 CIED implantation procedures (36.0%), 26 electrophysiology studies (0.6%), and 1779 CA procedures (44.1%) for AF (75.4%), AFL/supraventricular tachycardia (18.8%), VPC (4.7%), and atrioventricular node (1.1%). Overall, 80.2% of CA procedures were for left-sided atrial arrhythmias (AF/atypical AFL) requiring transseptal catheterization. Left-sided VPC ablation procedures (42.2%) were performed using a transseptal/retrograde approach. Adverse event rates were low, but comparable between CIED implantation and CA (0.76% vs 0.73%; P = .93), as were the incidences of urgent/unplanned postprocedure hospitalization (0.48% vs 0.45%; P = .89), respectively. Moreover, the adverse event rates in ASCs vs hospital outpatient departments did not differ for CIED (0.76% vs 0.65%; P = .71) or CA (0.73% vs 0.80%; P = .79). CONCLUSION: The results from this large multicenter study suggest that ASCs represent a safe and effective setting to perform a variety of cardiac electrophysiology procedures including CA. These findings bear important implications for healthcare delivery and policy.

A 5-Year Clinical Experience of Pediatric Ophthalmic Ambulatory Surgery Under General Anesthesia From a Chinese Tertiary Children's Hospital.

PURPOSE: Ambulatory surgery (same-day or day surgery) is an efficient medical practice. However, there were few reports regarding the safety of ophthalmic ambulatory surgery for children under general anesthesia. This study aims to explore its clinical complications. DESIGN: A retrospective observational study. METHODS: The clinical data of pediatric patients who received ambulatory ophthalmic surgery under general anesthesia at the Children's Hospital of Fudan University from January 2015 to December 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Postoperative complications, unplanned reoperation, delayed discharge, and other adverse events were analyzed. FINDINGS: Consecutive patients (N = 4,616) had an average age of 4.6 ± 2.6 years. The primary surgical procedures included chalazion incision and curettage (62.89%), strabismus surgery (18.98%), trichiasis surgery (14.36%), eyelid or orbital mass resection (2.49%), blepharoptosis surgery (0.91%), and other procedures (0.37%). The average operative time was 25.28 ± 20.45 minutes (n = 2,698), while the average length of hospital stay was 8.45 ± 2.61 hours. No serious adverse events or death happened. One case had delayed postoperative hemorrhage, one had a postoperative infection, and two had delayed discharge. The rate of unplanned reoperation was 0.39% 90 days after surgery, with recurrence of chalazion and postoperative complications of ptosis as the primary reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric ophthalmic ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia is a feasible and efficient operation mode with few complications for simple procedures with good general conditions. Further randomized controlled studies are needed to provide strong evidence of the safety and socioeconomic efficacy of this mode.

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in the Ambulatory Surgery Center: A Narrative Review.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complication of ambulatory surgery, leading to numerous deleterious effects such as decreased patient satisfaction, prolonged recovery unit stays, and rarely, more serious complications such as aspiration pneumonia or wound dehiscence. In this paper, we present a narrative review of the literature regarding common risk factors for PONV including patient factors, surgical factors, and anesthetic factors. We then will review anesthetic techniques and antiemetic drugs demonstrated to mitigate the risk of PONV. Finally, we discuss the potential economic benefits of PONV prophylaxis in the perioperative ambulatory setting.

Safety and feasibility of enhanced recovery after surgery-based management model for ambulatory pediatric surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: There is still some room for optimizing ambulatory pediatric surgical procedures, and the preoperative and postoperative management quality for pediatric patients needs to be improved. AIM: To discuss the safety and feasibility of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)-based management model for ambulatory pediatric surgical procedures. METHODS: We selected 320 pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory surgery from June 2023 to January 2024 at The First People's Hospital of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture. Of these, 220 received ERAS-based management (research group) and 100 received routine management (control group). General information, postoperative ambulation activities, surgical outcomes (operation time, postoperative gastrointestinal ventilation time, and hospital stay), postoperative pain visual analogue scale, postoperative complications (incision infection, abdominal distension, fever, nausea, and vomiting), and family satisfaction were compared. RESULTS: The general information of the research group (sex, age, disease type, single parent, family history, etc.) was comparable to that of the control group (P > 0.05), but the rate of postoperative (2 h, 4 h, and 6 h after surgery) ambulation activities was statistically higher (P < 0.01), and operation time, postoperative gastrointestinal ventilation time, and hospital stay were markedly shorter (P < 0.05). The research group had lower visual analogue scale scores (P < 0.01) at 12 h and 24 h after surgery and a lower incidence of total postoperative complications than the control group (P = 0.001). The research group had higher family satisfaction than the control group (P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: The ERAS-based management model was safe and feasible in ambulatory pediatric surgical procedures and worthy of clinical promotion.

Efficiency of Foot and Ankle Surgeries Completed on the Preoperative Stretcher vs Operating Room Table: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Extremity surgeons frequently operate on the preoperative stretcher rather than the operating room (OR) table. This study sought to identify differences between stretcher-based (SB) and OR table-based (TB) procedures with regard to time efficiency and OR team member preferences. Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficiency of SB vs OR TB foot and ankle procedures. Fifty-two patients undergoing a hardware removal, isolated gastrocnemius recession, soft tissue procedure, or foreign body removal at our day surgery unit were included. Start time and exit time were recorded. "Start time" was the number of minutes between the patient entering the OR and first incision. "Exit time" was the number of minutes between the procedure ending and the patient exiting the OR. Surveys were disseminated to OR staff who participated in the included cases. Results: The total measured time in the OR was an average 6 minutes shorter in the Stretcher group compared to the OR Table group (10 minutes vs 16 minutes, P < .001). SB procedures were associated with a significantly shorter start time (median difference = 4 minutes, P = .001), but not exit time (median difference = 1 minute, P = .058). No difference was found in actual surgical time. Thirty (96.8%) OR team members perceived SB procedures as enhancing OR efficiency, and 30 (96.8%) respondents considered SB procedures to be equal or superior to OR TB procedures in terms of patient safety. All would recommend or strongly recommend SB procedures. Conclusion: We found SB foot and ankle procedures to require less room time than OR TB procedures. Particularly for high-volume specialties, an average 6 minutes saved per case may meaningfully improve overall OR efficiency. Most OR team members believed that SB surgery improves OR efficiency and is the safer option for OR team members. Level of Evidence: Level II, randomized controlled trial, survey.

Business and Corporate Models for Interventional Radiology in the Office Based Lab and Ambulatory Surgical Center Setting.

The landscape of healthcare is shifting towards outpatient settings such as Office-Based Labs (OBLs) and Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs). This transition, driven by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), presents various business and corporate models for interventional radiologists seeking to practice outside traditional hospital environments. The role of private equity and management services in facilitating these transitions is highlighted, offering opportunities for growth, efficiency, and enhanced control over practice operations. The document also discusses the financial aspects of establishing an OBL or ASC, the benefits of outpatient procedures, and the adaptability of private equity deals to the specific needs of medical practices. It concludes by emphasizing the potential for long-term wealth creation and the adaptability of these models to individual physician needs.

Opioid free analgesia after return home in ambulatory colonic surgery patients: a single-center observational study.

BACKGROUND: Because of the adverse effects of morphine and its derivatives, non-opioid analgesia procedures are proposed after outpatient surgery. Without opioids, the ability to provide quality analgesia after the patient returns home may be questioned. We examined whether an opioid-free strategy could ensure satisfactory analgesia after ambulatory laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational single-center study (of prospective collected database) including all patients eligible for scheduled outpatient colectomy. Postoperative analgesia was provided by paracetamol and nefopam. Postoperative follow-up included pain at mobilization (assessed by a numerical rating scale, NRS), hemodynamic variables, temperature, resumption of transit and biological markers of postoperative inflammation. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with moderate to severe pain (NRS > 4) the day after surgery. RESULTS: Data from 144 patients were analyzed. The majority were men aged 59 ± 12 years with a mean BMI of 27 [25-30] kg/m2. ASA scores were 1 for 14%, 2 for 59% and 3 for 27% of patients. Forty-seven patients (33%) underwent surgery for cancer, 94 for sigmoiditis (65%) and 3 (2%) for another colonic pathology. Postoperative pain was affected by time since surgery (Q3 = 52.4,p < 0.001) and decreased significantly from day to day. The incidence of moderate to severe pain at mobilization (NRS > 4) on the first day after surgery was (0.19; 95% CI, 0.13-0.27). CONCLUSION: Non-opioid analgesia after ambulatory laparoscopic colectomy seems efficient to ensure adequate analgesia. This therapeutic strategy makes it possible to avoid the adverse effects of opioids. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered and approved by the relevant institutional review board (CERAR) reference IRB 00010254-2018 - 188). All patients gave written informed consent for analysis of their data. The anonymous database was declared to the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) (reference 221 2976 v0 of April 12, 2019).

Fully ambulatory robotic single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI): 40 consecutive patients in a single tertiary bariatric center.

BACKGROUND: Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal bypass (SADI) is becoming a key option as a revision procedure after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). However, its safety as an ambulatory procedure (length of stay < 12 h) has not been widely described. METHODS: A prospective bariatric study of 40 patients undergoing SADI robotic surgery after LSG with same day discharge (SDD), was undertaken in April 2021. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied and the enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocol was followed. Anesthesia and robotic procedures were standardized. Early follow-up (30 days) analyzed postoperative (PO) outcomes. RESULTS: Forty patients (37 F/3 M, mean age: 40.3yo), with a mean pre-operative BMI = 40.5 kg/m2 were operated. Median time after LSG was 54 months (21-146). Preoperative comorbidities included: hypertension (n = 3), obstructive sleep apnea (n = 2) and type 2 diabetes (n = 1). Mean total operative time was 128 min (100-180) (mean robotic time: 66 min (42-85)), including patient setup. All patients were discharged home at least 6 h after surgery. There were four minor complications (10%) and two major complications (5%) in the first 30 days postoperative (one intrabdominal abscess PO day-20 (radiological drainage and antibiotic therapy) and one peritonitis due to duodenal leak PO day-1 (treated surgically)). There were six emergency department visits (15%), readmission rate was 5% (n = 2) and reintervention rate was 2.5% (n = 1) There was no mortality and no unplanned overnight hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic SADI can be safe for SDD, with appropriate patient selection, in a high-volume center.

Effect of surgery setting for outpatient shoulder procedures on early postoperative complications in a military population.

BACKGROUND: There has been a recent push to transition procedures previously performed at hospital-based outpatient surgical departments (HOPDs) to ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). However, limited data regarding differences in early postoperative complications and care utilization (eg, emergency department visits and unplanned admissions) may drive increased overall costs or worse outcomes. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to examine differences in early 90-day adverse outcomes and postoperative emergency department visits associated with shoulder surgeries excluding arthroplasties that were performed in HOPDs and ASCs in a closed military health care system. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcomes between treatment settings. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the records for 1748 elective shoulder surgeries from 2015 to 2020. Patients were considered as 1 of 2 cohorts depending on whether they underwent surgery in an ASC or HOPD setting. We evaluated groups for differences incomplexity, surgical time, and medical risk. Outcome measures were emergency department visits, unplanned hospital admissions, and complications within the first 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: There was no difference in 90-day postoperative emergency department visits between procedures performed at HOPDs (n = 606) and ASCs (n = 1142). There was a slight increase in rate of unplanned hospital admission within 90 days after surgery in the HOPD cohort, most commonly for pain or overnight observation. The surgical time was significantly shorter (105 vs. 119 minutes, P < .01) at the ASC, but there was no difference in case complexity between the cohorts (P = .28). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in appropriate patients, surgery in ASCs can be safely leveraged for its costs savings, efficiency, patient satisfaction, decreases in operative time, and potentially decreased resource utilization both during surgery and in the early postoperative period.